Adolf Hitler – RationalWiki

Anyone who sees and paints a sky green and fields blue ought to be sterilized. Adolf Hitler[1]

Adolf Elizabeth[2]Schicklgruber[3]Hitler (18891945) was leader of the German Nazi Party from 1921 and chancellor, and eventually dictator, or Fhrer (“leader”), of Nazi Germany from 1933 until his suicide in 1945. Hitler was Austrian by birth, and came to power by way of a series of legal and extralegal maneuverings. His decidedly toxic message of racism and antisemitism is summed up in his manifesto, Mein Kampf,[4] written while imprisoned in the 1920s after trying to lead a coup d’tat[note 1] against the Weimar Republic.

He was a bad human being. Solely as a politician, though, he was probably the greatest that ever lived. He invented modern politics. Discredit the opposition, create fear to control the population, make a permanent enemy that isn’t tangible, push agendas in state-controlled media, glorify the military as heroes to the nation like some sort of Mycaenan Greek city-state. There’s politicians today in most countries that use his ideas and are actually proud of it. Call him what you want, but he wasn’t a bad politician. (Now if you want to see a comedically-bad military strategist Adolf’s your guy.)

He was also a vegetarian (which pretty much confirms everything you always suspected about vegetarians), but not a strict one, and this was not so much a matter of principle as a result of his doctor’s attempt to cure him of gastric problems.[5][6]

As the leading perpetrator of the most destructive war in modern history, and for his role in the murder of six million European Jews, several million ethnic Slavs (among others), gypsies, homosexuals, and communists, he is viewed by some as being the most evil person ever to have lived. It is estimated that over 12 million people were killed as a result of the Holocaust (about 1.5 times the current population of New York City[7]) not counting the even larger number of victims who never even saw a concentration camp (some 13+ million civilians were murdered in cold blood, worked or starved to death in the USSR alone[8]). Remarkably, this lunatic still has some admirers, although thankfully not quite as many as his lunatic contemporary Joseph Stalin, who killed a mere six to nine million (according to the “nicest” estimates at least; estimates from most mainstream historians put Stalin’s death toll at about 20 million, though one could argue that since Stalin wasn’t the main provoker of World War II and that Hitler planned to kill far more people if he had the chance Hitler was still worse).[9][10] This is partially evidenced by the fact that one can praise Stalin in public without fear of retribution.[note 2] The hive of unrelenting racists known as Metapedia likes to refer to Hitler “uniting Europe against the evil Communist menace,” when in reality it was communist and non-communist Europe uniting against him and the countries he had bullied into throwing in with Germany, with communism dying off over 45 years afterward.

Despite what role Adolf Hitler may have had in the success of his genocidal quest, as an individual he had a finite existence and finite power, and was reliant on a great many subordinates to push his agenda through. It could be argued that his own actions did not make him solely accountable for those who chose to follow him and enable his influence. However, he governed according to the Fhrerprinzip, according to which the top leader takes on responsibility for all decisions, with his underlings being only “advisers”, so it could also be argued that Hitler himself took on some responsibility for the actions of his followers (although not all the responsibility).

Although the Holocaust was hardly the first genocide in human history, and it may not even be the one with the most victims,[note 3] it is special for one reason: the creation of a whole industry (Industrialisierter Massenmord, or “industrialized mass-murder”) with the sole purpose of exterminating an entire “race” is a unique event in the history of mankind.

Hitler got off to a good start in World War II by taking over most of mainland Europe, but bit off more than he could chew by simultaneously fighting Great Britain (along with her colonies and dominions, such as Canada, Australia, India, etc.), declaring war on the United States and invading Russia. Were he to have left Britain alone and to have stuck to his peace treaty with Stalin, it is likely he would have held his European mainland conquests for some time.[note 4] It is quite likely that Hitler never played the board game Risk as a child.[note 5]

His early campaigns against Poland and France were overwhelming victories for the Wehrmacht, but the reason was not Hitler’s strategic “insight”, but rather a combination of Poland having indefensible borders and hinterland, bad planning on the French side, some reckless (but eventually successful) actions of a few German officers, and a huge amount of luck.[note 6] As the years passed, his megalomania got the better of him and his later mistakes would cost him all his “gains”. Obsessed with his desire to acquire more vespene gas additional “living space” (Lebensraum) for the German people, he invaded the Soviet Union in 1941. Acquiring access to strategic resources, most importantly the rich oilfields of Baku, might have been a secondary motivation for this attack. Still not satisfied with the number of his opponents, he declared war on the United States after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The later stages of the war would see his growing detachment from reality, accompanied by an ever-stronger desire to micromanage the entire German military effort. Despite facing a completely hopeless situation from late 1943 onwards, he went on to order his increasingly imaginary armies (notably that of Felix Steiner) into ill-fated counterattacks on the advancing Allied troops, but when the counterattacks failed, Hitler always blamed his generals. With the Soviets on his doorstep, he finally saw fit to rant about Hermann Fegelein, and off himself on April 30th, 1945, ending the war in Europe.

Adolf Hitler’s religious beliefs or purported lack of religious belief are a matter of much dispute, both among serious historians and biographers, and among political partisans wanting to score a cheap shot by associating Hitler with either Christianity or atheism. This has become particularly common in recent years, with pundits from the American religious right such as Ann Coulter[11] declaring Hitler an atheist, with the implication that atheists are devoid of morals and that atheism leads to extremist politics like those of Hitler. On the other side of religious divide, many New Atheists are fond of pointing out Hitler’s record as a practicing Christian. For example, Richard Dawkins, responding to a speech by Pope Benedict XVI during his Papal visit to the UK in 2010 which had associated the atheism and secularism with “a Nazi tyranny that wished to eradicate God from society”,[12] made a speech quoting several comments by Hitler which had made reference to God and Jesus as sources of inspiration.[13]

The problem here is that both sides are selectively cherry-picking evidence for how they view Hitler, and their association fallacies aren’t very effective since Hitler’s beliefs and actions really didn’t fit the conventional profile for either a Christian or an atheist. We cannot easily determine how far Hitler believed or did not believe favorable statements he made about Christianity. We know Hitler was a skilled manipulator and used the Nazi brand of Positive Christianity to encourage the way of thinking he wanted. Hitler was clearly not an orthodox Christian.[14]

Hitlers views, which today might be called “spiritual” ones, are further spelled out in the statement that begins surprisingly with the remark, “Einstein did me a favor. In an unprecedented triumph of insight and mathematics he was able to prove what I for one have always known, namely, that the universe consists of multiple dimensions. These other dimensions, you see, are the source of my inspiration. My body, my very being is a finely tuned instrument in which the waves emanating from the other dimensions resonate and strike chords. Common, everyday people cant discern them of course, so they are always the first to scoff, anything they cannot see or comprehend immediately cannot, to their minds, exist. They are so narrow minded and pedestrian that there’s no use even talking to them about such things. For only the true artist, the one who can feel the pulse of the eternal multi-dimensional universe can hope to catch even a glimpse of the scenes unfolding in those dimensions that are destined to intrude into ours.” We can all probably find at least a part of ourselves somewhere in that quote.

Worthy of note is that his propaganda officer, Joseph Goebbels, sought to make Germanic paganism popular as a religious movement. Hitler’s idea probably would have been to slowly let people move away from the Christian doctrine to let them convert to Germanic paganism. So if there was anything that would describe the religious belief of Hitler, it would be this, despite the belief being very outdated and doomed from the start. Even back in his day, you would be hard-pressed to find someone who believes in the German heroic myths and considered Odin to be a supreme being.

Hitler was confirmed as a Roman Catholic and identified as a Catholic for most or all of his life, never openly renouncing his Catholicism, though the theology he later developed for Nazi Germany (Positive Christianity) diverged considerably from Catholic beliefs and practices. Relations between the Nazi Party and the Catholic Church were uneasy. Although Pope Pius XI had an anti-Nazi encyclical read in all German Catholic churches in 1937, and his successor Pius XII (who wrote the anti-Nazi encyclical in question) has been nominated for “Righteous Among the Nations” status for his work in saving Jews during the Holocaust, the Catholic Church did not take all that much open action against the Nazis. On the other hand, one can argue that open defiance of Hitler would have risked the lives of Catholic citizens (and the Jews they might be protecting). The Church had better relations with some of Germany’s fascist allies, Italy and Spain in particular.

As an adult, Hitler often spoke and wrote positively about religion, and about Jesus Christ whom he viewed as an Aryan denouncing the corruption and decadence of Jews. References to God and divine inspiration were common in Hitler’s speeches at Nazi rallies. The following are a few examples:

Today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.

My feelings as a Christian point me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter.

It matters not whether these weapons of ours are humane: if they gain us our freedom, they are justified before our conscience and before our God.

A speech he gave in 1937 also contained numerous references to God, in which he also quite explicitly refers to “God’s work” in talking about human beings and their characteristics.[19]

As Chancellor, Hitler also launched an “anti-godless” campaign against atheist and freethought organizations, specifically against the atheism associated with Stalin’s Communism, “Gottlosenbewegung” in German (literally “movement of the godless” associated with “wicked communism”). In a 1933 speech he declared “We have stamped [Gottlosenbewegung] out”.

Accounts of conversations suggest that Hitler was privately much more critical of Christianity than he was in his speeches, and possibly even an atheist or a deist. Most of these accounts come from Hitler’s Table Talk,[wp] a collection of monologues and conversations between Hitler and his inner circle of advisers and high-ranking Nazi leaders in the early 1940s, which were transcribed in shorthand at the time and later collated and published long after Hitler’s death.

Regardless of what Hitler believed about God or Christ, comments in Hitler’s Table Talk indicate that he was highly critical of the church and of conventional organized Christianity with its “love thy neighbor” attitude (something he saw as weak), and that he resented having to pander to Christian values for popular support. He was also very negative about Paul of Tarsus, whom he viewed as the originator of these values and as a “proto-Bolshevik”. Among the most outspoken comments are the following:

Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.

Science cannot lie, for it’s always striving, according to the momentary state of knowledge, to deduce what is true. When it makes a mistake, it does so in good faith. It’s Christianity that’s the liar. It’s in perpetual conflict with itself. One may ask whether the disappearance of Christianity would entail the disappearance of belief in God. That’s not to be desired.

This negative attitude towards Christianity (at least in its conventional form) also reflects similar comments he had made in Mein Kampf, such as “Each one of us to-day may regret the fact that the advent of Christianity was the first occasion on which spiritual terror was introduced into the much freer ancient world”.

Mein Krampf Kampf (My Struggle)[note 7] was written by Hitler whilst imprisoned for two years after the Munich Putsch in 1923. Apparently it was edited with the help of a Roman Catholic priest, who was subsequently assassinated on the “Night of the Long Knives.” It is a rambling, seemingly unedited, account of Hitler’s “personal difficulties”. These he attributed to the Jews who were running the capitalist system; to the same Jews who were also somehow simultaneously running the Bolsheviks trying to overthrow the capitalist system; and to the Jews who had been responsible for the surrender of Germany in 1918. Despite this autobiography being a jingoistic, ber-Germanic screed, Hitler also decided to give a shoutout to fellow anti-Semite Henry Ford for his sterling propaganda efforts against the Jooz.

A particularly poignant struggle was young Adolf’s rejection from the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, where they advised him to try to become an architect, but he did not have a high school diploma, so he opted to try his hand at World Domination instead. The school probably still regrets this.

In the controversial The Jew of Linz, Kimberley Cornish suggested that Hitler’s animosity against the Jews developed when he met one in his class at school, who was smarter than everyone else and generally irritating. His name was Ludwig Wittgenstein, who later became a philosopher. Wittgenstein, with uncharacteristic practical wisdom, fled to Oxford in the 1930s, where he did prove smarter than everyone else and threatened Karl Popper with a poker.

Mein Kampf didn’t exactly sell badly until 1933, but with about 220,000 copies sold, it wasn’t a real bestseller, either, and in fact was held in contempt by most establishment conservatives and right-wing extremists (including, amusingly enough, Benito Mussolini). It wasn’t until 1933 that millions of copies were printed and handed out for just about any major or minor event in the life of a German (marriage, childbirth, entry into the Nazi Party) as a gift.

Like any “bible”, Mein Kampf isn’t actually meant to be read by its believers. It is boring, repetitive and, unsurprisingly, poorly written. The most recent English edition is peppered with footnotes indicating each of Hitler’s lies and exaggerations, starting on the first page. The book, however, is often strangely hilarious. Hitler’s tendency to make outrageous claims in a completely unironic, deadpan manner are a frequent source of unintentional comedy.

In fact Istanbul-born German comedian Serdar Somuncu for a time made a living touring Germany and reading Mein Kampf in a way that made it appear as the hilarious string of badly written sentences that it is (though not as badly written as this one).[20]

At the time of his rule, there were rumors that Hitler was a quarter Jewish because the paternity of his father was questionable and his grandmother had worked in the house of a Jewish man named Frankenburger in Graz[wp]. However, no evidence has been uncovered which would substantiate this rumor.[note 8] Hitler himself ordered genealogists to investigate the rumor. He concluded that he was not of Jewish ancestry and Johann Georg Hiendler was his paternal grandfather. Modern historians have also come to the conclusion that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was not a Jew. This is because there is no record of Mr. Frankenburger ever having existed and because Jews were not permitted to live anywhere in Styria[wp], including Graz, until the 1860s, several decades after Hitler’s father Alois Hitler was born.

Adolf Hitler was raised a Roman Catholic and apparently professed Catholicism throughout his life, but historians generally believe there is no evidence that he received the sacraments of Catholicism after childhood, and some argue that he mainly invoked Catholicism as a form of propaganda. Still, the fact remains that he tolerated Catholicism being actively practiced, even in the SS – and this is a guy who didn’t exactly bite his tounge when he truly was intolerant of something.[21]

Inexplicably, Hitler’s name and image have been used in marketing in India. Maybe they’re trying to one-up the West for making the swastika such a stigmatized symbol? Examples:

But the most newsworthy was (the now-discontinued) “Hitler Ice Cream” made by MVF Products.[32][33] Company president Neeraj Kumar insisted his use of Hitler’s name and likeness to sell vanilla flavored ice cream in waffle cones was not to glorify the genocidal tyrant, but to poke fun at a relative:

This is really not that surprising, as the world outside of Europe and Europe-linked cultures like the Anglosphere was little-affected by the Nazis. Hitler there is not synonymous with “pure evil”, and many know little about Nazi Germany or the European theater of World War II.

Follow this link:

Adolf Hitler – RationalWiki

Related Post

August 3, 2016   Posted in: Adolf Hitler |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."