Alan Dershowitz slams liberals for claiming Trump is …

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz blasted liberals over the weekend for trying to “undo democracy” by claiming President Trump should be removed because he’s mentally unstable.

Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, Dershowitz said that tactic from the left is “very dangerous.”

“There’s only one thing worse than trying to criminalize political differences, and that’s trying to psychiatrize them,” he said.

“These psychiatrists now who are trying to diagnose without ever having met the man, that’s what they did in Russia. I represented dissidents who they locked up in mental hospitals,” he added. “That’s what they did in China. That’s what they did in apartheid South Africa.

“How dare liberals, people on the left, try to undo democracy by accusing a president of being mentally ill without any basis?” he said.

Democrats and their allies in the press have openly wondered whether Trump could and should be removed from office through the 25th Amendment. That Amendment says a majority of the Cabinet can decide to remove the president once he or she is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”

That language was designed for use when a president is incapacitated, although Democrats have said it should be used against Trump.

Last year, Rep Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, said it should be used because Trump is “incompetent,” but legal experts say using it to end political disputes is a controversial idea.


Alan Dershowitz slams liberals for claiming Trump is …

Related Post

January 9, 2018   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."