longtime Dem Alan Dershowitz: "How … – insider.foxnews.com

‘Shut the F*** Up’: ‘Anchorman’ Producer Apatow Goes on Anti-Trump Tweetstorm

Washington State to Allow ‘Gender X’ Designation on Birth Certificates

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz sounded off on claims the 25th Amendment should be used to remove President Trump over his mental capacity.

Dershowitz, a Democrat who supported Hillary Clinton, said calls for removal are “very dangerous.”

“Theres only one thing worse than trying to criminalize political differences and thats trying to psychiatrize them,” he said. “These psychiatrists who are trying to diagnose without having even met the man. Thats what they did in Russia.”

Yale University psychiatrist Dr. Brandy X. Lee told the “Washington Examiner” that several Democratic senators and one Republican senator met with her after she published analysis questioning Trump’s mental health.

However, Lee’s statements have been found to violate the “Goldwater Rule” — an ethical standard set forth by the American Psychiatric Association regarding evaluating politicians or people they have not met.

“How dare liberals… try to undo democracy by accusing a president of being mentally ill without any basis?” Dershowitz asked of those citing Lee and others.

Dershowitz said the 25th Amendment — ratified in 1967 and delineating presidential succession — does not apply in this case.

He said former President Ronald Reagan appeared to be developing Alzheimers near the end of his term so a case could have been made for him, but reminded viewers that Vice President George Bush would have had to invoke the amendment.

Dershowitz said in Trump’s case, that duty would fall to Mike Pence and then require a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress to remove him.

Watch more above.

Former Dem 2016 Candidate: Let ‘Obsessed’ Trump Build Wall If It Saves DACA

Pirro: Comey Made Sure Mueller Was Appointed to ‘Cover Their Butts’

Read the original post:

longtime Dem Alan Dershowitz: "How … – insider.foxnews.com

Related Post

January 9, 2018   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."