Relegated To Fringe Platforms, White Nationalists Stuck In Own Echo Chamber – TPM

The internets foremost purveyors of racist bile facedan unprecedented backlash in the wake of the deadly rally in Charlottesville, Virginia earlier this month. White nationalistsand other hate groups werekicked off of mainstream social media and web hosting sitesin droves, pushing them ontoplatforms created to cater to theirniche audiences.

But these sites, such as anti-censorship crowdfunding platform RootBocks and WeSearchr, the crowdfunding site co-founded by far-right blogger and agitatorChuckJohnson, have little name recognition and limited reach. That creates mini-echo chambers where a self-selecting group on the far-right fringe can trade memesand fund each others legal fees.

It further pushes these people to the margins of the internet, not that they were anything more than marginal to begin with, Hatreon founder Cody Wilson told TPM in a Monday phone interview. Yeah, some of their stuff began to get purchase with Trump and campaign 16 but again its always vastly overestimated.

Hatreon, which describes itself as a platform for creators, absent speech policing, is a far-right take on Patreon, a platform that allows podcast hosts and other creatorsto solicit paid subscriptions from their fans. Wilson, whose primary occupation is runninga company that develops and publishes open-source gun designs that can be 3-D printed, told TPM he was sympathetic to the alt-right but personally was not right-wing. He said he created the platform so that the looseband of white nationalists, anti-Semites and misogynists who compose the alt-right could have a leg in this conversation and not be banished from the internet.

Jared Taylor, head of the white nationalist publication American Renaissance, complained of the terrible setback imposed by Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other large-scale tech companies in preventing leaders of his movement from reaching new audiences.

It is a reversion to the pre-internet days when in order to really have access to the public you had to own a newspaper or a magazine or a television network or radio station, he told TPM in a recent interview. The internet has vastly democratized this process and made it possible for people not just like us but like Donald Trump to bypass the gatekeepers. What we are going back to is a kind of snuffing out of dissident views. It reminds me of the Soviet Union.

A number of extremist activists and leaders interviewed by TPM were optimisticthat these new platformswould eventually gain more members and clout. But for now, the numbers speak for themselves.

Wilson claimedthat he spends $12 grand a month of his own money to fund Hatreon as a passion project, saying the site doesnt make money and estimating it hasapproximately 900 registered users. By contrast, Patreon has over 50,000 registered users and is on track to pay creators over $150 million in 2017, according to a recent company blog post. Facebook boastedsome 2 billion users as of this summer;even social media sites with comparatively smaller user bases, like Twitter, with 328 millionusers, remain central to the national conversation, especially in the Trump era. White nationalists cant get an accidental retweet from the President if theyre using a fringe platform hes never heard of, after all.

The refusal of companies like PayPal and Amazon to process payments from certain sites also limits fundraising options for thosegroups. RootBocks, for example, only accepts cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Dogecoin at the moment.

As Taylor observed, You cant make a living just accepting donations only in Bitcoins.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the site Virginia Dare, which features articles from white nationalist contributors, told TPM in an email last week that his site, which was booted from PayPal, was earning significant income from Google Adsense [and] Amazon before they purged us.

Companies have also been droppingthe domains of white nationalist sites and shutting down their servers, and thereve been claims of hacker collectives targeting those sites withspontaneous disruption of service campaigns. As Utsav Sanduja, chief communications officer and global corporate affairs director for Gab, a Twitter alternative popular among the far-right, told TPM, Weve actually been targeted by far-left social justice warrior mobs and groups that have been DDOSing us on a regular basis and trying to bring down our site.

Sanduja, whose Gab bio features a nod to Trump, insists that his site is run by and open to people from a range of ideological backgrounds who want to engage in politically incorrect discourse.

We want a discourse that is free and civil and peaceful as opposed to people getting censored and going to the dark web, where there is criminality, Sanduja said. Were trying to moderate it, essentially, this dialogue, and prevent it from getting violent.

Other sites are more focused in their target audience and demographics. TPM reached out to Pax Dickinson, who wasfired aschief technology officer at Business Insider for his racist, misogynist views andwent on to found Counter.Fund, a fundraising platform built by and for the wider Alt-Right counter-culture.

His response: Fuck you, Talking Points Memo bullshit artist, I wouldnt talk to you if you paid me.

Wilson, of Hatreon, was flip when asked about the long-term viability of these alternative platforms catering to white nationalists.

If they cant find alternative, theyre not mature enough as a group, he said. I think this severe reaction to them [from mainstream companies] is necessary. If they have something they really believe in, they should be able to overcome it.

See the article here:

Relegated To Fringe Platforms, White Nationalists Stuck In Own Echo Chamber – TPM

Related Post

August 23, 2017   Posted in: American Renaissance |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."