Bad Halloween Costumes: Anne Frank, Trayvon Martin, Kim …

Lets start with a rather uncontroversial statement: Its important to learn about the Holocaust, and Anne Franks diary is an excellent way to start. What seems more contentious, however, is the notionthat it would be a good idea to dress up as one of the Holocausts most famous victims for Halloween.

One online costume retailer recently discovered the hard way just how offensive many people findthat idea. pulled an Anne Frank costume for girls off its website on Sunday after being criticized for putting it up in the first place.

It is utterly inappropriate, offensive and quite simply beggars belief. The Holocaust is not a jokethis company needs to have a serious rethink,”Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust in the U.K., told The Jewish Chronicle.

Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, toldNewsweekin an emailed statement: “We are glad the Anne Frank costume was removed from the catalogue, but its hard to believe that anyone thought this was an appropriate costume for Halloween. It shows we still have a long way to go in terms of educating people about what happened during the Holocaust, and why this unique event in human history should never be trivialized.”

The online retailer pulled an Anne Frank costume from its site Sunday after it spurred criticism. The author Daniel Arenson posted a screenshot of the costume page on the EU version of the retailer’s website. Twitter

The costumewhich is still being sold elsewhere as a more generic World War II Evacuee Girl Fancy Dress Costume Girls and Child’s World War II Girl Costumewas marketed on as educational.World War II created some unexpected heroes, where even a young girl like Anne Frank with nothing but a diary and hope could become an inspiration to us all. We can all learn from someone like that!,”the description read. Ross Walker Smith, a public relations specialist for ( is listed as a brand of, responded in a tweet with a statement. “We sell costumes not only for Halloween, but for many uses outside of the Halloween season, such as school projects and plays,” he wrote. We apologize for any offense it has caused, as thats never our intention.

But this isnt the first time a company or individual thought it was a good idea to dress up as a victim and was slammed for it. Last year, started selling a Parisian Heist Robbery Victim Kit for $69.99 so that people could dress up as Kim Kardashian the robbery victim (though she wasnt mentioned by name, the details of the costume left little room for doubt). Less than a month before Halloween, Kardashianwasrobbed at gunpoint and tied up by a group of men at the luxurious guesthouse where she was staying in Paris. They reportedly stole $10 million worth of jewelry and other valuables. That costume also was pulled.

Sometimes, the costume is homemade rather than mass manufactured, but the outrage is just as palpable. In 2014, there were costumes of former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice that incorporated his arreston charges ofassaulting his fiance in an elevator, both with real humans and battered dolls playing his domestic violence victim. The year before, a Michigan woman who dressed up as a Boston Marathon bombing victim and posted a photo on Twitter was lambasted. She reportedly received death threats and was fired from her job. And 2013 also saw a Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman costume that, like some of the Ray Rice get-ups, caused offense for using blackface as well as for depicting a victim of violence for entertainment.

Since it keeps happening over and over again, it might be worth asking oneself before settling on a Halloween costume whether it casually portrays someone who was murdered, robbed, abused or targeted in some other crime. If the answer is yes, then the best answer to the next question”Is this a good Halloween costume?”is probably no.

See more here:
Bad Halloween Costumes: Anne Frank, Trayvon Martin, Kim …

Related Post

October 16, 2017   Posted in: Anne Frank |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."