One ‘Bachelorette’ Contestant Perfectly Explained Anti-Black Racism – HuffPost

The Bachelorette contestant Lee Garrett has drawn attention for his history of offensive tweets and antagonistic behavior toward black cast members on this season of the show, but tensions came to a head on Monday night.

While, for the most part, this churning stew of racial animus was an unmitigated evil, it did bring viewers at least one valuable moment: One thoughtful contestant explaining to Garrett how anti-black racism endangers black men.

After Garrett told the shows lead, Rachel Lindsay, that a black contestant, Kenny King, had been aggressive toward him,King confronted the smooth-talking Nashville resident about his insinuations. The conversation went nowhere, as Garrett continued to smilingly interrupt and condescend to King a method of infuriating his castmates that he admits to enjoying.

Later in the episode, however, Garrett had a conversation with Will Gaskins, another black contestant and one who very eloquently explained the problem with calling a black man aggressive.

Initially, Garrett attempted to win Gaskins to his side. [Rachel] asked me, she said, Lee, so whats going on with, you know, Kenny? And I was like, Uh, he was being aggressive. I was just being honest … what was your thought, when you heard that? Tell me thats not aggressive.

Gaskins remained calm, but wasnt having any of it. Im not gonna say the words, man, he responded, laughing.

Why not? said Garrett. If youre going to be honest.

Instead of getting upset, Gaskins, who told the camera that he thought Garrett was simply ignorant and totally out of his element, attempted to educate his fellow contestant on the basics of racist rhetoric.

When you call him aggressive, Gaskins explained, there is a long-standing history in this country of regarding black men in America as aggressive to justify a lot of other things.

Garretts response? So hes the guy who gets mad and plays the race card to justify everything he does, because he cant control himself.

Gaskins, ever patient, explained that King wasnt pulling a race card, but was likely quite offended by a very negative and potentially racially charged use of the word.

His well-worded, succinct explanations clearly werent having much effect on Garrett, whoonce tweeted that the NAACP was as racist as the KKK.

Still, we salute Gaskins who, it should be noted, is also very cute, extremely good at handball, and reportedly reads like six books a day. He gave an excellent, reality-TV-ready primer on how casually painting black men as physically threatening can result in very real, often fatal consequences for those black men. For those Bachelorette viewers who have stuck with Lindsays season despite all these shenanigans, Gaskinswords were either a welcome respite or a much-needed dose of social justice knowledge.

And for that,Bachelor Nation is grateful.

For more on The Bachelorette, check out HuffPosts Here To Make Friends podcast below:

Do people love The Bachelor, The Bachelorette and Bachelor in Paradise, or do they love to hate these shows? Its unclear. But here at Here to Make Friends,we both love and love to hate them and we love to snarkily dissect each episode in vivid detail. Podcast edited by Nick Offenberg.

Want more Bachelor stories in your life? Sign up for HuffPosts Entertainment email for extra hot goss about The Bachelor, his 30 bachelorettes, and the most dramatic rose ceremonies ever. The newsletter will also serve you up some juicy celeb news, hilarious late-night bits, awards coverage and more. Sign up for the newsletter here.

Read more:

One ‘Bachelorette’ Contestant Perfectly Explained Anti-Black Racism – HuffPost

Related Post

June 27, 2017   Posted in: Black Racism |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."