Archive for the ‘Alan Dershowitz’ Category

Malzberg | Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser In Court! – Video



Malzberg | Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser In Court!

By: NewsmaxTV

Visit link:

Malzberg | Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser In Court! – Video

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge Strikes Sex Claims Against Dershowitz, Others – Video



Judge Strikes Sex Claims Against Dershowitz, Others
Source: http://www.cnn.com/videos/ April 07, 2015 – CNN's Erroll Barnett speaks with Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz about having his name cleared of allegations that he and others had…

By: PigMine 2

Original post:

Judge Strikes Sex Claims Against Dershowitz, Others – Video

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Malzberg | Professor Alan Dershowitz: SC Shooting Shows Need for Police Body Cams – Video



Malzberg | Professor Alan Dershowitz: SC Shooting Shows Need for Police Body Cams
Legendary Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, Newsmax Contributor, Author of Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel's Just War Against Hamas, joins Steve on Iran Talks and if…

By: NewsmaxTV

Go here to see the original:

Malzberg | Professor Alan Dershowitz: SC Shooting Shows Need for Police Body Cams – Video

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

U.S. judge strikes sex claims against Prince Andrew

By Ray Sanchez CNN

(CNN) — A Florida judge denied a motion by two women to join a lawsuit against Prince Andrew and a prominent U.S. lawyer that alleged underage sex crimes.

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz was accused of having sex with minors with help from billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

Buckingham Palace denied the allegations, which surfaced in a court filing in January. So did Dershowitz.

In his decision, U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra denied a motion by the alleged victims — “Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4” — to join a lawsuit accusing the federal government of violating their rights by negotiating a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein without consulting them.

Marra wrote in the decision that the “lurid details” of alleged abuse were unnecessary to determining whether the victims could join the lawsuit.

“The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim … especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.”

Speaking of the allegations against him, Dershowitz said Tuesday: “I hope that people will now understand that they were completely false and made up, and, nobody should believe them.”

Buckingham Palace, which in January emphatically denied any form of sexual contact between the Duke of York and a victim it identified as Virginia Roberts, said Prince Andrew was informed of the latest developments.

“He is spending this week privately, before resuming his schedule of public engagements next week. Further details will be announced in due course,” the palace said in a statement.

More:

U.S. judge strikes sex claims against Prince Andrew

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Government Liable in Truck Death of Alan Dershowitz's Sister-in-Law

Marilyn Dershowitz Struck by Mail Vehicle in 2011

getty images

Published April 09, 2015.

A Manhattan federal judge has ruled that the U.S. government is liable for the accidental death of the sister-in-law of prominent criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

Marilyn Dershowitz, 68, was crushed to death by a U.S. Postal Service truck while bicycling with her husband, Nathan, in Manhattan in 2011.

The driver of the truck was charged with leaving the scene of an accident, but acquitted at trial in September 2012. The following month, the family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the government.

In a ruling late on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Sarah Netburn said she had found the government 100 percent liable for the fatal accident. Among other contributing factors, she said the preponderance of credible evidence introduced at trial demonstrated that the USPS truck driver did not exercise due care to avoid colliding with Mrs. Dershowitz.

The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, which represented the federal government in the case, declined to comment.

Netburn has yet to rule on the issue of financial compensation. Ben Rubinowitz, a lawyer for the family, told Reuters he expected damages to total approximately $5 million.

Mrs. Dershowitzs husband, Nathan Dershowitz, is a lawyer and brother of the prominent attorney and Harvard Law School professor.

Read more:

Government Liable in Truck Death of Alan Dershowitz's Sister-in-Law

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Alan Dershowitz sex claimed tossed out by judge – POLITICO.com

A federal judge has tossed out an anonymous woman’s allegations that a billionaire financier who pleaded guilty to sex offenses involving underage girls forced her to serve as a sex slave for renowned Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Britain’s Prince Andrew and other famous men.

U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra on Tuesday turned down an effort by that alleged victim (known as Jane Doe No. 3) and another alleged victim (called Jane Doe No. 4) to join a long-pending lawsuit challenging the legality of federal prosecutors’ agreement not to prosecute wealthy investor Jeffrey Epstein if he entered guilty pleas to state charges.

Marra seemed sympathetic to Dershowitz’s claims that he was gratuitously attacked in the legal pleadings. The law professor, who once served as a defense attorney for Epstein, has adamantly denied any sexual contact with Jane Doe No. 3 and contends that some of her allegations are impossible.

The judge didn’t attempt to resolve those factual disputes, but said they appeared to be unnecessary to resolving the question of whether the two women could be added as plaintiffs in the case.

Jane Doe No. 3 “names several individuals, and she offers details about the type of sex acts performed and where they took place,” Marra wrote in a 10-page order (posted here).

“At this juncture in the proceedings, these lurid details are unnecessary to the determination of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join Petitioners’ claim that the Government violated their rights under the” Crime Victims Rights Act, added Marra, a George W. Bush appointee. “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Government owed them CVRA duties), especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.”

Marra turned aside Dershowitz’s request to impose sanctions on the lawyers who filed the motion, Florida attorney Brad Edwards and former federal Judge Paul Cassell of Utah. However, Marra suggested that his decision to remove the sensational allegations from the court record should serve as some reprobation.

“Regarding whether a show cause order should issue, the Court finds that its action of striking the lurid details from Petitioners’ submissions is sanction enough,” wrote the judge, who sits in West Palm Beach, Fla. “However, the court cautions that all counsel are subject to Rule 11’s mandate that all submissions be presented for a proper purpose and factual contentions have evidentiary support … and that the Court may, on its own, strike from any pleading ‘any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.'”

Dershowitz hailed the ruling and called it a major step towards proving that the claims against him are false.

“It’s a complete legal vindication,” the famed defense lawyer said in an interview with POLITICO.

See original here:

Alan Dershowitz sex claimed tossed out by judge – POLITICO.com

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge strikes sex claims against Dershowitz, others – CNN.com

Story highlights Judge also throws out bombshell sex claims against lawyer Alan Dershowitz He asks a federal court to “strike” sex-related allegations against him A court filing says Dershowitz had sex with minors via Jeffrey Epstein; he denies it

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz was accused of having sex with minors with help from billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

Buckingham Palace denied the allegations, which surfaced in a court filing in January. So did Dershowitz.

In his decision, U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra denied a motion by the alleged victims — “Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4” — to join a lawsuit accusing the federal government of violating their rights by negotiating a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein without consulting them.

Marra wrote in the decision that the “lurid details” of alleged abuse were unnecessary to determining whether the victims could join the lawsuit.

“The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim … especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.”

Speaking of the allegations against him, Dershowitz said Tuesday: “I hope that people will now understand that they were completely false and made up, and, nobody should believe them.”

Buckingham Palace, which in January emphatically denied any form of sexual contact between the Duke of York and a victim it identified as Virginia Roberts, said Prince Andrew was informed of the latest developments.

“He is spending this week privately, before resuming his schedule of public engagements next week. Further details will be announced in due course,” the palace said in a statement.

Roberts’ attorneys were not immediately available for comment.

More:

Judge strikes sex claims against Dershowitz, others – CNN.com

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser …

Famed legal scholar and author Alan Dershowitz tells Newsmax TV he’s going after the woman who accused him of sexual misconduct after a federal judge on Tuesday ordered her allegations to be removed from an ongoing lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The lawsuit, filed in 2008, sought to undo an agreement between federal prosecutors and Epstein, who the woman said arranged the sex with Dershowitz and Britains Prince Andrew.

“We’ve been legally vindicated but my reputation has still been, unfortunately, tarnished in the minds of at least some people by a woman who just lied and made up a story out of whole cloth,” Dershowitz said on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

Story continues below video.

“I don’t know this woman, I never met her, and she made these false accusations, and there are some people who still believe it.

“The judge’s decision will go a long way toward erasing that but it’s like unringing a bell or as lawyers say, when you throw the skunk out of the jury box, the smell still remains. So there’ll still be a smell and I have to go after her and I’m going after her.”

Judge Kenneth Marra granted Dershowitzs request in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, Fla. to strike allegations from a lawsuit against Epstein, who in 2008 pleaded guilty to procuring an underage girl for prostitution and served a year behind bars.

That suit seeks to quash a nonprosecution agreement between federal prosecutors and Epstein, who the woman said arranged sex romps with Dershowitz and Queen Elizabeths youngest son. Both men vehemently denied the claims.

Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor emeritus and Newsmax contributor, who represented Epstein in his plea deal, said his team will now depose the woman, known as “Jane Doe 3.”

“We will persuade the world that she made up the whole story out of whole cloth,” he told Malzberg.

Read more from the original source:

Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser …

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge: Jane Doe Claims Against Alan Dershowitz Improperly Aired

A federal judge on Tuesday said lawyers representing alleged underage sex-abuse victims of Florida financier Jeffrey Epstein improperly aired accusations against Prince Andrew and retired Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz.

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra of Florida struck from the record claims against the British royal and the American lawyer that surfaced in a civil lawsuit over the governments handling of the Epstein sex-abuse scandal.

The allegations against Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz appeared in a Dec. 30 motion filed by the plaintiffs asking the court to allow two additional alleged victimslisted as Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4to join the suit.

The lawsuit alleges that federal prosecutors violated the rights of Mr. Epsteins alleged victims by not consulting them while negotiating and entering into a 2007 nonprosecution deal with Mr. Epstein, who was prosecuted only in state court.

In that December document, attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell claimed that Mr. Epstein forced Jane Doe #3, a minor at the time, to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz on several occasions.

Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz vigorously denied the accusations. Mr. Dershowitz asked the court to strike the claims from the docket and later filed a defamation lawsuit against Messrs. Edwards and Cassell.

Mr. Epstein is a former client and friend of Mr. Dershowitzs who pleaded guilty in 2008 to a Florida state charge of soliciting underage prostitutes and served about a year behind bars.

Mr. Dershowitz helped negotiate a controversial deal with U.S. prosecutors that allowed Mr. Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators of Mr. Epstein. The government never identified Mr. Dershowitz as one of the potential co-conspirators and Mr. Dershowitz on Tuesday denied being one.

On Tuesday, the judge said Jane Doe #3s lurid accusations against the second son of Queen Elizabeth II and one of Americas most prominent legal scholars were irrelevant to the merits of the lawsuit.

The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim, Judge Marra wrote, describing his order striking document as a sanction.

Read the rest here:

Judge: Jane Doe Claims Against Alan Dershowitz Improperly Aired

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Malzberg | Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser In Court! – Video




Malzberg | Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser In Court! By: NewsmaxTV

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge Strikes Sex Claims Against Dershowitz, Others – Video




Judge Strikes Sex Claims Against Dershowitz, Others Source: http://www.cnn.com/videos/ April 07, 2015 – CNN's Erroll Barnett speaks with Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz about having his name cleared of allegations that he and others had… By: PigMine 2

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Malzberg | Professor Alan Dershowitz: SC Shooting Shows Need for Police Body Cams – Video




Malzberg | Professor Alan Dershowitz: SC Shooting Shows Need for Police Body Cams Legendary Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, Newsmax Contributor, Author of Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel's Just War Against Hamas, joins Steve on Iran Talks and if… By: NewsmaxTV

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

U.S. judge strikes sex claims against Prince Andrew

By Ray Sanchez CNN (CNN) — A Florida judge denied a motion by two women to join a lawsuit against Prince Andrew and a prominent U.S. lawyer that alleged underage sex crimes. Lawyer Alan Dershowitz was accused of having sex with minors with help from billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Buckingham Palace denied the allegations, which surfaced in a court filing in January. So did Dershowitz. In his decision, U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra denied a motion by the alleged victims — “Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4” — to join a lawsuit accusing the federal government of violating their rights by negotiating a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein without consulting them. Marra wrote in the decision that the “lurid details” of alleged abuse were unnecessary to determining whether the victims could join the lawsuit. “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim … especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.” Speaking of the allegations against him, Dershowitz said Tuesday: “I hope that people will now understand that they were completely false and made up, and, nobody should believe them.” Buckingham Palace, which in January emphatically denied any form of sexual contact between the Duke of York and a victim it identified as Virginia Roberts, said Prince Andrew was informed of the latest developments. “He is spending this week privately, before resuming his schedule of public engagements next week. Further details will be announced in due course,” the palace said in a statement.

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Government Liable in Truck Death of Alan Dershowitz's Sister-in-Law

Marilyn Dershowitz Struck by Mail Vehicle in 2011 getty images Published April 09, 2015. A Manhattan federal judge has ruled that the U.S. government is liable for the accidental death of the sister-in-law of prominent criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Marilyn Dershowitz, 68, was crushed to death by a U.S. Postal Service truck while bicycling with her husband, Nathan, in Manhattan in 2011. The driver of the truck was charged with leaving the scene of an accident, but acquitted at trial in September 2012. The following month, the family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the government. In a ruling late on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Sarah Netburn said she had found the government 100 percent liable for the fatal accident. Among other contributing factors, she said the preponderance of credible evidence introduced at trial demonstrated that the USPS truck driver did not exercise due care to avoid colliding with Mrs. Dershowitz. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, which represented the federal government in the case, declined to comment. Netburn has yet to rule on the issue of financial compensation. Ben Rubinowitz, a lawyer for the family, told Reuters he expected damages to total approximately $5 million. Mrs. Dershowitzs husband, Nathan Dershowitz, is a lawyer and brother of the prominent attorney and Harvard Law School professor.

Fair Usage Law

April 11, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Alan Dershowitz sex claimed tossed out by judge – POLITICO.com

A federal judge has tossed out an anonymous woman’s allegations that a billionaire financier who pleaded guilty to sex offenses involving underage girls forced her to serve as a sex slave for renowned Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Britain’s Prince Andrew and other famous men. U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra on Tuesday turned down an effort by that alleged victim (known as Jane Doe No. 3) and another alleged victim (called Jane Doe No. 4) to join a long-pending lawsuit challenging the legality of federal prosecutors’ agreement not to prosecute wealthy investor Jeffrey Epstein if he entered guilty pleas to state charges. Marra seemed sympathetic to Dershowitz’s claims that he was gratuitously attacked in the legal pleadings. The law professor, who once served as a defense attorney for Epstein, has adamantly denied any sexual contact with Jane Doe No. 3 and contends that some of her allegations are impossible. The judge didn’t attempt to resolve those factual disputes, but said they appeared to be unnecessary to resolving the question of whether the two women could be added as plaintiffs in the case. Jane Doe No. 3 “names several individuals, and she offers details about the type of sex acts performed and where they took place,” Marra wrote in a 10-page order (posted here). “At this juncture in the proceedings, these lurid details are unnecessary to the determination of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join Petitioners’ claim that the Government violated their rights under the” Crime Victims Rights Act, added Marra, a George W. Bush appointee. “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Government owed them CVRA duties), especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.” Marra turned aside Dershowitz’s request to impose sanctions on the lawyers who filed the motion, Florida attorney Brad Edwards and former federal Judge Paul Cassell of Utah. However, Marra suggested that his decision to remove the sensational allegations from the court record should serve as some reprobation. “Regarding whether a show cause order should issue, the Court finds that its action of striking the lurid details from Petitioners’ submissions is sanction enough,” wrote the judge, who sits in West Palm Beach, Fla. “However, the court cautions that all counsel are subject to Rule 11’s mandate that all submissions be presented for a proper purpose and factual contentions have evidentiary support … and that the Court may, on its own, strike from any pleading ‘any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.'” Dershowitz hailed the ruling and called it a major step towards proving that the claims against him are false. “It’s a complete legal vindication,” the famed defense lawyer said in an interview with POLITICO.

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge strikes sex claims against Dershowitz, others – CNN.com

Story highlights Judge also throws out bombshell sex claims against lawyer Alan Dershowitz He asks a federal court to “strike” sex-related allegations against him A court filing says Dershowitz had sex with minors via Jeffrey Epstein; he denies it Lawyer Alan Dershowitz was accused of having sex with minors with help from billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Buckingham Palace denied the allegations, which surfaced in a court filing in January. So did Dershowitz. In his decision, U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth Marra denied a motion by the alleged victims — “Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4” — to join a lawsuit accusing the federal government of violating their rights by negotiating a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein without consulting them. Marra wrote in the decision that the “lurid details” of alleged abuse were unnecessary to determining whether the victims could join the lawsuit. “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim … especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken.” Speaking of the allegations against him, Dershowitz said Tuesday: “I hope that people will now understand that they were completely false and made up, and, nobody should believe them.” Buckingham Palace, which in January emphatically denied any form of sexual contact between the Duke of York and a victim it identified as Virginia Roberts, said Prince Andrew was informed of the latest developments. “He is spending this week privately, before resuming his schedule of public engagements next week. Further details will be announced in due course,” the palace said in a statement. Roberts’ attorneys were not immediately available for comment.

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Alan Dershowitz: I Will Now Confront My Lying Sex Accuser …

Famed legal scholar and author Alan Dershowitz tells Newsmax TV he’s going after the woman who accused him of sexual misconduct after a federal judge on Tuesday ordered her allegations to be removed from an ongoing lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, filed in 2008, sought to undo an agreement between federal prosecutors and Epstein, who the woman said arranged the sex with Dershowitz and Britains Prince Andrew. “We’ve been legally vindicated but my reputation has still been, unfortunately, tarnished in the minds of at least some people by a woman who just lied and made up a story out of whole cloth,” Dershowitz said on “The Steve Malzberg Show.” Story continues below video. “I don’t know this woman, I never met her, and she made these false accusations, and there are some people who still believe it. “The judge’s decision will go a long way toward erasing that but it’s like unringing a bell or as lawyers say, when you throw the skunk out of the jury box, the smell still remains. So there’ll still be a smell and I have to go after her and I’m going after her.” Judge Kenneth Marra granted Dershowitzs request in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, Fla. to strike allegations from a lawsuit against Epstein, who in 2008 pleaded guilty to procuring an underage girl for prostitution and served a year behind bars. That suit seeks to quash a nonprosecution agreement between federal prosecutors and Epstein, who the woman said arranged sex romps with Dershowitz and Queen Elizabeths youngest son. Both men vehemently denied the claims. Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor emeritus and Newsmax contributor, who represented Epstein in his plea deal, said his team will now depose the woman, known as “Jane Doe 3.” “We will persuade the world that she made up the whole story out of whole cloth,” he told Malzberg.

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed

Judge: Jane Doe Claims Against Alan Dershowitz Improperly Aired

A federal judge on Tuesday said lawyers representing alleged underage sex-abuse victims of Florida financier Jeffrey Epstein improperly aired accusations against Prince Andrew and retired Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz. U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra of Florida struck from the record claims against the British royal and the American lawyer that surfaced in a civil lawsuit over the governments handling of the Epstein sex-abuse scandal. The allegations against Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz appeared in a Dec. 30 motion filed by the plaintiffs asking the court to allow two additional alleged victimslisted as Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4to join the suit. The lawsuit alleges that federal prosecutors violated the rights of Mr. Epsteins alleged victims by not consulting them while negotiating and entering into a 2007 nonprosecution deal with Mr. Epstein, who was prosecuted only in state court. In that December document, attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell claimed that Mr. Epstein forced Jane Doe #3, a minor at the time, to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz on several occasions. Prince Andrew and Mr. Dershowitz vigorously denied the accusations. Mr. Dershowitz asked the court to strike the claims from the docket and later filed a defamation lawsuit against Messrs. Edwards and Cassell. Mr. Epstein is a former client and friend of Mr. Dershowitzs who pleaded guilty in 2008 to a Florida state charge of soliciting underage prostitutes and served about a year behind bars. Mr. Dershowitz helped negotiate a controversial deal with U.S. prosecutors that allowed Mr. Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators of Mr. Epstein. The government never identified Mr. Dershowitz as one of the potential co-conspirators and Mr. Dershowitz on Tuesday denied being one. On Tuesday, the judge said Jane Doe #3s lurid accusations against the second son of Queen Elizabeth II and one of Americas most prominent legal scholars were irrelevant to the merits of the lawsuit. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim, Judge Marra wrote, describing his order striking document as a sanction.

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2015   Posted in: Alan Dershowitz  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."