Archive for the ‘Anti-Defamation League’ Category

Montreal Gazette: Bill Surkis, B’nai B’rith and Child Porn

MONTREAL – The former director of B’nai Brith Canada in Quebec has been sentenced to serve 45 days in jail on weekends after pleading guilty to possession of child pornography.

Bill Surkis, 71, held his hands behind his back as Quebec Court Judge Céline Lamontagne said he would begin serving his sentence this weekend, from 9 a.m. Saturday to Sunday at 5 p.m., and following weekends. It is the minimum under the law.

“The existence of degrading and dehumanizing images will not be tolerated,” she told the court.

Surkis, the former academic dean at John Abbott College in Ste. Anne de Bellevue, was also ordered to perform 240 hours of community service over the next six months.

His name and DNA, however, will not be added to the national sex offenders registry and DNA data bank, as this would be “grossly disproportionate,” Lamontagne ruled.

He will, however, have to report to a parole officer for the next three years.

Surkis, also a former director of the Montreal Holocaust Memorial Centre, was arrested after he sent his home computer to a Best Buy store for repairs and a technician called police after discovering he had downloaded 21 videos of child pornography lasting eight hours and 43 minutes.

Most of the pornography on his hard driver, however, was of adults.

Surkis had testified he is sorry, ashamed and broken by the events, saying they “destroyed his life and his family,” the judge wrote.

iblock@montrealgazette.com
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Bill+Surkis+sentenced+days/3951681/story.html#ixzz17hGeXhjY

Fair Usage Law

December 10, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith President Bill Surkis Received 45 Days in Jail for 21 Child Porn Videos

Ex-Jewish community leader jailed 45 days for child porn
Published On Thu Dec 09 2010

MONTREAL—A former Quebec director of B’nai Brith has received the minimum 45-day jail term after earlier pleading guilty to a child pornography charge.

Bill Surkis will serve the time on weekends, beginning this Saturday.

A judge ruled in Montreal today that Surkis must also do 240 hours of community service and be on probation for three years.

The Crown and defence both agreed the 71-year-old Surkis should receive the minimum sentence allowed by law.

The former Jewish community leader pleaded guilty in May to possessing child pornography after he turned himself in to police a year earlier.

Police found 21 videos on his computer, with some depicting girls between the ages of six and 14 engaging in sex with adults.

The Crown wanted to have Surkis declared a registered sex offender, but the judge decided not to put him on the national registry and also did not order a DNA sample to be taken.

During his sentencing hearing in October, the grandfather expressed remorse and told court he was totally devastated.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/904716–ex-jewish-community-leader-jailed-45-days-for-child-porn

Fair Usage Law

December 10, 2010   Posted in: Affirmative Action News, AIPAC, Anne Frank, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Gaza, Golan Heights, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Multicultural News, Palestine, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Leo Frank Case

The Leo Frank Case – open or closed?

On April 27, 1913, shortly before the Atlanta Journal had printed all the events of the previous day, Leo Frank sketch in the Aug 1913 AC. a congratulatory article had already appeared in their pages: “Grand Opera Helped to Improve Atlanta’s Morals…the records at the police station will show that the past week has been the most peaceful in the history of the city for this year….Even during the Memorial day parade no one was injured…”

But while Mrs. Leo M. Frank (Lucile) and her mother Josephine Selig were attending the last matinee performance by the visiting Metropolitan Opera — of Lucia di Lammermoor — a different script was playing out in a dingy and shuttered 4-story building on S. Forsyth Street. What occurred in the National Pencil Co factory on that holiday afternoon would become a permanent and dramatic part of American legal, social, and political history, much of which is still not adequately explained after 95 years.

The 4-week Trial begins on July 28 with a jury of 12 men. This Site will present information and documents about the murder of Mary Anne Phagan (1899-1913) and possible solutions to the crime. We will analyze the Inquest testimony, the Court record, and much other original material in an attempt to finally explain what most likely happened at 37 Forsyth Street on Confederate Memorial Day, 1913. The basic books on the case will also be reviewed, including the most recent And the Dead Shall Rise. We welcome comments and suggestions, which may be sent to the Webmaster (Allen).

Leo’s letter to his uncle Moses Frank, dated Apr 26th: Click for larger version.The first “new” document, shown at the right, is the letter (Def. Exhibit 42) that Leo Frank purportedly wrote to his uncle Moses Frank (then staying in a NYC hotel) on April 26, and which his lawyers argued showed his calm state of mind at the time (“anything startling…”). Reuben Arnold (pencil in hand in above sketch) would argue at the Trial that it was written by Leo literally between 12 – 1pm that Saturday. Almost without exception, every book on the case (Golden, Connolly, Frey, Melnick, Oney) has referred to the “thin gray line” and stated that Leo’s “interested” uncle was himself once a Confederate soldier. However, extensive research reveals that Moses Frank never served in the US military, North or South, nor do any of his obituaries or eulogies (1841-1927) mention such a record despite a much later family belief. Moses Frank, an 1856 immigrant from Dudelsheim in Hesse-Darmstadt, had lived in Atlanta, on and off, since 1866 (when he married his first wife Jane Wilson Kelly), and had even been in that city the very week of April 21st (with his second wife Sara) – why was he being kept up to date so carefully about this regular annual event (“Today was Yondeff”)? Moses was about 72 at the time and would hardly need to be reminded of his own mortality (“smaller each year”)? In a Mar. 1914 jail-house interview, Leo Frank would not say that his wealthy uncle was a Confederate veteran, nor was this possibility ever broached at the Trial (it was suddenly offered – without proof – only in Oct. 1913, by Reuben Arnold). The location of that handwritten original, though shown in Court, is unknown and no photographic image of it survives. Solicitor Dorsey implied to the jury that this “exculpatory” letter was not sent at its apparent date or time, an issue entirely ignored in the extensive Leo Frank literature. Curiously, no one at the Trial (or later) ever referred to the fact, or the reason, that his uncle had been blind since 1907. And despite the mistaken claim of his presence in the Frey book (‘The Silent and the Damned’), Moses Frank was continuously absent from Atlanta for over 3 years (Apr 21, 1913 – Oct 1916). However, his exact whereabouts between Apr. 28 and mid-Sept of 1913, is still unresolved; he and his wife were ‘unavailable’ for the Trial and Rae Frank alone (in Aug.) said he was already ‘in Europe’ from where she had been sent Leo’s ‘Apr. 26’ letter (the outer envelope from ‘overseas’ was not produced). He did not arrive in Frankfurt until Sept. 15, 1913.

Albert McKnight’s Affidavit of May 26th; Click to enlarge.One of the most intriguing circumstances in the pre-trial development of this case involved a document signed by the black cook in the Frank/Selig household (Minola McKnight). Frank’s attorneys, would long argue that it was coerced by the police as a result of “third degree methods.” Since 1913, it has never been shown in its entirety, and we are glad to present it here. Also unmentioned in the last 9 decades is the sequence of events that led up to its appearance. Minola would make three affidavits in all (May 3rd, June 2nd & 3rd), but her over-night incarceration was specifically caused by her husband Albert’s statement made on May 26, and notarized on June 2nd (at the left). This description of events has never been cited, with only an oblique reference in the Samuelses’ Night Fell on Georgia (1956). The most striking sentence (and odd omission) is shown here for the first time: “Mrs. Frank had a quarrel with Mr. Frank the Saturday morning of the murder she asked Mr. Frank to kiss her good bye and she said he was saving his kisses for _______ and would not kiss her.” Readers may wish to consider its authenticity, as new light is shed on why Leo Frank “so thoughtfully” bought his wife a box of chocolates from Jacobs’ Pharmacy just before returning home at 6:30 pm on April 26th.

Foreman Lemmie Quinn on May 8.In his first recounting of Saturday’s events (with his lawyer’s approval), Leo Frank made a formal statement on April 28th. This response is usually portrayed as a continuous document, but it was actually derived from a series of detailed questions and transcribed in the police station that Monday morning. Totally unmentioned, by accident or design, was the ‘noontime appearance’ (Sat) of Lemmie Quinn, the long-time Metal Room foreman and Mary’s immediate boss in the Tipping Dept. Yet, in a surprise announcement on May 5th (at the Inquest), Leo Frank would claim that Mr. Quinn saw him at his office desk around 12:20pm, in a supposed (and failed) attempt to speak with (absent) head clerk Herbert Schiff (about a baseball bet). Coroner Donehoo was surprised at this sudden revelation, and he did not apparently know of Quinn’s previous statement to Mrs. Coleman (Mary’s mother) that he had not been at the factory at all that day. Nonetheless, despite contradiction from several detectives, Quinn would also insist at the Trial that he was indeed at the factory’s 2nd floor and saw no one inside but Frank (just minutes, presumably, after the murder). Leo had at first only said that he paid Mary her wages of $1.20 at 12:07pm – she was never seen again. How (and exactly when) Quinn’s helpful information came to light was never adequately explained.

Another remarkable element of this case involved the testimony of the black janitor, Jim Conley. There is much misinformation about him (both then and now), and even his age (27 or 29?) and (educational) background are given incorrectly by Steve Oney in his recent book. Jim was not born in Atlanta, he did not have two years of schooling (he was not listed as ‘literate’ in the 1900 Census), nor were his parents alive or working at Capital City Laundry in 1913. Although his own date of death is given as 1962 (by Harry Golden), no obituary or death certificate has been found for him. His last surviving sister, however, died in 1969 (from the original family of ten children). The report concerning a gun fired at Lorena Jones, Jim’s common-law wife, cited on Oney’s p. 120, is not factual and was based on a rumor deliberately spread (June 6) by Benjamin M. Brodie, in response to the recent Minola McKnight affair. Jim Conley’s official Arrest Record (w/ 7 offenses) was offered as ‘Exhibit T’ at the Trial, and was accepted as accurate by both sides; it does not show any such episode. Nor was the “incident” ever mentioned by Frank’s own lawyers, either at the Trial or during the numerous Appeals. How Conley was able to maintain his employment (despite his bizarre ‘sprinkling’) at the pencil factory for over two years (earning $6.05 per 55-hr wk) is an ongoing mystery, as well as why Leo Frank continued to review his many private watch-installment contracts.

Herbert Schiff in the AJ, Aug 11. Recently promoted to chief bookkeeper of the NPCo, Herbert George Schiff was only 20 years old at the time of the crime. The issue remains: was he truly expected to come in to work on April 26th? (such a previous arrangement would imply that no assignation between Leo Frank and any ‘lady’ was planned or likely). According to watchman Newt Lee, Mr. Frank reminded him several times on the day before (Fri.) to report for his own duties (on the Holiday) an hour earlier than usual, i.e. 4pm instead of 5pm, so that Leo could attend an afternoon ballgame with his brother-in-law. Yet when Newt appeared at the appointed time, he was instructed by Leo to leave the building until even later than usual (6pm), not take a nap inside, and “have a good time (at the Parade).” Mr. Frank had cancelled the game-date with Ursenbach by phone at 1:30pm. Schiff’s long-time maid (Emma Beard) said she usually wakened Schiff on Saturdays, but did not do so that morning. Yet when a call was placed from the factory by Alonzo Mann, Emma later said she was “unable” to rouse him and Schiff never reported for work that day (or even called back). Emma and Schiff would later recall this ‘summons’ as occurring twice, at 10:30 and 11am, but Mr. Frank described it as a single call, at 11:30am. Alonzo also said ‘once,’ but did not specify the time. We are left with the puzzle of why any call(s) from the head office were essentially ignored that morning, although Schiff had stated that he knew he didn’t finish all his weekly calculations by Friday evening. He was also proud that he had not previously missed one day of assigned work in five years (except for the Ohio Flood disaster in Jan.). To further complicate matters, there is some evidence that although a call was made, it was not about work but only concerned an early morning delivery of Schiff’s forgotten clothing. If this interpretation is correct, then Schiff was never intended to come in that Saturday morning. Sorting out what really transpired in reference to these call(s) will probably result in a conclusion no one will want…

A Program on the Leo Frank Case (with new documents) was presented at Brooklyn College on October 18, 2006 (IRPE) and on Faculty Day in May 2009. Please email Allen (below), or write to him at the Classics Dept. in 2408 Boylan Hall for further details.

Much more to come, including the search for the lost 7-volume Transcript…

http://leofrankcase.com/

Fair Usage Law

December 7, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations  Comments Closed

Leo Frank April 26 1913 to August 17 1915

Leo Max Frank, also stylized as Leo M. Frank or Leo Frank (April 17, 1884 – August 17, 1915)

From Brooklyn, New York, to Atlanta, Georgia

Leo M. Frank was a Jewish-American raised during his most formative years in Brooklyn, New York City. Frank later matriculated to Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, one of the State’s premiere Ivy League institutions. After graduating from his Alma Matter in 1906, Leo Frank drifted on and off through associated and affiliated jobs over numerous months. However, a visit to Georgia, meeting with family about a lucrative business opportunity, would radically change his life forever.

Life Changing Opportunities

On returning to New York City, Leo Frank prepared himself to embark on a sojourn to Europe for a 9 month apprenticeship in pencil manufacturing. Upon completion of the training, Frank returned to New York City and then shortly thereafter, relocated to Atlanta Georgia in the summer of 1908. Frank was soon hired by his wealthy Uncle, Moses Frank, to begin a career at the National Pencil Company, a newly invested family owned business, one that Frank had prepared for during his stint in Europe. Leo Frank eventually worked his way up to Superintendent, becoming broadly responsible for overseeing quality management, order fulfillment, shipping, accounting and paying employees. In 1910 Frank married into a prominent Jewish family, one who a generation earlier had founded the first synagogue in Georgia. Leo Frank hit the ground running and transformed into a rising star and prominent member of the Jewish Community, becoming B’nai B’rith President.

B’nai B’rith and Pedophilia

In modern times B’nai B’rith members have exhibited an ongoing, current and troubling history of pedophilia, including harboring child pornography, and Leo Frank would be part of that legacy, revealing the historical pedophile tendencies of the B’nai B’rith past. More than a dozen factory employees in 1913 would disclose Leo Frank was an aggressive sexual predator and child molester, who often made inappropriate sexual innuendos and propositioned numerous pre-teen and teenage child laborers for sexual favors. Leo M. Frank offered many of the children working at his factory short term opportunities to prostitute their bodies in exchange for money, as a temporary escape from their near slave wages. It was also discovered the factory was being used at various times for whoring, including after hours partying and orgies, under the winking eye of Leo M. Frank.

The Apogee

There were two factories Leo M. Frank managed, they were grueling sweatshops that employed Gentile, poverty stricken pre-teen and teenage girls and boys; these children from poor families, often worked ten to twelve hour shifts during the day, five to six days a week, in horrendous conditions and for meager pay.

April 26th 1913, Celebrated Holiday

In a shuttered factory on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, Leo Frank, payed off thirteen year old Mary Anne Phagan, one of the factory child laborers, she been laid off the previous Monday when supplies intermittently ran out. Frank lured Mary Phagan into the metal room, securely entrapping her on the false pretense of seeing if the supplies had arrived. Using Phagan’s potential job prospects as a species of coercion and manipulation, Frank bluntly demanded sex from Phagan, that is, if she wanted her job back, but when Phagan resisted him, Leo Frank bludgeoned, raped and strangled her. By his own statements and virtual admission, the beating, pedophile-rape and child-murder of Phagan, occurred, according to Leo Frank, precisely between “12:05 to 12:10, maybe 12:07”.

After Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan, Frank asked his lackey Negro custodian and watchdog, Jim (James) Connolly, to dump the body in the rear of the basement next a large furnace. When Frank and Connolly went back to Leo’s second floor office, Frank asked Connolly to ghost write murder notes as if they were being written by Mary Phagan while she was in the middle of being raped and killed by the Nightwatchman. The contrived murder notes evolved the Mary Phagan cold case into one of the most shocking and embarrassingly botched attempts to frame and railroad the heinous crime on one of Frank’s other employees, an African American named Newt Lee.

Frank offered a promise of $200 to Jim Connolly, if Connolly would stuff the dead body of Phagan into the furnace and burn the evidence, but Connolly partly refused. Connolly left the factory with $2.50 and a half-pack of cigarettes that frank had given him and went drinking across the street before going Home. Leo Frank waited around for Connolly to return on the promise of $200, but when Connolly never came back that day, Frank became terrified and more nervous than he had exhibited just after the murder and in an act of desperation, Frank scattered the contrived murder notes next to Phagan’s body in the basement and then went back upstairs to resume a poorly consummated clean up job in the metal room.

April 27 1913

After the body of Mary Phagan was discovered in the gloom of the basement by Newt Lee the Nightwatch, during his late night security rounds and a bathroom visit, Lee immediately notified the police. The Police and Detectives began an investigation, observing, and questioning countless associated and affiliated people, including Leo M. Frank. When Frank made a number of incriminating statements and foolish mistakes that gave himself away, the police and detectives became very suspicious and Frank became a prime suspect. Leo Frank was subsequently arrested, and later indicted and finally convicted on August 26 1913.

ADL of B’nai B’rith is Born in the conviction of Leo M. Frank

The Leo M. Frank conviction became the impetus and directly inspired the founding of the treacherous and perfidious spy and espionage group masquerading as a civil rights group, called the Anti-Defamation League ADL of B’nai B’rith in Oct 1913.

Leo M. Frank Remembered

Leo M. Frank is remembered as the unconvincing-liar, adulterous pedophile whore monger, lascivious sexual predator, creepy child molester, licentious freak, violent pedophile-rapist, dead child mutilator, vicious strangler and murder-framer, whose arrest, indictment and conviction for the strangulation murder of thirteen year old little Mary Anne Phagan on April 26th 1913 between 12:05 and 12:15, maybe 12:07, inspired and brought out into the open, again, the full extent of the Jewish peoples ongoing historical tendencies for perfidious tribalism, race war, criminal behavior and loathsome self-deception.

European-American Awakening to Jewish Supremacism

A permanently lucid moment occurred for the Host European-Americans as they became enlightened, self-aware and conscious of the Parasitic Jewish ethnoreligious collective which revealed its genetic secret of ultra-extreme unified tribalism, as if each Jew was a cell in a collective and borderless global Jewish Body, acting as a single militant-army-people, a totally unified sleeper cell of International Jewish people united as a Virus against a European American Immune system. Leo Frank reminded White people that the Jews have an eternal undeclared ethnoreligious race war secretly declared against all non-Jews.

Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (1913) and Jewish Supremacism

The indictment and conviction of Leo M. Frank became directly responsible for the formation of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, one of the most dangerous Jewish spy and espionage agencies in the world born from the deadly and subversive B’nai B’rith a Jewish Supremacist collective.

The ADL founding and Jewish community historical claims, state that Leo M. Frank’s conviction was an Anti-Semitic railroading and framing, part of a wide and vast Anti-Jewish conspiracy from Gentiles who eternally hate Jews. This claim of the Jews goes against the reality that Gentiles always allow Jews to come into their successful countries and prosper, until Gentiles learn and become aware of the genetically innate behavior of Jews.

After the death of Leo M. Frank, the Jewish Community elevated him to the status of high holy religious icon making him a Jewish martyr of Anti-Semitism, however for non-Jews, Frank has became an ugly reminder and symbol of the hate, contempt and emnity the Jewish Community historically and eternally holds for Gentiles who allow Jews in their countries.

One Hundred Years of Jewish Supremacism, Hate and Lies
1913 to 2013

The ADL of B’nai B’rith along with a national campaign led by Jewish groups have claimed and pushed to the world for a century that Leo M. Frank was convicted because of a vast race hatred Anti-Jewish conspiracy, this statement by the Jewish community is stipp pushed today after 100 years of an unrelenting Jewish psychological warfare against Gentiles, through every means of the press and media. This is despite years (1913 to 1915, 1986) of Leo M. Frank trial legal review by every level of the state and federal court systems, the Jewish Supremacists have twisted the Case into a kind of egocentric sadomasochistic aggrandizement. The final verdict of 100 years of Jewish Supremacism by the ADL of B’nai B’rith is that Jews are unable to live peacefully in Gentile societies. Moreover, in terms of 1000 years of Jewish Supremacism, that Jews are forever and eternally incapable of living with Gentiles without instigating war.

Appeals – Majority and Unanimous Decisions Affirm Murder Conviction by the Trial Jury

After the murder trial ended on August 26th 1913, Leo M. Frank commenced two embarrassing and estopel years (1913 to 1915) of Jewish Supremacism, with numerous half-serious half-baked legal appeals made to the Georgia Superior Court, Georgia Supreme Court, United States District Court and United States Supreme Court, every court carefully and meticulously studied and reviewed the murder trial testimony and evidence, every single court affirmed the murder conviction, with only 4 dissenting judges out of more than a dozen affirming Judges. See: Primary Sources Section.

As of 2013, Leo Max Frank is now forever and irrevocably PERMANENTLY GUILTY, by the ultimate unanimous Majority Decisions of the entire United States Legal System, which chose not to disturb the Trial Juries Conviction, and this fact brought doubt to the Jewish Defense position that an Anti-Semitic Mob climate terrorized the trial court into a conviction. The proof was that every court unquestionably 100% free of so called Mob Terror was able to review the facts, evidence and testimony in the case through a calm intuitive and legal lens by seasoned Judges, they affirmed the conviction as black letter, binding and settled law. Leo M. Frank had fully exhausted every possible appeal at every level of the State, District and Federal court systems by the Spring of 1915 on April 19th. Even the Georgia State Prison Board rejected a request for clemency on June 9th. On April 19th 2015, 100 years of absolute conviction of Leo M. Frank will be celebrated.

With every possible court appeal fully exhausted, Leo M. Frank’s last hope was using the flush bankroll of his legal defense fund which was made possible by advertising magnate A.D. Lasker and Adolph Oct the owner of the New York Times. With a swollen treasury of hundreds of thousands of dollars, a vast Jewish political bribery and manipulation machine was unleashed across the United States and even some major cities throughout Europe. The Governor of Georgia was flooded with 100,000 template letters in support of Leo M. Frank from people who never read the official trial record in the case which included: facts, testimoney and evidence. See Brief of Evidence in Primary Sources.

Frank had one last hope. A well greased Christian JewGoy (Gentile partisan of Jewish Supremacism), the criminal Governor of the State of Georgia, John Marshall Slaton who was in office from June 28, 1913 to June 26, 1915. Slaton would save the life of Leo Frank at the eleventh hour, as Frank was on Death Row registered to be lynched on June 22nd 1915 by Sheriff Mangum.

Commutation and Clemency June 21st 1915.

Well before the dramatic soap opera of the eleventh hour on the infamous day of June 21st 1915, the treacherous and criminal Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton, was made a senior law partner in the very firm representing and defending Leo M. Frank at his July 28th 1913 to August 26th murder trial.

June 21st 1915

On June 21 1915, one day before Leo M. Frank was to be hanged to death, John M. Slaton, when he at the exit as an outgoing Governor of Georgia, in an absolutely gross conflict of interest, commuted the death sentence of Leo M. Frank to life in prison. The clemency was based on a half-baked hokey commutation order that insulted the intelligence of the elite of Georgia, Southerns, Legal Scholars, Judges, Lawyers and the people of the United States of America, when compared against the 1913 Brief of Evidence.

July 17 1915 – Leo M. Frank Gets Shanked

An inmate slashed the throat of Leo M. Frank using a butchers knife. The wounds were slow to heal in the boiling and humid heat. Those wounds would split open again later.

Knights of Mary Phagan, Founding Fathers of the Third and Current Ku Klux Klan (KKK)

Two months later after the commutation, Leo M. Frank, was abducted from Prison by a group of men from the State of Georgia’s highest social, legal and political strata, they Knighted themselves as the Knights of Mary Phagan, they drove Frank 175 miles to Cobb County, and Lynched him near an intersection at Frey’s Mill. A mature oak tree helped fulfill the perfectly executed slow strangulation of Leo M. Frank just after the dawn dew kissed a rising sun on August 17th 1915.

Failed Exoneration 1983

The Jewish Supremacists, ADL and other Jewish groups attempted a Coup De Grace against the United States Supreme Court, District Court, Supreme Court of Georgia and Superior Court of Georgia, when they sought full exoneration for Leo M. Frank of the April 26th 1913 Strangulation of Mary Phagan. They based their official submission to the Board of Pardons on an affidavit of a senile old man named Alonzo Lonnie Mann who had been Leo M. Frank’s original office boy, who at 83 years old in 1983 had a mountain of medical bills and gave a contrived story about seeing Connolly carrying Mary Phagan to the basement.

The Badly Performed Hoax was denied.

Pardon without Exoneration – 1986

However, In 1986, the metaphorical Jewish AIDS Virus known as the ADL of B’nai B’rith and other racially conscious and treacherous Jewish Groups were able to pressure the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, to Pardon (Forgive) Leo M. Frank, but the board stopped short of exonerating (overturning Frank’s murder conviction) him of the strangulation of Mary Anne Phagan on April 26th 1913, sometime between the ten minutes of 12:05 and 12:15, maybe 12:07.

Binding Legal Precedent, Black Letter Law and Settled Law is the Murder Conviction of Leo M. Frank

After the conviction, every level of the United States appellate courts and judicial review systems from 1913 to 1915, 1983, 1986, affirmed the murder conviction of Leo M. Frank as absolute and unchangeable. To date Leo M. Frank has NOT been exonerated of the murder of Mary Phagan and the Jewish Community still wages it’s unrelenting pathological hatestorm campaign of lies, distortion, manipulation, spin, bias and half-truths over the Leo M. Frank trial, spinning the case through a wide spread media circus of absolute mendacious monopolistic manipulation (see the parallel of the contemporary Jewish position on the case as compared with the past). The years 2013 to 2015 will mark 100 years of a Jewish Hate Storm Against Gentile Culture
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Leo M. Frank the Venerated Patron Martyr of B’nai B’rith and the ADL of B’nai B’rith
* 2 Background to Jewish Historical Importance of Leo M. Frank
* 3 Biography of Leo M. Frank
* 4 April 26th 1913
* 5 April 27th 1913
* 6 Police and Detective Investigation – April 27th 1913
* 7 Coroners Inquest Jury, Wednesday, April 30 1913
* 8 Grand Jury
* 9 Murder Trial: State of Georgia vs. Leo M. Frank, July Term 1913
* 10 Detective Harry Scott
* 11 Leo M. Frank Testifies at his Murder Trial
* 12 Leo M. Frank, By Proxy, Confesses Murdering Mary Phagan August 18th 1913
* 13 Detailed Version of the Leo M. Frank Near Murder Confession: August 18th 1913
* 14 Murder Conviction August 25th 1913
* 15 Sentenced to Death by Hanging
* 16 Appeals Process
* 17 Detailed Chronology of Appeals and Events
* 18 John Marshall Slaton, Commutation / Clemency, June 21st 1915
* 19 Leo Frank Gets Shanked
* 20 Lynch Party
* 21 The Perfect Day for Lynching – August 17 1915
* 22 Execution Staging
* 23 Lynching Discovery
* 24 Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann
* 25 Posthumous Pardon without Exoneration – March 11 1986
* 26 False Accusations of Anti-Semitism by Jewish Community
* 27 See Also
* 28 Leo Frank Bibliography
o 28.1 Primary Sources on the Leo Frank Case
o 28.2 Secondary Sources on the Leo Frank Case
* 29 Secondary Sources Biased in favor of Jewish Community & Defense Positions
* 30 Historical Archives
* 31 Video
o 31.1 Videos taking the Jewish Community & Defense Positions
* 32 Music
* 33 Media News
* 34 Fiction
* 35 Newspaper Articles
* 36 Interesting Links
* 37 Tom Watson
* 38 ADL Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
* 39 Discussion Forums
* 40 Lynching Site
* 41 Georgia State & Government Web Sites

[edit] Leo M. Frank the Venerated Patron Martyr of B’nai B’rith and the ADL of B’nai B’rith

Leo M. Frank was president of the Atlanta, Georgia, Gate City Lodge 144 Chapter of B’nai B’rith and his August 25th 1913 conviction for murder was the impetus that led to the founding of the criminal organization known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, the League was started with $200 by its founding father Sigmund Livingston in October 1913. See the Anti-Defamation League article on Metapedia.

Jew York City

Headquartered in New York City, the ADL of B’nai B’rith has became one of the premier Jewish spy and espionage agencies, masquerading as a Civil Rights group. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith has made great inroads during the last 100 years undermining and destroying White Western Civilization through manipulative programming of law enforcement and political officials, enabling changes to the legal system which tend to work against preserving and protecting the creative Gentile gene pool. The ADL has criminally spied on lawful citizens and groups, including smearing and ruining the lives and careers of countless individuals who speak out against Jewish Supremacism and Jewish Terrorism. The ADL of B’nai B’rith are regarded as global smear and defamation mongers, including using the legal system against people to silence them. The ADL of B’nai B’rith is for all intensive purposes the Subversive social and left wing political wing in the United States of the right wing Israeli Mossad in Canada, USA and White Nations in General.
[edit] Background to Jewish Historical Importance of Leo M. Frank

The Leo M. Case is extremely important in the study of Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and History, because it has revealed and provided more proof about a historical pattern of the Jewish Community. Moreover, the Jewish Communities subtle and overt political and social war against Gentiles that has been raging for thousands of years, has at times throughout history been mostly subtle, by proxy or incognito, but during times of perceived conflict, their unending dirty war reaches relentless boiling and raging crescendos.

A Unique Chapter Amongst Thousands of Years, Thousands of Chapters of Betrayal and Treason

The Leo M. Frank Case also revealed a common theme and pattern recorded over the decades and centuries in the history of the Jewish people, that being, their collective, genetically innate, unrelenting and treacherous criminal behavior on behalf of their ethnoreligious kin. In this never ending story, filled with uncountable chapters, they forever use every means of bribery, big money, emotional appeal, subversive organizing, media and underhanded political coercion, in an attempt, to free a guilty member of their own race and most of the time attack Gentile Culture and White Gene Pools.

More than a Man, Less than a God. 100 Years of Martyrdom.

The Jewish Community, Jewish groups and ADL, along with their partisans, have spent every generation over the last 100 years transfiguring and transmutating Leo M. Frank from a violent pedophile-rapist-murderer and instead elevated him into a Jewish ethnoreligious Martyr of Anti-Semitism.

Jewish Media Control

For 100 years, the Jewish People and their partisans have been spinning and distorting the Leo M. Frank Case to the general public by every media means, as an Anti-Jewish miscarriage of justice, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Volumes of testimony and evidence supporting the guilt of Leo Frank has resulted in the affirmation of Frank’s conviction by over a dozen Judges and numerous Court Tribunals at every level of the United States Legal System who were authorized to review and Judge the case. These facts are never included in the dozens of books, articles, videos, movies, plays and other media the Jewish Supremacists have created in the last 100 years concerning the Leo M. Frank Case. See Leo M. Frank Secondary Sources.

Introduction is Complete

[edit] Biography of Leo M. Frank

Leo M. Frank’s Parents

Meet the Franks. Rudolph Frank was a Jew born in Germany (possibly trained as a Physician) who immigrated into the United States and Rachel Jacobs Frank was born of German-Jewish parents in New York City. [1]

Not uncommon at the time, an arranged Jewish marriage was organized and formed between an older gentleman and a young lady. Rudolph Frank and Rachel Jacobs married in 1881,[2] Rudolph “robbed the cradle” and was 16 years Rachel’s senior (ironically, Leo M. Frank was 16 years Mary Phagan’s senior when he raped and murdered her in 1913). Some years after Franks parents married they had two children.

Early Family Life – 1880’s to 1910’s

Leo M. Frank was born in Cuero, Texas (the small town was also known as Paris Texas) on April 17th 1884,[3] it was located about 100 miles from San Antonio. Before the Frank family left Texas, Rudolf Frank, served as the local postmaster and his mother Rachel (Rae) Frank, a young home maker.

1884. Back in the Summer of 1884.

At the height of the summer of 1884 a major change was about to take place, a move which at the time would have taken weeks of travel. The family relocated to Brooklyn, New York and little Leo M. Frank was barely three months old. Rudolph took a job in NYC as a traveling salesman. Some years later a sister, Marian Frank, was born in Brooklyn in the later half of 1886.

Education – Public Schools, Pratt Institute, Cornell University
1902 to 1906

Frank spent his most formative years growing up in NYC, he was educated at public schools and the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn. After graduating high school in Spring of 1902, Leo M. Frank attended Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. From the Fall of 1902 till his college graduation ceremony in June of 1906, Frank studied Mechanical Engineering and dabbled in numerous hobbies.[4] During Frank’s college years at his Alma mater, he engaged in chess, bridge, tennis, and played basketball for his class team. During his free time Frank engaged in fraternal activities and practiced amateur photography. The 1906 Cornell yearbook has Frank listed as a member of the Cornell Society of Mechanical Engineering (CSME). Frank was also a member of the Cornell Congress and the H. Morse Stephens debate. [5]

Employment

1906

Frank took a job in the summer of 1906 as a draftsman for the B.F. Sturtevant (Sturdivant) Company in Hyde Park, Massachusetts, 6 months later he returned to New York.

1907

In 1907 Frank began work for the National Meter Company of Brooklyn NY as a testing engineer and draftsman for about 10 months. Though Leo M. Frank was Ivy League educated at Cornell University, the best University New York had to offer, he was unable to hold down a steady job for more than ten months. Though that was about to change.

1907, 1908 to 1913, Big Opportunities in the South, briefly in 1907, and five years during 1908 to 1913.

Leo Frank’s millionaire uncle, Moses Frank, had suggested to Leo M. Frank that he should become involved in a potentially lucrative opportunity in the management of a pencil factory sweatshop in Atlanta, Georgia, that Moses had just invested in.

1907 October – Life Changing Event

In the middle of October 1907 his uncle, Moses Frank and associates, invited Frank to Atlanta and suggested that he come to work for the National Pencil Company in Atlanta. Frank agreed and after spending 2 weeks in Atlanta, returned to NYC momentarily and then traveled to Europe and then Germany for a 9 month apprenticeship, to study pencil manufacturing at Eberhard Faber.

Today Eberhard Faber is a name found commonly on pencils, pens and erasers in contemporary times. Faber built the first U.S. pencil factory in 1861. Faber was the last in a family of lead pencil manufacturers dating back to Kasper Faber, who died in 1784. [6]

1908

In August of 1908 Leo M. Frank returned briefly to NYC, left his home in Brooklyn, New York and moved permanently to Atlanta, Georgia. Frank was offered a high profile position in the Frank family business and he accepted it, becoming superintendent, accountant, treasurer and part owner of the National Pencil Company located in the heart of Atlanta, Georgia on August 10th 1908.

In Time, Rising to Superintendent, Accountant, Treasurer and Employee Payer.

When Frank become superintendent of the 37 to 41 S. Forsyth street National Pencil Company factory, his responsibilities were for purchasing supplies and machinery, accounting, operations, paying off employees and insuring the final production quality exceeded that of competitors. Frank was also made a part time general supervisor of the Lead plant on Bell Street. [7]

Leo M. Frank worked in some kind of prominent rising star position at the pencil factory for nearly five years (August 10th 1908 to Tuesday, April 28th 1913), before his arrest and during this half-decade (1908 to 1913) he had developed a reputation amongst the general public as a good, hard working man, but the perception of his character amongst a dozen or more of the pre-teen and teenage girls who had labored at the factory, was that Leo Frank was a creepy touchy-feely boss who was always making subtle propositions to the little girls working at the factory with money and making inappropriate sexual innuendos with the cash box. Sexual harassment was often the biggest complaint in the factory and industrial sweatshops of the time. Frank’s character would be described among some of the girls and other factory workers, who would testify against him, saying that Frank was a lascivious pedophile and a whore monger. Though the words pedophile and whore monger did not exist at the time, it was lucidly and vividly implied, more than a dozen employees affirmed it.

1910 – Marriage of Mr. Leo Max Frank Marries Miss Lucile Selig

Frank was introduced to Lucille Selig after he arrived and took permanent residence in Atlanta, though they had corresponded before they met in person. Lucille Selig came from a prominent and wealthy Jewish family of industrialists who two generations earlier had founded the first synagogue in Atlanta,[8] though Lucille Selig was very much different from Frank. Lucille was very much Southern and provincial compared to Frank, who was cosmopolitan, well educated and traveled. They were married by Rabbi Marx on November 28, 1910 at Hebrew Benevolent Congregation. [9] Lucille’s father was a salesman for the West Disinfecting Co., a maker of soaps and supplies. Before that, he was a liquor salesman.

1910 to 1913 – Boring Married Life

Leo Frank and his wife Lucille Selig Frank, moved in to live with their in-laws home, Mr. Emil Selig and Mrs. Josephine Selig, at 86 E. Georgia Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia. Though Leo Frank claims his marriage was happy, he was often whoring on Saturday afternoons at the factory and would sometimes throw after work orgies and sex parties with beer and soda for carefully selected child laborers. Frank, also described Lucille as his Big Fat Wife to one of his employees. Which might explain why Frank was using the factory for light whoring on the evenings and Saturdays and the factory also became available for other discrete whore mongers as long they were on the down low.

Rudolph Frank the Father of Leo M. Frank

Rudolph Frank born in 1857 turned 67 in 1913. [10] According to Leo Frank, using the eugenics terminology of the period, his father, papa Rudolph Frank, became an “invalid”, which was the reason why Leo Frank claimed his father, Rudolph Frank did not attend the 1913 murder trial in Atlanta, Georgia. [11]
[edit] April 26th 1913

Confederate Memorial Day, April 26th 1913, a celebrated and revered Southern holiday, between 12:05 to 12:15, Leo M. Frank lured one of his child laborer factory employees from his second floor office, down the hallway and into the metal room, there he bludgeoned, raped and strangled her to death with a cord.
[edit] April 27th 1913

At approximately 3:15 AM in the morning, the Negro Nightwatch named Newt Lee, during his lantern beholden factory rounds, discovered the mangled twisted body of a little girl in the gloom of the basement.

The dead child, was later identified by Grace Hicks the morning of April 27th 1913 as thirteen year old Mary Anne Phagan. Grace Hicks worked in the metal department on the second floor with Mary Phagan for about a year and was very familiar with her looks. Grace Hicks testified some very interesting details about the metal room, including the positioning of the dressing room and the layout of the bathrooms there.
[edit] Police and Detective Investigation – April 27th 1913

After police and detectives questioned Leo M. Frank, countless dozens of factory employees and arrested some affiliated people, all the evidence began pointing in one direction. Fifty Six hours after the body of Mary Phagan was discovered, the police and detectives had developed a very strong suspicion against Frank based the evidence and testimony they gathered. Leo M. Frank was arrested on Tuesday, April 29th 1913 at 11AM, it was the last day of his freedom.
[edit] Coroners Inquest Jury, Wednesday, April 30 1913

The official murder investigation wasted no time.

The coroner’s inquest began shortly after nine o’clock on Wednesday, the 30th day of April. The empaneled Jury hearing the testimony consisted of 7 men in total, 6 inquest Jurymen and the Coroner:

1. H. Ashford, 2. Glenn Dewberry, 3. J. Hood, 4. C. Langford, 5. John Miller 6. C. Sheats 7. Judge of the Inquest Jury, Coroner, Paul Donehoo.

The Perjury of Lemmie A Quinn

Concerning Leo M. Frank’s alibi, Frank said he had forgotten for the first week of the murder investigation to bring forward Lemmie A Quinn, foreman of the metal room, a key witness. However at the Coroners Inquest, Lemmie Quinn, came forward to provide contrived testify that sounded totally suspicious and did not pass the common sense test. Quinn said, he had come back to the pencil factory and specifically Leo M. Frank’s office at 12:20 to talk about baseball with Mr. Schiff, but Mr. Schiff was not supposed to be at the factory at all that day which was virtually empty, because it was a State holiday, Confederate Memorial Day and everyone was given the day off. The testimony of Quinn was meant to shrink the plausible time Leo M. Frank could have strangled Mary Phagan by 10 minutes. Quinns testimony also added eye witness testimony strength to Frank’s alibi which left him about a half an hour unaccounted for (noon to 12:30). Lemmie Quinns perjury, shrunk Leo M. Frank’s unaccounted for time from 30 minutes to 20 minutes when the murder took place, but it still left wide open the time frame Mary Phagan has come to Leo M. Frank’s office between 12:05 and 12:10, maybe 12:07.

Conclusion of the Coroners’ Inquest and Jury

Coroner Paul Donehoo and his Inquest Jury of six men empaneled, questioned over 100 employees and dozens of other various associated people. The week long inquest and testimony provided under oath, left very strong suspicion on Leo M. Frank when Thursday, May 8th 1913, the Mary Phagan Inquest drew to a close.[12]

Coroner’s and Inquest Juries Verdict 7 to 0

The Coroner and his Inquest Jury of six men voted unanimously 7 to 0 recommending Leo M. Frank be turned over to, and investigated by a Grand Jury of 23 men which included 5 Jews. Newt Lee was ordered to be held as a material witness. Deputy Plennie Minor delivered the unanimous verdict of the Coroner’s Inquest Jury to Leo M. Frank being held in the infamous Tower. Frank was sitting browsing a local newspaper at the time. Deputy Plennie Minor approached Leo M. Frank and told him about the unanimous verdict of the Jury, which had ordered that Frank and Lee be held for a thorough investigation by the Grand Jury! Newt Lee slumped his head dejectedly when the bad news was delivered. Leo M. Frank insolently replied that it was no more than he had expected. [13]
[edit] Grand Jury

Two hundred factory workers and affiliated witnesses were subpoenaed.

On May 24th 1913, the day the Grand Jury of twenty three men were to vote after an exhaustive review of testimony and evidence concerning Leo M. Frank. Two Grand Jurors where not present on the day of the vote, George Gershon, a Jew went to New York City and M. Beutell, a Gentile, had an important event he was unable to miss, as these two men were out of town, it reduced the Grand Jury from 23 to 21 men. The importance of this reduction was that only a majority of 11 instead of the former 12 votes were necessary to indict.

Even though the Grand Jury was filled with businessmen and several Jews, they were not sympathetic and the evidence was overwhelmingly strong. With twenty-one men remaining, some observers may have wondered if vote was sitting on the fence, and would the majority of 11 would come forward and vote for an indictment. In a result that set a powerful tone for the future of the trial, the Grand Jury voted unanimously 21 to 0 in favor of indicting Leo M. Frank for the murder of little Mary Phagan. With four Jews voting unanimously with seventeen other Gentile men to Indict Leo M. Frank, it put serious doubts about the Jewish Communities historical and contemporary race hate claims that the Leo M. Frank Case was a vast anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic conspiracy.

The indictment read..

In the name and behalf of the citizens of Georgia, charge and accuse Leo M. Frank, of the [Fulton] County and State [of Georgia] aforesaid, with the offense of Murder, for that the said Leo M. Frank in the County aforesaid on the 26th day of April in the year of our Lord Nineteen Hundred and thirteen, with force and arms did unlawfully and with malice aforethought kill and murder one Mary Phagan by then and there choking her, the said Mary Phagan, with a cord place around her neck contrary to the laws of said State, the good order, peace and dignity thereof.

The Twenty one men present on the Grand Jury, which now included 4 Jews unanimously 21 to 0 voted to indict Leo M. Frank for the murder of Mary Phagan by strangulation because the evidence was clear, convincing and overwhelming. Twenty one Jurymen unanimously signed the indictment requiring Leo M. Frank to be held and reviewed by trial with a cohort of 13 men, a Judge and a petite Jury of 12 men.
[edit] Murder Trial: State of Georgia vs. Leo M. Frank, July Term 1913

The Chief Defense Lawyers: Reuben Arnold, Herbert Haas, Stiles Hopkins, and Luther Z. Rosser, plus an auxiliary team of 4 lawyers and the Chief Prosecutors were Hugh Dorsey, Frank Arthur Hooper, and Edward A. Stephens, with Judge Leonard Strickland Roan presiding over the court.

The Leo Frank Defense and Georgia State Prosecution team were given nearly 2 months of time to build their cases.

On July 28th 1913, a grueling 29 day trial began which would be the longest murder trial in history of the South for an individual.
[edit] Detective Harry Scott

Murder Trial Testimony

Detective Harry Scott, Superintendent of the National Pinkerton Detective Agency

The superintendent of the pinkerton detective agency, Harry Scott, at the trial testified:

On Sunday, May 3, I went to Frank’s cell at the jail with detective Black, and asked Mr. Leo M. Frank if, from the time he arrived at the factory from Montag Bros. (before noon) up until 12:50 p.m., the time he went upstairs to the fourth floor, was he inside of his (second floor) office the entire time, and Frank stated, ‘Yes’, Then I asked him if he was inside his (second floor) office every minute from noon until 12:30, and he said, ‘Yes’

Monteen stover on May 10th would crack franks alibi, till Frank’s virtual confession on August 18th 1913.
[edit] Leo M. Frank Testifies at his Murder Trial

Frank’s testimony

Frank spoke on his own behalf by making an unsworn statement as allowed by Georgia Code, Section 1036; it did not permit any cross-examination without his consent, and no cross-examination occurred. He began by describing his preparation of the payroll records on Friday, April 25. In rebuttal of a claim that another employee had attempted to collect Mary Phagan’s check that day, Frank stated that “No one came into my office who asked me for a pay envelope or for the pay of another. Frank’s statement was in direct contradiction to other employees testimony who testified they had collected other employees pay in the past.

Frank then went on, spending 3.5 hours of his 4 hour speech, describing in boring and mind numbing details the minutia of his accounting activities on Saturday, the day of the murder. Author Steve Oney writes:

Frank’s presentation, dispassionate and cool, was the antithesis of Jim Conley’s testimony. But rather than continue in this same formal yet accessible manner, the superintendent plunged into the fine points of the dozen or so invoices. Evidently he believed he needed to establish that the work was so involved that it had required him, just as several witnesses had sworn, to defer the all-important financial sheet until the afternoon. Yet from the start there was something unnerving about the resulting assembly line of details.

When a brief recess was called after Frank “had been ratcheting on for the better part of two and a half hours”, Oney concluded that he “may have convinced” some listeners on the time issue, but it was more likely that the audience reacted with “suspicion and disbelief”. If the testimony had ended at this point Oney believes “it would have been judged an unmitigated disaster.”

Frank provided an explanation of his nervousness after he saw the dead body of Mary Phagan at the morgue on Sunday April 27th, but he stopped short of explaining why he was nervous on Saturday afternoon, April 26th, the day of the murder, as testified to by Newt Lee the night watch. Frank also did not explain why he was acting nervous in front of the police on Sunday morning before being taken to the morgue, when the police first arrived at his residence, before the Police had told Frank about finding the dead body of Mary Phagan in the factory:

Gentlemen, I was nervous. I was completely unstrung. Imagine yourself called from sound slumber in the early hours of the morning, whisked through the chill morning air without breakfast, to go into that undertaking establishment and have the light suddenly flashed on a scene like that. To see that little girl on the dawn of womanhood so cruelly murdered — it was a scene that would have melted stone. Is it any wonder I was nervous.

Frank explained that seeing the murder on Sunday Morning April 28 1913 made him nervous, but Frank left open a wide range of time and didn’t explain why he was so nervous before the police took him to the Morgue, or why he was acting so nervous around Newt Lee.

Concerning the testimony by C. B. Dalton about Leo Frank and himself using Franks second floor office to meet up with prostitutes as corroborated by Jim Conley, Frank said

If Dalton was ever in the factory building with any woman, I didn’t know it. I never saw Dalton in my life to know him until this crime.

Regarding rumors about the reason why Lucille Selig, Leo Frank’s wife, had not visited him for two weeks while he was in jail, Frank proclaimed

The date I was taken into custody, my wife was there. But I thought I would save her the humiliation of seeing me in those surroundings. I expected to be turned loose and returned once more to her side at home. Gentlemen, we did all we could to restrain her… She was perfectly willing to be locked up with me and share my incarceration.

People did the equivalent of roll their eyes, as there was a shifting in the seats when Frank made the above statement.

In response to the testimony of Monteen Stover, that she was waiting in Leo Frank’s empty 2nd floor office from 12:05 to 12:10, Frank stated

to the best of my recollection I didn’t stir out of the office, but it’s possible that, in order to answer a call of nature, I may have gone to the toilet or to urinate, these are things that a man does unconsciously and can’t tell you many times nor when he does it.

Concerning the murder of Mary Phagan and the whereabouts and testimony of Jim Conley, Leo Frank stated

Gentleman, I know nothing whatsoever of the death of little Mary Phagan. I had no part in causing her death, nor do I know how she came to her death after she took her money and left my office. I never even saw Jim Conley in the factory or anywhere else on that date, April 26th 1913. ..The statement of the negro Jim Conley is a tissue of lies from first to last. I know nothing whatever of the death of Mary Phagan and Conley’s statement as to his coming and going up and helping me dispose of the body, or that I had anything to do with her or to do with him that day is a monstrous lie… The story as to women coming into the factory with me for immoral purposes is a base lie and the few occasions that he claims to have seen me in indecent positions with women is a lie so vile that I have no language with which to fitly denounce it.

Frank finished his 4 hour segment of testimony

Gentlemen, some newspaper men have called me “the silent man in the tower,” and I have kept my silence and my counsel advisedly, until the proper time and place. The time is now; the place is here; and I have told you the truth, the whole truth.
[edit] Leo M. Frank, By Proxy, Confesses Murdering Mary Phagan August 18th 1913

The Official Record of the Leo M. Frank Case Murder Trial Known as the Brief of Evidence.

On pages 185 and 186 of the Official Record of the Leo M. Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, July 1913 term, Leo M. Frank describes the events between Noon when he was working in his second floor office and 1:10 to 1:20PM when he left his second floor office to go home for lunch (Southerners at the time called what we call today lunch using the word Dinner).

Frank describes himself leaving his office one time with certainty from Noon to 1:10PM, when he went upstairs to the 4th floor at 12:50, to ask Mrs. Arthur White to leave, and to tell Mr. Arthur White and Harry Denham that he would be locking up the Pencil Factory Building. Frank said to the Jury he may have unconsciously gone to the bathroom to use the the toilet or to urinate, as the only other time he might have possibly left his office during the general time period of the murder. This was spine chilling testimony for everyone who had been meticulously listening to and studying the trial.

Noon, Twelve Oh Five to Twelve Fifty, Maybe Maybe Twelve Oh Seven is the time span of Mary Phagan’s Death

Before the trial, Leo Frank gave multiple different time frames to the Police, Detectives, Coroners Inquest Jury and Trial Jury as to when Mary Phagan came into his office, with the time varying between 12:05 to 12:15, maybe 12:07. At the murder trial Frank in a sort of aloof way describes (for the fourth different version) the time of Phagans arrival, saying Mary Phagan came to his office approximately 10 to 15 minutes after Miss Hall left his office (at about Noon) when the Church bell’s tolled.

NOONTIME – 1205 to 1215 is the Exact Time of the Murder Strangulation

Therefore it can be estimated by Leo M. Frank’s August 18th 1913 (4th different version) testimony that Mary Phagan came into his office between 12:10 and 12:15, a rough arrival span of time 5 minutes in length. Though earlier to Police, Detectives and Chief of Detectives Lanford, Frank had said Mary Phagan arrived in his office from 12:05 to 12:10, maybe 12:07. What Leo M. Frank did was lock the time of the murder down to 10 minutes, 12:05 to 12:15. The Prosecution would suggest the murder of Mary Phagan occurred between 12:05 and 12:10, maybe 12:07. Leo Frank puts the time of the murder of Mary Phagan at 12:10 to 12:15. The time span of 12:05 to 12:15 would be the whole struggle of the case, trying to determine what happened during this time?

Anti-Semite Tom Watson

Firebrand Tom Watson utilizing the ‘Official Record of the Leo M. Frank Trial’, solved the murder of Mary Phagan by quoting directly from Leo M. Frank statement to the Jury. A seasoned lawyers full analysis of Leo M. Frank’s own trial testimony is made in this seminal work. See: Tom Watson’s “Jew Pervert” September 1915 in Watson’s Magazine produced by the Jefferson Publishing Company.

Monteen Stover, Alibi Cracker

Leo M. Frank during his 4 hour trial testimony to the jury on August 18th 1913 entrapped himself beyond escape. Monteen Stover testified at the trial that when she went to Leo M. Frank’s second floor office to collect her pay, Frank was not in either his inner or outer office from 12:05 to 12:10 in the afternoon of April 26th 1913. Leo Frank testified to the Jury to counter Monteen Stover’s statement about his whereabouts 12:05 to 12:10, by saying he may have “unconsciously” gone to the toilet or to urinate. It was a terrifying moment for the people listening to the testimony, and the Leo M. Frank Defense team probably wished he hadn’t said he unconsciously went to the toilet or to urinate.

The Bathroom is in the Metal Room, So is the dressing room.

To go to the bathroom, one has to walk through the metal room. Leo Frank’s statement amounted to as close of a confession as possible, without coming right out and admitting it, that he murdered Mary Phagan. The short of it is that all the evidence the prosecution, police, detectives and metal room factory employees pointed to the second floor metal room as being the place Mary Phagan was murdered between 12:05 to 12:15 on April 26th 1913. They all witnessed and testified to the hair on the lathe and fresh blood stains that someone tried to cover up and hide on the floor. The factory workers early in the morning of Monday, April 28 1913, pointed it out before the police even noticed it. Some factory employees were acquainted with the factory floor of the second floor metal room as long as many years and had never seen that blood stain before.
[edit] Detailed Version of the Leo M. Frank Near Murder Confession: August 18th 1913

Where was Mary Phagan?

On Monday, April 28th 1913, only 2 days after the murder and one day after its discovery, Leo M. Frank spoke with police, detectives and Chief of Detectives N. A. Lanford. Leo Frank made an unsigned statement that Mary Phagan had come into his office sometime between, “12:05 to 12:10, maybe 12:07″[14] on April 26th 1913 – these were Frank’s exact words recorded by police and detectives.

Leo M. Frank denies knowing Mary Phagan.

Leo M. Frank made an unbelievable lie, he denied knowing Mary Phagan and this denial would take on greater significance at the murder trial when it was discovered that Mary Phagan had worked at the factory for about a year on the same floor as Leo M. Frank, having drawn more than 50 weekly pay envelopes from the accountant and treasurer Leo M. Frank, and that Leo M. Frank would have to pass directly within 2 to 3 feet of Mary Phagans work station each and every work day to get to the Men’s bathroom. Frank being a marathon coffee drinker would likely need to use the bathroom at least once a day during the 10 to 12 hour work shifts. Other factory employees would testify to seeing Leo M. Frank visiting the metal room daily to inspect that no one was loafing and that Frank spoke to Mary Phagan in a pursuant way.

Harry Scott, National Pinkerton Detective Agency Detective Working for the Leo M. Frank Defense Team.

Detective Harry Scott mounts the Stand to testify on behalf of the Leo M. Frank defense to the Court Judge and Jury.

Leo Frank told Detective Black and Harry Scott the superintendent of the Pinkerton Detective Agency, that he had, “been in his second floor office every minute from noon to 12:35 on April 26th 1913”. Detective Harry Scott, the Superintendent of the Pinkerton Detective Agency, was originally hired by millionaire pencil factory investor Moses Frank to work with Leo M. Frank and ferret out the murderer. Leo M. Frank made the wrong assumptions about Harry Scott’s loyalty and told him too much information.

According to Leo M. Frank, Mary Phagan Asked Him, “Has the Metal Had Come in Yet?”

Detective Harry Scott continued to testify representing the defense and at the trial testified that Leo M. Frank told Scott that when Mary Phagan had asked, “if the metal came in yet?”, that Leo Frank said he told Mary Phagan, “I don’t know”. [15] The statement created motion and motive to go the Metal Room to find out if the metal had arrived or not. The ‘Metal’ was the brass tips that go on the pencils, so they can hold erasers. Mary worked in the tipping department of the Metal Room.

Frank Created Motive and Motion to the Metal Room

The damaging statement made by Leo M. Frank to Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott enabled the prosecution to show a pretext in their case against Leo M. Frank, that he lured Phagan from his 2nd floor office into the second floor Metal Room. The Metal Room was a short stroll just down the hall, it was where Mary Phagan had worked for nearly a year, it was where all the evidence presented at the trial suggested Leo M. Frank strangled Phagan. It was the place where the ‘Metal’ had arrived.

Leo Frank was the last person to admit seeing Mary Phagan alive somewhere between 12:05 and 12:15. Leo Frank was one of three people that were in the factory that day between 12:05 and 12:15.

Leo Frank Claimed Jim Conley was Never in the Factory

Leo M. Frank claimed that he never knew Jim Conley was in the factory that day. Jim Conley would provide the most vivid testimony in the entire trial over three grueling days of testimony under the thundering hammer of Luther Rosser.

Monteen Stover, Star Witness Provides Evidence Solving the Murder of Mary Phagan

It was discovered when police interviewed Monteen Stover on May 10th 1913, an unimpeachable witness with an unblemished reputation, that she had gone to the national pencil factory building to also collect her pay on April 26th 1913 as many others had. Monteen Stover stated she had gone to Leo Frank’s second floor office and looked for him in his inner and outer office, not seeing him there and that she looked for him. Monteen Stover waited for Leo M. Frank from 12:05 to 12:10 and because Frank did not arrive, Stover left the building. Though during the time she was looking for Leo M. Frank to collect her pay, she pointed out something very interesting about the metal room.

Monteen Stover specifically stated that she clearly saw the state of the metal room door.

During this time period of 12:05 to 12:10 she had looked for Frank, not just in his outer and inner office, but that she looked down the hall noticing the door to the metal room had been closed shut. Because the toilet that Leo Frank had “unconsciously” gone to was in the second floor metal room and on the other side of that door that Monteen Stover saw was closed shut. It was presumed Leo Frank was behind that closed door with Mary Phagan securely entrapped.

Jim Conley, the admitted accomplice of Leo Frank

Jim Conley said he found Mary Phagan’s raped and strangled body in the second floor Men’s bathroom which is located inside the metal room, the very place Leo Frank had said he had “unconsciously” gone between 12:05 and 12:10 on April 26th 1913 (to counter Monteen Stover’s testimony as to why he wasn’t in his office).

The Murder Notes Point to the Bathroom in the Metal Room

The murder notes found in the basement also tended to point to Mary Phagan going to the toilet to “make water”. There was only one bathroom Phagan would have gone to and that is the 2nd floor bathroom if she had to go, because the bathroom on the first floor belonged to another company and the bathroom Phagan had gone to for the last 12 months she was employed at the factory was just a few feet from her work station. Had Mary collected her pay on the second floor and wanted to use the toilet, she would have used the only bathroom on the second floor, the one inside the metal room.

Unconsciously

Anyone who would have gone into the second floor toilet, because of the radical change in air, would have become very much conscious. The bathrooms were absolutely filthy and barely maintained by Jim Conley, the drunk custodian, and watchdog to guard for Frank’s licentious tryst. Imagine sharing 3 toilets in 1913 with nearly 107 employees during an 11 hour day, 6 days a week. One would definitely not be unconscious when one goes to such a toilet.

All the Evidence Points to Leo M. Frank

All the testimony, witnesses and evidence of Mary Phagan’s murder was leading to the metal room, as several factory employees witnessed and testified to a big fresh blood stain on the floor which someone tried to hide by smearing haskolene on it and Mary Phagan’s hair was broken on the handle of the lathe machine. Conley testified that he found Mary Phagan’s body there when Frank asked him to go and check on the little girl in the metal room.

With all the evidence in the second floor metal room, someone did not do a good clean up job and common sense forensics prevailed.

Jewish Criminal Activity

The endless criminal activity of the Leo Frank defense team, Jewish Community and lawyers including acts of witness tampering, bribing (countless examples and affidavits), threatening peoples lives (George Epps), mutilating (Minola McKnight the cook of Frank’s and Seligs had her face slashed open with a knife) and beating witnesses (Mr. Albert McKnight was beaten within inches of his life), did not prevail. Every court that reviewed the case saw right through the criminal activity of Jewish Supremacism.
[edit] Murder Conviction August 25th 1913

On August 25th 1913 a trial Jury of 12 men voted unanimously 12 to 0 to convict Leo M. Frank for the strangulation of Mary Phagan on April 26th 1913.[16] Add the Murder Trial Jury of 12 to 0, to the 7 to 0 vote from the Coroners Inquest, and 21 to 0 from the Grand Jury, and the vote is now unanimous at 40 to 0 (7 + 12 + 21). If Judge Roan affirms the murder conviction verdict, the vote count goes up to 41 to 0.
[edit] Sentenced to Death by Hanging

On August 26th 1913, Leo Frank was then sentenced by Judge Leonard S. Roan to be hanged by the neck until dead, may God have mercy on your soul.[17] Reuben Rose Arnold, one of Frank’s Dream Team lawyers charismatically quipped after the trial that it takes a Jury of thirteen men to hang a man.[18] Indeed, when Judge Leonard S. Roan, the Trial Judge, affirmed the Guilty Verdict, it increased the unanimous murder conviction vote from twelve to zero to 13 to 0. Frank would appeal to Leonard S. Roan to give him a new trial, it was denied and so Frank took that failed appeal all the way to the supreme court.

Execution Date Finally Set for the Birthday of Leo M. Frank April 17th 1914

Frank and his defense team would claim that Judge Leonard S. Roan was uncertain about the conviction, but there was no uncertainty for Judge Leonard S. Roan in a cruel sentencing, finally set the date for Leo Frank to have his neck broken by a hang mans noose on April 17th 1914, Leo M. Frank’s 30th birthday. Even today, Jewish Supremacists make the claim that Judge Leonard S. Roan was uncertain of Leo M. Frank’s verdict and cite forged documents supporting such an erroneous claim, they conveniently leave out the part about hanging Leo M. Frank on his birthday.
[edit] Appeals Process

Leo Frank’s conviction inspired the formation of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a Jewish espionage and spy agency masquerading as a civil rights organization, one which has been working to undermine and destroy White countries through political and legal manipulation.

Two Years of Half-Baked Court Appeals

Leo Frank then began a very expensive two year circus of embarrassing, poorly concocted and frivolous appeals. Franks lawyers and defense teams used every method of criminal activity on behalf of Leo Frank to create evidence to support him. They bribed and threatened witnesses, put forward and spun together half-baked frivolous court appeals through every possible legal channel, all the way up and down the Georgia State Superior Court, Georgia State Supreme Court, the District Court of the United States and the United States Supreme Court, multiple times ad nauseum.

Request for a New Trial.

More specifically, immediately following the Leo M. Frank murder trial, Frank’s defense team requested a new trial. The presiding judge Leonard S. Roan denied the appeal. Another motion for a new trial was denied by the Georgia Supreme Court in February 1914 after much review.

No Doubting Judge Sentences One to Die on their Birthday

Judge Leonard S. Roan, finally sentenced Leo M. Frank to be hanged on his birthday April 17th 1913, putting infinite doubt in the suggestion of the Jewish and Frank defense’s statements and forged documents, that Judge Leonard Roan had doubted the verdict. No genuine seriously doubting Judge would ever do something so cruel as to sentence someone to be hanged on their birthday.

Motion to set the Verdict aside as a Nullity

Beginning in June 1914, Frank’s defense appealed to the Fulton County Superior Court to set aside the guilty verdict. Fulton County Superior Court denied the appeal, as did the Georgia Supreme Court (December 1914) and the United States Supreme Court (April 1915). Ultimately Leo M. Frank had fully exhausted completely every possible court appeals process.

Georgia Prison Commission

As five courts upheld the original decision of the jury in Leo Frank’s case, Frank then applied for clemency with the Georgia Prison Commission to commute his sentence from death to life in prison. This application was denied.

Criminal Governor

Lastly, with absolutely no more court appeal options left for Leo Frank and the Prison Commission denying his request for clemency, there was only one last option, a commutation by the corrupt Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton. Frank applied to Governor John M. Slaton for Executive Clemency.
[edit] Detailed Chronology of Appeals and Events

The subsequent history of the Leo M. Frank Case, the Appeals to th Courts, the Commutation by the Governor and the Lynching of the Prisoner.

31 October 1913 – Judge Roan denied the motion for a new trial

17 February 1914 – the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the verdict of the lower court by a vote of 4 to 2.

25 February – the Supreme Court of Georgia, unanimously overruled a motion for rehearing.

7 March 1914 – Frank was sentenced by Judge Leonard S. Roan, for the second time to death by hanging on April 17th, Leo M. Frank’s birthday.

16 April 1914 – at the eleventh hour, an extraordinary motion for a new trial was filed and death sentence on Leo M. Frank’s 30th birthday again stayed.

22 April 1914 – Judge B. H Hill, former chief justice of the Court of Appeals, who had succeeded to the Judgeship of Fulton Superior Court, denied the extraordinary motion for a new trial.

25 April 1914 – The day before the anniversary of Mary Phagan’s death, Frank’s sanity was examined and he was declared sane.

14 November 1914 – the Georgia Supreme Court again denied a new trial.

18 November 1914, the Georgia Supreme Court refused a writ of error.

23 November 1914 – Mr. Justice Lamar, of the Supreme Court of the United States refused a writ of error.

25 November 1914 – Mr. Justice Holmes of the United States Supreme Court, also refused a writ.

7 December 1914, the full bench of the United States Supreme Court refused a writ of error.

9 December 1914, Frank was re-sentenced to death to hang on January 22, 1915.

21 December 1914 – United States District Judge W. T. Newman of Georgia, refused a writ of habeas Corpus.

28 December 1914 – Mr. Justice Lamar granted an appeal and certificate of reasonable doubt to the United States Supreme Court.

15 April 1915 – the Supreme Court of the United States, with Mr. Justices Holmes and Hughes dissenting, dismissed the appeal.

31 May 1915 – Frank’s plea for commutation of sentence to life imprisonment was heard before the State Prison Commission.

9 June 1915 – the State Prison Commission submitted a divided report to Governor Slaton, Commissioners Davison and Rainey voting against and Commissioner Paterson for commutation.

21 June 1915 – Governor Slaton Commuted Leo M. Frank’s death sentence to life in prison.

17 July 1915 – Frank was attacked by a fellow convict who cut his throat with a butcher knife. He lingered between life and death for several weeks, but finally recovered.

17 August 1915 – Frank was lynched from a mature oak tree.
[edit] John Marshall Slaton, Commutation / Clemency, June 21st 1915

John M. Slaton, Governor of the State of Georgia Betrays the People

On June 21, 1915, just six days before Nathaniel Edwin Harris, the new governor, was to take office and one day before Frank was scheduled to hang, Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life in prison. There was public outrage, John M. Slaton, a law partner and business associate of the Leo Frank defense team, in a complete betrayal of the constitution and his oath of office. The Southern population reached a boiling crescendo of rage, and were indignantly furious to a fevered pitch at the insolence of the clemency decision made on behalf of Leo M. Frank, especially after every level of the United States Legal System had upheld the evidence supporting the conviction.

John M. Slaton, feigned moral and emotional consternation, saying: “I can endure misconstruction, abuse and condemnation,” Slaton said, “but I cannot stand the constant companionship of an accusing conscience which would remind me that I, as governor of Georgia, failed to do what I thought to be right…. [F]eeling as I do about this case I would be a murderer if I allowed this man to hang. It may mean that I must live in obscurity the rest of my days, but I would rather be plowing in a field for the rest of my life than to feel that I had that blood on my hands.”[19]

Slaton’s commutation disregarded volumes of trial evidence and testimony against Frank, but Slaton also chose to not disturb the Jury’s verdict. Slaton, also suggested, that the Jewish Communities charge of race hatred as being the reason Frank was convicted was unfair, as it was certainly not true, because numerous other legal tribunals reviewed the evidence and testimony, and felt it was strong enough to convict Leo M. Frank.
[edit] Leo Frank Gets Shanked

17 July 1915 – Frank was attacked by a fellow convict who cut his throat with a butcher knife. He lingered between life and death for several weeks, but finally recovered. The wound never fully healed.
[edit] Lynch Party

Who Inspired the Lynch Party?

The Jewish Community often cites Tom E. Watson as the man directly responsible for instigating an extra-judicial miscarriage of justice after the Lynching of Leo M. Frank occurred. However, the people of Georgia, blame the vigilante necessity of lynching Leo M. Frank on the former Georgian Governor, John M. Slaton, a legal partner and member in the very law firm representing Leo M. Frank. John M. Slaton mendaciously committed one of the most brazen acts of cronyism and gross conflict of interest in commuting a righteous death sentence for a hideous crime to life in prison. Moreover there was wide spread rage because Governor John M. Slaton wrote and signed a 29 page commutation which tended to disregard the damaging testimony and evidence at the murder trial of ‘The State of Georgia vs. Leo M. Frank’ which led to a conviction, overwhelmingly supported by the members of every appellate court reviewing the case.

The elite of Georgia’s business, judicial and political system formed a Vigilance Comity, to ensure that the final judgment and fulfillment of the unanimous decision of the Coroners Jury of six men, the unanimous decision of the Grand Jury of twenty one men, the unanimous decision of the trial Judge Roan and the Jury of 12 men, and the 2 more years of judgments coming from appeals between 1913 and 1915 to the Georgia Superior Court, Georgia State Supreme Court, the United States District Court and the United States Supreme Court.

An elite lynch party of Georgia’s prominent members formed the ‘Knights of Mary Phagan’, they planned their prison break for nearly 2 months. The Knights of Mary Phagan began openly organizing a plan to kidnap Frank from the state prison farm at Milledgeville and take him to Marietta for lynching.[20] The organizers recruited between 25 and 28 men with the necessary skills. An electrician was to cut the prison wires, car mechanics were to keep the cars running, and there was also a locksmith, a telephone man, a medic, a hangman, and a lay preacher.[21] The Knights of Mary Phagan also had members who were of the highest strata of law and politics.

On August 16th 1915 at around 10:00 to 11:00 PM the elite lynch party struck and after nearly two months of careful planning, one of the most audacious prison breaks in U.S history was executed with flawless efficiency. The Knights of Mary Phagan walked into the milledgeville prison, armed and ready to tangle, without firing a single shot they overpowered guards, temporarily took control of the facility and abducted Leo Frank. Frank was driven all through the darkness of a soothing summer night about 175 miles to Cobb County to a sylvan knoll near Marietta Georgia called Frey’s Grove. The site was selected because it was near the former home of Mary Phagan.

The lynch party had fulfilled the punishment of the Judge and Jury. The people of Georgia celebrated, but it whipped the Jewish Community into new heights of ferocity and ugliness.
[edit] The Perfect Day for Lynching – August 17 1915

April 17th 1915 Happy Birthday

The date or “numerology” of the planned hanging of Leo M. Frank, was something that was debated for quite some time in the beginning of the two month organizing and planning to commit the perfect lynching. The number 17 or the 17th day, was very numerically significant in the day chosen for Leo M. Frank to hang.

In a perfect world, the lynchers would have preferred to Lynch Leo M. Frank on his birthday April 17th 1916, but it was too much time to wait and so they settled on the 17th day of the month of August. August was a significant month because it was when the original murder trial completed and the death sentence was rendered. The 17th of August was also significant, because it was one day before Leo M. Frank made what amounted to a murder trial confession on August 18th 1913.

European-American Congress has voted that, every April 26th is celebrated as Mary Phagan Day and every August 17th is celebrated as pedophile execution day.
[edit] Execution Staging

Cobb County Georgia

A few hours after dawn on the numeric day of 17, the day of the month Leo Frank was born, the lynch party setup their gear for the hanging. A manila 3/4 inch rope converted into a hangman’s noose was tossed over a branch the thickness of a mans thy, a wooden table was set up underneath the dangling hangman’s noose. Final preparations where made for the lynching, which included tying off the tail end of the rope to a nearby tree once the hang man’s noose was adjusted to the right height. The configuration would leave Leo Frank dangling 3 to 4 feet off the ground, there would not be enough rope room of a fall to cause the neck to break.

It would be a strangulation hanging for Leo Frank, followed by his neck breaking later from his body weight, however, Frank was not given a proper lynching where the neck breaks from the fall after the table was kicked away, instead the lynching apparatus was set for a slow dancing and wiggling lynch.

Last Words

According to the Jewish Controlled New York Times, Leo Frank was asked if he was guilty or not, he refused to confirm or deny it, instead Frank responded to the question: I think more of my wife and my mother, than my life. [22] Lucille Selig Frank and Rae Frank loyally flanked Leo M. Frank during his murder trial, both emotionally believed Frank was innocent. Leo Frank before the lynching requested his wedding ring be returned to his wife and it was later delivered to her anonymously. Frank also asked that he be covered from the beltline down, so as not to be hanged half naked and his request was obliged. They Lynchers wrapped his hips in a brown sarong.

A handcuffed and blind folded Leo Frank, with his legs bound with a short rope, was hoisted on the table with a noose around his neck, the rope was adjusted and re-tied to a nearby tree. Normally lynch parties often reserve a special kind of amputation surgery before they lynch a rapist. Ironically Leo M. Frank was spared and did not have his small Jewish penis and testicles cut off without anesthesia, despite the mostly overwhelming evidence he sexually assaulted Mary Phagan on April 26 1913 before strangling her.

After a preacher said a short speech and gave Frank his final rights, the table was kicked out from under him, and because there was not much room for the rope to jerk and break Franks neck, he instead wiggled and danced for a few minutes while he experienced strangulation justice for what Mary Phagan had to endure before her life was snuffed out. After Frank had been dead for some while, the vertebra in his neck eventually snapped, causing his face to swing and twist behind his body, though it was still fully attached. Leo Frank was given a proper execution for the bludgeoning, pedophile-rape, strangling and mutilation of thirteen year old, 4’11” little Mary Anne Phagan.

The lynchers departed not solemnly, but as Heroes with great pride for preserving the Jury system of the United States and for bringing Justice to a pedophile racist and collective Jewish Peoples who loudly cried internationally about a vast anti-semitic conspiracy.
[edit] Lynching Discovery

Leo Frank was lynched approximately at this location: 33°57’2″N 84°31’1″W.

All alone now, Leo M. Frank’s lifeless body twirled gently in the morning breeze of August 17th 1915, hovering between 3 and 4 feet off the ground. An early bird farmer on a horse carriage filled with produce had spotted the suspended body in the woods, he whipped up his horses and briskly arrived at a place to bring notification of the discovery,[23] however, others had already reported the kidnapping and informed the police who were on the hunt for Frank’s body in what amounted to a short and dirty wild goose chase. When news of Frank’s lynching reached the peoples of Atlanta and Marietta, the knowledge spread like wildfire and droves of Model T-Fords made a B Line heading to infamous execution site at Frey’s Grove. [24]

After Leo Frank’s body was cut down from the mature oak, one spectator stomped on his face and chest, Judge Newton Morris stopped him from doing so.

The lynching provided more canon fodder for the Jewish community, which has spent thousands of years fraudulently manufacturing exaggerated claims of Anti-Semitism. The Jewish and defense position evolved and spun a new chapter for Jewish Supremacists and co-religionists which thrive on persecution and victim-hood. For 100 years, the ADL, Jewish Community and groups have turned the Leo M. Frank Case into a mini-holocaust, they contend Leo Frank was railroaded and framed in a vast Ant-Jewish and Anti-Semitic conspiracy. Through the collective neurotic and soap opera Jewish mind, Leo M. Frank a convicted pedophile-rapist-murderer, had been transfigured into a Martyr of Anti-Semitism. Leo Frank became a new Jewish idol, symbolizing the apogee of Jewish victim-hood and persecution.

The names of those who took part in the lynching were not made public until January 1, 2000, when Stephen Goldfarb, a former history professor and librarian in Atlanta, took partial credit for a list he didn’t create and published an abridged list created originally by Mary Phagan Kean (the great grand niece of Mary Phagan).[25] The list contains several prominent citizens—including a former governor, the son of a senator, a Methodist minister, a state legislator, lawyers and a former state Superior Court judge—their names matching those on Marietta’s street signs, office buildings, shopping centers, and law offices today. [26]

William J Burns Detective Agency of New York

The persistent theme of the Leo M. Frank Case was Jew York City vs. Georgia. Detective William Burns the keystone cop style sleuth employed by the Leo M. Frank team, who was originally dismissed for being too obvious in his bribing, threatening and criminal activity, received a telegram from Marietta Georgia after the lynching of Leo M. Frank. The Telegram sarcastically told him to come down quickly and investigate the lynching, signed H.H. Looney Chief of Police. [27] William Burns had been driven out of Georgia with threats of lynching when it was discovered he was hired by big Jewish money to try to bribe any witnesses he could and turn the Mary Phagan murder investigation into a carnival side show with grandiose announcements in the local newspapers.
[edit] Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann

March 7, 1982,

An ugly chapter in the hoaxery of Jewish Supremacism was unfurled for the public. The Nashville Tennessean published a special breaking news report about a story in which Alonzo Mann, Leo Franks former office boy in 1913, said he saw janitor Jim Conley carrying Mary Phagans body to the basement of the National Pencil Company in Atlanta, where Mr. Frank was the superintendent. Mr. Mann asserted that Conley killed Mary and Frank was innocent.

1982, About 70 years after the murder of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Leo M. Frank, Alonzo Mann the former office boy of Leo M. Frank came forward in an other doctored up Jewish media expose pushing the Jewish Defense position at the behest of the Jewish Community. Now nearly 83 years old, the senile and ailing Alonzo Mann with a mountain of medical bills came forward to say he had seen Conley carrying Mary Phagans body on the first floor.

Alonzo Mann produced an affidavit seven decades after the Leo M. Frank drama, thus giving the Frankites more odious support for their position, but however, because of the Jewish Defense’s history of obtaining suspicious and questionable affidavit through criminal means and bribing to defend Leo M. Frank the affidavit was not taken seriously by anyone familiar with the case. Especially since, Alonzo Mann testified he left at around noon and in his old age had a mountain of unpaid medical bills.

Moreover, Alonzo Mann brought absolutely nothing new to the Leo M. Frank Case or Trial and his new testimony sounds fake, because Jim (James) Conley had admitted to being an accomplice and that he participated in bringing the dead body of Mary Phagan to the basement at Leo M. Frank’s request.

In a statement that makes absolutely no sense and does not pass the scrutiny of common sense, Alonzo Mann said, that the Negro Jim Conley threatened his life if he told anyone about seeing him and when Alonzo Mann told his family and parents, they allegedly told him to keep quiet about it.

Despite his taking a lie detector test and signing an affidavit, Alonzo Mann’s story lacks truth and veracity, because at the times Negroes were second class citizens, and no White Family or Parents would tell their White Children to be quiet about a negro allegedly murdering a White Girl. Even today in modern times, no White Family would ever tell a White boy to be quiet about a Negro murdering a White Girl.

The whole thing smacks of another Jewish orchestrated Hoax to add to the countless other hoaxes the Jews have perpetuated in the Leo M. Frank Case and everything else in their history.

However, the ADL of B’nai B’rith, American Jewish Committee, Atlanta Jewish Federation[28] and numerous other Jewish organizations used the affidavit after Alonzo Mann died to push for a Posthumous Pardon and Exonerate Leo M. Frank for the murder of little Mary Ann Phagan.
[edit] Posthumous Pardon without Exoneration – March 11 1986

Pyrrhic Victory for Jewish Supremacism

After pressure from the ADL of B’nai B’rith, and other Jewish Organizations, they get the Georgia Board of Paroles to pardon Leo M. Frank, but they would not exonerate him of the Crime.

Political Correctness Prevailed

On March 11, 1986, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles granted Frank a pardon, citing the state’s failure to protect him or prosecute his killers, though they stopped short of exonerating Leo M. Frank of the murder of Mary Phagan. Leo Frank’s murder conviction is still today black letter law and binding legal precedent. The Judge and Jury have the last word, as do the vigilante lynchers who were never prosecuted.

Pyrrhic Victory
Jewish Spun Pardon

The Jewish Community saw this at face value as a vindication, but it was really a Pyrrhic victory. First, because in order to pardon someone of a crime, the guilt of the individual has to be affirmed and indisputable binding settled law. So the Prison Board basically acknowledged the veracity and truth that Leo M. Frank was guilty and they refused to exonerate him of his guilt, though they forgave him of the Murder of Mary Phagan, because the state failed to protect Leo M. Frank and because his lynching prevented him from further appeals.

Further Appeals?

The prison board who would have a clear understanding of the law made a bald face lie. They were patently in error, because Leo M. Frank had fully exhausted all of his court appeals through every level of the State, District and Federal Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court unanimously overruled any further court appeals. The board basically affirmed Leo M. Frank’s guilt and quelled the powerful and wealthy Jewish Community, that has for 100 years has been vociferously screeching Leo M. Frank was a “noble and innocent Jew, Framed, rail roaded and scapegoated in a vast Anti-Jewish conspiracy”. For 100 years the Jewish community has transformed the pedophile-rapist and murderer Leo M. Frank into a martyr of Anti-Semitism, despite the black letter, settled and binding law and decision on the case.

European-American must organize to have the Pardon reversed.

[edit] False Accusations of Anti-Semitism by Jewish Community

According to Frey, Even after the Frank case had played to its tragic climax, Victor Kriegshaber, a German-Jew, was elected president of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, in 1916.
[edit] See Also

* Antisemitism in the United States

* The Gunsaulus Mystery (1921)

* Murder in Harlem (1935)

Articles about Jewish Biased Videos on the Leo M. Frank Case

* They Won’t Forget (1937)

* The Murder of Mary Phagan (1988)

* Parade (musical) (1998)

[edit] Leo Frank Bibliography
[edit] Primary Sources on the Leo Frank Case

Certified Legal Documents

* Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence. Only one original copy exists and it is located at the Georgia State Archive and numerous microfilm copies of this elusive document were made. These rare documents went online in 2010 for the public after 97 years of elusiveness. Ratified by both the Prosecution and Defense teams it captures the July 28th 1913 to August 25th 1913 witness testimony and evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense in the Leo M. Frank trial for the murder of little Mary Phagan on April 26th 1913.

* First Appeal, Oct 1913, Leo M. Frank Case

* Bill of Exceptions, November 15, 1913, Leo M. Case.

* Supreme Court of Georgia. Frank v. State. Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia at the October Term, 1913, and March Term 1914 PDF format 25.5 megs and 552 Pages. The abridged Trial Testimony of Jim Conley with Questions and Answers starts at around page 50/552 and ends at around 110/552. Write your review of these legal documents: Leo M. Frank vs. Mangum

* Some Leo M. Frank Appeal Documents

* Governor John M. Slaton’s Clemency Decision in the Leo M. Frank Case June 21st 1915. In a terrible act of treachery, the Georgian Governor John M. Slaton, a senior law partner in the legal firm representing Leo M. Frank, decides to commute Leo M. Frank’s death sentence to life in prison. Slaton, compares Leo M. Frank a pedophile-rapist and convicted strangler to the ManGod Jesus Christ.

* Leo Frank Clemency File, images of original documents related to the clemency petition, including abridged archive of Governor John M. Slaton’s notes.

Jewish Community & Defense Position

* Arnold, Reuben. The Trial of Leo M. Frank, Reuben Rose Arnold’s Full Address to the Court in his Behalf 1913 Introduction by Alvin V. Sellers. Classic Publishing Co., Baxley GA and The Trow Press, New York. Published in 1915, 69 Pages. Held at Internet Archive in adobe PDF 33.6M.

* “The Frank Case.” Collier’s: The National Weekly. 19 & 26 December 1914. Grossly biased in Frank’s behavior. See the photos in this article.

Prosecution

* Dorsey, Hugh. Arguments of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Leo Frank Murder Trial of 1913 Some, but not all of Solicitor General Hugh Manson Dorsey nine hours of closing arguments made on Aug. 22nd, 23rd and 25th, 1913, Atlanta Judicial Circuit. The Scanned book is located at the Internet Archive and available in Adobe PDF format 146 pages.

Supporting the Prosecution

Watson’s Magazine Published 1910 to 1917, Editor Tom Watson. Leo Frank covered in January, March, August, September* & October 1915.

* Watson, Tom. Watson’s Magazine, Jeffersonian Publishing Company, September 1915, Volume 21, Number 5, The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, A Jew Pervert. Firebrand Tom Watson, solves the murder of Mary Phagan, by utilizing the official Georgia State record of trial testimony given by Leo Frank. The official record Tom Watson is referring to in the title of his text is the elusive legal ‘brief of evidence’, known in legal terminology as, ‘Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence’, it contains the testimony and evidence at Frank’s murder trial which was ratified by both the ‘Leo Frank Defense’ and ‘Leo Frank Prosecution’ teams. An irrevocable blunder is made by Leo M. Frank during his own murder trial testimony to the Fulton County Superior Court Jury on August 18th 1913. Frank states what amounts to a confession that he murdered Mary Phagan in second floor metal room with an “unconscious” bathroom visit. Frank told his murder trial Jury he went to the toilet or to urinate, to account for not seeing Monteen Stover, a young white girl, who was waiting in Frank’s empty second floor office from 12:05 to 12:10 on April 26th 1913. Frank entrapped himself beyond escape, because in order to get to the bathroom, one has to walk through the door of metal room to then get inside the metal room, before one can reach the toilets. The prosecution spent 29 days trying to prove to the Jury that Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the Metal Room between 12:05 to 12:15 on April 26th 1913. Leo M. Frank essentially confessed to murdering Mary Phagan between 12:05 to 12:15 on April 26th 1913.

* Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* Watson’s Magazine August 1915 volume 21 no. 4 featuring Leo Frank Mary Phagan Murder Trial A review of the Leo Frank trial by Tom Watson. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert, September 1915 By Tom Watson, of historical importance. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* Rich Jews Indict the State of Georgia (October, 1915) By Tom Watson, historically important. Tom Watson exposes the big money Jewish Community.

Jeffersonian Magazine (Published from 1907 to 1917, Editor Tom Watson)

* The Jeffersonian. 17 December 1914. “Leo Frank Sentenced Again” Magazine article. Teaser.

* The Jeffersonian. 25 March 1915. “The Leo Frank Case Still Raging in Northern Papers” Magazine article. Teaser.

[edit] Secondary Sources on the Leo Frank Case

Supporting the Prosecution

Watson’s Magazine Published 1910 to 1917, Editor Tom Watson. Leo Frank covered in January, March, August, September* & October 1915.

* Watson, Tom. Watson’s Magazine, Jeffersonian Publishing Company, September 1915, Volume 21, Number 5, The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, A Jew Pervert. Firebrand Tom Watson, solves the murder of Mary Phagan, by utilizing the official Georgia State record of trial testimony given by Leo Frank. The official record Tom Watson is referring to in the title of his text is the elusive legal ‘brief of evidence’, known in legal terminology as, ‘Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913. Brief of Evidence’, it contains the testimony and evidence at Frank’s murder trial which was ratified by both the ‘Leo Frank Defense’ and ‘Leo Frank Prosecution’ teams. An irrevocable blunder is made by Leo M. Frank during his own murder trial testimony to the Fulton County Superior Court Jury on August 18th 1913. Frank states what amounts to a confession that he murdered Mary Phagan in second floor metal room with an “unconscious” bathroom visit. Frank told his murder trial Jury he went to the toilet or to urinate, to account for not seeing Monteen Stover, a young white girl, who was waiting in Frank’s empty second floor office from 12:05 to 12:10 on April 26th 1913. Frank entrapped himself beyond escape, because in order to get to the bathroom, one has to walk through the door of metal room to then get inside the metal room, before one can reach the toilets. The prosecution spent 29 days trying to prove to the Jury that Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the Metal Room between 12:05 to 12:15 on April 26th 1913. Leo M. Frank essentially confessed to murdering Mary Phagan between 12:05 to 12:15 on April 26th 1913.

* Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* Watson’s Magazine August 1915 volume 21 no. 4 featuring Leo Frank Mary Phagan Murder Trial A review of the Leo Frank trial by Tom Watson. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert, September 1915 By Tom Watson, of historical importance. Available online in adobe PDF format for download from archive.org.

* Rich Jews Indict the State of Georgia (October, 1915) By Tom Watson, historically important. Tom Watson exposes the big money Jewish Community.

Jeffersonian Magazine (Published from 1907 to 1917, Editor Tom Watson)

* The Jeffersonian. 17 December 1914. “Leo Frank Sentenced Again” Magazine article. Teaser.

* The Jeffersonian. 25 March 1915. “The Leo Frank Case Still Raging in Northern Papers” Magazine article. Teaser.

Neutral

* Kean, Mary Phagan. “The Murder of Little Mary Phagan”. New Horizon Press, 1987.

* “The Frank Case” The Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery, published anonymously, Atlanta Publishing Company, 1913. The first book published on the Leo M. Frank murder trial. 144 Pages. Adobe Acrobat PDF [1] 15 megs

* Lawson, John Davison (ed.). American State Trials Volume X (1918) contains the abridged trial testimony starting on p. 182. This document also contains the rare and ellusive closing arguments of the Leo M. Frank defense team and prosecution team. *Required Reading.

* The Leo Frank Case: New Documents Found.

* The Leo M. Frank Case an archive and library of rare images, books, articles, books and videos.

[edit] Secondary Sources Biased in favor of Jewish Community & Defense Positions

* Lindemann, Albert S. The Jew Accused: Three Anti-Semitic Affairs (Drevfus, Beilis, Frank), 1894-1915. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Wikipedia is a bastion of Jewish Supremacism

* Jewish Supremacism and Leftist Controlled Wikipedia, Extremely Biased in the Leo Max Frank Case on behalf of Leo M. Frank @ www.WIKIPEDIA.org/Leo-Frank-Case

Jewish Defense Side of the Leo M. Frank Case and Trial

* Oney, Steve And the Dead Shall Rise: The Murder of Mary Phagan and the Lynching of Leo Frank published by Pantheon Books in 2003, New York, 742 pages. Available for download in Adobe PDF format from Internet Archive.

* Gaines, Luan. Review of Stephen Oney, And the Dead Shall Rise: The Murder of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Leo Frank

* Dinnerstein, Leonard The Leo Frank Case written by Jewish Left Wing University of Arizona Professor, Dr. Leonard Dinnerstein, who did his dissertation on the subject and who often distorts and exaggerates claims of Anti-Semitism in history. Originally published in New York, Columbia University Press, 1966, 1968. New edition published in Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press, 1987. Available for download in Adobe PDF format from archive.org

* Dinnerstein, Leonard. “The Fate of Leo Frank”, American Heritage, 47, October 1996, pp. 98–109.

* Wilkes, Donald E., Jr. “Politics, Prejudice, and Perjury”, University of Georgia School of Law; also see “Wrongly Accused, Falsely Convicted, Wantonly Murdered”, University of Georgia School of Law.

* Collier’s: The National Weekly. Vol. 54, No. 14 (19 December 1914) and No. 15 (26 December 1914)

* Frey, Robert Seitz and Nancy Thompson-Frey (2002). The Silent and the Damned: The Murder of Mary Phagan and the Lynching of Leo Frank. New York: Madison Books, 1988. (Biased history of the case by two well-known Jewish writers, including the story of the 1986 pardon)

* Goldfarb, Stephen J. “Framed.” American Heritage. October 1996, 108-113. (Evidence from the November 1915 trial of the Pinkerton Detective Agency v. National Pencil Company, for non-payment of bills, indicates that the agency actively worked against its client, Leo Frank, to have him found guilty of murder)

* Garrett, Franklin M., Atlanta and Environs: A Chronicle of Its People and Events. Volume II, Athens, GA. University of Georgia Press, 1954, pp. 619-628

* Rascoe, Burton, The Case of Leo Frank: A factual Review of One of the Most Sensational Murder Cases in Court Annals, Girard, KS, Haldemann-Julius, 1947

* Samuels, Charles, Night Fell on Georgia, New York, Dell Publishing Co., 1965

* Memet David, The Old Religion.

* Egelman, Sarah Rachel. Review of David Mamet, The Old Religion

* Bernstein, Matthew (2009). Screening a Lynching: The Leo Frank Case on Film and Television. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

* Hertzberg, Steven (1978). Strangers Within the Gate City: The Jews of Atlanta, 1845-1915. Philadelphia: the Jewish Publication Society of America.

* Melnick, Jeffrey Paul (2000). Black-Jewish Relations on Trial: Leo Frank and Jim Conley in the New South. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

* Golden, Harry (1966). The Lynching of Leo Frank. London: Cassell & Co.

* An Unspeakable Crime: The Prosecution and Persecution of Leo Frank By Jewish Supremacist Elaine Marie Alphin

[edit] Historical Archives

* American Jewish Archive, Cincinnati, Ohio. Leo M. Frank Collection 1913-1965

* Brandeis University, Waltham (near Boston), Massachusetts. Leo Frank Trial Collection 1909-1961

* Emory University, Atlanta Georgia. Leo Frank Collection, 1915–1986

* Leo M. Frank Research Library The best source for information on the Leo M. Frank Case, including images, articles, books and videos.

* New South and Leo Frank, digital archive of original images and documents about the Leo M. Frank Case c. 1905 to 1986.

* New York Public Library. Digital gallery of original Leo M. Frank Case photographs. Leo M. Frank Case defense theory on the stages of the murder of Mary Phagan commissioned by New York Times owner Adolph Ochs.

* William Breman Jewish Heritage & Holocaust Museum of The Atlanta Jewish Federation. Leo M. Frank Collection 1878 to 1983. Including rare images.

[edit] Video

A few seconds of Alonzo Mann 1982 / 1983.

* People v Leo Frank, review of the documentary, People v Leo Frank (2009), a film about Leo Frank by Ben Loeterman.

* Fiddlin’ John Carson-Little Mary Phagan Youtube.com picture of Fiddlin’ John Carson, with song remake by MoonShine Kate.

* Moonshine Kate Ballade of Mary Phagan Youtube video with interchanging images as the song plays.

[edit] Videos taking the Jewish Community & Defense Positions

* They Won’t Forget A pretty schoolgirl is murdered. An ambitious prosecutor wants publicity. And an outsider – a Northern teacher in a sleepy Southern town – makes a handy defendant, someone the locals will happily convict, innocent or guilty. Based on the infamous Leo Frank case, They Won’t Forget is an explosive, acclaimed indictment of bigotry that’s rich in deceptive motives, sudden violence and courtroom suspense. The talent is as powerful as the story: Mervyn LeRoy (I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang) produced and directed with steady hand and crackling pacing, Robert Rossen (The Hustler) co-wrote the unflinching script, Claude Rains (Casablanca) etches a portrait of the ruthless prosecutor with poison and guile, and in her first credited role, Lana Turner makes the schoolgirl beguiling prey for an unhinged mind.

* The Murder of Mary Phagan (1987), IMDb.com, accessed August 23, 2010. The film stars Jack Lemmon, Peter Gallagher, and Kevin Spacey, and won an Emmy in 1988.

* The People versus Leo Frank” (2009), IMDb.com review, accessed August 23, 2010.

* The 1964 television series “Profiles in Courage” dramatized Governor John M. Slaton’s decision to commute Frank’s sentence, The episode starred Walter Matthau as Governor Slaton and Michael Constantine as Tom Watson.

[edit] Music

Music Biased Against Leo M. Frank

* During the trial an Atlanta musician and millworker, Fiddlin’ John Carson, wrote and began performing a murder ballad, “Little Mary Phagan.” During the mill strikes of 1914 Carson sang “Little Mary Phagan” to crowds from the Fulton County courthouse steps. An unrecorded Carson song, “Dear Old Oak in Georgia,” sentimentalizes the tree from which Leo Frank was hanged.

* The Little Mary Phagan Song. Right mouse-click and save as.

Music taking the Jewish Community & Defense Positions

* Jamie Saft wrote a song, The Ballad of Leo Frank. The story of Frank’s trial and eventual lynching is included in the liner notes of Saft’s album entitled Black Shabbis.

[edit] Media News

* Leo Frank RSS updated news source for Leo Frank articles in mainstream media.

[edit] Fiction

* Golden, Harry. A Little Girl is Dead 363 pages, OH: World Publishing Company, published in 1965. Available for download from the Internet archive in Adobe PDF format.

* Greene Ward, Death in the Deep South A fictional account of a rape of a young girl committed by a factory owner and his resultant lynching at the hands of a lynch mob. The storyline closely parallels that of the infamous Leo Frank case which the story is based and inspired the book.

[edit] Newspaper Articles

mostly neutral

* New York Times on the Lynching of Leo M. Frank August 19th 1915 from an impartial correspondent. Despite the Jewish Supremacist views espoused by the New York Times, this article was mostly fair, neutral and balanced.

biased in favor of Leo M. Frank

* Mystery of the Pencil Factory by Sidney Sutherland from Ten real murder mysteries–never solved! New York : London G.P. Putnam’s Sons. Published in 1929 by the Knickerbocker Press.

* “Indicted for Girl’s Murder”, The New York Times, May 25, 1913.

* “Begin Last Frank Appeal to Governor.” The New York Times, June 13, 1915.

* “Slaton Here; Glad He Saved Frank.”, The New York Times, June 30th 1915.

* “Leo Frank’s Throat Cut by Convict”, The New York Times, July 17, 1915.

* “Frank Survives Assassin’s Knife”, The New York Times, July 19, 1915.

* “Frank’s Assailant Before Governor”, The New York Times, July 25, 1915.

* “Frank’s Head in Braces; Excessive Heat Delaying Recovery from Wound in Throat”, The New York Times, August 2, 1915.

* Newt Morris, who “had experience in mob-quelling,” appeared at the hanging tree, and was commended for controlling the second mob; see “Grim Tragedy in Woods.”, New York Times, August 19, 1915.

* “Grim Tragedy in Woods”, The New York Times, August 18, 1915.

[edit] Interesting Links

* Honest Media Today. An archive of Leo M. Frank Case documents and images.

* The Leo Frank Trial. An archive of Leo Frank trial documents from JR Online Books.

* Without Sanctuary Photos of criminals Lynched in the United States. The web site takes the side of the criminals.

* Murder Southern Style Maps, images and locations of Mary Phagan, Leo Frank, Lucille Selig and others.

Holocaust Revisionist Sides With Jewish Supremacists

* C.W.Porter’s comments Holocaust Revisionist C.W. Porter takes the side of the Jewish Community & Defense side in regards to the Leo M. Frank Case.

[edit] Tom Watson

* Agrarian Rebel: Tom Watson, the 1938 biography of firebrand politician and seasoned lawyer Tom Watson written by C. Vann Woodward. Watson covered the Leo Frank trial in his Watson’s Magazine 1915 Jan., March, August, September and October. Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank Case was written in September 1915.

[edit] ADL Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith

* The Truth About the ADL Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. Archive of news articles about one of the most dangerous spy and espionage organizations in the United States, the ADL of B’nai B’rith.

* Honest Media Today. Archive of the criminal activities of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith.

* JR Online Books ADL of B’nai B’rith Information Archive. Excellent collection of news, essays, texts and images about the nations Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

* The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a perfidious & subversive Jewish treason and espionage spy agency masquerading as a civil rights organization. The league was founded in Oct. 1913 after one of its B’nai B’rith presidents, the pedophile rapist and murderer Leo Frank was convicted for the murder of a Christian girl named Mary Phagan.

* For one perspective on the founding of the ADL, see Blakeslee, Spencer. The Death of American Antisemitism. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000, 81.

[edit] Discussion Forums

* Leo Frank Case: Trial and Aftermath. This is a friendly place to discuss the famous case of Leo Frank and Mary Anne Phagan (1913-1915). Although most modern publications have rendered their verdict, there is still some room for reconsideration. Let us know your thoughts.

[edit] Lynching Site

* Leo Frank was lynched approximately at this location: 33°57’2″N 84°31’1″W. An aerial map of the lynching location at what formerly called Frey’s Mill or Frey’s Grove.

* Mary Phagan Burial Site. Wrongly labeled as Leo M. Frank Hanging site, this is cemetery where Mary Phagan was buried.

[edit] Georgia State & Government Web Sites

* Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. Created by Constitutional Law in 1943. In 1986 in an act of betrayal to the people of Georgia, they caved in to Jewish pressure from the ADL and other Jewish groups granting a pardon (forgave him) to Leo M. Frank, but refused to exonerate (reverse the conviction for murder).

* Leo M. Frank Clemency Documents. Material concerning the trial and appeals of Leo Frank. Included are his application file for executive clemency to commute his sentence from death to life imprisonment, plus evidence from the collection of Governor John M. Slaton. The clemency application file includes supporting documentation and the decision and executive order of Governor John M. Slaton in response to the application.

* 08 LC 14 9838. Senate Resolution 1066.By: Senators Hill of the 32nd, Thompson of the 33rd, Rogers of the 21st, Stoner of the 6th and Wiles of the 37th Jewish Supremacist manipulation working in Georgia.

Fair Usage Law

December 5, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations  Comments Closed

JUDAISM’S STRANGE GODS

JUDAISM’S STRANGE GODS

http://www.archive.org/details/JudaismsStrangeGods

by Michael A. Hoffman II

with notes, glossary,

bibliography and index

In this scholarly and deeply considered work, the author documents his provocative thesis that Judaism is not the religion of the Old Testament, but the newly formalized belief system of the Pharisees, which arose in Babylon with the commitment of the formerly oral “tradition of the elders” to writing, in the wake of the crucifixion of Israel’s Messiah and the destruction of the Temple.

Basing his findings on authoritative Judaic sources, Hoffman demonstrates that Judaism is a man-made religion of tradition and superstition, which represents the institutionalized nullification of Biblical law and doctrine.

Liberating the reader from the accumulated shackles of decades of misinformation, this book shows that Judaism’s God is not the God of Israel, but the strange gods of Talmud and Kabbalah, and the racial self-worship they inculcate.

Making a relentless case with massive documentation and a lapidary attention to detail, Judaism’s Strange Gods constitutes a shocking and original revelation about a subject we thought we knew only too well.

Michael A. Hoffman II was educated at the State University of New York at Oswego. He is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of several books, including Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare and The Great Holocaust Trial.

http://www.archive.org/details/JudaismsStrangeGods

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Truth about Leo Frank and Mary Phagan

Leo Frank was a criminal who murdered a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan in 1913. Because he was the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith (essentially, Brotherhood of the Chosen), many Jews from across the US worked in a concerted movement to free him for the crime, with one Jewish donor alone donating $100,000 towards Frank’s defense (equivalent to over $2 million today).

Many Jews argued that racist Gentiles in the deep South were simply persecuting Frank because he was Jewish, and wanted to let the real criminal, a Black man, go free – because everyone knows how much Whites in the deep South prefer Black rapist child-murderers to White Jews (written with obvious sarcasm) – or so some Jews with their deficient arguments claimed.

While unsuccessful in their attempts to secure a new trial, with appeals up to the Supreme Court being denied based on the evidence, B’nai B’rith was successful with getting the governor (who had been a law partner with Frank’s defense team) to change the murderer Frank’s sentence from death to life imprisonment.

The public was outraged because of the child-murderer Frank being freed. Frank had reportedly raped Mary Phagan, according to some accounts. However, it may not have simply been a sex-crime. Indeed, it may have been a much more depraved act than has been admitted, as noted in the Brief of Evidence (part 1 – linked – see p. 11). Read Newt Lee’s testimony at the Frank trial, describing Mary Phagan’s body when initially found:

“Her face was punctured, full of holes and was swollen and black. She had a cut on the left-side of her head, as if she had been struck, and there was a little blood there. The cord was around her neck, sunk into her flesh.”

Punctured? Full of holes? She had been tied with cords? Other testimony, however, while showing that she was indeed strangled to death, suggests that the head wounds may have been caused by a blunt instrument. Whatever the case may have been, it was a hideous crime nevertheless–one for which Frank undoubtedly deserved the death sentence.

Governor John Slaton was not re-elected because of his decision to commute Frank’s sentence. The prosecuting attorney in the Frank case, Hugh Dorsey, ended up being elected to governor for his ethical and civil behavior in getting Frank his just death sentence. Thomas Watson, who undauntedly informed the public about the true nature of the Frank case, was elected to the Senate. And, some Southerners who were concerned about justice being lost decided to give Frank the death sentence he rightly deserved–to hang Frank themselves.

Later, in 1986, after years of trying to get the sentence changed, due to the efforts of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (with the ADL having been formed due to the Frank case, as many aristocratic Jews sought to help Frank due to him being the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith), Frank was pardoned by the prison parole board. The parole board pardoned him not because he was innocent but because that the board felt that citizens, working as vigilantes to ensure justice was met, somehow deprived Frank of his rights.

Read about the case of Leo Frank – born in blood – that caused B’nai B’rith so much distress that they effectively covered it up today:

http://www.honestmediatoday.com/leo_frank.htm

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith Responds to Filthy Jewish Terrorists

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

B’nai Brith Canada calls on Attorney-General to immediately lay hate crime charges against genocide-advocating York student

TORONTO, 2010 – B’nai Brith Canada has called on Ontario Attorney-General Chris Bentley to move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Salman Hossain, a Bangladeshi-Canadian York University student who has allegedly called for a “genocide [to] be perpetrated against the Jewish populations of North America and Europe” on a website apparently owned by him. Yesterday, York University suspended Hossain pending his appearance at a disciplinary panel. Three years ago, Hossain made news for posting messages supporting terrorist attacks in Canada. At that time, the OPP investigated the matter but the Attorney-General decided against pressing charges.

“The hateful writing is on the wall and the Attorney-General must move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Hossain,” said Frank Dimant, Executive Vice President of B’nai Brith Canada. “Just recently, every political party in the Ontario Legislature came together and showed their commitment to fighting hatred in Ontario. While we appreciate their condemnation of the hate-fest know as ‘Israel Apartheid Week,’ it is now crucial that that commitment is followed up with concrete action.

“The website, which despite the announced investigation continues to be accessible, outrageously calls for the genocide of the Jewish people in North America and Europe, in addition to smearing Christians and moderate Muslims, and supporting terrorist attacks against Canadians. Hossain’s alleged posts clearly dictate that the Attorney-General should waste no time in moving forward with charges against him.”

B’nai Brith Canada has been active in Canada since 1875 as the Jewish community’s foremost human rights agency

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/

Fair Usage Law

November 25, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Racism News, Racist News, Tel Aviv, West Bank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

by Paul Goldstein

Rev A – See Notes

(from http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf – 12 MB pdf image-file)

Since the time of Philo of Alexandria, as before him, the religion of the antiprogress, landed oligarchy has been and is Isis worship. Through the intervening centuries, the high priesthood of the Isis cult has consciously directed one of its prime strategic efforts toward molding a small fraction of Jews, the “selected ones,” into an evil pseudo-religious cult. Drawing on the cult rituals of the mystical “Covenant” promise of return to the “Land of Zion,” and the irrational Cabala tradition of Judaism, the oligarchy’s priesthood formed from among its own secret society, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, a “Jewish” Masonic order. That order is the B’nai B’rith; its purpose to serve as defenders of the faith of the oligarchy against the threat of Neoplatonic humanism.

With the 1603 coup that “restored” the Stuart dynasty to the English throne, the seat of the oligarchy moved to Britain, where it remains to the present day. Beginning in the 18th century, the primary strategic threat to the oligarchy was the emergence of an institutionalized expression of Neoplatonic humanism in the form of the American republic’s stated founding commitment to generalized scientific and technological progress. Against that republic the British-centered oligarchy has thrown its entire arsenal of subversion, to and including the assassinations of at least three American Presidents.

The B’nai B’rith, as the oligarchy’s agents-in-place in America, has functioned as the clearinghouse for British subversion against the American republic. Therefore, the story of the B’nai B’rith, its Isis-cult roots, its 136-year record of treason against the United States, is essential to understanding who and what our enemy is, how it operates, and how we will destroy it.

BRITAIN’S “JEWISH IDEA”

The official history of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the parent cult to the “Jewish” Masonic order of B’nai B’rith, testifies to the built-in, viciously antireligious bias of the Rite’s cultist outlook, and the so-called Jewish influence in its historical development.

Masonry derives much of its ceremonial practices from the Collegia of Rome and their prototype, the Ernoi of Greece. In these societies the pattern of imitation was the Sun God under the name of Dionysus…, whose death and resurrection formed the main theme. In Masonry their place has been taken by Hiram as the type of Sun, whose name is derived from light. These are traces of Jewish influences on the Craft. Perhaps the reason for this may lie in the fact that when the Baccaric were suppressed in Rome Caesar permitted the Jews “and only these” to continue their rites. The placing of the Jewish Scriptures on the Altars of Masonry as the Volume of the Sacred Law may be due to the tenacity with which the Semitic Race clung to the conception of the Unity of the Deity. “Hear, O Israel — Tetragammation — Our God Tetragammation — Unity” was the rally cry of the “Chosen People.”

The cult outlook becomes even clearer by examining and comparing a relatively buried account recorded by a member of the order at the time of the B’nai B’rith’s founding. The official journal The Menorah stated:

Their reunions were frequent and several of them being members of existing benevolent societies, especially of the order of Free Masons and Odd Fellows, they finally concluded that a somewhat similar organization, but based upon the “Jewish idea” would best obtain their object.

The Jewish religion has many observances and customs corresponding to the secret societies known to us. The synagogue, for instance, might be compared to a lodge room. It used to be open twice a day; for a Jew desiring to find a friend, he had but to go there and make themselves known by a certain sign and token The sign consisted of a grip with a full hand and the magical word Sholem Alachem. The messussah on the doorpost was the countersign, Shema Israel (Hear, O Israel — ed.) was the password. (emphasis added.)

Known as the “Order of the Sons of the Covenant,” the B’nai B’rith came into existence under the personal direction of the Earl of Shaftesbury, Lord Palmerston, who was the Grand Patriarch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and their “Hofjuden” (Court Jew) accomplices, Sir Moses Montefiore and the family of the Rothschilds. In a July 1841 memorandum to Foreign Minister Palmerston, written in part as a motivation for the then recent founding of the “Colonization of Palestine Society,” Shaftesbury described the usefulness of the Jews for British strategic intentions, an idea elaborated as follows in his biography, The Life and Work of the Earl of Shaftesbury;

They (the Jews —ed . ) have ancient reminiscences and deep affection for the land …; they are almost everywhere, accustomed to arbitrary rule and being totally indifferent to political objects, confine their hopes to the enjoyment of what people to habits of endurance and self-denial (are accustomed ) they will submit to the existing form of government having no preconceived theories to gratify, and having almost everywhere trained in implicit obedience to autocratic rule ”

Financing for the British colonization scheme was arranged by Queen Victoria’s “favorite Jew” Sir Moses Montefiore, who, along with his brother-in-law Nathaniel Rothschild, used their financial conduits in the United States as a major feature of the plan. The Montefiore Society, the North American Relief Society for Poor Jews in Palestine, the Widows’ and Orphan Fund, plus dozens of other benevolent societies, provided the funds to establish a “Jewish homeland.”

From its inception in 1843, the American side of this operation, the B’nai B’rith, functioned not only as a secret Masonic cult to undermine the humanist Judaic tradition of Philo of Alexandria but, moreover, to use American Jews as part of Britain’s strategic design to destroy the American republic. The special role assigned to the leadership of the “Jewish” Masonic cult was to facilitate the deployment of numerous secret societies and cults the British had implanted in the U.S. during the last decade of the 18th century and the first half of the 19th century.

Working with the Anglican-American heresy tendency among the Jesuits and B’nai B’rith under the direction of the British Secret Intelligence Service, the “mother cult” Scottish Rite created numerous secret societies and cults modeled to varying degrees on the cult of Dionysus. The Transcendentalists, the Know-Nothings, the abolitionists, the secessionists of the Knights of the Golden Circle, and more, including the post-Civil War Ku Klux Klan, were synthetically created to participate in subverting U.S. institutions and leaders. Among the crimes committed by these networks were the assassinations of three U.S. Presidents; the sabotage of the American System economic program; and the undermining of the population’s belief in Reason and its product, Progress, as the guiding force of the U.S.’s and global development.

One humanist Jewish visitor to the U.S., Israel Joseph Benjamin, writing in his book Three Years in America, 1859-62 , commented on the B’nai B’rith: “This is a secret society, like the Freemasons with passwords and the like and was quite a new phenomenon for me … still I think the existence of such a society not at all necessary. Benjamin’s remarks, in contrast to standard portrayals of the B’nai B’rith as a “benevolent society” dedicated to defending and propagating “Jewish heritage” in the United States, are not only accurate, but place those authorities of the “benevolent viewpoint” in the category of the morally insane.

MOTHER CULTS AND CULTISTS

Under the Black Guelphs’ Knights of St. John Of Jerusalem, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry emerged as the aristocracy’s major political secret intelligence operation against humanist forces throughout Europe and the Mediterranean over several centuries. Officially, the Scottish Rite did not surface as the “mother cult” until the 18th century, but its roots are directly traceable to the destruction of the city-building Knights Templar in the 14th century, and to King Robert Bruce of Scotland, who declared himself “Grand Master of the Order of Heredom de Kilwinning,” the predecessor of the Scottish Rite.

The wave of repression begun by King Robert Bruce against the Knights Templar and their allies among the Philo-oriented Jews of Europe during the 14th-17th centuries, offered an early occasion for “Zionist project” recruitment and profiling of “selected Jews.” The symbiotic relationship that developed between the Jewish “chosen ones” and the knights of St. John of Jerusalem stemmed from the unique services the Jewish merchant banking families offered the Knights of St. John, under the overall control of the Genoese-Roman black nobility families.

The “selected Jews” were assigned a twofold task in the designs of the black nobility. First, by papal edict they were permitted to participate in usurious mercantile “money-lending” practices among the larger masses of Jews — those, that is, who did not flee to Greece, Turkey, and the Eastern Mediterranean — who were being herded into ghettos and victimized in the pogroms. Second, the “selected Jews” were to employ Cabalistic mysticism as a form of “mass-brainwashing” control over ghettoized Jews, creating false messiahs and holding out promises of salvation in the Land of Zion.

One Jewish writer recounts the story of one such false prophet produced during the period of the pogroms named Abraham Abulafia. “Abulafia, was a Cabalist,… to him the Bible was one huge cipher. He was able to rise to heights of ecstasy by concentrating on the letters of the Scripture, not on words or sentences, but on individual letters, combined and recombined in an infinite number of forms.”

One of the biggest frauds perpetrated during the 13th century, and which had a lasting impact on Jews into the 18th century, was the publication of Zohar, the Book of Splendor. In keeping with the priesthood tradition of the Pharisees, the “selected Jews” used Zohar as the outstanding “Talmudic”-type text for interpreting Moses’ law and for creating a distorted version of the Mosaic “Covenant.” Commenting on the Zohar, Jewish scholar Bernard Bamberger states, “The Zohar was put before the public by Moses de Leon, a well-known cabalist; (it) was composed in moments of exaltation and high emotional stress and its author no doubt believed himself to be writing under direct divine guidance.”

Mere publication of such texts or the emergence of mystic leaders in the hideous ghettos was not enough for the black nobility, however. Several “return to the Land of Zion” projects financed by the King of Portugal and his “selected Jewish financiers” were carried out over a period of time. In 1524, for example, David Reubeni and Solomon Molcho, self-proclaimed emissaries of the “Ten Lost Tribes,” arrived in Venice and traveled through northern Italy calling for “Holy War” against the Turks so that the Jews could return to their homeland and so that the Messiah could reveal himself. Theirs was a short-lived project — Reubeni ended up in prison, while Molcho was burned at the stake.

Perhaps the most infamous of these “self-appointed” messiahs was Sabbatai Zevi, who had gathered a vast following among Turkish Jews in the 1640s. After several years of intensive study of the Cabala, Sabbatai proclaimed himself the Messiah and by 1648, with the Jewish population inundated in the belief that 1648 was the year of the advent of the Messiah, Sabbatai launched his campaign. One account described Sabbatai as a “devoted student of the Cabala, (who) began to indulge in practices that kindled the hope of his enthusiasts”; Sabbatai’s aim was to restore Palestine to “Jewish control.” An indication of the source of his messianic zeal is that Sabbatai’s father had been for years in contact with certain British merchants seeking to break open the Turkish Empire’s control over the Near East.

Our historical research to date reveals these 17th century messiah projects to be the direct result of work done at Oxford and Cambridge Universities, where Hebraic “scholarship” had been restored under the direction of the leading priests of the Black Guelph oligarchy in Britain, Sir Francis Bacon and Robert Cecil. The Fifth Earl of Shaftesbury, who, with others, enabled the Genoese-Dutch banking interests aligned with the Bruce dynasty to defeat humanism in England under Elizabeth I and laid the basis for destroying Cromwell’s Commonwealth, shaped the Oxford and Cambridge projects.

As Scottish Rite historian Henry Evans develops in his book, The History of the Scottish and York Rite of Freemasonry,” it (the Scottish Rite) has been allied with the Jacobite movement (cult of fundamentalism — ed.) in Scotland and England, and with the Cabalistic (Jews) and Rosicrucian societies in Europe….” Pointing unmistakably to the direct interconnection between the early Scottish Rite and the Cabalistic societies’ promotion of the “Jewish idea,” Evans states further that the key figure of the mid-17th century, after Bacon’s death, was Elias Ashmole.

Ashmole is, in fact, perhaps the most important figure in the development of the Scottish Rite and the “Jewish idea” project for Zionism — Ashmole, that is, and his band of Oxford cultists including William Lilly, Christopher Wren, Sir Edward Dugsdale, and Dr. Robert Plot. In an 1880s official Scottish Rite biography of Ashmole, Dudley Wright states: “Ashmole was made a mason in 1645 at Warrington, a society of Rosicrucians formed in London on the principles established in Germany about 1604, and partly perhaps in the plan of Literary Societies, allegorically described in (Sir Francis) Bacon’s New Atlantis as the House of Solomon; …”

Ashmole and his Scottish Rite cultists reorganized Oxford University for the purpose of resurrecting the ancient cult of Hermes occult practices of the Egyptian priesthood, fully integrating ancient Hebraic scriptures and the Cabala into these rituals. By directing the research projects, by setting up the Scottish Rite Organization, and by founding the Ashmole Museum, Elias Ashmole institutionalized the beginnings of the modern “Zionist project.”

In commenting on these activities, Sir John Alexander Cockburn and Oxford biographer C.H. Joster have shown clearly the relationship between the Scottish Rite practices and the Cabala. Cockburn writes: “Christopher Wren maintained that the Scottish Rite derived its origin from the symbolic minds of the Eastern Races and was imported into Europe by the Crusaders, who thinking to subdue the Saracens, were themselves made captive by the enchantment of the Eastern mysticism and the Jewish Cabala’ (emphasis added). Joster added: “In Feb. 1652, Ashmole added yet another subject to his learned pursuits. The practice of engraving magic sigils with Cabalistic signs and related studies he had brought to his notice on Judaic sources which made Hebrew most desirable” (emphasis added).

The purpose of ritualized mystical cult practices became clear when, in 1763, the first official Hofjuden institution, the Board of Jewish Deputies, was created by the British oligarchy to oversee the “Jewish idea” project. The board was composed of Cabalistic rabbis and Hofjuden financiers, including the Montefiores, the Sebags and, later, the Rothschilds. The board was the brainchild of the “Hebraic studies” project of Ashmole and Rabbi Solomon Frank, who converted to Anglicanism after the 1603 Stuart Restoration but continued to work with Ashmole. Ashmole, for example, recorded in his diary lessons in Hebrew scriptures given by Rabbi Frank.

Sir Robert Gould reports in his five-volume work on the Library of Freemasonry that the Hebrew words “Akiman Rezon” or “akim” (brothers), “manah” (to appoint), and “ratzon” (to select) were chanted as part of the daily ritual of the Hofjuden deputies as they went about their tasks.

Many of the first rabbis to come to America had been trained by the Ashmolean-Oxford school and the Anglican Church-created British and Foreign School Society, which was founded in 1807 as a direct continuation of the earlier Ashmole project.

EARLY NETWORKS OF THE “SELECTED JEWS”

Prior to the emergence of a “Jewish” Masonic cult, the high priesthood of the oligarchy relied upon the already established network of Jewish merchant families that were part of the old Dutch West Indies gold and slave trade. Practically all of these so-called Sephardic Jews had been in the United States since the late 18th century and some even from the 17th century. Most were the initiating members of the U.S. wing of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

Based in New York City, Charleston, South Carolina and other southern cities including Baltimore, these “selected Jewish” merchants operated as part of Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service networks. Among them were Moses Cohen, Moses Levi, Isaac Da Costa, and Moses Peixotto, who organized the initial web of associations called the Hebrew Benevolent and Hebrew Orphan Aid Societies — the earliest of which was founded by Mendes Lopez in Charlestown in 1784. Numerous Hebrew Literary Societies were set up alongside these benevolent organizations.

It is important simply to note here, for development further on, that Judah P. Benjamin, later Secretary of War and Secretary of State of the Confederacy — and the man who more than likely gave the order for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln — was recruited into the Charleston Hebrew Orphan Aid Society in 1827.

At the outset the benevolent associations were either simple extensions of the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem Hospitallers (hospitals and hospices) or of the “Literary Societies” of Sir Walter Scott and Sir Isaac Disraeli. Disraeli’s History of the Jews in England provided the ideological bond and historical justification for the Hofjuden’s servile relationship to the oligarchy, while Sir Walter Scott’s feudalist extravaganza novel, Ivanhoe, glorified that theme — colored, of course, with Scott’s typical anti-Semitic emphasis. Scott’s heroine is a Jew named Rebecca, namesake of Rebecca Gratz, the daughter of a Philadelphia Jewish merchant Scott knew well.

The point to be understood about these early developments in the U.S. is twofold. First, the British had to create the conditions for imposing upon American Jews the belief that the American notion of progress and assimilation could not be allowed to occur. Therefore the need for a “separate” Jewish organization based on the mythos of Zion, on the return to the “promised land of Palestine,” had to be infused into American Jewish thinking as the only chance Jews had for true salvation. The earlier Hofjuden were not doctrinally equipped to serve British design in this fashion. Second, and particularly important for today, was the need to replicate the same servile dependency outlook among American Jews that the Montefiores, Sebags, and the like had for their British lords. The Jewish benevolent societies created in the U.S. were to serve as indoctrination centers for inculcating this outlook among the Jewish immigrants newly arrived from Germany and Poland, Jews who had fled the ghettos and pogroms of Europe.

By 1801, in keeping with the need to train both a religious and political-financial leadership among Jews in the U.S., the “Grand Council of the Princes of Jerusalem of the Mother Supreme Council of the Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry” conferred an official charter upon the former Dutch West Indies Jewish merchants of Charleston, South Carolina — Da Costa, Cohen, Israel de Lieben, Dr. Isaac Held, Moses Levi, John Mitchell, and Frederick Dalacho — the men who had established a foothold in America for Britain’s “Jewish idea” through the Hebrew Benevolent and Orphan Aid Societies.

The task assigned these American Jews was not an easy one, however. Intense animosity between these “established Jews” and the new Jewish immigrants from Germany, Bavaria, and Poland prevented any coherent organization from coming into existence. Moreover, the immigrant Jews recognized in the American republic and the promise of assimilation the potential for far more advanced levels of technological, scientific and cultural achievement than anything even conceivable in the ghettos of Europe. Commitment to generalized scientific and technological progress ran very high in the Jewish immigrant community.

Therefore, a new program had to be developed to subvert that commitment and to bring leading American Jews into line with Britain’s schemes.

B’nai B’rith’s Organized Treason

“Glance at the attitude of England toward the United States. We see there are two well-defined parties, neither of them friendly to us as a nation; one the cotton interest siding with the South, and the other, the abolition coteries siding with the North, and so England, balancing herself adroitly between these two parties …. can give aid … to one section or to the other or both, to prevent conciliation, as best may service the political purpose of England, the Permanent Division of the United States.”

With these words, penned in 1860, the famous inventor Samuel Morse, an American counterintelligence officer, summarized his findings in connection with a vast British espionage network operating in the United States by the time of the Civil War. At the center of the network was B’nai B’rith.

As Morse says, the network included the Southern secessionists, and also the so-called Abolitionists. It also included American Heresy Jesuits, whose political descendants operate out of Georgetown University today. It included most of the leading figures in the Democratic Party, and a boatload of others. But the Zionist “Order of the Covenant,” popularly known as B’nai B’rith, squatted at the center.

At the time Morse wrote, the B’nai B’rith was a British intelligence cult dedicated to the destruction of the American Republic. It was an arm of British intelligence with that chartered purpose at the time of its founding in 1843, and remains so to this day.

The founder of B’nai B’rith, contrary to official histories, was Henry Lord Palmerston, then British Foreign Minister, who simultaneously created the entire international Zionist movement, in the period of 1843-1860. Zionism was only one of tens of cults created under Palmerston, some “Jewish” and some “Christian” in name, and spread across Europe and America as subversive arms of the British Empire. Each cult was modeled on the Ashmolean Scottish Rite of Freemasonry — of which Palmerston was Grand Master — itself modeled on Ptolemaic Egypt’s death cult of Isis. B’nai B’rith emerged in 1842 as the American extension of the “Jewish” Rite of Freemasonry in America.

According to the history of B’nai B’rith by Edward Grusd, “the mastermind” behind the early growth of this Jewish Masonic order was Baruch Rothschild, relative of the original Meyer Amshel Rothschild who founded the family banking dynasty in 18th century Germany. Rothschild was sent into the B’nai B’rith shortly after its founding to launch a ”membership drive” because, as he himself put it, “the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities.” In short, B’nai B’rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild’s building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic.

The impetus which got B’nai B’rith and other, interfacing British networks off the ground in the United States was provided by the “Oxford Movement,” a groundswell of evangelical religious reform fever organized in the 1820s by the Anglican Church itself, Kings College of London University, and Oxford University, home of British intelligence. The religion the “Oxford Movement” espoused under the leadership of John Newman, and E.G. Pusey, Regius professor of Hebrew at Oxford, was neither Christian nor Jewish, but a simple revitalization of the old Ashmolean cult of Isis-Osiris-Dionysus, whose spiritual leaders were actually Palmerston and the Scottish Masons.

The “Oxford Movement” was deployed as a cult-creating force internationally. Into the United States, in conjunction with Hapsburg-Holy Alliance forces on the continent, Newman and Pusey sent the “American Heresy” Jesuits, “Christians who are not Christians,” who still operate on behalf of the British monarchy out of Georgetown. The second phase of the Oxford deployment, slightly later, would be B’nai B’rith, “Jews who are not Jews.”

The Jesuits launched an organizing drive among Irish Catholic immigrants, welding this mass into a base of support for Andrew Jackson’s ascension to the Presidency. Jackson, controlled by British agent Martin van Buren, subsequently destroyed the backbone of American economic development with his destruction of the Bank of the United States. The Jesuits also set up a vast spy apparatus called the St. Leopold Foundation, based in Baltimore, Maryland, the city that would also be the “Cradle of American Zionism.” The principal product of the seminaries and schools operated by the St. Leopold Foundation was assassination and other dirty work. The inner circle of figures involved in the Lincoln assassination, including John Wilkes Booth, were in the main trained by these Jesuits.

Samuel Morse, who was part of the overall U.S. political intelligence service numbering Edgar Allen Poe, Winfield Scott, and Washington Irving among its active agents, exposed the Scottish-Hapsburg Rite deployment of Jesuits to America with his pamphlet, “Foreign Conspiracy Against Liberties of the United States.” At approximately the same time, “Oxford Movement” leader John Newman proposed to the Anglican Church that it create a Jesuitical order of its own, so impressed was he with the work of the order in America.

During the same period of Jesuit activity, the Scottish Rite circles in England sent agents to organize an “anti-Catholic” ferment in the United States, producing mass anti-Catholic riots under the banner of the “Order of Native Americans,” and the “Order of the Star-Spangled Banner.” These operations later fused under one umbrella, the ritualized political organization known as the “Know Nothings.” Under the American Party banner, this British-controlled agency ran presidential candidates which played a determining role in the outcome of the Pierce (1852) and Buchanan (1856) presidential elections. Both Pierce and Buchanan were pro-British.

The same period of pre-Civil War subversion saw British promotion and manipulation of both Abolitionists and Secessionists, in a manner exposed by Morse in his 1860 pamphlet, “The Present Attempt to Dissolve the American Union, a British Aristocratic Plot.” Morse told his readers of a conversation between the Earl of Shaftesbury, and a Dr. Cheevcr. who ran the Abolitionist-Secessionist scenario from England. Shaftesbury said ” I, in common with almost every English statesman, sincerely desire the rupture of the American Union. Morse, writing in mock reply, said, ‘True words, my lord, you have epitomized with great precision and conciseness the inner political workings of the British aristocratic mind for many long years.”

Each of the above cited operations by the British actively involved the networks of B’nai B’rith. Evidence of the interface that existed between Jesuit and Zionist is had in the authoritative report that it was Judah Benjamin, a secret controller of B’nai B’rith, who gave the directive for Lincoln’s assassination to networks of the St. Leopold Foundation. Similar connections existed between Zionists and Abolitionists. When Moses Wiesenfeld, business partner of Aaron Friedenwald, the prominent Baltimore Zionist traitor, was arrested and convicted of maintaining Confederate war materiel in his factory, he was defended by Johns Hopkins, the leading Quaker “abolitionist.”

WHO WERE THE TRAITORS?

The British-Scottish Rite intelligence agents who played the most prominent role in the subversion of the American Republic before, during, and after the Civil War were Judah P. Benjamin, Benjamin Peixotto, Albert Pike, and August Belmont. Peixotto, was a President of B’nai B’rith; Albert Pike, a Confederate General, was a Grand Master of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America. Their superiors were Lincoln-assassin Benjamin and August Belmont, Lord Rothschild’s personal agent in the United States.

August Belmont made his inauspicious arrival in the United States in 1832, a decade before B’nai B’rith’s founding. Of Jewish extraction, he later “converted” to Christianity by marriage into the Perry family, and was never officially a member of B’nai B’rith. The same story of “conversion” applies to Judah Benjamin. Belmont and Benjamin’s long and close association with the Zionist leadership, however, is a matter of public record, and might be compared to the relationship of Henry Kissinger and the Zionist Lobby today. Belmont, Rothschild’s official financial representative in New York, was a British puppet, like each leader of B’nai B’rith.

Belmont, whose activity as a British agent was most notoriously conducted through the leadership role he played in the Democratic Party, (double-crossing and bribing his way into the chairmanship 1856-76) depended on the B’nai B’rith leadership in almost every dirty operation he carried out. An exemplary instance was the Belmont project to create an ultra-revolutionary pseudo-Republican “youth cult” formation within the Democratic Party.

The “youth cult” project was a British design which went far beyond America. Its architect was British Colonial Secretary Edward Bulwer-Lytton, a builder of the British opium empire with Palmerston, a leading Knight of St. John of Jerusalem, and a man whose writings did most to promote the revival of Isis-worship internationally. In England, Lord Lytton’s disciple, Benjamin Disraeli, founded the feudalist-romantic Young Englander movement. Similar movements were created by British intelligence in virtually every European country — Young Italy, Young Turkey, Young Russia, and so forth — an international terrorist network at the disposal of the British Empire.

In 1845, at the direction of August Belmont, a pamphlet appeared in the United States called “The Position and Duties of Young America.” The pamphlet had been copied in outline from a tract by Young Germany British agent Arnold Ruge. The American author was a powerful man in B’nai B’rith, Edwin deLeon.

As early as 1515, the Portuguese marrano deLeons were active in the slave trade for New World plantations. They later settled in Charleston, which many marranos preferred because its “liberal” state constitution permitted them not merely to trade in black flesh, but to own slaves and plantations themselves. Every member of the deLeon family was a traitor during the Civil War. David deLeon took command of the Confederate Army medical corps. Edwin deLeon, author of Belmont’s “Young America” pamphlet and later Consul General to Egypt under the pro-slavery President Franklin Pierce, was sent to Europe by Judah Benjamin on behalf of Jefferson Davis’s Confederate Government to meet with Lord Palmerston to raise funds for the Confederacy. The deLeon family’s slave-trade partner, Seixas, published a poem in the South Carolina Gazette that fervently extolled the joys of slave trading.

Edwin deLeon, whose appointment as Confederate Commissioner in Europe came from B’nai B’rith controller Judah Benjamin, joined with George Sanders, a Belmont man and former employee of the Bank of England, to form the youth cult within the Democratic Party, appropriately called Young America. The movement had a threefold program, published in a journal, also called ‘Young America,” run by “Abolitionist” Ralph Waldo Emerson:

— Reciprocal Free Trade

— Special cooperation with European (British-run) republican movements

— Ally with Great Britain against Russia and Austria British formation of these “youth cults” in cooperation with Zionists internationally was merely a prelude to the formation of an international assassination bureau at the disposal of the high priests of the Scottish Rite. In 1853, Franklin Pierce appointed George Sanders to be U.S. Consul in Liverpool, England; August Belmont became Ambassador to Holland, Belmont’s James Buchanan became U.S. Ambassador to England, and Senator Pierre Soule, owned by Judah Benjamin, became U.S. Ambassador to Spain.

In June, 1853, the high priests themselves, Lord Palmerston, the Earl of Shaftesbury, and Lord Russell, brought Sanders, Belmont, Buchanan, and Soule together at a series of meetings in London with Mazzini, Garibaldi, and Orsini of Young Italy; Arnold Ruge of Young Germany, Alexander Herzen of Young Russia, and Kossuth of Young Hungary. Out of this meeting came the international assassination bureau of the Scottish Rite-Order of Zion, whose first target was Louis Napoleon of France. A later target was Abraham Lincoln, first in 1861 in Baltimore, B’nai B’rith stronghold, and then, the fatal 1865 “hit” in Washington.

Samuel Morse, in works cited, labelled the American Civil War a “British Aristocratic Plot.” The vehicle selected by Palmerston, Russell, Shaftesbury et al. for their long-planned rupture of the American Union was a secret society, the Knights of the Golden Circle. It was in the main composed of the leadership of the Scotch Rite Freemasons in America and the leaders and controllers of B’nai B’rith: Judah Benjamin, Benjamin Peixotto, August Belmont, Albert Pike, Jefferson Davis, George Sanders, and others.

The Knights of the Golden Circle emerged out of the Nullification Crisis of 1828-32, when South Carolina set a precedent for sectional strife by attempting to secede from the Union over the tariff issue — the state was controlled by deLeon-striped Zionist slave-traders who controlled B’nai B’rith. In the 1840s, the Knights of the Golden Circle arranged — through Knight General William Walker, with Albert Pike serving under him — the U.S. military expedition into Mexico (something not ordered by the President), and related attacks on Cuba and Central America whose open object was the seizure of new slave-territory, fanning tensions between North and South which “Abolitionists” made the most of.

Subsequently, as the crisis they were building reached a head with Lincoln’s election and the waves of secession by Southern states, the Knights of the Golden Circle attempted a coup d’etat against Lincoln’s government immediately upon his inauguration. Involved directly were Judah Benjamin, Grand Master Mason Robert Toombs, Scottish Rite Commander Albert Pike, and the leading Zionist banking houses in Baltimore and New York, led by the Seligmans. The Seligmans financed all of the B’nai B’rith’s New York front organizations for the assimilation and indoctrination of immigrant Jews (“The German- Hebrew Literary Society” and so forth). The coup would have involved seizure of the capital city’s railroads, the Treasury and other strategic points, an assassination of Lincoln en route to the Baltimore stronghold of B’nai B’rith and the Jesuits, and the installation of John Breckenridge, secretly a Knight. The object of the coup was to ensure that the Civil War, already inevitable, would be fought out in the North, ravaging American industry in the British interest. The coup had been well planned, and only General Beauregard’s premature firing on Fort Sumter gave Lincoln and General Winfield Scott the warning they needed to crush the coup.

Immediately, the B’nai B’rith leaders in the Knights assumed leading positions in the Confederacy, with notably Judah P. Benjamin becoming first Attorney General and then Secretary of War under Knight-President Jefferson Davis. Benjamin subsequently became Secretary of State, assuming control of the espionage service of the Confederate States. Coordinating with Benjamin’s office was a “Secret Cabinet” located in British Canada, which helped run the Copperhead draft resisters’ operation in the north, created by August Belmont, and employing the talents of George Sanders among others. Among the spies in the North directly controlled by Benjamin and the Canadian “Secret Cabinet” was John Wilkes Booth. Also at Judah Benjamin’s disposal throughout the Civil War was every branch of B’nai B’rith.

B’nai B’rith’s networks consisted of those synagogues and Jewish welfare organizations established by Zionist slave-traders in the first half of the century. Their deployment was open and loud from the first days of the Secession Crisis. During the peak of the crisis in 1861, “Covenant” Rabbi Morris Raphall of New York City gave a sermon on the “Bible View of Slavery,” justifying every hideous aspect of the previous 300 years’ Zionist fortune-making off black flesh. His sermon was widely praised in synagogues controlled by B’nai B’rith everywhere.

The Baltimore Hebrew Congregation, established in 1830, received its funding monies from the Dutch banking family of Judah Benjamin. Among its members were the treacherous Friedenwalds. Rabbi Bernard Illomay, in support of Raphall, addressed the congregation on Lincoln’s government: “Who can blame our brethren of the South for their being inclined to secede from a society under whose government their ends cannot be attained and whose union is kept together by heavy iron ties of violence and arbitrary force? Who can blame our brethren of the South for seceding from a society whose government cannot or will not protect the property rights (read: slaves) and privileges of a great portion of the union?” Slavery, said Illomay, is “divinely ordained.”

Baltimore, a strategically placed port city and transportation center, was a key to the B’nai B’rith-Knights of the Golden Circle’s attempted coup against Lincoln, and the Confederacy’s broader strategy throughout the Civil War. In this city, the Zionists of the “Covenant” and other British agencies planned chaos. In April, 1861, rioting broke out between Union soldiers attempting to reach Washington to crush the Golden Circle coup and mobs led by members of B’nai B’rith, Young Italy, and the Jesuits. Persons opposing the mob “were molested; some were beaten and killed” including one Union soldier, according to eyewitnesses. Printing presses, including those which printed the “Sinai” newsletter of Rabbi David Einhorn, an anti-Zionist Jew who denounced slavery, were destroyed. Homes were set afire; train tracks entering the city were destroyed. One of the individuals arrested was Joseph Friedenwald, sire of a leading Zionist family in Baltimore. Opposition to B’nai B’rith within the Jewish Community was crushed. Rabbi David Einhorn was run out of town and to this day, he is slandered by B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation League spokesman as “merely an abolitionist.”

Not only in Baltimore, but throughout the border state area and South, B’nai B’rith lodges were functioning as “safehouses” and centers for espionage operations directed by Judah Benjamin. It was this that prompted General Ulysses Grant, late in the war, to issue a directive that all Jews from Tennessee to Mississippi were to be arrested for espionage. Those B’nai B’rith officials and others subsequently put on trial for espionage were defended by lawyer Simon Wolf. Grant then ordered Simon Wolf himself arrested. Wolf’s release was secured by the traitor Edwin Stanton, Lincoln’s Secretary of War. Wolf went on to become the President of B’nai B’rith some years later.

B’NAI B’RITH’S KKK

Eight months after Lincoln’s assassination in 1865, Judah Benjamin and Albert Pike created the Invisible Empire of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan out of what remained salvageable from the Knights of the Golden Circle. Aiding them in this project, and a Klan leader, was a Charleston South Carolina Zionist named Baruch, Bernard Baruch’s grandfather. Judah Benjamin contributed some funds for the funding of the KKK, but the bulk of the financing was handled by the southern branches of B’nai B’rith. The various Klans in the United States are controlled by the Anti-Defamation League and related Zionist organizations to the present day.

Benjamin and George Sanders subsequently fled to the safety of England, with Pike remaining to run the Klan operation in the South. The operation was modelled on the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, with all the rituals attending thereto. Pike had been one of the intellectual guides of the order, and had written extensively on the subject of mysticism and the ancient cults, including books: “The Christian Mysteries,” “Gnosticism, the Kabala and the Mysteries of Masonry,” and “Zoroaster of Sarathrustra and His Doctrines.” Pike described his (and B’nai B’rith’s) worship of the goddess Isis, as follows:

“It began to shape my intellectual vision,” wrote Pike in reference to the Scottish Rite, “into something imposing and majestic … It seems to me like the pyramids in the grandeur and loneliness whose yet undiscovered chambers of generations of the sacred books of the Egyptians (are) … so long lost to the world; in its symbolisms which are its spirit of brotherhood and its essence, Freemasonry is more ancient than all of the world’s living religions.”

Another famous quote of Pike’s was, “Masonry says, ‘Be content, compare not your condition with the few above you … that he hath not the wealth of Rothschild’ …”

After the Civil War, Benjamin Peixotto, the former B’nai B’rith president, secured an appointment as U.S. consul to Romania, through the intervention of German-born Carl Schurz, a long-time British intelligence agent. As an advisor Peixotto took along Simon Wolfe, also a B’nai B’rith president. The appointment had been an aim of the Rothschilds and Montefiores in London. In Romania, Peixotto created the infamous Order of Zion, which worked to destroy the Russian-U.S. entente that had helped save Lincoln’s Union from British intervention during the Civil War.

Sidebar

The Platform of Zionism’s Humanist Enemy

In 1861 Rabbi David Einhorn was driven out of Baltimore for his attacks on the proslavery Zionists who (as today) ran the city. Reprinted here is the text of his “Pittsburgh Platform,” as adopted by the Central Conference of Reformed Rabbis in 1889. Ninety years later, it still embodies the ecumenical qualities of humanist Judaism.

IN ACCORD WITH REASON

First — We recognize in every religion an attempt to grasp the infinite, and in every mode, source, or book or revelation held sacred in any religious system, the consciousness of the indwelling of God in man. We hold that Judaism presents the highest conception of the God idea as taught in our Holy Scriptures and developed and spiritualized by the Jewish teachers, in accordance with the moral and philosophical progress of their respective ages. We maintain that Judaism preserved and defended, midst continual struggles and trials and under enforced isolation, this God idea as the central religious truth for the human race.

Second — We recognize in the Bible the record of the consecration of the Jewish people to its mission as priest of the one God, and value it as the most potent instrument of religious and moral instruction. We hold that modern discoveries of scientific researches in the domains of nature and history are not antagonistic to the doctrines of Judaism, the Bible reflecting the primitive ideas of its own age, and at times clothing its conception of divine providence and justice, dealing with man in miraculous narratives.

Third — We recognize in the Mosaic legislation a system of training the Jewish people for its mission during its national life in Palestine, and today we accept as binding only the moral laws, and maintain only such ceremonies as elevate and sanctify our lives, but reject all such as are not adapted to the views and habits of modern civilization.

Fourth — We hold that all such Mosaic and rabbinical laws as regulate diet, priestly purity, and dress, originated in ages and under the influence of ideas altogether foreign to our present mental and spiritual state. They fail to impress the modern Jew with a spirit of priestly holiness; their observance in our days is apt to rather obstruct than to further modern spiritual elevation.

Fifth — We recognize, in the modern era of universal culture of heart and intellect, the approaching of the realization of Israel’s great messianic hope for the establishment of the kingdom of truth, justice, and peace among all men. We consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community, and therefore expect neither a return to Palestine, nor a sacrificial worship under the sons of Aaron, nor the restoration of any laws concerning the Jewish state.

Sixth — We recognize in Judaism a progressive religion, ever striving to be in accord with the postulates of Reason. We are convinced of the utmost necessity of preserving the historical identity with our great past. Christianity and Islam being daughter religions of Judaism, we appreciate their providential mission to aid in the spreading of monotheistic and moral truth. We acknowledge that the spirit of broad humanity of our age is our ally in the fulfillment of our mission, and therefore we extend the hand of fellowship to all who operate with us in the establishment of the reign of truth and righteousness among men.

Seventh — We assert the doctrine of Judaism, that the soul of man is immortal, grounding this belief on the divine nature of the human spirit, which forever finds bliss in righteousness and misery in wickedness. We reject as ideas not rooted in Judaism the beliefs both in bodily resurrection and in Gehenna and Eden (Hell and Paradise) as abodes for everlasting punishment or reward.

Eighth — In full accordance with the spirit of the Mosaic legislation, which strives to regulate the relation between rich and poor, we deem it our duty to participate in the great task of modern times, to solve on the basis of justice and righteousness, the problems presented by the contrasts and evils of the present organization of society.

Notes

Rev A: Changed nonbreaking spaces to regular spaces to prevent premature line breaks

Fair Usage Law

November 23, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

If you want to know what really happened in the Leo Frank Case you can read the following books.

The best books on the subject –

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan, By Mary Phagan Kean
http://www.archive.org/details/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn1913

2. The Abridged Trial Testimony of the Leo Frank Murder Trial (1918)
http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankExtractFromAmericanStateTrialsVolumeX1918

3. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913
http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankCasemaryPhaganInsideStoryOfGeorgiasGreatestMurder

And The man the Jews blame for causing Leo Frank to be Lynched, five works by Tom Watson.

Five Books on the Leo Frank Case by Tom Watson (MUST READ)

1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See

page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankCase

2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See

page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson,

Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheFullReviewOfTheLeoFrankCaseMarch1915

3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915)

Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo

Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheCelebratedCaseOfLeoFrank

4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915)

Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew

Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheOfficialRecordInTheCaseOfLeoFrankJewPervertSeptember1915

5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom

Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company,

Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/RichJewsIndictTheStateOfGeorgia

Fair Usage Law

August 13, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

Montreal Gazette: Bill Surkis, B’nai B’rith and Child Porn

MONTREAL – The former director of B’nai Brith Canada in Quebec has been sentenced to serve 45 days in jail on weekends after pleading guilty to possession of child pornography.Bill Surkis, 71, held his hands behind his back as Quebec Court Judge Céline Lamontagne said he would begin serving his sentence this weekend, from 9 […]

Fair Usage Law

December 10, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith President Bill Surkis Received 45 Days in Jail for 21 Child Porn Videos

Ex-Jewish community leader jailed 45 days for child pornPublished On Thu Dec 09 2010MONTREAL—A former Quebec director of B’nai Brith has received the minimum 45-day jail term after earlier pleading guilty to a child pornography charge.Bill Surkis will serve the time on weekends, beginning this Saturday.A judge ruled in Montreal today that Surkis must also […]

Fair Usage Law

December 10, 2010   Posted in: Affirmative Action News, AIPAC, Anne Frank, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Gaza, Golan Heights, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Multicultural News, Palestine, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Leo Frank Case

The Leo Frank Case – open or closed?On April 27, 1913, shortly before the Atlanta Journal had printed all the events of the previous day, Leo Frank sketch in the Aug 1913 AC. a congratulatory article had already appeared in their pages: “Grand Opera Helped to Improve Atlanta’s Morals…the records at the police station will […]

Fair Usage Law

December 7, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations  Comments Closed

Leo Frank April 26 1913 to August 17 1915

Leo Max Frank, also stylized as Leo M. Frank or Leo Frank (April 17, 1884 – August 17, 1915)From Brooklyn, New York, to Atlanta, GeorgiaLeo M. Frank was a Jewish-American raised during his most formative years in Brooklyn, New York City. Frank later matriculated to Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, one of the State’s […]

Fair Usage Law

December 5, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations  Comments Closed

JUDAISM’S STRANGE GODS

JUDAISM’S STRANGE GODShttp://www.archive.org/details/JudaismsStrangeGodsby Michael A. Hoffman IIwith notes, glossary,bibliography and indexIn this scholarly and deeply considered work, the author documents his provocative thesis that Judaism is not the religion of the Old Testament, but the newly formalized belief system of the Pharisees, which arose in Babylon with the commitment of the formerly oral “tradition of […]

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Truth about Leo Frank and Mary Phagan

Leo Frank was a criminal who murdered a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan in 1913. Because he was the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith (essentially, Brotherhood of the Chosen), many Jews from across the US worked in a concerted movement to free him for the crime, with one Jewish donor alone donating $100,000 towards […]

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith Responds to Filthy Jewish Terrorists

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEB’nai Brith Canada calls on Attorney-General to immediately lay hate crime charges against genocide-advocating York studentTORONTO, 2010 – B’nai Brith Canada has called on Ontario Attorney-General Chris Bentley to move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Salman Hossain, a Bangladeshi-Canadian York University student who has allegedly called for a […]

Fair Usage Law

November 25, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Racism News, Racist News, Tel Aviv, West Bank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America by Paul Goldstein Rev A – See Notes(from http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf – 12 MB pdf image-file)Since the time of Philo of Alexandria, as before him, the religion of the antiprogress, landed oligarchy has been and is Isis worship. Through the intervening centuries, the high priesthood of the Isis cult has consciously […]

Fair Usage Law

November 23, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913If you want to know what really happened in the Leo Frank Case you can read the following books. The best books on the subject – 1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan, By Mary Phagan Keanhttp://www.archive.org/details/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn19132. The Abridged Trial Testimony […]

Fair Usage Law

August 13, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."