Archive for the ‘Anti-Semitism’ Category

CUI BONO? by Professor Revilo P. Oliver (May 1992)

Americans who do not read German readily will be glad to know that the fine historical study by Ingrid Weckert, *Feuerzeichen, die “Reichskristallnacht”* (Tbingen, 1981), which was reviewed in *Liberty Bell* by Dr. Charles E. Weber, January 1989, pp. 15-20, and mentioned in the issue for April-May 1991, pp. 95-96, 104-105, has been translated into English and published by the Institute for Historical Review (1822 1/2 Newport Boulevard, Costa Mesa, California; 92627; paperback, $17.55 postpaid.)

The learned author contents herself with presenting facts attested by the extant records concerning the incident that occurred in 1938. She does not draw conclusions from them, for that would have brought upon her and her publisher punishment from the Sheenies who own the government that American idiots impose on that hapless and long-suffering German people. (Why do you suppose that you are taxed to maintain an idle army, composed largely of niggers and females, in Germany?)

I have often remarked on the Jews’ contempt for the stupid Aryan swine, (1) and the consequent carelessness with which they perpetrate their hoaxes, including their great Holohoax. There are some good examples of such *nonchalance* in this book.

When the Kikes forged a letter from Heydrich to Goering, gleefully attesting the destruction of 815 Jewish business establishments and the burning of 18 large department stores–secure in the confidence that Aryan boobs would not wonder how it happened that there were so many flourishing Jewish businesses in a country in which God’s Race was so vilely persecuted–they forged the letter on a letterhead that had been obsolete for a year and a half, with a telephone number of a type that no longer existed, forged a signature in a form that Heydrich had never used and which Goering would have regarded as insolent, and got the address of Goering wrong! (Weckert, pp. 65-67.)

That was only typical of many clumsy Yiddish forgeries and faked evidence to support their yelping about the horrible night on which Germans broke the sacred glass windows of Jewish stores, including some of the large and prosperous department stores which, in Germany at that time, were almost all owned by Yahweh’s godly parasites.

The *Kristallnacht* fitted perfectly into the Zionists’ strenuous efforts to provoke the Germans into harming sacred Sheenies for the dual purpose of 1) inciting a migration of Jews to Palestine in preparation for the mass invasion of Arab territory and the foundation of the bandit state called Israel; and 2) creating a basis for propaganda in preparation for the attack on Germany that was to be launched by Roosevelt, Stalin, and their half-English stooge, Churchill.

The Zionists’ scheme was described and documented with photographic excerpts from their own writings by what is almost a prodigy in our time, an honest and honorable Jew, (2) the late J.G. Burg (Ginsburg) in his *Schuld oder Schicksal?* (Munich, 1962), of which, so far as I known, there is no English translation.

(2. Mr. Burg thought of himself as a Jew and obviously had a Jewish father. I do not know the race of his mother, and hence cannot tell you whether or not he was considered a *real* Jew according to that race’s definition. He testified on behalf of Ernst Zndel in the recent trial in Canada, where Zndel is being persecuted by the Jews’ Canadian varlets for expressing disbelief in Jewish hoaxes that are used to intimidate and swindle Aryans in Germany and throughout the world.)

In the present book you now have in English a detailed description of one of the World Conquerors’ numerous efforts to incite in Germany the “Holocaust” they had to invent after their victory over our race and civilization in 1945. And the fiction about the *Kristallnacht*, which they imposed on gullible Aryans by their ownership of politicians and the press, is itself a good and typical example of the forgeries and hoaxes by which the predatory race has flourished ever since it appeared in history, a misfortune to mankind.

Since the hullabaloo in the poison-press in the United States excited some indignation among American simpletons at the time, the *Kristallnacht*, by the way, points to two neat lessons:

1) If Americans did not suffer from their morbid itch to meddle in other people’s business while neglecting their own, they would have responded to the accounts in the press, however exaggerated, with indifference, aware that what happened was none of their business, and that Germany had a right to manage her own affairs in her own interest.

2) Everyone who had a modicum of common sense and was willing to exercise it must have seen at once that the doctrine of *cui bono?* was applicable, because the reported outbreaks had occurred simultaneously in many parts of Germany, and therefore could not have been spontaneous expressions of local indignation against the despoilers, such as account for most of the so-called ‘pogroms’ in Czarist Russia. The outbreaks must therefore have been ordered by either a government or a formidable conspiracy against that government.

Since the small amount of damage and prompt governmental action to restore order prevented a substantial increase in the number of Jews persuaded to emigrate, the German government obviously derived no conceivable advantage from the window-breaking; it would have been ludicrous to imagine a conspiracy of glaziers; the incidents, therefore, were advantageous *only* to the race that was trying to excite animosity against a nation which was trying to recover full possession of its own country. Thus the double dative rule should have rendered further inquiry unnecessary, and a little rational thought in 1938 should have cautioned Americans to disregard thereafter all similar performances by the Masters of Deception.

This article originally appeared in Liberty Bell magazine.

Fair Usage Law

May 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, White Racism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!

BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so far!!

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Link: Hell Storm documentary

Please go to IMDB, create an account and write a negative review of this film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4661358/

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

The International Jew by Henry Ford the Most Bigoted Book Ever Written Since Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf

Please contact the Internet Archive and ask them to censor this hate book, before bigots download this book and upload it everywhere on the Internet. Please contact The Internet Archive, before bigots download this book and turn it into an audiobook (written in 2015).

https://archive.org/details/TheInternationalJewTheWorldsForemostProblemhenryFord1920s_201510

Hate update 2017: Alex Linder turned this book into a radio program! Do you see what happens when we don’t get these books deleted off the Internet? Let’s hope they don’t start making videos about them!

http://vnnforum.com/forumdisplay.php?s=3dd660968260f84c2845ad3d9f845918&f=177

 

Fair Usage Law

January 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Un-American Subversive Theatre: Parade the Leo Frank Broadway Musical Becomes International Cult Sensation

If you asked any of your friends, acquaintances, or family members, whether or not
they’ve heard of the Jewish activist musical called ‘Parade’, chances are most people
would likely shake their heads and say something along the lines of, “No, I’ve never
heard of it before”. Yet amongst theatre fans around the world, ‘Parade’ is a cult
classic. In fact, ‘Parade’ has been a major thespian feature in nearly every Western
nation across the world, including even far off Australia and New Zealand. Moreover,
what’s most striking is even though this Musical is more than 15 years old, it continues
playing out in new theaters across the United States, Canada and Europe to much fanfare and
rave reviews by leftists, social justice warriors, Anti-Gentile Jews and other people who
embody the universal force of entropy and regression to the mean.

If you don’t feel like wasting $$ on a ticket to see the show, you can watch it for free
on most major video sharing web sites like YouTube, but before you do, read up about the real facts of
this case from the The Internet Archive.

The Leo Frank Case Refuse to Gather Dust: The Celebrated Double Strangulation.

‘Parade’ the Broadway Musical, first launched in December, 1998, by two anti-Gentile Jewish
supremacists Jason Robert Brown (why the long face?) and Alfred Uhry (Jabba the Hutt), &
it uses a raped Christian teenage girl, who was strangled to death and mutilated in 1913, as a
cheap plot device, to humanize, lionize and rehabilitate a sadistic sexual predator and convicted
child-killer — Leo Frank the Toilet Strangler — because of his ethno-religion: Judaism.

Newspapers, Magazines and Internet: Media Reports Summarize the Affair.

The repeated theme of advertisements and reviews about this musical makes the Jewish
racial subtext clear and contentious, centering around the premise that Leo Frank
was suspected, indicted, convicted and hanged, because of widespread anti-Semitism,
not the facts, evidence, exhibits or testimony presented presented at his trial.
Fortunately however in 2010 the primary sources about the criminal case were published
online revealing what really happened and exposing generations of Jewish perpetuated lies
about the affair in the mainstream media and academy.

In the Wider Social Context: Jewish-Gentile American Culture War Born in 1913

For more than 100 years, the Frank-Phagan affair has been a fanatical cause celebre for
the well organized Jewish community, who believe the case should be perpetually retold
in the mainstream media and popular culture as an anti-Gentile morality tale, to remind Jews
and Gentiles alike that “not too long ago”, hate filled anti-Semitic European-Americans and
African-Americans from the “Old South” destroyed an innocent and nice Jewish boy from
Brooklyn. Also blamed by the Jewish Supremacists as part of the false narrative are newspaper
frenzies, police corruption, political ambition and bigotry. It’s the same old blame “the other”
strategy endemic to Jewish culture, used as a smoke screen to hide what really happened and
put people on the defense.

Since 1913, more than a dozen books have been written about the murder of Mary
Phagan and Lynching of Leo Frank, including several Hollywood style movies, a made-for-TV
miniseries (1988), docudramas (2009) and treatments of the affair in every modern media format,
with the expressed purpose of shaming European-Americans for their once prevailing cultural
ethnic solidarity — and oddly enough — this message is being pushed aggressively by the
most ethnocentric people since the dawn of civilization, who have a history of instigating
racial strife between different ethnic groups and causing financial problems in the countries
they choose to occupy: Jews, the parasites kicked out of 100+ countries over the course of many
centuries.

Downtown Atlanta, Georgia, 1913: Southern State Holiday During the Jewish Sabbath

On Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, inside a dingy shuttered factory
at the heart of Atlanta’s industrial sector, an infatuated serial rapist-pedophile, viciously
assaulted one of his teenage employees. The victim had rejected her boss’s creepy sexual
advances for the last time and paid the price with her life after being sexually assaulted.

In 1913, there were no clearly defined and established mainstream words for: acts of
sexual harassment, sex offenders, sexual assault, sadistic predatory child molesters or
serial rapist-pedophiles, other than some of the commonly used contemporary terms such as:
libertine, lustful, lecherous, rake, satyr, pervert and lascivious.

Little Mary Anne Phagan: Earned her nickname “Little” because she was less than 5 ft tall.

13-year-old child laborer, Little Mary Phagan (Born June 1, 1899), had been temporarily laid
off because the brass sheet metal had fully depleted on Monday morning, April 21, 1913, and
a new shipment had been late in arriving. Without this essential production material, there could
be no brass bands created for attaching at the ends of pencils, and therefore Phagan couldn’t
use the knurling machine at her work station in the machine room (known colloquially by factory
employees as the metal-room) to insert rubber erasers into them.

A Throw Away Detail? Monteen “Iola” Stover

An important detail rarely mentioned in nearly every retelling of this case is that not only
Mary Phagan, but four other girls had been furloughed until the delivery of materials was
slated to replenish supplies the week following the Confederate Memorial Parade. One of
those girls was a critical witness at the grand jury hearings and Leo Frank trial, named
Monteen Stover, who is represented as the naughty Iola Stover in this theatrical play.

National Pencil Company: The Machine Department AKA “Metal Room” on the 2nd Floor

Mary’s job was a business critical dependency in the factory’s manufacturing operations,
because securing erasers into the base of pencils was the last production stage, before they
were placed as neat bunches in waxy tissue paper, packaged inside rectangular monogrammed
boxes, before being loaded and shipped off for distribution nationwide in large crates.

During an average week in 1913, the National Pencil Company (NPCo) was grossing
between $2500 and $5400, which was rather impressive for a company born only five
years prior. The NPCo factory’s official founding date was: April 8th, 1908
(Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, April 8, 1908, The Internet Archive).

Major shareholders in this industrial venture were: Jewish stationary magnate, Sigmund
Montag, treasurer of the NPCo, and Leo’s wealthy uncle Moses, a shrewd cotton-oil
speculator, who entrusted his young Cornell educated nephew to manage the factory’s
business critical operations and accounting. Leo Frank began formally working at the
National Pencil Company on Monday morning, August 10, 1908, after spending nine
months in Germany, doing a pencil manufacturing apprenticeship for Eberhard Faber.
On Monday, September 7th, 1908, Leo Frank was promoted to the rank of Superintendent
at the National Pencil Company.

Saturday, April 26, 1913, Noontime: Five Years After the NPCo was Founded

At the National Pencil Company headquarters, located on 37-41 South Forsyth Street,
where the newer Sam Nunn building stands today, Phagan entered the anteroom of Leo
Frank’s second floor window front office at just minutes after high-noon. Standing in the
door frame, Little Mary Phagan said, “Mr. Frank?” and Leo’s lion-heart began thumping
quickly as he recognized the voice and gazed up, especially because now he was all alone
with the attractive child laborer who was dressed gaily in lavender dress trimmed with white
lace, one whom he had a crush on for so long and she had blossomed far beyond her tender
age.

Many Violent Crimes of Passion are Over Jealousy: Beauty vs the Beast

Leo had fired the 6’4” tall and strikingly handsome payroll manager, James Milton Gantt,
about two weeks earlier, because of a $2 shortage in the petty cash payroll box, but it was
nothing more than a ruse. Leo knew Mary was very much into James, as she looked up
dreamily into his sky blue eyes, like he was her Knight in shining armor, and James looked
after Mary as well. Gantt had known the Phagan family very well for several years and kept
an eye out for Mary, since sweatshop factories that employed child laborers were notorious
for being places where sometimes young girls and boys were targets of predatory older men.

So the superintendent got the prince out of the way, so the jealous dragon could play!

An Infatuated Pedophile: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Mary was the one employee Frank was infatuated with, and couldn’t have because
of Gantt, she had spurned lecherous Leo’s obnoxious pesterings and subtle innuendos
since the Spring of 1912, humiliating his arrogant ego and making him ever more determined.
For an upstart like Leo Frank, who rose to the heights of leadership in Atlanta’s Jewish
community in such a relatively short amount of time — becoming Atlanta B’nai B’rith president —
he was a man who didn’t like taking no for an answer, so now he would finally get even!

Frank said “Hello Mary” in a nebbish voice with a Brooklyn-Yiddish accent. Phagan immediately
requested her pay envelope of $1.20 and inquired if the ordered metal supplies had arrived yet.
She was naturally concerned, because she came from a poor family with five siblings and
depended on the money. She curiously wanted to know if, whether or not, she should return
to work on Monday morning April 28, 1913. Leo Frank said inquisitively, “No, I don’t know” as
he pushed back his wooden chair screeching against the floorboards and stood up briskly.
While walking together into the machine room, located just down the hall, opposite from
Frank’s office, they made small talk about wondering if, Mr. Darley, had received the brass
shipment yet in a timely fashion, and stocked the closet next to the lady’s dressing room
where these supplies were normally stored, located just diagonal to the wall where the lathe
work station was situated in the metal room.

Although Leo Frank initially said “No, I don’t know”, in truth his requisition papers indicated
otherwise. Leo’s hand written business ledgers indicated the ordered shipment wasn’t to
be delivered until early in the following week. Saturday was Confederate Memorial Day, an
important Georgia State holiday, most of Atlanta was shut down and no deliveries would be
made because of the Parade. Outside the factory, the streets were filled with lively revelers,
walking to and fro. Most people were dressed in their “Sunday’s Best” and despite the somber
mood this holiday represented, there was excitement in the air under chilly overcast skies.

Most Jewish-American accounts of the Mary Phagan murder case
leave out the facts and details about what happened next…

After the 5’8” tall and 155lbs., Leo M. Frank, lured 4’11” tall and 107lbs., Mary A. Phagan,
into the metal room on the pretext of determining whether or not she would need to report
to work on Monday morning, April 28, 1913 at 6:30 o’clock a.m., however “upon realizing”
the metal hadn’t yet arrived, he used her temporary laid off status as a species of sexual
coercion, but something went very wrong, and took a violent turn.

Inside the metal room, Frank’s heart began to throb as he said to
Phagan — while his effeminate hand gently caressed her shoulder —
“Mary, If you still want to work here, I want you to be with me”. Phagan
became grotesquely horrified and said, “NO!” while she tried to swiftly
pass by Frank at his left side and run out of the metal room, but he checked
her like he was playing basketball for his class team at Cornell, as he
had done so many time before during all four years of college (1902 – 1906) —
blocking her escape attempt, and closing ranks, this time there was no
where to run, and there was no where to hide. She was cornered and there
would be no escape.

Flustered, Frank seized her with both hands, but Phagan jerked her torso,
yanking away and told him “I’m not that kind of girl, take your hands off me!”

At this point the incident had crossed the line and could no longer be played off as a
joke, as it had been in the past with so many other female child laborers (19 girls would
later come forward to provide affidavits and testify to his lascivious character).
Jewish pseudo-scholars for nearly a century would claim these girls repudiated their
affidavits, until they were proven false when Atlanta archivists in 2010 released the
Georgia Supreme Court Records showing otherwise.

It was then at that exact moment, when she spurned the ultimatum of her lecherous and
bug-eyed superintendent for the last time, denying the desires of an effete cockalorum,
who had earned himself a bad reputation as a libertine, amongst the child laborers at
the factory.

Terror Unfolded!

In an explosion of rage, like a bucket of bricks falling out of the sky, Leo Frank clenched his
left fist as his gold wedding band tinkled in the dim gray light falling from the grimy factory
windows, and then he pivoted, growling like a lion, swiveling, pitching a fist curve ball into
Mary Phagan’s right temple as she reeled back screaming in absolute horror. In a precipitous
storm of fury, his angry knuckles began hailing down in a flurry against her delicate feminine
cheek bones like sledge hammers on the chain gang.

Jim Conley who was idly seated on an old wooden crate next to the
staircase at the factory’s first floor lobby, while the assault was
occurring upstairs in the metal room, eerily described to Police, weeks
later, the sound of Phagan’s bone chilling echoing cry of mortified
agony: As a stuttering laugh that broke off into a shriek and then
absolute silence.

Leo Frank kept pounding Mary Phagan’s face in, blow after blow, while
the back of her head slammed against the the lathe workstation
belonging to machinist Robert P Barret, leaving behind bloody tresses of
her dark strawberry-blond hair tangled around its solid iron handle that
was shaped like an “L”. Why it was never cleaned up after the murder
tends to sustain the bespectacled Leo Frank’s irrational state of mind
and short-sightedness.

Phagan crumpled to the floor, passing out at the feet of Leo Frank
towering above, whose heaving chest was rapidly breathing in gulps of
stale air, as he looked down upon her with vengeance. Frank’s face was
flushed with blood and shivering with tantalizing sexual intensity as his
bulging black dilated eyes were exaggerated outward from underneath
his wirerim glasses. Frank immediately dragged Phagan by the shoulders
to the doorway of the bathroom in the metal room, tossing her over on the
old waxy wooden floorboards like a sack of potatoes.

Kneeling down, Frank then ripped off a 3 inch wide strip of Phagan’s
petty coat midsagitally, tearing upward vertically at first from the hem of
her dress up to her crotch and then turning across horizontally, followed
by tearing down to the hem again, he put the bunched cotton material
behind her head like a sponge, to soak up the slowly leaking blood from
the lathe wound on the back and side of her head.

Next Frank frantically hiked up and pealed open her torn dress, spread her tender
baby fat thighs, ripped and carved open her knitted underwear across the vulva
with a small pocket knife, all the way to the right seam, unbuttoned his pants, pushed
his dirty underwear down, and hocked a thick disgusting loogey of coffee and tobacco
phlegm into his left palm, right onto his wedding band, and moving the thick snot-like
spittle around in circles with his thumb, before massaging it all around the tip of his
rock hard, STD infected, 4” erect penis.

Then the Vicious Psychopath Raped Mary Phagan.

Her innocence was torn away, bleeding. Phagan woke up disoriented in
dizzying pain from unconsciousness, putting her arms and hands over her
black and blue eyes, sobbing and crying out repeatedly, “No, No, No”,
with tears showering from her swollen face, trying to roll away under Leo
Frank was impossible.

In a moment of shame and humiliation, Leo Frank was unable to ejaculate, and
seeing his whole life pass before his own eyes in Phagans tear-drenched face.
Knowing his reputation in the widely assimilated German-Jewish community of the
South would be irreparably harmed if she told anyone about what happened. Knowing
his wife from a prominent Jewish family would surely seek divorce in the aftermath of
this unforgivable incident. Acknowledging the certainty his family in Brooklyn would
without a shadow of a doubt disown him for his unspeakable crime… In a flash of
frightened clarity and fear, Leo Frank knew he would be disgraced if anyone ever
found out, and that he would likely be living out his life breaking rocks on the chain
gang or worse, strangled at the end of a hangman’s noose, so there was no other
way out, but to permanently silence Phagan, so she couldn’t tell; and that’s just what
he did…

Frank stood up quickly looking around the room, he frenetically pulled himself
together in a moment and grabbed a nearby 7 foot long jute cord hanging off a
nail on the adjacent wall. With white knuckle fists flexing, he strangled Mary
Phagan to death, burying the cord 1/8th inches deep into her tender throat.
He got up and stepped backward from the scene, looking upon what he had
done as Phagan’s unseeing eyes stared hideously into the dusty emptiness.
His mind racing, he stood there transfixed to assess the situation and later called
his Negro Janitor, James “Jim” Conley, to help him remove the body from the metal
room and dispose off the cadaver in the oversized basement incinerator. Though
things did not happen as intended.

Leo Frank’s Deliciously Conspiratorial Racist Anti-Black Sub Plot:

However Conley refused the final step of stuffing Mary Phagan into the cellar
furnace and instead he agreed to ghostwrite death notes on behalf of Leo Frank,
framing the newly hired Negro nightwatchman that nobody really knew, named
Newton “Newt” Lee of Afro-Caribbean descent.

Newt Lee in his trademark faded blue overalls, was an old, honest, married,
dark complected, balding, tall and slim African-American man with no criminal
record to speakof, who had spent most of his life as a lanky graveyard shift
security guard, doing his rounds, shuffling his feet in slow motion with a smoky
lantern, seemingly bobbing in the inky darkness.

Leo’s gambit was secure after he promised Jim $200, if he kept his mouth shut.
Because of the White segregationist culture of the South, Leo Frank thought
that in the prevailing racial separatist South, even if Conley ever blabbed, no one
would ever believe the word of a Negro employee over a Whiteman who managed
a prominent factory. Conley would surely hang or likely get lynched if there was even
a shadow of a doubt he participated in the rape and murder of a teenage White girl!

The Shocking Discovery in the Cellar by the “Night Witch”:

On Sunday morning, Newt Lee — who the racist Jew Leo Frank tried to frame for the
murder — punched the time clock at 3:01 o’clock a.m. at Frank’s second floor office,
as he was required to do every half hour during his rounds. Lee feeling the call of nature,
went down to the basement to use the racially segregated “colored toilet” for “dropping
the cosbys off at the pool” and upon completing his “bidness”, he went to check the backdoor
service ramp. It was then in the gloom at 3:15 o’clock a.m., he discovered the mauled body
of an unknown child, dumped in the rear corner of the basement, at the location where
garbage was normally placed, before being burned in the cellar’s massive furnace-incinerator,
regularly used for heating the drafty four-floor building.

Lee shuffled briskly to the head of the basement, shimmied up the ladder to the first floor lobby,
in the inky darkness and then clambered up the creaky wooden steps, hustled into Leo Frank’s office and
used the wall telephone to contact his sleeping superintendent, but after 8 minutes of trying with
no answer, he hung up the phone and called the police. 18 minutes later a hammer fist was pounding
on the glass door at the entryway of the factory.

First Responders

When the police arrived, they followed Lee into the lobby and down the 14 ft ladder below
into the 80 foot wide, 200 feet long, Stygian catacomb-like tunnel. With primitive flashlights,
immediately found tracks indicating Mary Phagan had been dragged 140 feet from the elevator shaft,
across the hard dirt cinders of the basement floor, before being finally dumped diagonal to the
incinerator.

The body was removed by a wicker basket to P.J. Bloomfield’s mortuary just before 4 a.m.
Upon examination by the mortician, astonishingly, the deep pocks and scratches on her
face, from being dragged in the basement, didn’t show any signs of bleeding! This curious
medical detail, forensically suggested to the Coroner, and undertaker that she might have
already been dead before being taken to the basement. Physicians had known for centuries
that when the heart stops beating, the bleeding-scabbing cascade in the healing process
on the epidermis (skin) no longer occurs. It was an unfortunate detail the murderer had
never anticipated, when trying to make the basement look like the initial crime scene.

The Fiendish Pervert

Phagan’s underwear that was still attached around her hips, was
soaked in dried blood and discharge. Her dress was moist from top to
bottom in urine, suggesting that someone had pissed all over her entire
body. Wrapped around her neck was the strip of her blood soaked petty
coat, hiding what was underneath, the 7 foot jute cord cinched in a loop
around her neck, snugly buried 1/8 inches deep into the throat.

The knot was found on the front right side of Phagan’s neck, suggesting a left
handed man had strangled her. Only a fraction of the population is left handed,
narrowing down the suspects, it was later determined that Leo Frank was left
handed and Jim Conley was right handed.

Phagan’s face appeared purple and contorted, and her tongue stuck out from her
mouth through her teeth one inch. There were wounds on the side and back of her
head, and two below the knees. The upper side of her shirt at the chest level had
be torn open revealing her left breast. Her hair and entire front part of the body were
caked with coal cinders, dirt and debris, presumably from being dragged while faced
down across the hard earthen floor of the basement. Oddly, her arms were reverently
crossed over her bosom.

Phagan’s pocketbook made from German silver was missing and the red flowers attached
to the front of her pale cobalt blue hat were also missing. Her parasol was found at the bottom
of the garbage strewn elevator shaft tray, a few feet away from a coil of human excrement,
laid by 27-year-old sweeper Jim Conley. Members of the Jewish community would crassly claim
for more than a century that the feces at the bottom of the elevator shaft is what indisputably
exonerates Leo Frank, this BS theory (pun intended) is now commonly referred as the, ‘Shit
in the Shaft’ (Steve Oney, 2003, 2004).

Police tried all night long to contact the sleeping Frank, but he didn’t answer the phone, even
though the telephone was located in the dining room, directly below him on the first floor and
ringing obnoxiously under the wooden floor boards of his second floor marital bed chamber.

Finally the police were able to reach Leo Frank on the phone in the early dawn hours of
Sunday, April 27, 1913, letting him know they would be at his home shortly. When the police
first arrived at the Frank-Selig residence located on 68 east Georgia avenue, Leo was acting
very nervous, shivering, struggling to put on his collar and tie. The half dressed Frank kept
delaying the process of leaving his home, asking repeatedly for a cup of coffee, but the police
insisted he come with them immediately.

Inside the squad car, Leo Frank nervously claimed he didn’t know his employee Mary
Phagan or any of the other girls at the factory who worked for him, and denied knowing
Phagan’s name when he saw her mutilated corpse on a cooling slab at P.J. Bloomfield’s
mortuary.

When did Mary Phagan collect her pay?

On Sunday, April 27, 1913 at 8:26 a.m., after police and detectives took Leo Frank to
his second floor office at front section of the Pencil factory, he opened his four foot
tall iron safe, removed the payroll ledger, and told the accompanying officers he had had
paid off Mary Phagan at about 12:03 p.m. on Georgia Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday,
April 26, 1913.

The next day (Monday morning, April 28, 1913) in the presence of his elite
lawyers (Luther Rosser and Herbert Haas), Leo Frank made a stenographed
deposition to detectives and police at the Atlanta station-house that Mary
Phagan came into his office between “12:05pm and 12:10pm, maybe 12:07pm”
on Saturday, April 26, 1913 (State’s Exhibit B, Leo Frank Trial Brief of
Evidence, 1913).

What Leo Frank did not know at the time of the sadistic rape-murder
is that 5’2″ tall, 14-year-old Monteen Stover (Iola Stover),
another little girl who had been laid off early in the week for the same
reason as Mary — because the brass sheet metal had run out — was
waiting inside his office all by her lonesome self. According to Monteen
Stover, she waited in Leo Frank’s business office from 12:05 p.m. to
12:10 p.m. based on his wall clock, hoping to collect her pay envelope,
but she left after waiting for 5 full minutes, because she thought the
building might have been deserted due to the state holiday.

Leo Frank’s Alibi From Sunday, April 27, 1913 to Monday August 18 1913

For 3.5 months, Leo Frank swore to the alibi that he never left his office
when Phagan arrived, until 12:45pm that fateful day, to go upstairs to the
fourth floor, but then on the witness stand at his trial on Monday afternoon,
August 18, 1913, he —- Reversed himself —- making a newfangled and never before
heard, ineluctable admission to explain why Monteen Stover had found his office
empty during the exact same time he had told the police Mary Phagan was with
him in his office (State’s Exhibit B, Monday, April 28, 1913; Monteen
Stover’s Testimony, Brief of Evidence, 1913).

Taking the Stand During his Month Long Trial: Leo Frank Changed His Alibi

Frank seated comfortably on the stand, said, “NOW GENTLEMEN”, looked
the jurors in their eyes and announced to a packed courtroom, that he
might have gone to the bathroom in the metal room to use the toilet or
urinate — at that critical time (12:05pm to 12:10pm) — and that those were
things that a man does “unconsciously”. (He would re-assert this incriminating
admission in a jailhouse interview published in the
March 9, 1914 edition of the Atlanta Constitution).

It was deliciously ironic for unbiased observers who simply wanted to
arrive at the truth, but for Leo Frank’s detractors, it was the equivalent of
an inescapable murder trial confession, because Frank had contradicted
and entrapped himself beyond escape in the metal room, where all the
forensic evidence (hair and blood) indicated a deadly encounter had occurred.

Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann (August 8, 1898 – March 18, 1985)

Leo Frank’s defenders would spend generations suppressing this testimony about
his “unconscious” metalroom bathroom incident and claim that all the best evidence
at the trial and modern analysis, indicates that Jim Conley assaulted Phagan in factory
lobby on the first floor, where there was no evidence found after the murder discovery,
except for seven decades later, when a senile octogenarian named Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann
(August 8, 1898 – March 18, 1985) — who was formerly Leo Frank’s office boy in 1913 for
three weeks — in 1982 came forward 69 years after the verdict, claiming he saw Conley
carrying an unconscious Mary Phagan and moving toward the Lobby’s scuttle-hole, thus
suggesting the disposal of the victim was by the stairs, instead of the elevator as Conley
stated, contradicting Conley’s testimony at the trial, where he admitted carrying the corpse
of Phagan to the basement for Leo Frank by elevator. Alonzo Mann’s revelations added
no new evidence to the case other than only changing the disposal path, and Mann lacked
veracity, because he testified to leaving at 11:30 a.m. in 1913, not Noon as he claimed in
1982. Alonzo Mann, also claimed Jim Conley threatened his life if he told anyone and this
is where his story began to defy commonsense when questioned about what happened thereafter.

70 years after the murder, Alonzo Mann, told journalists at the Tennessean newspaper
that he originally told his parents what he saw on that fateful day and they told him not to
say anything. It left most people incredulous, what White family would tell their son, not to
report a murder conducted by a Negro in the racial separatist South. And why would White
parents allow their son to report to work the following Monday morning, if their child had his
life threatened by murdering Negro. Why did Alonzo say nothing to police after Conley was arrested
and there was no threat of Mann being harmed? We can only speculate, but commonsense
tells us that Mann is lying. It was claimed that Mann was given a lie detector test, but the
video of it and the results from the machine’s printer where never shown to the public and
allegedly “lost”, before they could be scrutinized by independent experts.

The Subversive ADL of B’nai B’rith and Alonzo Mann, 1986

However, The racist Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and powerful Jewish groups of
the American-Israeli Lobby used this questionable evidence given by Alonzo Mann, to secure a
posthumous pardon for Leo Frank on a technicality, thus the pardon was *without exoneration
for the crime* – a detail usually left out in most retellings of the Leo Frank Case. Though Frank
was not officially absolved of his crime, Jewish groups make it a point to leave out this salient
fact when they put historical markers at 1) Mary Phagan’s grave and 2) Leo Frank’s lynching site.

The Prosecution’s Theory: The Metal Room at Back of Second Floor.

The “unconscious” toilet revelation by Leo Frank on the witness stand was an earth
shattering retort to Monteen Stover, because earlier in the trial, Jim Conley said he
found Mary Phagan dead in the bathroom area of the metal room at the behest of
Leo Frank, who according to Conley, confessed to Jim about murdering her (Phagan)
there, because she refused to “be with him” (have sex with Leo Frank).

Forensic Evidence: Blood on the Floor and Hair on the Lathe

Employee witnesses for the defense and prosecution had already testified
to finding a 5 inch wide dried blood puddle diagonal to the bathroom door in
the metal room and about a lock of Phagan’s bloody hair tangled around
the solid metal handle of the bench lathe in the same room.

So it all came together at the trial when Leo Frank testified for nearly four
hours, rambling away and making numerous incriminating statements.

Had you been sitting in the Jury box or behind the judge’s Rostrum on August 18, 1913,
listening to Leo Frank’s explanation for why his office might have been empty, when he
had formerly claimed to the police he was in his office alone with Mary Phagan at that
exact same time, you would have involuntarily shivered as cold chills spilled down your
spine, but for more than 100 years, the Jewish community continues to wage an anti-White
racist defamation campaign against Gentiles, claiming Southerners framed Leo Frank,
indicted and convicted him because he was Jewish and later hanged him because he was Jewish.
The narrative that anti-Semitism was behind it all, has been perpetuated aggressively in
the mainstream now for more than 100 years and has become the popular culture dogma and
orthodoxy in the academy, but is the tide changing? Are Jewish lies finally disintegrating?

The Leo Frank Case has evolved into the longest running anti-Semitic Hate
crime hoax and anti-Gentile blood libel slander in the history of the United
States of America.

The conviction of Leo Frank galvanized the formation of the Anti-Defamation League of
B’nai B’rith in October, 1913, after the 500 member strong Atlanta B’nai B’rith voted
unanimously, (Atlanta Constitution, September 24, 1913), to re-elect their “wrongfully”
convicted and death-row inmate President Leo Max Frank to a second term as their beloved
leader.

Leo Frank ran the affairs of his B’nai B’rith chapter behind bars until September
of 1914, when he was not re-elected again for a third presidential term and as
his appeals were falling apart, primarily because of the criminal activity leaked
publicly involving bribing and coercing witnesses to change their testimony
(Georgia Supreme Court Records, 1,800 pages, 1913, 1914).

Jewry’s Racist Anti-Gentle Hate Crime Hoax

Leonard Dinnerstein (PhD Dissertation 1966 to 2012+ almost 50 years), Abraham Foxman (Op Ed
August 18, 2005) and ADL have been at the forefront of perpetuating the hate crime hoax that
people were loudly chanting “hang the Jew” and “Kill the Jew” outside the Leo Frank trial courtroom
that had all of its windows wide open during the proceedings, because of the hot summer days. This
is a viciously racist anti-Gentile Big Lie perpetuated by ADL and Abraham Foxman, Leonard
Dinnerstein, and many other hatefilled Jewish domestic extremists, spreading bigoted racially tinged
smears against European-American Southerners. (see the articles about Abraham Foxman’s hatecrime
hoax and Leonard Dinnerstein’s pseudo-history)

The Last Taboo of the Jewish Community: Pedophilia

Why anyone would transform a fiendish child molester and convicted
child killer into a martyr of anti-Semitism is incomprehensible, but
Jason Robert Brown and Alfred Uhry have made millions of dollars with
their musical ‘Parade’ performing literally globewide, falsifying
the official records of the Leo Frank Trial and rehabilitating a violent
child molester, who would be a registered sex offender today and likely
would be gang raped by HIV+ inmates in prison.

A dead little raped teenage girl, is used as a cheap plot device to
wage a vicious racist culture war against Southerners. Many people are
asking: Are these the treacherous people we want determining our popular
culture? Are these the people we want determining the theatre curriculum
in our public schools and colleges? Is this the group of people we want
dominating our mainstream media?

A broader question we might ask: Are these the kinds people we want as
our politicians, judges, teachers, professors, and civil rights leaders?!
Especially when they are so able and willing to lie?

Jews calling the Leo Frank Case an American Dreyfus Affair, or comparing the
Frank-Phagan affair to Menahem Mendel Beilis, for more than a century is more than
unconscionable chutzpah, its an act of racist insolence. The Leo Frank trial is being
relentlessly used as a morality tale for the purpose of shaming and deracinating
European-Americans into denying their tradition of ethnic solidarity and wrongfully
making Americans think they destroyed an innocent and noble man because he was
Jewish. This is the old mask of anti-Gentile defamation that began in 1913, with a
turn of the the 21st century face lift.

Lucille Selig

If you have even any doubts about Leo Frank’s innocence or guilt,
then listen to the silent echo in time and space from the spirit of
Lucille Selig Frank (February 29, 1888 – April 23, 1957).

If you ever get a chance, go to the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, New York City,
visit Leo Frank’s grave, and look to the left of it and stare at the empty grave.
The empty grave was reserved for Lucille Selig, so ask yourself, why is it still
empty in 2013? If you have doubts that grave is still empty, go to the cemetery front
office at the gate entry and ask them if it is indeed empty or not, because they will
tell you it is absolutely empty.

You can actually write an official letter to the cemetery requesting
information about the Frank-Stern family grave site and they will
respond on letterhead, this is if you want more than just verbal proof, but
official proof about the emptiness of grave plot #1 located immediate left of
grave plot #2 where Leo Frank is interred.

You would think otherwise after reading all the insistent, shrill denials in
mainstream massmedia for the last 100 years; books, made-for-TV movies,
miniseries (Murder of Mary Phagan, Jan 24 and 26, 1988) and docudramas
(2009), including heart-tugging plays (Knights of Mary Phagan by
Jesse Waldinger) and even a Broadway stage musical (Parade by Jason Robert
Brown and Alfred Uhry) in New York that continues to spread globally like
wildfire – that suggest Lucille’s love for her husband Leo Frank was
eternal and lasted till the day she passed away and beyond her death.

So, once again, why did she specifically not want to be buried next to
Leo Frank? (She requested an Atlanta Park according to her Nephew Alan
and Harold Marcus, sons of Sarah Selig (sister of Lucille) and Charles
Marcus).

See: Georgia Magazine, Steve Oney, Features, Up Front, March 2004: Vol. 83, No. 2.

Finally, why were Lucille’s ashes not spread or buried next to Leo Frank?

Because Lucille was no feather brained step-ford wife when all is
said and done. If she really loved Leo Frank eternally, beyond the dog
and pony show of appearances, she would have been buried in, or
requested her ashes spread at, the empty grave next to him that was
reserved for her at the Mount Carmel Cemetery, but she left her own
verdict on the Leo Frank trial from the passing of her life, and the silence
speaks deafening volumes ever since she died long ago on April 23, 1957 of
heart disease (broken heart), just 3 short days before the 44th anniversary
of the Mary Phagan murder.

If you want to learn what really happened at the Leo Frank trial,
visit The American Mercury
on the Internet and read their August,
September, and October, 2013, Leo Frank Case reports. The
American Mercury
has published an absolutely superb multi-part
series on the centennial of the Leo Frank trial. It’s chock full of
images and thoughtful analysis, you would never get from other
sources, who erroneously and willfully go out of their way to
intentionally distort what happened in the Fulton County court
house 100 years ago (July 28, 1913 – August 26, 1913). Read
the articles in the American Mercury about Steve Oney and Leonard
Dinnerstein as well, uncovering their pseudo-history.

The Jewish Daily Forward www.Forward.com and Abraham Foxman www.ADL.org
are rabidly foaming at the mouth about the American Mercury and Leo Frank
research websites, because 100 years of lies that have aggressively been
pushed into the orthodoxy of social history are slowly disintegrating. Some
members of the Jewish community never dreamed the 1,800 page Leo Frank
Georgia Supreme Court archives would end up being published online at
the centennial of the Mary Phagan murder, April 26, 2013, available for
the whole world to read, but now there is no escape from the disturbing
truth revealed within these official records about Frank’s defenders.

100 Years of Jewish Censorship Coming to an End

Soon the world is going to find out about another child laborer Leo
Frank sadistically defiled, one year before Mary Phagan was raped and
killed. After the Leo Frank trial ended another little girl came forward
with descriptions of a harrowing incident… In 1912, Leo Frank raped
another one of his child employees, and when he was done ravaging her,
he slithered down between her legs and bit her so hard on the inner thy
adjacent to the vagina, that he permanently scarified her, but this
didn’t come out until Leo Frank’s appeals, because the girl had gotten
pregnant and was thereafter shipped off to a home for unwed mothers!

This is the story of a sadistic pedophile, who has been used as a seditious
bludgeon for a century to attack, defame, smear, slander, blood libel, and hate
hoax Americans! This is the man being held up as a holy religious martyr
of anti-Semitism and Gentile injustice. Phagan is the girl whose virgin blood and
strangled corpse gave birth to the financially and politically powerful
ADL, the racist anti-Gentile hate group masquerading as a civil rights
organization, who honor Leo Frank as heroic and whose trial is a
reminder that “not too long ago anti-Semitism, not the facts, convicted
an innocent man”.

We will never forget Mary Phagan and we will never stop fighting for
her honor until our very last dying breath. We will never stop fighting
against the century old culture defamation and race war waged by the
Jewish community, ADL, Jewish Groups and SPLC, against the South,
Southerners, European-Americans and all of Western Civilization.

Visit the American Mercury now and read the Leo Frank Trial Transcript
Analysis: www.theamericanmercury.org

Source: www.tumblr.com/blog/leomaxfrank (Warning Graphic Content,
Viewer Discretion is Advised, Must be 21 or older to view)

From Wikipedia:

Parade is a musical with a book by Alfred Uhry and music and lyrics by
Jason Robert Brown. The musical was first produced on Broadway at the
Vivian Beaumont Theater on December 17, 1998. The production was
directed by Harold Prince and closed 28 February 1999 after only 39
previews and 84 regular performances. It starred Brent Carver as Leo
Frank, Carolee Carmello as Lucille Frank, and Christy Carlson Romano as
Mary Phagan.

The musical won Tony Awards for best book and best score (out of nine
nominations) and six Drama Desk Awards. The show has enjoyed a U.S.
national tour and numerous professional and amateur productions in both
the U.S. and abroad.

Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parade_%28musical%29

The whole conspiratorial premise of Gentile anti-Semitism woven
through the 21st century production of, ‘Parade’, is to mask the Jewish
racism against African-Americans and European-Americans inherent
in the Leo Frank Case, which has become an agitation campaign to spread
indignation, insecurity and fear amongst Jews.

For numerous generations now, Jews have manipulated the Leo Frank case
into a fraudulent Jewish persecution themed fiction, meant to demoralize Gentiles,
especially European-American Gentiles. Some Jews according to the Holy
Talmud, don’t consider it a crime, if one of their own racial kinsmen pounds
in the face of a little White Christian girl, before ripping her clothes open and
savagely raping the child, moments before strangling her to death.

Parade is a Disgusting Mockery of Legal History

What this re-engineered Broadway play does NOT tell the audience is
Leo Frank botched a most diabolically racist intrigue, a poorly
orchestrated attempt to have the murder of Mary Phagan framed on two
African-Americans. That’s the dirty truth about the Leo Frank Case that his
defenders tried to suppress for 100 years. The other dirty little secret is
that Leo Frank changed his alibi on the witness stand and placed himself
at the scene of the crime, where and when the murder occurred.

Alleged Pedophile Alan Dershowitz and other powerful members of the Jewish community,
would arraign the Jury, accusing them of being blinded by prejudice, because they
convicted a Jewish Pedophile.

The Ugly Racist Jewish-American Culture Wars Continue…

More excellent sources on the Frank-Phagan Case include:

0. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913

The first neutral book written on the subject. Very interesting read.

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean
(Available here on http://www.Archive.org). Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the
great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events
surrounding the trial of Leo Frank. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is
well worth reading and it is a refreshing change from the endless number
of Jewish and contemporary books turning the Leo Frank case into a
neurotic race obsessed tabloid controversy.

2. American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson
Tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team,
this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence,
leaving out some important things said and details when it republishes
parts of the trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of
Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh
Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial
testimony, read the 1913 Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence.

3. Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank
Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the
end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies
of this books. This is an excellent book and required reading to see how
Dorsey in sales vernacular ‘closed’ the panel of 13 men, the trial jury
of 12 men plus Judge Leonard Strickland Roan.

4. Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error.
In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of
Evidence. Extremely rare, only 1 copy exists, and it is at the Georgia State Archive.

It is available on www.Archive.org

Three Major Atlanta Daily Newspapers: The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta
Journal, The Atlanta Georgian. The most relevant issues center around April
28th to August 27th 1913.

5. Atlanta Constitution Newspaper: The Murder of Mary Phagan, Coroner’s
Inquest, Grand Jury, Investigation, Trail, Appeals, Shanking and
Lynching of Leo Frank Case in the Atlanta Constitution Newspaper from
1913 to 1915. http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

6. Atlanta Georgian newspaper covering the Leo Frank Case from

April though August, 1913. http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

7. Atlanta Journal Newspaper, April, 28, 1913, through till the end of August, 1913, pertaining to

the Leo Frank Case: http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

Leo Frank said Mary Phagan had been with him in his second floor, window front office on April 26, 1913,
between 12:05pm and 12:10pm (States Exhibit B). Leo Frank confirms he might have been in the toilet
where Phagan was found dead, at the time Monteen Stover said his office was empty (12:05 p.m. to 12:10 p.m.):

See the Atlanta Constitution, Monday, March 9, 1914, Leo Frank Jailhouse Interview

Tom Watson

8. Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper (1914, 1915, 1916 and 1917) and
Watson’s Magazine(1915). Tom Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank case
was published in August and September 1915.

https://archive.org/details/the-jeffersonian-050714-may-07-1914-volume-11-issue-19-pages-01-03-05-09-10

Watson’s five major magazine works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide
logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with the superb
reasoning of a genius criminal attorney.

These five 1915 works are absolutely required reading for anyone
interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Originals of these magazines are
extremely rare and very difficult to find.

Jan 1915:

8.1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case.

Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source

March 1915:

8.2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20.
No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’.
Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source

https://archive.org/details/TheFullReviewOfTheLeoFrankCaseMarch1915

August 1915:

8.3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson
(August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of
the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company,
Thomson, Ga., Digital Source

Tom Watson: The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank

September 1915:

8.4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson
(September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record
in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing
Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source

Tom Watson: The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, a Jew Pervert

October 1915:

8.5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo
Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301.
Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source:

Tom Watson: The Rich Jews Indict a State!

Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper

9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson

There are Leo Frank cult members (Frankites) posing as neutral reviewers who do not want you to read Tom Watson’s five 1915 magazine works on the Leo Frank trial, read them and find out why! They are the controversial forbidden fruit of truth in the Leo M. Frank case that have been censored for more than 100 years. Because Jews are making up lies about Tom Watson, we need people to download Tom Watsons five articles about the Leo Frank case (Jan, March, August, Sept and October, 1915), translate them into every language and upload them to every online library in the world. (The March 1915 issue was “accidentally” deleted by the staff of www.Archive.org The Internet Archive, so that means download it, and then upload it to all the different free online libraries in the world, translate it to every European language)

Tom Watson Brown, Grandson of Thomas Edward Watson

10. Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank, By Tom W. Brown, Emery University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982. (This was “accidentally” deleted by the staff of www.Archive.org The Internet Archive, so that means download it, and then upload it to all the different free online libraries in the world, translate it to every European language)

Leo Frank trial analysis and review of books about the case of Mary Phagan:

11. 100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty by Bradford L. Huie

Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Record Archive:

12. Leo Frank Trial and Appeals Georgia Supreme Court File (1,818 pages).

http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Read two dozen articles about the rape-strangulation of Mary Phagan by Leo Frank the toilet strangler at http://www.liveleak.com/c/jambo2010

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Multicultural News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Zionism  Comments Closed

Kill All Pedophiles by John de Nugent

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Speech, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

ADL Sponsored Alonzo Mann Hoax for the Posthumous Pardon of Leo Frank in 1986: Anniversary of Leo Frank Decision by Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles



March 11th is the anniversary of Leo Max Frank’s Posthumous Pardon that was officiated in 1986 thanks to the ADL taking the lead for many years, pressing this issue hard behind the scenes. Despite the ADL taking the lead on this effort, three Jewish organizations worked together in this effort: Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, Atlanta Jewish Federation and American Jewish Committee. These three groups worked together in a coordinated effort, pressuring the government of Georgia to get an illegal posthumous pardon. The pardon was in fact illegal because only the convict can legally petition the government, others can not do it on his or her behalf once they are deceased. Fortunately the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles did not officially exonerate or absolve Leo Frank of the murder when they rendered their posthumous pardon.

Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann in 1913, he was office boy of Leo M. Frank for three weeks at the time of the Phagan murder. Alonzo Mann was born August 8, 1898 and died March, 1985 in Bristol, Virginia, United States of America.
According to Leonard Dinnerstein,

There is no reason to doubt that Alonzo Mann’s affidavit is accurate. Had he ignored his mother’s advice and gone to the police with his information right away, Conley would surely have been arrested, the police and district attorney would not have concentrated their efforts on finding Frank guilty, and the crime would most likely have been quickly solved. But by the time the trial began, in July 1913, Mann’s testimony might hardly have even seemed important.

Source: The Fate of Leo Frank, American Heritage, October 1996 | Volume 47, Issue 6

See: the American Mercury’s article about Leonard Dinnerstein’s pseudo-history book called the ‘Leo Frank Case’.

What Really Happened in 1913?

August 1913, Alonzo Mann, sworn for the Defendant. Official Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913:

Alonzo Mann, Testifies during Direct Examination:

I am office boy at the National Pencil Company. I began working there [Tuesday] April 1, 1913. I sit sometimes in the outer office and stand around in the outer hall. I left the factory at half past eleven on April 26th. When I left there, Miss Hall, the stenographer from Montag’s, was in the office with Mr. Frank. Mr. Frank told me to phone to Mr. Schiff and tell him to come down. I telephoned him, but the girl answered the phone and said he hadn’t got up yet. I telephoned once. I worked there two Saturday afternoons of the weeks previous to the murder and stayed there until half past three or four. Frank was always working during that time. I never saw him bring any women into the factory and drink with them. I have never seen Dalton there. On April 26th, I saw Holloway, Irby, McCrary and Darley at the factory. I didn’t see Quinn. I don’t remember seeing Corinthia Hall, Mrs. Freeman, Mrs. White, Graham, Tillander, or Wade Campbell, I left there 11:30 [AM].

CROSS EXAMINATION.

When Mr. Frank came that morning, he went right on into the office, and was at work there and stayed there. He went out once. Don’t know how long he stayed out.

End of Testimony.

Flash Forward to the 1980’s.

From 1982 to 1985, and 1986 Onward

Alonzo Mann, one of the last surviving Leo Frank defense witnesses, came forward some 69 years later in 1982, and provided some very questionable testimony.

The ADL and the Highly Political Posthumous Pardon

Alonzo Mann’s affidavit became the basis of an attempt to obtain a ‘posthumous pardon with exoneration’ for Leo Frank from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. The effort was led by two Jewish-American attorneys: Charles Wittenstein, southern counsel for the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL), and Dale Schwartz, an Atlanta lawyer.

[Insert Photo of Charles Wittenstein and Dale M. Schwartz here]

What does common sense tell us?

Common sense tells us most of what Alonzo Mann had to say is likely to be untrue, for a number of reason that will be discussed. The further away in time the memory is from the original event, the more likely it becomes distorted and easily manipulated. How would a 21st century State Supreme Court or United States Supreme Court weigh testimony that comes 69 years after the fact? An even more salient question is: Could such a revelation as Alonzo Mann’s in 1982, even if true, be worthy to exonerate Leo Frank? You decide

Background: On April 1st, 1913, Alonzo Mann, a thirteen year old boy, had scored his highly coveted job as Leo Frank’s personal officeboy at the National Pencil Company. Given Mann was not at the factory long enough (3.5 weeks) to really provide an accurate assessment concerning Leo Frank’s character at the time of the murder, one is not inclined to believe he had known Leo Frank long enough to make an accurate character assessment of him. Moreover one is inclined to believe the young teenage officeboy was a bit starstruck and naive back then, which tended to cause him to be unaware of the “extracurricular activities” going on in the factory under the tutelage of Leo M. Frank as general superintendent for almost 5 years at the time (August 10th, 1908- April 26, 1913).

Flash Forward from 1913, Some 69 Years Later to 1982 when the Story Broke.

In 1982 Alonzo Mann was in the gloaming winter of his life, frail and in terrible physical condition. Alonzo Mann was perched on a cane, had a pacemaker, and was on a cocktail of pharmaceuticals. Mann was truly lonely, the WWI veteran had sadly outlived his wife and only son. His virtual “death-bed” revelation in the years before he died, had all the flare of a fictionalized Hollywood drama and Broadway musical, and the markings of another backroom bribery deal, which has to date, always been the central strategy of Leo Frank’s defenders for more than a century. The Georgia Supreme Court Records containing Leo Frank’s appeals reveal the machinations of this ugly Jewish criminal soap opera that has become a racist anti-Gentile hoax of centenary proportions. Even today, Jews are still pressing for the posthumous exoneration of Leo Frank. On the centennial of Leo Frank’s lynching Rabbi Steven Lebow and a coterie of Jewish judges, attorneys and other prominent officials of Atlanta’s government held a well advertised, public affair to agitate the governor, Nathan Deal, to exonerate Leo Frank. Nathan Deal refused the absurdity. He read the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence that has been suppressed for a century by Jewish groups.

Nearly 70 Years Later After the Murder of Mary Phagan:

In 1982, Alonzo Mann changed his original story and alleged that he really left the NPCo factory at noon, instead of 11:30 a.m. as he had formerly testified long ago in 1913. Alonzo having changed his story from the one he propounded 7 decades early, went on to say further that five minutes after he left the NPCo factory (noon), he came back at 12:05 p.m. and saw the 27-year-old Negro Janitor Jim Conley, carrying the limp body of Mary Phagan on his shoulder, positioned as if getting ready to dump Phagan down the 2foot-by-2foot scuttle hole — a trapdoor next to the elevator. Jim Conley then allegedly reached out for Alonzo Mann and said to the young boy, “If you tell anyone, I will kill you”. And Alonzo Mann, claimed further that he then ran home and told his family and his parents told their young son (Alonzo), not to tell anyone or get involved. Alonzo Mann said he keep this new story as a secret for 70 years, and didn’t tell the whole truth when questioned at the trial.

Does that seem logical? or does that set off your highly refined bullshit detector?

In 1982, Alonzo Mann’s statement did not pass multiple commonsense tests and came off as desperate concoctions of coached lies according to every neutral person who heard his belated revelation and knows the history of Southern culture.

First, why would White parents in the White racial separatist Atlanta, Georgia, of 1913, tell their White son not to tell the police about a “murdering” and “guilty” Negro janitor Jim Conley, when the result of not telling the police would ultimately result in an “innocent”, clean cut, and White boss, Leo Frank, who gave their son a highly prized job, going to gallows for a crime he didn’t commit instead of a “guilty” Negro janitor? Given that in the Old South, African-Americans were regarded as third class citizens with child-like mental and emotional maturity, once Conley was locked up, he would have no longer been a threat. Conley remained in in jail from the time he was arrested on Thursday, May 1st, 1913, until late 1914 when he was released after serving a sentence for being an accessory after the fact. Why didn’t Alonzo come forward while Conley was serving his sentence? It was known to every one in Atlanta through the three daily newspapers that Conley was sentenced to one year in jail. Do these circumstances and behaviors pass the commonsense test?

Second, why would White parents, in a white separatist south, allow their son to report to work on Monday Morning, April 28, 1913, 2 days after their son was “threatened with death by a Negro carrying a dead or unconscious white girl on his shoulder Saturday April 26, 1913, at five minutes past noon”. Jim Conley reported back to work on Monday morning, April 28, 1913, as did the 170 employees who were naturally expected to be back at work after the holiday weekend. Jim Conley was not arrested until Thursday, May 1st, 1913 and Alonzo Mann reported to work everyday as expected. Why would White parents allow their son to go back to work in the cavernous factory where their son could easily be assaulted or killed by Conley the Black man who threatened their sons life?  If you had a child who worked somewhere, and your child came home one Saturday afternoon, and then told you they had seen a fellow employee carrying the dead body of another child and that employee threatened to kill your child, would you let your child go back to work days later where that same alleged murderer was still working there? Does that pass the commonsense test? Put the question to someone who is a mother or father, and has a teenage child.

Third, if Alonzo Mann admitted in the 1980s to lying under oath at the Leo Frank trial in 1913, “withholding information when questioned” and “leaving at 11:30 a.m. instead of Noon” as he contended 69 years later, what’s not to say he wasn’t lying again between all the years he made his new revelations from 1982 and beyond? Relying on our commonsense can we trust him when he admitted to lying under oath at a murder trial?

Fourth, If Alonzo Mann walked in on Jim Conley at 12:05 p.m., getting ready to throw Mary Phagan down the scuttlehole at the Lobby, why did Monteen Stover not bump into this alleged scene? Monteen Stover testified she arrived at the factory at about this exact time. Why didn’t Leo Frank who was less than 40 feet away not hear Phagan scream? Where was Leo Frank when Monteen Stover waited in his vacant office between 12:05 p.m. and 12:10 p.m.? These questions can be closely examined in detail when consulting the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence.

Let’s take a closer look at the circumstances, Southern Culture and Ask Common Sense Questions.

If we are to believe Alonzo Mann that he saw Jim Conley carrying the unconscious body of Mary Phagan, isn’t it rather odd that in a White racial separatist south, given the invitation of an extremely violent lynching, a Southern Negro would assault, rob and carrying the body of a White girl across the highest traffic place in the factory with the front door unlocked? Leo Frank said more than a dozen people entered and left his second floor business office during the morning period from 8:30 a.m. till noon. Many of these visitors testified to seeing Jim Conley sitting idly on a crate that morning at side of the staircase in the ground floor lobby. Conley also described seeing people coming and going, when he was seated there (coorborating), would he have assaulted White female employee without locking the front door? There were literally hundreds of people outside the factory walking parallel to the front door, in both directions on the sidewalk. The front door to the factory was a large Glass paned door that people could see into very easily or hear a high pitched scream.

In 1906 four white women were gang raped by Negroes in Atlanta, and a White mob went berserk killing dozens of Blacks, so we might ask, would a Negro be so brazen given what they know about White men, castrating without anesthesia, black men who assault their daughters and wives? Finally, putting it all together: On a day like Georgia Confederate Memorial Day, when the emotions of White people were particularly saddened, outraged and inflamed at the reminder of their great war for independence lost, does that make sense that a Negro would attack a White girl in broad day light with so many people right outside the front glass window door, where people could see into the building so clearly, or easily hear a girl’s scream from being assaulted, or where employees where constantly coming into the factory and the door was left unlocked? Does this pass the common sense test when we consider all these factors?

During the Leo Frank trial, the defense team changed its theory of how the attack against Mary Phagan transpired. In one theory, Mary Phagan was crowded back to the empty area of the former Clarke woodenware company on the first floor (see State’s Exhibit A and Defendant’s Exhibit 61, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence), assaulted, and thrown down a trapdoor at the rear of the building, but there was only one problem, it was determined well before the trial that the owner of the National Pencil Company building that rented only the basement, 2nd, 3rd and fourth floor to Sigmund Montag, had NOT rented the first floor (ground floor office space) and had locked the door to that back area office space on the first floor 4 months earlier before the murder occurred in Jan 1913, when the Clarke wooden ware company departed, and the door was still locked when the police came to the premises on Sunday, April 27, 1913. Some unknown person broke that door lock open 4 days after the murder.

At another time during the trial the Leo Frank defense said Mary Phagan’s body was thrown 14 feet down to the basement below via the 2-foot wide square scuttle hole near the elevator at the front of the building, which had a ladder diagonally going downward to the cellar. In other defense theories, Jim Conley murdered Phagan in the basement. The defense did not commit to a solid theory during the trial and it gave people the impression they couldn’t come up with a consistent theory. 

The defense theories in 1913 to 1915, and every year since then, up until now in the year 2013, keep changing and slowly mutating.

Wouldn’t there have been forensic evidence on the body of a 4’11” and 107 lbs girl, if she were alive and had fallen 14 feet from the lobby to the basement? Mary Phagan had numerous autopsies performed on her by doctors in late April and early May of 1913, none of the reports mention any broken bones or indications on her body that she had fallen 14 feet to a hard dirt floor. Fourteen feet is a significant height that anyone thrown down would without a doubt have forensic evidence of the fall. In fact the forensic evidence shows that the scratches on her face caused by her being dragged 150 feet across the basement floor from the elevator to the rear of the cellar, had no blood coming from them, indicating she was already quite dead when she taken to the basement. Physicians knew for centuries that when a person is dead, the bleeding and healing process ceases in the skin. This forensic fact would likely have not been known to Leo Frank and Jim Conley.

The autopsy reports revealed she had died of strangulation and the black eye suggested a left handed man punched her in the face. What percentage of people are left handed? According to Wikipedia.org, “A variety of studies suggest that 70–90% of the world population is right-handed.” (Wikipedia Lefthandedness, 2013). Since Leo Frank was left handed and Jim Conley right handed who was more likely to have punched her in the right eye with a left fist?

What about the hair with dried blood found on the lathe handle in the metalroom and the blood stains on its floor? These forensic details are seldom discussed by Leo Frank’s defenders who claim he is innocent.

Did Jim Conley’s Testimony Sustain Itself?

Jim Conley alleged he was waiting in the lobby all morning long, because Leo M. Frank had asked him to wait there as a watchdog for him regarding a planned afternoon tryst. Is there an unwritten subtext here? Jim Conley claimed to have had served as Leo’s watchdog on numerous other Saturdays when Frank entertained other women. Did Leo Frank have a preplanned tryst arranged with Mary? If so it adds a new dimension to the case never before explored. For the purposes of history, if we consider the Konigsberg variation of the murder, that Mary Phagan had a pre-arranged tryst with Leo Frank, then it reveals that perhaps this case is even more bizarre than we might have ever thought. And then the question that arises is, why then did Leo Frank murder Mary Phagan?

Did Leo Frank lie about not knowing Jim Conley was at the factory that day?

If Alonzo Mann was indeed telling the truth about Jim Conley sitting there all morning long doing nothing, it opens up a permutation in the Game theory of the Leo Frank Case, suggesting Leo Frank might have definitely fibbed to the court when he gave his unsworn statement to the Jury on August 18, 1913: Frank said he did not even know Jim Conley was in the factory at all that day on April 26, 1913 (Leo Frank Trial Statement, Brief of Evidence, August 18, 1913).

How could Leo Frank not know Jim Conley was there, when Leo Frank admitted at the trial that during the morning, he left the building and came back after running some errands during a brief trip to Sigmund Montag’s office down the street to get the corporate mail (Leo Frank, Brief of Evidence, August 18, 1913). How could Leo Frank miss seeing a Negro sitting next to the staircase all morning long?

The common sense test is now called:

If Leo Frank did not know Jim Conley was there all morning long at the factory on Saturday, April 26, 1913, the logical question follows, what was an employee of the factory, Jim Conley, who was “not” required to work on a Saturday and state holiday, doing, sitting on a crate next to the staircase on the first floor lobby all morning long, wasting time watching people come and go?

Most African Americans would argue that never in the history of the universe would a Blackman go to work on a Saturday, State Holiday and day off, unless he was require to by his boss. Especially in light of the fact Jim Conley had been paid his weekly salary the evening before on Friday, April 25, 1913 at 6:30 PM by Leo M. Frank. At 5 cents a beer and 3 cents a whiskey, its hard to imagine Jim Conley would have spent all of his salary on booze the night before and still been functional to come to work bright and early the next day. It just doesn’t seem realistic that Jim Conley could have drank 120 beers ($6 divided by 5 cents) the night before and would need to rob, rape, and strangle a White girl in the highest traffic point of the National Pencil Company factory to get more money. Wouldn’t the drunken African-American stumble bum rather bide his time drinking five cent pints at any Russian-Jewish owned Saloon (Russian Jews generally served Negroes Beer, when it was generally an unwritten rule at the time to never sell drinks to Negroes in White owned Saloons).

The African-American Christian Perspective

African-American Christian observers are wondering when in the “11,000 year history” of the Universe has a black man gone to work on his day off and a state holiday, when he was not required. Especially in light of the fact he was just paid off his salary which was oddly much higher ($6.05 vs. $4.05) than the wages of the average laborer at the factory. Jim Conley coming to work on his day off, on his own, just didn’t fit or make sense, unless he was asked to come to work by his boss Leo Frank. Surely an employee like Jim Conley who had two years tenure (1911 to 1913) at the factory, and was known for being an alcoholic, would much rather spend his free time on a Saturday and State Holiday carousing in a local beer saloon burning off his $6 pay envelope at a nickel a pint, rather than sitting on a crate all day long twiddling his thumbs and staring at spider webs on the ceiling or watching employees come and go through the front door — after all — Leo Frank paid Jim Conley his unheard of janitorial salary the evening before on Friday, April 25, 1913 at 6:30 PM.

Concerning Jim Conley’s unheard of Salary: It left many people asking, why is the lazy negro floor sweeper named Jim Conley who was demoted from Elevator Operator, making 50% more ($6.05 vs $4.05) than the white day laborers. Perhaps the floor sweeper Jim Conley was more than meets the eyes for Leo Frank, sustaining all the testimony which confirmed Jim Conley was Leo Frank’s watchdog after-all, when Leo would order call-in prostitutes from Nina Formby on Saturdays or arrange trysts with his potentially willing child laborers who were living on the edge of poverty. Given that one female employee reported at the Leo M. Frank trial that she told Assistant Superintendent Herbert George Schiff (Trial Testimony of Herbert George Schiff, Brief of Evidence, August, 1913) that Jim Conley was “sprinkling” (peeing) on the pencils. Why was Jim Conley never fired? Unless that is Jim Conley served a more important purpose for Leo M. Frank.

Schiff would claim at the trial that the reason why Jim Conley wasn’t fired was because he knows the business too well (BOE, 1913).

According to, “Snow Ball” (Gordon Bailey, Brief of Evidence, August, 1913), Jim Conley, was an employee not always required to punch the time clock. Why would a Negro sweeper like Jim Conley who got busted down to the lowest job in the factory, be extended such unique liberties by Leo M. Frank. Especially in the wider context, why was Jim Conley the only person out of the 170 factory employees — the super vast majority of whom were White and 8 of which were African-Americans — not have to punch the time clock? Unless Jim Conley was more than meets the eye for Leo M. Frank. Was Jim Conley indeed Leo Frank’s “pet” and watchdog as alleged?

Broad Daylight: The defense and Leo Frank partisans contend, Jim Conley was waiting in the lobby, there to rob a fellow employee, namely Mary Phagan between Noon and 12:15pm on April 26, 1913, But they forgot about the Scream!

The Scream

Where Jim Conley sat on the first floor, it was no more than 30 to 40 feet away from Leo Frank in his inner office on the second floor. As we already know the first floor lobby of the National Pencil Company was the highest traffic point in the entire building, it was where people would come and go, all day long during the work week, and all morning long on Saturdays. Sound also traveled very easily in the factor and through the creaky wood floor boards which were not insulated.

On Saturday, April 26, 1913, people were coming to collect their pay envelopes and several employees were present in the morning for a half-days work wrapping things up and tying up lose ends. Leo Frank was on the second floor in his office on April 26, 1913, as he was on most Saturdays, he surely could have heard a potential scream from 30 to 40 feet away, which was how far Leo’s second floor office was from the first floor lobby area, that is if Mary Phagan was actually assaulted at the first floor lobby.

Jim Conley claimed he heard a scream after Leo and Mary went to the metal room. Leo Frank did not mention a scream coming from under his office where Jim Conley Sat, because Leo Frank claimed to have unconsciously gone to the metal-room’s toilet at trial, contradicting his earlier claim that at the exact same time (he told police) he was alone with Mary Phagan in his second floor office. Were scream experiments conducted by the police at the factory during the murder investigation? Yes.

If Jim Conley had attacked Mary Phagan in the lobby, then Leo Frank would have heard a scream downstairs below him, and he could easily call the police, the phone was inside Leo Frank’s office on the wall (See Defense Exhibit Diagrams of Second Floor).

The defense’s theory of Negro Jim Conley beating, robbing and “possibly raping” a White girl in the place where Monteen Stover would have walked in on him doing it, would almost surely guarantee her backing up into the street filled with White men, a castration without anesthesia would ensue, which is how Negro rapists were generally dealt with in 1913 Atlanta, that is, just before they were lynched from tree or riddled with bullets.

Monteen Stover, and Lemmie Quinn indicated they never heard or saw Mary Phagan coming or going on April 26, 1913, when they both claimed they came to the factory at around the same time she came. Moreover, Lemmie Quinn’s claim that he came to the factory and visited Leo Frank’s office at 12:20 to 12:25 was determined to be a lie by Coroner Paul Donehoo at the coroner’s inquest in May 1913. (see State’s Exhibit S, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913).

Does the mainline of Jim Conley’s story stand up?

Was Jim Conley telling the truth when he said Leo Frank asked him on the evening of Friday, April 25, 1913, to come to work on the morning of April 26, 1913, to act as a watchdog as he had in the past, because it was something Leo M. Frank had done many times before on Saturdays, according to Jim, and that naturally given its implications, Leo Frank denied it. In Judeo-Christian conservative society of early 20th century Atlanta, what other man would not deny he was arranging booty-calls at work with women other than his wife? Which brings us back full circle to the question, why was Jim Conley sitting on a crate all morning long in the factory lobby on his day off if Leo Frank had not asked him to be present?

Jim Conley sitting on a crate next to the stairs was corroborated by Mrs. White at the trial in 1913, and later by Alonzo Mann in 1982, but not by Mann in 1913, thus it tends to potentially corroborate the notion that Leo Frank requested Jim Conley to come to work on Saturday, April 26, 1913, to act as a lookout while Leo Frank “chatted” with girls upstairs in the afternoon. This is not an unreasonable conclusion given other child laborers’ testimony delivered about Leo Frank’s character for lasciviousness being bad.

Commonsense tells us that usually no one goes to work on a state holiday or day off – BLACK OR WHITE – unless they were asked to do so. So the question is, who asked Jim Conley to spend the day waiting and sitting on a box on the first floor lobby area of the National Pencil Company? If someone didn’t ask him, what was he doing there all day? Waiting to rob someone at high noon? While the streets are filled with White men just steps away? Jim Conley says Leo Frank did ask him, and numerous witnesses other than Alonzo Mann sustained the fact Jim Conley was actually sitting there all morning long. Eye witnesses had seen him sitting there all day long, would he have been foolish enough to rob, rape and murder an employee there when he could be identified?

Alonzo Mann corroborated that fact in 1982 saying he saw Jim Conley sitting there all morning long in the factory lobby.

Alonzo Mann, never mentioned seeing Tillander, Corrie or Emma, thus sustaining the fact he left the Factory at 11:30 am on April 26, 1913, not his supposed noon he claimed 69 years later. Another interesting element at the trial is Hattie Hall, Leo’s Stenographer, she did not mention seeing Alonzo Mann when she left at Noon, also sustaining that Alonzo Mann did actually likely leave the factory at 11:30 a.m. on Saturday, April 26, 1913, not at noon.

So if Alonzo Mann left the NPCo factory on Saturday, April 26, 1913, at 11:30 AM, as he claimed in 1913, Mann was probably lying in 1982, when he said he left the factory at Noon and came back 5 minutes later at 12:05 pm and saw Jim Conley carrying an unconscious Mary Phagan, but not seeing Monteen Stover.

We must come back to the most salient question never asked or answered in 100 years: Was Schiff even expected to be at work that day? Probably not, why would someone who prided themselves on never missing a single day of work, coincidentally miss work on the day of the murder?

To further muddy the waters, isn’t it rather odd, the employee Herbert G. Schiff who prided himself at the trial concerning the fact he never missed a day of work for 5 years (except for the flood of 1912), would have supposedly missed work on Saturday, April 26, 1913, a state holiday, when he was not expected to come to work? (see: Trial testimony of Herbert G. Schiff, Brief of Evidence, August, 1913). Alonzo Mann claimed he called Herbert Schiff one time on the morning of Saturday, April 26, 1913, but Schiffs maid, Emma Beard, alleged Alonzo Mann had called 2x. Did he even call at all? What caused the mix up? The cacophony was even bigger than described here, others claimed to have called Herbert George Schiff at different times, but as 21st century forensic time travellers of the imagination, we can presume Schiff was not expected to come to work that day. This fact leads us to believe Leo Frank’s case and his defenders were caught in their own web of confusing lies.

It turns out schiff was indeed called during the morning of April 26, 1913, but not to report to work, he was called to inform him his suit had arrived from the drycleaners.

How Alonzo Mann’s Story Falls Apart Even Further

Alonzo Mann, claimed he came back to the factory at 12:05p.m. because he wanted to speak to Herbert George Schiff, but if Schiff was never expected to be at work that day, as we can logically conclude, and in fact never showed up, it gives greater strength to the likelihood that Alonzo Mann probably lied repeatedly in 1982 through 1985 about coming back to speak with Schiff and seeing Conley. Every aspect of Mann’s story doesn’t pass the common sense test.

Lemmie Quinn, Metalroom Foreman at the National Pencil Company

The other problem Leo Frank had to contend with was the issue of Lemmie Quinn, who allegedly came to the factory at 12:20 p.m. on April 26, 1913, for supposedly 2 minutes, looking for Herbert George Schiff, it turns out to talk about a baseball bet with him. Why was Lemmie Quinn looking for an employee at 12:20 PM on Saturday, April 26, 1913, who was never supposed to come to work on a holiday?

Leo Frank said he had forgotten for a full week to mention Lemmie Quinn’s afternoon arrival at the factory at 12:20 pm and the Coroner Paul Donehoo at the Coroner’s Inquest asked why he didn’t mention this important information to the police once he remembered it a week later. Leo Frank responded by saying he wanted to ask for permission from his lawyers first before revealing it to police, the Coroner Paul Donehoo became incredulous as might be expected.

It was presumed with commonsense that someone accused of murdering a little girl, would make every effort to bring forward exonerating evidence and alibi witnesses as soon as humanly possible and not withhold it for more than a week until May 5th and May 8th, 1913. The result of Leo Frank waiting more than a week to tell anyone, made the newfangled evidence appear as if it was manufactured. Especially in light of the fact that an affidavit was made by Lemmie Quinn a week before the Coroner’s inquest, stating he had left the factory at 11:45 a.m. to go home and then head to a billiards hall on the other side of town.

Lemmie Quinn’s “reappearance” at the factory at 12:20 PM on April 26, 1913, was seen as a physical impossibility given that Lemmie admitted leaving the National Pencil Company at 11:45 AM, going home and then making a 25 minute trip to the billiards hall on the other side of town. Thus it would not have given Lemmie Quinn enough time to get back to the factory at 12:20 pm on Saturday, April 26, 1913, even if Lemmie Quinn only played one quick billiard game and then made the 25 minute trip back to the factory, he still would not have been able to get back to the factory at 12:20 or 12:25 p.m.

Lemmie Quinn Backfired

Lemmie Quinn got caught in a bald face lie and it was likely that none of the 12 Jury members and Judge Leonard Strickland Roan believed Lemmie Quinn. National Pencil Company foreman of the metal room, Lemmie Quinn, gave testimony that simply came off as completely fabricated after the murder when he testified at the Coroner’s Inquest, on behalf of Leo Frank as an alibi witness, for the purpose of shrinking the amount of time available for Leo Frank to kill Mary Phagan from Noon through 12:30, down to the range of Noon to 12:19 pm. Even if we were to believe Lemmie Quinn’s newfangled claims, it still left Leo Frank with some 18 minutes unaccounted for time according to Jewish activist historian Leonard Dinnerstein, especially in light of the fact Leo Frank changed the time Mary Phagan came into his office four times his credibility is most questionable.

Lemmie Quinn’s Claims Boxed in Leo Frank

The problem with Lemmie Quinn’s supposed appearance at the factory at 12:20 PM is NOT only that our highly refined bullshit detectors tell us that his arrival was likely a fabrication to help Leo Frank, but more importantly by Leo Frank claiming Lemmie Quinn arrived at 12:20 PM, it transformed into another blunder for Leo Frank at his trial, because it makes the Defense’s first floor attack of Mary Phagan even more difficult to believe.

If Alonzo Mann allegedly saw Jim Conley carrying the unconscious body of Mary Phagan there in the lobby at 12:05 pm, the Jury would be asking itself, well where was Monteen Stover if State’s Exhibit B is correct concerning when Mary Phagan arrived?

If Leo Frank changed the time Phagan came to his office  to 12:12 to 12:17 at the trial, and spoke to Phagan for 2 or 3 minutes, why didn’t she bump into Lemmie Quinn upon her exiting and him arriving at the factory? Both Stover (reliably) and Quinn (unreliably) claimed to be at the factory sandwiching the time segments Leo Frank said Mary Phagan arrived, so wouldn’t have Quinn bumped into at least Mary Phagan or Jim Conley at 12:20?

Leo Frank’s Ever Changing Times Concerning Mary Phagan’s Arrival Finally Becomes Significant concerning Alonzo Mann and Lemmie Quinn

The Saturday April 26, 1913, 12:20 pm appearance of Lemmie Quinn was not the only Lie Leo Frank got himself tangled in, but to make matters worse, he changed the time Mary Phagan arrived on April 26, 1913, from:

  1. “12:02 to 12:03” (This was time he gave police orally on Sunday, April 27, 1913); to
  2. “12:05 to 12:10, maybe 12:07” (The time he gave in a deposition to police on Monday, April 28, 1913 known as State’s Exhibit B, 1913); then it became
  3. 12:10 to 12:15 (The time he gave at Coroner’s Inquest, May 5 and 8th, 1913); and finally
  4. 12:12 p.m. to 12:17 p.m. (Leo Frank Trial, August 18, 1913).

FOUR SEPARATE TIMES!

Leo Frank gave four separate times Mary Phagan had arrived at his office, on four different occasions, damaging his credibility beyond repair, and to make matters worse, they were all in the time period he could not account for, even with Lemmie Quinn’s perjury, boxing him in at 12:20 p.m.

The defense theory that Jim Conley attacked Mary Phagan opens up more unanswered questions:

Where was Leo Frank, if and when, Mary Phagan Screamed? Did she scream or was she assaulted and kept quiet?

Why was there no forensic or physical evidence the attack happened on the first floor lobby area of the National Pencil Company? Until W.D. McWorth planted evidence against Conley there in the lobby 3 weeks after the crime? Who is Detective McWorth? He was a Pinkerton Agent that switched sides and became an asset to the Leo Frank Defense Team.

We are again left with asking the question: If Mary Phagan was attacked on the first floor, made “unconscious” and dumped 14 feet to the hard dirt floor of the basement, why did none of the doctors who autopsied her not find broken bones or appropriate bruises from the 14 foot fall?

We know looking back on the case with 21st century forensic eyes that 107lbs of dead weight falling 14 feet is absolutely going to leave unmistakable medical and forensic evidence. That unmistakable evidence, was not reported by doctors who performed numerous autopsies on Mary Phagan! Therefore no 14 foot fall of Mary Phagan likely occurred.

We can conclude that Alonzo Mann’s testimony was wishful thinking at best, as Steve Oney once put it.

 

 

AFTER 69 YEARS OF SILENCE, LYNCHING VICTIM IS CLEARED
reported by WENDELL RAWLS Jr., Special to the New York Times. New York Times. (Late
Edition (east Coast)). New York, N.Y.:Mar 8, 1982. p. A.12

Subjects: MURDERS AND ATTEMPTED MURDERS, SENTENCES, (CRIMINAL), VIOLENCE, JEWS
Locations: ATLANTA (GA)

People: Frank, Leo, Phagan, Mary, Conley, Jim, Mann, Young Alonzo

Author(s): WENDELL RAWLS Jr., Special to the New York Times

Dateline: NASHVILLE, March 7

Publication title: New York Times. (Late Edition (East Coast)). New York,
N.Y.: Mar 8, 1982. pg. A.12
Source type: Newspaper

ISSN: 03624331
ProQuest document 946649181

Text Word Count 1318

Document URL: http://proquest.umi.com/
pqdweb?did=946649181&Fmt=3&clientId=4273&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Abstract (Document Summary)

”Many times I wanted to get it out of my heart,” the white-haired Mr. [Young Alonzo Mann] said
in an interview last night. ”I’m glad I’ve told it all. I’ve been living with it for a long time.
I feel a certain amount of freedom now. I just hope it does some good.”

”I know I don’t have a long time to live,” he said. ”All I have said is the
truth. When my time comes, I hope that God understands me better for telling
it. That’s what matters most.”

”Thousands of times I’ve gone to bed at night with all this on my mind,” he said Saturday.
”I hope you folks tell the whole world what I saw and that [Leo Frank] was innocent.”

Full Text (1318 words): Copyright New York Times Company Mar 8, 1982

“New but long-held secret information was disclosed today in one of the most
disputed trials in American history, the murder conviction and subsequent mob
lynching of Leo Frank almost 70 years ago.

Mr. Frank, a 29-year-old Jewish factory superintendent, was convicted in
Atlanta of killing one of his employees, Mary Phagan, 14, and dumping her in
the basement of the pencil factory where they worked.

But in a sworn statement to the newspaper The Tennessean, an 83-year-old
Virginian who, seven decades ago, was a frightened and reluctant teen-age
witness in that trial, now says that he saw the real killer bear-hugging the
long-haired girl at her waist and carrying her limp, unconscious body to a
partly opened trap door leading to the basement on the day she was murdered.

”Leo Frank did not kill Mary Phagan,” Alonzo Mann insisted in confirmation of
a widely believed theory of historians. Says Janitor Was Murderer

”She was murdered instead by Jim Conley,” he asserted, referring to a factory
janitor who was the chief witness against Mr. Frank. Mr. Mann was 14 years old
at the time of the murder and was working as Mr. Frank’s office boy for $8 a
week. He said the janitor, startled by the boy, threatened to kill him if he
ever mentioned what he had seen that day.

Young Alonzo Mann was called to testify at the trial, but was asked only a few
perfunctory questions. On the advice of his mother, he volunteered no
information and told no one in authority what he had seen that Saturday, April
26, 1913. He said he continued to heed that advice for several years, except
for an occasional confidence to relatives and a rebuffed attempt to tell an
Atlanta newspaper reporter 30 years ago.

In later years, he said, he would have agreed, even been eager to talk with
those who have written some 50 books about events surrounding the infamous
trial. None of the authors ever approached him, he said.

But when confronted by two Tennessean reporters, Jerry Thompson and Robert
Sherborne, who were acting on a tip, he related his story and supplied them
with notes, photographs and other materials. He submitted to a lie-detector
test and a psychological stress evaluation and passed both impressively, The
Tennessean said. The newspaper reported that a two-month investigation
satisfied it of the historical accuracy of his information and the validity of his claims.

”Many times I wanted to get it out of my heart,” the white-haired Mr. Mann
said in an interview last night. ”I’m glad I’ve told it all. I’ve been living
with it for a long time. I feel a certain amount of freedom now. I just hope it
does some good.”

His lips trembled, but his clear blue eyes belied his frail physique and
failing heart that pumps with the aid of a surgically implanted pacemaker. He
now lives in Bristol, Va., where he said he is fond of his friends and his church.

”I know I don’t have a long time to live,” he said. ”All I have said is the
truth. When my time comes, I hope that God understands me better for telling
it. That’s what matters most.”

But he is reluctant to tell it again. ”I have laid that burden down and I
don’t ever want to pick it up again,” he said. According to Mr. Mann’s
account: He was working with Mr. Frank in the office that Saturday morning. He
had encountered Mr. Conley early that day when the burly black janitor asked to
borrow a dime for beer. Mr. Mann, who is white, did not lend him the money.

He worked until about 11:30 A.M., when he left the National Pencil Company
factory to meet his mother to watch the Confederate Memorial Day parade. His
mother did not show up, and he returned to work. Startled by Sight

He stepped into the first floor vestibule and walked toward the stairs to the
second floor. But a movement in the shadows caught his attention. He was
riveted by the scene before him: Jim Conley standing beside a trap door clutching
the wilted body of a young white girl. Her head lolled on the man’s right shoulder.
She seemed either dead or unconscious. He saw no blood, no wounds, no rope.

The janitor looked over his left shoulder at the boy and their eyes locked.
They faced each other for a few moments before the man spoke. ”If you ever
mention this, I’ll kill you,” he said.

The frightened youngster fled back to the front door and ran outside. On
arriving home, he told his mother what he had seen and recalled her saying:
”For God’s sake, don’t tell anybody else about this. You just stay out of it.”

Early the next morning, a night watchman found Mary Phagan’s bruised body lying
face down in a pile of wood shavings in the basement. A ligature was around her
neck, having scorched her throat. Blood had flowed from a deep cut in her
scalp. There were signs of a struggle to escape. Her underclothing was ripped,
but there was no evidence that she had been raped.

While Mr. Mann was out, she had come to the factory to pick up her pay, $1.20
for 10 hours work. Neither her purse nor her $1.20 was ever found.

The janitor accused Mr. Frank of the killing and said the defendant had paid
him $200 to carry the body to the basement and burn it in the furnace.

Although nothing in Mr. Frank’s history indicated wrongdoing, no other evidence
supported the janitor, and the prosecution acknowledged that Mr. Conley had told
several other versions of his story, the community and the jury were quick to convict Mr. Frank.

A wave of anti-Semitism was washing over Georgia and mobs swarmed the
courthouse daily, screaming, ”Kill the Jew.” A local newspaper defamed Mr.
Frank as ”a Jew Sodomite.”

Mr. Frank was sentenced to hang. He appealed his case unsuccessfully for two
years before Gov. John Slaton commuted the sentence to life in prison days
before his term expired in 1915.

The commutation produced a furor of protest. Armed mobs roamed streets forcing
Jewish businessmen to board up windows and doors. A mob of several thousand
people armed with guns, hatchets and dynamite surrounded the Governor’s mansion
until they were dispersed by state militiamen.

Within days of the commutation, 75 men calling themselves Knights of Mary
Phagan met at the girl’s grave in Marietta, Ga., north of Atlanta, and vowed to
avenge her death. They armed themselves and stormed a prison farm where Mr.
Frank was being held 175 miles to the southeast in Milledgeville, and where he
had survived a throat slashing by an inmate a month earlier.

The mob handcuffed Mr. Frank and transported him back to Marietta and hanged
him from a oak tree a stone’s throw from Miss Phagan’s birthplace.

In the aftermath of terror, about half the 3,000 Jews in Georgia left the
state. Those who remained hid behind locked doors, forced to survive a
widespread boycott of Jewish businesses.

The Frank trial marked the rebirth of a moribund Ku Klux Klan movement that
grew out of the Knights of Mary Phagan, and it also gave rise to the formation
of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

Recently Mr. Mann went back to Georgia and visited the grave of Mary Phagan and
mused about the possibility that he could have saved her life, as well as Mr.
Frank’s, if he had shouted out that Saturday in 1913. But he said he often had
harbored such thoughts.

”Thousands of times I’ve gone to bed at night with all this on my mind,” he said Saturday.
”I hope you folks tell the whole world what I saw and that Leo Frank was innocent.”

[Illustration]: photo of Alonzo Mann visiting grave of Mary Phagan photo of Leo Frank

 

1980’s – One Failed Pardon and One Successful Pardon without Exoneration

Second Analysis Repetitive: Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann – March 7, and November, 1982.

A new suspicious and perhaps criminal chapter was unfurled for the public, 69 years after the criminal escapades of the Leo Frank legal defense team. The Nashville Tennessean published a special breaking news report about a story in which Alonzo Mann, Leo Franks former office boy of three weeks in 1913, said he saw janitor Jim Conley carrying Mary Phagans body to the basement of the National Pencil Company in Atlanta, where Mr. Frank was the superintendent. Mr. Mann asserted that Conley killed Mary and Frank was innocent. 1982, About seven decades after the murder of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Leo M. Frank, Alonzo Mann the former office boy of Leo M. Frank came forward in an other doctored up media expose pushing the Jewish Defense position at the behest of the Jewish Community. Now nearly 83 years old, the senile and ailing Alonzo Mann came forward to say he had seen Conley carrying Mary Phagans body on the first floor. Alonzo Mann produced an affidavit seven decades after the Leo M. Frank trial concluded, thus giving the Frankites more odious support for their position. However, because of the Frank Defense’s history of obtaining falsified affidavits through criminal means, the affidavit was not taken seriously by anyone familiar with the case.

Alonzo Mann brought absolutely nothing new to the Leo M. Frank Case with his new testimony, because Jim (James) Conley had admitted to being an accomplice and that he participated in bringing the dead body of Mary Phagan to the basement at Leo M. Frank’s request.

Alonzo Mann: Dead Man’s Affidavit

However, the ADL of B’nai B’rith, American Jewish Committee, Atlanta Jewish Federation and numerous other Jewish organizations re-used the affidavit of Alonzo Mann after he died to push for a Posthumous Pardon with Exoneration for Leo M. Frank.

First Pardon Failed

Attorneys for three Jewish organizations petitioned the State (Georgia) Board of Pardons and Paroles to pardon Leo Frank, but the petition was denied on December 22, 1983.

Posthumous pardon for Leo Frank without real exoneration was achieved March 11, 1986:

Pyrrhic Victory for the Jewish Community resulted after successful pressure from the ADL of B’nai B’rith, Jewish individuals and other Jewish Organizations on March 11, 1986. Jewish pressure groups and individuals were able to coax the Georgia Board of Paroles to pardon Leo M. Frank, but they would not exonerate him of the crime. It was an odd appeasement.

Jewish Power and Political Correctness Prevailed

On March 11, 1986, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles granted Frank a pardon, citing the state’s failure to protect him or prosecute his killers, though they stopped short of exonerating Leo M. Frank of the murder of Mary Phagan. It was ultimately another victory for the prosecution team, as well as the Judge and Jury who presided over the case. Leo Frank’s murder conviction is still today as black letter and settled law, with permanent and binding legal precedent. Even after decades of relentless criminal activity and behind the scenes wheeling and dealing by the Jewish community at large, ultimately the 1913 Leo Frank Trial Judge and Jury have the last word, as do the vigilante lynchers who were never prosecuted and hanged Leo Frank for his crime on August 17, 1915.

Spun Pardon and Pyrrhic Victory

The Jewish Community saw the Pardon at face value as vindication of Leo Frank, but it was really a Pyrrhic victory. First, because in order to pardon someone of a crime, the person has to be guilty, you can’t pardon someone unless you first acknowledge they are guilty first. Therefore the guilt of the individual has to be affirmed and in Leo Frank’s case it was indisputable after every level of the appellate system preserved his verdict of guilt.

So when the Prison Board between 1982 and 1986 basically acknowledged the veracity and truth that Leo M. Frank was guilty, they also refused to exonerate him of his guilt, though they forgave him of the Murder of Mary Phagan, because the state failed to protect Leo M. Frank and because his lynching prevented him from further appeals – there is only one problem with that…

Further appeals at any level of the United States Court System?

The prison board has a clear and full understanding of the law, and yet they made a bald face lie. They were patently in error concerning the lynching of Leo Frank preventing him from any further appeals within the appellate court system, because Leo M. Frank had fully and totally exhausted all of his court appeal options at every level of the State, District and Federal Appellate Courts, with the Supreme Court unanimously overruling any further review of the case, thus closing the door forever at all levels of the appellate court system. When there were no more options left in the court system, the prison board at the time refused a recommendation of clemency and even the bribed Governor John M. Slaton, refused to pardon Leo Frank and actually stated in his commutation letter he was NOT disturbing the guilty verdict given to Leo Frank by the Jury – sustaining the appellate courts and jury. Not a single legal body in the last 100 years has overturned the guilty verdict of Leo Frank, but attempts to spin the truth have endlessly been made by countless Jews.

The Prison Board Affirmed Leo Frank’s Guilt By Proxy

The board affirmed Leo M. Frank’s guilt and quelled the powerful and wealthy Jewish Community, that has for a century been vociferously screeching Leo M. Frank was a “noble and innocent Jew, Framed, railroaded and scapegoated in a vast Anti-Jewish conspiracy”. The last word on the Leo Frank case from the judicial system came in 1986 preserving his guilt forever, period end of story and case closed… or is it?

 

Last updated: April 26, 2013.

Fair Usage Law

March 11, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Leo Frank, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC  Comments Closed

Jewish Ritual Murder

The Bloody Truth about Jewish Ritual Murder

A Review of the Ritual Murder of St. Andrei Youschinsky by Menachem Mendel Beilis, and Other Grisly Crimes

“A post-mortem examination revealed upon his body 47 wounds, all having evidently been inflicted with an awl or chisel-like instrument and with every indication of system, in order to draw the greatest amount of blood,” noted the report by the US Consulate John Grant, describing the findings of doctors during the trial of [Menachem] Mendel Beilis. Beilis had been arrested for murdering the child Andrei Youschinsky. Continuing, Grant wrote, “The wounds were mostly grouped around the head and neck … while two entering the heart had evidently been given to quickly cause death.”[1]

A picture of Andrei’s head taken after the grisly crime, with the blood washed away by police

It was the crime of the century—a crime so great that it sent shock waves not only across Russia, where it occurred, but the world itself. It began on March 25, 1911, when the young Gentile Andrei went missing in Kiev, which was a part of the Russian empire at the time. Several days later, Andrei’s parents’ worst fears were realized: His bloodied corpse was discovered in a dark cave.

The Cave where Youshchinsky’s Corpse Was Discovered

Police investigators examined the corpse at the scene and noticed some strange facts: Despite the child being found dead in the cave, there was little blood there, certainly not explaining the child’s near total blood loss. The child’s shirt appeared to have been pulled up while being stabbed, with the blood pouring out somewhere else, helping to explain why there hadn’t been more blood on the shirt than there was. The wounds were in a bizarre pattern, not just in one area, but focused in three primary areas: The forehead, the back, and around the heart, with a few wounds scattered around the neck and some even under the armpit.

Youshchinsky’s Bloodied Shirt

Other disturbing facts began to appear. Despite no cloths around Andrei, the coroner noticed that Andrei’s mouth had been wrapped with cloth so tight that his teeth left imprints on the inside of his lips. Also, it appeared that his limbs had been securely tied down too, with imprints of ropes left on his arms and legs. Some of the wounds on Andrei’s forehead appeared to have a methodical placement, as if the awl was held in place right on the temple in certain places then extreme force was applied to puncture his skull, explaining why some puncture marks seemed more pronounced and deeper than others.

The General Placement of Youschinsky’s Wounds (as shown in Monniot’s book)

Investigators looking further into this matter noticed that the boy had been dragged to the cave. Looking at the bent and broken brush around the area, while finding occasional drops of blood on the ground and on a nearby recently broken fence, the police discovered that the boy had dragged from a nearby brick factory, which was owned by a Jew, managed by a Jewish man (Beilis), and employed only Jewish workers.

The Jewish Zaitsev Factory

Police quickly interviewed the boy’s playmates. It was discovered that Andrei had been playing with (Zhenya) Eugene Cheberiak, his sisters Valentina and Ludmilla, and another child, Kaliujny. The children told police that they had been playing with Andrei near the Jewish factory when some Jews came running after them. They said that one Jew, who had a beard and black hat, caught Andrei and took him away, while Eugene and Kaliujny ran off, frightened by the ordeal.

The Cheberiaks’ Home

More strange and disturbing facts became evident to investigators as they continued their search for the truth: Inside the factory, there was a secret synagogue. Investigators were planning to look at one area of the facility; and, the day before they planned to examine the area, it mysteriously caught fire and burnt down. After interviewing local townspeople, it was discovered that many ultra-orthodox Jews of the Lubavitcher sect—the kind who all have beards, wear black hats, and have long, curly sideburns—had recently congregated at the factory for unknown reasons. Beilis was arrested, believed to have been involved in the crime. Eyewitnesses Eugene, Valentina, Ludmilla, and Kaliujny identified Beilis as Andrei’s abductor, with Eugene having stayed longer in hiding than the others.

Jews of the world suddenly united to free Beilis. The newspapers owned by Jews all clamored how he must be innocent, and that the case was nothing but mere anti-Semitism. They said because he was Jewish, he could not have committed a crime. A defense team that would have made OJ Simpson envious was created, with the finest Jewish attorneys in Russia hired. It has been estimated that in today’s dollars, the equivalent of at least $115 million was raised for Beilis’s defense.

A Picture of Menachem Mendel Beilis, Center, Surrounded by Five of His Lawyers

The Procurator of the Supreme Appellate Court of Kiev, the rough equivalent of the prosecuting attorney, Chaplinsky, noted that the case was being solved:

“[W]e cannot avoid coming to the conclusion that Mendel Beilis took part in the commission of the murder. . . . Under such circumstances, all the references to Mendel Beilis contained in the testimonies . . . of witnesses, including the less substantial, acquire the significance of serious evidence against him.”[2]

The facts certainly posed a problem to the Jewish defense team that was organized. It seemed like there was strong evidence against him. It seemed certain that Beilis was involved in the murder, and he was one of a gang of fanatical Jewish cutthroats who were going to be found guilty of slaughtering young Andrei Youshchinsky. The case was becoming well known throughout the world. People from all over were looking at this monstrous crime perpetrated by Jews. It was terrible publicity for Jews; for non-Jews from all lands would soon realize that a small band of fanatical Hasidic Jews were, once again, being accused of murdering non-Jews for sacrificial blood rites. Certainly, the Jewish defense team needed to take decisive action to hide some nefarious activities. With the fanatical crime in the press, various authors began to write about how similar crimes, committed by Jews, had occurred in the past.

Indeed, Jewish ritual murder was not something new, which had just been discovered, but is something that has been occurring since written history. There are many celebrated cases, such as Simon of Trent, who was made a Saint by the Catholic Church and whose case has been written about in detail in several issues of La Civilta Cattolica. In fact, there are about a dozen children who were made saints by the church. Additionally, there have been countless other children across the world in every land where Jews exist who were found to have been victims of these barbaric Jewish ritualistic rites, and whose crimes have been recorded by various authors over the course of the past 2,000 years.

An old picture of St. Simon of Trent, demonstrating how he was similarly bound and poked with awls. Note the hammer, which was probably used for detailed piercings.

The Relation of Jews to Blood by V.V. Rozanov

Russian poet V.V. Rozanov wrote about the case in his book, “The Relation of Jews to Blood,” and described the Jewish occult-meanings of the puncture marks that Andrei received. Rozanov argued that the Hebrew letter Schin, which looks similar to the English letter “W” and produces the “sch”-sound, was essentially put on Andrei’s head. The reported significance of this letter is that it differentiates the words “Jesus” (Jehoschuah) and “God” (Jehovah) in Hebrew—that is to say, if the letter schin is removed from the word “Jesus” in Hebrew, it then spells “God.”

First, Rozanov showed the Hebrew word Jehoschuah (or Jesus):

Removing the “schin” symbol, the word Jehovah (or God) is thus created:

Here is the Hebrew symbol “schin” by itself – the difference between the two words

Here is the magnification of some of the markings on Andrei’s head, seemingly created with precision by the awl-like device that was used, helping to explain their larger-size:

If you connect the lines in a logical manner, it illustrates how the Jews reportedly symbolized the letter “schin” on Andrei’s head:

Indeed, Rozanov’s book described the entire meaning of the puncture marks on young Andrei, describing the Jewish mystical rites that were involved.

An illustration from Rozanov’s book, used to explain the Jewish mysticism involved in their ritualistic murder rites, reportedly obtained from rare Jewish books dealing with these matters

Many Jews were concerned about this darker side of their history, with all the mysticism and rituals along with it, being discovered by the general public. Certainly, some Jews, particularly the Jews who had donated millions of dollars for Beilis’s defense, wanted the trial – and all information associated with it – to just disappear. Beilis’s lawyers needed to develop a plan, lest these crimes throughout the ages be exposed to the general public.

It appears that an idea was hatched. It was a dastardly idea, but what seems to be the atypical three-part ploy that usually accompanies a Jewish Ritual Murder that is uncovered: Get rid of the evidence against the Jews; accuse a non-Jew; and, of course, use the media to convince the public.

Lord Rothschild himself even got into the fray. He sent off a letter to Cardinal Merry Del Val of the Roman Catholic church, beginning it with cries of innocence: “Probably Your Excellency is not unaware that in the city of Kiev in the Russian Empire, some ill disposed people have recently renewed the atrocious ritual murder libel against Israelites.” He asked for the Cardinal to verify the authenticity of a letter by Fr. Ganganelli, who later became Pope Clement XIV. While the Cardinal did verify the authenticity of the letter, he in no way attributed the meaning to the letter that Rothschild conveyed. (The letter simply said that Jews should not be punished for ritually murdering Christians without first having been tried for such accusations in court.)[3]

An early picture of the Rothschild banking cartel/family

Due to the discord raised mostly by the Jewish press in England and in America, the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs said, “With regret, we must take cognizance of a new encroachment upon our internal affairs on part of the English people, instigated by the Jews.”[4] Indeed, Y. Bakhmeteff, the Russian Ambassador stationed in the United States, commented on the situation:

“The Jewish press in the United States is watching the Beilis case with concentrated attention and, naturally, completely distorts all the news which comes from Russian sources. Though not regarding this fact as very serious, I would nevertheless consider to throw light on the court proceeding from our point of view, in the American press.”[5]

Strange things began to occur to the case. People started dying. Professor Obolonsky, who was scheduled to testify at the trial, suddenly died. Had Obolonsky been the only one to die, perhaps things would not have looked so unusual. However, more evidence and people started to disappear. The incredible events that took place between the murder of Youshchinsky in 1911 and the trial in 1913 seems so incredible that all people of the world should scream in harmony about the reported miscarriage of justice that was perpetrated.

The Jewish defense decided to blame Vera Cheberiak for young Andrei Youshchinsky’s death. Some Jews even offered her the equivalent of several million dollars today if she would say she was guilty, and provide her free defense, which she obviously refused. The Jews probably chose her because Vera’s son was the last one playing with Andrei. The Jews could not develop a greater ploy. Vera Cheberiak was a mere housewife. Her husband was a postal clerk. Neither had criminal records. This was a problem. But as with all problems, there are solutions. Her brother had been in trouble with the law for theft. Sometimes, he would visit her and bring a friend with him. It was to be guilt by association. The Jews said that she was a vicious “leader of thieves.”[6] Innocent Vera Cheberiak, housewife without a criminal record, was now portrayed as an iniquitous mastermind behind a den of thieves, who purportedly regularly attended her flat.

The proceedings against Beilis were started. Eugene Cheberiak was scheduled to testify against Beilis. He had been with his good friend Andrei Youshchinsky on the fateful day that Andrei was abducted and later murdered in cold blood. Eugene’s sisters, Valentina and Ludmilla, were also there when Andrei was abducted and were to testify. Another witness, Kazimir Shakhovsky, who was a lamplighter and who had been told by the children what had occurred, also offered to testify to recent events he had seen. The truth was going to come out. The Jews knew this. They also knew something had to be done about this problem.

Ivan Kozachenko, a secret agent for the investigators, had been strategically placed inside the cell of Mendel Beilis, with the operation being so clandestine that not even the jailers or police knew of this initially. Apparently, while in jail with Beilis, Beilis told Secret Agent Kozachenko to poison “some lamp lighter” (Shakhovsky) and another witness, nicknamed “The Frog” (probably referring to the small size of the child Eugene and his slippery nature in which the child managed escape, as he too had been grabbed but broke free). In an attempt to extract more information, Kozachenko said, “I told Beilis that I would agree to do it.” Kozachenko continued:

“Mendel Beilis said it was impossible to bribe ‘The Frog’ and ‘the lantern-lighter,’ so I was to settle them with the aid of strychnine. . . . Mendel told me that there was a hospital on the estate of Zaitzeff’s factory, where someone would get some strychnine to give it to me. Beilis said that I would be given three or four hundred rubles for my expenses in executing this commission; and that if I succeeded in my mission, I would be given so much money that it would suffice for the rest of my life. This money would be given by the entire Jewish nation.”[7]

Beilis in prison, surrounded by guards

Secret Agent Kozachenko, proceeding with his ruse of merely being a criminal in jail, reported Beilis’s comments to the local police (also showing a note that Beilis wrote his wife, saying that she should give Kozachenko whatever money he needs to execute the plan), and had an interview with Lieut.-Col. Ivanoff. Unknown to Kozachenko, Ivanoff was an investigator who was attempting to discredit any evidence that proved Beilis’s guilt. Ivanoff did this for financial gain, for it was later discovered that he was being paid by the newspaper Kievlianin for his disinformation.[8]

On August 11, 1911, just a mere five days after the proceedings began against Beilis, Secret Agent Kozachenko’s findings proved to be true: Eugene Cheberiak died. But not only did Eugene die; his little sister, Valentina, died as well, who was to testify about Beilis as well. [9] Many Russian newspapers, undaunted over the deaths of the children, spoke what they felt was the truth about the incident. One newspaper reported:

“Eugene Cheberiak, the playmate of Andrei Youshchinsky, was poisoned and died in Kiev. . . . The elimination of important witnesses is the usual means employed by this bloodthirsty race [of Jews]. . . . Now there is a new victim in Kiev. The daughter of Cheberiak was poisoned. It is evident that the Jews decided to kill all those who might say a single word about the kidnapping of Andrei Youshchinsky by Beilis. . . Another most important witness has disappeared who could have given testimony in the case of Youshchinsky harmful to the interests of the Jews.”[10]

The Roman Catholic press reported in La Civilta Cattolica what happened next:

“[T]wo of the children who were eye-witnesses, Eugene and Valentina, Cheberiak’s children, had died a few days after Beilis’s imprisonment. There was a murmuring about poisoning, but the Jewish press resolutely denied: The children had been brought to the hospital where Dr. Cantor, a Jew, and Dr. Wissokowitch, a Jew, had verified it was just a matter of dysentery, as bacilli of it were found. But a little bit later – that is to say, after Cheberiak had refused to take upon herself the responsibility of the murder, and after she had made the deposition before the examining magistrate about the attempt at bribing subordination with an offering of 40,000 rubles – the newspapers themselves changed their opinion; and, with their usual impudence, they maintained that the bacteriological test had never been made, and that it could perfectly well be that the children had been poisoned … by their mother!”[11]

Indeed, Krasovsky, the Supervisor of the Kiev Police who reportedly had close relations with the synagogue, accused Vera Cheberiak—the innocent mother who had undergone the mental anguish of seeing her own children dying after agreeing to testify—of poisoning her own children.

Krasovsky, who was paid handsomely by Jews for his disinformation attempts

Vera could not fathom how she could be blamed for killing not only young Andrei Youshchinsky but her two children as well. When the Czar came to town, she sent him her “most humble” petition. She noted her “irreproachable life of toil.” She said, “I want to express before the throne the grief of a mother . . . when she . . . loses two of her children. . . .” She humbly requested that the Czar consider “the sufferings of the mother” and asked that he find the killers of her children.[12] Zamyslovsky, a leader of the Imperial Duma, honestly stated during trial that there was not “the slightest evidence against Cheberiak as the person who poisoned her children.”[13] Similarly, during court, the State Procurator Vipper, promulgated:

“We have heard here Mr. Krasovsky himself spread insinuations that Vera Cheberiak poisoned her own children—she, who was so grieved when her son and daughter died and who undoubtedly loved her children very much. . . . The attempt has been made to throw the entire guilt upon Cheberiak. . . .”[14]

Prosecutor O. Vipper

Polistshuk, who was a witness to Beilis’s guilt and who been an agent of the Secret Police, declared that Krasovsky was actually responsible for the children’s deaths by poisoning them, which was noted at the trial.[15] In fact, both Cheberiak’s family and Polistshuk had witnessed and testified that young Eugene and Valentina Cheberiak ate a piece of cake given to them by Krasovsky before they died.[16] Indeed, why would he come to Cheberiak’s flat with cake-in-hand? Not too surprisingly, since Krasovsky was the supervisor of the Kiev Police, his Police Department issued a response that favored him to Petersburg. Also not surprisingly, Lieut.-Col. Ivanoff, who was on the Jewish payroll, was involved in the writing of this letter.

Indeed, Ivanoff was getting paid-off with much money from the Jewish-owned newspaper Kievlianin for supplying quasi-facts, which promoted the belief that Cheberiak was a ruthless murderer and the notorious leader of a den of thieves in its articles. As a result of his lies, Ivanoff was then involved in a trial where the Kievlianin was sued for libel, based on Ivanoff’s disinformation, and found guilty as charged.[17] It was also shown that Ivanoff “lied” at the trial by deliberately making up false testimony of Kozachenko to make Kozachenko’s testimony appear circumspect. Accordingly, Ivanoff was “charged” with “dishonesty in the open court room.”[18]

Apparently, Shakhovsky, the lamp lighter who had witnessed young Andrei near Beilis shortly before Andrei’s murder, and his fears of being “stabbed” or murdered by other means were not mere paranoia. He obviously heard of the children being killed, and must have known that he had little chance if the band of cutthroats would murder even children witnesses. Then again, what would one expect from a group of people who stabs a child 47 times with an awl and drains his blood? That must have scared Shakhovsky a bit. He changed his statement. Now, he stated that he did not actually see Beilis abduct the Youshchinsky child; he stated that Eugene Cheberiak, who had since died, told him that he saw a man, who was wearing Jewish attire and who resembled Beilis, grab Andrei, and the Jew dragged Andrei towards the brick factory. His wife also dropped her testimony, probably out of the fear of being just another murder statistic in this case. She said that she was under the influence of alcohol when she made her statements.[19]

The slanderous campaign against Cheberiak continued. Cheberiak was referred to by a Jewish writer as a “keeper of the den of murderers.”[20] Since the Jewish defense team was unsuccessful in framing her for the death of her own children and Andrei, they tried to blame her children’s murder on her brother, Peter Singayevsky, and his friends. The Jewish defense team figured that this would be easier, since Singayevsky and his friends had been arrested before for theft, while Vera’s record was clean. Inventing names to make these common thieves sound more sinister, the Jewish investigator Fenenko, working in conjunction with Ivanoff, referred to two of Vera Cheberiak’s brother’s friends as “Vanka the Red Haired” (Ivan Latysheff) and “Kolka the Sailor” (Nicholas Mandzelevsky).[21]

Latysheff supposedly committed suicide while Fenenko was questioning him. It is said that Latysheff just got up and bolted for the fourth story window and decided to jump out.[22] However, this story about Latysheff committing suicide just does not make any sense. Why would he kill himself at that point? Now, the Jewish defense team could bash Latysheff as much as they wanted, suggesting that he somehow was responsible for the macabre incident surrounding the innocent child Youshchinsky; and Latysheff could not defend his honor (nor retaliate with libel and slander suits).[23] They had found their scapegoat.

Two of the star witnesses mysteriously vanished off the face of the Russian map at the time of the trial. Secret Agent Kozachenko and the criminal Kulinich, both of whom had told investigators of Beilis’s confessions while in jail with him, just disappeared into thin air. The prosecutor “was not able” to find either of them. Prosecutor Vipper remarked that Kulinich was needed to “confirm the fact that the accused [Beilis], being confined in the prison together with the witness, confessed to him that he had participated in Youshchinsky’s murder.”[24] It is not known if they ever turned up; if they did turn up, it may have been in a grave, perhaps suffering the same fate as so many others who planned to testify against Beilis. Or, maybe, they decided to take some money and live the leisure life. In any case, their testimony, which was needed, was nowhere to be found.

Despite all the mysterious deaths and disappearances surrounding Vera Cheberiak—the deaths of her two children, Eugene and Valentina; the murder of her child’s friend, Andrei Youshchinsky; the supposed suicide of her brother’s friend, Latysheff; the untimely death of an investigating professor, Professor Obolonsky; the disappearance of two witnesses who had heard Beilis confess his guilt, Secret Agent Kozachenko and the criminal Kulinich, who were planning to testify—the good Vera Cheberiak, undaunted by the tragic events surrounding this murder, continued forward and testified at the trial. She told the defense that her son Eugene had personally seen Beilis grab the innocent child Youshchinsky and took him away, and that Eugene had told her this.[25] Such bravery in the face of adversity must be admired. This is, perhaps, why Prosecutor Chaplinsky referred to her as “an innocent Orthodox Christian woman.”[26] Her daughter Ludmilla also testified, undeterred by her brother and sister’s deaths.

Ludmilla Cheberiak testified:

“The manager of the [brick] factory, Mendel [Beilis], began chasing us, just as some other Jews there pursued us. We started to run away…. We started to get away. However, he [Beilis] caught Eugene and Andrei, but Eugene struggled and escaped, while Andrei could not escape. The Jews then dragged Andrei away. My sister [Valentina] did not know about a hole [in the fence] where she could escape, so she hid where they could not see her and watched. I ran to the house where we lived, but then noticed my sister was not there. I ran back for my sister and took her hand and led her home. She cried on the way home and said: ‘Andrei was dragged somewhere. But I do not know—I have not seen [where he was dragged] …'”[27]

The Jewish defense team sought to use every bit of subterfuge it could create. They used every means at their disposal to make it appear as if the whole purpose of the trial was to frame an innocent Jew when nothing could be further from the truth. Even from the very beginning, and knowing how things would progress, Prosecutor Vipper honestly stated how Jews would react to Beilis being indicted:

“From the first moment when Beilis was indicted, Jewish circles became excited. They did not expect that the government . . . would dare to accuse the Jews. I repeat: They did not expect this. . . .

“The Jews are so sure of having in their hands the main lever of social life, the press, that they think nobody would dare to raise such an accusation against them, not only in Russia but also in other nations. . . . They control our world . . . and we feel ourselves under their yoke. . . . I personally consider myself under the power of the Jews; under the power of Jewish thought; under the power of the Jewish press. . . . The Russian press only seems to be Russian. . . .

“To speak against Jews means to evoke a charge that you are either a Black Hundred, an obscurantist, or a reactionary, or that you do not believe in progress, and so on. Nobody thought that the government would ever try this case. Everyone wondered whether the government would not be taking a risk. . . . We will be accused even of having staged the trial, of wishing to incite the people against the Jews. . . .

There was, therefore, great astonishment on the part of the Jews when Beilis was indicted: How could the government dare to do such a thing when there is an Imperial Duma, in which various discussions will be started and a number of government officials may be held responsible for this? The government, however, dared. And Beilis was indicted.”[28]

When Rev. Dr. Justin Pranaitis testified, the Jewish defense made up all kinds of lies to discredit him. He testified to ritual murders having occurred in the past, and explained the hatred contained towards Gentiles in the Jewish oral laws, known as the Talmud. In order to hide the facts, they made it appear as if all the Popes condemned Jewish ritual murder accusations, while nothing could be further from the truth, particularly considering all the child-saints such as St. Simon of Trent, who had died a similar death.[29] The Jewish defense team tried to ridicule him with a play on words to make it appear as if he was unfamiliar with the Talmud, asking him, “Kto Baba Kama?” (“Who is Grandmother Kama?”) The defense lawyers were referring to one of the books of the Talmud, named Baba Kama, but presented the question in such a manner (rather than asking him, “What is Baba Kama?”) as to obviously confuse him, as “Baba” is “grandmother” in Russian and is also part of the word used for the chapter of the Talmud (though not bearing a similar meaning), with all the Jews laughing about his initial response to their trick-question in an effort to ridicule his expertise.

John Grant, the U.S. Consulate stationed in Odessa, Russia, who was quoted at the beginning of this article concerning the nature of Andrei’s wounds, summed up what had occurred:

“It is a matter of record that those witnesses who had stated that they saw Beilis catch the boy have since died. The evidence was not complete, consisting, in part, as follows: That there were secret proceedings carried on at the brick factory; that well-known fanatical leaders of Jews from places in Russia and abroad had secretly resided there about the time of the murder; that in a very short time all those who died who had professed knowledge of the case likely to be injurious to the cause of the Jewish side, two children who were supposed to have been with the boy when he was caught by his murderers; that before the examining magistrate sent out from St. Petersburg could possibly inspect the dwelling of Beilis it was consumed by fire, the cause still remaining a mystery; that from the very beginning of the investigation, Jews and their close friends endeavored to direct the search to some false trail; that the whole and numerous Jewish press had heaped ridicule and ignominy upon all who did not readily accept the theory of innocence of Beilis and of his fanatical friends, both known and undiscovered; [and] that the Jewish press attacked with the greatest acumen all persons who conducted the case against Beilis and endeavored to gain credence for Detectives Mishchuk and Krasovsky.

“On October 28/10 November, after the trial had lasted a month, the jury gave its verdict ‘that a certain boy found cruelly murdered in Kiev had been killed by fanatical Jews and that Jews, for occult purposes, had carefully drawn all blood from the dying child; that it was an instance of Jewish ritualistic murder; that Beilis was not guilty.'”[30]

Indeed, Beilis was found innocent. While 6 of the jurors found him guilty, 6 also believed that he was innocent, with a simple majority being necessary for a conviction. Or, perhaps, some of the jurors were offered—and took—bribes, given the bribe that was offered to Cheberiak and all the other crimes that were committed to free Beilis. In any case, while the jurors felt that the case was indeed a Jewish ritual murder, there remained some division as to proving that Beilis himself was the actual culprit who murdered the child, even if he was somehow involved in the process.

No article can ever do the trial justice. And, unfortunately, all the books in English about the trial are written by Jews, who appear quite ingenious with the way that they presented (or omitted) many of the key facts. When you take them together, however, one of the greatest tragedies in the 20th century occurred, with some fanatical Jews getting away with murder.

Zamyslovsky, the prosecuting attorney in the case and member of the Russian Duma, wrote a massive 520-page book about the ordeal, published prior to the Russian Revolution in 1917. It was titled Ubistvo Andrushee Youschinskago (The Murder of Andrei Youshchinsky). In it, he reportedly tries to change “the public opinion of the world” to show it that the Czarist government was not as bad as some Jews portrayed it to be. Zamyslovsky promulgated:

“The fanatical murder committed by the Jews in order to obtain Christian blood is not a legend even in the twentieth century. It is not blood libel; it is a terrible reality. Many who doubted and hesitated about it became convinced after the Kiev trial. However, the historical and social significance of the Beilis affair is far from having been exhausted by these discoveries of the bloody rite and dogma that were repeatedly described aloud in public, in the name of the state prosecutor, at the trial in Kiev. . . . The Beilis case is a vivid and indelible page from that book of the world’s history, which contends that Jewry immediately opens war against the Christian state system everywhere as soon as it has succeeded in strengthening itself, and it does not shrink from using any means at its disposal.[31]

Just about everyone associated with the trial who testified for the prosecution – who didn’t die during the trial – was murdered after the Russia revolution. Dr. Arnold Leese, writing in his book about Jewish Ritual Murder, notes what occurred:

“After the Jewish Bolshevik revolution, the Jew-controlled Cheka shot the Judge [Boldirev], the Public Prosecutor and many of the witnesses, including Father Pranaitis, the medical expert Kozoratov, and Professor Sikorski.

“Professor Pawlow, a Jew, who was a witness for the defense, became a leading scientist in Bolshevik Russia!

“The ex-General Alexandre Netchvoldov of the Russian Imperial Army, tells us the rest in an article, “La Russie et les Juifs” in Le Front Unique, published at Oran, 1927, p. 59: Quoting Evrijskaja Tribuna of 24th August, 1922, he says ‘that at a visit of the Rabbi of Moscow to Lenin [Ulyanov], the first word Lenin said to his visitor was to ask him if the Jews were satisfied with the Soviet tribunal which had annulled the Beilis verdict, saying that Youschinksy had been killed by a Christian!'”

In the online English-Hebrew translation of Menachem Mendel Beilis’s book “The Story of My Sufferings,” it also gives a picture of the aftermath, noted by the translator in the chapter Editor’s Postnotes:

“After the Revolution of 1917, the Provisional Russian Government immediately set about the task of prosecuting former Czarist ministers for crimes against the Russian people. The Beilis case was the first case submitted for investigation. In the summer of 1919, although the archives of the Czar had not yet been researched and the commission was only allowed to investigate illegal acts done in an official capacity, the Moscow Revolutionary Tribunal convicted Minister of Justice Shtchedlovitoff, Ministers of the Interior Makaroff and Maklakoff and Director of Police Bielezky. They were all executed. Zamislovsky and Shmakoff died in the interim. Prosecutor Viper had died awaiting trial following his indictment in 1919. Vera Cheberiak was shot in Kiev in 1918.”

As noted above, the bogus re-trial of the Beilis case was the first case after the Russian revolution. It should also be pointed out that the revolution occurred immediately after Zamyslovsky’s book was published. It is quite possible that if Zamyslovsky’s book been published and allowed to run its course, perhaps Russia would have had a fighting chance to recognize the hatred with which the Russian people would face. (It has been estimated that between 40-60 million Russians were either slaughtered or starved after the Bolshevik revolution.) All known copies of Zamyslovsky’s 520-page book were destroyed except for one, and the remaining copy was marked “Classified” until the 1990s. Even then, only scholars were allowed to view it. I had paid a doctor there to copy and digitize it, and have since put it online in its original (Russian) format.

V.V. Rozanov, who is still a respected poet in Russia, was also killed. His book, “The Relation of Jews to Blood,” had nearly all copies having been rounded up and destroyed. (My copy is actually a reprint, published in 1934 Stockholm.)

In the work of Vladimir Lenin (aka Ulyanov), “Critical Marks of the National Question,” V. 20, p. 19, published in 1913, he writes about this case in a footnote:

“The Beilis case — a provocative trial engineered by the tsarist government in 1913 in Kiev. Beilis, a Jew, was falsely accused of having murdered a Christian boy named Yushchinsky for ritual purposes (actually, the murder was organized by the Black Hundreds). The aim of this frame-up was to fan anti-Semitism and incite pogroms so as to divert the masses from the mounting revolutionary movement. The trial excited great public feeling. Workers’ protest demonstrations were held in a number of cities. Beilis was acquitted.”

The Russian Holy Synod began collecting donations for a monument to be dedicated to the young Andrei Youshchinsky, who was “cruelly killed by the Jews.”[32]

Today, the child has finally become a saint, recognized by some members of the Russian Orthodox Church, and there has recently been a new 800-page book published about the case in Kiev, Ukraine, which tells the truth about the case.

And, of course, there is the Jewish Ritual Murder video sold here, which has a separate short section dealing with the case.

* * * * *

[1] Letter from John H. Grant, U.S. Consulate stationed in Odessa, Russia, to the U.S. Secretary of State, “Ritualistic Murder at Kiev” (Nov. 13, 1913), 840.1

[2] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 77.

[3] La Civilta Cattolica (April 11, 1914, p. 210), “Jewish Trickery and Papal Documents–Apropos of a Recent Trial, Part I”; also see, La Civilta Cattolica (April 25, 1914, p. 344), “Jewish Trickery and Papal Documents–Apropos of a Recent Trial, Part II”

[4] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 159.

[5] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 160. Bakhmeteff later sent a message to Minister of Foreign Affairs in which he honestly said that American Jews “have not failed to take advantage of an opportunity and have used the Kiev case to foment a new agitation against Russia. . . .” This was done to elicit “sympathy” for the “oppressed Jews.” He went on to describe that Jewish Congressman Adolph Sabath of Chicago sought to condemn Russia for the Jews. Bakhmeteff then went on to describe “the falsity of the newspaper articles maliciously stating that we accuse the whole of Jewry of the commission of ritual murders.” He noticed that “public opinion” was being “misled” by “false information derived from evil-minded agitators.” Ibid., pp. 160-161.

[6] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 89. Since Cheberiak had no criminal records, this problem also was remedied. While she was not a thief, her brother, Peter Singayevsky, was. He had given her some of his of his stolen goods. She sold these items, because she did not need them, and was promptly arrested. She was also convicted of forgery during the time between Youshchinsky’s murder and the trial. Ibid., p. 121.

[7] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 101.

[8] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 106-107.

[9] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 86-87.

[10] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 87.

[11] La Civilta Cattolica (April 25, 1914, p. 344), “Jewish Trickery and Papal Documents–Apropos of a Recent Trial, Part II”

[12] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 89.

[13] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 91. Cheberiak eventually took the people who were bad-mouthing her to court for libel. She sought libel charges against Tarnavsky, the newspaper Kievskaia Mysl’s editor; the journalist Brazul-Brushkovsky; and Trifinoff, the assistant editor of the newspaper Kievlianin. Ibid., p. 142.

[14] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 90-91.

[15] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 90.

[16] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 92.

[17] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 106-107.

[18] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 109. Eventually, when the facts became known of how Krasovsky was hindering the investigation (although it was never proven that the children died as a result of the cake that Krasovsky had given them), Krasovsky was removed from police in 1912. He quickly obtained a job for the Jewish journalist Brazul-Brushkovsky. This is the same gentleman who was also paying Ivanoff for information to discredit the investigation and make Beiliss appear innocent. Krasovsky continued to investigate the matter, which was now being paid for by the newspaper. Ibid., p. 133. Director of the Police Department, Bielezky, received a telegram that gave evidence that Ivanoff had an assistant, Sergei Makhalin, who worked for the journalist Brazul-Brushkovsky and was involved in the libel for which Ivanoff was convicted. It appears that Makhalin gave more false information at the trial. Ibid., pp. 195-197.

[19] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, pp. 80-81.

[20] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 181.

[21] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 114-115.

[22] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 118.

[23] In fact, it was demonstrated that while Rudzinsky and Singayevsky, common thieves and friends of Latysheff (and the latter, Singayevsky, being Vera Cheberiak’s brother), were engaged in a burglary with Latysheff, they all thought the murder of Youshchinsky took place, because they had heard an erroneous date of when Youshchinsky was murdered at the funeral. Both Singayevsky and Rudzinsky responded to investigators that this proved their innocence and that of their friends because of their criminal activity, giving the same wrong date. Had they actually somehow been involved in the crime, they would have known the date on which it occurred and used that specific date as their alibi to demonstrate innocence. Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 116-117. Hence, their mistake shows their innocence in this matter and raises more suspicions of Latysheff’s alleged suicide, which seems more like the possibility of another murder perpetrated against a person whose innocence would have made it more evident that the head of the guilty party was, in fact, Beiliss. Indeed, Prosecutor Vipper noted that Rudzinsky, Singayevsky, and Latysheff were not guilty. “The government does not desire to conceal anything, and it would indict them if they were guilty.” Ibid., p. 185. Fenenko, an investigator who was shown to be pursuing false leads, was replaced from the case, Ibid. pp. 130, 146. Probably due to the lack of details he kept in relation to Cheberiak’s testimony, it caused some confusion on the part of investigator Shmakoff later. Ibid., p. 183. Speaking out on the behalf of Singayevsky, Rudzinsky, and Latysheff, Prosecutor Vipper queried the jury: “Does a thief, a criminal, a rascal, subject children to such barbarities? They may commit a murder, a wretched murder. . . . But they never apply such refined, bestial tortures. So, gentlemen of the jury, notwithstanding all the gossip about them, you must remember, you must bear in mind . . . that Singayevsky, Rudzinsky, and Latysheff are not guilty, that the blood of Andrei is not on their hands, and that this blood is on other hands.” Ibid., p. 185.

[24] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 131.

[25] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 139.

[26] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 182.

[27] Ubistvo Andrushee Youshchinskago (The Murder of Andrei Youschinsky), Petrograd [St. Petersburg] 1917

[28] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 180.

[29] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 209. In fact, Lord Rothschild, an incredibly wealthy English Jew who came to Beiliss’s aid, “requested confirmation of the fact that the Roman Pontiffs always denied the existence of ritual murders.” In response to this, the Cardinal commented on the ritual murder charge, saying that “the press obviously put a strained interpretation upon the documents in question.” He continued, “It is one thing to forbid a ritual murder charge against the Jews without sufficient evidence; it is another thing to deny that Christians had at any time been killed or even tortured by Jews. This the Church cannot easily deny.” Ibid., pp. 267-268. This corroborates Rev. Dr. Pranaitis’s findings that such a document never existed.

[30] Letter from John H. Grant, U.S. Consulate stationed in Odessa, Russia, to the U.S. Secretary of State, “Ritualistic Murder at Kiev” (Nov. 13, 1913), 840.1. Note, the two dates provided are due to the differences of the Julian and Gregorian calendars, as the latter was used in Russia at the time.

[31] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 225.

[32] Tager, The Decay of Czarism, p. 226.

Fair Usage Law

August 8, 2015   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Discrimination News, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Multicultural News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Download Frazier Glenn Miller’s Book “A White Man Speaks Out” While You Still Can; Miller Arrested As Person Of Interest In Kansas Shootings

Most readers undoubtedly know that 73-year-old longtime white racial activist Frazier Glenn Miller, who media outlets are also identifying as Frazier Glenn Cross, has been arrested as a person of interest in the shooting of three different people at two different Jewish centers in the Kansas City metro area on April 13th, 2014. The shooter first fatally shot a 14-year-old boy, Reat Griffin Underwood, and his grandfather, William Lewis Corporon, around 1:00 P.M. in the parking lot at the Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City campus located at 5801 W. 115th St in Overland Park, Kansas, then gunned down a woman, Terri LaManno, at the Village Shalom senior living facility at 5500 W. 123rd St, just several blocks away. The shooter, who’s believed to have been packing a shotgun, a handgun and possibly an assault weapon, reportedly shot at two other people but missed.

Police caught up with a man who matched the description of the shooter at Valley Park Elementary School near 123rd Street and Lamar Avenue, and arrested him as a person of interest at 1:28 P.M; they later identified him as Frazier Glenn Miller. They also impounded the car, a white Suzuki, and said that although there were other items in the vehicle possibly of evidential value, they would not give specifics. Miller is currently being held in the Johnson County Detention Center on premeditated first-degree murder charges. He is currently listed in Johnson County jail records as Frazier Glenn Cross, and his first court appearance is scheduled for April 14th at 1:30 P.M. Miller’s wife has been getting calls from the media and the SPLC and is reportedly distraught.

Although the media is playing the Jewish card, presumably because of Miller’s reputation, it turns out that none of the three victims are Jewish. Reat Griffin Underwood and William Lewis Corporon were members of the United Methodist Church of the Resurrection in Leawood, and Terri LaManno is a longtime member of St. Peter’s Catholic Church in Kansas City.

Censored Book, Download it and upload it to other sites before its censored:

 

Miller’s motivational book, “A White Man Speaks Out”, which chronicles his history as an activist and provides an insider’s description of the 1979 Greensboro Massacre which was originally triggered by Communists and their allies. Miller’s book is available on PDF in two separate parts; download and save to your hard drive because his website could be taken down anytime:

The original Chapters 1 through 23:

http://solargeneral.org/wp-content/uploads/library/A-White-Man-Speaks-Out.pdf

 

Fair Usage Law

May 23, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Hate Crimes, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Southern Poverty Law Center, Terrorism, White Nationalism, White Power, White Supremacism, William Luther Pierce, Zionism  Comments Closed

The One Hundredth Anniversary of the Murder of Mary Phagan, that Led to the Leo Frank’s Conviction and the Founding of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith

ENGLISH The relevance of Mary Phagan to white children today

by John de Nugent on April 26, 2013

My sheriff race makes the legal case for the murder by Leo Max Frank of Mary Ann Phagan, though now a century old, even more important now than it already has been since 1913.

jdnforsheriff-business-card

The Leo Frank case is also a way to show:

1) That white men can take action, even with a revolver and a rope, when justice is repeatedly denied them;

atlanta-constitution-frank-taken-from-prison

Wealthy, connected Jew businessman dies like the rapist, murderer, torturer (see autopsy report below!) and pedophile that he was. And it was not the “trailer park” that lynched him, but the leading citizens of Georgia, who had HAD it!

frank-lynched

 

2) the Leo Frank case shows why the infamous ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) ever began — after Frank was lynched, the Jews realized they needed a sophisticated legal and PR network  TO GET FUTURE GUILTY JEW CRIMINALS OFF! Hence organizations like SPLC and ADL, two powerful Jewish Supremacist pressure groups.

3) The behavior of Leo Frank and then of his Jewish supporters illustrates perfectly the real teachings of the vile Talmud, which overtly condones raping goy kids, and lying under oath.

Talmud (http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/TBN44U9TPBOIFI7O1):

talmud_set

“A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself [give false testimony under oath in court]; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel [the Jewish people] may not suffer.” – Schulchan Aruch, Jore Dia.

“To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if they knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.” – Libbre David 37.

“The Jews are human beings , but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts.”-Baba Mecia 114, 6 [i.e.: 114b].

“Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and commanded to serve the Jew day and night.” – Midrasch Talpioth, p225-L.

“A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated.”– Aboda Sarah 37a.

“A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.” – Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348.

“When a Jew murders a Gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty.” – Sanhedrin 57a .

Non-Jewish Children are subhumans. – Yebamoth 98a.

Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth. – Abodah Zarah 36b

.

The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is available on Amazon.

http://archive.org/details/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn1913

This is a summary of the 1989 book by Mary Phagan Kean, the grand-niece of the victim, entitled Leo Frank and the Murder of Little Mary Phagan, dealing with the murder of her great-aunt by Leo Frank, his trial and the evidence.

(One can see the almost uncanny family resemblance, especially if little Mary Ann had grown up to middle age.)

mary-phagan-kean
Keywords: Mary Phagan; Leo Frank; Pedophilia; Anti-Semitism; Jewish; Jew; Anti-Semite; Racism; Confederate; Ku Klux Klan; Lynch Mob; Kidnapping; Murder; Rape; Strangulation; Atlanta; Marrieta; Georgia; Lynched; Lynching; Death Sentence; KKK; ADL; Anti-Defamation League; Tom Watson; John M. Slaton; B’nai B’rith; Hugh Dorsey; Govenor of Georgia; Hugh Dorsey; 1913; 1914; 1915; Kevin MacDonald
Year: 2010

Notes: This book is the best attempt of all the books on the subject at creating an even-handed review of all the remaining documents on the trial and conviction of Leo Max Frank.

frank_mary_phagan_antique_300x600

Description

‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ was written by Mary Phagan Kean, born June 5, 1953. Publisher: New Horizon Press (September 15, 1989).

To download this insightful book in Adobe Acrobat PDF format, click here:

http://archive.org/download/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn1913/murder-of-little-mary-phagan-leo-frank.pdf

The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan-Kean is an exceptional biography, detailing the most infamous criminal case in the annals of early 20th century Southern legal history. What makes this book so unique is it provides an intimate view of the Frank-Phagan case from the grandniece herself of blue-eyed little Mary Anne Phagan, the victim.

Mary Ann Phagan was born on Thursday, June 1, 1899, and was raped with some unknown object, slammed against a lathe and strangled to death on Saturday, April 26, 1913 by her Jewish boss, Leo Max Frank. Frank was a pencil factory manager in Atlanta, a Cornell engineering graduate, the husband of one of the major débutantes in Jewish Atlanta, and a high official of the major Jewish organization, B’nai B’rith (in Hebrew, “Sons of the Covenant”), and the president of its Georgia branch. To this day, Jewish organizations lie that Frank was innocent and a victim of antisemitism. The most they could get to reverse the guilty verdict of history and many courtooms was to get a pardon in 1986, not an overturning of the guilty verdict. A pardon means just what it says,  “guilty but forgiven.” And forgiven only because he was lynched…. which was considered “unfair” because it prevented him from further (and futile) appeals of his life sentence.

Mary Ann Phagan, a resolute and beautiful girl who fought like a tiger when attacked by the Jew Frank

mary-phagan_color-nice-dress

This is the most even-handed book ever written about this Jewish-Gentile conflict and its contentious aftermath over the last hundred years.

frank-header-display.php

Sunday, April 27, 1913 at 3:24 a.m.

After Ol’ Newt Lee, the “negro” National Pencil Company night watchman, punched the time clock in Leo Frank’s second floor business office at 3:01 o’clock a.m., he went down to the basement for the purpose of using the racially segregated Negro toilet.

National Pencil Company, 37-41 South Forsyth Street, Atlanta, Georgia in 1913

national-pencil-company-factory-1913

The Sam Nunn Federal Building is located here today. The pencil factory closed in 1915 due to the scandal. The Jew’s team of pricey lawyers tried to frame two innocent blacks for Frank’s murder, presuming that all Southerners were easily manipulable bigots, thus insulting the jury.

satreet-map-location-today-national-pencil

When Lee completed his business and went to check the back door of the cellar service ramp, something out of the ordinary appeared faintly in the darkness. As he held his smoky lantern closer, it appeared to be a dead child, who had been horribly mauled.

mary-phagan-autopsy-photo-1913

From the autopsy: (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913, Archive.org) by F. H., Harris, MD., performed Monday, May 5, 1913, and testified under oath at the Leo Frank murder trial on Friday, August 1, 1913.

I made an examination of the privates of Mary Phagan. I found no spermatozoa. On the walls of the vagina there was evidences of violence of some kind. The epithelium was pulled loose, completely detached in places, blood vessels were dilated immediately beneath the surface and a great deal of hemorrhage in the surrounding tissues. The dilation of the blood vessels indicated to me that the injury had been made in the vagina some little time before death. Perhaps ten to fifteen minutes. It had occurred before death by reason of the fact that these blood vessels were dilated. Inflammation had set in and it takes an appreciable length of time for the process of inflammatory change to begin. There was evidence of violence in the neighborhood of the hymen.

[WARNING: GRIM DETAIL ………………………. It appears, and this is extremely unpleasant, that the fiend penetrated her dry vagina with his finger (or some other smooth object such as a broomstick, which left no splinters) to cause trauma and pain. The fact that there was “a great deal of hemorrhage” strongly indicates she was alive when this happened and had been knocked unconscious or was dazed. At death, the heart of course ceases to pump and blood pressure drops drastically, resulting in little blood flow. This supports the belief that Mary Ann fought off her attacker vigorously until her head was smashed against the lathe. Then she was further violated while alive….. :-( ]

A black and white plate of Mary Ann Phagan, colorized with her actual hair and eye color. Mary worked for hours at the eraser tip machine, which was near the lavatory. Leo Frank, who did all payroll, lied in court that he did not even know who she was. He also drank a pot of coffee every day, and as nature called frequently, he passed by her work station on his way to the lavatory. He could not have failed to notice an attractive girl he passed by several times every day for a year — and who was showing some curves even at 14 (Mary’s mother described her as well developed for her age).

mary-phagan-colorized-

In 1913, the NPC had more than 170 employees, more girls than boys according to Leo Frank (State’s Exhibit B, April 28, 1913, Archive.org). Most of the laborers at the NPCo were pre-teen and teenaged children who worked 10 hour shifts 5 days week and a half day on Saturday, toiling for mere pennies an hour.

After discovering the dead little girl, Lee rapidly climbed the ladder in the base and steps from the lobby to the second floor business office, to call his superintendent Leo Frank, but after eight minutes of trying, no one answered, so Newt called the Atlanta police.

The grisly discovery launched an investigation that began precisely at 3:24 AM on Sunday, April 27, 1913, when the graveyard shift call-officer, W.F. Anderson, was notified by a telephone from a frantic black man about the discovery. A Ford Model-T squad car filled with officers and Britt Craig was immediately dispatched. What happened next was revealed at the Leo Frank trial three months later, as first responders described in detail what occurred between 3:24 a.m. and sunrise.

At dawn, after the police had failed to reach Leo Frank by phone all night long, they finally got through to him at 7:00 am and rushed over to his residence to take him directly to the morgue to have him identify the dead body. At the Selig residence where Leo Frank resided, he denied knowing his employee Mary Phagan. After Leo Frank claimed to be unsure about the identity of the dead girl at P.J. Bloomfield’s mortuary, police officers took him to his second-floor office at the National Pencil Company in an effort to pinpoint the exact time of Phagan’s arrival.

Saturday, April 26, 1913 at 12:03 o’clock p.m.

Inside Leo Frank’s business office, he opened up his payroll ledger and told the Atlanta police that Mary Phagan had arrived at about 12:03 p.m. on Saturday, April 26, 1913, had asked for her pay and then left.

Monday, April 28, 1913 at 9:00 a.m.

The next day, Monday morning, April 28, 1913, Leo Frank would change the time of Phagan’s arrival in his office to between, “12:05 to 12:10 p.m., maybe 12:07 p.m.” (State’s Exhibit B, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913.

Tuesday, April 29th, 1913 at 11:35pm

Leo Frank was arrested on suspicion, Tuesday, April 29th at 11:35 o’clock a.m. This was his last day of freedom. Two days after Frank’s arrest, on Thursday, May 1st, 1913 Jim Conley, the black janitor at the pencil factory, was arrested. James Milton Gantt, Phagan’s friend, was released after being cleared of suspicion of murdering Mary.
An incriminating blood soaked shirt was found at Newt Lee’s home at the bottom of a barrel used for burning garbage!

Milestone in the Mary Phagan Murder Investigation

Something very interesting happened a few days later, on Saturday, May 3, one week after the murder, and it became a major breakthrough. Detectives stumbled upon one of the child employees who had once worked at the National Pencil Company (NPC). Inside the business office that Leo Frank had used for the prior five years, they discovered a young girl named Monteen Stover, who was there to collect her pay envelope for a second time. This time she was accompanied by her incensed mother, having failed a week earlier (on the day of the murder, which also happened to be Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913 at noon time) to find anyone to hand it to her get it when she arrived alone at the factory at five minutes past noon.

Monteen Stover

miss-monteen-stover-leo-frank

When Atlanta police thoroughly questioned Monteen Stover, she revealed something rather curious. Stover told them that when she arrived at the NPC exactly one week earlier and made her first attempt to get her wages, Leo Frank was not in his office — as he normally was in the past — at the normal payday time of noon. More chronologically specific, Stover said Leo Frank’s office was empty when she waited, inside it, from 12:05 p.m. to 12:10 pm based on the wall clock. And there was indeed a wall clock at the office area.  The accounting books indicated that historically Monteen Stover was indeed owed her wages at said time.

This was earth-shattering for Frank, because on Monday, April 28, two days after the crime, Leo Frank had made an unsworn deposition in the presence of his elite attorneys to a room full of Atlanta police detectives (taken down by a stenographer) in which Frank precisely stated, differing from Monteen Stover, that he was in his office, and that he was alone with Mary Phagan, between 12:05 p.m. and 12:10 p.m. (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, State’s Exhibit B). Even more significant is that Leo Frank told the police on Sunday, April 27, 1913, not only that Mary Phagan had come to his office at 12:03 p.m., but that he had not left his office until 12:45 p.m.

So why had Monteen testified she found the office empty?

Sunday, May 4, 1913, The Moment of Truth

Without Leo Frank knowing the police had discovered and questioned 14-year old Monteen Stover, Atlanta Police Detective John R. Black and Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott approached Leo Frank in his jail cell on Sunday, May 4, 1913 and asked him again if he had been in his office every minute on Saturday, April 26, 1913, from noon to 12:45 p.m. and Leo Frank responded with an affirmative “YES.” The officers then took a different angle and asked Leo Frank if he had been in his office every minute on Saturday, April 26, from noon to half past noon (that is, 12:30 p.m., a shorter period) when another visitor alleges to have arrived, and Leo Frank again responded with an affirmative “YES.” It was thus on the eighth day after the murder of Mary Phagan that the police discovered a major discrepancy in Leo Frank’s murder alibi. (“Alibi” is Latin for “somewhere else.”) Though Leo Frank, would maintain stubbornly up until his trial that he had not budged his hynie from his office between noon and 12:45 p.m., when he went upstairs to the fourth floor to inform two employees he was leaving the building for dinner (as a more formal age called a hot, formal lunch) and locking the building.

For the police, 14-year old Monteen Stover had just unintentionally caused inconsistency in the murder alibi of Leo Frank, but they would have to wait three and a half months to see how Leo Frank would account for this intriguing contradiction at his trial. That is how long Leo Frank maintained that he had never left his office (3.5 months), but then something electrifying happened!

Leo Frank Murder Trial, August 18, 1913

At his murder trial, Leo Frank had to address why Monteen said his office was empty at the exact time he claimed that he and Phagan were in there together with no Monteen. Frank suddenly changed his original murder alibi, after maintaining it for over 100 days, for the time in question between 12:05 p.m and 12:10 p.m., and in doing so he revealed who killed Mary Phagan!

Unique Trial Analysis

Mary Phagan Kean offers a uniquely neutral analysis of the month-long capital murder trial of Leo Frank, which began on July 28, and led to his August 25, 1913, murder conviction after only two hours of jury deliberation. The decision, rendered by 12 white jurors, also included a recommendation to the presiding judge that Leo Frank suffer death as his punishment. Both the conviction and sentencing recommendation of the jury were confirmed the next day by the presiding Judge, the Honorable Leonard Strickland Roan, on Tuesday morning, August 26, 1913. Judge Leonard S. Roan sentenced Leo Frank to death by hanging as prescribed by the law and recommended by the jury who voted unanimously the precise written words “NO MERCY”. The execution date was first scheduled for October 10, 1913, but appeals by Frank and his legal team set the execution date back, on and off, repeatedly for two more long painful tooth and claw years.

.

Slaton, all distinguished and icy-looking. What’s wrong with saving a pedophile who killed a kid if his buddies makes you rich?

100% of the books written by Jews about the Leo Frank case, leave out the fact that the Governor Slaton was a law partner in the firm

Rosser, Brandon, Slaton and Phillips – the law firm that represented Leo Frank during his Summer of 1913 Trial.  Slaton commuted

the sentence of his own law client!!

governor-john-slaton.

Leo Frank’s appeals ran from August 1913 to April 1915, all rejected by higher courts. The commutation by Georgia governor John M. Slaton of his death sentence on June 21, 1915 into life in prison caused instant outrage, for the case had never left public attention, and many suspected the commutation would be just the first stage before an eventual pardon “after things died down.” A mob of 1,200 angry citizens marched on the governor’s mansion, finally quelled and dispersed only by by the local militia.

The law firm of “Rosser, Brandon, Slaton and Phillips”

Rarely ever mentioned by the Jews who defend Frank is the outrageous and demonstrable fact that the governor who spared Frank the rope, John M. Slaton, was a partner in the very law firm that represented Leo Frank during his trial and appeals. The law firm was called Rosser, Brandon, Slaton & Phillips (the ‘Slaton’ was, it bears repeating, Governor John M. Slaton himself), having officially formed in July of 1913, just before the trial began.

Slaton was hung in effigy; Jews claim that the crowd yelled:

“Georgia’s traitor governor has sold out to sheeny gold.”

slaton-hung-in-effigy

The “Benedict Arnold” Governor Slaton had thus commuted the death sentence of his own client. Can one imagine the outcry today if a governor committed the same conflict of interest in a rape-murder case involving a child? Ponder it!

As for Leo Frank, he was shipped off by train the next day, on June 22, 1915, to the Milledgeville State Penitentiary, located some 170 miles from Atlanta.

Male-Bldg-GA-State-Prison-Farm-Milledgeville

The Shanking of Leo Frank

About one month later, Leo Frank was attacked in prison while sleeping and had the left side of his throat slashed at 11:00 p.m. on Saturday, July 17, 1915. The shanking was committed by a fellow inmate named William Creen. Leo Frank barely survived the attack, but was saved by two inmate doctors who were serving life sentences for murder. Milledgeville Penetentiary was a Whose Who’s Who! Details of the FRANK-CREEN assault are available online at FLICKR and Live Leak.

.leo-frank-throat-cut-newspaper

The Lynching of Leo Max Frank

On August 16, 1915, Leo Frank was abducted from prison in a military commando style raid, by some of the most prominent citizens in the State of Georgia, driven for 8 hours northwest to the edge of Marietta and lynched at sunrise on August 17, 1913. The site of Leo Frank’s lynching was former Sheriff Frey’s cotton gin (now at 1200 Roswell Road, Marietta, Georgia).

leo-frank-hanging-rare-rope-ascending

The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith

Nearly 73 years after the lynching of Leo Frank, the organized Jewish community applied political pressure and backroom dealing involving the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, individual Jews and Jewish groups, resulting in a highly political posthumous pardon without criminal exoneration for Leo Frank on Tuesday, March 11, 1986.

The sinister and megalomaniac logo of the ADL: taking a cr-p on a world wedged between its legs ;-) for 100 years, now the D of ADL has swallowed the world. D stands for Defamation.  For one hundred years they have defamed Gentiles. Read what Senator Tenney has to say about this group.

adl-logo

The Leo Frank case continues to capture the imagination of the public, now more than ever as 100 years has passed since the celebrated conviction of Leo Frank.

Brief Biography of Leo Frank (1884 to 1915)

Leo Max Frank was born in Cuero, in southern Texas (known as the “turkey capital of the world”/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuero,_Texas), on Thursday, April 17, 1884 to a local postmaster, Rudolph Frank, a Jew who had immigrated from Germany in 1869, and to Rachel Frank, a native New Yorker from Brooklyn. The Frank family moved three months after Leo’s birth back north to Brooklyn, where Leo was raised and educated in the NYC public school system. After completing high school and college prep work at the Pratt Institute High School of Brooklyn (1898 – 1902),

Screenshot of Pratt website homepage

pratt-edu-banner

Leo Frank matriculated into the Ivy League university of Cornell in Ithaca, NY. At Cornell, a strong science and engineering school,  in the fall of 1902, Leo Frank majored in mechanical engineering and became very active in several college groups.

cornell-on-river

Sage chapel at Cornell where Ezra Cornell, who founded the school in 1865, is buried.

Sage_Chapel_cornell

1905

During the summer break of 1905, between his Junior and Senior year at college, Leo Frank went with his wealthy uncle Moses Frank on a sojourn to Europe, spending the summer traveling extensively and visiting with extended family. Some of these photos have survived into the 21st century.

1906

In the fall of 1905, Leo Frank began his senior year of college. And after successfully graduating in June, 1906 with his degree in mechanical engineering, Leo Frank bounced around from one job to another, including one in Hyde Park Massachusetts, until he visited Atlanta, Georgia, in October of 1907, and met again with his rich uncle Moses Frank and a delegation of Jewish Southerners, such as Stationary Magnate, Sigmund Montag. There they discussed a potentially lucrative business venture in the manufacture of pencils.

sig-montag-owner-of-national-pencil-company

.

national-pencil-company-official-banner

.

After visiting Atlanta for two weeks, Leo Frank made the very serious life-changing decision, and decided he wanted to participate in his Uncle Moe’s manufacturing venture. To fulfill this promise, Leo Frank would again go on another sojourn overseas to Europe, this time to study with the world-renowned Eberhard-Faber in Germany. (The American branch began making pencils in NYC in 1861, where the UN building stands today.) Mary Ann Phagan ran the machine that put a small metal sleeve around the wooden pencil so an eraser could be inserted and it was Mary’s job to insert rubber erasers. It was intensely tedious 10 hour a day work, over the 13 months she worked at the NPCo.

eberhard-farber-pencil-ad

Leo Frank left NYC on November 7, 1907, ocean-bound for Northern Europe. Once Leo Frank arrived, he stationed in Bavaria and began diligently studying the pencil manufacturing process under the best German engineers. After his nine-month engineering apprenticeship was completed, Leo Frank returned to NYC on August 1, 1908 aboard the USS Amerika, and then briefly stopped at his home in Brooklyn to visit his family (Rudolph, Rachel and sister Marian) for a few days.

Built in Belfast, now “northern” Ireland, in 1905, this ocean liner warned the Titanic in vain in April 1912,  three hours before her disaster, about icebergs.

uss-amerika

On August 4, 1913, Leo Frank embarked on a southbound train from Penn Station in Manhattan with his over-sized weathered leather luggage and relocated to the capital of Georgia. He checked into the Terminal Hotel circa August 6, 1913.

The old Penn Station in New York City; it serves trains going west through Pennsylvania to Chicago and California

penn-station-nyc

Frank arrived at Terminal Station in Atlanta on August 6, 1908, starting a new life in “the Heart of the South.”

On Monday morning, August 10th, 1908, Leo Frank started work as Superintendent of the National Pencil Company, located at 37 to 41 South Forsyth Street in downtown Atlanta.

1910, Leo Frank Marries Lucille Selig

Two years later on November 30, 1910, Leo Frank married into an upper middle class German-Jewish family (Cohen-Selig), an established Southern family whose ancestors had founded the first synagogue in Atlanta two generations prior (Levi Cohen). Leo Frank was an ambitious rising star, becoming very actively involved with Jewish philanthropy and Atlanta’s upper-crust society life in the South.

Even though Frank was born in Texas, he was considered a red-blooded “Yankee” by Southern standards. Yet he assimilated quickly and was elected B’nai B’rith President of the Gate City Lodge, established in 1870 in Atlanta, in September of 1912 by the 500-member Jewish fraternal order.

And oddly enough, the convicted child-rapist-murderer was unanimously re-elected again in September of 1913, less than 1 months after his murder conviction. B’nai B’rith was so strongly united behind Leo Frank, that they founded the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith on his behalf in October of 1913. For 100 years the ADL, Jews and B’nai B’rith were proud to link themselves to the Frank case, but as of 2013, Abraham Foxman seems to be distancing his organization from the Leo Frank case, but this is not entirely certain.

By 1913, with nearly 5 years of hands-on experience in pencil manufacturing, Leo Frank had reached the pinnacle of his career, running the factory as not only general superintendent, but also part owner through the acquisition of company shares. His high rank and partial ownership enabled him to receive $100 a month as a courtesy while he was imprisoned.

The onetime Venable Hotel became the NPC; here the sinister front entrance

venable-hotel-npc-april-28-1913

1913

Born on April 8, 1908, The National Pencil Co. headquarters was located on 37 to 41 South Forsyth Street, near the corner of Hunter Street; it was there that thirteen-year-old Mary Phagan, an employee of Leo Frank, had begun working in the early spring of 1912, or about a little more than a year (13 months) before she was murdered. Mary Phagan worked 150 feet down the hall from Leo Frank’s office on the 2nd floor, where she participated in the final and finishing production stages of the pencil manufacturing process. Mary Phagan worked in the metal department, known colloquially by factory employees as the “metal room”, in a section called the tipping department adjacent to the only set of bathrooms on the entire second floor.

Using a knurling machine, Phagan’s job involved inserting rubber erasers into the paper-thin brass metal tubes that were partially attached around the ends of pencil stock. Her final paycheck for for $1.20· about $180 today for 55 hours of work ($3.27 an hour).

The ONLY Bathroom on the Second Floor was Located Inside the Metal Room (This fact is Jewish Censored)

An important detail rarely mentioned about the “metal room”, where Mary Phagan worked, contained within it, the only bathroom on the second floor – which became a critical element of the solution to her murder. Moreover, Mary Phagan’s work station was next to the bathroom door and Leo Frank would pass immediately by her everyday when he needed to use the toilet, which was likely quite often, given that Leo Frank was known for drinking copious amounts of black coffee every day.

Forensic Evidence Discovered, Monday, April 28, 1913

It was in said metal room where an unusual five-inch-wide blood stain — crowned with spatter droplets — was found on the floor adjacent to the bathroom entry way, and dark strawberry-blonde hair soaked with blood that had dried was found tangled around the solid iron handle of a lathe in the same room.

These forensic discoveries in the metal room were initially made Monday morning, at 6:35 AM, on April 28, 1913, when an early-bird employee named Robert P. Barret arrived to start the fresh work week af0ter the Confederate Memorial weekend festivities. (This holiday across the South, begin in 1866 and still celebrated in nine states today, gave rise two years later — 1868 — to the current federal Memorial Day holiday.)

Stone Mountain, Georgia outside Atlanta, commemorates Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson

stone-mountain

As Barret’s hand reached for the handle of his lathe, his fingers became entangled with dark strawberry blonde hair which had not been there when he had left his work station on Friday evening, April 25, at 6:00 o’clock p.m. The factory was shuttered by law for the weekend because of the legal holiday on Saturday.

Word of Mary Phagan’s death had already reached all of Atlanta, when a newspaper “extra” edition, published by the Atlanta Constitution at the behest of the young star reporter Britt Craig, and it was released on Sunday, April 27, 1913, just hours after the normal Sunday morning edition already appeared.

Britt Craig

britt-craig-reporter-atlanta-constitution

Once the word got out about the discovery of hair and blood forensic evidence in the metal room, word traveled like wildfire around the factory, employees erupted into emotional hysterics, flocked to the metal room, and gawked at the unusual blood stains on the floor and the hank of 6 to 8 strands of  hair suspended from the solid iron handle of the bench lathe. A number of employees immediately recognized the hair as distinctly being that of Mary Phagan and testified to that effect at the Leo Frank trial. In the Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court records (1913, 1914) there is an affidavit from Mary Phagan’s step father, Mr. Coleman, identifying the hair as being that of Mary Phagan.

John Kennedy, Irish-American like Miss Phagan, and also murdered by a Jew, Lyndon Baines Johnson, likewise had auburn hair.

john-kennedy-auburn-hair-sunlight-shot

A white powder known as haskolene — used as a machine lubricant — was found suspiciously smeared and rubbed into the fresh blood stains on the metal room floor. What was so significant about the location of the blood stains is that they were conspicuously in front of the girls’ dressing room and next to the bathroom door, adjacent to where Phagan’s workstation was located.

The powder smearing appeared to be an attempt to cover up the evidence on the floor, but the blood bled through the white powder, turning the dark red stains into variations of white, pink and red. The blood stain also had a starburst spatter pattern behind it, indicating how Phagan came into contact with the floor — hard.

Botched Crime-Scene Clean-up

The poorly conducted “clean-up job” gave the appearance of a failed attempt at obscuring the blood stains. This blood stained area of the floor was found by Jim Conley at the behest of Leo Frank, during the noon hour of April 26, 1913. Frank’s legal eagles, would try to frame the innocent Newt Lee and Jim Conley for the murder.

Little Mary Phagan’s Life (1899 – 1913):

The 55 hour work week Mary Phagan performed at the pencil factory was her small way of helping support her five siblings and widowed mother. Mrs. Phagan remarried to a cotton-mill worker named John William Coleman in 1912. Mary Phagan’s stepfather had known Mary and her family quite well for about 4 years, before marrying into the Phagan family. Mr. Coleman, the stepfather,  positively identified the hair found on the lathe machine as belonging to Mary Phagan, as did several other employees who worked in the metal room.

Temporarily Layoff

During the week before Phagan’s murder, a shortage of brass sheet metal at the factory had led to a reduction in her work hours and she was temporarily laid off by Leo Frank on Monday, April 21, 1913, until the supplies could be replenished. Phagan’s wages for the shortened work week came to just $1.20, for the 16 hours she had worked the previous Friday, April 18, (10 hours), and Saturday, April 19, (6 hours) prior to her being laid off on Monday, April 21, and then murdered on Saturday, April 26, 1913, Confederate Memorial Day, a state legal holiday.

The First 48 Hours of the Mary Phagan Murder Investigation

George Epps made statements on Monday afternoon on April 28, 1913, providing troubling information to Atlanta police, stating that Mary had told him in confidence that Leo Frank scared her, and he often made lascivious sexual innuendos and inappropriate insinuations toward her. Epps said Leo Frank was “after her” in local parlance, that Frank would stare at her strongly, wink and then smile. Phagan allegedly suggested to Epps she was growing ever more scared of her superintendent.

According to George W. Epps, Mary Phagan told him specifically that Leo Frank would sometimes run up in front of her, thus ostensibly blocking her way when she was trying to leave work, and during the work day he would pester her, get a little bit too close for comfort, touch her shoulders and stare at her lecherously and then smile.

According to the unabridged Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case file, George Epps, after the Leo Frank murder trial concluded, got kidnapped and ensnared in a witness-tampering scandal by Leo Frank’s legal defense team (Georgia Supreme Court Records, 1913, 1914, archive.org).

George W. Epps was lured to Alabama with the promise of a job and then coerced into signing a false affidavit under duress. After George Epps was freed by his kidnappers, he later signed a true affidavit, describing the intimate details, moment by moment, of his being abducted and taken all the way to Alabama. The true affidavit described in details the dishonest trickery that unraveled when Epps was forced to sign a pre-written affidavit that was filled with lies and recantations. see: Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Records on Archive.org.

In The First 24 Hours of the Mary Phagan Murder, Sunday, April 27, 1913

When the police arrived on the scene in the basement of the National Pencil Company at 3:45 p.m., they found Mary Phagan’s mangled body on the remnants of a saw dust mound diagonal to the furnace, she had been strangled with a cord and what looked like a frilly strip or part of her petticoat wrapped around her neck and soaked with blood.

When Atlanta Police scoured the basement there was evidence Phagan had been dragged by her arms face down from the basement’s elevator entry, 140 feet, before she was dumped near the cellar’s incinerator. Phagan’s face was so scratched up, punctured, and covered with filth, that at first the police were unsure of her race. They had to roll down a stocking from her knee to see for sure if she was White or not. However, Newt Lee remarked that he knew she was white because of the texture of her hair was unlike a Negress.

The autopsy would reveal Phagan had been hit on the face around the temple and right eyesocket with a left fist (Leo Frank was left handed, Jim Conley Right Handed). There was also a major gash on the back of her head with a wound “down to upward” corresponding with where here head hit the solid iron handle of the bench lathe located inside the metal room.

The knitted bloomers of Mary Phagan were torn/cut open across the vagina to the seam of the right leg, she had the appearance of having been violently raped, with blood and discharge present on her still attached underwear. Phagan’s face was beaten black-and-blue, and sunk deep into her neck was the 1/8th inch thick, 7 foot jute cord with which she had been strangled to death. The knot on the front right side of Phagan’s neck indicated a left handed man had strangled her. One of the doctors who performed an autopsy, testified under oath, to several instances of sexual violence, and internal vaginal damage, torn flesh and inflammation, suggesting some kind of rape either penile or by fingers occurred before she was garroted (strangled).

Leo M. Frank, Factory Superintendent

When the detectives arrived at Leo Frank’s in-laws home, the door was answered by Mrs. Lucille Selig Frank, the wife of Leo Frank. The police asked if they could speak with Mr. Frank and Lucy welcomed them into their home. Like typical seasoned detectives, without telling Leo Frank why they were there and what it was all about, they closely observed Frank. Suspicion initially fell on Leo Frank at first sight, because he appeared to be extremely nervous, trembling, rubbing his hands, and ghastly pale. Police intimated Leo Frank appeared to be badly hung over, while he was bumbling, and jim-jamming in an agitated state. When Leo Frank asked for a cup of coffee, one of the police officers jocosely suggested whiskey. Leo Frank then began asking questions faster than the police could answer in time, his voice sounded hoarse. Leo Frank fumbled and struggled with minor tasks like fixing his collar before leaving with the police. Moreover, Leo kept saying he hadn’t had breakfast and kept asking for a cup of coffee, even after the cops joked about whiskey, as if he was trying to delay the the process of being taken to PJ Bloomfield’s morgue and his industrial plant, where he was superintendent.

The police asked Leo Frank if he knew Mary Phagan, and Leo Frank denied knowing any Mary Phagan, saying he would need to check his accounting books to be sure. Frank then made some passing remark about not knowing the girls who worked for him.

The significance of Leo Frank claiming to not know Mary Phagan become an important circumstance further into the investigation, because it was later determined by factory records, she had worked for him more than a year on the same floor as his office (second floor). By measurement, Phagan’s workstation was literally only 3 to 4 feet away from the only bathroom set (toilets) existing on the entire second floor, the same bathroom Leo Frank visited daily during his normal 10 hour work days, as Leo Frank drank several cups of black coffee on a daily basis to keep himself going. There was conflicting testimony. Some employees testified Frank knew Mary Phagan quite well on a first name basis and never harassed her, others suggested they saw Leo behave inappropriately toward Phagan in terms of touchy feely kind: “he put both hands on her shoulders” and that other times he would harass her.

Another incriminating fact against Leo Frank’s claims of not knowing Mary Phagan, was the payroll ledgers revealed that she had collected more than 53 pay envelopes from Leo during her year of employment and during that time she logged an impressive 2,750+ hours of work on the punch-clock at the factory from specifically: the early Spring 1912, to Monday, April 21, 1913 (when she was temporarily laid off by Leo Frank, because of a shortage in metal).

Frame the Nightwatchman (“night witch”) Newt Lee

On Sunday morning at 8:26 a.m., April 27, 1913, in the presence of the Atlanta police, Leo Frank pulled out Newt Lee’s time card, eye balled it from the top downward and said it was punched correctly every half hour from the time between 6:00pm on April 26, 1913 to 3:01 am on Sunday, April 27, 1913. However, on Monday, April 28, 1913, Leo Frank changed his story and told the Atlanta Police that Newt Lee did not punch his time card at 4 disparate intervals, creating 4 hours of unaccounted for time. It put even greater suspicion on Newt Lee, because the old Negro lived less than half an hour, and the intervals suggested he had more than enough time to go home and return. See: Defendant’s Exhibit A, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913.

Intimations to Search Newt Lee’s Home

After making his Monday morning, April 28, 1913, deposition to Atlanta Police that became known as State’s Exhibit B, Leo Frank told the police to check his body for scratches and visit his in-law’s home to look at his dirty laundry. Leo Frank removed his shirt and the police found no visible scratchmarks on his body, and then accompanying the police to the Selig residence, Negress mammy Magnolia “Minola” McKnight brought the dirty laundry basket and the clothes within it, that indicated no blood stains. Given Leo Frank’s intimations about Newt Lee’s timecard, the natural thing for the Atlanta police to do next was search Newt Lee’s shack, but they were deluged with a flurry of “hot tips” that turned out to be dead ends that tied them up, until the next morning.

Tuesday, April 29, 1913

Tuesday morning, April 29, 1913, the police entered Newt Lee’s shack without a warrant (violating his constitutional rights) using a skeleton key, outside at the bottom of a garbage burn barrel, they found a suspicious looking bloody shirt. The shirt had blood stains high up on the armpits in the front, back, and inside, in such a manner the police immediately thought it was forged and planted there intentionally to incriminate the Negro. What also made detectives think the blood soaked shirt might have been fabricated is because the shirt, aside from the oddly placed blood stains, appeared clean and did not have the distinctive “Negro odor” on it as they recalled when they each took turns sniffing it on Tuesday morning, April 29, 1913.

Newt Lee’s Blood-Soaked Shirt

Three contrived elements perplexed Atlanta Police about Newt Lee’s shirt, firstly, the fact it was clean, but covered with oddly placed blood smears, and secondly, had no funky “Negro smell”. Thirdly, why was it left at the bottom of a burn barrel, but not burned? These factors taken together gave the suggestion the shirt might have been meant to incriminate Newt Lee, but why? When the police questioned Newt Lee about the shirt, he said someone gave it to him 2 years ago and he hadn’t worn it since. The Police pondered, if Newt Lee hadn’t bloodied an incriminating shirt, who planted it there? Who and why was all the evidence pointing to Newt Lee, who seemed to be innocent, because his actions that day seemed normal that he called the police upon finding the body?

At that moment, the police began thinking, perhaps someone was trying to implicate Newt Lee the nightwatch, because the “death notes” were written with his job title misspelled as “night witch” (factory employees called the nightwatchman colloquially night watch) written on them – the time card contradiction seemed odd because of four newly missed punches and then the unusual bloody shirt, all together were circumstances that began directing strong suspicion on Leo Frank, atleast in the minds of the Atlanta Police and detectives investigating the crime. The altered Newt Lee time card Leo Frank submitted (Defendant’s Exhibit A) to the police, caused them to think he was intentionally trying to pin the crime on him. At the Coroner’s Inquest one of the police officers would say that when he looked over Leo Frank’s shoulder on Sunday, April 27, 1913, that the Newt Lee timecard wasn’t missing four punches.

Leo Frank’s last full day of freedom was Monday, April 28, 1913, because on Tuesday April 29, 1913, at 11:30PM, Leo Frank was arrested and would remain incarcerated until his lynching, two years later, at 1200 Roswell Rd in Marietta.

The Negro Janitor James “Jim” Conley

After arresting the factory sweeper Jim Conley on Thursday, May 1, 1913, and questioning him, it took 2.5 weeks of interrogation to get from him the revelation that he was indeed present at the factory on Confederate Memorial Day during the afternoon.

The Atlanta police “swetted” Jim Conley using the 3rd degree method (good cop / bad cop) and after weeks of initial failure and 3 half-truth affidavits, Atlanta’s finest finally got Conley to admit he was an accessory after the fact to the crime. More importantly, the police finally got the details out of Conley about how the body was discovered in front of the metal department’s bathroom and transported to the basement. They also were able to get an eye witness account of what Leo Frank was plotting on the afternoon of April 26, 1913. And it was an ugly anti-Black racist plot the racist B’nai B’rith President Leo Frank had formulated to play against the jury it was intended for, 12 White Southern men. Leo Frank’s deliciously racist plot fell apart very early into the months long investigation into the Mary Phagan murder.

What Happened According to Jim Conley

Jim Conley admitted he was asked by Leo Frank to move the dead body of Mary Phagan to the basement and “ghost write” dictated “death notes” as if they were written by Mary Phagan, while she was in the middle of being raped. It was necessary they be written in Negro hand writing, to draw suspicion to another Negro, who was intended to be the Nightwatchman Newt Lee. The plot was Ivy League brilliant, because even if it failed, it put two Negroes between Leo Frank and Mary Phagan, first, Newt Lee and second, Jim Conley.

The Oddity of the Mary Phagan Murder Notes

The murder notes were a very contrived attempt to make it appear as if an ignorant semi-literate Negro was trying to charade the notion that Mary Phagan had written the “death notes” after she went to the bathroom in the metal room, was pushed down a hole and then sexually assaulted by Newt Lee in the basement. The “death notes” where unmistakably clear in their attempt to pin the crime and point suspicion on the “long tall slim Negro” night watchman Newt Lee (“night witch”), because the notes physically described Newt Lee, precisely, and including his job title colloquially ‘Night Watch’ ebonicized as ‘Night Witch’.

In 2013, Looking back from the 21st century to 1913, the “death notes” cause many people to ask themselves rhetorically, when or ever in history of American history has a Blackman committed battery, rape, robbery, strangulation and mutilation of a White girl, and then stuck around to write some pseudo-literature as if they were being written by the victim herself in the middle of the rape and addressing the notes to their mother, describing what happened from the perspective of the victim and blaming another negro who wouldn’t be in the building for another 4 hours?

“I write while he plays”… but the notes were unbelievable from the start, because Police thought never in history has someone written notes while they were in the midst of being raped.

Something very interesting happened June 3rd, 1913, the Selig-Frank mammy Magnolia “Minola” McKnight made an earth shattering affidavit to Atlanta police and Hugh Dorsey.

Minola in the presence of her lawyer stated the police, in heresay language that Leo’s wife, Lucille Selig Frank, was very upset the morning after the murder, because Leo Frank was drinking heavily, made Lucille sleep on the floor, and Leo asked Lucille to get his pistol so he could shoot himself, and that Leo said he didn’t know why he would murder. (See State’s Exhbit J)

The Trial of Leo M. Frank (July 28, 1913, to August 26, 1913)

Hired by the National Pencil Company, Pinkerton Detective, Harry Scott, contradicted Leo Frank about the answer he had given to Mary Phagan, after she asked the question about her work. There was some conflicting testimony about what Leo Frank said concerning a question Mary Phagan asked him (Mr. Leo Frank) at 12:02 pm or 12:03 PM on April 26, 1913.

On Monday, April 28, 1913, Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott was told by Leo Frank that Mary Phagan asked him “Has the metal come in?”. Scott told the jury, Leo Frank said to him that he told Phagan: “I Don’t Know” — it created three dimensional time and space of Leo and Mary walking together toward the metal room for the purpose of “finding out”,  as the brass was normally kept in the metal-room’s closet.

The Leo Frank trial would make history, because it would be the first time in the South, the testimony of two Negroes (James “Jim Connolly” Conley & Newton “Newt” Lee) would provide evidence in part, leading to the conviction and death sentence of a Whiteman by an all White jury, in the White racially consciousness, Separatist and segregated Old South (a place where Jews were respected, highly regarded and treated as equals to Whites).

Frank’s mother frosts the jury and courtroom public

As even this Jewish whitewash article about Saint Leo the Harmless admits (http://gaslight.mtroyal.ca/penclfct.htm):

Leo’s case was hurt still further, if that were possible, when his mother leaped to her feet in court and cried out to Mr. Dorsey [the prosecuting district attorney]: “You Christian dog!” This was printed in the pamphlets which, in verse and prose, assailed Frank and all Jews, and which were hawked among the crowds outside the courtroom.

The REAL Star Witness Emerges: Monteen Stover

However, the real star witness at the Leo Frank Trial it turns out was not only Jim Conley, but a 14-Year-old & 5’2? tall White girl named Monteen Stover.

Star Witness Monteen Stover and the (THIRD) Leo Frank Admission Amounting to a Murder Confession

Monteen Stover who liked Leo Frank and defended his character at the trial, had inadvertently put Leo Frank’s murder alibi into dispute.

Leo Frank swore to his lawyers, the Coroner (on May 5th and 8th), police, and detectives, for 3.5 months, that he had never left his office on April 26, 1913, from twelve noon to 12:45pm, but Monteen Stover had arrived at the factory to collect her pay envelope just minutes after Phagan arrived, but she did not bump into Mary Phagan walking down the stairs and Leo Frank was not in his office, nor was Leo Frank aware that Monteen Stover had arrived and waited for him inside his second floor office for five minutes between 12:05 pm to 12:10 pm.

How Leo Frank solved the Mary Phagan Case for the Jury.

The jury naturally would ask themselves, if Monteen Stover was telling the truth, how come Monteen Stover neither coming or going from the factory didn’t bump into Mary Phagan between 12:04pm and 12:11pm, as it took about 1 minute (46 seconds to be exact) to reach Leo Frank’s second floor office from the front door of the factory lobby. Leo Frank would change his alibi-story about never leaving his office and respond to the testimony of Monteen Stover stating, he might have “unconsciously” gone to the only bathroom in the metalroom during that exact time!

Brand New Admission on the Witness Stand: Leo Frank Gave the Solution to the Mary Phagan Murder Mystery on Monday Afternoon, August 18, 1913 at 2:46 pm

Now gentlemen [of the Jury], to the best of my recollection from the time the whistle blew for twelve o’clock [noon on Saturday, April 26, 1913] until after a quarter to one [12:46 p.m.] when I went up stairs and spoke to Arthur White and Harry Denham [at the rear of the fourth floor], to the best of my recollection, I did not stir out of the inner office [at the front of the second floor]; but it is possible that in order to answer a call of nature or to urinate I may have gone to the toilet [in the metal room at the rear of the second floor]. Those are things that a man does unconsciously and cannot tell how many times nor when he does it (Leo Frank Trial Statement, August 18, Brief of Evidence, 1913, 2:15pm to 6pm).

Crescendo of the Leo Frank Murder Trial: State’s Exhibit A and Defendant’s Exhibit 61

Leo Frank ineluctably entrapped himself beyond escape, because the only bathroom on the second floor was located within the metal room, it was the metal room where the murder forensic evidence was found (bloody hair and bloodstains) and the prosecution had successfully built a month long case that Leo Frank had murdered Mary Phagan on April 26, 1913 in the metal room between 12:05pm and 12:10pm.

To make matters even worse, Leo Frank had made a statement, known as State’s Exhibit B, stenographed by Gay C. Febuary on Monday morning, April 28, 1913, where Frank said Mary Phagan had arrived into his office alone between 12:05PM and 12:10PM on April 26, 1913, but Frank’s office was empty according to Monteen Stover during that time, when she came for her pay, and then it happened! Leo replied to this incongruity, by saying he might “unconsciously” have been inside the metal room’s bathroom.

For Leo Frank’s detractors he had made what amounted to a murder confession, for neutral observers it was the devastatingly incriminating statements at his own trial that were ironic, it was the first time ever in Southern history a man indicted for murder had supposed themselves at the scene of the crime, after swearing he wasn’t there, but Frank continued to claim he was innocent despite his dumbfounding revelations.

Leo Frank Trial Closing Arguments August, 1913

Be sure to read the abridged final closing statements of State’s prosecution team leader, the Solicitor General Hugh Manson Dorsey and his Associate Frank Arthur Hooper in American State Trials Volume X (10) 1918 by John Davison Lawson LLD, for their unique take on the Leo Frank trial testimony and evidence. One should also read the really long winded unabridged closing arguments of Hugh Manson Dorsey published in 1914 as ‘The Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey’ (available on archive.org).

Firebrand Tom E. Watson

Many would argue the best post trial analysis of the Leo Frank murder confession is articulated by the criminal defense lawyer, populist and genius Tom Edward Watson, in his Watson’s Magazine, January, March, August, September and October of 1915, and his weekly Jeffersonian Newspaper in specific issues during the years of 1914, 1915, 1916, and 1917. Though his best works on the Leo Frank Trial are found in Watson’s Magazine August, September, October of 1915.

Appeals 1913 to 1915

Numerous half-baked frivolous appeals petitions were made by the Leo Frank Legal Defense Team to the Georgia Superior Court, Georgia Supreme Court, US Federal District Court, and United States Supreme Court, all appeals were denied after careful review, with lengthy decisions written and rendered (see: Leo Frank Appeals 1913, 1914, 1915). In April of 1915, Leo Frank had exhausted all of his court appeals, so he went back to his lawyer Luther Rosser, asking him to request a commutation from his law partner Governor Slaton.

Commutation June 21, 1915

The departing Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton, decided to commute the death sentence of his own client Leo Frank at the 11th hour, to life in prison on June 21, 1915, just days before the end of his last term as Governor. It was an act of political suicide, but it didn’t matter, as Slaton was leaving office anyway on June 26, 1915, and he was likely rewarded handsomely behind the scenes in other ways. Slaton left Georgia and went on a tour of the United States with a briefcase full of greenbacks.

The 12 hundred strong mob formed to angrily protest the commutation, because it was a gross conflict of interest, not because of anti-Semitism. Rarely ever mentioned by Leo Frank partisans is the connection between Leo Frank’s commutation and the fact Governor John M. Slaton was part owner of the lawfirm that represented Leo Frank at his trial and during his appeals. The lawfirm was called Rosser, Brandon, ‘Slaton’ and Phillips (the ‘Slaton’ was Governor John M. Slaton).

Leo Frank Prison Shanking, July 17, 1915

One month after the commutation of Leo Frank got shanked in prison by a fellow inmate named William Creen, who used a 7 inch butcher knife to slash the left side of Leo Frank’s throat. To add anti-Semitic psychological warfare to the incident, rumors began circulating the knife had been used for slaughtering hogs. Leo Frank barely survived the attack, thanks to inmate doctors who came to his aid in the nick of time and stitched him up. The tender wound was slow to heal in the hot & humid summer of 1915.

One month after the shanking and almost 2 months after Leo Frank received his controversial clemency, a well organized group of about 25 to 35 men, many of whom were from Georgia’s highest strata of politics, law and society, organized themselves into the ‘Knights of Mary Phagan’. This newly formed group of Georgia’s elites, sought to fulfill the conviction of the Jury and death sentence judgment ratified by Judge Leonard Strickland Roan. From their point of view, this band of men sought to deliver righteous retribution in the form of “Southern Style Vigilante Justice”, which is called by the mainstream: Lynching.

After more than 2 months of careful planning, Leo Frank was kidnapped from the minimum security Milledgeville prison on the evening of Monday, August 16, 1915, at 10 p.m., then driven all through the night for 8 hours and lynched in the early hours of August 17, 1915, from an oak tree’s sturdy branch in Marietta a few miles away from where Mary Phagan had formerly lived at one time.

Post Lynching, August 17, 1915

Once word got out about the lynching, Leo Frank’s dangling body became a public spectacle, photographs were taken and the pictures of Leo Franks lifeless suspended body, gently twirling in the breeze, became popular post cards and allegedly people snatched pieces of his shirt, transforming them into memorabilia. Leo Frank was cut down and one hot-headed yahoo started stomping on his face and chest and other people had to pull him away, calm the savage down and vote him out.

How the Most Definitive Book on the Leo Frank Case was Born

The book ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ is written by the namesake of the murder victim, Mary Phagan’s great niece named Mary Phagan Kean. When Phagan Kean was 13 years old, she discovered her given name was no mere accident or coincidence. When people heard her name, they started asking her questions about whether she was related to the famous little Mary Phagan who had been murdered long ago by Leo Frank on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913.

Phagan-Kean would learn a startling secret when people started asking her questions about her curious name, so she asked her family if she was somehow connected to the Mary Phagan who was murdered so long ago in the National Pencil Factory. When her family revealed the truth about her blood relation, she immediately became insatiably interested in learning about the investigation, and its aftermath.

Instantly becoming a life long student of the case at age 13, Phagan-Kean has since devoted every free moment of her life studying volumes of legal documents, and reading every surviving newspaper account surrounding the rape and strangulation of her great aunt, 13 year old Mary Anne Phagan (1899 to 1913) and the biography of Leo Max Frank (1884 to 1915).

B’nai B’rith

Leo Frank was the President of the 500 member Atlanta Chapter of B’nai B’rith beginning in 1912, and even after his conviction was unanimously re-elected again in 1913, until his term expired in 1914. As a result of his conviction, the case turned into a national scandal and eventually evolved into a sensational cause celebre. For the Jewish Community, Leo Frank’s conviction, would become the critical mass of “anti-Semitism” catalyzing the formation of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, born in October, 1913, or ADL (www.ADL.org) for short. The lynching of Leo Frank sparked the revival of the defunct and nativist ethnic nationalist Ku Klux Klan (KKK) on November 24, 1915.

The KKK considers themselves the “immune system of the United States of America”, providing an immunal White blood cell response to what they perceived as an infection of the United States of America, as a host-body, by a collectively organized Jewish virus/parasite community. The ADL considers itself on the other hand, the foremost civil rights group in America and the world, defending Jews and Israel against Anti-Semitism, but the ADL is silent about the 60 years of Jewish Genocide on Palestinians, or the Jewish Genocide on Russians during the Soviet Communist era from 1917 to 1991.

Misrepresentations

Jewish Scholars overwhelmingly produced the lion share of all the written “persecution and victim-centric” books, articles, web sites, scripts, video, media, songs, broadway plays and texts about the subject of Leo Frank and Mary Phagan, and almost unanimously allege the investigation, trial, and conviction of Frank where part of a widespread Antisemitic Gentile Sponsored Conspiracy, a text book case of Anti-Semitism; the railroading, and framing of an innocent Northern Jewish Man because of Gentile anti-Jewish racism, prejudice and religious hatred. Leo Frank partisan books often leave out volumes of the relevant facts, evidence and testimony concerning the Leo Frank case, dishonestly spinning the facts convenient to creating doubt about Leo Franks guilty verdict.

If you have any doubts about Leo Frank’s guilt study the brief of evidence and sift it!

1982 and 1983: The Alonzo Mann Media Circus

In 1982, Alonzo Mann, a lonely, broke and senile octogenarian, who also happened to be the former office boy of Leo Frank for three weeks in April, 1913, came forward at the behest of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, with a fantastic tall tale about what he saw on April 26, 1913 at noon.

1982 was about 69 years after the murder of Mary Phagan and trial of Leo M. Frank for her murder. Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann went public with his story claiming he had withheld information from the Leo M. Frank legal defense team, police, Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey, the Judge Leonard Strickland Roan, the Jury of 12 White men, Appeals Courts, Slaton’s Commutation hearing and seven decades of people.

Alonzo Mann said that, he went back to the National Pencil Company Factory five minutes after he left it at noon on April 26, 1913, and saw the Negro Janitor Jim Conley, carrying the body of Mary Phagan on his shoulder, and Jim Conley reached out his hand for Alonzo Mann and said to the young boy, “if you tell anyone , I will kill you”. Alonzo Mann, claimed he ran home and told his family and his mother told him not to tell anyone.

These statements given by Alonzo Mann in the 1980?s made no sense and came off as a desperate web of lies according to many people who heard his newfangled claims.

First, why would White parents in a White racial separatist Georgia of 1913, tell their White son not to tell the police about a “murdering”, and thus ostensibly guilty black janitor Jim Conley, with the result being an “innocent” clean cut White boss, Leo Frank, who gave their son a highly prized job, wrongfully going to gallows? Instead of a guilty Negro?

Second, why would White parents allow their son to report to work on Monday Morning, April 28, 1913, right after their son was threatened with death on Saturday April 26, 1913? Alonzo Mann Reported for work Monday morning, April 28, 1913 when all the forensic revelations were made at the National Pencil Company and he too witnessed them.

Third, if Alonzo Mann admitted in 1982 he lied under oath at the Leo Frank trial in 1913 (about leaving at 11:30 am instead of noon), what’s not to say he wasn’t lying again in 1982 / 1983, when he said he came back at noon. 70 years after the trial, he was asked why he came back, and he said it was about a baseball bet he made with Schiff, but everyone knew Herbert Schiff was not meant to come to work that day – including Herbert Schiff who hinted as such at the trial.

fourth Alonzo Mann said he came back to the factory at 12:05pm, this was about the time Monteen Stover said she came to the factory, how come Monteen Stover didn’t walkin on this horrifying scene either?

The ADL tried to use the Alonzo Mann Affair to get a posthumous pardon at first in 1982-1983, but it failed. Three long years of political machinations, back room wheeling and dealing continued until a second attempt was made.

1986: Second Attempt Successful

In 1986, pressure from the powerful Jewish community, Jewish groups and ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith), resulted in the highly political March 11, 1986 posthumous pardon of Leo Frank without exoneration.

There was only one problem with the highly political pardon of Leo Frank, because Alonzo Mann had died March 19, 1985 and no one could question him about the incident. The politically corrupt board forgave Leo Frank with a pardon, but kept Leo Frank’s GUILT intact and thus did not disturb the verdict of the Leo Frank Trial Judge and Jury.

On March 11, 1986, a pardon without exoneration of guilt was issued by the board:

Without attempting to address the question of guilt or innocence, and in recognition of the State’s failure to protect the person of Leo M. Frank and thereby preserve his opportunity for continued legal appeal of his conviction, and in recognition of the State’s failure to bring his killers to justice, and as an effort to heal old wounds, the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, in compliance with its Constitutional and statutory authority, hereby grants to Leo M. Frank a Pardon.

A most grotesque symbol of ADL political power just unraveled.

Even with the posthumous pardon, it was specified the guilt of Leo M. Frank remains permanently intact, because his official conviction was not changed, disturbed or tampered with from 1913 to 1986. As of March 11, 1986, Leo M. Frank remains guilty in the eyes of Black Letter and Settled Law forever more, though he was forgiven of his crime by the board, he was not forgiven by the public that detests pedophile-rapists and child killers.

A number of fictionalized media dramatizations and treatments have been made about the case in the form of miniseries, Broadway plays, Hollywood dramas, political docudramas, video blogs, and songs, conducted across the international media landscape, all mostly created by Jews making a mockery of the life of a little Christian girl, Mary Phagan, who is used as nothing more than a plot device to launch Leo Frank’s persecution hoax at the hands of evil Gentiles.

Attempts for more than 100 years are continually being launched to idealize and rehabilitate the image of Leo Frank as an innocent and stoic Jewish victim of anti-Semitism.

The efforts to transfigure Leo Frank from a perverted pedophile rapist and strangler into a holy Jewish religious martyr of collective Gentile prejudice has continued unchallenged.

The blood libel against the Leo Frank prosecution team, European-Americans and people who think Leo Frank is guilty, continues to this day by the organized Jewish community. The Leo Frank Case is a Jewish-Gentile conflict that has been smoldering for 100 years and continues to inflame both sides.

Three Leo M. Frank Admissions Equivalent to Murder Confessions From the 1913 Brief of Evidence

1. Jim Conley, Saturday, April 26, 1913, circa noon to 1:00 PM (See Jim Conley affidavits and trial testimony in the brief of evidence (1913) and Georgia supreme court case file about Leo Frank (1913, 1914).

2. Lucille Selig Frank, Saturday Late Evening, April 26, 1913, 10:30 PM (See State’s Exhibit J, Brief of Evidence, 1913)

3. The Public, Monday, August 18, 1913, (Leo Frank’s four hour unsworn trial statement, August 18, Brief of Evidence, 1913). Leo Frank’s explanation on the witness stand to the trial jury, why Monteen Stover had found his office was empty between 12:05pm and 12:10pm on April 26, 1913, with an unconscious bathroom visit: (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913, p. 186).

The Fourth Leo Frank Admission that Amounted to an authorized Jailhouse Murder Confession Published in the Atlanta Constitution

4. Leo Frank confirmed his August 18, 1913, murder trial bathroom admission-confession in the March 9, 1914, issue of the Atlanta Constitution.

Leo Frank’s defenders won’t ever dare to mention the “unconscious” bathroom murder trial confession that Leo Frank made on the witness stand when he was giving his four hour unsworn statement at the trial on Monday afternoon, August 18, 1913, between 2:15pm and 6:00pm. Thoughtful and analytical interpretations of the statement Leo Frank made to counter Monteen Stover’s testimony are always left out of most Leo Frank revisionist books, even though it proves Leo Frank’s guilt indisputably when juxtaposed with State’s Exhibit B and Jim Conley testimony about finding Mary Phagan dead in the metalroom bathroom (see: State’s Exhibit A, item #9), at the behest of Leo Frank (see: Leo Frank’s trial statement, Monteen Stover’s trial testimony, State’s Exhibit B, Jim Conley’s trial testimony and affidavits, brief of evidence, 1913).

Leo Frank is the only person in early 20th century US history to make what amounted to a murder confession at his own trial, leaving most people gobsmacked by it.

See: The final closing arguments of Hugh M. Dorsey, Frank Arthur Hooper (American State Trials, Volume X, 1918, John D. Lawson) and Tom Watson’s analysis of Leo Frank’s trial admission amounting to a murder confession (Watson Magazine, September, 1915).

Be sure to study, the Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913, and the 1,800 page Leo M. Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case File (1913, 1914).

More excellent sources on the Frank-Phagan Case include:

0. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913 – The first neutral book written on the subject. Very interesting read.

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (Available here on www.Archive.org). Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events surrounding the trial of Leo Frank. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is well worth reading and it is a refreshing change from the endless number of Jewish and contemporary books turning the Leo Frank case into a neurotic race obsessed tabloid controversy.

2. American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson (Available here on www.Archive.org and LeoFrank.org) Tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team, this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some important things said and details when it republishes parts of the trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the 1913 murder trial brief of evidence found on www.LeoFrank.org and you can see what was left out.

3. Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank (Available here on www.archive.org and www.LeoFrank.org). Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this books. It can be found here on archive.org thanks to leofrank.org. This is an excellent book and required reading to see how Dorsey in sales vernacular ‘closed’ a Jury of 12 men and Judge Roan.

4. Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of Evidence. Extremely rare, only 1 copy exists, and it is at the Georgia State Archive. This document is available now on LeoFrank.org.

Three Major Atlanta Dailies: The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta Journal, The Atlanta Georgian (Hearst’s Tabloid Yellow Journalism), The most relevant issues center around April 28th to August 27th 1913.

5. Atlanta Constitution Newspaper: The Murder of Mary Phagan, Coroner’s Inquest, Grand Jury, Investigation, Trail, Appeals, Shanking and Lynching of Leo Frank Case in the Atlanta Constitution Newspaper from 1913 to 1915. http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

6. The Atlanta Georgian newspaper covering the Leo Frank Case from April though August, 1913. http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

7. The Atlanta Journal (Online Now at Archive.org)

Leo Frank confirms he might have been in the bathroom at the time Monteen Stover said his office was empty: See the Atlanta Constitution, Monday, March 9, 1914, Leo Frank Jailhouse Interview

Tom Watson

8. Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper (1914, 1915, 1916 and 1917) and Watson’s Magazine: Watson’s Magazine, January 1915, Watson’s Magazine, March 1915; Watson’s Magazine, August 1915, Watson’s Magazine, September 1915, and Watson’s Magazine, October of 1915. (Available here on www.Archive.org). Tom Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank case was published in August and September 1915. Watson’s five major magazine works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with the superb reasoning of a genius lawyer.

These five 1915 works are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Tom Watson’s magazine publications surged from 30,000 to 100,000 copies, when it was announced he would be writing on the Leo Frank case. These magazines are extremely rare and very difficult to find. However they have been scanned and are available on both www.Archive.org and www.leofrank.org

8.1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: Archive.org

Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper

9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson

There are Leo Frank cult members posing as neutral reviewers who do not want you to read Tom Watson’s five 1915 magazine works on the Leo Frank trial, read them and find out why! They are the controversial forbidden fruit of truth in the Leo M. Frank case that have been censored for more than 100 years.

Be sure to also read Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspapers on the Leo M. Frank case.

Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper

9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson

Tom Watson Brown, Grandson of Thomas Edward Watson

10. Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank, By Tom W. Brown, Emery University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982.

Leo Frank Case Research Portal

11. The Best Leo Frank Research http://www.leofrank.org and http://www.theamericanmercury.org

Leo Frank Discussion Forum

12. www.LeoFrankCase.com

Check out the articles about Leo Frank on Live Leak.

 

Write a review
Downloaded 3,045 times Reviews
Average Rating: 2.76 out of 5 stars2.76 out of 5 stars2.76 out of 5 stars

Reviewer: Macro Man5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars – October 27, 2012
Subject: Justice for little Mary Anne Phagan in this Book
God Bless You 13 yr old little Mary Phagan. I hope you can finally rest in peace with the truth being known to everybody in the years exceeding 2013. Phagan deserves the right to sleep without all the misinformation about Frank being innocent. Please stop spreading blood-libel accusations that Frank was framed and lynched because of Antisemitism. Any 21st century jury would have convicted Frank based on the testimony and exhibits. Governor Slaton disqualified himself because his lawfirm represented Leo Frank.

Reviewer: manhattansunrise

5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars5.00 out of 5 stars – October 14, 2012
Subject: Required Reading on Leo Frank and Mary Phagan
The beginning section of this book was a bit slow and difficult to get through. I almost put the book down for good, but glad I didn’t because once into the meat and substance of the book, it was smooth sailing and well worth reading from cover to cover! There seems to be a lot of people writing hate reviews about the book on Amazon.com, but thankfully the owner of this out of print book made it available free online.

What is very interesting and seldom talked about is that Leo Frank made a statement to the court that essentially amounted to a murder confession. Leo Frank essentially admitted to murdering Mary Phagan at his trial when he mounted the witness stand and told the Jury he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in he metal room during the time Monteen Stover waited in his empty office from 12:05 to 12:10, April 26, 1913. He formerly told the police Mary Phagan was with him in his office during this exact time. The State of Georgia’s prosecution built its case around the theory Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the metal room between 12:05 p.m. and 12:10 p.m.

It was a shocking metal room admission coming from Leo Frank who denied knowing his employee Mary Phagan, but had been her boss for 1 year (spring of 1912 to 1913) and passed by her work station each day on his way to the bathroom in the metal room.

For the best interpretations of the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder trial confession, you can read the closing arguments of State prosecution lawyers Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh M Dorsey in American State Trials Volume X 1918 by John D. Lawson LLD.

However, Tom Watson’s post trial analysis of the Leo Frank murder trial confession is the most enjoyable to read in his August and September Watson’s Magazine (1915). It drives Leo Frank partisans to a foaming at the mouth frenzy, and you can’t help but enjoy their squirming, cheesy excuses and screeching with utter delight.

The journey Mary Phagan Kean went through to discover the facts and circumstances surrounding the case was very interesting and captivating to say the least. Having read the other books on this particular murder case, this book, I agree is probably the most even handed on the subject.

I highly recommend this book!

Be sure to read it and the other books listed above as well.

Oh My God! Were their really four Leo Frank admissions that amounted to murder confessions?

Spoiler Alert:

Within the 318 page official legal records of the Leo M. Frank 1913 trial brief of evidence is testimony and affidavits revealing Leo Frank confessed to murdering Mary Phagan three times, though he would deny all three.

In the Atlanta Constitution March 9, 1914, Leo Frank would make a fourth admission that amounted to a murder confession. This was two days after Judge Benjamin Hill resentenced Leo Frank to hang by the neck until dead, scheduled on his 30th birthday, April 17, 1914.

Leo Frank Alleged Admission Number Three that Amounted to a Murder Trial Confession: August 18, 1913, Fulton County Superior Courthouse During the Leo Frank Trial

The third Leo Frank murder confession occurred on August 18, 1913, when Leo Frank mounted the witness stand at his trial (July 28 to August 26) to make a 4 hour unsworn statement. He told the packed courtroom, Judge and Jury – in response to Monteen Stover testifying that his office had been empty on April 26, 1913, from 12:05pm to 12:10pm – Leo Frank stated he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the metal room. It was the spine chilling crescendo of the trial, because Leo Frank had stated to the Atlanta police on Monday, April 28, 1913, Mary Phagan had arrived in his office between 12:05pm and 12:10pm, Maybe 12:07pm on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913 (State’s Exhibit B).

It was a slam dunk for the State’s prosecution, because Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey and his legal team had spent 29 days during the trial trying to prove to the Jury that Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the second floor metal room between 12:05pm and 12:10om, on April 26, 1913.

Leo Frank’s Alleged Murder Confession Number One: April 26, 1913, Noon Hour

Leo Frank’s alleged murder confession number one was made to Jim Conley, when Leo Frank told him he had tried to have sex with Mary Phagan and she refused him, and as a result of rejecting him, he assaulted her.

Mary Phagan’s bloody hair was discovered on Monday, April 28, 1913, at 6:35 A.M. tangled on the handle of a bench lathe in the second floor metal room by Robert P. Barret, along with a 5 inch wide blood stain on the floor in front of the girls dressing room. (Leo Frank Brief of Evidence, 1913)

Leo Frank Alleged Murder Confession Number Two: April 26, 1913 at 68 East Georgia Avenue, the Selig Residece

Leo Frank confessed murdering Mary Phagan to his wife Lucille Selig Frank on the evening of April 26, 1913 at 10:30 P.M. Leo Frank said he didn’t know why he would murder and asked his wife for his pistol so he could shoot himself. Lucille told her family and cook Minola McKnight about what happened. (State’s Exhibit J, June 3rd, 1913)

On April 23, 1957, when Lucille Selig Frank died of heart failure (= a broken heart?), her last will and testament, notarized and registered with the local government in Atlanta in 1954, requested that she be cremated (Last Will and Testament of Lucille S. Frank, 1954). The grave plot to the immediate left of Leo M. Frank in the Mount Carmel Cemetery, had been reserved for Lucille Selig Frank, but to this day it remains empty. Not even Lucille’s ashes are there. They were buried in the Oakland cemetery in Atlanta between her parent’s headstones.

Those are the three Leo Frank murder confessions within the official record, but there is one more.

Leo Frank Murder Confession Number Four Went Public: March 9, 1914, Atlanta Constitution

Leo Frank gave a jailhouse interview to an Atlanta Constitution journalist and it was published on March 9, 1914. Leo Frank’s statements published in the Atlanta Constitution confirmed and supported his August 18, 1913, trial statement admission, that amounted to a murder trial confession.

=============SUMMARY

So why does the ADL still champion this ineffable piece of manure?

1) According to the Talmud, Jews have a right to do whatever they want to goyim. So for Jews, what Frank did was not even wrong, only getting caught. That was “bad for the Jews.”

2) Sticking up for Frank shows both Jews and goyim the power of Jewish solidarity and clout. This is a demonstration of Jewish might to inspire fear — certainly bribing a governor shows power — and it is the public display of in-group bonding, right or wrong. Jews call themselves “The Tribe.”

But we weep for Mary Ann Phagan, and we salute her courage, fighting to the death. We salute District Attorney Hugh Dorsey, and publisher Tom Watson, and (in this case) the justified lynchers, who violated only unjust laws of man for a Higher law from God. And we hail all who have championed her for decades, such as her grand-niece and the comrades behind the gigantic compendium of facts known as

http://www.leofrank.org

The tomb of 13-year-old Mary, who worked 55 hours a week to support her mother and five siblings, tortured and killed by a B’nai B’rith official.

She is the real victim, as are we all by living in jew world.

mary-phagan-tombtone

On June 25, 1915, a marble slab six feet long was laid over Mary Phagan’s grave in Marietta, one day before Leo Frank was executed by the manly forces of the people.

On it was carved an inscription, written by publisher Tom Watson, now often decorated with toy animals by young and older visitors. It began:

.

“In this day of fading ideals and disappearing landmarks,

little Mary Phagan’s heroism is an heirloom

than which there is nothing more precious

among the old red hills of Georgia.”

 

red-hills-of-georgia

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2015   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Speech, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

CUI BONO? by Professor Revilo P. Oliver (May 1992)

Americans who do not read German readily will be glad to know that the fine historical study by Ingrid Weckert, *Feuerzeichen, die “Reichskristallnacht”* (Tbingen, 1981), which was reviewed in *Liberty Bell* by Dr. Charles E. Weber, January 1989, pp. 15-20, and mentioned in the issue for April-May 1991, pp. 95-96, 104-105, has been translated into […]

Fair Usage Law

May 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, White Racism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so […]

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

The International Jew by Henry Ford the Most Bigoted Book Ever Written Since Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf

Please contact the Internet Archive and ask them to censor this hate book, before bigots download this book and upload it everywhere on the Internet. Please contact The Internet Archive, before bigots download this book and turn it into an audiobook (written in 2015).https://archive.org/details/TheInternationalJewTheWorldsForemostProblemhenryFord1920s_201510Hate update 2017: Alex Linder turned this book into a radio program! […]

Fair Usage Law

January 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Un-American Subversive Theatre: Parade the Leo Frank Broadway Musical Becomes International Cult Sensation

If you asked any of your friends, acquaintances, or family members, whether or notthey’ve heard of the Jewish activist musical called ‘Parade’, chances are most peoplewould likely shake their heads and say something along the lines of, “No, I’ve neverheard of it before”. Yet amongst theatre fans around the world, ‘Parade’ is a cultclassic. In […]

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Multicultural News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Zionism  Comments Closed

Kill All Pedophiles by John de Nugent

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Speech, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

ADL Sponsored Alonzo Mann Hoax for the Posthumous Pardon of Leo Frank in 1986: Anniversary of Leo Frank Decision by Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles

March 11th is the anniversary of Leo Max Frank’s Posthumous Pardon that was officiated in 1986 thanks to the ADL taking the lead for many years, pressing this issue hard behind the scenes. Despite the ADL taking the lead on this effort, three Jewish organizations worked together in this effort: Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, […]

Fair Usage Law

March 11, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Leo Frank, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC  Comments Closed

Jewish Ritual Murder

The Bloody Truth about Jewish Ritual MurderA Review of the Ritual Murder of St. Andrei Youschinsky by Menachem Mendel Beilis, and Other Grisly Crimes “A post-mortem examination revealed upon his body 47 wounds, all having evidently been inflicted with an awl or chisel-like instrument and with every indication of system, in order to draw the […]

Fair Usage Law

August 8, 2015   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Discrimination News, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Multicultural News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Download Frazier Glenn Miller’s Book “A White Man Speaks Out” While You Still Can; Miller Arrested As Person Of Interest In Kansas Shootings

Most readers undoubtedly know that 73-year-old longtime white racial activist Frazier Glenn Miller, who media outlets are also identifying as Frazier Glenn Cross, has been arrested as a person of interest in the shooting of three different people at two different Jewish centers in the Kansas City metro area on April 13th, 2014. The shooter […]

Fair Usage Law

May 23, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Hate Crimes, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Southern Poverty Law Center, Terrorism, White Nationalism, White Power, White Supremacism, William Luther Pierce, Zionism  Comments Closed

The One Hundredth Anniversary of the Murder of Mary Phagan, that Led to the Leo Frank’s Conviction and the Founding of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith

ENGLISH The relevance of Mary Phagan to white children todayby John de Nugent on April 26, 2013My sheriff race makes the legal case for the murder by Leo Max Frank of Mary Ann Phagan, though now a century old, even more important now than it already has been since 1913.The Leo Frank case is also […]

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2015   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Speech, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."