Archive for the ‘Anti-Semitism’ Category

The Slap on the Wrist Jewish Pedophile Porn Scandal B’nai B’rith, The Organization that Founded the Anti-Defamation League

B’nai Brith Leader Sentenced: 45 Days for Child Rape Videos

Published by admin, on November 2nd, 2010

Time is to be served on weekends, plus 240 hours of community service.

BILL SURKIS says he downloaded close to nine hours of videos of men raping girls as young as 6 because he is curious by nature and likes to learn. (ILLUSTRATION: Bill Surkis, right, with attorney Slimovitch)

But the former Quebec regional director of B’nai Brith gave little thought to the fact his actions feed a booming child pornography industry that sexually exploits young girls and makes them victims on cyberspace forever, a crown prosecutor said yesterday.

Indeed, during his sentencing hearing yesterday, the 71-year-old father and grandfather didn’t mention the prepubescent girls who appeared in the 21 videos found on his computer.

Instead, it was his own image that concerned him most.

“It’s exceptionally difficult to undergo what I’ve gone through, what I put my family through, my friends and my community through,” Surkis told Quebec Court as his wife looked on from the front row of the room.

“It’s difficult to get undressed in public so many times.

“I destroyed my life and parts of my family’s life.”

The Crown and defence agreed yesterday that Surkis should receive a jail term of 45 days, to be served on weekends, do 240 hours of community work and be placed on probation for three years.

But they don’t agree on the probation conditions.

Lawyer Steven Slimovitch argued Surkis shouldn’t be placed on the national sex offender registry nor be required to submit a DNA sample because he isn’t a pedophile.

He described his client as a “stellar” member of the community and, quoting from eight reference letters from prominent clergy and rabbis, Slimovitch said Surkis was an “outspoken defender of human rights.”

Surkis told the court that if his name was placed on the sex registry, he wouldn’t be able to “serve his community.”

…At the time of his arrest, Surkis said he had downloaded the pornography to educate himself before giving public lectures about abuse on the Internet.

Read the full story at the Montreal Gazette

Fair Usage Law

July 3, 2012   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Speech, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed

Leo Frank, another Jew pedophile child murderer | Neo Nutzi Haters

This is how the enemy Jew was treated before, and this is how he will be treated in the near future. Jew Leo Frank raped and murdered a non-Jewish little girl. The Jews tried to get this beast released, the people gave him the

Leo Frank, another Jew pedophile child murderer

Posted on June 15, 2012

JewishProblem.com recently received an e-mail from an enemy Jew named Harold Walstein:

“Are you the guys who created the anti-semitic hate site LeoFrank.org ?”

I would like to respond by threatening all of Zion with the most painful death accompanied with this picture dedicated to all Jewish fans of JewishProblem.com:

International Jewry will soon be wiped out from planet Earth, and humanity will prosper just like the Germans did after Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement liberated its people from the death grip of Zion.

Go to LeoFrank.org to read about yet another reason for why this filthy race must be hacked to pieces.

This is how the enemy Jew was treated before, and this is how he will be treated in the near future. Jew Leo Frank raped and murdered a non-Jewish little girl. The Jews tried to get this beast released, the people gave him the punishment he will never return from. He was sent to hell prematurely, and so will the rest of his disgusting race sooner than they think. It’s unworthy of humanity to let a single Jew die naturally and comfortably from old age.

Jews actually tried to get this unhuman child-raping murderer pardoned! If you need more reasons for understanding why all Jews need to be eradicated, then maybe you should try curing your mental philo-Jew disease. The fact that a Jew pedophile got his just punishment, scared the entire Jewry in North America to form the Jewish advocacy group for Jew pedophiles and child molesting murderers, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith:

Visit link:
Leo Frank, another Jew pedophile child murderer | The Jewish …

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Leo Frank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Holocaust Does Not Stand Up to 21st Century Scientific and Forensic Studies: Auschwitz, The End of a Legend, Carlo Mattogno

In this meticulously written work, Italian scholar Carlo Mattogno demolishes the boldest attempt yet to answer the revisionist critique of the Auschwitz extermination story.

Advance praise for

Auschwitz: The End of a Legend (Click Here)

Carlo Mattogno has performed yeoman service for the cause of truth by showing how unjustified Jean-Claude Pressac is in reviving once more the old legend that there really were gas chambers used for the mass annihilation of millions of Jews at Auschwitz. He shows how Pressac has misinterpreted his data and has thereby in reality been a “crypto-revisionist,” rather than a true “exterminationist.” In his confused argumentation, Pressac has demonstrated ignorance of the structure and functioning of both crematory ovens and gas chambers, and of the nature and use of the disinfectant Zyklon B. Pressac’s use of such statistics as exist is arbitrary and largely fanciful, resulting in a down-sizing of the number of alleged victims. Where information does not exist, Pressac invents it, often with mutually contradictory arguments in different parts of his presentation (e.g. concerning the purpose and use of the crematoria as supposedly intended by the SS). With his relentless deconstruction of Pressac’s affirmations and interpretations, and his demonstration of Pressac’s incompetence, Mattogno has hammered one more nail into the coffin of the old myth of the mass murder of Jews at Auschwitz and elsewhere.

— A. Dibert, pen name of a professor emeritus at an Ivy League university.

http://holocausthandbooks.com/

Specifically:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&sort=voa&s=0&st=24#entries

Fair Usage Law

June 11, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jews, Judaism, Neo Nazi, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

Canada: Criticism of Israel is the New Anti-Semitism

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/07/20117206368409551.html

Nearly two years after the first hearings were held in Ottawa, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition fto Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) released a detailed report on July 7 that found that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Canada, especially on university campuses.

While the CPCCA’s final report does contain some cases of real anti-Semitism, the committee has provided little evidence that anti-Semitism has actually increased in Canada in recent years. Instead, it has focused a disproportionate amount of effort and resources on what it calls a so-called “new anti-Semitism”: criticism of Israel.

Indeed, the real purpose of the CPCCA coalition seems to be to stifle critiques of Israeli policy and disrupt pro-Palestinian solidarity organizing in Canada, including, most notably, Israeli Apartheid Week events. Many of the CPCCA’s findings, therefore, must be rejected as both an attack on freedom of speech and freedom of protest, and as recklessly undermining the fight against real instances of anti-Semitism.

The CPCCA and its findings

The Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) was born out of a conference held in London in February 2009 by the Inter-Parliamentary Committee for Combating Anti-Semitism. Formed in March 2009 and not directly linked to the Canadian government, or to any NGO or advocacy group, the CPCCA included 22 Canadian Parliament members from across party lines. Former Liberal MP Mario Silva chaired the Inquiry Panel and Conservative MP Scott Reid led the Steering Committee.

Between November 2009 and January 2010, the CPCCA held ten separate hearings during which time representatives of various non-governmental organizations, religious institutions, police departments and Canadian and Israeli universities presented papers meant to assess the level of anti-Semitism in Canada. While groups critical of Israel were denied the chance to address the committee, major Zionist organizations like B’nai Brith Canada, Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, and the Canadian Jewish Congress were welcomed.

“Much of today’s anti-Semitism manifests in anti-Israel agitation around boycotts, divestment and sanctions,” said Avi Benlolo, President and CEO of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies, during a hearing in November 2009. “It deploys an unfair double standard against the Jewish state, singling out of Israel alone for one-sided, harsh criticism and calls for punitive actions.”

Throughout the consultation process, the CPCCA regularly focused on Canadian university campuses, which were routinely described as hotbeds of anti-Semitism, where Jewish students or students with pro-Israel leanings are often intimidated and threatened. This accusation was made repeatedly, and included in the CPCCA’s final report, despite the fact that Dr. Fred Lowy, President Emeritus of Concordia University in Montreal, stated in his address to the CPCCA that, “by and large, Canadian campuses are safe and are not hotbeds of anti-Semitism of any kind”.

In its final report, the CPCCA made about two dozen recommendations on how best to fight anti-Semitism in Canada. While the report states that “criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, and saying so is wrong”, it also found that “singling Israel out for selective condemnation and opprobrium … is discriminatory and hateful” and many of its recommendations deal with combating this “new anti-Semitism”.

A major recommendation issued by the CPCCA was that the Canadian government should promote the working definition of anti-Semitism used by The European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). This definition categorizes “applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation” as anti-Semitic.

In other words, the CPCCA is supporting a definition whereby individuals who focus their attention on Israeli human rights violations, yet don’t level an equal amount of condemnation on other states for their human rights violations, can be labeled as anti-Semitic. This is obviously problematic since Palestine solidarity activists – like any other people – have commitments that make it impossible to engage with every issue they are otherwise interested in. They shouldn’t be labeled as anti-Semitic due to their inability to participate in every single human rights struggle happening around the world.

Another dangerous recommendation made by the CPCCA was that Canadian university administrators should condemn “discourse, events and speakers which are untrue, harmful, or not in the interest of academic discourse, including Israeli Apartheid Week”. Even the use of the word “apartheid” in relation to Israel is anti-Semitic, the CPCCA found, since it amounts to the “denial of the Jewish people their right to self- determination … by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor”.

This clearly violates freedom of speech and an open exchange of ideas at Canadian universities, and also unfairly and inaccurate labels Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) as anti-Semitic. In reality, IAW has since 2005 brought together respected activists, academics, journalists and cultural figures from around the world, including Judith Butler, Ronnie Kasrils, Noam Chomsky and Ali Abunimah, among others, to openly discuss ideas related to Israel/Palestine.

IAW provides an educational space for understanding Israel’s apartheid policies – as evidenced, for example, through the separate legal systems used by Israelis and Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank or the discriminatory land ownership laws operating inside Israel – and supports the growing campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), which aims to non-violently pressure Israel to respect international law. It is far from the “uniformly well-organized, aggressive [campaign] designed to make the Jewish state and its supporters pariahs” the CPCCA report makes it out to be.

The CPCCA also recommended that the Canadian Committee of Foreign Affairs undertake a study on the United Nations Human Rights Council, “particularly regarding its over-emphasis of alleged human rights abuses by Israel, while ignoring flagrant human rights abuses of other member states”.

This clearly demonstrates how the committee has confounded anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel, and is prepared to levy dubious suspicions against UN bodies and tarnish Canada’s international standing in the process.

In a statement released on July 8, Thomas Woodley, President of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), said that the CPCCA’s recommendations, “if implemented, will inhibit public discussion of Israel’s conduct”.

“CJPME believes that conclusions and recommendations generated by a process in which the same body – the CPCCA – is prosecutor, jury, and judge, are not credible. Although a few of the witnesses recounted incidents that were indeed indicative of genuine anti-Semitism, many were complaining about merely being exposed to criticism of the Israel’s conduct,” the CJPME press release stated.

Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) Canada also criticized the committee, stating that “the CPCCA’s goal is to criminalize criticism of Israel and Zionism, not to hold impartial hearings. Therefore, we oppose the CPCCA as an ideologically biased organization with an agenda that will harm free speech and human rights activity in Canada. We oppose the CPCCA’s Orwellian distortion of anti-Semitism. It is a danger to both Canadian liberties and to the genuine and necessary fight against anti-Semitism.”

Reflection of official Canadian policy

While labeling critics of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic is nothing new, the level at which this accusation is now being used in Canadian discourse must be seen as a reflection of the Canadian government’s official and current policy on the Middle East.

“When Israel, the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack, is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation, I believe we are morally obligated to take a stand. Demonization, double standards, de-legitimization, the three D’s, it is the responsibility of us all to stand up to them,” Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in 2010 at the Ottawa Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism, which was supported by the CPCCA. Harper added:

“Harnessing disparate anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel, as the source of injustice and conflict in the world and uses, perversely, the language of human rights to do so. We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is.”

Under Harper, Canada has routinely defended Israeli intransigence and disregard for international law and the human rights of the Palestinian people under its control. In return, trade cooperation and military and security technologies ties have been strengthened between the two states.

In May of this year, it was reported that Harper was adamantly opposed to making any reference to the 1967 borders in a G8 summit statement calling for renewed Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Far-right Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman thanked Harper for his position, and stated, “Canada is a true friend of Israel”.

In 2010, Canada announced it would discontinue its financial contributions to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the organization that provides support and resources to approximately 4.7m registered Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the occupied Palestinian territories, and funnel the money into greater policing and security institutions run by the un-elected and corrupt Palestinian Authority leadership instead.

In January 2009, as the Israeli army continued its disproportionate attack on the besieged civilian population in Gaza that left 1,400 Palestinians dead in the span of three weeks, Canada was the only country out of 47 that voted against a motion at the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning the Israeli violence.
In addition to providing diplomatic cover for Israel, the Canadian government has attacked and cut funding to various non-governmental organizations working on issues related to Israel/Palestine, including Kairos Churches and Alternatives International.

Canadian Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney, who led the formation of the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) and is an ex-officio member, has also repeatedly alleged that the Canadian Arab Federation promotes anti-Semitism and hatred. While Kenney never backed up these claims, the Canadian Arab Federation’s contracts with the government – which helped finance language programs for Toronto-area immigrants (the majority of whom are of Chinese origin) – were not renewed in 2009.

Undermining the fight against real anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism, like all other forms of racism, is appalling and must be strongly and unequivocally condemned.
But by defining legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and pro-Palestinian activism in Canada as anti-Semitic, the CPCCA is not only threatening free speech and freedom of protest, but it is undermining the fight against real cases of anti-Semitism and weakening the seriousness with which such cases should be dealt.

This is something that Canadians, and people everywhere, should be adamantly against.

Jillian Kestler-D’Amours is a Canadian freelance journalist based in Jerusalem. She regularly contributes to The Electronic Intifada, Inter-Press Service and Free Speech Radio News. More of her work can be found at http://jkdamours.com/

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

Fair Usage Law

May 28, 2012   Posted in: AIPAC, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Speech, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jewish, Jews, Mossad, Multicultural News, Racism News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, Zionism  Comments Closed

This Day in Jewish History: The Pedophile Scandal, Leo Frank B’nai B’rith President Arrested April 29 for Raping and Strangling 13-year Old Girl

In his 742 page magnum opus about the Leo Frank case, author Steve Oney shamelessly failed to inform the reader of who ultimately solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery in 1913.

Spoiler Alert: Leo Frank made an admission during his trial that amounted to a murder confession.

On Monday morning April 28, 1913, Leo Frank was taken to the Atlanta Police Station for routine questioning during the critical first 48 hours of the Mary Phagan murder investigation. In an interrogation room, Leo Frank was flanked by his two elite lawyers, Luther Z. Rosser and Herbert Haas, and surrounded by a team of police, staff and detectives. Leo Frank made a deposition concerning his whereabouts during Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913, and about his “brief” encounter with Mary Phagan minutes after high noon.

Leo Frank’s statement was stenographed by a government magistrate named Mr. February, and the statement became part of the official record at the Leo Frank trial, registered as State’s Exhibit B (Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913). Leo Frank specifically stated that Mary Phagan entered his 2nd floor office on Saturday, April 26, 1913 between “12:05 pm and 12:10 pm, maybe 12:07 pm”. Leo Frank also repeatedly told the police and detectives that he never left his office on April 26, 1913 between twelve noon and 12:45 pm. However, Leo Frank’s timeline alibi would dramatically change at his trial (which took place from July 28 to August 21, 1913) on August 18, 1913, when he mounted the witness stand.

At the trial of Leo Frank (accused of murdering Mary Phagan), a young 14-year old girl named Monteen Stover who formerly worked at the National Pencil Company testified she went there to collect her pay envelope inside Leo Frank’s office on Saturday, April 26, 1913, at 12:05 p.m. and found Leo Frank’s office completely empty. Monteen Stover described waiting inside the office for five minutes until 12:10 pm and then left, because she thought the factory might have been deserted. If Monteen Stover was telling the truth, she had inadvertently broken Leo Frank’s alibi concerning his whereabouts on that fateful day. What was ironic about Monteen Stover is that she was a positive character defense witness for Leo Frank, unlike 19 of his other employees and associates whose testimony suggested Leo Frank was a lecherous, licentious, lascivious and libertine boss.

Leo Frank specifically answered on August 18, 1913, why Monteen Stover found his office empty on Saturday, April 26, 1913 between 12:05pm and 12:10pm, and in doing so, Leo Frank solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery.

Three weeks into the trial on August 18, 1913, Leo Frank mounted the witness stand at 2:15 pm to make an unsworn courtroom speech to the judge and jury on the record. During Leo Frank’s 4-hour trial statement, he refused to be examined or cross examined by defense and prosecution counselors, but he answered the question everyone wanted to know by directly responding to the testimony of Monteen Stover about why his office was empty on April 26, 1913 between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm. Leo Frank contradicted his earlier statement to the police and explained this five minute absence with a newfangled admission saying he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the Metal Room!

It was an astonishing, jaw dropping, and spine-tingling admission by Leo M. Frank that left everyone in courtroom perplexed, because there was only one bathroom on the second floor and it was located inside the Metal Room – the real scene of the crime. Leo Frank not only put himself in the Metal Room where all the forensic evidence suggested Mary Phagan had been murdered, but he put himself in the specific location at which Jim Conley testified he found the dead body of Mary Phagan.

The newfangled explanation delivered by Leo Frank on August 18, 1913 at 2:45 pm to the judge and jury was considered the equivalent of a murder confession, because the state’s prosecution team spent the entire duration of the four week long trial proving Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the metal room on April 26, 1913 between 12:05 pm and 12:10 pm.

The Metal Room was down the hall from Leo Frank’s office, and the place Mary Phagan had toiled for more than a year at a wage of 7 and 4/11th cents an hour. The Metal Room was where Leo Frank went to use the bathroom each and every day, as he worked down the hall in his second floor office at the front section of the National Pencil Company. When Leo Frank went to the bathroom each day between the year’s time during the Spring of 1912 and 1913 that Mary Phagan was employed, he had to immediately pass by her work station within a matter of feet, but Leo Frank denied knowing Mary Phagan even at the trial, and it became an incriminating point of contention against him.

At the trial Jim Conley reported that he discovered the dead body of Phagan in the metal department (Metal Room) bathroom at the behest of Leo Frank. Conley stated that Leo Frank asked him to move the cadaver of Mary Phagan to the basement furnace where garbage was normally placed before incinerated. In the fallout of Jim Conley refusing to complete the job of stuffing Mary Phagan into the furnace for $200 (and thereby destroying the evidence), Conley instead agreed to write the “death notes” pinning the bludgeoning, rape and strangulation of Mary Phagan on a tall, dark, and slim black man named Newt Lee, the factory nightwatchman and security guard recently employed at the factory for less than 3 weeks. The “death notes” were found next to the dead body of Mary Phagan and they describe her going to “make water” in the only place she could “make water”, which was the bathroom in the Metal Room on the second floor. There was no bathroom accessible on the first floor and the one in the dark dingy basement was for “Negroes Only.”

On Monday morning, April 28, 1913, a factory employee named Robert P. Barret discovered a bloody tress of hair tangled on the steel handle of his lathe in the metal room, and moments later a 5” inch wide fan-shaped bloodstain on the floor of the Metal Room in front of the girls dressing room next to the bathroom. Barret testified about the forensic evidence he found and it pointed to the same conclusion about the Metal Room being the scene of a heinous crime of violence with a very poor clean-up job. All of the evidence presented at the trial pointed to the Metal Room as the real scene of the crime.

Jim Conley saying he found Mary Phagan dead in the Metal Room bathroom at the behest of Leo Frank and Leo Frank saying he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the Metal Room at the same time he originally told the police that Mary Phagan was in his office (State’s Exhibit B), and at the same time Monteen Stover said Leo Frank’s office was empty, resulted in the case coming together at the murder trial with absolute precision.

Leo Frank entrapped himself beyond escape at his trial on August 18, 1913, at 2:45 pm.

Many have asked how many times in the annals of United States legal history has the accused made an admission that amounted to an unmistakable murder confession at their own trial?

If there are any doubts about Leo Frank’s August 18, 1913 murder trial confession, consider reading the March 9, 1914, Atlanta Constitution publishing a jailhouse interview of Leo Frank, in which he reconfirms his trial testimony about a Metal Room bathroom visit specifically responding to Monteen Stover’s testimony about his office being empty between 12:05 p.m. and 12:10 p.m. on Saturday, April 26, 1913.

The solving of the Mary Phagan murder mystery is found in the fact that Leo Frank made the equivalent of public murder confession at his trial on August 18, 1913, between 2:15 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. and it is documented in the official Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913, and the Georgia Supreme Court Case File on Leo Frank, 1913, 1914. Every appellate tribunal called to review the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence from 1913 to 1915, 1982 to 1986 did not disturb the unanimous verdict of the judge and jury originally made in August of 1913. One may also read between the lines of appeasement concerning the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) sponsored Leo M. Frank posthumous pardon – without exoneration – issued on March 11, 1986.

Revisionist journalist-author Steve Oney weaves together a fantastic collage of unsubstantiated Leo Frank hoaxes throughout his entire book ‘And the Dead Shall Rise’ (2003), as part of his shameless efforts to re-write history, exonerate Leo Frank of the Mary Phagan murder, and ultimately rehabilitate the image of Leo Frank from a perverted and violent pedophile, rapist and strangler, toward a more kinder and gentler mythological stoic-martyr who was unjustly scapegoated in a vast conspiracy.

By cherry picking and misrepresenting enough parts of the case, the subtext of Oney’s book is that an innocent and well educated Ivy-League Jew named Leo Frank was ensnared by the real culprit, a semi-literate and drunken stumble bum, the African-American factory sweeper Jim Conley.

Oney downplays the fact that Leo Frank and Jim Conley had a personal relationship that was a bit too close for comfort. Leo Frank would often goose and jolly with James “Jim” Conley at the factory. Leo Frank also managed Jim’s contracts as Conley had a side business selling watches at the NPCo factory and even ripped off Mr. Arthur Pride who testified about it at the trial. In September 10, 1912, even though Jim Conley served a one month sentence for drunken disorderly behavior, Leo Frank took him back at the National Pencil Company in mid October.

Leo Frank knew for a fact Jim Conley could write, but kept this information in confidence until it was too late. Leo Frank never said a single word about Conley to the police during the early days of the Mary Phagan murder investigation, even though the “death notes” were clearly written in Ebonics, and there were only 8 African-American employees out of 170 employees in total working at the National Pencil Company factory. Jim Conley worked at the National Pencil Company in various capacities for 2 years and had even done some written inventory work for Leo Frank.

Steve Oney never addresses why Leo Frank knowingly refused to tell the police Jim Conley could write.

What Steve Oney fails to elaborate fully for the reader is the most grotesque subplot of the bludgeoning, rape and strangulation of Mary Phagan and its pinning on the African-American Nightwatchman Newton “Newt” Lee who was ordered by Leo Frank on Friday, April 25 to arrive at work an hour early, 4:00 pm on the infamous April 26, 1913 so Leo Frank could go to the ballgame with his brother-in-law Mr. Ursenbach.

Oney points out in his book that weeks after Leo Frank and Jim Conley were arrested, the police arranged for them to confront each other face to face over the murder. Jim agreed, but Leo refused. Oney never answers the question why an “innocent” white man would refuse to confront an African-American man, accusing him of strangling a 13-year old white girl in the context of the white racial separatist south of 1913, where the word of a black man would never be taken over the word of a white man.

Though Steve Oney claims he spent 17 years of his life traveling the country to research and write this colorful and thesaurus-enriched book, his analysis is mostly shallow and myopic at best. Steve Oney tends to wear horse blinders and drives with the emergency brakes on during his epic 700+ page journey, and as a result, he does not plumb the depths of the case, or soar above it’s centenarian heights like a lucid and dispassionate researcher, looking back on the case 9 decades later with new penetrating eyes. Oney never explores any of the permutations or possible real solutions to the crime, making his book a complete waste of time. Oney never answers the myriad of the case’s questions either, leaving the reader truly frustrated, unsatisfied and unfulfilled. No real modern forensic analysis is applied to this case by Oney despite the hundreds of pages surviving into the 21st century with crime scene and autopsy descriptions by police, detectives, undertakers and physicians, respectively, turning this book into nothing more than a long winded journalists diatribe that is lost in a labyrinth of Leo Frank partisanship.

As a tabloid style journalist-author who should be writing for the ‘National Enquirer’, Steve Oney fills his book with every erroneous “fact” and fabricated piece of “evidence” on behalf of Leo Frank’s defense, regardless of whether or not the inclusions stand up to even minimal scrutiny.

One of the biggest frauds Steve Oney perpetuates within his book, like many other Leo Frank partisan authors, was originally fabricated by the tabloid-style journalist Pierre van Paassen in his book, ‘To Number Our Days’, published in 1964. In this 404 page work, Pierre van Paassen spends less than 2 pages (p. 237-8) recalling 42 years earlier an incident that happened in 1922, at a time when he was in Atlanta, Georgia, working as a journalist for the Atlanta Constitution, and investigating the Leo Frank Case.

‘To Number Our Days’, by Pierre van Paassen, Chapter: Short Stand in Dixieland, Page 237, Line 27:

“The Jewish community of Atlanta at that time seemed to live under a cloud. Several years previously one of its members, Leo Frank, had been lynched as he was being transferred from the Fulton Tower Prison in Atlanta to Milledgeville for trial on a charge of having raped and murdered a little girl in his warehouse which stood right opposite the Constitution building. Many Jewish citizens who recalled the lynching were unanimous in assuring me that Frank was innocent of the crime.

I took reading all the evidence pro and con in the record department at the courthouse. Before long I came upon an envelope containing a sheaf of papers and a number of X-ray photographs showing teeth indentures. The murdered girl had been bitten on the left shoulder and neck before being strangled. But the X-ray photos of the teeth marks on her body did not correspond with Leo Frank’s set of teeth of which several photos were included. If those photos had been published at the time of the murder, as they should have been, the lynching would probably not have taken place.

Though, as I said, the man died several years before, it was too late, I thought, to rehabilitate his memory and perhaps restore the good name of his family. I showed Clark Howell the evidence establishing Frank’s innocence and asked permission to run a series of articles dealing with the case and especially with the evidence just uncovered. Mr. Howell immediately concurred, but the most prominent Jewish lawyer in the city, Mr. Harry Alexander, whom I consulted with a view to have him present the evidence to the grand jury, demurred. He said Frank had not even been tried. Hence no new trial could be requested. Moreover, the Jewish community in its entirety still felt nervous about the incident. If I wrote the articles, old resentments might be stirred up and, who knows some of the unknown lynchers might recognize themselves as participants in my description of the lynching. It was better, Mr. Alexander thought, to leave sleeping lions alone. Some local rabbis were drawn into the discussion and they actually pleaded with Clark Howell to stop me from reviving interest in the Frank case as this was bound to have evil repercussions on the Jewish community.

That someone had blabbed out of school became quite evident when I received a printed warning saying: “Lay off the Frank case if you want to keep healthy.” The unsigned warning was reinforced one night, or rather, early one morning when I was driving home. A large automobile drove up alongside of me and forced me into the track of a fast-moving streetcar coming from the opposite direction. My car was demolished, but I escaped without a scratch…. ”

Source: To Number Our Days (1964), By Pierre van Paassen. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 64-13633. 404 Pages, see p. 237/8.

A recollection about an event that happened more than 4 decades ago provides the first question concerning its veracity. Dental x-ray forensics were in their infancy in 1913, and never used in Georgia for any murder case until countless years after Leo Frank was hanged in Marietta, GA, and buried in Queens, NY, in 1915. Is it “Mr. Harry Alexander” or Henry Alexander? And why would the attorney who represented Leo Frank during his numerous appeals say Leo Frank didn’t have his murder trial yet? Leo Frank was not lynched on the way to Milledgeville for trial or prison in late June 1915, he was lynched 170 miles away in Marietta on August 17, 1915. Bite marks on Mary Phagan’s left shoulder and neck?! None of the numerous examinations or autopsies of Mary Phagan conducted by the undertaker, police, detectives and physicians reported in the official record and newspapers mention any bite marks on Mary Phagan’s shoulder, neck or anywhere else on her body. This journalist claims an attempted murder was made on his life while he was driving his car and forced into a head on collision and his car was demolished, but he escaped without a scratch in 1922 when there were virtually no safety features in a car by modern standards.

From beginning to end, Steve Oney’s tome about the Leo Frank case is filled with shameless misrepresentations, fabrications, half-truths, omissions and sloppy research. Oney isn’t fooling people who studied the Leo Frank case when he pretends to be neutral and unbiased in his book.

The definitive book on the Leo Frank case has not been written yet, we are all still waiting for someone to write and publish it. Perhaps it’s time for Steve Oney to re-read and carefully study the 1,800 page Georgia Supreme Court File on Leo M. Frank, and put out a new edition of his book without all the easily verified misrepresentations, fabrications, half-truths, omissions and sloppy research.

Fair Usage Law

April 29, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, David Duke, Holocaust Denial, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, William Luther Pierce, Zionism  Comments Closed

This Day in Jewish American History April 26, 1913, Leo Frank bludgeoned, Raped and Strangled 13-year old Mary Phagan

Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday April 26, 1913, in the National Pencil Company factory of Atlanta, Georgia, 99 years ago today (2012), 29-year old Leo Frank violently beat, raped and strangled 13-year old Mary Phagan. Leo Frank offered $200 to his African-American janitor, Jim Conley, to drag Phagan 150 feet face down across the hard dirt floor of the factory basement and incinerate her body in the furnace, but he refused to cremate her body.

American State Trials Volume 10 (1918) by John D. Lawson, LL.D.

Beginning on page 182, an interpretation of the Leo M. Frank case by John D. Lawson is featured and then followed by an abridged version of the 1913 Leo Frank trial testimony (July 28, 1913 to August 21, 1913).

Leo Frank was charged with the April 26, 1913, murder of little Mary Phagan (If you would like to read the unabridged version of the Leo Frank trial testimony, visit: download the more complete 1913 Brief of Evidence from www.Archive.org).

After the extensively abridged Leo Frank trial testimony is republished in this work, the elusive closing arguments (August 21 to 25, 1913) of State’s Prosecution Lawyers Hugh M. Dorsey and Mr. Frank Arthur Hooper, and Leo Frank Defense Team Attorneys Reuben Rose Arnold and Luther Zeigler Rosser are featured. No other source known to exist, except for the local newspapers at the time, published the closing arguments of the 1913 Leo M. Frank trial. The 4 closing arguments are required reading.

The Jury unanimously convicted Leo M. Frank and sentenced him to death on August 25, 1913. The presiding Judge Leonard Strickland Roan agreeing with the verdict and death sentence, affirmed them both, with the sentencing added in the official record. After a failed appeal for a new trial, Judge Leonard Strickland Roan sentences Leo Frank to hang on his own 30th birthday, April 17, 1914.

The chronology of post trial conviction appeals (August 27, 1913 to April 1915) is highlighted with some commentary, however if you want to read the 1,800 pages of legal documents detailing the criminal activity of the Leo Frank defense team, you will need download the Leo M. Frank Georgia Supreme Court case documents and the response of Hugh M. Dorsey to the criminal conspiracy that occurred during the appeals process, available on www.LeoFrank.org.

The major pivotal event at the conclusion of the 2 years of failed appeals was the controversial commutation of Leo Frank’s death sentence to life in prison on June 21, 1915, by one of his attorneys closest business associate, the outgoing and corrupt Governor John M. Slaton, who was a senior law partner and part owner of the law firm representing Leo Frank at his 1913 murder trial.

July 17, 1915

At the Milledgeville Prison Farm, William Creen, a fellow prison inmate “shanked” Leo Frank with a seven inch butcher knife. Leo Frank barely survived the attack.

August 17, 1915

Finally a very detailed account of the events leading up to the abduction of Leo Frank from prison on the evening of August 16, 1915 and his lynching the morning of August 17, 1915 is provided.

Politics and Tensions

What makes this nationally followed and sensational murder trial so unlikely, is it would be the first time in U.S. history, in a Black-White racially segregated South, the testimony of two African-Americans, Jim Conley and Newt Lee, would become an integral part of the overall collective testimony and evidence presented to an all white Jury, which would help successfully convict a White man (Leo Frank) on August 25th 1913.

Leo Frank’s personal cook Minola McKnight

And though African-American Minola McKnight would later deny her shocking June 3rd 1913 affidavit, State’s Exhibit J, the half-hearted repudiation would not be believed when all things were considered and thus Minola McKnight, would become the 3rd African-American whose evidence at the trial would help build the case against Leo Frank.

What is State’s Exhibit J?

State’s Exhibit J, is about conversations Minola McKnight had with Lucille Selig Frank about what transpired on the late evening of April 26, 1913. It was then a drunk, remorseful and suicidal Leo Frank confessed to his wife in a roundabout way to murdering Mary Phagan in an unmistakeable way. Leo Frank broke down and told Lucille S. Frank he didn’t understand why he would murder. Leo Frank then asked Lucille Selig Frank to get his pistol so he could shoot himself.

Star Witness

Though, ultimately the most important witness testimony at the trial did not come from the African-American janitor Jim Conley or the African-American Nightwatchman Newt Lee, but from a Goldilocks 14 year old White girl named Monteen Stover, she broke Leo Frank’s alibi wide open.

The following Saturday after the murder of Mary Phagan, Monteen Stover had come to collect her pay envelope at the factory, she was unable to get it the Saturday before, because Leo M. Frank was not there at the normal prescribed time people come to pick up their pay envelopes on Saturdays. For Monteen Stover this time was 12:05 to 12:10 PM, April 26, 1913.

With this new information provided by Monteen Stover, police approached an oblivious Leo Frank and asked him about where he was that afternoon from noon onward.

Leo Frank specifically told police officer John R. Black and Pinkerton detective Harry Scott that he was in his second floor office at the factory every single minute from noon to 12:45.

To compound problems for Leo Frank, after being sworn under oath, he told the Coroners Inquest Jury, he did not use the bathroom at all on April 26, 1913, leaving the Coroner Paul Donehoo and his Jury of six men incredulous as would be expected.

Monteen Stover Character Witness

What made matters ironic is Monteen Stover liked Leo Frank, tending to be a character defense witness for Leo Frank, by countering the numerous pedophilia allegations from former employees of the closed-down pencil factory. More than a bakers dozen of pre-teen and teenage girls who worked in various positions as child laborers at the sweatshop-like National Pencil Company testified Leo Frank made unmistakeable and aggressive sexual, pedophile and lascivious innuendos towards them. The defense refused to cross examine them.

Leo Frank was not in his office from 12:05 to 12:10 PM on April 26, 1913

Monteen Stover testified to the fact of Leo Frank not being in either his inner or outer second floor office between 12:05 and 12:10 on April 26th 1913. Monteen Stover said when she had arrived in Leo Frank’s office, she looked around for Leo Frank and waited in his second floor office for 5 minutes from 12:05 to 12:10 PM, because she wanted to collect her weekly pay due to her on Saturday (No one ever disputed this fact at the trial or appeals, not even the defense lawyers).

When Monteen Stover couldn’t find Leo Frank, she then looked down the hall from Leo Frank’s second floor office, directly at the glass door to the metal room, describing it as being closed shut and she left at 12:10PM, because she thought the factory was deserted. When asked how she knew what time it was, she answered the clock on the wall.

Monteen Stover’s testimony left people presuming Leo Frank was in the metal room between 12:05 and 12:10 PM and that he was strangling Mary Phagan. Leo Frank would later accidentally affirm it, at his murder trial on August 18, 1913, with what amounted to an unmistakeable virtual murder confession.

The Leo Frank Virtual Murder Confession, August 18, 1913

It was on August 18th 1913, Leo Frank mounted the witness stand at 2:15PM at his trial and would counter the specific testimony given by Monteen Stover (about Leo Frank not being in his office from 12:05 to 12:10), with a most shocking, mind boggling blunder, an admission inescapably entrapping himself and considered to be the equivalent to a murder confession.

“Unconsciously” Going to the Bathroom in the Metal Room

In response to Monteen Stover, Leo Frank testified he may have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom to use the toilet or to urinate to account for his lapse of unaccountable time in his empty office between 12:05 to 12:10 PM. This testimony was so grossly incriminating because in order to get to the bathroom, one has to physically walk into and through the second floor metal room where the bathroom is located inside. There was no other bathroom on the second floor, but the one in the metal room.

The State’s prosecution team led by Hugh Dorsey spent nearly 4 weeks in total, during the longest criminal trial in Southern history at the time, building it’s entire case and successfully convincing the Judge and Jury, that Leo M. Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the second floor metal room between 12:05 and 12:10 PM on Confederate Memorial Day, April 26th 1913.

The 12:05 to 12:10 PM murder time frame was decided upon because, it was this exact time range given by Leo Frank on Monday, April 29, 1913, when he said Mary Phagan had come into his office on April 26, 1913. The statement was entered as evidence called State’s Exhibit B.

Leo Frank’s August 18, 1913, statement about his “unconscious” bathroom visit amounted to a virtual murder confession, not only because the only bathroom on the second floor was in the metal room, but also because of the time frame. State’s Prosecution Attorneys Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey and Frank Arthur Hooper would articulate the virtual murder confession in their closing arguments August 21, 22, 23, and 25, 1913. However they tried to give every piece of evidence equal weight in their arguments, not putting too much emphasis on each point, rather they acted as if each one were a thread, bound together with many threads to make an invincible hangman’s noose (See: Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey, 1913).

The August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession was the first time in Southern U.S. history, that the prime suspect indicted for murder made a virtual confession at their own capital murder trial. People are still flabbergasted by it today.

The August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession ensured a total shutout and victory for the prosecution.

The Jury, August 25, 1913

With less than 4 hours of deliberation, the Jury had arrived at it’s unanimous decision of guilt without a recommendation of mercy (they unanimously voted for the execution of Leo Frank by hanging).

The Presiding Judge Leonard Stickland Roan

On August 26, 1913, Judge Leonard Stickland Roan agreeing with the conviction, affirmed it and sentenced Leo Frank to death. Judge Leonard Stickland Roan was so convinced of Leo Frank’s guilt, he eventually sentenced him to die on his 30th birthday, April 17, 1914.

Leo Frank Appeals (1913 to 1915)

Two embarrassing years of failed appeals occurred at the State and Federal Court Systems, because it was found out the Leo M. Frank defense team was criminally manufacturing affidavits and bribing people to false swear to lies. In May of 1915, Leo Frank had one last hope, and appealed to the unscrupulous Governor of Georgia, who was part owner of the law firm originally representing Leo Frank at the infamous murder trial.

When Georgian Governor John M. Slaton, commuted his client Leo Franks death sentence to life in prison on June 21st 1915, there was public outrage at the perceived gross conflict of interest. Most people believed John M. Slaton was disqualified from being legitimately qualified to make an impartial decision in terms of whether or not to give Leo Frank clemency against the wishes of the Judge, trial Jury and two years of majority decisions at every level of the United States Appellate System.

Betrayal of the Oath to the Constitution of the United States of America

Southerners raged indignantly, because Governor John M. Slaton on the last page of his commutation order said he was sustaining the Jury and Appellate Tribunals. What also made matters hard to swallow is Governor John M. Slaton completely disregarded the sworn trial testimony of Newt Lee, Harry Scott, Monteen Stover, Jim Conley, Leo Frank and 19 girls whose testimony incriminated Leo Frank. Governor John M. Slaton was a part owner and senior partner of the lawfirm, ‘Rosser, Brandon, Slaton and Phillips’, the same lawfirm that represented Leo Frank during his trial and State appeals.

Mob Violence

Immediately after the commutation of Leo Frank, a demonstration of 1,200 people marched on John M. Slaton’s home, and in a terrified response, the armed national guard not been called in to disperse the crowd. Their was fear John Slaton would have been lynched and the inside of his palatial mansion torched to the ground.

Leo Frank Transferred

After the John M. Slaton clemency scandal Leo Frank was secretly whisked far away to Milledgeville, Georgia, a minimum security work farm nearly 150 miles from Atlanta.

On July 17, 1915, an inmate shanked Leo Frank, slashing his throat with a 7 inch butcher knife. Leo Frank barely survived and his wounds were slow to heal in the hot and humid Georgia summer of 1915, and one month later Leo Frank would meet his verdict by a group of prominent Southern vigilantes.

A well organized lynch party came together in critical mass immediately after the Leo Frank commutation order of June 21, 1915, it was a group of elite men that donned itself “The Knights of Mary Phagan”, formed by the leadership of the “good ole boys”, Georgia’s most prominent members of society and the upper crust of Marietta citizenry.

Nearly two months after the June 21, 1915, commutation, the lynch party launched one of the most audacious prison breaks in US history, in an unprecedented commando style raid unleashed with military precision, they seized and abducted Leo Frank from the Milledgeville prison on August 16, 1915 at 11PM. The abduction was so well executed it was achieved without a single shot being fired.

The lynch party made up of several dozen men drove Leo Frank 150 miles from Milledgeville all through the night in a tail gating party conga line, of slow rolling model-T fords at approximately 18 miles an hour. The caravan of lynch party members delivered Leo Frank to his final destination at Frey’s Gin (1200 Roswell Road, Marietta, Ga), the preplanned place Leo Frank was to be hanged. The execution site was a location in the close relative vicinity of where Mary had once lived and was buried.

A 3/4″ manila rope was prepped into a hang mans noose, it was thrown over a sturdy oak tree branch the thickness of a mans thy and the loop was placed snugly around Leo Frank’s neck like a thread through the head of a needle. Leo Frank was carefully hoisted onto a small table by 4 men, 2 on either side of him meant to hold him steady. With the noose securely snug around Leo Frank’s neck the other end of the rope was tied off to a nearby tree with slack, the sentence of the Jury was read by a former Judge and the table was kicked away.

In a normal hanging, the person falls through a trap door and their neck is broken, in this case, Leo Frank did not have enough room to fall when the table was kicked away and as a result he was strangled in midair, dying the same way Mary Phagan died.

Leo Frank was properly lynched on the morning of August 17th, 1915 at 7:17AM for the bludgeon, rape and strangulation of 13 year old Mary Anne Phagan (1899 to 1913).

Leo Frank was president of the elite Jewish Fraternal organization B’nai B’rith, his August 1913 conviction became part of the impetus for the creation of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith in October 1913. The Anti-Defamation League is a Jewish spy and espionage organization that subverts US Laws and works to destroy European-American hegemony in Western Civilization. The ADL blindly supports a racist, discriminatory, terrorist Israel that commits the worst civil rights abuses against Palestinians.

More excellent books and reading on the subject include:

0. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913 – The first neutral book written on the subject. Very interesting read.

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (Available here on www.Archive.org). Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events surrounding the trial of Leo Frank. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is well worth reading and it is a refreshing change from the endless number of Jewish and contemporary books turning the Leo Frank case into a neurotic race obsessed tabloid controversy.

2. American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson (Available here on www.Archive.org) Tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team, this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some important things said and details when it republishes parts of the trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the 1913 murder trial brief of evidence found on www.archive.org and you can see what was left out.

3. Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank (Available here on www.archive.org). Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this books. This is an excellent book and required reading to see how Dorsey in sales vernacular ‘closed’ a Jury of 12 men and Judge Roan.

4. Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of Evidence. Extremely rare, only 1 copy exists, and it is at the Georgia State Archive. (available on archive.org)

5., 6., 7., The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta Journal, The Atlanta Georgian, April 28th to August 27th 1913.

Watson’s Magazine 1915

8. Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian and Watson’s Magazine: Watson’s Magazine, January 1915, Watson’s Magazine, March 1915; Watson’s Magazine, August 1915, Watson’s Magazine, September 1915, and Watson’s Magazine, October of 1915. (Available here on www.Archive.org). Tom Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank case was published in September 1915. Watson’s five works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with superb reasoning.

These five works are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Tom Watson’s magazine publications surged from 30,000 to 100,000 copies, when it was announced he would be writing on the Leo Frank case. These magazines are extremely rare and very difficult to find. However they have been scanned and are available on www.Archive.org

1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

Though Tom Watson is considered a controversial figure by some, when one puts the rhetoric aside, his writings on the Leo Frank case are lucid, making a very complicated trial easy to understand.

Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper

9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson

Tom W. Brown, Grandson of Thomas Edward Watson

10. Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank, By Tom Watson Brown, Emery University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982.

Leo Frank Archive

11. The Leo Frank Archive: http://www.LeoFrank.org

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Holocaust, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Race Relations, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

April 17, This Day in Jewish History: Leo Frank was Born in 1884

The Murder of Little Mary Phagan written by Mary Phagan Kean, Publisher: New Horizon Press; 1st edition (September 15, 1989).

The book, ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ authored by Mary Phagan Kean (b. 1953), the great grand niece of little Mary Phagan (June 1, 1899 to April 26, 1913) is perhaps the most even-handed book written in the last one hundred years about the controversial subject and its contentious aftermath.
This exceptional book ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ details one of the most infamous crimes of the early 20th century.
The discovery of a dead girl who had been violently battered, raped and strangled launched an investigation that began at 3:24 AM on April 27, 1913, when the Nightwatchman (“night witch”) Newt Lee called the Atlanta police, and reached call officer W.F. Anderson and reported the discovery of a murdered White girl in the factory basement of the National Pencil Company.
56 hours after the discovery of Mary Phagan’s dead body on April 27, Leo Frank was arrested on April 28, 1913 at 11:30 AM, it would be his last day of freedom and the beginning of a legal battle that would come to a controversial and tragic end more than 2 years later.
The Most Major Breakthrough In the Mary Phagan Murder Investigation
On Saturday May 3, 1913, the Mary Phagan murder investigation would reach a major milestone, when detectives accidentally stumbled upon one of the child laborer employees who had formerly worked at the National Pencil Company. The girls name was Monteen Stover, and she was at the NPCo to collect her pay envelope for a second time, because she had failed the first time on Confederate Memorial Day.
When police thoroughly questioned Monteen Stover she revealed something very interesting, she said Leo Frank was not in his office Saturday, April 26, 1913, when she arrived to get her pay envelope. More chronologically specific she said Leo Frank’s office was empty when she waited inside from 12:05 PM to 12:10 PM on Saturday, April 26, 1913.
Without Leo Frank knowing the police had discovered and questioned 14-year old Monteen Stover, Detectives John R. Black and Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott, approached Leo Frank in his jailcell and asked him if he had been in his office every minute from noon to 12:45PM, and Leo Frank responded an affirmative ‘Yes’. Leo Frank would maintain stoically up until his trial that he never left his office from noon to 12:45 pm on April 26, 1913.
As far as the police were concerned, the alibi of Leo Frank had possibly just been cracked wide open by Monteen Stover.
At his murder trial, Leo Frank would directly respond to Monteen Stover’s claim about his office being empty and change his original alibi he maintained for 3.5 months to explain the reason why his office was empty on Saturday, April 26, 1913, between 12:05pm and 12:10pm, and in doing so he gave away the solution to who killed Mary Phagan.
Unique Trial Analysis
Mary Phagan Kean offers a uniquely neutral analysis of the month long capital murder trial which began on July 28, and led to the August 25, 1913, murder conviction of Leo Max Frank, by a jury of 12 White men, who recommended a sentence “without mercy”. Following the conviction it was affirmed the next day by the presiding Judge, the Honorable Leonard Strickland Roan on August 26, 1913. Judge Leonard S. Roan sentenced Leo Frank to death by hanging at the request of the jury.
The book also highlights Leo Frank’s subsequent failed post-conviction appeals from August 27, 1913 to April, 1915, and his eventual death sentence commutation by then Governor John M. Slaton, on June 21, 1915. Which led to a mob of 1200 people forming at the Governor’s mansion. Rarely ever mentioned in connection with Leo Frank’s commutation is the fact Governor John M. Slaton was part owner of the lawfirm that represented Leo Frank at his trial and appeals. The lawfirm was called Rosser, Brandon, ‘Slaton’ and Phillips (the ‘Slaton’ was Governor John M. Slaton). Slaton had essentially commuted the death sentence of his own client.
Leo Frank had his throat slashed on July 17, 1915, by a fellow inmate named William Creen.
On August 16, 1915, Leo Frank was abducted from prison in a military commando style raid by elite citizens from Marietta, Georgia, and lynched at sunrise on August 17, 1913, at Frey’s Gin.
Nearly 70 years after the lynching of Leo Frank, pressure and backroom dealing by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith, individual associated Jews and other Jewish organizations, resulted in a highly political posthumous pardon without criminal exoneration for Leo Frank on March 11, 1986.
The Leo Frank case continues to capture the imagination of the public, more than 100 years after his conviction and Mary Phagan Kean offers the best and most neutral overview of the case.
Brief Biography of Leo Frank
Leo Frank was born in Cuero (also known as Paris), Texas on April 17, 1884. His family moved 3 months later to Brooklyn, NY, where Leo Frank was raised and educated in the NYC public school system. After doing college prep work at the Pratt Institute of Brooklyn, Leo Frank matriculated into the Ivy League Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. At Cornell, Leo Frank began studying Mechanical Engineering during his first semester in the fall semester of 1902.
1905
During the summer break of 1905, between his Junior and Senior year at college, Leo Frank went with his wealthy uncle Moses Frank on a sojourn to Europe, spending the summer traveling extensively and visiting extended family.
1906
In the fall of 1905 Leo Frank began his senior year of college. And after graduating in June, 1906, with a degree in Mechanical Engineering, Leo Frank bounced around from one job to another, until he visited Atlanta, Georgia, in the fall of 1907 and met again with his rich uncle Moses Frank to discuss a potentially lucrative business venture manufacturing pencils. An item in high demand at the time.
After visiting Atlanta for two weeks, Leo Frank made a very serious life changing decision and decided he wanted to participate in his wealthy uncle Moe’s manufacturing venture. To fulfill this promise, Leo Frank would again go on a sojourn overseas to study with Eberhard-Faber in Germany. Leo Frank left NYC in November 7, 1907, ocean bound for Europe. Once Leo Frank arrived in Bavaria he began studying pencil manufacturing. After his 9 month engineering apprenticeship, Leo Frank returned to NYC, August 1, 1908, on the USS Amerika, and then briefly stopped at his home in Brooklyn to visit his family for a few days. On August 4, 1913, Leo Frank embarked on a South bound train from Penn Station in Manhattan with his luggage and made a permanent move to Georgia. Frank arrived at Terminal Station in Atlanta on August 6, 1908, starting a new life in the Heart of the South.
On Monday, August 10th, 1908, Leo Frank started work in a new career at the National Pencil Company at 37 to 41 South Forsyth Street.
1910
Two years later on November 30, 1910, Leo Frank married into a wealthy and established German-Jewish family (Selig-Cohen), a family that founded the first synagogue in Atlanta two generations prior to Leo’s arrival. Leo Frank was very actively involved with Jewish philanthropy and upper-crust society.
Though Frank was from Brooklyn he became a rising star in the Southern Jewish community, he was elected B’nai B’rith President of Atlanta in 1912, by the 500 member Jewish fraternal lodge and he was re-elected in 1913. By 1913, with nearly 5 years of experience in pencil manufacturing, Leo Frank had reached the pinnacle of his career at the National Pencil Company, running the factory as general superintendent.
1913
The National Pencil Co. headquarters was located on 37 to 41 South Forsyth Street, near the corner of Hunter Street, it was there Thirteen year old Mary Phagan, an employee of Leo Frank, had begun working there in the early Spring of 1912, or about a little more than a year (13 months) before she was murdered. Mary Phagan worked 150 feet down the hall from Leo Frank’s office on the 2nd floor, where she participated in the final and finishing production stages of the pencil manufacturing process. Mary Phagan worked in the metal department known by factory employees as the “metal room”, in a section called the tipping department. Using a knurling machine, Phagan’s job was inserting little rubber erasers into the empty brass metal bands that were attached to the ends of the pencils.
The metal department, where Mary Phagan worked contained within it the only bathroom on the second floor, it was located in the North East corner next to the lady’s dressing room.
Forensic Evidence Discovered, Monday, April 28, 1913
It was the metal room, where a 5 inch wide blood stain, was found on the floor, and bloody hair, was found on the steel handle of a lathe. The discovery was made Monday morning, at 6:30 AM, on April 28, 1913, was by an early bird employee named Robert P. Barret, starting the work week. Word of Mary Phagan’s death, had already reached all of Atlanta, when a newspaper “Extra”, published by the Atlanta Constitution, at the behest of Britt Craig, was released on Sunday, April 27, 1913, just hours after the normal Sunday morning edition appeared.
Once the word got out, about the discovery of the forensic evidence, (hair and blood) in the metal room, word traveled fast, employees of the whole factory, who were already in emotional hysterics, would flock to the metal room, gawking at these unusual blood stains on the floor, and a tress of 6 to 8 hairs with dry blood on them, broken off, stuck and wound on the handle of the lathe machine, of Robert P. Barret. A number of employees recognized the hair as Mary Phagan’s, and testified to that effect at the Leo Frank trial.
A white powder known as haskolene — a machine “lubricant” — was found suspiciously smeared and rubbed into the fresh blood stains on the metal room floor, which were located conspicuously in front of the girls dressing room, the smearing appeared to be an attempt to cover up the bloody evidence, but the blood bled through the white powder, turning the red blood stain, variations of white, pink and dark blood red. The blood stain also had a star burst pattern, behind it, indicating how it came into contact with the floor.
Botched Crime Scene Clean-up Job
The poorly conducted “clean-up job”, gave the appearance, to be a failed attempt to hide the blood stains, near where the murder victim, it was later revealed, Phagan was found by Jim Conley.
Little Mary Phagan’s Life (1899 to 1913):
The 55 hour work week Mary Phagan performed at the pencil factory for about 7.5 cents an hour (actually 7 and 4/11 cents an hour), was her small way of helping support her five siblings, and widowed mother (who remarried a cotton mill worker named Mr. John William Coleman in 1912). Mary Phagan’s step father knew Mary and her family quite well for about 4 years before Marrying into the Phagan family. Mr. Coleman identified the hair found on the lathe machine as belonging to Mary Phagan, as did several other employees who worked in the metal room.
Temporarily Layoff
The week before Phagan’s murder, a shortage of brass sheet supplies at the factory had led to a reduction in her work hours and she was temporarily laid off until the brass sheet metal could be replenished. Her wages for the shortened work week came to just $1.20, or just 7.5 cents an hour, for the 16 hours she had worked the previous Friday April 18, (11 hours), and Saturday, April 19, (5 hours) prior to her being murdered on Saturday, April 26, 1913.
Confederate Memorial Day
On April 26, 1913, a State Holiday, celebrated locally as Confederate Memorial Day, Mary came to the factory at minutes after highnoon, to claim her pay, before she intended on going to see the Confederate Memorial Day Parade with some of her friends and neighbor / co-worker like George W. Epps at the location of Elkins-Watson place around 2:00 pm.
Mary Phagan never arrived at 2:00PM as promised, George W. Epps stuck around for 2 hours and then left at 4:00PM.
Later in the evening George W. Epps ran over to Mary Phagan’s residence, which was right around the corner from his home, to find out why Mary Phagan had stood him up. Mary Phagan’s family was already in a state of panic and distressed over Mary having gone missing that evening, but they also thought she might have gone to stay with a relative. Mary Phagan’s father, Mr. John W. Coleman, had looked for Mary at the Bijou theater, and discovered the Handsome Mr. NV Darley, Foreman at the National Pencil Company with a young girl named Opie Dickerson, who also worked at the National Pencil Company. Though Mr. Darley was married, the young girl he was squiring around was not his wife.
April 26, 1913, Noon
When Mary Phagan arrived at the factory at minutes after noon (12:01PM to 12:02PM), Mary’s pay was issued to her according to Leo Frank. Leo Frank was the last person to admit seeing Mary Phagan alive, in a shuttered and empty factory, but it turned out there were 4 people in the factory at the time of Phagan’s arrival, when the normal number was more than 170+ during a normal work day. It was the reason among others why Leo Frank became a suspect so early on when all things were considered, not because of media frenzies or anti-Semitism.
The First 48 Hours of the Mary Phagan Murder Investigation
George W. Epps made a startling deposition on Monday April 28, 1913, providing troubling testimony to the police, stating that Mary had told him in confidence, that Leo Frank scared her, and he often made lascivious sexual innuendos and inappropriate insinuations toward her. Epps said Leo Frank was “after her” in local parlance, and she was scared of him. According to George W. Epps, Mary Phagan told him that Leo Frank would run up in front of her, when she was trying to leave work, and during the work day he would pester her, and stare at her lecherously and then smile.
According to the Georgia Supreme Court Case file on Leo Frank, George Epps, after the Leo Frank murder trial, got kidnapped by Leo Frank’s cronies, was threatened with violence, and forced to recant his trial testimony ,by signing a false affidavit under duress. George Epps later signed a true affidavit, describing the intimate details of his being kidnapped and taken all the way to Alabama. The true affidavit described in details the dishonest trickery that unraveled when Epps was abducted and forced under duress to sign a pre-written affidavit that was filled with lies.
In The First 24 Hours of the Mary Phagan Murder, Sunday, April 27, 1913
In the early hours of Sunday, April 27, 1913, at around 3:24 AM in the morning, the Negro nightwatch (“night witch”) Newt Lee made a disturbing phone call to the Atlanta police. Newt Lee found Mary Phagans mangled body on a dirt, cinder and saw dust mound in front of the furnace in the rear of the basement at 3:20 AM, with what looked like a frilly strip or part of her petticoat wrapped around her neck and soaked with blood.
When Atlanta Police arrived they reported there was evidence she had been dragged by her arms face down from the elevator entry 140 feet to the furnace, before she was dumped there in front of the furnace. Phagan’s face was so scratched up, punctured, and covered with filth that at first the police were unsure if it were a white or black girl. They had to roll down a stocking from her knee to see she was White.
The autopsy would reveal she had been hit on the face around the right eye with a left fist, there was also a major gash on the back of her head. It was later determined the likely source of the head wound was when she was slammed against the handle of the lathe in the metal room, which left forensic evidence of her broken off bloodied hair, that was found on Monday morning, April 28, 1913, by Robert P. Barret.
The underwear of Mary Phagan was torn open across the vagina to the seam, she had the appearance of having been violently raped, with blood and discharge present on her underwear, her face was beaten black-and-blue, and sunk deep into her neck was the 7 foot cord she had been strangled with. One of the doctor who performed an autopsy testified under oath to several types of specific kinds of sexual violence, and internal vaginal damage, suggesting some kind of rape either penile or by fingers occurred before she was garotted.
Leo M. Frank, Factory Superintendent
The police after examining the body of Mary Phagan made several failed attempts at reaching Leo Frank on the phone in the early hours of April 27, 1913, but they did not have problems reaching other people. It would not be until the early morning after sunrise, the police would finally reach Leo Frank on the phone, they briefly spoke with him, and went directly to his home, the Selig residence on 68 East Georgia Ave, at around 7:00 AM in the morning.
When the detectives arrived at Leo Frank’s in-laws home, the door was answered by Mrs. Lucille Selig Frank, the wife of Leo Frank, the police asked if they could speak with Mr. Frank.
Lucy welcomed them into their home.
Like typical seasoned detectives, without telling Leo Frank why they were there and what it was all about, they observed Frank and asked him to come with them. Suspicion fell on Leo Frank, because he appeared to be extremely nervous, trembling, rubbing his hands, and ghastly pale. Police recalled Leo Frank appeared to be badly hung over, while he was bumbling, jimjamming and agitated. Leo Frank also gave overly detailed and meticulous answers on very minor points, his voice was hoarse and trembling. Leo Frank fumbled and struggled with minor tasks like fixing his collar before leaving with the police. Moreover, Leo kept saying he hadn’t had breakfast and kept asking for a cup of coffee, as if trying to delay the the process of being taken to the Pencil Manufacturing Plant, where he was General Superintendent.
The police asked Leo Frank if he knew Mary Phagan, and Leo Frank denied knowing any Mary Phagan, saying he would need to check the accounting books he managed to be sure.
The significance of Leo Frank claiming to not know Mary Phagan become an important circumstance further into the investigation, because it was later determined, she had worked for more than a year on the same floor as Leo Frank, her work station was only a few feet away from the only bathroom on the second floor, the same bathroom Leo Frank visited daily during his 11 hour work days. Other employees testified Frank knew Mary Phagan quite well and on a first name basis, others suggested they saw Leo behave in that gray area between politeness and sexual harassment toward Phagan.
One incriminating fact against Leo Frank was that Mary Phagan had collected more than 50 pay envelopes from him during her year of employment and during that time she logged an impressive 2,750 hours of work under Leo Frank at the factory from the Spring 1912, to Monday, April 21, 1913 (when she was temporarily laid off).
I Don’t Know Mary Phagan
Leo Frank flat out got caught in a lie about whether or not he knew Mary Phagan, which damaged his credibility, and left people wondering why Leo was trying so hard to pretend not to know Mary.
Frame the Nightwatchman (“night witch”) Newt Lee
On Sunday, April 27, 1913, in the presence of the Atlanta police, Leo Frank said Newt Lee’s time card was punched correctly every half hour from 6:00pm on April 26, 1913 to 3:00 am on Sunday, April 27, 1913. However, on Monday, April 28, 1913, Leo Frank changed his story and told the Atlanta Police that Newt Lee did not punch his time card at 4 disparate intervals, creating several 1 hour periods of unaccounted for time. It put even greater suspicion on Newt Lee, because the old Negro lived about a half an hour away, and the intervals suggested he had enough time to go home and come back four times.
Intimations to Search Newt Lee’s Home
After making his Monday, April 28, 1913, deposition to Atlanta Police that became known as State’s Exhibit B, Leo Frank told the police to check his body and visit his home to look at the laundry. Leo Frank removed his shirt and the police found no visible scratchmarks on his body, and then accompanying the police to the Selig residence, Minola brought the dirty laundry basket and the clothes within it showed no blood stains. Given Leo Frank’s intimations about Newt Lee’s timecard, the natural thing for the Atlanta police to do next was search Newt Lee’s shack.
However, when the police searched Newt Lee’s home without a warrant (violating his constitutional rights), at the bottom of a garbage burn barrel, they found a bloody shirt. The shirt had blood stains high up on the armpits in the front, back and inside in such a way the police immediately thought it was forged and planted there intentionally. What also made detectives think the shirt might have been fabricated is because the shirt, aside from the blood, appeared clean and did not have the distinctive “negro funk” on it as they recalled when they took turns examining and sniffing it.
Newt Lee’s Blood Soaked Shirt
Three variables, the fresh minty clean shirt, with oddly placed blood smears, and no funky smell, gave the suggestion the shirt was a plant meant to incriminate Newt Lee. When the police questioned Newt Lee about the shirt, he said a white woman had given it to him 2 years ago and he hadn’t worn it since.
At that moment, the police began thinking, perhaps Leo Frank was trying to implicate Newt Lee, the murder notes with “night witch” (night watch), the time card contradiction and the planted shirt, were circumstances that began directing strong suspicion on Leo Frank in the minds of the Atlanta Police and detectives investigating the murder.
Leo Frank’s last full day of freedom was Monday, April 28, 1913, because on Tuesday April 29, 1913, at 11:30PM Leo Frank was arrested and would remain incarcerated until his violent ending two years later.
The African-American James “Jim” Conley
After arresting the factory sweeper Jim Conley on Thursday, May 1, 1913, and questioning him, it took three weeks of interrogation, to get from him the revelation that he was indeed present at work on the infamous Confederate Memorial Saturday.
The police cracked Conley using the 3rd degree method after weeks of failure and 3 half-truth affidavits. Atlanta’s finest finally got Conley to admit he was an accomplice after the fact to the strangulation murder of Mary Phagan. The police finally got the details out of Conley about how the body was discovered in the metal department bathroom and transported to the basement. They also were able to get an eye witness account of what Leo Frank was saying and doing during the the morning and afternoon of April 26, 1913.
Conley admitted he was asked by Leo Frank to move the body of Mary Phagan to the basement and ghost write four dictated “death notes” as if they were written by Mary Phagan, but in negro hand writing to draw suspicion to another negro. But only 2 of the murder notes were discovered scattered next to the head of Mary Phagan. It was thought the notes were put there by Leo Frank after James Conley refused to burn the body.
The murder notes were a very contrived attempt to make it appear as if a negro was trying to charade the notion Mary Phagan had written the “death notes” after she went to the bathroom in the metal room and was sexually assaulted by the nightwatchman (night witch) Newt Lee. The “death notes” where unmistakeably clear in their attempt to pin the crime and point guilt to the “long tall slim negro” night watchman Newt Lee (“night witch”), because the notes described him exactly, including his job title.
Looking back from the 21st century to 1913, the “death notes” cause many people to ask themselves, when or ever in history of the cosmos has a black man committed battery, rape, robbery and murder, and then stuck around to write literature, as if they were being written by the victim in the middle of the rape blaming another negro and then addressing the notes to Phagan’s mother describing what happened.
“I write while he plays”…
The Trial
There was some conflicting testimony about what Leo Frank said concerning a question Mary Phagan asked him (Leo Frank) at 12:02 pm or 12:03 PM on April 26, 1913. On Monday, April 28, 1913, Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott was told by Leo Frank that Mary Phagan asked him “Has the metal come in?”. Hired by the National Pencil Company, Harry Scott contradicted Leo Frank about the answer he had given to Mary Phagan, after she asked the question about her work. Scott told the jury, Leo Frank told her, “I Don’t Know”, creating three dimensional time and space of Leo and Mary walking to the metal room to find out.
The trial would make history, because it would be the first time in the United States of America, the testimony of two black man (Jim Conley & Newt Lee) would provide evidence in part leading to the conviction and death sentence of a white man (Leo Frank), by an all White jury, in the White racially consciousness, and segregated South (a place where Jews were treated as equals to Whites).
The Real Star Witness Emerges
However, the star witness was neither Newt Lee or Jim Conley, but a little 5’2″ tall and 14-year old White girl named Monteen Stover.
Star Witness Monteen Stover and the (THIRD) Leo Frank Murder Confession
Monteen Stover who liked Leo Frank had inadvertently cracked wide open his alibi. Leo Frank told the police for 3.5 months he never left his office on April 26, 1913, from twelve noon to 12:45pm. Monteen Stover had come to the factory to collect her pay envelope minutes after Mary Phagan had arrived, but she did not bump into Mary Phagan walking down the stairs and Leo Frank was not in either his inner or outer office, nor was Leo Frank aware that Monteen Stover had arrived and waited for him in his second floor office for five minutes between 12:05 pm to 12:10 PM. Frank would change his story about never leaving his office and respond to the testimony of Monteen Stover stating, he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the metalroom during this time.
Crescendo of the Leo Frank Murder Trial
Leo Frank entrapped himself beyond escape, because the only bathroom on the second floor was located within the metal room, it was the metal room where the murder evidence was found (bloody hair and blood stain) and the prosecution had successfully built a month long case that Leo Frank had murdered Mary Phagan on April 26, 1913 in the metal room between 12:05pm and 12:10pm.
To make matters even worse, Leo Frank had made a statement, known as State’s Exhibit B on Monday, April 28, 1913, where he said Mary Phagan had arrived into his office between 12:05PM and 12:10PM on April 26, 1913, but Frank’s office was empty according to Monteen Stover during that time when she came for her pay and Leo replied at the trial saying he might have been “unconsciously” inside the metal room’s bathroom.
Leo Frank had made what amounted to a murder confession at his own trial, it was the first time ever in Southern history.
Be sure to read the final closing statements of State’s prosecution team leader, the Solicitor General Hugh Dorsey and Assistant Solicitor Frank Hooper in American State Trials Volume X 1918, for their unique take on the Leo Frank murder trial admission. One should also read the really long winded closing arguments of Hugh Dorsey published in 1914 as ‘The Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey’.
Firebrand Tom E. Watson
Many would argue the best post trial analysis of the Leo Frank murder confession is articulated by the defense lawyer, and genius Tom Watson in his five booklets on the Leo Frank trial published in Watson’s Magazine, January, March, August, September and October of 1915, and his weekly Jeffersonian Newspaper in specific issues during the years of 1914, 1915, 1916, and 1917.
Appeals 1913 to 1915
Numerous half-baked appeal attempts were made by the Leo Frank Legal Defense Team to the Georgia Superior Court, Georgia Supreme Court, US Federal District Court, and United States Supreme Court, all appeals were denied after careful review, with lengthy decisions written and rendered (see: Leo Frank Appeals 1913, 1914, 1915).
Commutation June 21, 1915
The departing Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton, decided to commute the death sentence of his own client, Leo Frank, to life in prison on June 21, 1915, just days before the end of his last term as Governor. It was an act of political suicide, but it didn’t matter, as he was leaving office anyway, and he was likely rewarded handsomely behind the scenes in other ways.
The commutation caused a mob of 1200 people to storm the perimeter of Slaton’s mansion, but the local militia held the line. The mob formed to angrily protest the commutation, because it was a gross conflict of interest. Rarely ever mentioned by Leo Frank partisans is the connection between Leo Frank’s commutation and the fact Governor John M. Slaton was part owner of the lawfirm that represented Leo Frank at his trial and appeals. The lawfirm was called Rosser, Brandon, ‘Slaton’ and Phillips (the ‘Slaton’ was Governor John M. Slaton).
1915
The genius anti-Catholic / anti-Semite Tom Watson through his popular Jeffersonian publishing company in 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917, mocked Leo Frank calling him a Jewish sodomite and wrote five separate scathing reviews about the Leo Frank Case in January, March, August, September and October of 1915 issues of Watson’s Magazine (These 5 issues are available on Archive.org) and the Jeffersonian Newspaper 1914, 1915, 1916, and 1917. They are deliciously sarcastic and filled with energy, invective, seasoned wit and juicy lexicon.
Leo Frank Prison Shanking, July 17, 1915
One month after the commutation of Leo Frank got shanked in prison by a fellow inmate named William Creen, who used a 7 inch butcher knife on Leo’s tender throat. Leo Frank barely survived the attack, but thanks to two inmate doctors who came to his aid in the nick of time and stitched him up. The wound was a bit slow to heal in the hot and humid Milledgeville, GA, summer of 1915.
One month after the shanking and almost 2 months after Leo Frank received his controversial clemency, a well organized group of about 25 to 35 men, many of whom were from Georgia’s highest strata of politics, law and society, organized themselves into the ‘Knights of Mary Phagan’. This newly formed group of Georgia’s elites, sought to fulfill the conviction of the Jury and death sentence judgement ratified by Judge Leonard Strickland Roan. These elite men of the Knights of Mary Phagan wanted to deliver righteous retribution in the form of “Southern Style Vigilante Justice”.
After much careful planning, Leo Frank was kidnapped from the minimum security Milledgeville prison he was housed on the evening of August 16, 1915, driven all through the night and then lynched in the early hours of August 17, 1915, from an oak tree near the town of Marietta where Mary Phagan had formerly lived at one time.
Post Lynching, August 17, 1915
Once word got out, Leo Frank’s dangling body became a public spectacle, photographs were taken and the pictures of Leo Franks lifeless suspended body, gently twirling in the breeze became popular post cards and pieces of his shirt transformed into memorabilia.
How the Most Definitive Book on the Leo Frank Case was Born
The book ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ is written by the namesake of the murder victim, Mary Phagan’s great niece named Mary Phagan Kean. When Mary Phagan Kean was 13 years old, she discovered her given name was no mere accident or coincidence. When people heard Mary Phagan Kean’s name they started asking her questions about whether she was related to the famous little Mary Phagan who had been murdered long ago by Leo Frank on Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday, April 26, 1913.
Mary Phagan Kean would learn a startling secret when people started asking her questions about her curious name, so she asked her family if she was somehow connected to the Mary Phagan who was murdered so long ago in the National Pencil Factory. When her family revealed the truth about her blood relation, Mary Phagan Kean immediately became insatiably interested in learning about the investigation, and its aftermath.
Instantly becoming a life long student of the case at age 13, Mary Phagan-Kean has devoted every free moment of her entire life studying volumes of research and documents, reading every surviving document surrounding the torture, rape and strangulation of her great grand aunt, 13 year old Mary Phagan (1899 to 1913) and the biography of Leo Max Frank (1884 to 1915).
B’nai B’rith
Leo Frank was the President of the 500 member Atlanta Chapter of B’nai B’rith beginning in 1912, and re-elected again in 1913, until his term expired in 1914. As a result of his conviction, the case turned into a national scandal and eventually evolved into a sensational cause celebre. For the Jewish Community it would become the critical mass of “anti-Semitism” catalyzing the formation of two American groups: the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith born in October, 1913, or ADL (www.ADL.org) for short, and spark the revival of the defunct nativist and floundering ethnic nationalist Ku Klux Klan (KKK) on November 24, 1915.
The KKK considers themselves as the “immune system of the United States of America”, providing an immunal response to what they perceived as an infection of the United States of America, as a host-body, by a Collective Jewish virus/parasite. The ADL considers itself a civil rights group defending Jews and Israel against Anti-Semitism (Anti-Jewish Racism).
Misrepresentations
Jewish Scholars overwhelmingly wrote the lion share of all the written “victim-centric” books, articles, web sites, scripts, video, media, songs, broadway plays and texts about the subject of Leo Frank and Mary Phagan, and almost unanimously allege the investigation, trial, and conviction where part of a widespread Antisemitic Gentile Sponsored Conspiracy, a text book case of Anti-Semitism; the railroading, and framing of an innocent Jewish Man because of anti-Jewish racism, prejudice and religious hatred. Leo Frank partisan books often leave out volumes of the relevant facts, evidence and testimony concerning the Leo Frank case, dishonestly spinning the facts convenient to creating doubt about Leo Franks guilty verdict.
If you have any doubts about Leo Frank’s guilt study the brief of evidence and SIFT IT!
1982 and 1983: The Alonzo Mann Media Hoax
In 1982, Alonzo Mann, a lonely, broke and senile octogenarian, who also happened to be the former office boy of Leo Frank for three weeks in April, 1913, came forward at the behest of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, with a fantastic story about what he saw on April 26, 1913 at noon.
1982 was about 69 years after the murder of Mary Phagan, and the trial of Leo M. Frank for her murder. Alonzo “Lonnie” Mann went public with a story claiming he had withheld information from the Leo M. Frank legal defense team, police, Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey, the Judge Leonard Strickland Roan, the Jury of 12 White men, Appeals Courts, Slaton’s Commutation hearing and seven decades of people.
Alonzo Mann said that, he went back to the National Pencil Company Factory after he left it April 26, 1913, and saw the Negro Janitor Jim Conley, carrying the body of Mary Phagan on his shoulder, and Jim Conley reached out his hand for Alonzo Mann and said to the young boy, “if you tell anyone , I will kill you”. Alonzo Mann, claimed he ran home and told his parents and they told him not to tell anyone.
In the 1980’s, Alonzo Mann’s statement made no sense and came off as a desperate web of lies according to many person who heard his newfangled claims.
First, why would White parents in a White racial separatist Georgia of 1913, tell their White son not to tell the police on a “murdering”, and guilty black janitor Jim Conley, with the result being an “innocent” clean cut White boss, Leo Frank, who gave their son a highly prized job, going to gallows? Instead of a guilty Negro?
Second, why would White parents allow their son to report to work on Monday Morning, April 28, 1913, right after their son was threatened with death on Saturday April 26, 1913? Alonzo Mann Reported for work Monday morning, April 28, 1913 when all the forensic revelations were made at the National Pencil Company.
Third, if Alonzo Mann admitted in 1982 he lied under oath at the Leo Frank trial in 1913 (about leaving at 11:30 AM), what’s not to say he wasn’t lying again in 1982 / 1983, when he said he came back at noon. 70 years after the trial, he was asked why he came back, and he said it was about a bet he made with Schiff, but everyone knows Schiff was not meant to come to work that day.
The ADL tried to use the Alonzo Mann Affair to get a posthumous pardon at first in 1983, but it failed. Three long years of political machinations, back room wheeling and dealing continued until a second attempt was made.
1986: Second Attempt Successful
In 1986, pressure from the powerful Jewish community, Jewish groups and ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith), resulted in the highly political March 11, 1986 posthumous pardon of Leo Frank (without exoneration).
There was only one problem with the highly political pardon, Alonzo Mann had died in March of 1985 and no one could question him. The politically corrupt board forgave Leo Frank with a pardon, but kept Leo Frank’s GUILT intact and thus did not disturb the verdict of the Jury.
On March 11, 1986, a pardon without exoneration of guilt was issued by the board:
Without attempting to address the question of guilt or innocence, and in recognition of the State’s failure to protect the person of Leo M. Frank and thereby preserve his opportunity for continued legal appeal of his conviction, and in recognition of the State’s failure to bring his killers to justice, and as an effort to heal old wounds, the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, in compliance with its Constitutional and statutory authority, hereby grants to Leo M. Frank a Pardon.
A most grotesque symbol of political power just unraveled.
Even with the posthumous pardon, it was specified the guilt of Leo M. Frank remains permanently intact, because his official conviction was not changed, disturbed or tampered with from 1913 to 1986. As of March 11, 1986, Leo M. Frank remains guilty in the eyes of Black Letter and Settled Law forever more, though he was forgiven of his crime by the board, he was not forgiven by the public that detests pedophile-rapists and child murderers.
A number of fictionalized media dramatizations and treatments have been made about the trial in the form of plays, musicals, miniseries, docudramas, video blogs, songs, and Broadway plays conducted across the international theater landscape, all created by Jews making a mockery of the life of a little Christian girl Mary Phagan who is used as nothing more than a plot device to launch Leo Frank’s persecution hoax at the hands of evil Gentiles.
Attempts for more than 100 years are continuing to launched to idealize and rehabilitate the image of Leo Frank as an innocent and stoic Jewish victim of “Antisemitism”.
The transfiguration attempts to transform Leo Frank from a perverted pedophile rapist and strangler into a holy Jewish religious martyr of collective Gentile prejudice.
The blood libel against the Leo Frank prosecution team, European-Americans and people who think Leo Frank is guilty, continues to this day by the Jewish community, though sometimes it is couched. The Leo Frank Case is a Jewish-Gentile conflict that has been smoldering for 100 years.
Three Leo M. Frank Murder Confessions From the 1913 Brief of Evidence
1. To Jim Conley, Saturday, April 26, 1913, Circa Noon to 1:00 PM (See Jim Conley affidavits and trial testimony in the brief of evidence (1913) and Georgia supreme court case file about Leo Frank (1913, 1914).
2. To Lucille Selig Frank, Saturday Late Evening, April 26, 1913, 10:30 PM (See State’s Exhibit J, Brief of Evidence, 1913)
3. To The Public, Monday, August 18, 1913, after 2:00 PM and before 6:30 PM (Leo Frank four hour unsworn trial statement, August 18, Brief of Evidence, 1913)
The Fourth Leo Frank Confession Published in the Atlanta Constitution
4. Leo Frank confirmed his August 18, 1913, murder trial confession in the March 9, 1914, issue of the Atlanta Constitution.
The Jewish community won’t dare to ever mention the “unconscious” bathroom murder trial confession that Leo Frank made on the witness stand when he was giving his four hour unsworn statement at the trial on Monday afternoon, August 18, 1913, between 2:00pm and 6:00pm. Thoughtful and analytical interpretations of the statement Leo Frank made to counter Monteen Stover’s testimony is always left out of most Leo Frank partisan and revisionist books, even though it proves Leo Frank’s guilt indisputably when juxtaposed with State’s Exhibit B and Jim Conley saying he found Mary Phagan dead in the metalroom bathroom (State’s Exhibit A) at the behest of Leo Frank (Leo Frank’s trial statement, Monteen Stover’s trial testimony, State’s Exhibit B, Jim Conley’s trial testimony and affidavits, brief of evidence, 1913).
Leo Frank is the only person in early 20th century US history to make what amounted to a murder confession at his own trial, leaving most people gobsmacked by it.
See the final closing arguments of Hugh M. Dorsey, Frank Arthur Hooper and Tom Watson’s later interpretations of the Leo Frank murder confession (Watson Magazine, September, 1915).
Also see State’s Exhibit A, B, J, Monteen Stover’s Testimony, Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott’s Testimony and the Statement given by Leo Frank to the Jury countering the testimony of Monteen Stover – with an “unconscious” bathroom visit to the metal room between 12:05 and 12:10PM on April 26, 1913. Study the Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913 and the Leo M. Frank Georgia Supreme Court Case File.
The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913 – The first neutral book written on the subject in 1913. Very interesting read available on: www.Archive.org.
1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (Available here on www.Archive.org). Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events surrounding the trial of Leo Frank and considered the most balanced, fair and accurate work on the Leo Frank case. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is well worth reading and it is a refreshing change from the endless number of Leo Frank partisan media, articles and books turning the Leo Frank case into a mellow dramatic, Jewish, neurotic, race obsessed and hollyweird tabloid controversy. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is required reading.
2. American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson (Available here on www.Archive.org) Tends to be biased or lean in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team, this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some important things said at the trial and the details of some of the evidence when it republishes parts of the official trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh Manson Dorsey. What this book possesses is something that no other book does, it has the abridged closing arguments of State’s prosecution team members Hugh M. Dorsey and Frank Arthur Hooper, be sure to read their interpretation of the Gobsmacking, August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession when Leo Frank to counter Monteen Stover’s testimony, says that he might have had the safe door open or “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the metal room. Be sure to familiarize yourself with Monteen Stover’s testimony and the official 1913 Brief of Evidence. For the best interpretation of the mind boggling Leo Frank murder confession, one better than both Hugh Dorsey and Frank Arthur Hooper, then definitely read the Anti-Semite Tom Watson’s five works on the Leo Frank trial in his Watson’s Magazine issues: Jan, March, August, September and October of 1915. Putting aside Watson’s vile Anti-Semitism, his works on the Leo Frank case are delicious, full of wit, sarcasm, energy and venom (Required Reading).
For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the official 1913 murder trial brief of evidence (available on archive.org) and you can see what was left out in American State Trials Volume X 1918.
3. Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank (Available here on Archive.org.). Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this books.
This is an excellent book and required reading to see how Hugh Dorsey in sales vernacular ‘closed’ a Jury of 12 men and Judge Roan. Make sure you read the section on the Leo Frank murder confession in this book and compare it to the one in American State Trials Volume X 1918, see the differences in the final closing arguments.
4. Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of Evidence. Extremely rare, only 1 copy exists, and it is at the Georgia State Archive. This document is available now on www.Archive.org.
5.,6.,7., The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta Journal, The Atlanta Georgian (Hearst’s Tabloid Yellow Journalism), April 28th to August 27th 1913.
8. Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper 1914, 1915, 1916, and 1917 and Watson’s Magazine 1915: Watson’s Magazine, January 1915, Watson’s Magazine, March 1915; Watson’s Magazine, August 1915, Watson’s Magazine, September 1915, and Watson’s Magazine, October of 1915. (Available here on www.Archive.org). Tom Watson’s best work on the Leo M. Frank case was published in September 1915. Watson’s five works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with superb reasoning.
These five works are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Tom Watson’s magazine publications surged from 30,000 to 100,000 copies, when it was announced he would be writing on the Leo Frank case. These magazines are extremely rare and very difficult to find. However they have been scanned and are available on www.Archive.org.
8.1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org
8.2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org
8.3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org
8.4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org
8.5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: www.Archive.org
See: Jeffersonian Newspapers 1914, 1915, 1916, and 1917
Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper
9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson
Online Leo M. Frank Portal
10. The Leo M. Frank Research Library and Archive: http://www.LeoFrank.Org

Fair Usage Law

April 17, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Christian, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Multicultural News  Comments Closed

Alien Nation by Peter Brimelow

http://www.archive.org/details/Alien_Nation

Alien Nation
By Peter Brimelow

E pluribus unum no more? Like most other recent immigrants, former Englishman Brimelow thinks U.S. immigration policy badly needs reforming. Immigration is too high to begin with, he says, but also too many unskilled workers are coming, legally as well as illegally, as are too many persons whose ethnicities differ from the U.S. norm of predominantly European extractions. Brimelow maintains that besides the ill effects present immigration has on law enforcement, social service provision, public health, and the environment, it is undermining the sense of the U.S. as a nation. But we’ve always been “a nation of immigrants,” you say? Brimelow documents that that is true only in that the American people, like the people of every other nation we know of, came from somewhere else. Moreover, throughout American history, immigration has occurred, not continuously, but in several waves that have alternated with long periods of assimilation– this is the pattern that built the nation and that the immigration tsunami touched off by the 1965 Immigration Act and complicated by the political resistance to assimilation known as multiculturalism has broken. The U.S. badly needs to drastically reduce immigration now, absorb the last 30 years’ worth of new Americans, and rethink its immigration policies, Brimelow concludes, or it may dissolve into a bunch of smaller countries, in some of which democracy as we enjoy it will not survive. Writing in the magnetically readable, “sledgehammer” (his term) style of his principal employer, Forbes, Brimelow is sure to fuel the debates on U.S. immigration policy in the months ahead.

“One of the most widely discussed books of the year.”
-Jerry Adler, Newsweek

“An indispensable book…. Either side may profitably imbibe this bottled brio. Makes a powerful-indeed,, nearly overwhelming-case against the status quo.”
– Jack Miles, Los Angeles Times, in Atlantic Monthly

“Raw meat that will offend politically correct members of the cultural elite. It may also strike a responsive chord with a great many ordinary Americans.”
-Stephan Thernstrom, Washington Post

“A brilliant book.”
– Edwin A. Roberts, Tampa Tribune

“I have also been an ‘open immigration’ advocate… [but] Alien Nation has persuaded me … to call for an immediate suspension of all immigration.”
-William B. Allen., former chairman. Commission on Civil Rights, in Detroit News and Free Press

“A book not to be missed…. Every American citizen owes a debt of gratitude to Peter Brimelow.”
-William A. Rusher, Washington Times

“Important…. Many of the facts given in this book will be surprising even to well-informed readers.”
-Nathan Glazer Harvard University

“Deserves praise for going to the heart of the immigration issue.”
-Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History and The Last Man

“His fear is justified. We will bury him.”
-Lawrence Chua, Village Voice

Peter Brimelow is a senior editor at Forbes and National Review magazines in New York. He is the author of The Patriot Game: Canada and the Canadian Question Revisited.

http://www.archive.org/details/Alien_Nation

Fair Usage Law

February 18, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

9-11-2011 Anti-Semitism and the NYC Tragedy 9-11-2001

THE 9/11/01 ATTACK ON THE USA

A Position Paper and Commentary

By Harrell Rhome

[Written 9/13/01]

DEDICATION AND THESIS STATEMENT

We offer this article with prayer and concern for the innocent victims of oppression, especially those who had no part in the plans and aims of their leaders. May God bless the victims of all atrocities — from Ruby Ridge and Chechnya and Mt. Carmel; all the way to Occupied Palestine (and now, Iraq – and possibly Iran), and sadly but predictably to New York and Washington. These victims may now rest in peace. We, however, shall have no peace until significant changes occur in the hearts and minds of Americans and their government, and when justice and fair play become components in our presently misguided and dangerous foreign policies.

Change is inexorable and inevitable. Yesterday and today do not necessarily predict tomorrow. The status quo is never static; it only seems so. “Throughout all aspects of human history, great pivotal events have caught most people unaware. We all tend to become seduced and hypnotized by the status quo. We inherently extrapolate the present into the future, relying on linear assumptions in a non-linear world. Because something looks stable today, we usually tend to naturally assume that it will remain the same tomorrow.” [Adam Hamilton, Gold Eagle Digest]

DESTRUCTION OF THE “TEMPLES,” EXPLORING SYMBOLISM, REALITY, AND LINEAR ASSUMPTIONS.

Rome, The Eternal World City, c. 475 A.D. Flavius Marcus Silva and wife, Drucilla were rudely awakened by their servants. It seems that a barbarian army has, once again, made its way to Rome, but this time, it was more serious. Over the years, the fierce Goths and Teutons had used horror and terror against the cultured, civilized, urbane Romans. While they had not (yet) succeeded, they had indeed progressed, though most Romans, absorbed by their grandeur and arrogance, really seemed not to notice, though their slaves had outnumbered them for years, and periodically revolted. The Romans could not understand this. After all, they had given the slaves so much. But while the barbarians had made their way inside, there was little resistance. The Circus Maximus was open early that morning for the gory games (professional sports and “reality” TV), and many were already making their way there after beginning the wine-bibbing early, to be followed by several orgy parties. There was always a party in Rome, and to amuse the blase’ Romans, over a dozen gladiators and lions had just arrived from Africa. Drucilla looked out the window, and was horrified to see smoke from some of the great palaces and temples on the surrounding seven hills. Great billows of smoke poured forth, and black and red-bearded barbarians were looting and raping women in the streets. “Where are our Legions (military),” shouted Flavius? “They are the greatest in the world; they will save us. Where are the priests and the Pontifex Maximus? They should defend the temples of our Gods. Where are our Tribunes (cops and lawyers)? If they cannot do it, then call out the Praetorian Guard (FBI, special forces, etc.). But where are they? And where is the Emperor (currently with the Praetorian guard, hiding at a base in a swamp)? He will surely come out and reassure us?”

To make a very long story short, before they knew what had happened, the old world had changed and a new one had arisen while Flavius and Drucilla continued their linear assumptions about the future, that all would go on as before. They did not prepare for the inexorable historical processes of quantum-change. Nothing but God lasts forever, and the law of give and take manifested itself in the end of an “eternal empire”. Moreover, Rome reaped what had been planted. How many lives, nations and cultures were violently overrun by the Romans? How many rival “temples” had they burned and looted? Did the old Romans ever think of how they really were, and how they really were seen by the ones they dominated and enslaved? Are we modern-day Romans any more aware? That Rome was collapsing was either unknown or ignored by most Romans, who blithely pursued their bored, gluttonous lives. A few were awake, and even a few prescient ones saw it coming, but no one listened. Other than military force (Pentagon Temple) and money (Wall Street and WTC Temples), they seemed to have no other response. How tragic! The fallacy of linear assumptions brings down entire cultures and societies.

New York, financial and multicultural Capital of the World, September 11, 2001. I was working to complete an essay about Osama bin Laden “coincidentally” at the time that the twin World Trade Center Towers, hallmark of American mercantilism in the heart of the Wall Street trade and money district, were brought down (allegedly) by a pair of planes. A short time later, the symbol of America’s highly vaunted military might, the Pentagon (or “Pentacle” building), was also struck a severe blow. Great “temples” were destroyed. While certainly an evil act, the planning and the (albeit perverted) brilliance are undeniable as is the equally unparalleled use of symbols as well as force to make the point, beginning with “911″. The deadly “missiles” themselves were symbolic: from “United” and two from “American”. We could hardly miss the point. Tens of thousands have died and thousands of others have been maimed, but these scenes are not unfamiliar to most, and we have become a “culture” numb to violence and destruction. Many movies have portrayed countless disaster scenes (some very similar; remember the aliens hitting on July 4?) in special effects, and if you don’t like the pretend violence, you could see the real thing in the repeated senseless bombing of the Iraqi people and the air war of terrorism against the people of Serbia. Both war crimes were perpetrated on minor powers with no way to strike back. Both Sadaam and Milosevic were styled as “Hitlers”, but we knew that neither could inflict real harm in response to our selfish and immoral acts of ultra-violence. We all watched the Gulf War and air war against the Serbs with the bored, arrogant air of detachment so characteristic of many Americans. “Ho hum, that’s enough of that, let’s watch a cable movie. I’m bored with all that foreign stuff. Bomb the s___ out of them, who cares? It’s just a bunch of towel-heads!”

The status quo is ended. Why? How?. As happens to those who inflict pain, terror and horror on others, the dark angel of death has decided to pay us a “courtesy call” (it could have been worse, you know?). And the “war” didn’t just suddenly start on 9/11. It has been going on for years while we continued our unvarying and completely uncritical support of Israel (Occupied Palestine), therefore being a direct and knowing accomplice to the war crimes of that malevolent ministate. The attacks have gotten progressively more serious (and effective), but like a giant being attacked by fleas, it barely caused us to miss a single lock-step in our support of the world Zionist land and power-grabbers. While I’ve always thought it trite and banal, the ever-popular expression, “what goes around comes around” now takes on a deeper and bizarre new meaning. Furthermore, while I am sure that most Americans will be enraged and out for vengeance and blood, I am also certain that, as usual, they will largely misperceive their targets. Most will only hate Islamic people even more, further alienating us from most of the rest of the world (who support a free Palestine), and in return, their already fiery hate for us will grow to a white-hot fury. Americans desire vengeance in spite of any religious lip service paid to Christianity or any other religion, and this will surely be only more intense in the weeks to follow. Narrow, linear thinking is truly tragic.

THE OFFICIAL RESPONSE, OR, “OI VEY, BUBBALEH, WHO COULD KNOW?”

The U.S. intelligence budget (for all agencies) is immense, and much larger than what is reported. For years, we have had a “black budget”, supposedly overseen by Congress, but with such as Rep. Gary (“I shave my body”) Condit on that committee, who can say? Not only that, factor in the other NATO nations and the amount each of them spends on intelligence, and the figure must run close to a trillion or more! And nobody knew?! Give, me a break! Even the dumbed-down and apathetic “average American” can (probably) put two and two together here and see that the result can’t be explained merely in terms of ignorance (“we didn’t know”). IF this were true, then we should impeach (indict?) each member of the congressional intel committees AND go after the bureaucrats in charge of these agencies. Their incredible incompetence has taken the lives of thousands. Or is it incompetence? How can it be that out of all the highly-vaunted intel apparatus of the mighty West did not know about this? Can Osama bin Laden and company be that good? The are two possible scenarios, so let’s look closely at both.

Scenario A: They really did not know.

In spite of what is said above, it is within the realm of possibility. For one thing, excluding double agents and “moles”, there are only a few Americans and Europeans who can speak and read Arabic at all, much less have the fluency necessary to work undercover or pose as an Islamic person. Therefore, one of the basic tools of spy craft is not available. “Hu-mint” (human intelligence assets) are almost completely lacking. On the other side of this is the “enemy”, a loose (but sometimes very tight) coalition of international terrorists reaching from Northern Ireland to Indonesia to Columbia and into the United States with its notoriously porous borders. The language problem is not nearly as great, especially in a city like New York with people speaking a myriad of accented versions of English. The simple fact is this: “they” can quite easily infiltrate here while “we” can do little than look on from afar or depend on an unreliable network of informers, double agents and moles who use such a network as a vehicle for an essential and on-going program of planted dis-information. While we have the upper hand in high-tech stuff like satellite viewing, on the ground our agents don’t stand a chance. Why not, you may say, recruit Arab-Americans and other friendly Arabs to do this for us? No doubt, we have/are doing that, but this too has its limitations. For one thing, any traitor to his roots and religion would know that not only he will face a horrible death, but the betrayed ones will probably take out his entire family as well! So anyone doing this would not only have to be suicidal, but be totally uncaring about his family and friends. On top of all this, add in the fact that, much more often than not, the U.S. betrays its allies and friends. Based on our past performances, western governments and intel bureaus are not to be trusted. Hence, it is possible that they either did not know. Or, if they did get some hints, they (as often is the case) misinterpreted the data. Moreover, add in the arrogance and egotism of many “spy-guys”, and you can see how this could happen. Or not! Hence….

Scenario B: They knew and let it happen.

Osama bin Laden has always given some kind of warning of his attacks as was discovered after the near-sinking of the USS Cole. These warnings are probably part of an early activation system of his network and to alert like-minded groups and individuals to be ready, and to stay out of the way. Did highly secretive NSA and the (lesser known and even more secretive) National Reconnaissance Agency not have at least some warning? Under this scenario, and given that previous warnings were received, there must have been something. Of course, as they say, “hindsight is always 20-20 vision”, so it may be that they did, indeed, pick up a hint or two, but did not know what to do with it as such “warnings” are quite vague and cryptic. Some say this happened in the OKC bombing: that McVeigh was either a government agent or (more likely) that he did do (at least some of) the bombing, and the FBI was monitoring the matter, which got out of hand. This is how DEA, BATF and FBI (and all sorts of Fed) “stings” work. They “string you along”; they do not bust you on the first or the second or even third or fourth drug buys (or arms or whatever), but only when they have built a solid, airtight case, and (the main reason) until the target has revealed all the contacts and other information that he or she can. If this was the OKC scenario, one can see how foreknowledge of this behavior could be used against the Feds. In other words, while they are waiting for you to reveal just one more big contact or bring in a big delivery of whatever, you go ahead and pull something off on another front, or launch your operation when they do not expect it. These are not secrets. Read books and other accounts of cases, and this method is easily found.

But this begs the question of just exactly why “they” would do this. The old question of Cui bono? (to whose benefit?) seems an apt legal investigative principle to apply. Israel and its pro-Zionist “amen corner” in the U.S. will certainly benefit. After all, we now know how the Israelis feel after a disco or whatever is blown up. So we will sympathize, then, even more with their cause, which, in reality, is at the heart of this whole problem. But watch and see. This will surely (at least to a large degree anyway) have this result. A further benefit will occur for our One-World Planners. They have already succeeded in militarizing both the tactics and the minds and attitudes of our police forces at almost all levels. We saw this before the Oklahoma City bombing, but it took another quantum leap after that. Now, anytime a citizen is stopped you are seen as a “security risk”. And quite frankly, if you’re black or from the Middle East or Mexico — or maybe if you are a vocal patriot-nationalist – you are even more suspect, and could fall victim (as have a growing number) to “friendly fire”. The “Drug Wars” have certainly contributed to this as well, but we’ll look at that in later essay. So then, such a catastrophic event as Oklahoma City and now New York and Washington, will no doubt have many calling for more police and more military spending. And there is a third result that benefits those who are carrying out a fantastically successful gradual revolution to discredit our early founders and eventually displace and replace our constitution. Sadly, most of it has already eroded away, but the principles still stand. At least, until they are replaced in the interests of “national security” and the “safety of our citizens”. Hence, dissidents, those who speak out against such things will be subject to no First Amendment protections because there won’t be a First Amendment or a Fifth or any other. They might still be on paper, but “expediency” will have overridden them completely. If you don’t know of whom I speak, dear readers, please realize that it is, yes, those of us who speak out publicly. But that’s just the ones in the first wave of repression. The second part will be directed at those who read and circulate and speak out in your own communities. Can’t happen here? That’s what they said on Wall Street and at the Pentagon on 9/11 day!

ADDENDUM: “THE FLORIDA CONNECTION” ?

Revisionist Attorney and “Eagle” reader Anita E. Belle submits this interesting speculation as to impending World Court cases against the U.S. and C.I.A. for Genocide, and we already know that Ariel Sharon (“Butcher of Beirut”) has a case pending as well. Belle lists a number of other such potentially embarrassing and far-reaching legal actions which will be circumvented by the 9/11 events. In addition, she itemizes several case connections with Florida.

[Fax from Atty. Anita E. Belle, 12 September 2001.] “Coincidence? Hijacking suspects are located in Florida, the state in which the president’s brother is governor, the state in which the C.I.A. [drug trafficking] cases are consolidated, the state whose contested votes placed George W. Bush in the presidency, and the state in which George W. Bush was visiting when the “terrorist?” attack took place.”[1] As of 12 September, we know Florida was also the site a flight training school used by some of the terrorists. (Send an SASE for full press release.)

But, back to our speculation: did “they” know? Well, if they didn’t really know anything at all, and if this is reflective of our intel assets, we are really in “it” up to our necks!

WHERE WERE OUR “FEARLESS LEADERS”?

This seems an appropriate point to reflect on what they did do. Bush II disappeared, touching ground in the Louisiana swamps long enough to record a short video address. This wasn’t a bad idea, though coming direct from Air Force One or some other “power center” would have seemed more appropriate. But when they began to run the tape, it took at least three attempts to get the video feed right! So we see Bush Baby start to say something, but we are left (at least three times) with a squiggly, distorted image that, if you thought enough about it, was thoroughly frightening! Then, no one else comes out of hiding to speak. I thought Rumsfeld was dead in the Pentagon until they finally trotted him out – to say practically nothing! Where is brave and stalwart Gen. Colin Powell, “hero of the Gulf (Bush Oil) War? Wouldn’t that have comforted and reassured some? Where was the head of the CIA to assure us they would track down the perpetrators and that, even now, they were hot on the trail? But we saw none of them, except for, finally, a brief clip of Ashcroft. Instead, we see James Baker, Lawrence Eagleburger, Warren Christopher and other assorted voices from the past. Since, our “leaders” are still assuming that they can proceed as they have before, a deadly linear assumption! As readers know, I detested and abhorred the Clinton regime, but one thing I do believe is that, despite “zipper problems”, he would have gotten on the air and addressed the American people. There, readers, I finally said it – something good about Bill Clinton!

THE REASONS FOR THE ATTACK: UNCRITICAL, BLIND AND STUBBORN SUPPORT OF ISRAEL (Occupied Palestine) IS THE SEEDBED OF PRESENT TROUBLES.

What is behind all of this? The United States of America is largely under the control of a pro-Zionist cabal, which some call a “Z.O.G.”, i.e., Zionist Occupation Government. When we look at our blind and stubbornly unyielding support of the Israeli ministate (Occupied Palestine) and its particularly heinous versions of state terrorism toward the Palestinians, is it any surprise that we are blamed as well? Is it any surprise that America, who are the enablers of Israel, are hated as well? The Israelis practice assassination, return deadly machine gun fire in the face of rocks and sticks, kill and burn old people and children in their homes, creating the same climate of fear and terror that we now know here at home after 9/11. Without our aiding and abetting policies and money, the Israeli pirate ministate would never be able to continue to practice this political terrorism in the face of world opposition. If it were not for the U.S., Israel would be forced to make a reasonable peace. If it were not for the U.S., many nations of the world would long ago have boycotted and embargoed the ministate if it had maintained the same arrogant inflexible stance. Sadly, then, it is little wonder that we are hated by many. Add to this our incredible public ignorance and apathy and arrogance, and we have a situation which was/is exploited to the fullest by this cabal of conspirators. And this is not all. For one reason or another (we shall speculate later), we also trained, equipped and financed this “terror network” ourselves a generation ago in Afghanistan. So we not only reap the wind from our misbegotten and ill-conceived foreign polices, we also reap the whirlwind that has arisen from seeds we ourselves planted years ago in Afghanistan.

What is happening? Why have these terrors come to our homeland? Who is responsible? What can we do? Look in the mirror! It’s us! It is we who have allowed a religio-political cult (Zionism) to gain control of our government. This is a One-World-Government cult that ruthlessly and relentlessly stifles or destroys almost every strong voice opposing them. The Zionist Cabal and its sympathizers own and/or control almost all media, the only real exception being the Internet, and that too may not be far off. Without going into a great amount of detail and background material, it is clear that this/ cabal is deeply entrenched not only in politics, but also controls the money as well. The 9/11 Strike can be seen as a two-pronged direct attack against Wall Street “capitalism” and all it symbolizes and at our “imperial legions” whose might makes the whole thing possible. With all of this in perspective, it is not so hard to see why a large portion of the world’s citizens celebrated 9/11 Day in the streets. While I can never defend such hideous ultra-violence, neither can I defend, support and ignore the hurt, pain, misery and death “our” government has perpetrated during and since World War II!

IN THIS “WAR”, CAN WE DEFEAT THE ENEMY? Defeat The enemy? We can barely find him or precisely identify him. Some of the myriad of talking heads (a.k.a. “counter-terrorism experts”) even said such stupid things as, “we must have more human intelligence (“Hu-mint”)” and “we must put more resources into infiltrating their cells.” Anyone who follows any of this closely sees that we not only have a mere handful of agents who can function in Arabic (or Farsi or Urdu), and none of them are candidates to infiltrate, being mostly scholarly types. Terrorist assets are profiled as young, from poorer families, faced with unemployment and little money, dedicated to Islam, and always referred after screening through an at-first informal network, progressively getting deeper scrutiny before acceptance. Even if ethnically one of their own, the would-be suicide warrior would have to face this same scrutiny. So this is virtually impossible, then, right? Well, yes, but…. We might pull off a successful infiltration if our agent is as at least as dedicated as those he would infiltrate, and more importantly, if our agent were willing to offer his life for the U.S., NATO, the Bush Oil Boys, K-Mart, Wal-Mart, the Federal Reserve, and the “American Way of Life”. And he would have to be dedicated to and revere his leader as do the ones he would infiltrate. He can have the beady-eyed visage of Bush II in his mind as his risks his life, facing torture and mutilation before death if caught. Hurry now, volunteers. They’re just waiting for one like you down at Langley.

And, yes, readers, Osama bin Laden DID warn us – over four years ago, directly and honestly in 1998 to ABC reporter John Miller. In it, he refers to the earlier bomb attempt at the World Trade Center. Please listen very closely.

“So we tell the Americans as people, and we tell the mothers of soldiers and American mothers in general that if they value their lives and the lives of their children, to find a nationalist government that will look after their interests and not the interests of the Jews. The continuation of tyranny will bring the fight to America as Ramzi Yousef and others did. This is my message to the American people: to look for a serious government that looks out for their interests and does not attack others, their lands, or their honor.

And my word to American journalists is not to ask why, but ask what their government has done that forced us to defend ourselves.

It is our duty to lead people to the light.”

[Thanks to revisionist researcher, writer, and “Eagle” reader Mark Farrell for sending this information via e-mail.]

Wake up ! How many more must die before the policies of a power-mad elite of old men and women who, as “illumined ones” (Illuminati), those “brighter” and more “enlightened” than the rest of us, those who never die for their beliefs, those who profit from all wars, are recognized and exposed to the “average” person? Listen, my readers, listen well – this is exactly what “they” fear the most – that the “people” catch on to their scams and rackets. And that is why publications like this one are disrespected and downgraded by “their” media and academia.

Wake up ! You’ve been asleep, oh, much too long, and it’s almost too late! Don’t send your children to die in a war for racketeers. Don’t place yourself and everyone else in danger of bombs and death to defend the pseudo-rights of what is essentially a cabalistic coven of land-grabbing Turko-Khazar Bolshevist thugs in a land (Palestine) that was never theirs! Let them face their own problems as do real nation-states.

Wake up ! How many “9/11 calls” do you need ?

ADOPT A FAIR AND JUST FOREIGN POLICY

Should we surrender to these forces and change our entire foreign policy out of fear and cowardice? No, I could never do that. Capitulation solely from fear can only engender more attacks, so any crucial policy changes must be carefully thought out and implemented. Just announcing a gradual end to aid to Israel would force the coven of thugs into negotiating in the give and take among real nations. In return for a gradual phase-out, they should officially give up any claims based on their sham-claim to be a “favored folk”. With new policies in place, the USA would not so much withdraw from the middle east, but for the first time, we would perhaps be able (along with Europe) to be an “honest broker” of peace and justice and freedom for all. Not only this, our entire aggressive arrogant assuming asinine policy-making system must be thoroughly rebuilt in order to take our rightful place among nations. A “superpower” is just another word for a big, stupid bully. This is what we have become – Americans must demand a “new age”, a “new reformation”, a devolution back 1776 (this ended in 1865) — all these things and more, but surely we can all agree that there certainly must be some very radical changes implemented. Make no “bones” about it; it will be a hard road, but it leads to honesty and truth, so how hard, really, can it be? And, no, hear me very clearly — this should not be done out of fear, but out of a sense of fairness and honesty that is supposed to characterize our once great nation and its policies. When they are subverted by cliques and conspiracies (special interest groups and PACs), there is no justice. To conclude then, as the Left so likes to say, “without justice there is no peace”.

“As night does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness” Justice William O. Douglas

911 Is Still A Cry For Help

By Judy Andreas

8-20-11

As 9/11 comes barreling back into view, my mind is flooded with the questions that still remain. We sat in the Conference Room, our eyes riveted to the TV monitor. Some of my colleagues were sniffling, others were crying softly. Occasionally an angry statement could be heard. Over and over again we watched the World Trade Center footage. Over and over again, the newscasters cemented their version of reality into our stunned psyches. It was September 11, 2001, the day the music died. Something was terribly wrong. It was more than the film that unfolded in front of my eyes. It was more than the words of the newscasters talking about the fact that we were under siege. It was more than the threat of never ending terrorism. The television screamed the official story, yet the voices in my head muted the words. Something was terribly wrong. My feeling of disbelief was palpable. Sitting in that room of mourners on that sorrowful day, I was having a solitary experience. Questions begged for answers. How could our sophisticated system have gone awry? How could everything that had previously worked flawlessly, suddenly simultaneously failed? How could a small group of Arabs with boxcutters have thrown the whole nation into a tailspin? Most of the people, if not all of the people, in the Conference Room had never heard of Payne Stewart. They did not know the story of the golfer whose private Learjet had lost contact with the air traffic controllers. They did not know that when the golfer’s jet failed to respond to air traffic controller communications, F-16 interceptors were quickly dispatched. According to an Air Force timeline, a series of military planes provided an emergency escort to Payne’s stricken Learjet starting about 20 minutes after contact with his plane was lost. Later I learned that the Miami Herald talked to air traffic controllers who said they could not understand why there was no reaction to what was happening in the skies the morning of September 11, 2001. Why was there no reaction from the Federal Aviation Administration and the military? “That’s a question that more and more people are going to ask,” one controller in Miami told the Herald. Are more and more people asking that question? Are more and more people asking any questions? “They attacked us because they hate our freedom.” The President’s eyes darted back and forth as he mouthed the words. It could have been a laughable comment. It was certainly a ludicrous comment. It could have been funny if I hadn’t seen people jumping hundreds of feet to their death. It could have been funny if thousands of people hadn’t lost their lives on that infamous day. I wanted to ask him why they didn’t fly planes into Amsterdam, after all, they have more freedom than we do. I wanted to ask him why they didn’t cripple a nuclear reactor. I wanted to ask him why he was lying to us. Each day as the story unfolded, another alternative website pointed to another anomaly in the official story. Had a plane really hit the Pentagon? The size of the hole in its supposed wake left room for doubt. Was it physically possible for the Towers to collapse as stated, or was it controlled demolition? Were there explosives in the World Trade Center? Could burning jet fuel initiate structural damage within the towers? Why was Building 7 pulled? Could a cell phone call be made on a plane? Why was the Mayor of San Francisco, Willie Brown, told not to fly on that date? Why was the rubble from the buildings hauled off without a proper investigation? Wonderful books kept flying off the shelves of the alternative press. And yet, the mainstream media stuck with the official story. It could have been the Kennedy Assasination(s). It could have been TWA Flight 800. It could have been Oklahoma City or Waco. I had visited this place before. It was difficult to breathe with the stench of deception in the air. Although movies have always been a passion of mine, I have tried to be discerning about time spent in the cinema. And yet, as the days grew into months, I was trapped in the theater of the absurd mainstream media, forced to watch a poorly crafted film about the events on September 11. Such props as Mohammed Atta’s passport placed pristinely on the set cried out for a director’s intervention. Who put the Korans in the vehicle near the scene of the crime? How did we immediately know it was Osama bin Laden who had designed the events of September 11, 2001? How did we immediately know the name of the 19 highjackers? Why were some of them showing up alive and well and safe in distant ports of call? Why couldn’t we locate Osama bin Laden, a 6 foot 5 man on dialysis? It was not like misplacing ones keys. Mr. Bush said “If you’re not with us, you’re with the terrorists.” My questions subjected me to words like “traitor.” My questions subjected me to ridicule and jokes about tinfoil hats. “If you don’t like this country…get the hell out.” Could anyone know how deeply I loved this country? Could anyone know the heart of an idealist who was once again being sickened by another lie? Could anyone know how much I treasured life? The dinner of deception had been placed on the public table and people were devouring it. Once more I had strayed from the herd unable to graze on the lies and distortions that had been specially prepared for the flock. I sat in a lonely place. On September 11th, 2004, I attended a conference in New York City called “Confronting the Evidence” My friends and I arrived at the Manhattan Center at 7:00, a full hour before the program. The streets were already full. The Manhattan Center probably holds 1000 people and yet there were additional hundreds outside hoping for cancellations. This was a very good sign. Recently a Zogby poll had stated that over 40% of New Yorkers did not believe the official story of the events that transpired on September 11, 2001. Many felt that the 9/11 Commission was nothing more than a whitewash. The evening was hosted by Ed Begley, Jr and co-hosted by Jamey Hecht. The presenters included such notables as Jenna Orkin, World Trade Center Environmental Organization, Kristina Borjesson, author of Into the Buzzsaw, Dr. Robert Bowman, USAF Colonel (retired) president, Institute for Space and Security Studies, Paul Thompson, author of The Terror Timeline, Christopher Scheer, journalist, Los Angeles Times, John Prados, journalist, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Karl Schwarz, chief executive of Global Axxess, Jeff King, M.S, physician and engineer, Webster Tarpley author of The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush (Sr.) , Christopher Bollyn, The American Free Press, Tom Gordon, 9/11 Science and Justice Alliance, David Von Kleist, host of The Power Hour and director of the film “911 In Plane Site” and Barrie Zwicker, filmmaker, “The Great Conspiracy” The evening began with a brief but heart wrenching film called ‘A Tribute to the Fallen” by Mike Berger. Next, Jenna Orkin, for the World Trade Center Environmental Organization, talked about the cover-up of the air poisoning at Ground Zero, the asbestos, mercury and lead that had been released into the air. The EPA lied to the American people and told them that the air was safe to breathe, even allowing the White House to edit their press releases. And since then, over half of our heroes have begun manifesting respiratory problems. There are firefighters who can no longer work and, as a preview of what’s in store for us, 14 rescue dogs have died. The Bush administration was more concerned with opening Wall Street then with the safety of the first responders and the American People. A segment from the film “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American the Empire ” produced by the Media Education Foundation, was shown. This led to a discussion of the Project for a New American Century, known as PNAC, a document that had been crafted in Sept of the year 2000 which, in essence, was a plan for increasing defense spending, preemptive action and use of military force and domination. The creators of PNAC were the same neocons that are running the Bush administration, including the brains behind the plan, Paul Wolfowitz. This project included regime change in Iraq as a central element. The originators of the plan, realized that the American populace would not allow this to happen unless there was an event of catastrophic proportion “A New Pearl Harbor”

9/11 was THAT event. Webster Tarpley gave a superb talk. Mr. Tarpley has a book that will be released in October called 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism Myth of the Twenty-first Century. This book explores the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 as an example of state-sponsored, false-flag terrorism, carried out by a rogue network within the US government – a rogue network which is the current form of the invisible government behind the Iran-contra scandal of 1986-88. Because of the constraints of time, Mr. Tarpley could only touch briefly on the roles of patsies, moles, expert professionals, the controlled corporate media and a privatized command center, as he showed how the empirical evidence around 9/11 made sense. Tarpley demonstrated that the official accounts of the Pentagon crash, the fall of the Twin Towers, the fall of WTC 7, and the crash of United 93 in Shanksville are physically impossible, and the idea that “four misfit highjackers” could pilot commercial jets is beyond the bounds of physical and technical reality. Another dynamic presenter was Dave Von Kleist who showed a portion of his film “9/11 in Plane Site.” Through the use of actual television news footage and eye witness testimony, Mr. Von Kleist presented a most compelling argument disputing the official story on many fronts. Why is there no wreckage or crater from Flight 77 on the lawn of the Pentagon and how does a plane 125 ft wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft across. Von Kleist’s footage showed a “pod” attached to the bottom of “Flight 175” and questioned the reason for its presence. Why did an eye witness report seeing no windows on Flight 175 a commercial United Airlines jetliner? Why were there dozens of reports of bombs and explosions going off around the World Trade Center before any buildings collapsed? These are just a few of the myriad questions asked in Mr. Von Kleists remarkable documentary, a film that should replace Michael Moore’s meager attempt. Karl Schwarz, chief executive of Global Axxess, talked about the Bi-Partisan nature of the elements responsible for the 9/11 tragedy. Mr. Schwarz said that if he had the time, he could have shown a 30 minute power point presentation that has already convinced 30,000 Conservative Republicans not to vote for Bush/Cheney. On a humorous note, Mr. Schwarz told the crowd that he had become a Republican because of Bill and Hillary and had now become an Independent because of the Bush Administration. A small clip from a film called The Collapse of WTC 7, a film by SGTV, was shown. It really crystallized the case that WTC7 was PULLED. The evening was ambitious and the program was complete, including presenters that spanned the political spectrum. Regrettably, I will not be able to do justice to all the speakers and certainly will not be able to communicate the electricity in the room. People were not always in accord, but they were able to give voice to their positions The event posed more questions than answers but these were important questions, questions which needed to be asked. When I left that wonderful evening on September 11, 2004, I was filled with hope. Sure, we did not all agree on everything, but was that a necessary component for our working together to uncover the truth? Yes, there were some egos that were larger than the event itself, but isn’t that to be expected in the world of personalities? If we all had the same goal, couldn’t we band together in deference to the old adage “there’s strength in numbers.” It has been nearly four years since the planes flew into the towers. Has any progress been made? The mainstream media continues to ridicule the truth seekers. The mainstream media continues having the audacity to print bogus articles in such magazines as Popular Mechanics. It shies away from interviews with authors who have published well researched and well documented books on the subject of 9/11. Perhaps the mainstream media realizes that it is no match for the truth. After all, how loud can Sean Hannity yell? As the days grow into years, my sphere becomes increasingly populated with others who share a commitment to the truth. The Internet has brought a vast assortment of like minded people into my world. I will be eternally grateful to this global telephone. Those I have met have provided a “net” to catch me from falling into the abyss of despair. Everyday people may sense something is wrong but they prefer to chase it quickly from their thoughts; feeding their families, making a living and watching television are their rituals and routines for survival. I cannot fault them. I cannot hit them over the head with my “two by four” of Judytruth. I cannot evangelize them into the 9/11 movement. This is something I have slowly learned over the past several years. This is something I am still learning. Will we ever uncover the truth about September 11, 2001? Please do not expect a Hollywood ending from my pen. Should we give up? A resounding “NO.” We owe this much to the victims of 9/11, their families and future generations of American Judy Andreas. Jude10901@aol.com

Fair Usage Law

September 12, 2011   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News  Comments Closed

The Slap on the Wrist Jewish Pedophile Porn Scandal B’nai B’rith, The Organization that Founded the Anti-Defamation League

B’nai Brith Leader Sentenced: 45 Days for Child Rape VideosPublished by admin, on November 2nd, 2010Time is to be served on weekends, plus 240 hours of community service.BILL SURKIS says he downloaded close to nine hours of videos of men raping girls as young as 6 because he is curious by nature and likes to […]

Fair Usage Law

July 3, 2012   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Speech, Israel, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed

Leo Frank, another Jew pedophile child murderer | Neo Nutzi Haters

This is how the enemy Jew was treated before, and this is how he will be treated in the near future. Jew Leo Frank raped and murdered a non-Jewish little girl. The Jews tried to get this beast released, the people gave him the ..

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Leo Frank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Holocaust Does Not Stand Up to 21st Century Scientific and Forensic Studies: Auschwitz, The End of a Legend, Carlo Mattogno

In this meticulously written work, Italian scholar Carlo Mattogno demolishes the boldest attempt yet to answer the revisionist critique of the Auschwitz extermination story.Advance praise forAuschwitz: The End of a Legend (Click Here)Carlo Mattogno has performed yeoman service for the cause of truth by showing how unjustified Jean-Claude Pressac is in reviving once more the […]

Fair Usage Law

June 11, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jews, Judaism, Neo Nazi, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

Canada: Criticism of Israel is the New Anti-Semitism

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/07/20117206368409551.htmlNearly two years after the first hearings were held in Ottawa, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition fto Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) released a detailed report on July 7 that found that anti-Semitism is on the rise in Canada, especially on university campuses.While the CPCCA’s final report does contain some cases of real anti-Semitism, the committee has provided […]

Fair Usage Law

May 28, 2012   Posted in: AIPAC, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Speech, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jewish, Jews, Mossad, Multicultural News, Racism News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, Zionism  Comments Closed

This Day in Jewish History: The Pedophile Scandal, Leo Frank B’nai B’rith President Arrested April 29 for Raping and Strangling 13-year Old Girl

In his 742 page magnum opus about the Leo Frank case, author Steve Oney shamelessly failed to inform the reader of who ultimately solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery in 1913.Spoiler Alert: Leo Frank made an admission during his trial that amounted to a murder confession. On Monday morning April 28, 1913, Leo Frank was […]

Fair Usage Law

April 29, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, David Duke, Holocaust Denial, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, William Luther Pierce, Zionism  Comments Closed

This Day in Jewish American History April 26, 1913, Leo Frank bludgeoned, Raped and Strangled 13-year old Mary Phagan

Confederate Memorial Day, Saturday April 26, 1913, in the National Pencil Company factory of Atlanta, Georgia, 99 years ago today (2012), 29-year old Leo Frank violently beat, raped and strangled 13-year old Mary Phagan. Leo Frank offered $200 to his African-American janitor, Jim Conley, to drag Phagan 150 feet face down across the hard dirt […]

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Holocaust, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Race Relations, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

April 17, This Day in Jewish History: Leo Frank was Born in 1884

The Murder of Little Mary Phagan written by Mary Phagan Kean, Publisher: New Horizon Press; 1st edition (September 15, 1989). The book, ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan’ authored by Mary Phagan Kean (b. 1953), the great grand niece of little Mary Phagan (June 1, 1899 to April 26, 1913) is perhaps the most even-handed […]

Fair Usage Law

April 17, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Christian, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Multicultural News  Comments Closed

Alien Nation by Peter Brimelow

http://www.archive.org/details/Alien_NationAlien NationBy Peter BrimelowE pluribus unum no more? Like most other recent immigrants, former Englishman Brimelow thinks U.S. immigration policy badly needs reforming. Immigration is too high to begin with, he says, but also too many unskilled workers are coming, legally as well as illegally, as are too many persons whose ethnicities differ from the […]

Fair Usage Law

February 18, 2012   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

9-11-2011 Anti-Semitism and the NYC Tragedy 9-11-2001

THE 9/11/01 ATTACK ON THE USAA Position Paper and CommentaryBy Harrell Rhome[Written 9/13/01]DEDICATION AND THESIS STATEMENTWe offer this article with prayer and concern for the innocent victims of oppression, especially those who had no part in the plans and aims of their leaders. May God bless the victims of all atrocities — from Ruby Ridge […]

Fair Usage Law

September 12, 2011   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."