Archive for the ‘Christian’ Category

‘Textbook teaches Christian, not Jewish connection to Jerusalem’ – Arutz Sheva

The Hotam organization criticizes the Education Ministry for introducing textbook presenting Jerusalem as equally holy to three religions.

Yedidia Ben Or, 20/02/17 17:29

Rabbi Amital Bareli, the head of the Hotam organization, sent a letter to Education Minister Naftali Bennett criticizing a sixth grade textbook which presented Jerusalem as equally holy to the three religions and even referred pupils to the New Testament.

The Hotam organization is dedicated to restoring Judaism’s values to the public arena and maintaining Israel’s spiritual development in consonance with its economic, social and scientific development.

Bareli stated that the educational unit designed to teach Jerusalem’s heritage as the historic capital of Israel was worthy and would add a Jewish significance to pupils’ attachment to the city, but the book “In the Paths of Jerusalem” written by Ben Zvi Institute did not aid the adoption of these values.

“In the chapter dealing with Jerusalem written by Tamar Hayardeniit is impossible to find even an allusion to the connection between the Jewish people and the narrative regarding the holiness of Jerusalem,” said Bareli. “Hayardeni presents the approaches of the different religions as an observer in order that they can choose which of them they wish to identify with the city.

Hayardeni sends pupils to the New Testament to find information about Christian ‘Saints’ and to see the description of Jesus’s birth. She also refers to the “connection between David and Jesus: Jews believe that the Messiah will be a descendant of David and so do the Christians.”

Bareli claimed that this both weakens the basis of the Jewish nation to maintain sovereignty over Jerusalem and also weakens the connection of school children to Jewish tradition. He added

“We may yet be sorry to find a generation to whom Jerusalem means nothing from a national and traditional point of view and this absurdly when the Education Ministry has taken upon itself the task of transmitting the values of Jerusalem to Israeli pupils. I call on you, Minister Bennett, to investigate the matter properly and ascertain if there is a place for such a book in the educational unit on Jerusalem.”

View post:
‘Textbook teaches Christian, not Jewish connection to Jerusalem’ – Arutz Sheva

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

United Nations Identified as Christian vs. Muslim Battleground for Final War of Messiah – Breaking Israel News

For they have consulted together with one consent: against thee do they make a covenant. Psalms 83:6 (The Israel Bible)

(Breaking Israel News)

In a startling lecture, a noted rabbi labelled the anti-Israel movement prevalent in global politics today as the first stage in a two-part End of Days prophecy, noting that this stage, a Christian-Muslim alliance, is ending as Americas new president severs ties with the Islamic world. Another rabbi agrees, suggesting the absurdity that has come out of the anti-Israel UN is only an indication that the next stage, a Muslim-Christian conflict, will be even stranger.

Rabbi Zamir Cohen, a noted scholar and head of the Beitar Illit Yeshiva, stated that in the End of Days, Christianity and Islam will separate into two distinct groups working in unison against the Jewish People as part of a pre-Messianic two-stage political process

They will come together against Israel, said Rabbi Zamir Cohen, a noted scholar and head of the Beitar Illit Yeshiva, in a recent lecture. He went on to describe a second stage of the process in which the alliance was broken and the Christians began helping the Jews. When they come against us, there will break out a conflict between them, and then they will strike at each other.

Rabbi Shimon Apisdorf, a prominent Jewish educator and bestselling author, agreed, saying that the first stage has already happened: Islam and Christianity have aligned against Israel and the union has manifested in a notoriously anti-Israel international body.

The epicenter of this united effort against Israel is most apparent in the United Nations, stated Rabbi Apisdorf to Breaking Israel News.

This alliance defies logic, the rabbi said, citing a recent speech by Nikki Haley, the newly appointed US ambassador to the UN. A newcomer to the UN, Haley was astounded at what she saw at her first Security Council meeting.

The prejudiced approach to Israeli-Palestinian issuesbears no relationship to the reality of the world around us, Haley said in a press conference last week. The double standards are breathtaking.

Rabbi Apisdorf agreed with Haleys assessment, saying that the UN joint effort against Israel was unrealistic and absurd, but it had been prophesied to be so. He quoted the Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki, a French rabbi from the eleventh century known by the acronym Rashi.

In his commentary on the first verse in Genesis, Rashi predicted that in the end of days, the non-Jews would all come together, uniting in order to dispute the Jews right to the land of Israel. The UN did exactly this, claiming there is is no connection between Judaism and Jerusalem, a claim that would have been thought absurd just a few years ago.

Rabbi Cohen believes the first stage, the unity of Arabs and Christians, is nearing its end, and that the second stage has already begun. In his lecture, Rabbi Cohen said the second stage would begin when a leader arose to unify the Christians against Islam.

According to our prophecies, some revolutionary Christian leader will arise who will be disgusted by everything that is happening, said Rabbi Cohen. He will unite the Christian world around him, that is to say Islam will turn into one group, and Christianity into one group.

In a previous lecture given just after the US elections, Rabbi Cohen speculated that Donald Trump might indeed be this prophesied leader. He noted that President Trumps unrestrained style of speech is precisely what will join Christians together against the alliance with Islam promoted by the previous president.

This is unprecedented, something we have yet to see in the world, a leader who stands up and says that he has had enough of the trespasses of Islam, Rabbi Cohen said.

A conflict focusing the combined forces of Christianity and Islam against Israel is a terrifying prospect, but according to Rabbi Cohen, this conflict, the war of Gog and Magog, serves a definite purpose.

If we look at it from the side of a divine accounting, what purpose does the conflict serve? the Rabbi asks. When it comes time for the Moshiach (Messiah) to come, let it come, without this conflict.

Rabbi Cohen answered his own question by stating that the main purpose of the war of Gog and Magog is to pay back the Gentiles for all the troubles they caused the Jews throughout history.

The Christians and Muslims will split, becoming two groups that strike each other, explained Rabbi Cohen, but the conflict can take two forms: one that will be difficult and painful for the Jews and another form in which the Jews escape unharmed.

If the Jews correct our mistakes, our blemishes, then the war of Gog and Magog will come only to pay back the other nations for the evil they did to the Jews in the past. If, on the other hand, the Jews have not fixed themselves, then God will use the war of Gog and Magog to pressure us to return us to the correct path.

Read more here:
United Nations Identified as Christian vs. Muslim Battleground for Final War of Messiah – Breaking Israel News

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

What A 19th-Century Christian Educator Taught Me About Jewish Home Schooling In Age Of Betsy DeVos – Forward

The contentious confirmation of Betsy DeVos as education secretary provoked a fair number of outraged folks to threaten to exercise their own right to school choice and home-school their children. Timing-wise, this announcement coincided with Orthodox Jewish parents starting to get their tuition bills for the next school year. One friend in New York City, a working mother with two toddlers, will be shelling out almost $42,000 next year just in tuition for less than full days in school (plus nanny costs). That is just ridiculous, she complained to me. I could just fire my nanny and hire an entry level teacher for that.

Generations ago the English did exactly that, and called the woman a governess. And it is the woman who spearheaded the governess educational philosophy who I intend to follow when I create my own future home school (as, currently, my children are a touch young for a curriculum).

There are a dozen or more popular home school philosophies and methodologies, including classical education, Montessori and unschooling (where students direct the lesson plans), and countless more companies with products marketed toward home-schoolers, selling everything from educational toys to math programs. The program we will follow, conceived by Charlotte Mason (1842-1923), eschews most of the trendier (and pricier) options in the American home school market.

In 1984, a book by Susan Schaeffer Macaulay titled For The Childrens Sake introduced Mason to mainstream audiences, popularizing her theories for a new generation of parents. Masons method is best known for its two main attributes: a dedication to appreciating the very best that the arts (literature, art, music) has to offer and a reverence for nature, for it is the truest expression of Gods hand in our lives, which we can see with every snowfall, every sunrise and sunset, and more.

We attempt to define a person, Mason wrote, as quoted on the Charlotte Mason Institute website, the most common-place person we know, but he will not submit to bounds; some unexpected beauty of nature breaks out; we find he is not what we thought, and begin to suspect that every person exceeds our power of measurement.

Sitting in a conference room in Maryland recently, listening to Carroll Smith, director of the Mason Institute, lecture on the finer points of how to deliver a Charlotte Mason education, I realized these were the same things that drew me to Judaism as a young child namely, an appreciation for reading and for God in our everyday lives.

One of the keys to a Mason education is the reading of living books, books written by one author who takes a special interest in his or her subject. For example, if youre studying the Civil War, read a literary narrative either by someone from that time period or from a contemporary expert on the subject instead of just a broad textbook. Depending on age, a student might read a firsthand account of fighting for the Union or the South, or James Swansons best-seller, Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase For Lincolns Killer, which recounts the search for John Wilkes Booth.

Mason explained that it is living books above all others that engage readers, spark the imagination and remain in our memory long after theyve finished the last chapter. After each reading, the student narrates what has just been read, or retells the story. How did God impart His laws and lessons to the Jews? Through a narrative story: the Torah. And how do we still learn it? By narrating the story over and over and over in classrooms, in living rooms, in synagogues, at Seder tables. This is what God demanded of us in Deuteronomy 6:6 and 7: These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.

In an article on parenting for MyJewishLearning, Rabbi Nachum Amsel said, Possibly the most important educational principle for a Jewish parent to adhere to is the notion of bringing up each child according to his or her unique personality, character traits and talents (Proverbs 22:6). 1Mason concurs. A cornerstone of her educational philosophy is this: Children are born persons. What does this mean? Children are not empty vessels. Our methodology should therefore match our beliefs, and a school environment filled with textbooks and worksheets is not how we can impart a tailored education to a unique child.

As with many home school communities, the Charlotte Mason world is Christian dominated. Every book written on her philosophy is from a Christian point of view. And at a recent conference in suburban Maryland that attracted about 150 audience members, Im pretty certain I was the only Jew.

In fact, Mason experts frequently discuss the dearth of Jewish families who follow Masons teachings. While God is a central part of Masons work, those who follow her teachings also have a lot of Jesus Christ thrown into the mix. Still, given the high levels of unhappiness with education choices facing many Jewish families, its remarkable that home-schooling hasnt caught on more among Jews.

Considering the shared philosophical views between Mason and our religion, if more Jewish families were aware of the option, and of her beliefs, this might no longer be the case.

__Bethany Mandel is a regular columnist for the Forward. Follow her on Twitter, @bethanyshondark_

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Read more from the original source:
What A 19th-Century Christian Educator Taught Me About Jewish Home Schooling In Age Of Betsy DeVos – Forward

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Jewish Theology A Primer (Especially for Christians) Part I – Patheos (blog)

Perhaps a better title for this next series of posts would be Jewish theologies because its hard to argue that theres really one Jewish theology. How many Jewish theologies are there? Well, to adapt the old joke, if you have three Jewish theologians, you have at least six (or more) Jewish theologies.

Over the next several posts, Id like to offer insights on Jewish theology especially for Christians. Why? For two primary reasons: 1) I have many, many Christian friends who I dialog with theologically and philosophically; 2) I believe that most Christians would benefit from engaging, and even applying, some of the ideas, approaches, methodologies, and themes of Jewish theology into their own Christian contexts and self understanding.

I believe that Jewish approaches to theology have much to offer Christians. Besides, the conversation is hopefully interesting to Jews, too.

In this first post, Id like to explore the oddness of Jewish theology and how authority in Jewish theology operates and doesnt operate.

The Oddness of Jewish Theology

I wont pretend to be able to do Jewish theology justice in just a few blog posts. A few thousand years of wisdom isnt easy to summarize or treat lightly. Besides, Jewish theology covers all of life how to treat animals, when to harvest trees, how to love your neighbor, what not to eat, how to wage war, how to value peace, the relationship between spouses, the nature of God, the meaning of redemption, and so on.

Doing theology doesnt garner the same attention and interest in most Jewish circles as it does in Christianity. One reason for this is that Jews dont have a religious culture that revolves around theological discussion (Discussion? Yes, Formal theological discussion? No.) Another reason is that Judaism understands itself as a peoplehood connected through history, practice, and values, whereas Christianity, while certainly community oriented, is rooted more in ideas about the world, God, and Jesus, rather than an ethnic-cultural identity. Youre a Christian based on what you believe. Youre a Jew according to other criteria.

Jewish scholar Louis Jacobs offers this:

Jewish theologydefined as the systematic consideration of what adherents of the Jewish religion believe or are expected to believeis notoriously elusive, so much so that voices have been raised to question whether there really is any such thing. Certainly there is no department of Jewish theology, as there is of Christian, at any university. Even in the foremost higher institutions of specifically Jewish learning, such as the Hebrew Union College, the Jewish Theological Seminary and Yeshiva University in the USA, Jews College and Leo Baeck College in the UK, where Jewish theology can hardly be ignored, the subject is often treated with amused tolerance as peripheral to the major interests of both teachers and students. The Queen of the Sciences may have been dethroned in Christendom, but, judging by their neglect, many Jewish teachers deny that she ever enjoyed regal status in the first place. Louis Jacobs

Additionally, Jewish theology is diverse not all Jews would agree with my interpretations or the views of other Jewish thinkers for that matter.

Further, no Jew can definitively speak for another Jew in terms of theology. Each Jewish branch, each community approaches matters with nuance, difference, and a particular style. My vantagepoint is Reform Judaism and therefore, my theology will be appropriately colored by the Reform tradition although my insights apply beyond the Reform context.

Authority in Jewish Theology

There is no central Jewish authority no rabbi, text, book, or committee that conveys a binding Jewish orthodoxy. Judaism, likewise, is not creedal there isnt a list of beliefs one must subscribe to in order to be Jewish or to be acceptable in most Jewish communities.

Granted, some Orthodox Jewish communities will insist that there is a set of required Jewish dogma along with a group of orthodox rabbis who may authoritatively pronounce on them. But these groups are small within Judaism, and the bulk of Jewish theology and sources especially the Talmud thousands of pages of rabbinic commentary seem to demonstrate otherwise. The Talmud rarely sees the rabbis agree and the nature of the conversations are open ended.

Like Catholicism, Judaism has sacred writings (Torah) and tradition (Talmud, teaching, scholarship, practices, rituals, liturgy). Like Catholicism, Judaism has a long history of rich and beautiful observances. Like Catholicism, many Jews have a sacramental view of their religious rituals and practices. And like Catholicism, halakhah is somewhat ( this is a little bit of a stretch) akin to Canon Law. Yet unlike Catholicism, there is no Jewish magisterium and no Jewish pope.

Then how is unity realized? How is Jewish tradition and meaning preserved?

I think the best answer is to realize that Judaism is an ongoing, few thousand years old, conversation. To be part of that conversation is a voluntary undertaking and to engage it is to accept the parameters and topics of that conversation, traditionally outlined under the three broad headings of God, Torah, and Israel. Which for Catholics and other Christians might be God/Jesus, Scripture, and Church.

Underneath those broad headings, discussions about revelation, the nature of God, morality, liturgy, ritual, blessings, scripture scholarship, observance and a whole host of other issues takes place.

Like Anglicanism and Christian Eastern Orthodoxy, consensus plays a large role in establishing theological parameters and context. While no single authoritative religious institution makes decisions for all forms of Judaism, a consensus develops among communities, rabbis, scholars, and, over time, enough people join the common cause so that a given position becomes commonplace although, not binding.

There isnt a theological litmus test. Ones theological opinions and offerings may be rejected by other Jews; they will almost certainly be argued with by other Jews argument and engagement is perhaps the foundational method for Jewish theology.

When I explain this to some people, especially Christians, the response is often, well, then the Torah is your authority, right? To which I reply, No. Torah is part of the written record of the ongoing conversation, and serves as a primary parameter for meaningful Jewish dialog. Yet Torah is a set of writings, and a set of writings can never be authoritative Jews dont do Sola Scriptura writings always require interpretation, and Judaism has no infallible or authoritative interpreters every Jew interprets for themselves. (We were way ahead of Luther.)

Another common response, isnt your rabbi in charge? Dont the rabbis decide these things? Again, the answer is, No. Rabbis are trained to teach and interpret, and various groups of rabbis will offer commentary and opinion, but again, in most forms of Judaism, these opinion, or responsa are not binding. (Also, Christians are often surprised to learn that strictly speaking, a rabbi isnt necessary for a Jewish wedding, liturgy, blessings, or even conversions.) Rabbis can and should guide the community in theological matters and questions of observance, but theyre not granted or imbued with any special religious authority. Some Orthodox communities do give their rabbis binding authority, but thats particular to their specific community.

Sources of Unity

How does Jewish theology not descend into chaos then, wonder many not accustomed to a lack of central authority?

Part of the answer is the Jewish focus on orthopraxy rather than orthodoxy. Granted, this distinction is somewhat artificial, but it does convey a reality. Jews tend to be more or less united in their practice lighting Shabbat candles and observing the Sabbath. Celebrating the (many) Jewish holidays. Engaging Torah (and Talmud, and Jewish authors and thinkers.) And practicing well established Jewish values such as hospitality, love of neighbor, care for the needy, and seeking to end oppression of all kinds.

Another part of the answer is how many synagogues function. The word synagogue comes from Greek and implies one view or a unity of perspective or community. The synagogue is more than the meeting place for worship its, in theory, the center for the Jewish community. Its activities, discussions, socializing, and worship all which help create a common life would help promote unity within the community despite diversity of beliefs.

Finally, as mentioned above, Jewish theology has fairly distinct parameters Torah, halakhah, holidays, a distinct history, the notion of God, Israel, traditions, texts, and so on. Various Jewish thinkers and sages have offered various ideas and meanings within these parameters, but theyve stayed within the lines so to speak. Someone who tries to take the conversation too far off topic would likely be pulled back in or eventually ignored. And Jewish theological reasoning relies heavily on Jewish sources sui generis arguments rarely find traction.

There are Christian communities that operate in similar style. One thinks of various Baptist groups, Congregationalists, and even, to some degree, the Episcopal Church. But even within these denominations, the parameters of orthodoxy would be somewhat tighter than that found in Judaism.

In our next posts, I hope to discuss some of these parameters and offer Jewish insights concerning their role and meaning.

As always, I enjoy engaging with you feel free to comment. Id especially enjoy hearing from Christian reads on these topics. And dont feel you need to agree with me to engage. As long as the comment is on topic and respectful, Ill do my best to respond to you.

Read more here:
Jewish Theology A Primer (Especially for Christians) Part I – Patheos (blog)

Fair Usage Law

February 18, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Christian Genocide Survivors Deserve Support and Priority – Morning Consult

When I visited Erbil, Iraq, in December with a congressional delegation determined to find out why Christians had often been excluded from U.S. aid programs, Archbishop Nicodemus Daoud of Mosul told us that Americans generally care more about endangered frogs than about endangered Christian communities.

He has a point.

Christians have lived in the region for almost 2,000 years. Many still speak the language of Jesus. But although they, and other minority communities, are now seriously endangered, some Americans seem more worried that they might get priority than that they might disappear completely.

The Islamic State terror group, also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh and its antecedents imposed a strict religious test and then targeted minority religious communities for elimination. At best, these communities fled, but lost everything in the process.

Those who are outraged that we might now prioritize them are forgetting Americas proud tradition of prioritizing genocide survivors, and the dark moments when we ignored them.

After horrifically refusing admission to Jewish refugees on theS.S. St. Louis in 1939, the United States later changed course and numericallyprioritized displaced European Jews. They had suffered a uniquely horrible targeting even if there were more German, French and Italian refugees, who were also displaced and suffering.

During and after World War I as well, the U.S. government worked with Near Eastern Reliefto aid Armenian and other Christian communitiestargeted for genocide by the Ottoman Empire. The American people solidly supported the effort.

Itis notun-American to prioritize those who have been targeted for genocide because of their faith. It has been seen as quintessentially American for a century.

And religious persecution has long been a key qualifier for refugee status under our immigration laws.

When theLautenberg amendmentwas renewed with bipartisan support in 2015, no one was outraged. It prioritizes for asylum those who are Christian, Jewish and Bahai, as well as other religious minorities from Iran.

Notably, the Obama administrations official policy was also to prioritize Christian and other religious minority refugees from Syria. Knox Thames, the Obama administrations State Department special advisor for religious minorities, wrote in October 2015:

Due to the unique needs of vulnerable religious minority communities, the State Department has prioritized the resettlement of Syrian Christian refugees and other religious minorities fleeing the conflict.

The policy failed to deliver. Only abouthalf of one percentof Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S.in fiscal year2016 were Christian though they make up 10 percent of the Syrian population.Yazidis and Shia Muslims were also profoundly underrepresented.Again, there was no uproar over the stated policy, and little coverage of its failure.

So the outrage is new, but policies claiming to prioritize Christians and other minorities are not.

What is deeply troubling is how often U.S. government aid overlooked the needs of these minority groups since 2014.

Last year, our government for only the second time in history formally declared an ongoing situation was a genocide. Secretary of State John Kerry explained that this genocide was one of religious persecution, saying: The fact is that Daesh kills Christians because they are Christians; Yezidis because they are Yezidis; Shia because they are Shia.Those words should have triggered Americas duty to help these targeted groups.

Instead, Christians and other small communities targeted by ISIS genocidal campaign have often been last in line, not first,to get U.S. government assistance.

While the U.S. government and the United Nations have spent heavily on humanitarian relief in the wake of ISIS, the largest community of displaced Christians in Erbil has received no money from our government or from the UN, according to Archbishop Bashar Warda, who is caring for tens of thousands of those displaced there.

It is the same story for many Yazidis.

In Iraq last spring, I met Yazidi families living next to an open sewer in Ozal City. Except for two kilograms of lamb in 2014, they had receivednothingfrom the U.S. government, andnothingfrom the UN. Only Iraqi Christians themselves overlooked by these entities had helped them.

Far from receiving priority, communities most at risk of disappearing have received nothing at all from our government.

The reason U.S. and UN officials gave in Iraq this past May for overlooking these groups was that their aid prioritized only individual needs. If someone was hungry, they got aid, but the fact that a group could disappear entirely was never even considered.

Helping everyone typically means aid is sent to major refugee camps, resulting in thede factoexclusion of minority communities, since they have been targeted by extremists within these camps, and thus avoid them. It effectively means many religious minorities receivenohelp.

That American government aid to these groups is long overdue has until now been a subject of bipartisan agreement, not controversy.

The fact is that Americas lack of response to religious minorities has allowed ISIS program of eliminating these people from the region to continue.

While ISIS may applaud American inaction toward these communities over the past two years, neither the religious minorities in the Middle East, nor the judgment of history will do the same.

Giving preference does not mean helpingonlygenocide survivors. But not giving them preference likely means they will soon be beyond help.

They could soon be completely eradicated.

Will anyone be outraged then?

Andrew Walther is the vice president of communications for the Knights of Columbus andhas been involved in humanitarian aid, public awareness and public policy initiatives for those persecuted by ISIS since 2014.

Morning Consult welcomes op-ed submissions on policy, politics and business strategy in our coverage areas. Submission guidelines can be foundhere.

See more here:
Christian Genocide Survivors Deserve Support and Priority – Morning Consult

Fair Usage Law

February 17, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

FBI: White Supremacist Says He Planned to Kill Jews ‘In the Spirit of Dylann Roof’ – Daily Beast

A Christian extremist was arrested after he allegedly threatened to massacre a South Carolina synagogue just like his idol did at a black church.

A white supremacist planned a terror attack in the spirit of Dylann Roof on a South Carolina synagogue, the FBI alleges.

Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, of Conway, South Carolina was arrested Wednesday for allegedly attempting to buy a gun from an undercover agent posing as a hitman for the Aryan Nations. McDowell is a convicted felon and legally prohibited from buying firearms. McDowell allegedly sought the weapon after spending the past month writing Facebook posts about murdering Jews and praising Roof, who was convicted of murdering nine black churchogers in Charleston in June 2016.

According to an FBI affidavit filed Thursday, McDowells internet activity suggested that he set his sights on the Temple Emanu-El, a conservative synagogue in Myrtle Beach.

I love love to act what u think, [sic] he wrote in a December Facebook post linking to the churchs website.

Contacted by The Daily Beast on Thursday, the temple declined to comment, citing an ongoing investigation.

McDowell had already been convicted on multiple felony charges of animal abuse, violent burglary, larceny, drugs, and assault. During his time in prison for those offenses, police said he developed connections to white supremacists.

According to the FBI, McDowell elaborated on his preferred form of action on Facebook.

Dylann roof did what these tattoos wearing so badass is supposed to be doing they don’t give f*** about their white race, he wrote on January 5. All they wanne do is stay loaded on drugs the Jews put here to destory white man and they feast on the drugs. they should be Feasting on the enemy that stole their Heritage and their bloodline and trying to run us off of this Earth you can post pictures off****** Viking and swords all the s*** you want to post if you ain’t got the heart to fight for Yahweh like dylann roof did you need to shut the f******up damn right I’m pissed off when I see a f******white young and disable beat him to death before f******n****** and white people running:their f******mouth not doing nothing!!!!!! !damn right I’m pissed off’.

The following day, McDowell allegedly sent a Facebook message to an undercover FBI agent posing as a member of the Aryan Nations. McDowell asked for iron, slang for a gun.

When McDowell met the undercover agent at a Myrtle Beach hotel several days later, he supposedly told the agent that screaming white power would not be enough to accomplish his goals.

“I got the heart to do that shit, but I don’t have the good training,” the agent quoted McDowell saying.

McDowell said Roof inspired him to take up arms.

“I seen what Dylann Roof did and in my heart I reckon I got a little bit of hatred and I I want to do that shit. Like, I got desire … not for nobody else it just… I want something where I can say, ‘I fucking did that’ … me personally … If l could do something on a fucking big scale and write on the fucking building or whatever, ‘In the spirit of Dylann Roof.”‘

But unlike Roof, who was arrested and later sentenced to death, McDowell told the agent he planned to get off with murder scot-free.

But he continued to post his murderous intent to Facebook even after the meeting.

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

Clean up world jewelry [sic] in the name of Yahweh, he wrote on January 25, in apparent reference to Jewry.

Heidi Beirich, director of the Southern Poverty Law Centers Intelligence Project said the language was a call-out to sect of white supremacist Christianity.

Where he talks about cleaning up world jewry in the name of Yahweh, thats a term for God thats used by members of a particular Christian sect: a white supremacist version called Christian Identity, Beirich told The Daily Beast. The language in here shows he was deeper into white supremacist thinking. Its not some surface-level thing. If he knew about Yahweh and he knew about Christian Identity, hed been spending some time studying white supremacy.

Anti-Semitic hate crimes have surged since Donald Trumps election. In New York City, Jews were the victim of twice as many hate crimes in the first two months of 2017 than during that same period in 2016, the according to the NYPD. Jewish centers nationwide have reported a spike in graffiti and threatening phone calls, with approximately 60 bomb threats called into Jewish community centers in January, CNN reports.

In his January 25 post, McDowell called on white supremacists to be more like Roof.

I wish the day we all get off Facebook and white Warriors like we was born to be like Dylan roof but we gotta do it in a smart away and it takes a team it takes no drugs and party and more planning for the real Victory and not just saying it but should want Bloodshed 2 crave it and be a fanatic for your white race and for Yahweh God they’ve been murder and.killed our birth rites of our white race, he wrote.

The following day, McDowell allegedly called the undercover agent to explain his plans.

“I just be plotting it out, like, I mean you just run up there on them if they back there partying, and all, with a fucking AK and rip them sumbitches down, and throw, a damn, something at them, McDowell allegedly told the agent. He asked the agent to buy him a gun and ammunition.

The alleged murder plot went on hold for weeks, after McDowell allegedly told agents that his mother would not allow him to continue using her cell phone for calls. There was also the matter of paying for the gun and ammunition; McDowell allegedly told agents he needed to ask his grandfather for money. None of McDowells family members returned The Daily Beasts requests for comment.

But on February 11, McDowell allegedly called the agent to say the plot was back on. They agreed to meet at a Myrtle Beach Hampton Inn to finish the deal.

McDowell arrived at the hotel on February 15 with $109 in hand to allegedly buy the gun. Instead, he found himself swarmed by federal agents. He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on Tuesday, a state official told The Daily Beast.

I think this was a guy who was pretty well ensconced in white supremacist thinking, down to the point where he knew the slogans, the buzzwords, and so on, the SPLCs Beirich said. Im not surprised to see him praising Dylann Roof. Hes not the only white supremacist who sees Dylann Roof as a hero, a martyr to the cause.

Read the original here:
FBI: White Supremacist Says He Planned to Kill Jews ‘In the Spirit of Dylann Roof’ – Daily Beast

Fair Usage Law

February 17, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

A Muslim scholar sets out to investigate Jesus Christ – America Magazine

Mustafa Aykol, a practicing Muslim who writes a column for The International New York Times, begins his book by relating how one day in Istanbul he received a copy of the New Testament from a Christian missionary. Before going to sleep he opened it to the Gospel of Matthew and quickly became fascinated. Within a couple of weeks he had finished the entire New Testament. While there were parts of it he as a Muslim could not accept, much was not contradictory to his own faith, and parts were strikingly similar to the Quran. Like a good investigative journalist, he began a study of the Jewish, Christian and Muslim sources that come together in the story of Jesus of Nazareth. This book is the result.

The book traces the complex relations between the Gospels, Judaism and Islam. From the beginning the author contrasts Pauline Christianity, with its emphasis on the divinity of Jesus, with early Jewish Christianity, especially as it comes to expression in the Q sayings source, the Epistle of James and later Jewish-Christian sects like the Ebionites. How to explain the startling connections between the theology of the Jewish followers of Jesus who saw him as the promised messiah but not divine and the Arab followers of Muhammad?

Jesus is honored in the Quran as born of the Virgin Mary, the Messiah of the Jews and a reformer but not divine; he appears in 93 verses in 15 different Quranic chapters. Akyol shows parallels between a number of Quranic stories of Jesus and Mary with some of the apocryphal gospels, the Protoevangelium of James, the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, the Arabic Infancy Gospel and the Infancy Gospel of Thomasfor example, the story of Jesus making birds out of clay and then giving them lifeimaginative stories rejected by mainstream Christianity. As a Muslim, Akyol believes in the Quran as divinely revealed, though he suggests that the similarities show that the Quran was in dialogue with various traditions present at its time of origin, both the apocryphal gospels and various Jewish-Christian sects, some of which believed in the virgin birth. He sees another parallel in the expression Two Ways, appearing in both the Didache, a late-first-century Christian text, and the Quran, which offers salvation to those who are devoted to God and benevolent toward other humansin other words, salvation through faith and good works, not faith alone, as in the Protestant understanding of Pauline Christianity. This is the teaching of Jewish Christianity, reflected in the Epistle of James.

But his contrast of early Jewish and Pauline Christianity is much too facile. He falls into an approach first popularized by liberal Protestant theology of speaking of the Platonization (or Hellenization) of Christianity, making recognition of the divinity of Jesus a late development, an approach long since abandoned by mainstream scholars. The churchs high Christology is rooted in the Jesus of history, in his use, at the time unprecedented, of the familial term Abba in his prayer, the fact that he referred to himself as Son and in his claim to authority to interpret the Mosaic law and proclaim the forgiveness of sins, both of which scandalized his contemporaries. Theologians as critical as Walter Kasper and Edward Schillebeeckx find evidence that Jesus understood his death as tied in with his mission, promising his disciples a renewed fellowship beyond it.

Akyol does not seem to appreciate how the churchs Christological language developed slowly within the New Testament period as the early Christians reread their experience of Jesus against their Jewish tradition. For example, while Marks Christology is still inchoate and his use of Son of God did not mean what it would mean two decades later, there are clues that he is struggling to express a mystery that goes beyond the language available to him. His account of Jesus walking on the water is clearly a theophany, using the expression, He meant to pass by them (Mk 6:48), jarring in context, to echo a verse in the Book of Job where Yahweh walks on the the crests of the sea and might pass by (Job 9:8, 11).

From the beginning, both Jewish and gentile Christians used the divine title Lord (Mari or Maran in Aramaic, Kurios in Greek) for Jesus. The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (third to second centuries B.C.E.), used Kurios to translate the Hebrew Adonai, which took the place of the holy name Yahweh. Jewish Christians used Mar to avoid pronouncing the divine name. Even the Epistle of James refers to Jesus consistently as Lord or the Lord Jesus Christ. Larry Hurtado points out that Paul can use the Aramaic invocation Maranatha, Our Lord, come (1 Cor 16:22), to his largely Gentile church at Corinth without translating it, as it was certainly familiar to them. He notes that Jesus, from very early in the Christian movement, was the object of the prayer and worship ordinarily reserved for God and that there is evidence of pre-existence theology even prior to Paul. Akyol pays little attention to the Gospel of John beyond commenting on its high Christology. But John is a very Jewish Gospel; its Prologue, which most probably predates the Gospel, speaks of Jesus as the divine Word, active in creation, a recasting of the Wisdom theology that developed in the late Old Testament.

In spite of the authors efforts to explain the churchs Christology in terms of an aberrant tradition, there is much to recommend in this study. Akyol writes with a clarity that is admirable, and the book is well researched. (The footnotes take up 55 pages.) He finds common themes within the Scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, the People of the Book, a term originating in the Quran. Both Muslims and Christians can learn from it. Muslims might see in the example of Jesus inspiration to focus on the spirit of their tradition rather than legalistic or fundamentalist interpretations, or his teaching that the lawwhether Torah or Shariahis for man rather than man (and woman) for the law, or his words in Lk 17:21, The kingdom of God is within you, for Akyol evidence that Jesus transformed the kingdom of Godwhich Muslims would call the caliphatefrom a political kingdom into a spiritual one. Christians will be introduced to a more irenic vision of Islam, one that has come to terms with modernity. The fact that the sacred texts of Judaism, Christianity and Islam have far more in common than is generally known should lead to greater mutual respect and to the reconciliation so needed today.

View original post here:
A Muslim scholar sets out to investigate Jesus Christ – America Magazine

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Baptist leaders tour Israel – Jerusalem Post Israel News

The Baptist leaders at the IFCJ-supported Beit Gilboa orphanage.. (photo credit:IFCJ)

The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews sponsored a trip to the Holy Land for 14 Baptist leaders, to get a firsthand view of the work the Jewish state and The Fellowship are doing.

The hope is that after their return home, these leaders will take that message to their congregants in order to strengthen Christian support for Israel.

We are honored to welcome these outstanding Baptist leaders in Israel, said Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder and president of The Fellowship. This important mission will not only strengthen the powerful connection between Christians and Jews, but will remind Israel and the Jewish people of the unconditional love and support we receive from our Christian friends.

In recent years, The Fellowship has been reaching out to the African-American Christian community, building bridges and solidifying ties based on historic relationships forged in the Civil Rights era. Primarily, they have been working together to advocate for the Jewish state against the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, and they have jointly protested instances of antisemitic activity.

In 2015, The Fellowship first hosted 21 ministers from the Detroit-based Pentecostal Church of God In Christ, while in January 2016, 22 top clergy of the Washington, DC-based Progressive National Baptist Convention, the movement of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., came to Israel on a trip sponsored by The Fellowship. Also in May of last year, 26 leaders of the NBCA came to Israel with The Fellowship, and last September the IFCJ brought 22 leaders from the Bahamas-based Global United Fellowship to Israel.

Thanks to The Fellowship, this trip will help us build bridges with the Jewish people while helping us to serve our congregations and in turn to serve God, said Rev. Samuel Tolbert, a trip leader and president of the National Baptist Convention of America (NBCA), said prior to the trip.

They have been here since February 14, and will be returning February 20, touring Jewish and Christian holy sites. Their stops included the Mount of Beatitudes and the Sea of Galilee, the Western Wall and the Old City of Jerusalem, and archeological sites such as Caesarea, Mount Tabor, and Megiddo.

The church group also visited Fellowship projects that support Ethiopian-Israeli immigrants and the elderly, and visit Yad Vashem, Israels memorial to the victims of the Holocaust, and the Holocaust History Museum.

Steven T. Mack, the senior pastor of the historic Little Rock Baptist Church in Camden, New Jersey, has been documenting some of the groups day trips on Facebook. Upon seeing the locations that he would regularly speak about the pulpit he couldnt contain his excitement.

I have often preached from 1 Kings 18:16-45. This is the view from Mount Carmel, where Elijah stood against the prophets of Baal! he wrote.

To learn more about Jewish-Christian relations, check us out at @christian_jpost, on Facebook.com/jpostchristianworld/ and see the best of the Holy Land in The Jerusalem Post – Christian Edition monthly magazine.

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

Prev Article

The fulfillment of Ezekiel 36

Link:
Baptist leaders tour Israel – Jerusalem Post Israel News

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Behind Trump’s moves: A Christian resurgence – Jewish Journal – Jewish Journal

As many American Jews and Jewish organizations join in combatting the recent executive order on immigration and refugees, it is important to realize that the anti-Muslim sentiments of the new administration are one head of a two-headed beast.

The other head is a political agenda forged by a coalition of conservative Christians that is closer than ever to achieving its vision of a Christian nation. This linkage between anti-Muslim and pro-Christian policies is revealed in the executive order, which couples a thinly veiled ban on Muslims with a thinly veiled preference for Christians from predominantly Muslim countries seeking refuge in the United States.

President Donald J. Trump justified the priority given to Christians over Muslims by stating, If you were a Muslim, you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible.

That line is lifted directly from the Christian right, which has long promoted the idea that Christians are a indeed, the most persecuted minority. The belief that Christians are being subjected to religious persecution in America by intolerant secularists has joined the claim that liberals turn a blind eye to the persecution of Christians by Muslims. Both are staples of the worldview that drives Stephen Bannon, the presidents chief strategist and architect of his immigration policies. Bannons unorthodox brand of Christian conservatism is reflected in his admiration for traditionalist Catholics who oppose the current pope, as well as for the newly resurgent Russian Orthodox Church, whose combination of Islamophobia and homophobia has proven to be intoxicating to legions of civilizational conservatives who view the West as locked in a theological battle to the death with Islam. Bannons alliance with conservatives inside the Vatican is likewise based on their shared belief that Western civilization is being besieged from the outside by Muslims and from the inside by the forces of secularism, more particularly, by liberals who support an array of decadent values and refuse to recognize a civilizational war between Christianity and Islam.

Bannons characterization of the West in his 2014 speech to the Vatican as the Judeo-Christian West might lead some to believe his Christian worldview will protect Jews even as it constitutes a clear and present danger to Muslims. This belief is wrong on two counts. First, it reflects an unjustifiable disregard for the rights of the Other. Second, being folded into a homogenized Judeo-Christianity now is no guarantee that Jews will not be stigmatized or marginalized later, or that the distinctive harms of anti-Semitism (including Christian anti-Semitism) will not be rendered invisible, as already occurred in Trumps botched Holocaust statement that omitted any reference to Jews.

The same concerns hold for the rest of the conservative Christian agenda, which aims to expand protections for religious liberty and to weaken the wall of separation between church and state. Both of these goals have attracted right-wing Jewish support. Given the Christian rights newfound influence, it behooves us to ask which parts of this agenda Trump is likely to adopt and to address the time-honored question: Is it good for the Jews?

Under Bannons guidance, Trump has promised to appoint Supreme Court justices who will satisfy the religious right, a pledge generally understood to mean that his appointees will be anti-abortion. But overturning Roe v. Wade is just the tip of the iceberg. The larger agenda is to return the state to its role as the upholder of traditional Christian standards of morality.

The larger agenda is to return the state to its role as the upholder of traditional Christian standards of morality.

This agenda can be divided into two general planks. First and foremost, the Christian right is motivated by the desire to stop the erosion of the governments traditional role as enforcer of Christian standards of morality especially, sexual morality. The ideal Christian nation envisaged by its proponents would enforce prohibitions not only on abortion, but also on contraception, same-sex marriage and homosexual activity, and any sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage.

In the face of political defeats on many of these fronts, conservative Christians have retreated to a Plan B, which is to use religious liberty claims to carve out exemptions from laws that dismantle traditional gender and sexual norms. What was originally a shield to protect non-Protestant minorities from laws that inadvertently interfered with their religious practices has been converted into a sword used by conservative Christians to continue their battle against laws enforcing principles of gender and sexual equality. Laws permitting adoption and family service organizations to discriminate against same-sex couples, exempting government contractors from prohibitions on discrimination, and allowing bakers and photographers to refuse to serve participants in same-sex weddings are just a few examples of this weaponized version of religious liberty.

Some suggest this commitment to religious liberty will be good for the Jews and for other religious minorities. This me, too version of religious equality, according to which government-led prayers and displays of Christian symbols are fine so long as we can erect a menorah on the town square and have a rabbi take a turn at the podium, is seriously misguided. It mistakes a willingness to accord protections to Christians when they find themselves in the position of a minority with a willingness to protect other minority religious groups when their religious practices conflict with Christian values (as conservatives construe them). There is precious little evidence to support such a prediction and ample reason for concern that Christian conservatives who now occupy positions of power are ready to sacrifice the principle of religious liberty when they view another groups religious values as antithetical to their own, as the willingness to override all Muslims rights for the sake of national security makes clear.

The readiness to deny non-Christians rights accorded to Christians should not be surprising. The Christian right has made its view that the government can promote Christianity not just some blanched version of American religion, but Christianity perfectly plain. So long as non-Christian religions are perceived to be compatible with the nations Christianity, they may receive protection, but when there is a conflict between Christian and non-Christian values, the conservative vision of a Christian nation dictates sacrificing the latter for the former.

To what extent Trump will implement this vision under the guidance of Steve Bannon, Vice President Mike Pence and other proponents of a resurgent Christian nation remains to be seen. But Jews and other religious minorities support this movement at their peril. We are better off joining forces with Muslims, the many liberal Christians and Americans of other persuasions who see clearly what the peril of a Christian nation is.

Nomi Stolzenberg is the Nathan and Lilly Shapell Chair in Law at the USC Gould School of Law, where she founded the Program on Religious Accommodation and is a co-director of USCs Center for Law, History and Culture.

Go here to see the original:
Behind Trump’s moves: A Christian resurgence – Jewish Journal – Jewish Journal

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

‘Textbook teaches Christian, not Jewish connection to Jerusalem’ – Arutz Sheva

The Hotam organization criticizes the Education Ministry for introducing textbook presenting Jerusalem as equally holy to three religions. Yedidia Ben Or, 20/02/17 17:29 Rabbi Amital Bareli, the head of the Hotam organization, sent a letter to Education Minister Naftali Bennett criticizing a sixth grade textbook which presented Jerusalem as equally holy to the three religions and even referred pupils to the New Testament. The Hotam organization is dedicated to restoring Judaism’s values to the public arena and maintaining Israel’s spiritual development in consonance with its economic, social and scientific development. Bareli stated that the educational unit designed to teach Jerusalem’s heritage as the historic capital of Israel was worthy and would add a Jewish significance to pupils’ attachment to the city, but the book “In the Paths of Jerusalem” written by Ben Zvi Institute did not aid the adoption of these values. “In the chapter dealing with Jerusalem written by Tamar Hayardeniit is impossible to find even an allusion to the connection between the Jewish people and the narrative regarding the holiness of Jerusalem,” said Bareli. “Hayardeni presents the approaches of the different religions as an observer in order that they can choose which of them they wish to identify with the city. Hayardeni sends pupils to the New Testament to find information about Christian ‘Saints’ and to see the description of Jesus’s birth. She also refers to the “connection between David and Jesus: Jews believe that the Messiah will be a descendant of David and so do the Christians.” Bareli claimed that this both weakens the basis of the Jewish nation to maintain sovereignty over Jerusalem and also weakens the connection of school children to Jewish tradition. He added “We may yet be sorry to find a generation to whom Jerusalem means nothing from a national and traditional point of view and this absurdly when the Education Ministry has taken upon itself the task of transmitting the values of Jerusalem to Israeli pupils. I call on you, Minister Bennett, to investigate the matter properly and ascertain if there is a place for such a book in the educational unit on Jerusalem.”

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

United Nations Identified as Christian vs. Muslim Battleground for Final War of Messiah – Breaking Israel News

For they have consulted together with one consent: against thee do they make a covenant. Psalms 83:6 (The Israel Bible) (Breaking Israel News) In a startling lecture, a noted rabbi labelled the anti-Israel movement prevalent in global politics today as the first stage in a two-part End of Days prophecy, noting that this stage, a Christian-Muslim alliance, is ending as Americas new president severs ties with the Islamic world. Another rabbi agrees, suggesting the absurdity that has come out of the anti-Israel UN is only an indication that the next stage, a Muslim-Christian conflict, will be even stranger. Rabbi Zamir Cohen, a noted scholar and head of the Beitar Illit Yeshiva, stated that in the End of Days, Christianity and Islam will separate into two distinct groups working in unison against the Jewish People as part of a pre-Messianic two-stage political process They will come together against Israel, said Rabbi Zamir Cohen, a noted scholar and head of the Beitar Illit Yeshiva, in a recent lecture. He went on to describe a second stage of the process in which the alliance was broken and the Christians began helping the Jews. When they come against us, there will break out a conflict between them, and then they will strike at each other. Rabbi Shimon Apisdorf, a prominent Jewish educator and bestselling author, agreed, saying that the first stage has already happened: Islam and Christianity have aligned against Israel and the union has manifested in a notoriously anti-Israel international body. The epicenter of this united effort against Israel is most apparent in the United Nations, stated Rabbi Apisdorf to Breaking Israel News. This alliance defies logic, the rabbi said, citing a recent speech by Nikki Haley, the newly appointed US ambassador to the UN. A newcomer to the UN, Haley was astounded at what she saw at her first Security Council meeting. The prejudiced approach to Israeli-Palestinian issuesbears no relationship to the reality of the world around us, Haley said in a press conference last week. The double standards are breathtaking. Rabbi Apisdorf agreed with Haleys assessment, saying that the UN joint effort against Israel was unrealistic and absurd, but it had been prophesied to be so. He quoted the Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki, a French rabbi from the eleventh century known by the acronym Rashi. In his commentary on the first verse in Genesis, Rashi predicted that in the end of days, the non-Jews would all come together, uniting in order to dispute the Jews right to the land of Israel. The UN did exactly this, claiming there is is no connection between Judaism and Jerusalem, a claim that would have been thought absurd just a few years ago. Rabbi Cohen believes the first stage, the unity of Arabs and Christians, is nearing its end, and that the second stage has already begun. In his lecture, Rabbi Cohen said the second stage would begin when a leader arose to unify the Christians against Islam. According to our prophecies, some revolutionary Christian leader will arise who will be disgusted by everything that is happening, said Rabbi Cohen. He will unite the Christian world around him, that is to say Islam will turn into one group, and Christianity into one group. In a previous lecture given just after the US elections, Rabbi Cohen speculated that Donald Trump might indeed be this prophesied leader. He noted that President Trumps unrestrained style of speech is precisely what will join Christians together against the alliance with Islam promoted by the previous president. This is unprecedented, something we have yet to see in the world, a leader who stands up and says that he has had enough of the trespasses of Islam, Rabbi Cohen said. A conflict focusing the combined forces of Christianity and Islam against Israel is a terrifying prospect, but according to Rabbi Cohen, this conflict, the war of Gog and Magog, serves a definite purpose. If we look at it from the side of a divine accounting, what purpose does the conflict serve? the Rabbi asks. When it comes time for the Moshiach (Messiah) to come, let it come, without this conflict. Rabbi Cohen answered his own question by stating that the main purpose of the war of Gog and Magog is to pay back the Gentiles for all the troubles they caused the Jews throughout history. The Christians and Muslims will split, becoming two groups that strike each other, explained Rabbi Cohen, but the conflict can take two forms: one that will be difficult and painful for the Jews and another form in which the Jews escape unharmed. If the Jews correct our mistakes, our blemishes, then the war of Gog and Magog will come only to pay back the other nations for the evil they did to the Jews in the past. If, on the other hand, the Jews have not fixed themselves, then God will use the war of Gog and Magog to pressure us to return us to the correct path.

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

What A 19th-Century Christian Educator Taught Me About Jewish Home Schooling In Age Of Betsy DeVos – Forward

The contentious confirmation of Betsy DeVos as education secretary provoked a fair number of outraged folks to threaten to exercise their own right to school choice and home-school their children. Timing-wise, this announcement coincided with Orthodox Jewish parents starting to get their tuition bills for the next school year. One friend in New York City, a working mother with two toddlers, will be shelling out almost $42,000 next year just in tuition for less than full days in school (plus nanny costs). That is just ridiculous, she complained to me. I could just fire my nanny and hire an entry level teacher for that. Generations ago the English did exactly that, and called the woman a governess. And it is the woman who spearheaded the governess educational philosophy who I intend to follow when I create my own future home school (as, currently, my children are a touch young for a curriculum). There are a dozen or more popular home school philosophies and methodologies, including classical education, Montessori and unschooling (where students direct the lesson plans), and countless more companies with products marketed toward home-schoolers, selling everything from educational toys to math programs. The program we will follow, conceived by Charlotte Mason (1842-1923), eschews most of the trendier (and pricier) options in the American home school market. In 1984, a book by Susan Schaeffer Macaulay titled For The Childrens Sake introduced Mason to mainstream audiences, popularizing her theories for a new generation of parents. Masons method is best known for its two main attributes: a dedication to appreciating the very best that the arts (literature, art, music) has to offer and a reverence for nature, for it is the truest expression of Gods hand in our lives, which we can see with every snowfall, every sunrise and sunset, and more. We attempt to define a person, Mason wrote, as quoted on the Charlotte Mason Institute website, the most common-place person we know, but he will not submit to bounds; some unexpected beauty of nature breaks out; we find he is not what we thought, and begin to suspect that every person exceeds our power of measurement. Sitting in a conference room in Maryland recently, listening to Carroll Smith, director of the Mason Institute, lecture on the finer points of how to deliver a Charlotte Mason education, I realized these were the same things that drew me to Judaism as a young child namely, an appreciation for reading and for God in our everyday lives. One of the keys to a Mason education is the reading of living books, books written by one author who takes a special interest in his or her subject. For example, if youre studying the Civil War, read a literary narrative either by someone from that time period or from a contemporary expert on the subject instead of just a broad textbook. Depending on age, a student might read a firsthand account of fighting for the Union or the South, or James Swansons best-seller, Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase For Lincolns Killer, which recounts the search for John Wilkes Booth. Mason explained that it is living books above all others that engage readers, spark the imagination and remain in our memory long after theyve finished the last chapter. After each reading, the student narrates what has just been read, or retells the story. How did God impart His laws and lessons to the Jews? Through a narrative story: the Torah. And how do we still learn it? By narrating the story over and over and over in classrooms, in living rooms, in synagogues, at Seder tables. This is what God demanded of us in Deuteronomy 6:6 and 7: These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. In an article on parenting for MyJewishLearning, Rabbi Nachum Amsel said, Possibly the most important educational principle for a Jewish parent to adhere to is the notion of bringing up each child according to his or her unique personality, character traits and talents (Proverbs 22:6). 1Mason concurs. A cornerstone of her educational philosophy is this: Children are born persons. What does this mean? Children are not empty vessels. Our methodology should therefore match our beliefs, and a school environment filled with textbooks and worksheets is not how we can impart a tailored education to a unique child. As with many home school communities, the Charlotte Mason world is Christian dominated. Every book written on her philosophy is from a Christian point of view. And at a recent conference in suburban Maryland that attracted about 150 audience members, Im pretty certain I was the only Jew. In fact, Mason experts frequently discuss the dearth of Jewish families who follow Masons teachings. While God is a central part of Masons work, those who follow her teachings also have a lot of Jesus Christ thrown into the mix. Still, given the high levels of unhappiness with education choices facing many Jewish families, its remarkable that home-schooling hasnt caught on more among Jews. Considering the shared philosophical views between Mason and our religion, if more Jewish families were aware of the option, and of her beliefs, this might no longer be the case. __Bethany Mandel is a regular columnist for the Forward. Follow her on Twitter, @bethanyshondark_ The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Jewish Theology A Primer (Especially for Christians) Part I – Patheos (blog)

Perhaps a better title for this next series of posts would be Jewish theologies because its hard to argue that theres really one Jewish theology. How many Jewish theologies are there? Well, to adapt the old joke, if you have three Jewish theologians, you have at least six (or more) Jewish theologies. Over the next several posts, Id like to offer insights on Jewish theology especially for Christians. Why? For two primary reasons: 1) I have many, many Christian friends who I dialog with theologically and philosophically; 2) I believe that most Christians would benefit from engaging, and even applying, some of the ideas, approaches, methodologies, and themes of Jewish theology into their own Christian contexts and self understanding. I believe that Jewish approaches to theology have much to offer Christians. Besides, the conversation is hopefully interesting to Jews, too. In this first post, Id like to explore the oddness of Jewish theology and how authority in Jewish theology operates and doesnt operate. The Oddness of Jewish Theology I wont pretend to be able to do Jewish theology justice in just a few blog posts. A few thousand years of wisdom isnt easy to summarize or treat lightly. Besides, Jewish theology covers all of life how to treat animals, when to harvest trees, how to love your neighbor, what not to eat, how to wage war, how to value peace, the relationship between spouses, the nature of God, the meaning of redemption, and so on. Doing theology doesnt garner the same attention and interest in most Jewish circles as it does in Christianity. One reason for this is that Jews dont have a religious culture that revolves around theological discussion (Discussion? Yes, Formal theological discussion? No.) Another reason is that Judaism understands itself as a peoplehood connected through history, practice, and values, whereas Christianity, while certainly community oriented, is rooted more in ideas about the world, God, and Jesus, rather than an ethnic-cultural identity. Youre a Christian based on what you believe. Youre a Jew according to other criteria. Jewish scholar Louis Jacobs offers this: Jewish theologydefined as the systematic consideration of what adherents of the Jewish religion believe or are expected to believeis notoriously elusive, so much so that voices have been raised to question whether there really is any such thing. Certainly there is no department of Jewish theology, as there is of Christian, at any university. Even in the foremost higher institutions of specifically Jewish learning, such as the Hebrew Union College, the Jewish Theological Seminary and Yeshiva University in the USA, Jews College and Leo Baeck College in the UK, where Jewish theology can hardly be ignored, the subject is often treated with amused tolerance as peripheral to the major interests of both teachers and students. The Queen of the Sciences may have been dethroned in Christendom, but, judging by their neglect, many Jewish teachers deny that she ever enjoyed regal status in the first place. Louis Jacobs Additionally, Jewish theology is diverse not all Jews would agree with my interpretations or the views of other Jewish thinkers for that matter. Further, no Jew can definitively speak for another Jew in terms of theology. Each Jewish branch, each community approaches matters with nuance, difference, and a particular style. My vantagepoint is Reform Judaism and therefore, my theology will be appropriately colored by the Reform tradition although my insights apply beyond the Reform context. Authority in Jewish Theology There is no central Jewish authority no rabbi, text, book, or committee that conveys a binding Jewish orthodoxy. Judaism, likewise, is not creedal there isnt a list of beliefs one must subscribe to in order to be Jewish or to be acceptable in most Jewish communities. Granted, some Orthodox Jewish communities will insist that there is a set of required Jewish dogma along with a group of orthodox rabbis who may authoritatively pronounce on them. But these groups are small within Judaism, and the bulk of Jewish theology and sources especially the Talmud thousands of pages of rabbinic commentary seem to demonstrate otherwise. The Talmud rarely sees the rabbis agree and the nature of the conversations are open ended. Like Catholicism, Judaism has sacred writings (Torah) and tradition (Talmud, teaching, scholarship, practices, rituals, liturgy). Like Catholicism, Judaism has a long history of rich and beautiful observances. Like Catholicism, many Jews have a sacramental view of their religious rituals and practices. And like Catholicism, halakhah is somewhat ( this is a little bit of a stretch) akin to Canon Law. Yet unlike Catholicism, there is no Jewish magisterium and no Jewish pope. Then how is unity realized? How is Jewish tradition and meaning preserved? I think the best answer is to realize that Judaism is an ongoing, few thousand years old, conversation. To be part of that conversation is a voluntary undertaking and to engage it is to accept the parameters and topics of that conversation, traditionally outlined under the three broad headings of God, Torah, and Israel. Which for Catholics and other Christians might be God/Jesus, Scripture, and Church. Underneath those broad headings, discussions about revelation, the nature of God, morality, liturgy, ritual, blessings, scripture scholarship, observance and a whole host of other issues takes place. Like Anglicanism and Christian Eastern Orthodoxy, consensus plays a large role in establishing theological parameters and context. While no single authoritative religious institution makes decisions for all forms of Judaism, a consensus develops among communities, rabbis, scholars, and, over time, enough people join the common cause so that a given position becomes commonplace although, not binding. There isnt a theological litmus test. Ones theological opinions and offerings may be rejected by other Jews; they will almost certainly be argued with by other Jews argument and engagement is perhaps the foundational method for Jewish theology. When I explain this to some people, especially Christians, the response is often, well, then the Torah is your authority, right? To which I reply, No. Torah is part of the written record of the ongoing conversation, and serves as a primary parameter for meaningful Jewish dialog. Yet Torah is a set of writings, and a set of writings can never be authoritative Jews dont do Sola Scriptura writings always require interpretation, and Judaism has no infallible or authoritative interpreters every Jew interprets for themselves. (We were way ahead of Luther.) Another common response, isnt your rabbi in charge? Dont the rabbis decide these things? Again, the answer is, No. Rabbis are trained to teach and interpret, and various groups of rabbis will offer commentary and opinion, but again, in most forms of Judaism, these opinion, or responsa are not binding. (Also, Christians are often surprised to learn that strictly speaking, a rabbi isnt necessary for a Jewish wedding, liturgy, blessings, or even conversions.) Rabbis can and should guide the community in theological matters and questions of observance, but theyre not granted or imbued with any special religious authority. Some Orthodox communities do give their rabbis binding authority, but thats particular to their specific community. Sources of Unity How does Jewish theology not descend into chaos then, wonder many not accustomed to a lack of central authority? Part of the answer is the Jewish focus on orthopraxy rather than orthodoxy. Granted, this distinction is somewhat artificial, but it does convey a reality. Jews tend to be more or less united in their practice lighting Shabbat candles and observing the Sabbath. Celebrating the (many) Jewish holidays. Engaging Torah (and Talmud, and Jewish authors and thinkers.) And practicing well established Jewish values such as hospitality, love of neighbor, care for the needy, and seeking to end oppression of all kinds. Another part of the answer is how many synagogues function. The word synagogue comes from Greek and implies one view or a unity of perspective or community. The synagogue is more than the meeting place for worship its, in theory, the center for the Jewish community. Its activities, discussions, socializing, and worship all which help create a common life would help promote unity within the community despite diversity of beliefs. Finally, as mentioned above, Jewish theology has fairly distinct parameters Torah, halakhah, holidays, a distinct history, the notion of God, Israel, traditions, texts, and so on. Various Jewish thinkers and sages have offered various ideas and meanings within these parameters, but theyve stayed within the lines so to speak. Someone who tries to take the conversation too far off topic would likely be pulled back in or eventually ignored. And Jewish theological reasoning relies heavily on Jewish sources sui generis arguments rarely find traction. There are Christian communities that operate in similar style. One thinks of various Baptist groups, Congregationalists, and even, to some degree, the Episcopal Church. But even within these denominations, the parameters of orthodoxy would be somewhat tighter than that found in Judaism. In our next posts, I hope to discuss some of these parameters and offer Jewish insights concerning their role and meaning. As always, I enjoy engaging with you feel free to comment. Id especially enjoy hearing from Christian reads on these topics. And dont feel you need to agree with me to engage. As long as the comment is on topic and respectful, Ill do my best to respond to you.

Fair Usage Law

February 18, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Christian Genocide Survivors Deserve Support and Priority – Morning Consult

When I visited Erbil, Iraq, in December with a congressional delegation determined to find out why Christians had often been excluded from U.S. aid programs, Archbishop Nicodemus Daoud of Mosul told us that Americans generally care more about endangered frogs than about endangered Christian communities. He has a point. Christians have lived in the region for almost 2,000 years. Many still speak the language of Jesus. But although they, and other minority communities, are now seriously endangered, some Americans seem more worried that they might get priority than that they might disappear completely. The Islamic State terror group, also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh and its antecedents imposed a strict religious test and then targeted minority religious communities for elimination. At best, these communities fled, but lost everything in the process. Those who are outraged that we might now prioritize them are forgetting Americas proud tradition of prioritizing genocide survivors, and the dark moments when we ignored them. After horrifically refusing admission to Jewish refugees on theS.S. St. Louis in 1939, the United States later changed course and numericallyprioritized displaced European Jews. They had suffered a uniquely horrible targeting even if there were more German, French and Italian refugees, who were also displaced and suffering. During and after World War I as well, the U.S. government worked with Near Eastern Reliefto aid Armenian and other Christian communitiestargeted for genocide by the Ottoman Empire. The American people solidly supported the effort. Itis notun-American to prioritize those who have been targeted for genocide because of their faith. It has been seen as quintessentially American for a century. And religious persecution has long been a key qualifier for refugee status under our immigration laws. When theLautenberg amendmentwas renewed with bipartisan support in 2015, no one was outraged. It prioritizes for asylum those who are Christian, Jewish and Bahai, as well as other religious minorities from Iran. Notably, the Obama administrations official policy was also to prioritize Christian and other religious minority refugees from Syria. Knox Thames, the Obama administrations State Department special advisor for religious minorities, wrote in October 2015: Due to the unique needs of vulnerable religious minority communities, the State Department has prioritized the resettlement of Syrian Christian refugees and other religious minorities fleeing the conflict. The policy failed to deliver. Only abouthalf of one percentof Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S.in fiscal year2016 were Christian though they make up 10 percent of the Syrian population.Yazidis and Shia Muslims were also profoundly underrepresented.Again, there was no uproar over the stated policy, and little coverage of its failure. So the outrage is new, but policies claiming to prioritize Christians and other minorities are not. What is deeply troubling is how often U.S. government aid overlooked the needs of these minority groups since 2014. Last year, our government for only the second time in history formally declared an ongoing situation was a genocide. Secretary of State John Kerry explained that this genocide was one of religious persecution, saying: The fact is that Daesh kills Christians because they are Christians; Yezidis because they are Yezidis; Shia because they are Shia.Those words should have triggered Americas duty to help these targeted groups. Instead, Christians and other small communities targeted by ISIS genocidal campaign have often been last in line, not first,to get U.S. government assistance. While the U.S. government and the United Nations have spent heavily on humanitarian relief in the wake of ISIS, the largest community of displaced Christians in Erbil has received no money from our government or from the UN, according to Archbishop Bashar Warda, who is caring for tens of thousands of those displaced there. It is the same story for many Yazidis. In Iraq last spring, I met Yazidi families living next to an open sewer in Ozal City. Except for two kilograms of lamb in 2014, they had receivednothingfrom the U.S. government, andnothingfrom the UN. Only Iraqi Christians themselves overlooked by these entities had helped them. Far from receiving priority, communities most at risk of disappearing have received nothing at all from our government. The reason U.S. and UN officials gave in Iraq this past May for overlooking these groups was that their aid prioritized only individual needs. If someone was hungry, they got aid, but the fact that a group could disappear entirely was never even considered. Helping everyone typically means aid is sent to major refugee camps, resulting in thede factoexclusion of minority communities, since they have been targeted by extremists within these camps, and thus avoid them. It effectively means many religious minorities receivenohelp. That American government aid to these groups is long overdue has until now been a subject of bipartisan agreement, not controversy. The fact is that Americas lack of response to religious minorities has allowed ISIS program of eliminating these people from the region to continue. While ISIS may applaud American inaction toward these communities over the past two years, neither the religious minorities in the Middle East, nor the judgment of history will do the same. Giving preference does not mean helpingonlygenocide survivors. But not giving them preference likely means they will soon be beyond help. They could soon be completely eradicated. Will anyone be outraged then? Andrew Walther is the vice president of communications for the Knights of Columbus andhas been involved in humanitarian aid, public awareness and public policy initiatives for those persecuted by ISIS since 2014. Morning Consult welcomes op-ed submissions on policy, politics and business strategy in our coverage areas. Submission guidelines can be foundhere.

Fair Usage Law

February 17, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

FBI: White Supremacist Says He Planned to Kill Jews ‘In the Spirit of Dylann Roof’ – Daily Beast

A Christian extremist was arrested after he allegedly threatened to massacre a South Carolina synagogue just like his idol did at a black church. A white supremacist planned a terror attack in the spirit of Dylann Roof on a South Carolina synagogue, the FBI alleges. Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, of Conway, South Carolina was arrested Wednesday for allegedly attempting to buy a gun from an undercover agent posing as a hitman for the Aryan Nations. McDowell is a convicted felon and legally prohibited from buying firearms. McDowell allegedly sought the weapon after spending the past month writing Facebook posts about murdering Jews and praising Roof, who was convicted of murdering nine black churchogers in Charleston in June 2016. According to an FBI affidavit filed Thursday, McDowells internet activity suggested that he set his sights on the Temple Emanu-El, a conservative synagogue in Myrtle Beach. I love love to act what u think, [sic] he wrote in a December Facebook post linking to the churchs website. Contacted by The Daily Beast on Thursday, the temple declined to comment, citing an ongoing investigation. McDowell had already been convicted on multiple felony charges of animal abuse, violent burglary, larceny, drugs, and assault. During his time in prison for those offenses, police said he developed connections to white supremacists. According to the FBI, McDowell elaborated on his preferred form of action on Facebook. Dylann roof did what these tattoos wearing so badass is supposed to be doing they don’t give f*** about their white race, he wrote on January 5. All they wanne do is stay loaded on drugs the Jews put here to destory white man and they feast on the drugs. they should be Feasting on the enemy that stole their Heritage and their bloodline and trying to run us off of this Earth you can post pictures off****** Viking and swords all the s*** you want to post if you ain’t got the heart to fight for Yahweh like dylann roof did you need to shut the f******up damn right I’m pissed off when I see a f******white young and disable beat him to death before f******n****** and white people running:their f******mouth not doing nothing!!!!!! !damn right I’m pissed off’. The following day, McDowell allegedly sent a Facebook message to an undercover FBI agent posing as a member of the Aryan Nations. McDowell asked for iron, slang for a gun. When McDowell met the undercover agent at a Myrtle Beach hotel several days later, he supposedly told the agent that screaming white power would not be enough to accomplish his goals. “I got the heart to do that shit, but I don’t have the good training,” the agent quoted McDowell saying. McDowell said Roof inspired him to take up arms. “I seen what Dylann Roof did and in my heart I reckon I got a little bit of hatred and I I want to do that shit. Like, I got desire … not for nobody else it just… I want something where I can say, ‘I fucking did that’ … me personally … If l could do something on a fucking big scale and write on the fucking building or whatever, ‘In the spirit of Dylann Roof.”‘ But unlike Roof, who was arrested and later sentenced to death, McDowell told the agent he planned to get off with murder scot-free. But he continued to post his murderous intent to Facebook even after the meeting. Thank You! You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason Clean up world jewelry [sic] in the name of Yahweh, he wrote on January 25, in apparent reference to Jewry. Heidi Beirich, director of the Southern Poverty Law Centers Intelligence Project said the language was a call-out to sect of white supremacist Christianity. Where he talks about cleaning up world jewry in the name of Yahweh, thats a term for God thats used by members of a particular Christian sect: a white supremacist version called Christian Identity, Beirich told The Daily Beast. The language in here shows he was deeper into white supremacist thinking. Its not some surface-level thing. If he knew about Yahweh and he knew about Christian Identity, hed been spending some time studying white supremacy. Anti-Semitic hate crimes have surged since Donald Trumps election. In New York City, Jews were the victim of twice as many hate crimes in the first two months of 2017 than during that same period in 2016, the according to the NYPD. Jewish centers nationwide have reported a spike in graffiti and threatening phone calls, with approximately 60 bomb threats called into Jewish community centers in January, CNN reports. In his January 25 post, McDowell called on white supremacists to be more like Roof. I wish the day we all get off Facebook and white Warriors like we was born to be like Dylan roof but we gotta do it in a smart away and it takes a team it takes no drugs and party and more planning for the real Victory and not just saying it but should want Bloodshed 2 crave it and be a fanatic for your white race and for Yahweh God they’ve been murder and.killed our birth rites of our white race, he wrote. The following day, McDowell allegedly called the undercover agent to explain his plans. “I just be plotting it out, like, I mean you just run up there on them if they back there partying, and all, with a fucking AK and rip them sumbitches down, and throw, a damn, something at them, McDowell allegedly told the agent. He asked the agent to buy him a gun and ammunition. The alleged murder plot went on hold for weeks, after McDowell allegedly told agents that his mother would not allow him to continue using her cell phone for calls. There was also the matter of paying for the gun and ammunition; McDowell allegedly told agents he needed to ask his grandfather for money. None of McDowells family members returned The Daily Beasts requests for comment. But on February 11, McDowell allegedly called the agent to say the plot was back on. They agreed to meet at a Myrtle Beach Hampton Inn to finish the deal. McDowell arrived at the hotel on February 15 with $109 in hand to allegedly buy the gun. Instead, he found himself swarmed by federal agents. He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on Tuesday, a state official told The Daily Beast. I think this was a guy who was pretty well ensconced in white supremacist thinking, down to the point where he knew the slogans, the buzzwords, and so on, the SPLCs Beirich said. Im not surprised to see him praising Dylann Roof. Hes not the only white supremacist who sees Dylann Roof as a hero, a martyr to the cause.

Fair Usage Law

February 17, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

A Muslim scholar sets out to investigate Jesus Christ – America Magazine

Mustafa Aykol, a practicing Muslim who writes a column for The International New York Times, begins his book by relating how one day in Istanbul he received a copy of the New Testament from a Christian missionary. Before going to sleep he opened it to the Gospel of Matthew and quickly became fascinated. Within a couple of weeks he had finished the entire New Testament. While there were parts of it he as a Muslim could not accept, much was not contradictory to his own faith, and parts were strikingly similar to the Quran. Like a good investigative journalist, he began a study of the Jewish, Christian and Muslim sources that come together in the story of Jesus of Nazareth. This book is the result. The book traces the complex relations between the Gospels, Judaism and Islam. From the beginning the author contrasts Pauline Christianity, with its emphasis on the divinity of Jesus, with early Jewish Christianity, especially as it comes to expression in the Q sayings source, the Epistle of James and later Jewish-Christian sects like the Ebionites. How to explain the startling connections between the theology of the Jewish followers of Jesus who saw him as the promised messiah but not divine and the Arab followers of Muhammad? Jesus is honored in the Quran as born of the Virgin Mary, the Messiah of the Jews and a reformer but not divine; he appears in 93 verses in 15 different Quranic chapters. Akyol shows parallels between a number of Quranic stories of Jesus and Mary with some of the apocryphal gospels, the Protoevangelium of James, the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, the Arabic Infancy Gospel and the Infancy Gospel of Thomasfor example, the story of Jesus making birds out of clay and then giving them lifeimaginative stories rejected by mainstream Christianity. As a Muslim, Akyol believes in the Quran as divinely revealed, though he suggests that the similarities show that the Quran was in dialogue with various traditions present at its time of origin, both the apocryphal gospels and various Jewish-Christian sects, some of which believed in the virgin birth. He sees another parallel in the expression Two Ways, appearing in both the Didache, a late-first-century Christian text, and the Quran, which offers salvation to those who are devoted to God and benevolent toward other humansin other words, salvation through faith and good works, not faith alone, as in the Protestant understanding of Pauline Christianity. This is the teaching of Jewish Christianity, reflected in the Epistle of James. But his contrast of early Jewish and Pauline Christianity is much too facile. He falls into an approach first popularized by liberal Protestant theology of speaking of the Platonization (or Hellenization) of Christianity, making recognition of the divinity of Jesus a late development, an approach long since abandoned by mainstream scholars. The churchs high Christology is rooted in the Jesus of history, in his use, at the time unprecedented, of the familial term Abba in his prayer, the fact that he referred to himself as Son and in his claim to authority to interpret the Mosaic law and proclaim the forgiveness of sins, both of which scandalized his contemporaries. Theologians as critical as Walter Kasper and Edward Schillebeeckx find evidence that Jesus understood his death as tied in with his mission, promising his disciples a renewed fellowship beyond it. Akyol does not seem to appreciate how the churchs Christological language developed slowly within the New Testament period as the early Christians reread their experience of Jesus against their Jewish tradition. For example, while Marks Christology is still inchoate and his use of Son of God did not mean what it would mean two decades later, there are clues that he is struggling to express a mystery that goes beyond the language available to him. His account of Jesus walking on the water is clearly a theophany, using the expression, He meant to pass by them (Mk 6:48), jarring in context, to echo a verse in the Book of Job where Yahweh walks on the the crests of the sea and might pass by (Job 9:8, 11). From the beginning, both Jewish and gentile Christians used the divine title Lord (Mari or Maran in Aramaic, Kurios in Greek) for Jesus. The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (third to second centuries B.C.E.), used Kurios to translate the Hebrew Adonai, which took the place of the holy name Yahweh. Jewish Christians used Mar to avoid pronouncing the divine name. Even the Epistle of James refers to Jesus consistently as Lord or the Lord Jesus Christ. Larry Hurtado points out that Paul can use the Aramaic invocation Maranatha, Our Lord, come (1 Cor 16:22), to his largely Gentile church at Corinth without translating it, as it was certainly familiar to them. He notes that Jesus, from very early in the Christian movement, was the object of the prayer and worship ordinarily reserved for God and that there is evidence of pre-existence theology even prior to Paul. Akyol pays little attention to the Gospel of John beyond commenting on its high Christology. But John is a very Jewish Gospel; its Prologue, which most probably predates the Gospel, speaks of Jesus as the divine Word, active in creation, a recasting of the Wisdom theology that developed in the late Old Testament. In spite of the authors efforts to explain the churchs Christology in terms of an aberrant tradition, there is much to recommend in this study. Akyol writes with a clarity that is admirable, and the book is well researched. (The footnotes take up 55 pages.) He finds common themes within the Scriptures of the Abrahamic religions, the People of the Book, a term originating in the Quran. Both Muslims and Christians can learn from it. Muslims might see in the example of Jesus inspiration to focus on the spirit of their tradition rather than legalistic or fundamentalist interpretations, or his teaching that the lawwhether Torah or Shariahis for man rather than man (and woman) for the law, or his words in Lk 17:21, The kingdom of God is within you, for Akyol evidence that Jesus transformed the kingdom of Godwhich Muslims would call the caliphatefrom a political kingdom into a spiritual one. Christians will be introduced to a more irenic vision of Islam, one that has come to terms with modernity. The fact that the sacred texts of Judaism, Christianity and Islam have far more in common than is generally known should lead to greater mutual respect and to the reconciliation so needed today.

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Baptist leaders tour Israel – Jerusalem Post Israel News

The Baptist leaders at the IFCJ-supported Beit Gilboa orphanage.. (photo credit:IFCJ) The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews sponsored a trip to the Holy Land for 14 Baptist leaders, to get a firsthand view of the work the Jewish state and The Fellowship are doing. The hope is that after their return home, these leaders will take that message to their congregants in order to strengthen Christian support for Israel. We are honored to welcome these outstanding Baptist leaders in Israel, said Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder and president of The Fellowship. This important mission will not only strengthen the powerful connection between Christians and Jews, but will remind Israel and the Jewish people of the unconditional love and support we receive from our Christian friends. In recent years, The Fellowship has been reaching out to the African-American Christian community, building bridges and solidifying ties based on historic relationships forged in the Civil Rights era. Primarily, they have been working together to advocate for the Jewish state against the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, and they have jointly protested instances of antisemitic activity. In 2015, The Fellowship first hosted 21 ministers from the Detroit-based Pentecostal Church of God In Christ, while in January 2016, 22 top clergy of the Washington, DC-based Progressive National Baptist Convention, the movement of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., came to Israel on a trip sponsored by The Fellowship. Also in May of last year, 26 leaders of the NBCA came to Israel with The Fellowship, and last September the IFCJ brought 22 leaders from the Bahamas-based Global United Fellowship to Israel. Thanks to The Fellowship, this trip will help us build bridges with the Jewish people while helping us to serve our congregations and in turn to serve God, said Rev. Samuel Tolbert, a trip leader and president of the National Baptist Convention of America (NBCA), said prior to the trip. They have been here since February 14, and will be returning February 20, touring Jewish and Christian holy sites. Their stops included the Mount of Beatitudes and the Sea of Galilee, the Western Wall and the Old City of Jerusalem, and archeological sites such as Caesarea, Mount Tabor, and Megiddo. The church group also visited Fellowship projects that support Ethiopian-Israeli immigrants and the elderly, and visit Yad Vashem, Israels memorial to the victims of the Holocaust, and the Holocaust History Museum. Steven T. Mack, the senior pastor of the historic Little Rock Baptist Church in Camden, New Jersey, has been documenting some of the groups day trips on Facebook. Upon seeing the locations that he would regularly speak about the pulpit he couldnt contain his excitement. I have often preached from 1 Kings 18:16-45. This is the view from Mount Carmel, where Elijah stood against the prophets of Baal! he wrote. To learn more about Jewish-Christian relations, check us out at @christian_jpost, on Facebook.com/jpostchristianworld/ and see the best of the Holy Land in The Jerusalem Post – Christian Edition monthly magazine. Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin Prev Article The fulfillment of Ezekiel 36

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed

Behind Trump’s moves: A Christian resurgence – Jewish Journal – Jewish Journal

As many American Jews and Jewish organizations join in combatting the recent executive order on immigration and refugees, it is important to realize that the anti-Muslim sentiments of the new administration are one head of a two-headed beast. The other head is a political agenda forged by a coalition of conservative Christians that is closer than ever to achieving its vision of a Christian nation. This linkage between anti-Muslim and pro-Christian policies is revealed in the executive order, which couples a thinly veiled ban on Muslims with a thinly veiled preference for Christians from predominantly Muslim countries seeking refuge in the United States. President Donald J. Trump justified the priority given to Christians over Muslims by stating, If you were a Muslim, you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible. That line is lifted directly from the Christian right, which has long promoted the idea that Christians are a indeed, the most persecuted minority. The belief that Christians are being subjected to religious persecution in America by intolerant secularists has joined the claim that liberals turn a blind eye to the persecution of Christians by Muslims. Both are staples of the worldview that drives Stephen Bannon, the presidents chief strategist and architect of his immigration policies. Bannons unorthodox brand of Christian conservatism is reflected in his admiration for traditionalist Catholics who oppose the current pope, as well as for the newly resurgent Russian Orthodox Church, whose combination of Islamophobia and homophobia has proven to be intoxicating to legions of civilizational conservatives who view the West as locked in a theological battle to the death with Islam. Bannons alliance with conservatives inside the Vatican is likewise based on their shared belief that Western civilization is being besieged from the outside by Muslims and from the inside by the forces of secularism, more particularly, by liberals who support an array of decadent values and refuse to recognize a civilizational war between Christianity and Islam. Bannons characterization of the West in his 2014 speech to the Vatican as the Judeo-Christian West might lead some to believe his Christian worldview will protect Jews even as it constitutes a clear and present danger to Muslims. This belief is wrong on two counts. First, it reflects an unjustifiable disregard for the rights of the Other. Second, being folded into a homogenized Judeo-Christianity now is no guarantee that Jews will not be stigmatized or marginalized later, or that the distinctive harms of anti-Semitism (including Christian anti-Semitism) will not be rendered invisible, as already occurred in Trumps botched Holocaust statement that omitted any reference to Jews. The same concerns hold for the rest of the conservative Christian agenda, which aims to expand protections for religious liberty and to weaken the wall of separation between church and state. Both of these goals have attracted right-wing Jewish support. Given the Christian rights newfound influence, it behooves us to ask which parts of this agenda Trump is likely to adopt and to address the time-honored question: Is it good for the Jews? Under Bannons guidance, Trump has promised to appoint Supreme Court justices who will satisfy the religious right, a pledge generally understood to mean that his appointees will be anti-abortion. But overturning Roe v. Wade is just the tip of the iceberg. The larger agenda is to return the state to its role as the upholder of traditional Christian standards of morality. The larger agenda is to return the state to its role as the upholder of traditional Christian standards of morality. This agenda can be divided into two general planks. First and foremost, the Christian right is motivated by the desire to stop the erosion of the governments traditional role as enforcer of Christian standards of morality especially, sexual morality. The ideal Christian nation envisaged by its proponents would enforce prohibitions not only on abortion, but also on contraception, same-sex marriage and homosexual activity, and any sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage. In the face of political defeats on many of these fronts, conservative Christians have retreated to a Plan B, which is to use religious liberty claims to carve out exemptions from laws that dismantle traditional gender and sexual norms. What was originally a shield to protect non-Protestant minorities from laws that inadvertently interfered with their religious practices has been converted into a sword used by conservative Christians to continue their battle against laws enforcing principles of gender and sexual equality. Laws permitting adoption and family service organizations to discriminate against same-sex couples, exempting government contractors from prohibitions on discrimination, and allowing bakers and photographers to refuse to serve participants in same-sex weddings are just a few examples of this weaponized version of religious liberty. Some suggest this commitment to religious liberty will be good for the Jews and for other religious minorities. This me, too version of religious equality, according to which government-led prayers and displays of Christian symbols are fine so long as we can erect a menorah on the town square and have a rabbi take a turn at the podium, is seriously misguided. It mistakes a willingness to accord protections to Christians when they find themselves in the position of a minority with a willingness to protect other minority religious groups when their religious practices conflict with Christian values (as conservatives construe them). There is precious little evidence to support such a prediction and ample reason for concern that Christian conservatives who now occupy positions of power are ready to sacrifice the principle of religious liberty when they view another groups religious values as antithetical to their own, as the willingness to override all Muslims rights for the sake of national security makes clear. The readiness to deny non-Christians rights accorded to Christians should not be surprising. The Christian right has made its view that the government can promote Christianity not just some blanched version of American religion, but Christianity perfectly plain. So long as non-Christian religions are perceived to be compatible with the nations Christianity, they may receive protection, but when there is a conflict between Christian and non-Christian values, the conservative vision of a Christian nation dictates sacrificing the latter for the former. To what extent Trump will implement this vision under the guidance of Steve Bannon, Vice President Mike Pence and other proponents of a resurgent Christian nation remains to be seen. But Jews and other religious minorities support this movement at their peril. We are better off joining forces with Muslims, the many liberal Christians and Americans of other persuasions who see clearly what the peril of a Christian nation is. Nomi Stolzenberg is the Nathan and Lilly Shapell Chair in Law at the USC Gould School of Law, where she founded the Program on Religious Accommodation and is a co-director of USCs Center for Law, History and Culture.

Fair Usage Law

February 16, 2017   Posted in: Christian  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."