Archive for the ‘Ernst Zundel’ Category

LiveLeak.com – Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail?

Below is a fascinating story of a Canadian who went to jail for…writing a book! He was then deported back to Germany and imprisioned for another 5 years. He is one of thousands of people who is trying to shed light on what really happened in Germany during the war. He makes claims (and sometimes very believable) that the American and Russian concentration camps killed more people than previously imagined. That 6 million Jews never died, and that information regarding the truth is still being suppressed today. Why would Canada jail and deport someone who had been living in the country for 40 years? It is an old article but still a good read, and something to think about.

September 23, 2003 Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail?

http://www.zundelsite.org/archive/zundel_life_in_pics/

By Mark Weber September 2003

For more than six months now, Ernst Zundel has been held without charge in solitary confinement in Canada on the pretext that he is a threat to national security. In fact, this 64-year-old German-born writer, publisher and civil rights activist is a political prisoner and a victim of great injustice.

Who is this man, and why is his case important?

Zundel was arrested at his home in Tennessee on Feb. 5, where he had been living peacefully with his wife, Ingrid Rimland, on the pretext that he missed an interview date with immigration authorities. Two weeks later he was deported to Canada, even though his wife is an American citizen.

Claiming that he is a national security threat, Canadian authorities have been holding Zundel since Feb. 19. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) something like the American FBI supports this charge by citing tenuous and years-old ties by Zundel to white supremacist groups. While acknowledging that he is not violent himself, CSIS also argues that material published by Zundel might cause like-minded individuals to engage in violence.

There is absolutely no basis for the security threat charge. Zundels life is an open book. He is a peaceful man with no record of violence. During the 40 years he lived in Canada, he was never convicted of a crime. In fact, he has himself been a victim of hate and violence. He survived at least three attempts on his life, including a devastating arson attack against his residence.

Jewish groups are demanding that Zundel be deported to Germany, where he faces years of imprisonment for the thought crime of denying the Holocaust. (Holocaust denial is against the law in Germany, France, Switzerland and some other European countries.)

Continued here:

LiveLeak.com – Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail?

Fair Usage Law

February 14, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Why did the Germans turn against the jews. Ernst Zundel – Video



Why did the Germans turn against the jews. Ernst Zundel
Ernst Zundel Interviewed by an Israeli journalist 1996.

By: The Algerian

View original post here:

Why did the Germans turn against the jews. Ernst Zundel – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 6 of 8 – Video



Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 6 of 8

By: Light White

Link:

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 6 of 8 – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel – Interviewed by an Israeli journalist (1996 …

This video is one of the most hard-hitting interviews that Ernst Zundel ever gave to one of his political enemies !! A stunning interview addressing the centuries-old enmity between the Germans and the Jews…

The video is about 120 minutes long, with a introduction by Ernst Zundel explaining and showing just some of the MANY books in his possession (authored by Jews !) that he used in answering many of the questions presented to him in conjunction with this particular interview !!

The quality of the video is quite good (A9 / V8) when one takes into account that the master was made with the old style video cassette cameras that were affordable for that era…

After watching this incredibly well spoken and articulated interview.., then PASS IT ON in whatever way possible… !!!

!!! Truth Does Not Fear Investigation !!!

Also something VERY important to remember is.., “He who Wins the War.., also Writes the History”

Yes / No ??

“The Truth shall make you Free.., but at first.., it’ll make you Damn Mad” !!!

The rest is here:

Ernst Zundel – Interviewed by an Israeli journalist (1996 …

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

R v Zundel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

R v Zundel Hearing: December 10, 1991 Judgment: August 27, 1992 Full case name Ernst Zundel v Her Majesty The Queen Citations [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 Docket No. 21811 Ruling Zundel appeal allowed Court Membership Chief Justice: Antonio Lamer Puisne Justices: Grard La Forest, Claire L’Heureux-Dub, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, William Stevenson, Frank Iacobucci Reasons given Majority McLachlin J., joined by La Forest, L’Heureux-Dub and Sopinka JJ. Dissent Cory and Iacobucci JJ., joined by Gonthier J.

R v Zundel [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court struck down the provision in the Criminal Code of Canada that prohibited publication of false information or news on the basis that it violated the freedom of expression provision under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

In 1985, Holocaust denier Ernst Zndel was charged with “spreading false news” by publishing a pamphlet entitled “Did Six Million Really Die?” in Canada, contrary to s. 181 of the Criminal Code.

Section 181 states that “[e]very one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment”.

At trial, Zundel was convicted. However, on appeal the case was sent back for a new trial due to a procedural error at trial in admitting evidence and instructing the jury. He was re-tried in 1988, and convicted again. The judgement was upheld by the Court of Appeal, and Zundel appealed to the Supreme Court.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether s. 181 of the Code infringed “the guarantee of freedom of expression in s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and, if so, whether s. 181 is justifiable under s. 1 of the Charter.”

Justice Beverley McLachlin, writing for the Court, found that Zundel did violate section 181. The book was examined, and the court concluded that it “misrepresented the work of historians, misquoted witnesses, fabricated evidence, and cited non-existent authorities.” However, section 181 violated section 2(b) of the Charter. Kelsey noted that section 2(b) protects all expression of a non-violent form, and as such, the content itself is irrelevant (section 2(b) is content neutral). The protection provided by the Charter includes expression of minority beliefs even where the majority may find it false (Morais 2001). The imposition of imprisonment for expression has a severely limiting effect on freedom, beyond reason.

McLachlin further found that it could not be justified under section 1 of the Charter as the restriction on all expressions “likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest” was far too broad.

Go here to see the original:

R v Zundel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel: A Spartan of the Spirit – YouTube

Paul Eisen, the founder of Deir Yassin Remembered, wrote this:

Ernst Zundel is, in my view, the greatest dissident of our time.

I’d read about Ernst and I’d written about him, but it was only two years ago that I met him. He was soft-spoken, kind and gentle but every so often you could see the flash of steel. He’d just been released from prison and was engaged in rebuilding his ancestral home. It’s a peasant’s house in the Black Forest, in the heart of Germany – and it had housed his woodcutter father, his large family and the young Ernst.

Never have I seen an edifice so rooted in the land. Like Ernst himself, it seemed to grow out of the soil.

In this documentary, you will meet an entirely different Ernst Zndel — not the “hate-spewing” firebrand a poisonous mainstream media has painted him to be, but the sensitive, creative artist who spent one-tenth of his life incarcerated for his outspoken political convictions on behalf of his demonized people — and still retained his extraordinary spirit of defiance.”

Read more:

Ernst Zundel: A Spartan of the Spirit – YouTube

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel and the Zundel Heresy Trial – Serendipity: 9 …

“Does the freedom of opinion of the West permit the consideration of questions like the crimes of America and Israel or an event like the Holocaust?”

In regard to the publication in Denmark in September 2005 of the Muhammad cartoons, Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said:

Even though it seems that the purpose of the Danish publication was to provoke an angry Muslim response leading to an intended anti-Muslim reaction in Denmark (and the rest of Europe), the Prime Minister’s remark is nevertheless true of his country (atleast insofar as this freedom of expression does not constitute opposition to the U.S./NATO goal of world domination). Incontrast, it is not true of Germany. But that did not prevent the editors of the German newspaper Die Zeit and many other European newspapers from attempting to justify the (entirely unnecessary) republication on February 1st, 2006, of the caricatures on the basis of “freedom of expression”; and the editor of France Soir reprinted the Danish cartoons under a headline which declared: “One Has the Right to Caricature God”.

But we must ask, along with the Iranian journal Hamshari:

The answer is provided by Richard Itani:

Quickly now: what defines a hypocrite? Answer: a person who follows the letter of the law, but not its spirit. The laws against anti-semitism are just that: laws against anti-semitism enacted by hypocritical Europeans with blood on their hands from the genocides in their recent and distant past, and much guilt to atone for in their hearts and minds. Cartoons and Hypocrisy

Ernst Zndel is one of those who have been prosecuted for claiming or attempting to prove that less than six million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis. Europe’s much-vaunted insistence on the right of freedom of expression of opinion apparently does not apply when that opinion concerns whether or not six million Jews really died at the hands of the Nazis. Hypocrisy indeed.

This matter is not a question of anti-semitism (though some will say it is). It is a question of the right to discuss in public the evidence for or against claims that certain things happened, as they are said to have happened (said perhaps by people with a vested interest in portraying historical events in one way rather than another).

On February 9th, 2006, the trial of Ernst Zndel began in Mannheim, Germany.

John Kaminski wrote (when Ernst Zndel was still in jail in Canada, before being deported to Germany, where he was arrested upon arrival):

Continue reading here:

Ernst Zundel and the Zundel Heresy Trial – Serendipity: 9 …

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 1 of 8 – Video



Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 1 of 8

By: Light White

Read the rest here:

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 1 of 8 – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 5 of 8 – Video



Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 5 of 8

By: Light White

More here:

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 5 of 8 – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

LiveLeak.com – Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail?

Below is a fascinating story of a Canadian who went to jail for…writing a book! He was then deported back to Germany and imprisioned for another 5 years. He is one of thousands of people who is trying to shed light on what really happened in Germany during the war. He makes claims (and sometimes very believable) that the American and Russian concentration camps killed more people than previously imagined. That 6 million Jews never died, and that information regarding the truth is still being suppressed today. Why would Canada jail and deport someone who had been living in the country for 40 years? It is an old article but still a good read, and something to think about. September 23, 2003 Who Is Ernst Zundel, And Why Is He In Jail? http://www.zundelsite.org/archive/zundel_life_in_pics/ By Mark Weber September 2003 For more than six months now, Ernst Zundel has been held without charge in solitary confinement in Canada on the pretext that he is a threat to national security. In fact, this 64-year-old German-born writer, publisher and civil rights activist is a political prisoner and a victim of great injustice. Who is this man, and why is his case important? Zundel was arrested at his home in Tennessee on Feb. 5, where he had been living peacefully with his wife, Ingrid Rimland, on the pretext that he missed an interview date with immigration authorities. Two weeks later he was deported to Canada, even though his wife is an American citizen. Claiming that he is a national security threat, Canadian authorities have been holding Zundel since Feb. 19. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) something like the American FBI supports this charge by citing tenuous and years-old ties by Zundel to white supremacist groups. While acknowledging that he is not violent himself, CSIS also argues that material published by Zundel might cause like-minded individuals to engage in violence. There is absolutely no basis for the security threat charge. Zundels life is an open book. He is a peaceful man with no record of violence. During the 40 years he lived in Canada, he was never convicted of a crime. In fact, he has himself been a victim of hate and violence. He survived at least three attempts on his life, including a devastating arson attack against his residence. Jewish groups are demanding that Zundel be deported to Germany, where he faces years of imprisonment for the thought crime of denying the Holocaust. (Holocaust denial is against the law in Germany, France, Switzerland and some other European countries.)

Fair Usage Law

February 14, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Why did the Germans turn against the jews. Ernst Zundel – Video




Why did the Germans turn against the jews. Ernst Zundel Ernst Zundel Interviewed by an Israeli journalist 1996. By: The Algerian

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 6 of 8 – Video




Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 6 of 8 By: Light White

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel – Interviewed by an Israeli journalist (1996 …

This video is one of the most hard-hitting interviews that Ernst Zundel ever gave to one of his political enemies !! A stunning interview addressing the centuries-old enmity between the Germans and the Jews… The video is about 120 minutes long, with a introduction by Ernst Zundel explaining and showing just some of the MANY books in his possession (authored by Jews !) that he used in answering many of the questions presented to him in conjunction with this particular interview !! The quality of the video is quite good (A9 / V8) when one takes into account that the master was made with the old style video cassette cameras that were affordable for that era… After watching this incredibly well spoken and articulated interview.., then PASS IT ON in whatever way possible… !!! !!! Truth Does Not Fear Investigation !!! Also something VERY important to remember is.., “He who Wins the War.., also Writes the History” Yes / No ?? “The Truth shall make you Free.., but at first.., it’ll make you Damn Mad” !!!

Fair Usage Law

February 11, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

R v Zundel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

R v Zundel Hearing: December 10, 1991 Judgment: August 27, 1992 Full case name Ernst Zundel v Her Majesty The Queen Citations [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 Docket No. 21811 Ruling Zundel appeal allowed Court Membership Chief Justice: Antonio Lamer Puisne Justices: Grard La Forest, Claire L’Heureux-Dub, John Sopinka, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, William Stevenson, Frank Iacobucci Reasons given Majority McLachlin J., joined by La Forest, L’Heureux-Dub and Sopinka JJ. Dissent Cory and Iacobucci JJ., joined by Gonthier J. R v Zundel [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court struck down the provision in the Criminal Code of Canada that prohibited publication of false information or news on the basis that it violated the freedom of expression provision under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In 1985, Holocaust denier Ernst Zndel was charged with “spreading false news” by publishing a pamphlet entitled “Did Six Million Really Die?” in Canada, contrary to s. 181 of the Criminal Code. Section 181 states that “[e]very one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment”. At trial, Zundel was convicted. However, on appeal the case was sent back for a new trial due to a procedural error at trial in admitting evidence and instructing the jury. He was re-tried in 1988, and convicted again. The judgement was upheld by the Court of Appeal, and Zundel appealed to the Supreme Court. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether s. 181 of the Code infringed “the guarantee of freedom of expression in s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and, if so, whether s. 181 is justifiable under s. 1 of the Charter.” Justice Beverley McLachlin, writing for the Court, found that Zundel did violate section 181. The book was examined, and the court concluded that it “misrepresented the work of historians, misquoted witnesses, fabricated evidence, and cited non-existent authorities.” However, section 181 violated section 2(b) of the Charter. Kelsey noted that section 2(b) protects all expression of a non-violent form, and as such, the content itself is irrelevant (section 2(b) is content neutral). The protection provided by the Charter includes expression of minority beliefs even where the majority may find it false (Morais 2001). The imposition of imprisonment for expression has a severely limiting effect on freedom, beyond reason. McLachlin further found that it could not be justified under section 1 of the Charter as the restriction on all expressions “likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest” was far too broad.

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel: A Spartan of the Spirit – YouTube

Paul Eisen, the founder of Deir Yassin Remembered, wrote this: Ernst Zundel is, in my view, the greatest dissident of our time. I’d read about Ernst and I’d written about him, but it was only two years ago that I met him. He was soft-spoken, kind and gentle but every so often you could see the flash of steel. He’d just been released from prison and was engaged in rebuilding his ancestral home. It’s a peasant’s house in the Black Forest, in the heart of Germany – and it had housed his woodcutter father, his large family and the young Ernst. Never have I seen an edifice so rooted in the land. Like Ernst himself, it seemed to grow out of the soil. In this documentary, you will meet an entirely different Ernst Zndel — not the “hate-spewing” firebrand a poisonous mainstream media has painted him to be, but the sensitive, creative artist who spent one-tenth of his life incarcerated for his outspoken political convictions on behalf of his demonized people — and still retained his extraordinary spirit of defiance.”

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel and the Zundel Heresy Trial – Serendipity: 9 …

“Does the freedom of opinion of the West permit the consideration of questions like the crimes of America and Israel or an event like the Holocaust?” In regard to the publication in Denmark in September 2005 of the Muhammad cartoons, Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said: Even though it seems that the purpose of the Danish publication was to provoke an angry Muslim response leading to an intended anti-Muslim reaction in Denmark (and the rest of Europe), the Prime Minister’s remark is nevertheless true of his country (atleast insofar as this freedom of expression does not constitute opposition to the U.S./NATO goal of world domination). Incontrast, it is not true of Germany. But that did not prevent the editors of the German newspaper Die Zeit and many other European newspapers from attempting to justify the (entirely unnecessary) republication on February 1st, 2006, of the caricatures on the basis of “freedom of expression”; and the editor of France Soir reprinted the Danish cartoons under a headline which declared: “One Has the Right to Caricature God”. But we must ask, along with the Iranian journal Hamshari: The answer is provided by Richard Itani: Quickly now: what defines a hypocrite? Answer: a person who follows the letter of the law, but not its spirit. The laws against anti-semitism are just that: laws against anti-semitism enacted by hypocritical Europeans with blood on their hands from the genocides in their recent and distant past, and much guilt to atone for in their hearts and minds. Cartoons and Hypocrisy Ernst Zndel is one of those who have been prosecuted for claiming or attempting to prove that less than six million Jews were slaughtered by the Nazis. Europe’s much-vaunted insistence on the right of freedom of expression of opinion apparently does not apply when that opinion concerns whether or not six million Jews really died at the hands of the Nazis. Hypocrisy indeed. This matter is not a question of anti-semitism (though some will say it is). It is a question of the right to discuss in public the evidence for or against claims that certain things happened, as they are said to have happened (said perhaps by people with a vested interest in portraying historical events in one way rather than another). On February 9th, 2006, the trial of Ernst Zndel began in Mannheim, Germany. John Kaminski wrote (when Ernst Zndel was still in jail in Canada, before being deported to Germany, where he was arrested upon arrival):

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 1 of 8 – Video




Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 1 of 8 By: Light White

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed

Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 5 of 8 – Video




Ernst Zundel vs Israeli Journalist 5 of 8 By: Light White

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Ernst Zundel  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."