Archive for the ‘Hate Crime Hoax’ Category

Hate crime hoax alert: Capital University student admits to fabricating several incidents – The College Fix

Hate crime hoax alert: Capital University student admits to fabricating several incidents

A Capital University student has confessed to concocting several hate crime incidents at the school as a way to get attention.

Senior Jalen Mitchell confessed to submitting multiple false reports to campus police after campus police asked him at the end of January if he had written a hate-filled note that was taped to his residences door.

It was a way to try to get attention, to say Someone notice me, Im dying on the inside, Mitchell told the Chimes, the student newspaper.

It seems Mitchell has been seeking notice for at least two years at the Columbus, Ohio school. In 2015, he pulled a stunt similar to this recent one, and the school responded as you might expect: a series of events, including an open conversation and an inclusivity march, to raise awareness of the possibility of hate crimes here on campus.

From the Chimes story:

Mitchell said that reporting the first incident helped the feelings he was having, but it didnt solve what was really happening on the inside, because he didnt seek proper help afterwards. He said this is why he continued with the other two reports, where he says the problem spiraled out of control.

More recently, in the fall of 2016, Mitchell reported an assault on Astor Avenue, near the tennis courts. He told university police he was attacked on campus by a man with a knife during his walk home from visiting a friend. According to the safety bulletin, Mitchell received cuts and scratches on his neck, arms, leg and stomach, allegedly by a white male in his late 20s or early 30s with a full beard.

MORE: Prosecutors wont file charges against Muslim student suspected of hate-crime hoax

Mitchell wants those who are angry about the incidents being fabricated to know that hes sorry, and he never thought it would go as far as it did.

I didnt mean to cause alarm, I didnt mean to scare anyone, Mitchell said. I just wanted to be noticed not for fame, just acknowledgement.

After receiving help, he feels much more comfortable speaking about what hes feeling, and he realizes that fabricating the reports was not the way to accomplish anything. He hopes that everyone sees him as someone whos broken, been broken and is crying for help.

Jalen adds that he wishes that those who feel his actions have delegitimatized the reporting of hate crimes will forgive him.

The matter has been referred to (campus) Judicial Affairs.

Read the full article.

MORE: The best of the worst post-election pro-Trump incidents and hoaxes

MORE: Black students expelled for hate-crime hoax after police cite no evidence for story

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

IMAGE: Shutterstock

Read this article:

Hate crime hoax alert: Capital University student admits to fabricating several incidents – The College Fix

Fair Usage Law

February 24, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Documents show physical evidence behind hate crime hoax arrest – Beloit College Round Table

A series of documents obtained by The Round Tablehaverevealed the physical evidence that lead to the recent arrestof Michael Tyler Kee20 for an incident involving Islamophobic graffiti on the Beloit College campus.

In an affidavit submitted by Detective Amber Davies of the Beloit Police Department, it is reported that Officer Aaron Mueller of the Beloit PD responded to the initial vandalism complaint around 2:30 a.m. on the morning of Monday, Jan. 30, where he found the Islamophobic graffiti. Mueller also discovered a used can of red spray paint in a garbage can that was located in close proximity to Kees door.

The affidavit goes on to state that when Officer Rick Valdez, an evidence technician, arrived on the scene, he discovered that Kee had admitted to having bought the can of red spray paint from Walmart at 11:30 p.m. on Sunday, Jan. 29. According to Valdez, Kee reported that [they] threw the spray paint out in the garbage because [they] found that it was for wood and not what [they] intended to use it for.

Then, on Tuesday, Jan. 31, at approximately 4:30 p.m., the Beloit PD report that Kee admitted to purchasing the spray paint at Walmart in the City of Beloit and used the spray paint to write the racial slur on [their] own apartment door.

Kee was arrested and has been tentatively charged with obstruction, disorderly conduct and criminal damage.

When escorting Kee back to their room, officers also discovered red colored, overspray looking, spray paint on the carpet inside Kees apartment.

The search warrant, which was authorized by Rock County Court Commissioner Stephen D. Meyer on Feb. 1, resulted in a piece of the carpet and a slip of paper being confiscated. The contents of the paperare unknown at this time.

Read the rest here:

Documents show physical evidence behind hate crime hoax arrest – Beloit College Round Table

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Hijab-wearing student who concocted hate crime hoax after Trump election won’t face charges – TheBlaze.com

Prosecutors have declined to press charges against a hijab-wearing University of Michigan student who police said made up a hate crime she blamed on a white man just three days after Republican Donald Trump was elected president.

The schools student newspaper, the Michigan Daily, noted a news release from Ann Arbor police indicating that the Washtenaw County prosecutors office declined to authorize criminal charges against the student.

Her claim was that on the evening of Nov. 11 a white male approached her off-campus in Ann Arbor and demanded she remove her hijab a head scarf often worn by Muslim women or hed set her on fire with a lighter. The students description of the white male in question was fairly detailed: 20 to 30 years old, average height, athletic build, bad body odor, unkempt appearance and intoxicated with slurred speech.

Police soon characterized the claim as ethnic intimidation, and outrage on campus that began after Trumps election intensified.

Investigators conducted witness interviews and reviewed multiple surveillance videos of the area in question, the updated report read. During the course of the investigation, numerous inconsistencies in the statements provided by the alleged victim were identified. Following a thorough investigation, detectives have determined the incident in question did not occur.

Steven Hiller, chief assistant prosecutor, told the College Fix the office will not comment further on this case.

After the hoax was uncovered in December, police said the unidentified woman could be charged with filing a false police report, MLive reported.

Sending it to the prosecutors office is standard procedure when the investigation has revealed the incident as reported was false, and the person who reported knows its false, Ann Arbor Police Detective Lt. Matthew Lige told the outlet.

A felony charge also could have been filed against the woman since the crime she reported ethnic intimidation is itself a felony, MLive added.

The rest is here:

Hijab-wearing student who concocted hate crime hoax after Trump election won’t face charges – TheBlaze.com

Fair Usage Law

February 15, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

No Charges for Hijab Hate Hoax, Says Prosecutor – Breitbart News

Aphelandra Messer

by John Binder15 Feb 2017Ann Arbor, MI0

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Washtenaw County Chief Deputy Assistant Prosecutor Steve Hiller told Michigan Live that the woman would not be charged with falsifying a police report.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Back in December 2016, police determined that the Michigan student had faked the hate crime attack after Ann Arbor police investigators and university officials interviewed witnesses and reviewed surveillance footage.

Detectives reviewed hours of surveillance video, Detective Lt. Matthew Lige told Michigan Live at the time. We could not find her on any video. They just werent there.

The Muslim woman originally claimed that she was walking on campus when a white man approached her and threatened to light her hijab on fire if she did not remove it. The woman said the man brandished the lighter that he was going to use. She claimed she removed her hijab and the man fled on foot.

The woman reported the fake hate crime attack following President Donald Trumps victory against Hillary Clinton.

In a similar hate hoax case, a New York City Muslim woman claimed that she was attacked by a group of Trump supporters while in the subway, an incident that the New York City Police Department (NYPD) said did not occur, as Breitbart Texas reported.

John Binder is a contributor for Breitbart Texas. Follow him on Twitter at@JxhnBinder.

Big Government, Breitbart Texas, Social Justice, Hate Crime, hate crime hoax, Hillary Clinton, hoax, Islam, Michigan, Muslim, New York City, President Donald Trump, Student, Trump, University of Michigan

Read more from the original source:

No Charges for Hijab Hate Hoax, Says Prosecutor – Breitbart News

Fair Usage Law

February 15, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Albany Hate Crime Hoax: What Really … – Louder With Crowder

Steven Crowder Thursday May 5 2016

Weve told you about the recent Albany Hate Crime Hoax (see LEAKED: The 911 Call That Exposed the Albany Racist Hate Crime Hoax and SURPRISE: Albany Students LIED about Racism. Heres the Truth). We can now report the following good newsthe girls have all be indicted!

Albany County D.A. David Soares announced Monday that three defendants were indicted by an Albany County Grand Jury on charges related to an alleged incident that occurred on a CDTA bus on January 30th.

Ariel Agudio, Asha Burwell and Alexis Briggs face several charges, including 3rd degree Assault and Falsely Reporting an Incident. The three UAlbany students had said they were attacked on board a CDTA bus because of their race. Audio and video from the bus did not support the allegations. The case went to the grand jury after the three 20-years olds refused a plea deal that would have required an apology.

Oh, and theres also this

Investigators say a review of multiple videos of the incident showed no evidence the women were victims of a crime or subjected to racial slurs. In fact, police said the women were the aggressors, assaulting a 19-year-old white woman.

Police said surveillance and cellphone video, as well as eyewitness testimony, contradicted the womens account. The white men Agudio, Burwell and Briggs claimed assaulted them were actually trying to break up the fight.

I especially want to point out that what happened on the bus was not a hate crime,’ University Police Chief Frank Wiley said in a statement, according to the Albany Times-Union.

Hillary Clinton, your response?

Good lord, doesnt Hillary have access to basic Google? Hell, even Bing would work. In a pinch. If you have to. This is similar to when Hillary and Obama trot out the wage gap statistic. Everybody whos conducted a basic amount of research knows it to be false, yet they parrot it as a talking point regardless.

At a certain point, assuming ignorance is far too generous. Ive got to believethat theyre not idiots, that they know better, and they just dont care anymore.

As far as the hoax itself does it come as any surprise? From Poop Swastika at Mizzou, to Mattress Girl at Columbia. From Shaun Kings fake hate crime incident(no really, he even checked the caucasian box in the police report which you can see here)to the UVA rape scandal, time after time these fabricated tales turn out to be hoaxes. Its come to bethe rule rather than the exception. You know who that hurts? The real victims of actual crimes.

Remember when Lena Dunham falsely claimed that she was raped? Well, how do you think that affects victims of actual rape? Watch below.

Read the rest here:

Albany Hate Crime Hoax: What Really … – Louder With Crowder

Fair Usage Law

February 9, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Beloit Police Speak on Hate Crime Hoax – MyStateline.com

BELOIT – Beloit Police Chief David Zibolski is speaking out after a hate crime, reported on Beloit College’s campus, turned out to be fake.

“There were certain indicators that led us to believe there was a little more to the story,” he said on Thursday.

It all began with a real hate crime: An anti-semitic note passed under a student’s door at a residence hall. Zibolski says that threat was investigated immediately.

“We were already investigating the first incident when this one came up, which obviously ratcheted up the fear and concern on campus,” he said.

Zibolski says another student came forward with a hate crime report, this one involving anti-Muslim messages painted on a residence hall door. But after a thorough investigation, detectives discovered the victim, 20-year-old Michael Kee, had painted the messages himself. Kee admitting to the crime, saying he wanted the same attention the campus was giving the other student.

Zibolski says false reports like Kee’s can increase the trauma for real hate crime victims.

“Especially something of this magnitude, which has that kind of draw and fear that comes with it,” he explained. “That really can cause delegitimizing or diminishment of the public’s response when we have additional crimes of that nature.”

Beloit College Spokesperson Whitney Helm says students have come together to help each other process both the real hate crime and the fake one.

“Making sure that their fellow students feel supported, and definitely those communities and marginalized groups feel most supported,” said Helm.

Zibolski says he wants the public to know his department will continue to investigate hate crimes vigorously, despite the false report.

Kee is charged with obstructing, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage to property. Beloit Police are still investigating the other, legitimate hate crime.

Read more:

Beloit Police Speak on Hate Crime Hoax – MyStateline.com

Fair Usage Law

February 8, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!

BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so far!!

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Link: Hell Storm documentary

Please go to IMDB, create an account and write a negative review of this film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4661358/

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

Sister of Muslim Woman in ‘Trump’ Hate Crime Hoax Blames …

Ark. Bill Seeks to Ban Purchase of Junk Food With Food Stamps

‘Christmas Magic’: Marine Dressed as Santa Surprises Son at School

Woman to Adopt Dying Best Friend’s Children: ‘We Love Each Other & I Love the Kids’

The sister of a woman charged in New York City for filing a false police report about drunk men on a subway train yelling “Trump” and “terrorist” at her blames the NYPD for bringing the alleged lie to light.

Sara Seweidsaid the police never should have investigated her sister’s claims because law enforcement’s “first instinct” is to doubt and then disprove accusations, the New York Post reported:

“Things snowballed out of our control because of the media reporters made things so much worse for our family.

I had more than one cop tell me that theyve looked through all our social media and it doesnt look good that weve been vocal about certain issues they perceive to be anti -trump, anti-white and even anti-men.

Yasmin Seweid of New Hyde Park, N.Y. said that on December 1, a group of inebriated white men began yelling “Trump, Trump!”, “Go back to your country!” and “Terrorist!” at heron a late-night subway train.

Further investigation brought authorities to the conclusion that YasminSeweidfabricated the encounter and they subsequently charged her with filing a false report and obstructing government administration.

Yasmin Seweidadmitted she made up the story because she did not want to be in trouble with her family for staying out late, Abby Huntsman reported.

Prior to her arrest, Seweid also allegedly ran away to her sister’s home in upstate Fishkill, sparking a manhunt, the Post reported.

Maryland Teen Shoots Deer That Invaded His Family’s Living Room

A Professor Says the Term ‘Holiday Party’ May Also Not Be PC Enough

Texas Police Department Waives Tickets, Asks for Toy Donations Instead

Here is the original post:

Sister of Muslim Woman in ‘Trump’ Hate Crime Hoax Blames …

Fair Usage Law

December 19, 2016   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

2011 Campus Hate Crime Hoax Season About To Begin …

Students are heading back to college, but I don`t expect to see any new campus hate crime hoaxes until spring. The simple reason: spring is hoax season. Who wants to march and protest out in the cold?

But last spring saw a bumper crop! And this year, there will no doubt be morebecause of the dynamics of diversity in Obama`s Brave New America.

It`s important to remember that the Hate Crime hysteria has real (white) victims. My May 26 VDARE.COM story, Report from Occupied America: Free the Mizzou Two! , told the increasingly common tale of two young men at University of Missouri Columbia (“Mizzou”), arrested, indicted, and coerced into copping guilty pleas, who hadn`t committed any crimesbeyond being white, male, and heterosexual.

The whole episode was Kafkaesque. Then again, life today for a normal, red-blooded, American college boy increasingly is Kafkaesque.

Meanwhile, Mizzou does have a serious problemviolent black crimes against members of the university community on and near campus. But university chancellor Brady Deaton, who denounced the innocent Mizzou Two, is silent about that.

Between late January and late March of this year, black students on seven different college campuses in Ohio, California, Missouri and Tennessee were the victims of “hate crimes”.

Just kidding!

Except that the people behind these “hate crimes”, all obvious hoaxes, aren`t laughing. They seek to intimidate, disenfranchise, and imprison people who have broken no laws, based solely on the color of the latter`s skinand at the same time extort huge sums of money and take over their respective campuses.

The real campus racism story, the one the MainStream Media refuse to tell, is one of black racial animus.

The past 23 years have seen one black race hoax after another, on and off campus. Though many of these “hate crimes” remain technically unsolved,” I don`t know of any claims by campus “blacks” (or their non-black leftist comrades) that weren`t hoaxes. Thus the rational response to each lurid new claim should be skepticismon a par with what we bring to the daily e-mails promising us millions of dollars.

And yet each new claim is treated by college administrators, police, and the media, as if no black race hoaxes had ever been exposed.

And even after they are exposed as hoaxes, black students and their white enablers act as though they had been real. Simultaneously, they variously ignore, cover up, and lie about, the constant violent, racially-motivated crimes being perpetrated by blacks against whites (and Asians) on and off campus, and vilifying and attempting to destroy those whites who complain. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.)

Get out your scorecards. During the 2010 spring semester, these campus “hate crimes” were allegedly committed:

“We will not tolerate disrespect, racism or bias on our campus. One of my top priorities as chancellor is to increase diversity on our campus, and one of the best ways to do that is to create and maintain a welcoming campus climate for all.”

[UT reports detail bias incidents; chancellor calls for change by Chloe White Kennedy, Knoxville News Sentinel, March 26, 2010.]

(“Hate crimes” that were almost certainly copycat hoaxes targeted Jews and homosexuals at UC Davis, gay activists at the University of Idaho College of Law, and Jews at UC Berkeley. Hoax envy runs rampant.)

What makes for a successful race hoax?

The Hocking College Hoax never caught fire. The MSM doesn`t much care about community colleges. The Johnson & Wales Hoax also failed to get a national stage.

You never know which race fraud will attain media stardom. But UCSD can serve as a case study.

In retrospect, the reasons for the great success of the UCSD hoaxers were:

Friends in high places: Pres. Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have repeatedly reiterated their support for anti-white racism (see also here), and for black race hoaxes;

Media support: The MSM opposed California`s 1996 anti-affirmative action Prop. 209 and have sought to destroy it ever since its enactment, and thus devoted credulous, saturation coverage to the UCSD hoaxes;

Numbers: With over 28,000 studentsonly 26 percent of whom are whiteUCSD is a huge, high-profile campus;

Historic significance: In spite of a limited amount of stealth affirmative action, UCSD had held the line on academic standards better than any other UC campus, as witnessed by blacks comprising only 1.6 percent of its student body. Success at UCSD could presage the end of any standards in the UC system and the de facto gutting of Prop. 209 The UCSD hoaxes and protests appear to have been coordinated with the long-planned, March 4 statewide black and Hispanic student and faculty protests demanding more illegal privilegesmore race and ethnicity-based money, admissions, jobs and programs.

Tenacity: The UCSD hoaxers never quit, committing hoax after hoax, lying about each in turn, and various additional crimes (trespassing, vandalism);

Help on the Ground I: The hoaxers were supported by the faculty and students of entire programs and departments of pseudo-scholarship that exist, in order to maintain race-focused job mills, and promote race consciousness and irredentism: Ethnic Studies, “Chicano/a and Latino/a Arts & Humanities,” and African-American Studies;

Help on the Ground II: Student government President Utsav Gupta [Email him] exploited the situation by illegally shutting down all student media until the student government overrode him and by seeking to institute illegal rules which would have permanently silenced all student media that was not anti-Western, with himself the arbiter. If a report that “Gupta said he is working with UCSD legal counsel” is true, Gupta also feloniously conspired with the UCSD administration to violate white students` civil rights;

Help on the Ground III: Chancellor Fox exploited the situation by illegally “investigating” perfectly lawful behavior by white students, and by entering into negotiations with, and signing an agreement with the BSU, that violated the California Constitution and white students` Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Her administration conspired to cover up the true nature of the incidents by manipulating the UCSD Police Department, and withholding information. Instead of investigating the BSU students for possible race hoaxes and conspiracy to commit extortion, and arresting them for trespassing and vandalism, Fox praised them. She seeks to impose a joint Fox-BSU dictatorship on the school;

Help on the Ground IV: San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith [Email him] refused to release the name, race, or ethnicity of the confessed noose-hanger.

As a veteran Hate Crime watcher, this naturally aroused my suspicions. But on March 31, CA Goldsmith`s communications director, Gina Coburn, e-mailed me:

“In regards to your inquiry on the recent incidents at the University of California San Diego, the case having to do with a noose found in the library remains open and is under active investigation. We cannot comment for that reason.”

Coburn [Email her] repeated her claim, during an April 1 telephone conversation, that the case was still “under investigation,” adding, “we are in the process of reviewing the case.” When I interjected, “reviewing, but not investigating?” she switched to “it`s an investigation and a review of the case.”

I pointed out to her that the UCSD PD had completed the investigation, and handed over its case file and evidence to the City Attorney`s office on March 2. Coburn acknowledged that, but stayed on message.

I retorted, “I`ve never heard of a case where a white suspect was alleged to have committed a hate crime, in which his name was suppressed. Ever.”

Apparently, City Attorney Goldsmith does not believe that the Hate Crime law applies to non-whites. His illegal suppression of the confessed noose-hanger`s name was, I believe, part of a strategy to “disappear” the crime. The legal term for that is “conspiracy to obstruct justice.”

Another political prosecutor. What a surprise!

In mid-February, Chancellor Fox announced that she was investigating, and looking to discipline white fraternity members who, she said, had advertised the “Compton Cookout.” But as the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education`s (FIRE) Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Will Creeley, pointed out in a February 23 letter to Fox, for her even to “investigate,” much less discipline the fraternities, would violate their constitutional rights.

In a February 22 letter to Gupta and Fox, Adam Kissel, the director of FIRE`s Individual Rights Defense Program, argued that Gupta`s actions in shutting down student media were “unconstitutional and morally questionable.”

After FIRE`s Creeley and Kissel, and David Blair-Loy, the legal director of the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, notified Chancellor Fox that she was violating the law, she ignored them (and UCSD spokesman Rex Graham declined to respond to them), but quietly removed her threats.

However, whites on campus still do not know their rights. At this point, it will likely require the UCSD administration losing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit, to change how it does business.

Thus far, no individual or group has announced plans to file such a suit, and Creeley told me that FIRE does not engage in litigation.

On February 22, 23 (PDF), and 24 (PDF), the ACLU`s Blair-Loy wrote variously to Chancellor Fox and student government president Utsav Gupta, pointing out that they were violating students` First Amendment rights.

But those letters were contradicted, and thus neutralized, by a February 25 letter from Andrea Guerrero, the policy & field director of the same ACLU branch, and a longtime, embittered foe of Prop. 209, heartily supporting Fox` illegal, racist, anti-civil liberties campaign, and offering the ACLU`s help, in implementing it!

In March, despite leaving detailed voice and e-mail messages at the ACLU`s national media office in New York, and speaking with someone there named “Pam” about the UCSD and Mizzou cases, I never got a response.

But that was not surprising. In February, I had asked “Pam” for a statement regarding the terrorist threats that had caused four hotels in a row to cancel their bookings for the American Renaissance conference. She never responded the either.

Blair-Loy notwithstanding, the ACLU is not a civil liberties organization. In line with its founding by a Communist, it is a civil rights a.k.a. civil privileges organization. It supports “Racial Justice” and “[Illegal] Immigrants` Rights,” i.e., it seeks to disenfranchise and dispossess America`s white majority.

The knowledge that the “Compton Cookout” was the work of a black comedian, whose stage name is Jigaboo Jones, and that the noose was probably hung by a “minority student,” had no effect on the black students, Chancellor Fox or, for that matter, the media.

But say that white students had indeed committed the acts in questionsave for the noose: They weren`t crimes anyway! Only the noose was illegal, due to an unconstitutional state law that blacks had demanded, and that the race hoax-mongering (here and here) NAACP had sponsored (PDF), following a wave of black noose hoaxesdo I detect a pattern here? And that was only a misdemeanor.

Conversely, virtually all of the black students` 32 demands were illegal. They entail giving unqualified black students and personnel huge sums of money, admissions, and jobs, based solely on the color of their skin, in violation of the California Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment; instituting segregation (a “safe space” for black students), in violation of historic Supreme Court precedents; and violating white students` First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Though the Black Student Union avoided directly antagonizing Asian students, its demands also violated most of the same rights regarding Asians.

The BSU depicted UCSDwhere white-on-black crime is virtually non-existentas a place where blacks are unsafe, and where vague “racial tension” rules, which the administration must somehow cause to disappear.

The UCSD Police Department, which has jurisdiction for all on-campus matters, is supposed to be a professional, independent police agency, but on March 11, I learned otherwise. When I asked to speak with a Department public information officer, I was transferred to Rex Graham, [Email him] at UCSD Communications and Public Affairs. The interview consisted of my asking one question after another, and Graham refusing to answer me.

Graham claimed that he couldn`t so much as tell me the race or ethnicity of the noose-hanger. But according to the booklet, Covering Campus Crime published by the Student Press Law Center (who can`t help their initials), that was untrue. No law prohibited him from giving me that information. More importantly, since the perp has now confessed to committing a crime, UCSD is legally obligated to release her name and other information about her.

If UCSD is hiding the name of a confessed criminaleven if the law in question is obscene and unconstitutional, and the crime only a misdemeanorUCSD is, at the very least, violating the federal Clery Act, and at worst, engaged in a felonious conspiracy to obstruct justice. Chancellor Marye Anne Fox [Email her] should at least be fired, and at worst be arrested and prosecuted.

When I asked Graham whether Chancellor Fox would be meeting with white student group leaders to parallel her announced regular meetings with the BSU, he did not even understand the question.

UCSD Chancellor Fox` talk of “horrific acts of hate” expresses both her pomposity and lack of any moral compass. Truly “horrific acts of hate” would entail carnage such as the crimes against academics that I linked to earlier, or the racially-motivated atrocities that blacks regularly commit against non-academic whites.

Nevertheless, the UCSD race hoaxes were so successful that on March 24 the UC Board of Regents “apologized” for the (non-existent) white hate crimes against black students, and proposed reintroducing affirmative action at UCSD (which it already did last year at UC Berkeley and UCLA), via the euphemism “holistic review” of applications. Someone will have to sue the Regents, in order to stop their illegal actions.

If Chancellor Fox is not stopped from acceding to the black students` illegal demands, she will turn UCSD into a diversitopia.

Footnote: UCSD`s handling of a May 10 incident dispelled any last doubt that Fox had any principles, as opposed to leftwing loyalties.

During the Q&A following a David Horowitz speech, an Arab Muslim coed named Jumanah Imad Albahri made the mistake of trying to intimidate him. He turned the tables on her, and in a Perry Mason moment, got her to admit, on camera, that she supports genocide against all Jews, worldwide.

UCSD`s response was underwhelming. Albahri lied, in insisting that her remark did not represent her true beliefs, and made a non-apology-apology condemning Horowitz. Even though the entire exchange had been captured on camera, the administration gave her a pass.

Radical Muslims are part of the multicultural alliance; thus the UCSD administration sees them as allies, whereas it sees white, heterosexual, Christian menunless they wage war on their ownas enemies.

The role of Jews on the multicultural campus is presently ambiguous.

Jews who embrace genocidal anti-Semitism (parallel to white gentiles like Jane Elliott and Tim Wise, who embrace genocidal anti-white racism) are assured of privilege. Other Jews who are not anti-Semitic, e.g., those at Berkeley, are demanding a seat at the multicultural cannibals` feast. Jews who do not fit into either of the aforementioned groups are in trouble.

Normally law enforcement authorities typically start with a crime, and then investigate said crime, in order to hopefully determine the identities of the perpetrators, and to arrest and prosecute the latter. But that isn`t the way things typically work when police say that they are “investigating a possible bias crime.” In such cases, either:

No crime was committed, but police are seeking to intimidate whites (but never blacks) out of exercising their legal rights;

No crime was committed, but the authorities seek to find, arrest, prosecute, and imprison a white, simply because he exercised his legal rights in a manner that they don`t like; or

As in the UCSD noose case, a statute (which may be unconstitutional) may have been violated, but the authorities will only arrest and railroad someone (e.g., a white, Christian, male heterosexual) not from an unconstitutionally “protected class.”

The modern academic race hoax movement began at Columbia University in March 1987. As I wrote in my January 2007 VDARE.com expos on the Duke Rape Hoax:

“In three separate attacks, a mob of seven young black menstudents and non-studentsbeat up a total of five white Columbia University men students.

“Following a by now dog-eared script, a group called Concerned Black Students at Columbia (CBSC), represented by “activist attorney” C. Vernon Mason, claimed that “a mob of white students had kicked and stomped a single black student and then went on a rampage shouting, `We`re going to kill you fg ns!`”

“Although 22 witnesses had already contradicted the black attackers` claims, the latter were never arrested, and indeed, demanded that their white victims be arrested.

“When CBSC held mini-riots, in which as many as 50 supporters, black and white alike, were arrested, protesting “against racial violence” and against the failure of the NYPD to follow their demand that police arrest the white victims, Columbia responded by promising more affirmative action in admissions and faculty hiring.

“The Columbia race hoax received months-long saturation coverage by the national media; once the hoax was exposed, the media went silent.

“Black students at six other East Coast university campuses, including Duke, were inspired to take over campus buildings. In each case, the black students decried “resurgent [white] racism” on campus and demanded and got concessions from the institution in question in the form of expanded affirmative action for black student applicants and professors.

“There was a campus racism problem, alright, but it was that of resurgent black racism.”

(Mason had just come off staging the Howard Beach Hoax with his accomplices Al Sharpton and Alton Maddox; later that year, the trio would promote the Tawana Brawley Hoax. Mason was later disbarred for misconduct and neglect regarding 20 different clients. Maddox was suspended indefinitely from practicing law for refusing to cooperate with an investigation into his conduct during the Brawley hoax.)

But institutional racism was now entrenched at Columbia:

In 1993, a black security guard managed to get three white man undergraduates who worked for the school escort service fired, based on a fake “racism” charge;

(An escort service for students means a guard service that walks them from place to place late at night, to keep them safe, not what it means for adults like, say Eliot Spitzer. Q: Why is this service necessary for Columbia University? A: because it`s located near Harlem.)

Around the same time, a black Columbia Law student claimed, without a shred of evidence, that a third-year, white man classmate, a devout Catholic, had made an obscene telephone call to her late at night. Columbia`s counsel turned the burden of proof upside down, making the impossible demand that the man prove that he was not guilty. Only when the white man`s lawyer threatened to sue Columbia did the school drop its persecution campaign. [Diversity at Columbia U.: When “Chocolate” and “Vanilla” are Fighting Words (PDF) by Jeffrey M. Duban, Heterodoxy, January 1995.].

Fast forward to October, 2007. When Madonna Constantine, a black affirmative action hire who was a tenured full professor (see here, here (PDF), and here) of multicultural counseling psychology at Columbia`s Teachers College, learned through her department sources that she was about to be fired for having engaged in serial plagiarism and other misconduct, a noose appeared on her office door.

Although the case reeked of a hoax from the get-go, it received credulous, nationwide, saturation publicity (even from “rightwing” Fox News), and of course, inspired campus protests against “racism.”

Though no one cited any laws that had been broken, the NYPD Hate Crimes Task Force and three different DOJ agencies investigated. The MSM promoted the myth that white racists had been planting nooses all over the country. The evildoer was never brought to justice.

When Columbia finally fired Constantine in August, 2008, she asserted that she was the victim of a racist conspiracy, “structural racism,” and an “academic lynching,” and sued Teacher`s College for $200 million. (The suit is pending.)

If anything, there was a conspiracy in support of Constantine.

Meanwhile, as always, black criminals habitually target white and Asian Columbia students and personnel with robberies and burglaries; assault and battery (including gang assaults); rape and attempted murder; and murder (also here).

And yet, none of these black attacks, as opposed to the black race hoaxes, has ever issued in rallies, “bias crime” charges, public denunciations by law enforcement or colleges, or saturation coverage by the MSM.

Fred Reed recently defined affirmative action as “the calculated recruitment of incompetence.” But since the myth of white discrimination against blacks is the entire rationale for Affirmative Action, multiculturalism requires constant race hoaxes in order to generate its talking points.

Affirmative Action has always been inseparable from the project of expanding racial power bases. Little work is expected of AA hires, leaving them ample leisure for making racist mischief. In addition to hiring racist black professors to fill departments of pseudo-scholarship, universities hire racist black counselors and officials to staff the bureaucratic underworld (e.g., “Student Life”, the office that “investigated” white UCSD fraternity members). FIRE`s founders, historian Alan Charles Kors and lawyer Harvey J. Silverglate, dubbed this “the Shadow University” in their eponymous, landmark book. Over the past 20 years or more, administrations have ruthlessly reduced their proportions of full-time faculty, while massively expanding their hiring of the highly-paid, full-time “Shadow University” personnel, who promote racial intimidation (e.g., “sensitivity training”). This group benefits directly from Hoax Crimes

One of the central experiences of higher education is coming into contact with ideas one disagrees with. White students know this experience in spades. Conversely, however, black and Hispanic students are simply provided with an echo chamber for their own prejudices. And now, though they break no laws, whites who criticize or mock those prejudices face arrest.

For all of the talk of its enriching qualities, college “diversity” almost always means the admission of black and Hispanic students and staff who are cognitively and morally unfit for college life.

The demand by UCSD`s black students, like black students elsewhere, that all campus whites be forced to submit to their will, was the expression of their moral unfitness to function in a university setting. They insist that the university be transformed into the antiversity: Jim Snow U.

That they are not expelled and arrested for their crimes, is evidence that the white bureaucrats running schools like UCSD and Columbia are likewise morally unfit for college life

Do we surrender to this savage new realityor, in Jon Voight`s words, “Save America as we knew it”?

Nicholas Stix [email him] lives in New York City, which he views from the perspective of its public transport system, experienced in his career as an educator. His weekly column appears at

Men`s News Daily and many other Web sites. He has also written for Middle American News, the New York

Daily News, New York Post, Newsday, Chronicles, Ideas on Liberty and the Weekly Standard. He maintains two blogs: A Different Drummerand Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.

Originally posted here:

2011 Campus Hate Crime Hoax Season About To Begin …

Fair Usage Law

November 24, 2016   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Hate crime hoax alert: Capital University student admits to fabricating several incidents – The College Fix

Hate crime hoax alert: Capital University student admits to fabricating several incidents A Capital University student has confessed to concocting several hate crime incidents at the school as a way to get attention. Senior Jalen Mitchell confessed to submitting multiple false reports to campus police after campus police asked him at the end of January if he had written a hate-filled note that was taped to his residences door. It was a way to try to get attention, to say Someone notice me, Im dying on the inside, Mitchell told the Chimes, the student newspaper. It seems Mitchell has been seeking notice for at least two years at the Columbus, Ohio school. In 2015, he pulled a stunt similar to this recent one, and the school responded as you might expect: a series of events, including an open conversation and an inclusivity march, to raise awareness of the possibility of hate crimes here on campus. From the Chimes story: Mitchell said that reporting the first incident helped the feelings he was having, but it didnt solve what was really happening on the inside, because he didnt seek proper help afterwards. He said this is why he continued with the other two reports, where he says the problem spiraled out of control. More recently, in the fall of 2016, Mitchell reported an assault on Astor Avenue, near the tennis courts. He told university police he was attacked on campus by a man with a knife during his walk home from visiting a friend. According to the safety bulletin, Mitchell received cuts and scratches on his neck, arms, leg and stomach, allegedly by a white male in his late 20s or early 30s with a full beard. MORE: Prosecutors wont file charges against Muslim student suspected of hate-crime hoax Mitchell wants those who are angry about the incidents being fabricated to know that hes sorry, and he never thought it would go as far as it did. I didnt mean to cause alarm, I didnt mean to scare anyone, Mitchell said. I just wanted to be noticed not for fame, just acknowledgement. After receiving help, he feels much more comfortable speaking about what hes feeling, and he realizes that fabricating the reports was not the way to accomplish anything. He hopes that everyone sees him as someone whos broken, been broken and is crying for help. Jalen adds that he wishes that those who feel his actions have delegitimatized the reporting of hate crimes will forgive him. The matter has been referred to (campus) Judicial Affairs. Read the full article. MORE: The best of the worst post-election pro-Trump incidents and hoaxes MORE: Black students expelled for hate-crime hoax after police cite no evidence for story Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter IMAGE: Shutterstock

Fair Usage Law

February 24, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Documents show physical evidence behind hate crime hoax arrest – Beloit College Round Table

A series of documents obtained by The Round Tablehaverevealed the physical evidence that lead to the recent arrestof Michael Tyler Kee20 for an incident involving Islamophobic graffiti on the Beloit College campus. In an affidavit submitted by Detective Amber Davies of the Beloit Police Department, it is reported that Officer Aaron Mueller of the Beloit PD responded to the initial vandalism complaint around 2:30 a.m. on the morning of Monday, Jan. 30, where he found the Islamophobic graffiti. Mueller also discovered a used can of red spray paint in a garbage can that was located in close proximity to Kees door. The affidavit goes on to state that when Officer Rick Valdez, an evidence technician, arrived on the scene, he discovered that Kee had admitted to having bought the can of red spray paint from Walmart at 11:30 p.m. on Sunday, Jan. 29. According to Valdez, Kee reported that [they] threw the spray paint out in the garbage because [they] found that it was for wood and not what [they] intended to use it for. Then, on Tuesday, Jan. 31, at approximately 4:30 p.m., the Beloit PD report that Kee admitted to purchasing the spray paint at Walmart in the City of Beloit and used the spray paint to write the racial slur on [their] own apartment door. Kee was arrested and has been tentatively charged with obstruction, disorderly conduct and criminal damage. When escorting Kee back to their room, officers also discovered red colored, overspray looking, spray paint on the carpet inside Kees apartment. The search warrant, which was authorized by Rock County Court Commissioner Stephen D. Meyer on Feb. 1, resulted in a piece of the carpet and a slip of paper being confiscated. The contents of the paperare unknown at this time.

Fair Usage Law

February 20, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Hijab-wearing student who concocted hate crime hoax after Trump election won’t face charges – TheBlaze.com

Prosecutors have declined to press charges against a hijab-wearing University of Michigan student who police said made up a hate crime she blamed on a white man just three days after Republican Donald Trump was elected president. The schools student newspaper, the Michigan Daily, noted a news release from Ann Arbor police indicating that the Washtenaw County prosecutors office declined to authorize criminal charges against the student. Her claim was that on the evening of Nov. 11 a white male approached her off-campus in Ann Arbor and demanded she remove her hijab a head scarf often worn by Muslim women or hed set her on fire with a lighter. The students description of the white male in question was fairly detailed: 20 to 30 years old, average height, athletic build, bad body odor, unkempt appearance and intoxicated with slurred speech. Police soon characterized the claim as ethnic intimidation, and outrage on campus that began after Trumps election intensified. Investigators conducted witness interviews and reviewed multiple surveillance videos of the area in question, the updated report read. During the course of the investigation, numerous inconsistencies in the statements provided by the alleged victim were identified. Following a thorough investigation, detectives have determined the incident in question did not occur. Steven Hiller, chief assistant prosecutor, told the College Fix the office will not comment further on this case. After the hoax was uncovered in December, police said the unidentified woman could be charged with filing a false police report, MLive reported. Sending it to the prosecutors office is standard procedure when the investigation has revealed the incident as reported was false, and the person who reported knows its false, Ann Arbor Police Detective Lt. Matthew Lige told the outlet. A felony charge also could have been filed against the woman since the crime she reported ethnic intimidation is itself a felony, MLive added.

Fair Usage Law

February 15, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

No Charges for Hijab Hate Hoax, Says Prosecutor – Breitbart News

Aphelandra Messer by John Binder15 Feb 2017Ann Arbor, MI0 SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER Washtenaw County Chief Deputy Assistant Prosecutor Steve Hiller told Michigan Live that the woman would not be charged with falsifying a police report. SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER Back in December 2016, police determined that the Michigan student had faked the hate crime attack after Ann Arbor police investigators and university officials interviewed witnesses and reviewed surveillance footage. Detectives reviewed hours of surveillance video, Detective Lt. Matthew Lige told Michigan Live at the time. We could not find her on any video. They just werent there. The Muslim woman originally claimed that she was walking on campus when a white man approached her and threatened to light her hijab on fire if she did not remove it. The woman said the man brandished the lighter that he was going to use. She claimed she removed her hijab and the man fled on foot. The woman reported the fake hate crime attack following President Donald Trumps victory against Hillary Clinton. In a similar hate hoax case, a New York City Muslim woman claimed that she was attacked by a group of Trump supporters while in the subway, an incident that the New York City Police Department (NYPD) said did not occur, as Breitbart Texas reported. John Binder is a contributor for Breitbart Texas. Follow him on Twitter at@JxhnBinder. Big Government, Breitbart Texas, Social Justice, Hate Crime, hate crime hoax, Hillary Clinton, hoax, Islam, Michigan, Muslim, New York City, President Donald Trump, Student, Trump, University of Michigan

Fair Usage Law

February 15, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Albany Hate Crime Hoax: What Really … – Louder With Crowder

Steven Crowder Thursday May 5 2016 Weve told you about the recent Albany Hate Crime Hoax (see LEAKED: The 911 Call That Exposed the Albany Racist Hate Crime Hoax and SURPRISE: Albany Students LIED about Racism. Heres the Truth). We can now report the following good newsthe girls have all be indicted! Albany County D.A. David Soares announced Monday that three defendants were indicted by an Albany County Grand Jury on charges related to an alleged incident that occurred on a CDTA bus on January 30th. Ariel Agudio, Asha Burwell and Alexis Briggs face several charges, including 3rd degree Assault and Falsely Reporting an Incident. The three UAlbany students had said they were attacked on board a CDTA bus because of their race. Audio and video from the bus did not support the allegations. The case went to the grand jury after the three 20-years olds refused a plea deal that would have required an apology. Oh, and theres also this Investigators say a review of multiple videos of the incident showed no evidence the women were victims of a crime or subjected to racial slurs. In fact, police said the women were the aggressors, assaulting a 19-year-old white woman. Police said surveillance and cellphone video, as well as eyewitness testimony, contradicted the womens account. The white men Agudio, Burwell and Briggs claimed assaulted them were actually trying to break up the fight. I especially want to point out that what happened on the bus was not a hate crime,’ University Police Chief Frank Wiley said in a statement, according to the Albany Times-Union. Hillary Clinton, your response? Good lord, doesnt Hillary have access to basic Google? Hell, even Bing would work. In a pinch. If you have to. This is similar to when Hillary and Obama trot out the wage gap statistic. Everybody whos conducted a basic amount of research knows it to be false, yet they parrot it as a talking point regardless. At a certain point, assuming ignorance is far too generous. Ive got to believethat theyre not idiots, that they know better, and they just dont care anymore. As far as the hoax itself does it come as any surprise? From Poop Swastika at Mizzou, to Mattress Girl at Columbia. From Shaun Kings fake hate crime incident(no really, he even checked the caucasian box in the police report which you can see here)to the UVA rape scandal, time after time these fabricated tales turn out to be hoaxes. Its come to bethe rule rather than the exception. You know who that hurts? The real victims of actual crimes. Remember when Lena Dunham falsely claimed that she was raped? Well, how do you think that affects victims of actual rape? Watch below.

Fair Usage Law

February 9, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Beloit Police Speak on Hate Crime Hoax – MyStateline.com

BELOIT – Beloit Police Chief David Zibolski is speaking out after a hate crime, reported on Beloit College’s campus, turned out to be fake. “There were certain indicators that led us to believe there was a little more to the story,” he said on Thursday. It all began with a real hate crime: An anti-semitic note passed under a student’s door at a residence hall. Zibolski says that threat was investigated immediately. “We were already investigating the first incident when this one came up, which obviously ratcheted up the fear and concern on campus,” he said. Zibolski says another student came forward with a hate crime report, this one involving anti-Muslim messages painted on a residence hall door. But after a thorough investigation, detectives discovered the victim, 20-year-old Michael Kee, had painted the messages himself. Kee admitting to the crime, saying he wanted the same attention the campus was giving the other student. Zibolski says false reports like Kee’s can increase the trauma for real hate crime victims. “Especially something of this magnitude, which has that kind of draw and fear that comes with it,” he explained. “That really can cause delegitimizing or diminishment of the public’s response when we have additional crimes of that nature.” Beloit College Spokesperson Whitney Helm says students have come together to help each other process both the real hate crime and the fake one. “Making sure that their fellow students feel supported, and definitely those communities and marginalized groups feel most supported,” said Helm. Zibolski says he wants the public to know his department will continue to investigate hate crimes vigorously, despite the false report. Kee is charged with obstructing, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage to property. Beloit Police are still investigating the other, legitimate hate crime.

Fair Usage Law

February 8, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so […]

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

Sister of Muslim Woman in ‘Trump’ Hate Crime Hoax Blames …

Ark. Bill Seeks to Ban Purchase of Junk Food With Food Stamps ‘Christmas Magic’: Marine Dressed as Santa Surprises Son at School Woman to Adopt Dying Best Friend’s Children: ‘We Love Each Other & I Love the Kids’ The sister of a woman charged in New York City for filing a false police report about drunk men on a subway train yelling “Trump” and “terrorist” at her blames the NYPD for bringing the alleged lie to light. Sara Seweidsaid the police never should have investigated her sister’s claims because law enforcement’s “first instinct” is to doubt and then disprove accusations, the New York Post reported: “Things snowballed out of our control because of the media reporters made things so much worse for our family. I had more than one cop tell me that theyve looked through all our social media and it doesnt look good that weve been vocal about certain issues they perceive to be anti -trump, anti-white and even anti-men. Yasmin Seweid of New Hyde Park, N.Y. said that on December 1, a group of inebriated white men began yelling “Trump, Trump!”, “Go back to your country!” and “Terrorist!” at heron a late-night subway train. Further investigation brought authorities to the conclusion that YasminSeweidfabricated the encounter and they subsequently charged her with filing a false report and obstructing government administration. Yasmin Seweidadmitted she made up the story because she did not want to be in trouble with her family for staying out late, Abby Huntsman reported. Prior to her arrest, Seweid also allegedly ran away to her sister’s home in upstate Fishkill, sparking a manhunt, the Post reported. Maryland Teen Shoots Deer That Invaded His Family’s Living Room A Professor Says the Term ‘Holiday Party’ May Also Not Be PC Enough Texas Police Department Waives Tickets, Asks for Toy Donations Instead

Fair Usage Law

December 19, 2016   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed

2011 Campus Hate Crime Hoax Season About To Begin …

Students are heading back to college, but I don`t expect to see any new campus hate crime hoaxes until spring. The simple reason: spring is hoax season. Who wants to march and protest out in the cold? But last spring saw a bumper crop! And this year, there will no doubt be morebecause of the dynamics of diversity in Obama`s Brave New America. It`s important to remember that the Hate Crime hysteria has real (white) victims. My May 26 VDARE.COM story, Report from Occupied America: Free the Mizzou Two! , told the increasingly common tale of two young men at University of Missouri Columbia (“Mizzou”), arrested, indicted, and coerced into copping guilty pleas, who hadn`t committed any crimesbeyond being white, male, and heterosexual. The whole episode was Kafkaesque. Then again, life today for a normal, red-blooded, American college boy increasingly is Kafkaesque. Meanwhile, Mizzou does have a serious problemviolent black crimes against members of the university community on and near campus. But university chancellor Brady Deaton, who denounced the innocent Mizzou Two, is silent about that. Between late January and late March of this year, black students on seven different college campuses in Ohio, California, Missouri and Tennessee were the victims of “hate crimes”. Just kidding! Except that the people behind these “hate crimes”, all obvious hoaxes, aren`t laughing. They seek to intimidate, disenfranchise, and imprison people who have broken no laws, based solely on the color of the latter`s skinand at the same time extort huge sums of money and take over their respective campuses. The real campus racism story, the one the MainStream Media refuse to tell, is one of black racial animus. The past 23 years have seen one black race hoax after another, on and off campus. Though many of these “hate crimes” remain technically unsolved,” I don`t know of any claims by campus “blacks” (or their non-black leftist comrades) that weren`t hoaxes. Thus the rational response to each lurid new claim should be skepticismon a par with what we bring to the daily e-mails promising us millions of dollars. And yet each new claim is treated by college administrators, police, and the media, as if no black race hoaxes had ever been exposed. And even after they are exposed as hoaxes, black students and their white enablers act as though they had been real. Simultaneously, they variously ignore, cover up, and lie about, the constant violent, racially-motivated crimes being perpetrated by blacks against whites (and Asians) on and off campus, and vilifying and attempting to destroy those whites who complain. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.) Get out your scorecards. During the 2010 spring semester, these campus “hate crimes” were allegedly committed: “We will not tolerate disrespect, racism or bias on our campus. One of my top priorities as chancellor is to increase diversity on our campus, and one of the best ways to do that is to create and maintain a welcoming campus climate for all.” [UT reports detail bias incidents; chancellor calls for change by Chloe White Kennedy, Knoxville News Sentinel, March 26, 2010.] (“Hate crimes” that were almost certainly copycat hoaxes targeted Jews and homosexuals at UC Davis, gay activists at the University of Idaho College of Law, and Jews at UC Berkeley. Hoax envy runs rampant.) What makes for a successful race hoax? The Hocking College Hoax never caught fire. The MSM doesn`t much care about community colleges. The Johnson & Wales Hoax also failed to get a national stage. You never know which race fraud will attain media stardom. But UCSD can serve as a case study. In retrospect, the reasons for the great success of the UCSD hoaxers were: Friends in high places: Pres. Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have repeatedly reiterated their support for anti-white racism (see also here), and for black race hoaxes; Media support: The MSM opposed California`s 1996 anti-affirmative action Prop. 209 and have sought to destroy it ever since its enactment, and thus devoted credulous, saturation coverage to the UCSD hoaxes; Numbers: With over 28,000 studentsonly 26 percent of whom are whiteUCSD is a huge, high-profile campus; Historic significance: In spite of a limited amount of stealth affirmative action, UCSD had held the line on academic standards better than any other UC campus, as witnessed by blacks comprising only 1.6 percent of its student body. Success at UCSD could presage the end of any standards in the UC system and the de facto gutting of Prop. 209 The UCSD hoaxes and protests appear to have been coordinated with the long-planned, March 4 statewide black and Hispanic student and faculty protests demanding more illegal privilegesmore race and ethnicity-based money, admissions, jobs and programs. Tenacity: The UCSD hoaxers never quit, committing hoax after hoax, lying about each in turn, and various additional crimes (trespassing, vandalism); Help on the Ground I: The hoaxers were supported by the faculty and students of entire programs and departments of pseudo-scholarship that exist, in order to maintain race-focused job mills, and promote race consciousness and irredentism: Ethnic Studies, “Chicano/a and Latino/a Arts & Humanities,” and African-American Studies; Help on the Ground II: Student government President Utsav Gupta [Email him] exploited the situation by illegally shutting down all student media until the student government overrode him and by seeking to institute illegal rules which would have permanently silenced all student media that was not anti-Western, with himself the arbiter. If a report that “Gupta said he is working with UCSD legal counsel” is true, Gupta also feloniously conspired with the UCSD administration to violate white students` civil rights; Help on the Ground III: Chancellor Fox exploited the situation by illegally “investigating” perfectly lawful behavior by white students, and by entering into negotiations with, and signing an agreement with the BSU, that violated the California Constitution and white students` Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Her administration conspired to cover up the true nature of the incidents by manipulating the UCSD Police Department, and withholding information. Instead of investigating the BSU students for possible race hoaxes and conspiracy to commit extortion, and arresting them for trespassing and vandalism, Fox praised them. She seeks to impose a joint Fox-BSU dictatorship on the school; Help on the Ground IV: San Diego City Attorney Jan Goldsmith [Email him] refused to release the name, race, or ethnicity of the confessed noose-hanger. As a veteran Hate Crime watcher, this naturally aroused my suspicions. But on March 31, CA Goldsmith`s communications director, Gina Coburn, e-mailed me: “In regards to your inquiry on the recent incidents at the University of California San Diego, the case having to do with a noose found in the library remains open and is under active investigation. We cannot comment for that reason.” Coburn [Email her] repeated her claim, during an April 1 telephone conversation, that the case was still “under investigation,” adding, “we are in the process of reviewing the case.” When I interjected, “reviewing, but not investigating?” she switched to “it`s an investigation and a review of the case.” I pointed out to her that the UCSD PD had completed the investigation, and handed over its case file and evidence to the City Attorney`s office on March 2. Coburn acknowledged that, but stayed on message. I retorted, “I`ve never heard of a case where a white suspect was alleged to have committed a hate crime, in which his name was suppressed. Ever.” Apparently, City Attorney Goldsmith does not believe that the Hate Crime law applies to non-whites. His illegal suppression of the confessed noose-hanger`s name was, I believe, part of a strategy to “disappear” the crime. The legal term for that is “conspiracy to obstruct justice.” Another political prosecutor. What a surprise! In mid-February, Chancellor Fox announced that she was investigating, and looking to discipline white fraternity members who, she said, had advertised the “Compton Cookout.” But as the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education`s (FIRE) Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Will Creeley, pointed out in a February 23 letter to Fox, for her even to “investigate,” much less discipline the fraternities, would violate their constitutional rights. In a February 22 letter to Gupta and Fox, Adam Kissel, the director of FIRE`s Individual Rights Defense Program, argued that Gupta`s actions in shutting down student media were “unconstitutional and morally questionable.” After FIRE`s Creeley and Kissel, and David Blair-Loy, the legal director of the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, notified Chancellor Fox that she was violating the law, she ignored them (and UCSD spokesman Rex Graham declined to respond to them), but quietly removed her threats. However, whites on campus still do not know their rights. At this point, it will likely require the UCSD administration losing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit, to change how it does business. Thus far, no individual or group has announced plans to file such a suit, and Creeley told me that FIRE does not engage in litigation. On February 22, 23 (PDF), and 24 (PDF), the ACLU`s Blair-Loy wrote variously to Chancellor Fox and student government president Utsav Gupta, pointing out that they were violating students` First Amendment rights. But those letters were contradicted, and thus neutralized, by a February 25 letter from Andrea Guerrero, the policy & field director of the same ACLU branch, and a longtime, embittered foe of Prop. 209, heartily supporting Fox` illegal, racist, anti-civil liberties campaign, and offering the ACLU`s help, in implementing it! In March, despite leaving detailed voice and e-mail messages at the ACLU`s national media office in New York, and speaking with someone there named “Pam” about the UCSD and Mizzou cases, I never got a response. But that was not surprising. In February, I had asked “Pam” for a statement regarding the terrorist threats that had caused four hotels in a row to cancel their bookings for the American Renaissance conference. She never responded the either. Blair-Loy notwithstanding, the ACLU is not a civil liberties organization. In line with its founding by a Communist, it is a civil rights a.k.a. civil privileges organization. It supports “Racial Justice” and “[Illegal] Immigrants` Rights,” i.e., it seeks to disenfranchise and dispossess America`s white majority. The knowledge that the “Compton Cookout” was the work of a black comedian, whose stage name is Jigaboo Jones, and that the noose was probably hung by a “minority student,” had no effect on the black students, Chancellor Fox or, for that matter, the media. But say that white students had indeed committed the acts in questionsave for the noose: They weren`t crimes anyway! Only the noose was illegal, due to an unconstitutional state law that blacks had demanded, and that the race hoax-mongering (here and here) NAACP had sponsored (PDF), following a wave of black noose hoaxesdo I detect a pattern here? And that was only a misdemeanor. Conversely, virtually all of the black students` 32 demands were illegal. They entail giving unqualified black students and personnel huge sums of money, admissions, and jobs, based solely on the color of their skin, in violation of the California Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment; instituting segregation (a “safe space” for black students), in violation of historic Supreme Court precedents; and violating white students` First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Though the Black Student Union avoided directly antagonizing Asian students, its demands also violated most of the same rights regarding Asians. The BSU depicted UCSDwhere white-on-black crime is virtually non-existentas a place where blacks are unsafe, and where vague “racial tension” rules, which the administration must somehow cause to disappear. The UCSD Police Department, which has jurisdiction for all on-campus matters, is supposed to be a professional, independent police agency, but on March 11, I learned otherwise. When I asked to speak with a Department public information officer, I was transferred to Rex Graham, [Email him] at UCSD Communications and Public Affairs. The interview consisted of my asking one question after another, and Graham refusing to answer me. Graham claimed that he couldn`t so much as tell me the race or ethnicity of the noose-hanger. But according to the booklet, Covering Campus Crime published by the Student Press Law Center (who can`t help their initials), that was untrue. No law prohibited him from giving me that information. More importantly, since the perp has now confessed to committing a crime, UCSD is legally obligated to release her name and other information about her. If UCSD is hiding the name of a confessed criminaleven if the law in question is obscene and unconstitutional, and the crime only a misdemeanorUCSD is, at the very least, violating the federal Clery Act, and at worst, engaged in a felonious conspiracy to obstruct justice. Chancellor Marye Anne Fox [Email her] should at least be fired, and at worst be arrested and prosecuted. When I asked Graham whether Chancellor Fox would be meeting with white student group leaders to parallel her announced regular meetings with the BSU, he did not even understand the question. UCSD Chancellor Fox` talk of “horrific acts of hate” expresses both her pomposity and lack of any moral compass. Truly “horrific acts of hate” would entail carnage such as the crimes against academics that I linked to earlier, or the racially-motivated atrocities that blacks regularly commit against non-academic whites. Nevertheless, the UCSD race hoaxes were so successful that on March 24 the UC Board of Regents “apologized” for the (non-existent) white hate crimes against black students, and proposed reintroducing affirmative action at UCSD (which it already did last year at UC Berkeley and UCLA), via the euphemism “holistic review” of applications. Someone will have to sue the Regents, in order to stop their illegal actions. If Chancellor Fox is not stopped from acceding to the black students` illegal demands, she will turn UCSD into a diversitopia. Footnote: UCSD`s handling of a May 10 incident dispelled any last doubt that Fox had any principles, as opposed to leftwing loyalties. During the Q&A following a David Horowitz speech, an Arab Muslim coed named Jumanah Imad Albahri made the mistake of trying to intimidate him. He turned the tables on her, and in a Perry Mason moment, got her to admit, on camera, that she supports genocide against all Jews, worldwide. UCSD`s response was underwhelming. Albahri lied, in insisting that her remark did not represent her true beliefs, and made a non-apology-apology condemning Horowitz. Even though the entire exchange had been captured on camera, the administration gave her a pass. Radical Muslims are part of the multicultural alliance; thus the UCSD administration sees them as allies, whereas it sees white, heterosexual, Christian menunless they wage war on their ownas enemies. The role of Jews on the multicultural campus is presently ambiguous. Jews who embrace genocidal anti-Semitism (parallel to white gentiles like Jane Elliott and Tim Wise, who embrace genocidal anti-white racism) are assured of privilege. Other Jews who are not anti-Semitic, e.g., those at Berkeley, are demanding a seat at the multicultural cannibals` feast. Jews who do not fit into either of the aforementioned groups are in trouble. Normally law enforcement authorities typically start with a crime, and then investigate said crime, in order to hopefully determine the identities of the perpetrators, and to arrest and prosecute the latter. But that isn`t the way things typically work when police say that they are “investigating a possible bias crime.” In such cases, either: No crime was committed, but police are seeking to intimidate whites (but never blacks) out of exercising their legal rights; No crime was committed, but the authorities seek to find, arrest, prosecute, and imprison a white, simply because he exercised his legal rights in a manner that they don`t like; or As in the UCSD noose case, a statute (which may be unconstitutional) may have been violated, but the authorities will only arrest and railroad someone (e.g., a white, Christian, male heterosexual) not from an unconstitutionally “protected class.” The modern academic race hoax movement began at Columbia University in March 1987. As I wrote in my January 2007 VDARE.com expos on the Duke Rape Hoax: “In three separate attacks, a mob of seven young black menstudents and non-studentsbeat up a total of five white Columbia University men students. “Following a by now dog-eared script, a group called Concerned Black Students at Columbia (CBSC), represented by “activist attorney” C. Vernon Mason, claimed that “a mob of white students had kicked and stomped a single black student and then went on a rampage shouting, `We`re going to kill you fg ns!`” “Although 22 witnesses had already contradicted the black attackers` claims, the latter were never arrested, and indeed, demanded that their white victims be arrested. “When CBSC held mini-riots, in which as many as 50 supporters, black and white alike, were arrested, protesting “against racial violence” and against the failure of the NYPD to follow their demand that police arrest the white victims, Columbia responded by promising more affirmative action in admissions and faculty hiring. “The Columbia race hoax received months-long saturation coverage by the national media; once the hoax was exposed, the media went silent. “Black students at six other East Coast university campuses, including Duke, were inspired to take over campus buildings. In each case, the black students decried “resurgent [white] racism” on campus and demanded and got concessions from the institution in question in the form of expanded affirmative action for black student applicants and professors. “There was a campus racism problem, alright, but it was that of resurgent black racism.” (Mason had just come off staging the Howard Beach Hoax with his accomplices Al Sharpton and Alton Maddox; later that year, the trio would promote the Tawana Brawley Hoax. Mason was later disbarred for misconduct and neglect regarding 20 different clients. Maddox was suspended indefinitely from practicing law for refusing to cooperate with an investigation into his conduct during the Brawley hoax.) But institutional racism was now entrenched at Columbia: In 1993, a black security guard managed to get three white man undergraduates who worked for the school escort service fired, based on a fake “racism” charge; (An escort service for students means a guard service that walks them from place to place late at night, to keep them safe, not what it means for adults like, say Eliot Spitzer. Q: Why is this service necessary for Columbia University? A: because it`s located near Harlem.) Around the same time, a black Columbia Law student claimed, without a shred of evidence, that a third-year, white man classmate, a devout Catholic, had made an obscene telephone call to her late at night. Columbia`s counsel turned the burden of proof upside down, making the impossible demand that the man prove that he was not guilty. Only when the white man`s lawyer threatened to sue Columbia did the school drop its persecution campaign. [Diversity at Columbia U.: When “Chocolate” and “Vanilla” are Fighting Words (PDF) by Jeffrey M. Duban, Heterodoxy, January 1995.]. Fast forward to October, 2007. When Madonna Constantine, a black affirmative action hire who was a tenured full professor (see here, here (PDF), and here) of multicultural counseling psychology at Columbia`s Teachers College, learned through her department sources that she was about to be fired for having engaged in serial plagiarism and other misconduct, a noose appeared on her office door. Although the case reeked of a hoax from the get-go, it received credulous, nationwide, saturation publicity (even from “rightwing” Fox News), and of course, inspired campus protests against “racism.” Though no one cited any laws that had been broken, the NYPD Hate Crimes Task Force and three different DOJ agencies investigated. The MSM promoted the myth that white racists had been planting nooses all over the country. The evildoer was never brought to justice. When Columbia finally fired Constantine in August, 2008, she asserted that she was the victim of a racist conspiracy, “structural racism,” and an “academic lynching,” and sued Teacher`s College for $200 million. (The suit is pending.) If anything, there was a conspiracy in support of Constantine. Meanwhile, as always, black criminals habitually target white and Asian Columbia students and personnel with robberies and burglaries; assault and battery (including gang assaults); rape and attempted murder; and murder (also here). And yet, none of these black attacks, as opposed to the black race hoaxes, has ever issued in rallies, “bias crime” charges, public denunciations by law enforcement or colleges, or saturation coverage by the MSM. Fred Reed recently defined affirmative action as “the calculated recruitment of incompetence.” But since the myth of white discrimination against blacks is the entire rationale for Affirmative Action, multiculturalism requires constant race hoaxes in order to generate its talking points. Affirmative Action has always been inseparable from the project of expanding racial power bases. Little work is expected of AA hires, leaving them ample leisure for making racist mischief. In addition to hiring racist black professors to fill departments of pseudo-scholarship, universities hire racist black counselors and officials to staff the bureaucratic underworld (e.g., “Student Life”, the office that “investigated” white UCSD fraternity members). FIRE`s founders, historian Alan Charles Kors and lawyer Harvey J. Silverglate, dubbed this “the Shadow University” in their eponymous, landmark book. Over the past 20 years or more, administrations have ruthlessly reduced their proportions of full-time faculty, while massively expanding their hiring of the highly-paid, full-time “Shadow University” personnel, who promote racial intimidation (e.g., “sensitivity training”). This group benefits directly from Hoax Crimes One of the central experiences of higher education is coming into contact with ideas one disagrees with. White students know this experience in spades. Conversely, however, black and Hispanic students are simply provided with an echo chamber for their own prejudices. And now, though they break no laws, whites who criticize or mock those prejudices face arrest. For all of the talk of its enriching qualities, college “diversity” almost always means the admission of black and Hispanic students and staff who are cognitively and morally unfit for college life. The demand by UCSD`s black students, like black students elsewhere, that all campus whites be forced to submit to their will, was the expression of their moral unfitness to function in a university setting. They insist that the university be transformed into the antiversity: Jim Snow U. That they are not expelled and arrested for their crimes, is evidence that the white bureaucrats running schools like UCSD and Columbia are likewise morally unfit for college life Do we surrender to this savage new realityor, in Jon Voight`s words, “Save America as we knew it”? Nicholas Stix [email him] lives in New York City, which he views from the perspective of its public transport system, experienced in his career as an educator. His weekly column appears at Men`s News Daily and many other Web sites. He has also written for Middle American News, the New York Daily News, New York Post, Newsday, Chronicles, Ideas on Liberty and the Weekly Standard. He maintains two blogs: A Different Drummerand Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.

Fair Usage Law

November 24, 2016   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."