Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Obama, Boehner and Netanyahu – who’s playing politics over Iran? – Video



Obama, Boehner and Netanyahu – who's playing politics over Iran?
Today's Congressional address by Israel's prime minister has divided opinion among his supporters and on Capital HIll. “Benjamin Netanyahu's invitation by House Speaker John Boehner”:http://www.n …

By: euronews (in English)

Read the rest here:
Obama, Boehner and Netanyahu – who’s playing politics over Iran? – Video

Fair Usage Law

March 3, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Obama says Netanyahu’s speech on Iran is a mistake – Video



Obama says Netanyahu's speech on Iran is a mistake
Subscribe: http://smarturl.it/reuterssubscribe In an exclusive interview with Reuters, U.S. President Obama reaffirms support for Israel while speaking out against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin…

By: Reuters

More:
Obama says Netanyahu’s speech on Iran is a mistake – Video

Fair Usage Law

March 2, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Netanyahu warns Iran deal could ‘threaten the survival’ of …

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Monday that a potential nuclear deal with Iran “could threaten the survival of Israel,” as he kicked off a contentious visit to the United States meant to build the case against such an agreement.

The centerpiece of his visit will be an address to Congress on Tuesday.But speaking first to The American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington, the Israeli leader underscored the dangers he said are posed by Iran, which he called the world’s “foremost sponsor of state terrorism.”

“Iran envelops the entire world with its tentacles of terror,” he said, displaying a map showing various connections between Iran and terror groups. He warned Iran could pursue Israel’s destruction if it obtained a nuclear weapon.

“We must not let that happen,” Netanyahu said.

Both the Obama and Netanyahu administrations, as a matter of policy, agree that Iran must not be able to obtain a nuclear weapon. But the Israeli leader has concerns that the framework of the current diplomatic talks could lead to an ineffective deal.

His address to Congress on Tuesday has meanwhile become the source of immense tension between the two governments. The speech was arranged at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, but without the involvement of President Obama.Some Democrats plan to boycott that speech, and the U.S. president has no plans to meet with the prime minister — though the White House insists this is out of a desire not to appear to be influencing upcoming Israeli elections.On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said in an interview with ABC’s “This Week,” before he arrived in Switzerland for talks with Iran’s foreign minister, that the administration did not want the event “turned into some great political football.”

But it appeared too late for that. With accusations flying on Capitol Hill, Netanyahu’s visit has plunged the rocky Obama-Netanyahu relationship to perhaps its lowest point.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Fox News on Monday this is the “worst” he’s ever seen the U.S.-Israel relationship. He claimed critics are acting “in such a hysterical fashion” because they’re concerned Netanyahu will make a “compelling argument” against the pending Iran agreement.

Netanyahu, though, stressed Monday that the alliance is “stronger than ever” despite the current disagreement, as he gently mocked the recent media coverage.

“Never has so much been written about a speech that hasn’t been given,” he said. Netanyahu also said he meant no “disrespect” to Obama or his office in agreeing to address Congress. He said he “deeply” appreciates all Obama has done for Israel and did not intend to “inject Israel into the American partisan debate.”

Original post:
Netanyahu warns Iran deal could ‘threaten the survival’ of …

Fair Usage Law

March 2, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Nuclear deal with Iran gets closer as Netanyahu comes to Washington

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be in Washington, trying to spur Congress to cut short what he considers a feeble and dangerous deal in the works over Irans nuclear program.

Simultaneously, as if on a split screen, Secretary of State John F. Kerry will be in Montreaux, Switzerland, trying to nail down a historic accord that could give the world a year to react if Iran were to stockpile nuclear materials for a bomb and that could wean Iran away from international pariah status.

The tension between those two competing worldviews on Iran one judging the risks too great to take and the other finding a greater risk in walking away from a deal has persisted for years. But it has reached an apex for a simple reason: Iran and the United States, plus its five negotiating partners, appear closer to a deal than at any time in more than a decade of talks.

The achievements to date are so huge, unprecedented really, that it is very, very, very difficult for both parties to leave the negotiating table and go backward, said Hossein Mousavian, an Iranian diplomat who once was spokesman for his countrys nuclear negotiating team and is a visiting scholar at Princeton University.

In his speech to a joint session of Congress, Netanyahu will elaborate on the alarm he has raised frequently Iran cannot be trusted to keep its word and the still-incomplete deal poses an existential threat to Israel and the world at large.

The ramifications of no deal, however, are also perilous. Congress would all but certainly impose more sanctions on an Iranian economy that has already been buffeted by harsh financial measures. Other countries could ignore the call to continue isolating Iran economically, unraveling a united diplomatic front that the Obama administration has worked strenuously to maintain.

Iran would likely ramp up uranium enrichment, bringing it closer to the bombmaking capability that world powers have worked for so long to deny it. The United States would consider launching a military strike to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

One question that I hope both Republicans and Democrats ask Netanyahu while hes here is to be clear about what alternative is available to us, said Gary Sick, who served on the National Security Council under both Republican and Democratic administrations and is a scholar at Columbia University’s Middle East Institute. Its one thing to say wed like to have an agreement in which Iran has no capability of building a nuclear weapon, under any circumstances, at any time in the future. But that is by definition impossible.

The talks with Iran have been grinding on since President George W. Bushs first term. The West wants to monitor and curtail Irans nuclear program, which began under the shah with help from the United States under an Eisenhower-era program called Atoms for Peace.

Iran insists that it uses its nuclear technology only for peaceful purposes, such as medical testing and energy, but many in the West fear that the authoritarian government aims to stockpile high-level nuclear material and eventually produce nuclear weapons.

Read more:
Nuclear deal with Iran gets closer as Netanyahu comes to Washington

Fair Usage Law

February 28, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Iran hacked an American casino, U.S. says

For the first time, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the Iranian government was behind a damaging cyberattack on the Sands Las Vegas Corporation (LVS) in 2014. He mentioned it while testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week.

Sands owns several well-known properties, including The Venetian and Palazzo in Las Vegas and two other resorts in Macao and Singapore.

The attack made headlines, because Las Vegas Sands is a large publicly-traded company. In February 2014, it said unidentified hackers broke into its computer network and stole customer data: credit card data, Social Security numbers and driver’s licenses numbers.

At the time, it sounded like just another digital break-in. But the nation’s leading intelligence official says it was much worse than that.

On Thursday, Clapper described it as a “destructive cyberattack” on par with North Korea’s hack of Sony. In that case, hackers wiped computers, destroyed data and froze the company to a halt.

It’s unknown what damage Iranian hackers did to the casino company. Las Vegas Sands declined to comment for this story.

However, the company thinks hackers broke into its casino in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and “certain company data may have been destroyed,” according to documents it filed Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Of all targets, why Adelson’s company? The businessman is a major donor to Republican politicians. He’s staunchly pro-Israel, the ultimate foe of the current Iranian regime. And in the past, Adelson has casually suggested that the U.S. drop nuclear bombs on Iran.

If Clapper’s assertion is true, this is the latest example of a frightening trend: governments are hacking private companies.

Chinese hacker spies have stolen business plans from U.S. power plants. Russian hackers have broken into American and European oil and gas companies. And most recently, leaked documents show American and British spies hacked a phone SIM card maker in the Netherlands.

Read the rest here:
Iran hacked an American casino, U.S. says

Fair Usage Law

February 27, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Kerry and Irans Zarif meet again in Geneva in search of a nuclear deal

Secretary of State John F. Kerry joined high-level talks Sunday in Geneva that could curtail Irans nuclear program, as negotiators race to reach a comprehensive agreement by the end of next month.

Kerry met with his Iranian counterpart, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in the lakeside city. In an indication that the talks are at a sensitive stage, they were joined by Ernest Moniz, the secretary of energy, and Irans nuclear chief, Ali Akbar Salehi. Hossein Fereydoon, the brother of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and one of his close aides, also participated. Zarif told reporters that Rouhanis brother came to ensure better coordination with the president.

Both Kerry and Zarif, however, sought to play down speculation that an agreement was imminent. Kerry said Saturday in London that significant gaps remain, a status update that has changed little in months. There is still a distance to travel, he said.

And Zarif told reporters Sunday that there are still differences in negotiating positions staked out in the talks, which he recently characterized as so spirited at times that his bodyguards, overhearing his raised voice, have poked their heads into the room to make sure nothing was wrong.

The fundamental gap, in my view, is psychological, Zarif said. Some Western countries, the United States in particular, see sanctions as an asset, a lever to exert pressure on Iran. As long as this thinking persists, it will be very hard, difficult to reach a settlement.

The United States and five other partners in the talks Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia are working to strike a deal in which Iran would agree to curb its ability to make nuclear weapons, something Iran says it has no interest in manufacturing. In exchange, international sanctions against Iran would be eased and could eventually be lifted.

The talks are taking place amid a heightened sense of urgency. Though a temporary agreement is in place through June, Kerry has said that if the parties cannot agree on the major principles of a long-term accord by late March, theres no point in continuing. Deadlines for a pact have been extended twice, and Kerry said President Obama is unlikely to ask for a third extension.

In addition, the secretive talks are being held barely a week before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to deliver a controversial speech to Congress that he says will lay out the case for why the Israeli government considers the deal with Iran very dangerous, for Israel and for the world.

Netanyahu has been highly critical of the Obama administrations handling of the talks. On Sunday, he opened a cabinet meeting saying he was astonished that negotiations were continuing after a leaked report from the International Atomic Energy Agency reportedly said Iran was not fully cooperating with the agencys monitors. Netanyahu said the deal could allow Iran to develop the nuclear capabilities that threaten our existence.

In Tehran, many hard-liners are opposed to making concessions on the nuclear program in talks with the West, particularly the United States.

Read the original:
Kerry and Irans Zarif meet again in Geneva in search of a nuclear deal

Fair Usage Law

February 22, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Irans Israel intentions

Israel is the one nation whose existence is most threatened by Iran.

Understand this one fact and you understand why the Israelis are so alarmed by the deal President Obama is trying to strike with Tehran.

Understand this and you also understand that it gives Jerusalem a far different stake in these talks than the nations negotiating the deal: the US, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, France and Germany.

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put it in remarks to American Jewish leaders this past Monday: A regime that openly calls for Israels destruction would thus finally have the means to realize its genocidal aims.

Thats precisely why Netanyahu is so intent on putting his case to both Congress and the American people, even at the risk of partisan political fallout for Israel in Washington.

The gist of the Obama administrations offer to Iran is to make it a regional ally in the fight against ISIS. Its true Shia Tehran has no love for the fanatically Sunni Islamic State.

But treating Iran as a regional force for stability ignores Irans continuing role as a sponsor and fomenter of terrorism, not to mention its use of proxy forces such as Hamas and Hezbollah to expand its sphere of influence.

It is doing all this even without a nuclear capability. Just the other day, a top commander of Irans Revolutionary Guard openly boasted that we are witnessing the export of the Islamic revolution throughout the region, from Bahrain and Iraq, to Syria, Yemen and North Africa.

But the threat posed by Irans spreading influence in the Middle East in Baghdad, in Damascus, in Beirut, in Sanaa is not limited to the region.

Its a problem, as Netanyahu no doubt will stress to Congress, that threatens Americas security interests and those of the entire Western world. A bad nuclear deal with Iran will only make it worse.

See the article here:
Irans Israel intentions

Fair Usage Law

February 22, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

USA vs IRAN (Military Power) World War III 2015 HD – Video



USA vs IRAN (Military Power) World War III 2015 HD
Iranian Military Power is Israel's Worst Nightmare – IRAN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY 2015 IRAN MILITARY POWER 2015 IRAN VS ISRAEL WW3 WWIII Iran Air force Iran Navy Iran ARMY Army IRI.

By: Dan The Man

Read the rest here:
USA vs IRAN (Military Power) World War III 2015 HD – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Iran Major Gen Jafari :Israel sent message we did not know/killing Iranian Gen wasn’t our attention – Video



Iran Major Gen Jafari :Israel sent message we did not know/killing Iranian Gen wasn't our attention
Israeli source: We meant to target low-ranking guerrillas in Syria, not Iranian general An Iranian general killed in an Israeli air strike in Syria was not its intended target and Israel believed…

By: ali javid

See more here:
Iran Major Gen Jafari :Israel sent message we did not know/killing Iranian Gen wasn’t our attention – Video

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Obama, Boehner and Netanyahu – who’s playing politics over Iran? – Video




Obama, Boehner and Netanyahu – who's playing politics over Iran? Today's Congressional address by Israel's prime minister has divided opinion among his supporters and on Capital HIll. “Benjamin Netanyahu's invitation by House Speaker John Boehner”:http://www.n … By: euronews (in English)

Fair Usage Law

March 3, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Obama says Netanyahu’s speech on Iran is a mistake – Video




Obama says Netanyahu's speech on Iran is a mistake Subscribe: http://smarturl.it/reuterssubscribe In an exclusive interview with Reuters, U.S. President Obama reaffirms support for Israel while speaking out against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin… By: Reuters

Fair Usage Law

March 2, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Netanyahu warns Iran deal could ‘threaten the survival’ of …

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Monday that a potential nuclear deal with Iran “could threaten the survival of Israel,” as he kicked off a contentious visit to the United States meant to build the case against such an agreement. The centerpiece of his visit will be an address to Congress on Tuesday.But speaking first to The American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Washington, the Israeli leader underscored the dangers he said are posed by Iran, which he called the world’s “foremost sponsor of state terrorism.” “Iran envelops the entire world with its tentacles of terror,” he said, displaying a map showing various connections between Iran and terror groups. He warned Iran could pursue Israel’s destruction if it obtained a nuclear weapon. “We must not let that happen,” Netanyahu said. Both the Obama and Netanyahu administrations, as a matter of policy, agree that Iran must not be able to obtain a nuclear weapon. But the Israeli leader has concerns that the framework of the current diplomatic talks could lead to an ineffective deal. His address to Congress on Tuesday has meanwhile become the source of immense tension between the two governments. The speech was arranged at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, but without the involvement of President Obama.Some Democrats plan to boycott that speech, and the U.S. president has no plans to meet with the prime minister — though the White House insists this is out of a desire not to appear to be influencing upcoming Israeli elections.On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said in an interview with ABC’s “This Week,” before he arrived in Switzerland for talks with Iran’s foreign minister, that the administration did not want the event “turned into some great political football.” But it appeared too late for that. With accusations flying on Capitol Hill, Netanyahu’s visit has plunged the rocky Obama-Netanyahu relationship to perhaps its lowest point. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Fox News on Monday this is the “worst” he’s ever seen the U.S.-Israel relationship. He claimed critics are acting “in such a hysterical fashion” because they’re concerned Netanyahu will make a “compelling argument” against the pending Iran agreement. Netanyahu, though, stressed Monday that the alliance is “stronger than ever” despite the current disagreement, as he gently mocked the recent media coverage. “Never has so much been written about a speech that hasn’t been given,” he said. Netanyahu also said he meant no “disrespect” to Obama or his office in agreeing to address Congress. He said he “deeply” appreciates all Obama has done for Israel and did not intend to “inject Israel into the American partisan debate.”

Fair Usage Law

March 2, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Nuclear deal with Iran gets closer as Netanyahu comes to Washington

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will be in Washington, trying to spur Congress to cut short what he considers a feeble and dangerous deal in the works over Irans nuclear program. Simultaneously, as if on a split screen, Secretary of State John F. Kerry will be in Montreaux, Switzerland, trying to nail down a historic accord that could give the world a year to react if Iran were to stockpile nuclear materials for a bomb and that could wean Iran away from international pariah status. The tension between those two competing worldviews on Iran one judging the risks too great to take and the other finding a greater risk in walking away from a deal has persisted for years. But it has reached an apex for a simple reason: Iran and the United States, plus its five negotiating partners, appear closer to a deal than at any time in more than a decade of talks. The achievements to date are so huge, unprecedented really, that it is very, very, very difficult for both parties to leave the negotiating table and go backward, said Hossein Mousavian, an Iranian diplomat who once was spokesman for his countrys nuclear negotiating team and is a visiting scholar at Princeton University. In his speech to a joint session of Congress, Netanyahu will elaborate on the alarm he has raised frequently Iran cannot be trusted to keep its word and the still-incomplete deal poses an existential threat to Israel and the world at large. The ramifications of no deal, however, are also perilous. Congress would all but certainly impose more sanctions on an Iranian economy that has already been buffeted by harsh financial measures. Other countries could ignore the call to continue isolating Iran economically, unraveling a united diplomatic front that the Obama administration has worked strenuously to maintain. Iran would likely ramp up uranium enrichment, bringing it closer to the bombmaking capability that world powers have worked for so long to deny it. The United States would consider launching a military strike to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. One question that I hope both Republicans and Democrats ask Netanyahu while hes here is to be clear about what alternative is available to us, said Gary Sick, who served on the National Security Council under both Republican and Democratic administrations and is a scholar at Columbia University’s Middle East Institute. Its one thing to say wed like to have an agreement in which Iran has no capability of building a nuclear weapon, under any circumstances, at any time in the future. But that is by definition impossible. The talks with Iran have been grinding on since President George W. Bushs first term. The West wants to monitor and curtail Irans nuclear program, which began under the shah with help from the United States under an Eisenhower-era program called Atoms for Peace. Iran insists that it uses its nuclear technology only for peaceful purposes, such as medical testing and energy, but many in the West fear that the authoritarian government aims to stockpile high-level nuclear material and eventually produce nuclear weapons.

Fair Usage Law

February 28, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Iran hacked an American casino, U.S. says

For the first time, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the Iranian government was behind a damaging cyberattack on the Sands Las Vegas Corporation (LVS) in 2014. He mentioned it while testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week. Sands owns several well-known properties, including The Venetian and Palazzo in Las Vegas and two other resorts in Macao and Singapore. The attack made headlines, because Las Vegas Sands is a large publicly-traded company. In February 2014, it said unidentified hackers broke into its computer network and stole customer data: credit card data, Social Security numbers and driver’s licenses numbers. At the time, it sounded like just another digital break-in. But the nation’s leading intelligence official says it was much worse than that. On Thursday, Clapper described it as a “destructive cyberattack” on par with North Korea’s hack of Sony. In that case, hackers wiped computers, destroyed data and froze the company to a halt. It’s unknown what damage Iranian hackers did to the casino company. Las Vegas Sands declined to comment for this story. However, the company thinks hackers broke into its casino in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania and “certain company data may have been destroyed,” according to documents it filed Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Of all targets, why Adelson’s company? The businessman is a major donor to Republican politicians. He’s staunchly pro-Israel, the ultimate foe of the current Iranian regime. And in the past, Adelson has casually suggested that the U.S. drop nuclear bombs on Iran. If Clapper’s assertion is true, this is the latest example of a frightening trend: governments are hacking private companies. Chinese hacker spies have stolen business plans from U.S. power plants. Russian hackers have broken into American and European oil and gas companies. And most recently, leaked documents show American and British spies hacked a phone SIM card maker in the Netherlands.

Fair Usage Law

February 27, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Kerry and Irans Zarif meet again in Geneva in search of a nuclear deal

Secretary of State John F. Kerry joined high-level talks Sunday in Geneva that could curtail Irans nuclear program, as negotiators race to reach a comprehensive agreement by the end of next month. Kerry met with his Iranian counterpart, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in the lakeside city. In an indication that the talks are at a sensitive stage, they were joined by Ernest Moniz, the secretary of energy, and Irans nuclear chief, Ali Akbar Salehi. Hossein Fereydoon, the brother of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and one of his close aides, also participated. Zarif told reporters that Rouhanis brother came to ensure better coordination with the president. Both Kerry and Zarif, however, sought to play down speculation that an agreement was imminent. Kerry said Saturday in London that significant gaps remain, a status update that has changed little in months. There is still a distance to travel, he said. And Zarif told reporters Sunday that there are still differences in negotiating positions staked out in the talks, which he recently characterized as so spirited at times that his bodyguards, overhearing his raised voice, have poked their heads into the room to make sure nothing was wrong. The fundamental gap, in my view, is psychological, Zarif said. Some Western countries, the United States in particular, see sanctions as an asset, a lever to exert pressure on Iran. As long as this thinking persists, it will be very hard, difficult to reach a settlement. The United States and five other partners in the talks Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia are working to strike a deal in which Iran would agree to curb its ability to make nuclear weapons, something Iran says it has no interest in manufacturing. In exchange, international sanctions against Iran would be eased and could eventually be lifted. The talks are taking place amid a heightened sense of urgency. Though a temporary agreement is in place through June, Kerry has said that if the parties cannot agree on the major principles of a long-term accord by late March, theres no point in continuing. Deadlines for a pact have been extended twice, and Kerry said President Obama is unlikely to ask for a third extension. In addition, the secretive talks are being held barely a week before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to deliver a controversial speech to Congress that he says will lay out the case for why the Israeli government considers the deal with Iran very dangerous, for Israel and for the world. Netanyahu has been highly critical of the Obama administrations handling of the talks. On Sunday, he opened a cabinet meeting saying he was astonished that negotiations were continuing after a leaked report from the International Atomic Energy Agency reportedly said Iran was not fully cooperating with the agencys monitors. Netanyahu said the deal could allow Iran to develop the nuclear capabilities that threaten our existence. In Tehran, many hard-liners are opposed to making concessions on the nuclear program in talks with the West, particularly the United States.

Fair Usage Law

February 22, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Irans Israel intentions

Israel is the one nation whose existence is most threatened by Iran. Understand this one fact and you understand why the Israelis are so alarmed by the deal President Obama is trying to strike with Tehran. Understand this and you also understand that it gives Jerusalem a far different stake in these talks than the nations negotiating the deal: the US, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put it in remarks to American Jewish leaders this past Monday: A regime that openly calls for Israels destruction would thus finally have the means to realize its genocidal aims. Thats precisely why Netanyahu is so intent on putting his case to both Congress and the American people, even at the risk of partisan political fallout for Israel in Washington. The gist of the Obama administrations offer to Iran is to make it a regional ally in the fight against ISIS. Its true Shia Tehran has no love for the fanatically Sunni Islamic State. But treating Iran as a regional force for stability ignores Irans continuing role as a sponsor and fomenter of terrorism, not to mention its use of proxy forces such as Hamas and Hezbollah to expand its sphere of influence. It is doing all this even without a nuclear capability. Just the other day, a top commander of Irans Revolutionary Guard openly boasted that we are witnessing the export of the Islamic revolution throughout the region, from Bahrain and Iraq, to Syria, Yemen and North Africa. But the threat posed by Irans spreading influence in the Middle East in Baghdad, in Damascus, in Beirut, in Sanaa is not limited to the region. Its a problem, as Netanyahu no doubt will stress to Congress, that threatens Americas security interests and those of the entire Western world. A bad nuclear deal with Iran will only make it worse.

Fair Usage Law

February 22, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

USA vs IRAN (Military Power) World War III 2015 HD – Video




USA vs IRAN (Military Power) World War III 2015 HD Iranian Military Power is Israel's Worst Nightmare – IRAN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY 2015 IRAN MILITARY POWER 2015 IRAN VS ISRAEL WW3 WWIII Iran Air force Iran Navy Iran ARMY Army IRI. By: Dan The Man

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed

Iran Major Gen Jafari :Israel sent message we did not know/killing Iranian Gen wasn’t our attention – Video




Iran Major Gen Jafari :Israel sent message we did not know/killing Iranian Gen wasn't our attention Israeli source: We meant to target low-ranking guerrillas in Syria, not Iranian general An Iranian general killed in an Israeli air strike in Syria was not its intended target and Israel believed… By: ali javid

Fair Usage Law

February 19, 2015   Posted in: Iran  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."