Archive for the ‘Israel Apartheid’ Category

President Trump: ‘We’ll Be Talking About Gun Laws’

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 9: President Donald Trump listens during a meeting with leaders from small community banks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, March. 09, 2017. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
President Trump reacted on Tuesday to the Las Vegas attack by saying, “We’ll be talking about gun laws as time goes by.”

Read more here:

President Trump: ‘We’ll Be Talking About Gun Laws’

Fair Usage Law

October 3, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

A new threat to Israel’s apartheid state: Bedouin toddlers – Arab News

As much of the world engages with a variety of security threats ranging from car rammings, bombings and stabbings to neo-Nazi white supremacist marches, the Israeli army has been dealing with its own security priorities too. This supposed democratic bastion of western civilization does indeed have many legitimate security threats but one does have to wonder how a small Portakabin serving as a Bedouin kindergarten in the West Bank threatened the might of the Israeli army. A kindergarten. Who was it used by? Palestinian refugee children. This was not some military training center or weapons factory but a ramshackle education establishment for toddlers serving the small community of Jabal Al Baba, 4km to the east of Jerusalem. It warranted an early morning visit of Israeli forces that wiped the site clean, taking all the school equipment as well. Nothing was left at all. If you visit this small community of 56 families you see the residue of previous demolitions, even of the threatening animal pens. All in all, their community head tells me, 48 structures have been demolished in the past three years. Originally there were forced out of the Negev desert in Israel in 1950. Intriguingly this small plot of land is part owned by the Vatican, hence the name Jabal Al Baba or Popes mountain. It was in fact a gift from King Hussein of Jordan to the then Pope Paul VI during his 1964 visit. The week before this round of demolitions, Israeli soldiers had been removing threatening solar panels that supplied the kindergarten and elementary school of the neighboring community of Abu Nuwar. The existing classroom is now too hot even to be used and they make use of the local barbershop for elementary school classes. In February 2016, trailers donated by the French government for use as a school were demolished. Back in 2014, I had visited another Bedouin community close by that had had its newly installed swings confiscated because they constituted an illegal construction. An incredible 56 Palestinian schools in Area C communities in the West Bank have Israeli demolition orders outstanding against them. The Israeli excuse is that these buildings do not have permits and are illegal. Who issues, or rather does not issue permits? The Israeli military authorities. Who in the West Bank build illegally, often without permits, without threat of demolition and typically with official assistance? Israeli settlers.

The demolition of a small kindergarten on prime real estate east of Jerusalem is part of a larger settlement project that will make any Palestinian state unviable.

Chris Doyle

Link:

A new threat to Israel’s apartheid state: Bedouin toddlers – Arab News

Fair Usage Law

August 23, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

MKs ‘snubbed’ on South Africa trip as govt officials refuse meetings – The Jerusalem Post

A delegation of five MKs visited South Africa recently in a bid to meet with government officials, improve ties with the country and connect with the 70,000-strong Jewish community.

The delegation led by the Zionist Unions Nachman Shai also included Amir Ohana and Nurit Koren from the Likud, and Zouheir Bahloul and Michal Biran from the Zionist Union.

However, the MKs were snubbed in Cape Town by the countrys Parliament, where the ruling African National Congress holds the majority. A large contingent of South African parliamentarians openly rejected the delegations visit.

Shai, speaking with The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday, said it was wrong that the South African parliamentarians refused to meet with the delegation and made an issue out of it.

We asked to see them and they refused…Israel-South Africa relations are not hateful there is no animosity. We have a long history with South Africa.

Israels security and military relations with the Apartheid government is not a secret although Israel never supported Apartheid but for the ANC and many South Africans, it [this relationship] is not forgotten, he said.

Since the beginning of the new government [under Nelson Mandela in 1994], Israel has had some difficulties connecting with South Africa BDS there is very strong the [2001 anti-Israel] Durban conference and the very fact that they [Parliament] put out a press release that they dont want to meet with us, is wrong, Shai continued.

Shai said the August 14-22 visit could have been a turning point in relations between the countries as Israel has much to offer South Africa in terms of technology, human resources, health and education.

I believe we should talk about the future the past will not get us anywhere. We should have been received by the government and our fellow [South African] parliamentary colleagues it could have worked very well, Shai told the Post.

Although shunned by Parliament, Shai and the delegation still met with several senior ANC members including former-interim president Kgalema Motlanthe and Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma a presidential candidate, as well as leaders of the opposition parties and the mayor of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba.

Asked about the discussion with Dlamini- Zuma, Shai said she listened more than she spoke, which was good because Israel doesnt always have access to South Africa.

We spoke about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli-South Africa relations, he said.

The delegation members, who returned home on Tuesday, said they were not deterred from continuing to improve ties between the countries and to connect with South Africas warm and welcoming Jewish community.

We wanted to talk to them [Jewish community] and hear from them, and they are very eager to hear about whats going on in Israel, Shai said.

For Shai, such meetings were the highlight of the trip. We were warmly received by the Johannesburg and Cape Town [Jewish] communities. I was impressed by the [Jewish] education system how Judaism and Israel are integrated together… I will remember for the rest of my life the conversations and questions we had with the students from Herzlia and King David schools, he said.

Being able to see South Africa and the many different aspects of the country, the Jewish community and the people was fascinating it was a very successful trip, he said.

South Africas community is quite small but it has strong foundations and is strongly Zionist… Just to visit the Jewish community here without political meetings is extremely important sometimes home is very far away and sometimes its close and Israel is the Jewish peoples home the point of these visits is to see what way Israel can help and what way Israel can give to Jewish communities, Shai explained.

Asked if there would be more MK visits to South Africa, Shai said he could not see it happening soon as it takes a lot of effort to organize.

I hope maybe in one or two years this will happen again, maybe if my fellow colleagues here [in Israel], hear our stories, they will want to go as well, he concluded.

The previous official visit by a delegation of MKs to visit South Africa was in 2004, when a group from the Likud met with then-president Thabo Mbeki. He welcomed them as friends a fairly different way from how they were received by the countrys ruling party this time around. The 2004 visit was the first time the Likud held talks with the South African government about Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Israeli Embassy in South Africa said the recent delegation was the result of cooperation between the Knesset, the Foreign Ministry and the Jewish Agency.

They have also had positive engagements with the key figures of the Christian and business communities, the embassy said.

The delegation proves that dialogue is key in increasing understanding of the challenges and opportunities between our great nations, Ambassador Lior Keinan said.

The delegation reiterated its commitment to sharing Israels expertise in agriculture, water and hi-tech.

The embassy continues to explore a plethora of avenues for cooperation between Israel and South Africa, and this delegation is a great step toward that goal, it said.

Share on facebook

Go here to read the rest:

MKs ‘snubbed’ on South Africa trip as govt officials refuse meetings – The Jerusalem Post

Fair Usage Law

August 23, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

New York Times distorts reality of Israel’s apartheid walls – Mintpress News (blog)

Isabel Kershner,writing inThe New York Times, claims the aboveground fences and sections of concrete wall [that] run along and through parts of the West Bank are a legacy of Palestinian suicide bombings during the second intifada. But she fails to note many observers contention that due to the fact85 percentof the barrier runsinsidethe occupied West Bank, Israels construction of it appears to be far more of aland grabthan anything to do with security.

More here:

New York Times distorts reality of Israel’s apartheid walls – Mintpress News (blog)

Fair Usage Law

August 22, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Portuguese photographers launch Israel boycott pledge – Mondoweiss

Palestinian Reuters photographer Mohammed Salem, bottom left, is carried by his colleagues after being shot by the Israeli army, while covering the Israeli prisoner release at the Erez crossing in the Gaza Strip. October 2, 2007. (Photo: APA Images)

On World Photography Day, over 40 Portuguese photographers, teachers of photography and photography students have launched a pledge not to accept professional invitations or financing from the State of Israel and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions complicit in Israels regime of occupation, colonialism and apartheid.

The pledge is the first of its kind and follows similar pledges to boycott Israel culturally by hundreds of high-profile artists in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, Switzerland and France. The photographers pledge to boycott Israel until itcomplies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians.

Among the pledge supporters are Joo Pina, winner of the 2017 Prmio Estao Imagem Viana do Castelo, Portugals only photojournalism award and Nuno Lobito, TV personality and one of the most traveled Portuguese of all times (204 countries, 193 recognized).

The pledge comes in response to the 2004 call from Palestinian artists and cultural workers, including journalists and photographers, for a cultural boycott of Israel due to its use of culture to whitewash the oppression of Palestinians.

The cultural boycott of Israel is part of the global the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which is modeled after the South African anti-apartheid boycott campaign. The Palestinian-led BDS movement has seen impressive growth into the mainstream in the past few years.

Miguel Carrio, winner of the 2012 Concelho da Bienal de Vila Franca de Xira award, urged fellow photographers to join the call:

Having witnessed first-hand the crimes Israel is committing daily against Palestinians, signing up to this initiative has become a natural step. It is fundamental to promote this effort through all means possible.

Palestinian photography artists are not exempt from the brutality of Israels occupation. Artists have been denied visas by the Israeli military establishment, preventing them from participating in conferences and performances internationally. Artists have also been detained at checkpoints, arrested, had their equipment broken, and exposed to the same violence perpetrated by the Israeli army on all Palestinians.

In 2014, Israel was considered the second most lethal country for journalists. Israel continues to step up its attacks against journalists in 2017. Last April, Israeli police fractured the ribs of AFP photographer Ahmad Gharabli and smashed two of his cameras. He was among six photographers targeted by the Israeli authorities on the same day. In May, an Israeli settler shot Majdi Mohamed, a photographer for the Associated Press, while he was covering an Israeli incursion in Nablus. Israels attacks against Palestinian and international photographers are part of a systematic policy and have been perpetrated with impunity.

Traveller-photographer Nuno Lobito said:

It is time for Israels brand of apartheid to enjoy the same treatment as South African apartheid and be target of a comprehensive international boycott until it respects human rights. Photographers can no longer be silent about the treatment of their Palestinian colleagues living under an indefensible occupation that has lasted for over half a century. Palestinians have called for solidarity through boycotts and this pledge is our practical contribution to their struggle.

Signatory Jos Soudo, a veteran Photography teacher and Historian, commented:

The history of photography is full of examples, from the 19th century to today, of photographers who gave their sight to the service of the oppressed and destitute.

For Joo Henriques, winner of the 2015 Fnac New Talents Award, to participate in this solidarity initiative for Palestine is to believe in the power of photography to provide testimony, to create conscience and to have empathy for the Other.

Support for the cultural boycott of Israel enjoys broad support internationally, among them Roger Waters, Ken Loach, Mike Leigh, Lauryn Hill, Mark Rylance, Emma Thompson, Alice Walker, Naomi Klein, Elvis Costello, Brian Eno, Jean Luc Godard and Mira Nair.

In 2011, Queer Lisboa International LGBT Festival dropped its Israel sponsorship following a BDS campaign. This year, BDS activists called on the Almada Festival to cancel a collaboration with the Israeli government and its Brand Israel whitewash campaign.

##

Full text of the pledge:

We support the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality. In response to the call from Palestinian photographers, journalists and cultural workers for a cultural boycott of Israel, we pledge to accept neither professional invitations to Israel, nor funding, from the Israeli state and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions linked to its government until Israel complies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians.

The photographers pledge to boycott Israel is work-in-progress. Portuguese photographers wishing to add their name to this initiative should write a message: [emailprotected]g

See the rest here:

Portuguese photographers launch Israel boycott pledge – Mondoweiss

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Analysis: Is Israel being utilized in the German Social Democrats’ campaign? – i24NEWS

A lot has changed in German-Israeli relations since the Social Democratic Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in front of the Warsaw Ghetto Heroes memorial in 1970. While that resonating gesture advanced the then-new ties between the two countries, nowadays SPD leaders seem to be mostly generating controversy in their dealings with Israel.

Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who already drew criticism after comparing Israel to a Apartheid regime following a visit to Hebron in 2012, knocked heads again with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after insisting to meet with highly-critical left-wing NGOs during a visit in April.

President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, also of the SPD, who followed Gabriel to Israel in May with the hope of easing tensions, was seen in Germany as contributing to the friction by laying a wreath on the tomb of Yasser Arafat in Ramallah.

Most recently it was a local SPD official from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia who triggered an uproar: On his Facebook page, the official Stefan Grnebaum called Israel supporters in Germany an organized, good networked ‘fifth column’ serving the interests of the Jewish state.

The traditional friendship of the SPD towards Israel, forged with Israel’s socialist roots in mind, has weakened with time, deems Dr. Martin Kloke, an expert on Israel and the German left. Today we have another government in Israel, more right wing, and in Germany there is a new generation, one that doesn’t care very much about the past, he explained.

Among rival parties, the latest steps by the SPD involving Israel including the indefinite postponement of the German-Israeli drone deal ] evoked allegations that the party is trying to win political capital at Israel’s expense.

The election campaign is to blame, asserted CSU politician Florian Hahn recently to i24NEWS. The SPD is openly ready to endanger our good relations with Israel, in order to make gains for themselves ahead of the election in September.

Pro-Israel lawmakers within the SPD now deny the accusations. I’m sure that within the German population and among our voters as well, there are people that would like Germany to take a tougher line against Israel, admitted Bundestag member Fritz Felgentreu, but he insists that these comments are unlikely a response to a general expectation among voters, nor is it part of an election strategy.

Gabriel’s remarks were the result of his direct and somewhat impulsive communication style and reflected his personal dislike of the Netanyahu government, argues the SPD politician, while Steinmeier’s gesture was meant more as a sign of respect towards the Palestinians and both of them underestimated the effect it would have.

The SPD is a large party; we have more than 400,000 members and some 5,000 active politicians all over Germany, maybe even more. Among them you will find people with different views on Israel, and if you simply collect the ones that are critical of Israel, you can easily create the impression of something piling up. I don’t think it is a fair portrayal of what’s going on.

Moreover, reminds Felgentreu, such comments have little potential to sway the vote of Germans of Arab descent, for one, as they view Germany’s support of Israel as solidified by the German guilt complex and rule out a fundamental change in attitude.

But Jewish voters, on the contrary, do attribute importance to such signals. For example, the fact that Martin Schulz then President of the European Parliament and now the SPD candidate for chancellor – praised the speech of Palestinian President Abbas in Brussels last year as inspiring and stayed silent in the face of his claim that Rabbis are urging Israel to poison Palestinians water, was much noticed by the German Jewry.

It made them distrust Martin Schulz, noted Felgentreu. I believe it was just a blunder, a mistake, but from my discussions with German Jews, it is clear that when you have a series of little signals like that, it can destroy confidence in the SPD’s general position. We have to be much more sensitive of the signals we broadcast and to take the sensitivities of Jewish Germans much more seriously.

The expert Kloke agrees: Politicians indeed lack an understanding of the historical and psychological complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and at first glance often oversimplify it as merely a land dispute or a David vs. Goliath-type struggle. But are they utilizing Israel in the dialog with their voters? Though unlikely, the question remains open.

There is no smoking gun on this, there is no proof. But the SPD must be very desperate if it has to use these methods to get votes, stressed Kloke, bringing as evidence the case of Jrgen Mllemann – the first and maybe the last time that a leading politician used Israel and anti-Zionism to attract voters, as he describes it.

Mllemann, a former federal minister and vice chancellor from the liberal Free Democratic Party, produced a brochure ahead of the 2002 national election, criticizing the former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon’s policies towards the Palestinians. The vice president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany at the time, Michel Friedman, that endorsed these actions, was also slammed in the flyer that was widely viewed as anti-Semitic. The controversy drove Mllemann out of the party the following year.

He definitely completely lost and the party got rid of him, continued Kloke, so I hope that the SPD is not really considering using anti-Israel sentiments, because this is not part of the Social Democrats’ tradition.

In general, he says, it seems that Israel, which once had the power to cause polarization within the German left, had lost its impact on the electorate. There is a growing understanding that Israel is not the main issue in the Middle East and that solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict alone won’t heal the region. The public opinion is disillusioned, and this makes Israel or whatever the Israeli government is saying or doing, look not as important as it did a few years ago.

I don’t remember any election in the last 20 years where the policy towards Israel was a major issue, Felgentreu affirmed, particularly because I believe fundamentally this question is settled. Anybody who wants to be taken seriously in German politics, fully embraces Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. So why argue about something that everyone agrees on? It doesn’t make sense.

Therefore, whoever might win the upcoming election the German policy towards Israel will largely remain the same, both Kloke and Felgentreu agree. Berlin will continue to scold Israel for its settlement policy, will counter the BDS movement in Europe at least to some extent, and will unlikely significantly increase its involvement in the stalled peace process.

Naturally I think that Chancellor Schulz would be a better solution than Chancellor Merkel in many areas, and probably also in affairs with Israel, stated the politician. But on the really important issues of foreign policy, there is not much difference between the CDU and the SPD. The German support for Israel is not in dispute.

Read more from the original source:

Analysis: Is Israel being utilized in the German Social Democrats’ campaign? – i24NEWS

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

SF State asks court to dismiss suit accusing it of allowing anti-Semitism – SFGate

Photo: Loren Elliott, The Chronicle

File photo of Holloway Avenue by the San Francisco State University administration building in San Francisco, California.

File photo of Holloway Avenue by the San Francisco State University administration building in San Francisco, California.

SF State asks court to dismiss suit accusing it of allowing anti-Semitism

Saying they have no power to censor campus speech, officials at San Francisco State University asked a federal judge Monday to dismiss a suit by current and former Jewish students accusing the school of fostering anti-Semitism.

Lawyers for the school and the California State University Board of Trustees denied that the incidents described in the suit disruption of a talk by the mayor of Jerusalem, exclusion of the Jewish group Hillel from a campus fair, and several past provocations including the 1994 defacement of a mural showing stars of David had been fostered or tolerated by SFSU officials or had interfered with anyones freedom of religion.

But even if religious liberties had been burdened, the lawyers said, the source of that burden would be the actions of other students and groups at the university, who were also exercising core First Amendment rights that the university could not curtail.

They noted that another judge threw out a similar suit against UC Berkeley in 2011.

U.S. District Judge William Orrick III will decide whether to let the suit proceed.

Filed in June by present and past students and several local residents, the suit alleged that SFSU has fostered and sanctioned anti-Semitism from the highest levels and affirmed the actions of hostile, aggressive and disruptive students to regularly violate the rights of Jewish students.

The suit focused on an April 2016 appearance by Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat. Six minutes into his remarks, about 20 students stood and started shouting, Free Palestine, Israel is an apartheid state and other chants, according to a report commissioned by the university.

The protesters soon began using a microphone and prevented listeners from hearing most of Barkats speech, said the report, by an outside law firm. It concluded the protest had been disruptive and violated school policies but posed no physical threat to Barkat or others.

But the lawsuit said the protesters had threatened violence, that Jewish students felt frightened, and that school officials had contributed to the hateful atmosphere by instructing campus police to stand down, and later by letting the demonstrators off with a warning. The suit also accused officials of bias for moving Barkats speech to an off-campus location.

In Mondays filing, however, the university said it had relocated Barkats speech because of concerns about student safety, not religion. And university lawyers said the protesters were engaged in political speech and expressive conduct core First Amendment-protected rights.

The lawyers also said Hillel had been excluded from a campus Know Your Rights fair in February because the group had missed a registration deadline. The Jewish students lawsuit contended the deadline was fabricated.

We stand by our claims, which outline a discriminatory environment unlawfully targeting Jewish students, attorney Brooke Goldstein of the Lawfare Project, a pro-Israel nonprofit representing the plaintiffs, said Monday.

SFSU officials also cited a 2011 ruling by another federal judge dismissing a lawsuit by two Jewish students that accused UC Berkeley of turning a blind eye to alleged intimidation by Arab students and encouraging campus anti-Semitism.

Even if the claims in that lawsuit were proved, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg said, the conduct mainly involved pure political speech that was constitutionally protected.

Seeborg, however, allowed the Berkeley students to refile their suit with narrower and more specific claims. Their lawyer, Joel Siegal, said Monday that the case was ultimately settled with bans on some types of intimidating conduct by protesters.

Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: begelko@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @egelko

Go here to see the original:

SF State asks court to dismiss suit accusing it of allowing anti-Semitism – SFGate

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Portuguese Photographers Pledge BDS on Israeli Government – International Middle East Media Center

Over 40 Portuguese photographers, teachers of photography and photography students pledged on Saturday, which marked World Photography Day, not to accept professional invitations or financing from Israel, and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions complicit in Israels regime of occupation, colonialism and apartheid, according to the official website of the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

According to the statement from the BDS movement, the pledge was the first of its kind, as the photographers pledged to boycott Israel until it complies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians.

Among the pledge supporters were Jo o Pina, winner of the 2017 Pr mio Esta o Imagem Viana do Castelo, Portugals only photojournalism award, TV personality and travel photographerNuno Lobito, Miguel Carri o, winner of the 2012 Concelho da Bienal de Vila Franca de Xira award, Jos Soudo, a veteran Photography teacher and Historian, and Jo o Henriques, winner of the 2015 Fnac New Talents Award.

According to Maan News Agency, the statement quoted Carri o as saying: Having witnessed first-hand the crimes Israel is committing daily against Palestinians, signing up to this initiative has become a natural step. It is fundamental to promote this effort through all means possible.

It is time for Israels brand of apartheid to enjoy the same treatment as South African apartheid and be target of a comprehensive international boycott until it respects human rights, the statement quoted Lobita as saying.

Photographers can no longer be silent about the treatment of their Palestinian colleagues living under an indefensible occupation that has lasted for over half a century. Palestinians have called for solidarity through boycotts and this pledge is our practical contribution to their struggle.

The statement noted the struggles of Palestinian photographers and journalists under the Israeli occupation, highlighted that artists have been denied visas by the Israeli military establishment, preventing them from participating in conferences and performances internationally, in addition to being detained at checkpoints, arrested, having their equipment broken, and being exposed to the same violence perpetrated by the Israeli army on all Palestinians.

The BDS movement was founded in 2005 by a swath of Palestinian civil society as a peaceful movement to restore Palestinian rights in accordance with international law through strategies of boycotting Israeli products and cultural institutions, divesting from companies complicit in violations against Palestinians, and implementing state sanctions against the Israeli government.

BDS activists target companies that act in compliance with Israels illegal occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and encourage supporters to avoid buying Israeli products in order to put pressure on the Israeli government to end the half-century occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem the decade-long Israeli siege on the Gaza Strip.

As support for the movement has grown, the Israeli government has introduced anti-BDS policies, including passing a law in March banning foreigners who have openly expressed support in BDS from entering the country.

Search IMEMC: boycott

Original post:

Portuguese Photographers Pledge BDS on Israeli Government – International Middle East Media Center

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Antisemitism On The Left – Breaking Israel News

I was shocked, but not surprised, to see the Washington Post feature an op-ed this weekend (August 19) stating that the left has eschewed political violence. Author Yoav Fromer admits that there is some violence on the left, but for decades it hasnt compared to the methodical, organized and strategic violence and incitement of the right. What about rioting in Ferguson, MO, Portland, OR, Baltimore, MD and annually in Devos, Switzerland, or the attempt to murder the Republican congressional baseball team, to name just a few recent instances? There is extreme violence on the fringes of the left and the right. Excusing the left wing component, as the media icons do on a regular basis, only exacerbates the political divisions which are plaguing Western democracies.

We know about right wing antisemitism, which we witnessed in Charlottesville. But antisemitism is also prevalent on the left. It hurts to see Jews supporting the BDS movement (boycott, delegitimize, sanction Israel); the Black Lives Matter movement (Israel is the apartheid state), the LGBTQ movement (pro-Palestine and anti-Zionist), and the feminist movement (ditto), ignoring the bias against Jews and Israel. The great majority of Jews are liberal; they must wake up to the fact that movements such as those above are intolerant, not liberal.

If you are willing to toe the antisemitic, anti-Zionist line, youre ok to join these movements. But if you have pride in the fact that you are a Jew, or are a supporter of Israel, its past time to strongly express your disgust and to withdraw your support from organizations which are antisemitic and anti-Zionist.

Below are some excerpts from recent articles by a variety of non-doctrinaire writers, documenting the fallout from some of the above-mentioned movements.

Bari Weiss, New York Times For progressive American Jews, intersectionality [Intersectionality is the idea that all oppressed peoples and categories of people share a position, and by virtue of that fact are potential allies in the struggle against their oppressors] forces a choice: Which side of your identity do you keep, and which side do you discard and revile? Do you side with the oppressed or with the oppressor?

That kind of choice would have been familiar to previous generations of left-wing Jews, particularly those in Europe, who felt the tug between their ethnic heritage and their internationalist ideological sympathies. But this is the United States. Here, progressives are supposed to be comfortable with the idea of hyphenated identities and overlapping ethnic, sexual and political affinities. Since when did a politics that celebrates choice and choices devolve into a requirement of being forced to choose?

Jews on the left, particularly in recent years, have attempted to square this growing discomfort by becoming more anti-Israel. But if history has taught the Jews anything its that this kind of contortion never ends well. https://www.nytimes.com

Alan Dershowitz, Professor Emeritus Harvard Law School Whats new is the anti-Semitism from the right has become emboldened and now almost catching up with the anti-Semitism on the hard left which has been in existence for 20 years, he said. I love the concept of Black Lives Matter, but they are an anti-Semitic group. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video

Jennifer Ann Moses, USA Today Not ISIL (thousands of Yazidis murdered).Not North Korea (where untold millions, including children, have been killed by famine, imprisonment in slave camps, and torture.)Not Syria, where Bashar Assads forces continue to kill Syrian citizensby thehundreds of thousands.Nope:its Israel that some misguided folks at Black Lives Matter have singled out for accusations of genocide, even though Israel applies capital punishment only for crimes against humanity, and in practice, Israel hasnt sought the death penalty for decades.In other words, Israel, alone among the nations in its neighborhood, has never practiced state-sponsored bloodshed.

when it comes to hating Jews, normative reality has nothing to do with it.The only thing that matters is the narrative of hatred. https://www.usatoday.com/

Jonathan S. Tobin, Jewish Press Unfortunately, many decent liberals have turned a blind eye to left-wing anti-Zionist agitation that is indistinguishable from anti-Semitism. Those who say they wish to deny Jews statehood, the right of self-defense, or the ability to live in peace in their homeland are practicing discrimination against Jews. This is the definition of anti-Semitism. And it is on the left, not the right, where support for such hatred, whether in the form of backing for the BDS movement or cultural boycotts, is growing.

It isnt alt-right Internet trolls who are orchestrating anti-Jewish protests like those of Linda Sarsour orefforts to boycott Israeli plays at Lincoln Center, where the appearance of even the work of a critic of Israel like David Grossman was enough to generate protest from mainstream artists.

Nor is it Trump who is responsible for turning universities into places where Jewish students no longer feel safe expressing their Jewish identity.

But unfortunately, all too many liberals would still rather believe Trump, their main political foe is the real reason anti-Semitism is growing. http://www.jewishpress.com/

Hannah Dreyfus, Jewish Week Jewish feminists of all stripes who are also Israel supporters, find themselves increasingly caught in the crosshairs of a culture war that seeks to isolate them both on campus and far beyond the quad. The bind they are in is a delicate one: jettison the progressive movement altogether, based on its harsh Israel positions, and not have a seat at the table, or agree to disagree on Israel but preserve a much-needed voice in the debate on a whole range of issues.

The International Womens Strike [March 8, 2017], which called for the decolonization of Palestine, solicited the participation of Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a Palestinian woman convicted and sentenced by an Israeli military court in 1970 to life in prison for two bombing attacks. [She was released in a prisoner exchange after just 10 years in prison.]

Emily Shire, a journalist and editor living in New York who covers feminism and politics, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times about her conflicted Zionist and feminist identities. The article headlined Does Feminism Have Room for Zionists? was prompted by the controversial platform of the Womens Strike and the involvement of Odeh.

Speaking to The Jewish Week the day after her piece was published, Shire said the outrage and negative comments she received in response to the article were unlike anything Ive ever experienced before. I received my first-ever comment from someone wishing I would die. http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/

Its a reality that the extreme right and the extreme left are closer to each other than either is to the center. Hatred of Jews and Israel is a uniting factor. Whether from the left or the right, antisemites seem to get away with it. Theres nothing more to say.

Read more here:

Antisemitism On The Left – Breaking Israel News

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

President Trump: ‘We’ll Be Talking About Gun Laws’

President Trump reacted on Tuesday to the Las Vegas attack by saying, “We’ll be talking about gun laws as time goes by.”

Fair Usage Law

October 3, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

A new threat to Israel’s apartheid state: Bedouin toddlers – Arab News

As much of the world engages with a variety of security threats ranging from car rammings, bombings and stabbings to neo-Nazi white supremacist marches, the Israeli army has been dealing with its own security priorities too. This supposed democratic bastion of western civilization does indeed have many legitimate security threats but one does have to wonder how a small Portakabin serving as a Bedouin kindergarten in the West Bank threatened the might of the Israeli army. A kindergarten. Who was it used by? Palestinian refugee children. This was not some military training center or weapons factory but a ramshackle education establishment for toddlers serving the small community of Jabal Al Baba, 4km to the east of Jerusalem. It warranted an early morning visit of Israeli forces that wiped the site clean, taking all the school equipment as well. Nothing was left at all. If you visit this small community of 56 families you see the residue of previous demolitions, even of the threatening animal pens. All in all, their community head tells me, 48 structures have been demolished in the past three years. Originally there were forced out of the Negev desert in Israel in 1950. Intriguingly this small plot of land is part owned by the Vatican, hence the name Jabal Al Baba or Popes mountain. It was in fact a gift from King Hussein of Jordan to the then Pope Paul VI during his 1964 visit. The week before this round of demolitions, Israeli soldiers had been removing threatening solar panels that supplied the kindergarten and elementary school of the neighboring community of Abu Nuwar. The existing classroom is now too hot even to be used and they make use of the local barbershop for elementary school classes. In February 2016, trailers donated by the French government for use as a school were demolished. Back in 2014, I had visited another Bedouin community close by that had had its newly installed swings confiscated because they constituted an illegal construction. An incredible 56 Palestinian schools in Area C communities in the West Bank have Israeli demolition orders outstanding against them. The Israeli excuse is that these buildings do not have permits and are illegal. Who issues, or rather does not issue permits? The Israeli military authorities. Who in the West Bank build illegally, often without permits, without threat of demolition and typically with official assistance? Israeli settlers. The demolition of a small kindergarten on prime real estate east of Jerusalem is part of a larger settlement project that will make any Palestinian state unviable. Chris Doyle

Fair Usage Law

August 23, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

MKs ‘snubbed’ on South Africa trip as govt officials refuse meetings – The Jerusalem Post

A delegation of five MKs visited South Africa recently in a bid to meet with government officials, improve ties with the country and connect with the 70,000-strong Jewish community. The delegation led by the Zionist Unions Nachman Shai also included Amir Ohana and Nurit Koren from the Likud, and Zouheir Bahloul and Michal Biran from the Zionist Union. However, the MKs were snubbed in Cape Town by the countrys Parliament, where the ruling African National Congress holds the majority. A large contingent of South African parliamentarians openly rejected the delegations visit. Shai, speaking with The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday, said it was wrong that the South African parliamentarians refused to meet with the delegation and made an issue out of it. We asked to see them and they refused…Israel-South Africa relations are not hateful there is no animosity. We have a long history with South Africa. Israels security and military relations with the Apartheid government is not a secret although Israel never supported Apartheid but for the ANC and many South Africans, it [this relationship] is not forgotten, he said. Since the beginning of the new government [under Nelson Mandela in 1994], Israel has had some difficulties connecting with South Africa BDS there is very strong the [2001 anti-Israel] Durban conference and the very fact that they [Parliament] put out a press release that they dont want to meet with us, is wrong, Shai continued. Shai said the August 14-22 visit could have been a turning point in relations between the countries as Israel has much to offer South Africa in terms of technology, human resources, health and education. I believe we should talk about the future the past will not get us anywhere. We should have been received by the government and our fellow [South African] parliamentary colleagues it could have worked very well, Shai told the Post. Although shunned by Parliament, Shai and the delegation still met with several senior ANC members including former-interim president Kgalema Motlanthe and Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma a presidential candidate, as well as leaders of the opposition parties and the mayor of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba. Asked about the discussion with Dlamini- Zuma, Shai said she listened more than she spoke, which was good because Israel doesnt always have access to South Africa. We spoke about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli-South Africa relations, he said. The delegation members, who returned home on Tuesday, said they were not deterred from continuing to improve ties between the countries and to connect with South Africas warm and welcoming Jewish community. We wanted to talk to them [Jewish community] and hear from them, and they are very eager to hear about whats going on in Israel, Shai said. For Shai, such meetings were the highlight of the trip. We were warmly received by the Johannesburg and Cape Town [Jewish] communities. I was impressed by the [Jewish] education system how Judaism and Israel are integrated together… I will remember for the rest of my life the conversations and questions we had with the students from Herzlia and King David schools, he said. Being able to see South Africa and the many different aspects of the country, the Jewish community and the people was fascinating it was a very successful trip, he said. South Africas community is quite small but it has strong foundations and is strongly Zionist… Just to visit the Jewish community here without political meetings is extremely important sometimes home is very far away and sometimes its close and Israel is the Jewish peoples home the point of these visits is to see what way Israel can help and what way Israel can give to Jewish communities, Shai explained. Asked if there would be more MK visits to South Africa, Shai said he could not see it happening soon as it takes a lot of effort to organize. I hope maybe in one or two years this will happen again, maybe if my fellow colleagues here [in Israel], hear our stories, they will want to go as well, he concluded. The previous official visit by a delegation of MKs to visit South Africa was in 2004, when a group from the Likud met with then-president Thabo Mbeki. He welcomed them as friends a fairly different way from how they were received by the countrys ruling party this time around. The 2004 visit was the first time the Likud held talks with the South African government about Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Israeli Embassy in South Africa said the recent delegation was the result of cooperation between the Knesset, the Foreign Ministry and the Jewish Agency. They have also had positive engagements with the key figures of the Christian and business communities, the embassy said. The delegation proves that dialogue is key in increasing understanding of the challenges and opportunities between our great nations, Ambassador Lior Keinan said. The delegation reiterated its commitment to sharing Israels expertise in agriculture, water and hi-tech. The embassy continues to explore a plethora of avenues for cooperation between Israel and South Africa, and this delegation is a great step toward that goal, it said. Share on facebook

Fair Usage Law

August 23, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

New York Times distorts reality of Israel’s apartheid walls – Mintpress News (blog)

Isabel Kershner,writing inThe New York Times, claims the aboveground fences and sections of concrete wall [that] run along and through parts of the West Bank are a legacy of Palestinian suicide bombings during the second intifada. But she fails to note many observers contention that due to the fact85 percentof the barrier runsinsidethe occupied West Bank, Israels construction of it appears to be far more of aland grabthan anything to do with security.

Fair Usage Law

August 22, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Portuguese photographers launch Israel boycott pledge – Mondoweiss

Palestinian Reuters photographer Mohammed Salem, bottom left, is carried by his colleagues after being shot by the Israeli army, while covering the Israeli prisoner release at the Erez crossing in the Gaza Strip. October 2, 2007. (Photo: APA Images) On World Photography Day, over 40 Portuguese photographers, teachers of photography and photography students have launched a pledge not to accept professional invitations or financing from the State of Israel and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions complicit in Israels regime of occupation, colonialism and apartheid. The pledge is the first of its kind and follows similar pledges to boycott Israel culturally by hundreds of high-profile artists in the US, UK, South Africa, Canada, Switzerland and France. The photographers pledge to boycott Israel until itcomplies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians. Among the pledge supporters are Joo Pina, winner of the 2017 Prmio Estao Imagem Viana do Castelo, Portugals only photojournalism award and Nuno Lobito, TV personality and one of the most traveled Portuguese of all times (204 countries, 193 recognized). The pledge comes in response to the 2004 call from Palestinian artists and cultural workers, including journalists and photographers, for a cultural boycott of Israel due to its use of culture to whitewash the oppression of Palestinians. The cultural boycott of Israel is part of the global the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which is modeled after the South African anti-apartheid boycott campaign. The Palestinian-led BDS movement has seen impressive growth into the mainstream in the past few years. Miguel Carrio, winner of the 2012 Concelho da Bienal de Vila Franca de Xira award, urged fellow photographers to join the call: Having witnessed first-hand the crimes Israel is committing daily against Palestinians, signing up to this initiative has become a natural step. It is fundamental to promote this effort through all means possible. Palestinian photography artists are not exempt from the brutality of Israels occupation. Artists have been denied visas by the Israeli military establishment, preventing them from participating in conferences and performances internationally. Artists have also been detained at checkpoints, arrested, had their equipment broken, and exposed to the same violence perpetrated by the Israeli army on all Palestinians. In 2014, Israel was considered the second most lethal country for journalists. Israel continues to step up its attacks against journalists in 2017. Last April, Israeli police fractured the ribs of AFP photographer Ahmad Gharabli and smashed two of his cameras. He was among six photographers targeted by the Israeli authorities on the same day. In May, an Israeli settler shot Majdi Mohamed, a photographer for the Associated Press, while he was covering an Israeli incursion in Nablus. Israels attacks against Palestinian and international photographers are part of a systematic policy and have been perpetrated with impunity. Traveller-photographer Nuno Lobito said: It is time for Israels brand of apartheid to enjoy the same treatment as South African apartheid and be target of a comprehensive international boycott until it respects human rights. Photographers can no longer be silent about the treatment of their Palestinian colleagues living under an indefensible occupation that has lasted for over half a century. Palestinians have called for solidarity through boycotts and this pledge is our practical contribution to their struggle. Signatory Jos Soudo, a veteran Photography teacher and Historian, commented: The history of photography is full of examples, from the 19th century to today, of photographers who gave their sight to the service of the oppressed and destitute. For Joo Henriques, winner of the 2015 Fnac New Talents Award, to participate in this solidarity initiative for Palestine is to believe in the power of photography to provide testimony, to create conscience and to have empathy for the Other. Support for the cultural boycott of Israel enjoys broad support internationally, among them Roger Waters, Ken Loach, Mike Leigh, Lauryn Hill, Mark Rylance, Emma Thompson, Alice Walker, Naomi Klein, Elvis Costello, Brian Eno, Jean Luc Godard and Mira Nair. In 2011, Queer Lisboa International LGBT Festival dropped its Israel sponsorship following a BDS campaign. This year, BDS activists called on the Almada Festival to cancel a collaboration with the Israeli government and its Brand Israel whitewash campaign. ## Full text of the pledge: We support the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality. In response to the call from Palestinian photographers, journalists and cultural workers for a cultural boycott of Israel, we pledge to accept neither professional invitations to Israel, nor funding, from the Israeli state and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions linked to its government until Israel complies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians. The photographers pledge to boycott Israel is work-in-progress. Portuguese photographers wishing to add their name to this initiative should write a message: [emailprotected]g

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Analysis: Is Israel being utilized in the German Social Democrats’ campaign? – i24NEWS

A lot has changed in German-Israeli relations since the Social Democratic Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in front of the Warsaw Ghetto Heroes memorial in 1970. While that resonating gesture advanced the then-new ties between the two countries, nowadays SPD leaders seem to be mostly generating controversy in their dealings with Israel. Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who already drew criticism after comparing Israel to a Apartheid regime following a visit to Hebron in 2012, knocked heads again with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after insisting to meet with highly-critical left-wing NGOs during a visit in April. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, also of the SPD, who followed Gabriel to Israel in May with the hope of easing tensions, was seen in Germany as contributing to the friction by laying a wreath on the tomb of Yasser Arafat in Ramallah. Most recently it was a local SPD official from the state of North Rhine-Westphalia who triggered an uproar: On his Facebook page, the official Stefan Grnebaum called Israel supporters in Germany an organized, good networked ‘fifth column’ serving the interests of the Jewish state. The traditional friendship of the SPD towards Israel, forged with Israel’s socialist roots in mind, has weakened with time, deems Dr. Martin Kloke, an expert on Israel and the German left. Today we have another government in Israel, more right wing, and in Germany there is a new generation, one that doesn’t care very much about the past, he explained. Among rival parties, the latest steps by the SPD involving Israel including the indefinite postponement of the German-Israeli drone deal ] evoked allegations that the party is trying to win political capital at Israel’s expense. The election campaign is to blame, asserted CSU politician Florian Hahn recently to i24NEWS. The SPD is openly ready to endanger our good relations with Israel, in order to make gains for themselves ahead of the election in September. Pro-Israel lawmakers within the SPD now deny the accusations. I’m sure that within the German population and among our voters as well, there are people that would like Germany to take a tougher line against Israel, admitted Bundestag member Fritz Felgentreu, but he insists that these comments are unlikely a response to a general expectation among voters, nor is it part of an election strategy. Gabriel’s remarks were the result of his direct and somewhat impulsive communication style and reflected his personal dislike of the Netanyahu government, argues the SPD politician, while Steinmeier’s gesture was meant more as a sign of respect towards the Palestinians and both of them underestimated the effect it would have. The SPD is a large party; we have more than 400,000 members and some 5,000 active politicians all over Germany, maybe even more. Among them you will find people with different views on Israel, and if you simply collect the ones that are critical of Israel, you can easily create the impression of something piling up. I don’t think it is a fair portrayal of what’s going on. Moreover, reminds Felgentreu, such comments have little potential to sway the vote of Germans of Arab descent, for one, as they view Germany’s support of Israel as solidified by the German guilt complex and rule out a fundamental change in attitude. But Jewish voters, on the contrary, do attribute importance to such signals. For example, the fact that Martin Schulz then President of the European Parliament and now the SPD candidate for chancellor – praised the speech of Palestinian President Abbas in Brussels last year as inspiring and stayed silent in the face of his claim that Rabbis are urging Israel to poison Palestinians water, was much noticed by the German Jewry. It made them distrust Martin Schulz, noted Felgentreu. I believe it was just a blunder, a mistake, but from my discussions with German Jews, it is clear that when you have a series of little signals like that, it can destroy confidence in the SPD’s general position. We have to be much more sensitive of the signals we broadcast and to take the sensitivities of Jewish Germans much more seriously. The expert Kloke agrees: Politicians indeed lack an understanding of the historical and psychological complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and at first glance often oversimplify it as merely a land dispute or a David vs. Goliath-type struggle. But are they utilizing Israel in the dialog with their voters? Though unlikely, the question remains open. There is no smoking gun on this, there is no proof. But the SPD must be very desperate if it has to use these methods to get votes, stressed Kloke, bringing as evidence the case of Jrgen Mllemann – the first and maybe the last time that a leading politician used Israel and anti-Zionism to attract voters, as he describes it. Mllemann, a former federal minister and vice chancellor from the liberal Free Democratic Party, produced a brochure ahead of the 2002 national election, criticizing the former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon’s policies towards the Palestinians. The vice president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany at the time, Michel Friedman, that endorsed these actions, was also slammed in the flyer that was widely viewed as anti-Semitic. The controversy drove Mllemann out of the party the following year. He definitely completely lost and the party got rid of him, continued Kloke, so I hope that the SPD is not really considering using anti-Israel sentiments, because this is not part of the Social Democrats’ tradition. In general, he says, it seems that Israel, which once had the power to cause polarization within the German left, had lost its impact on the electorate. There is a growing understanding that Israel is not the main issue in the Middle East and that solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict alone won’t heal the region. The public opinion is disillusioned, and this makes Israel or whatever the Israeli government is saying or doing, look not as important as it did a few years ago. I don’t remember any election in the last 20 years where the policy towards Israel was a major issue, Felgentreu affirmed, particularly because I believe fundamentally this question is settled. Anybody who wants to be taken seriously in German politics, fully embraces Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. So why argue about something that everyone agrees on? It doesn’t make sense. Therefore, whoever might win the upcoming election the German policy towards Israel will largely remain the same, both Kloke and Felgentreu agree. Berlin will continue to scold Israel for its settlement policy, will counter the BDS movement in Europe at least to some extent, and will unlikely significantly increase its involvement in the stalled peace process. Naturally I think that Chancellor Schulz would be a better solution than Chancellor Merkel in many areas, and probably also in affairs with Israel, stated the politician. But on the really important issues of foreign policy, there is not much difference between the CDU and the SPD. The German support for Israel is not in dispute.

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

SF State asks court to dismiss suit accusing it of allowing anti-Semitism – SFGate

Photo: Loren Elliott, The Chronicle File photo of Holloway Avenue by the San Francisco State University administration building in San Francisco, California. File photo of Holloway Avenue by the San Francisco State University administration building in San Francisco, California. SF State asks court to dismiss suit accusing it of allowing anti-Semitism Saying they have no power to censor campus speech, officials at San Francisco State University asked a federal judge Monday to dismiss a suit by current and former Jewish students accusing the school of fostering anti-Semitism. Lawyers for the school and the California State University Board of Trustees denied that the incidents described in the suit disruption of a talk by the mayor of Jerusalem, exclusion of the Jewish group Hillel from a campus fair, and several past provocations including the 1994 defacement of a mural showing stars of David had been fostered or tolerated by SFSU officials or had interfered with anyones freedom of religion. But even if religious liberties had been burdened, the lawyers said, the source of that burden would be the actions of other students and groups at the university, who were also exercising core First Amendment rights that the university could not curtail. They noted that another judge threw out a similar suit against UC Berkeley in 2011. U.S. District Judge William Orrick III will decide whether to let the suit proceed. Filed in June by present and past students and several local residents, the suit alleged that SFSU has fostered and sanctioned anti-Semitism from the highest levels and affirmed the actions of hostile, aggressive and disruptive students to regularly violate the rights of Jewish students. The suit focused on an April 2016 appearance by Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat. Six minutes into his remarks, about 20 students stood and started shouting, Free Palestine, Israel is an apartheid state and other chants, according to a report commissioned by the university. The protesters soon began using a microphone and prevented listeners from hearing most of Barkats speech, said the report, by an outside law firm. It concluded the protest had been disruptive and violated school policies but posed no physical threat to Barkat or others. But the lawsuit said the protesters had threatened violence, that Jewish students felt frightened, and that school officials had contributed to the hateful atmosphere by instructing campus police to stand down, and later by letting the demonstrators off with a warning. The suit also accused officials of bias for moving Barkats speech to an off-campus location. In Mondays filing, however, the university said it had relocated Barkats speech because of concerns about student safety, not religion. And university lawyers said the protesters were engaged in political speech and expressive conduct core First Amendment-protected rights. The lawyers also said Hillel had been excluded from a campus Know Your Rights fair in February because the group had missed a registration deadline. The Jewish students lawsuit contended the deadline was fabricated. We stand by our claims, which outline a discriminatory environment unlawfully targeting Jewish students, attorney Brooke Goldstein of the Lawfare Project, a pro-Israel nonprofit representing the plaintiffs, said Monday. SFSU officials also cited a 2011 ruling by another federal judge dismissing a lawsuit by two Jewish students that accused UC Berkeley of turning a blind eye to alleged intimidation by Arab students and encouraging campus anti-Semitism. Even if the claims in that lawsuit were proved, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg said, the conduct mainly involved pure political speech that was constitutionally protected. Seeborg, however, allowed the Berkeley students to refile their suit with narrower and more specific claims. Their lawyer, Joel Siegal, said Monday that the case was ultimately settled with bans on some types of intimidating conduct by protesters. Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: begelko@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @egelko

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Portuguese Photographers Pledge BDS on Israeli Government – International Middle East Media Center

Over 40 Portuguese photographers, teachers of photography and photography students pledged on Saturday, which marked World Photography Day, not to accept professional invitations or financing from Israel, and to refuse to collaborate with Israeli cultural institutions complicit in Israels regime of occupation, colonialism and apartheid, according to the official website of the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. According to the statement from the BDS movement, the pledge was the first of its kind, as the photographers pledged to boycott Israel until it complies with international law and respects the human rights of Palestinians. Among the pledge supporters were Jo o Pina, winner of the 2017 Pr mio Esta o Imagem Viana do Castelo, Portugals only photojournalism award, TV personality and travel photographerNuno Lobito, Miguel Carri o, winner of the 2012 Concelho da Bienal de Vila Franca de Xira award, Jos Soudo, a veteran Photography teacher and Historian, and Jo o Henriques, winner of the 2015 Fnac New Talents Award. According to Maan News Agency, the statement quoted Carri o as saying: Having witnessed first-hand the crimes Israel is committing daily against Palestinians, signing up to this initiative has become a natural step. It is fundamental to promote this effort through all means possible. It is time for Israels brand of apartheid to enjoy the same treatment as South African apartheid and be target of a comprehensive international boycott until it respects human rights, the statement quoted Lobita as saying. Photographers can no longer be silent about the treatment of their Palestinian colleagues living under an indefensible occupation that has lasted for over half a century. Palestinians have called for solidarity through boycotts and this pledge is our practical contribution to their struggle. The statement noted the struggles of Palestinian photographers and journalists under the Israeli occupation, highlighted that artists have been denied visas by the Israeli military establishment, preventing them from participating in conferences and performances internationally, in addition to being detained at checkpoints, arrested, having their equipment broken, and being exposed to the same violence perpetrated by the Israeli army on all Palestinians. The BDS movement was founded in 2005 by a swath of Palestinian civil society as a peaceful movement to restore Palestinian rights in accordance with international law through strategies of boycotting Israeli products and cultural institutions, divesting from companies complicit in violations against Palestinians, and implementing state sanctions against the Israeli government. BDS activists target companies that act in compliance with Israels illegal occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and encourage supporters to avoid buying Israeli products in order to put pressure on the Israeli government to end the half-century occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem the decade-long Israeli siege on the Gaza Strip. As support for the movement has grown, the Israeli government has introduced anti-BDS policies, including passing a law in March banning foreigners who have openly expressed support in BDS from entering the country. Search IMEMC: boycott

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed

Antisemitism On The Left – Breaking Israel News

I was shocked, but not surprised, to see the Washington Post feature an op-ed this weekend (August 19) stating that the left has eschewed political violence. Author Yoav Fromer admits that there is some violence on the left, but for decades it hasnt compared to the methodical, organized and strategic violence and incitement of the right. What about rioting in Ferguson, MO, Portland, OR, Baltimore, MD and annually in Devos, Switzerland, or the attempt to murder the Republican congressional baseball team, to name just a few recent instances? There is extreme violence on the fringes of the left and the right. Excusing the left wing component, as the media icons do on a regular basis, only exacerbates the political divisions which are plaguing Western democracies. We know about right wing antisemitism, which we witnessed in Charlottesville. But antisemitism is also prevalent on the left. It hurts to see Jews supporting the BDS movement (boycott, delegitimize, sanction Israel); the Black Lives Matter movement (Israel is the apartheid state), the LGBTQ movement (pro-Palestine and anti-Zionist), and the feminist movement (ditto), ignoring the bias against Jews and Israel. The great majority of Jews are liberal; they must wake up to the fact that movements such as those above are intolerant, not liberal. If you are willing to toe the antisemitic, anti-Zionist line, youre ok to join these movements. But if you have pride in the fact that you are a Jew, or are a supporter of Israel, its past time to strongly express your disgust and to withdraw your support from organizations which are antisemitic and anti-Zionist. Below are some excerpts from recent articles by a variety of non-doctrinaire writers, documenting the fallout from some of the above-mentioned movements. Bari Weiss, New York Times For progressive American Jews, intersectionality [Intersectionality is the idea that all oppressed peoples and categories of people share a position, and by virtue of that fact are potential allies in the struggle against their oppressors] forces a choice: Which side of your identity do you keep, and which side do you discard and revile? Do you side with the oppressed or with the oppressor? That kind of choice would have been familiar to previous generations of left-wing Jews, particularly those in Europe, who felt the tug between their ethnic heritage and their internationalist ideological sympathies. But this is the United States. Here, progressives are supposed to be comfortable with the idea of hyphenated identities and overlapping ethnic, sexual and political affinities. Since when did a politics that celebrates choice and choices devolve into a requirement of being forced to choose? Jews on the left, particularly in recent years, have attempted to square this growing discomfort by becoming more anti-Israel. But if history has taught the Jews anything its that this kind of contortion never ends well. https://www.nytimes.com Alan Dershowitz, Professor Emeritus Harvard Law School Whats new is the anti-Semitism from the right has become emboldened and now almost catching up with the anti-Semitism on the hard left which has been in existence for 20 years, he said. I love the concept of Black Lives Matter, but they are an anti-Semitic group. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video Jennifer Ann Moses, USA Today Not ISIL (thousands of Yazidis murdered).Not North Korea (where untold millions, including children, have been killed by famine, imprisonment in slave camps, and torture.)Not Syria, where Bashar Assads forces continue to kill Syrian citizensby thehundreds of thousands.Nope:its Israel that some misguided folks at Black Lives Matter have singled out for accusations of genocide, even though Israel applies capital punishment only for crimes against humanity, and in practice, Israel hasnt sought the death penalty for decades.In other words, Israel, alone among the nations in its neighborhood, has never practiced state-sponsored bloodshed. when it comes to hating Jews, normative reality has nothing to do with it.The only thing that matters is the narrative of hatred. https://www.usatoday.com/ Jonathan S. Tobin, Jewish Press Unfortunately, many decent liberals have turned a blind eye to left-wing anti-Zionist agitation that is indistinguishable from anti-Semitism. Those who say they wish to deny Jews statehood, the right of self-defense, or the ability to live in peace in their homeland are practicing discrimination against Jews. This is the definition of anti-Semitism. And it is on the left, not the right, where support for such hatred, whether in the form of backing for the BDS movement or cultural boycotts, is growing. It isnt alt-right Internet trolls who are orchestrating anti-Jewish protests like those of Linda Sarsour orefforts to boycott Israeli plays at Lincoln Center, where the appearance of even the work of a critic of Israel like David Grossman was enough to generate protest from mainstream artists. Nor is it Trump who is responsible for turning universities into places where Jewish students no longer feel safe expressing their Jewish identity. But unfortunately, all too many liberals would still rather believe Trump, their main political foe is the real reason anti-Semitism is growing. http://www.jewishpress.com/ Hannah Dreyfus, Jewish Week Jewish feminists of all stripes who are also Israel supporters, find themselves increasingly caught in the crosshairs of a culture war that seeks to isolate them both on campus and far beyond the quad. The bind they are in is a delicate one: jettison the progressive movement altogether, based on its harsh Israel positions, and not have a seat at the table, or agree to disagree on Israel but preserve a much-needed voice in the debate on a whole range of issues. The International Womens Strike [March 8, 2017], which called for the decolonization of Palestine, solicited the participation of Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a Palestinian woman convicted and sentenced by an Israeli military court in 1970 to life in prison for two bombing attacks. [She was released in a prisoner exchange after just 10 years in prison.] Emily Shire, a journalist and editor living in New York who covers feminism and politics, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times about her conflicted Zionist and feminist identities. The article headlined Does Feminism Have Room for Zionists? was prompted by the controversial platform of the Womens Strike and the involvement of Odeh. Speaking to The Jewish Week the day after her piece was published, Shire said the outrage and negative comments she received in response to the article were unlike anything Ive ever experienced before. I received my first-ever comment from someone wishing I would die. http://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/ Its a reality that the extreme right and the extreme left are closer to each other than either is to the center. Hatred of Jews and Israel is a uniting factor. Whether from the left or the right, antisemites seem to get away with it. Theres nothing more to say.

Fair Usage Law

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Israel Apartheid  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."