Archive for the ‘Jewish Lobby’ Category

ANCA attack on Trend evidence that Armenian lobby lost its nerve – Trend News Agency

By Elkhan Alasgarov, for Trend:

The attack of the Armenian lobby on the Azerbaijani news agency Trend is not just another act of anti-Azerbaijani hysteria, but the evidence that the lobbys leaders lose their nerve.

The thing is that, with election of Donald Trump as the US president, the Armenian diasporas positions have been visibly shaken.

The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), an organism parasitizing on the body of the US, made a strategic mistake. Betting on Clinton in the presidential election, Armenian organizations spent huge amounts of money on an uncompromising and aggressive campaign against Trump.

Armenian lobbyists, sure of their impunity, used the entire set of available means starting from continuous attacks on the internet to active dissemination of disinformation and lies against Trump.

But the scheme of pushing interests forward worked out for many years has malfunctioned the money is gone, funds are empty and the prospect of outcast existence for the next four years is looming ahead.

There are already the first signs of this, and first of all, this is connected with the fact that Trump will not focus on such painful issue for Armenians as the so-called genocide.

ANCA is putting forward the issue of recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide by the US government to make further territorial claims to Turkey and Azerbaijan and demand reparations, i.e. money, for which ANCA does its utmost, by spreading lie on the so-called genocide all over the world.

But ANCA has failed. New President Donald Trump came to power, by speaking honestly with the US people and not deceiving them. Trump did not use cheap political show, like the so-called Armenian genocide comedy, to gain extra votes.

In the new conditions ANCA has been defeated not only by losing the leverage over the US foreign policy, but also in many other areas.

A prospect of losing the opportunities of money laundry and begging for the US budgetary funds allegedly for the population of Armenia and Karabakh separatists looms up around the Armenian diaspora.

Armenian diaspora becomes panic-stricken because all attempts of ANCA leaders to meet with Trump were rejected. The Armenian Diasporas California Courier newspaper testifies to it.

The prospect of a financial collapse has appeared for the Armenian diaspora of the United States that mainly consists of Dashnaks nationalist organizations.

Money obtained from taxpayers to finance Armenia and separatists in Nagorno-Karabakh was spent to support Clinton.

There are no funds for financing the ANCA structures with its numerous offices across the United States, branches in 25 states, representative offices in France, Italy, England and even the European Union.

It is unlikely that Trump, who took the course of regulation of financial costs, will agree to support a huge staff of Armenian propagandists that exist at the expense of the US taxpayers and dont serve for US interests.

The loss of the Armenian lobby to manipulate the authorities of the new administration is a bad precedent for them and an evidence of weakening leverage over Washington.

The myth of the omnipotence of the Armenian lobby in the US has fallen to pieces, especially after Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev congratulated the newly elected US President Donald Trump during a phone conversation.

The ANCA leaders, as well as the Armenian ruling elite are losing their nerves due to the prospects of increasing cooperation not only between Azerbaijan and the US, but also Israel.

Warm Azerbaijani-Israeli relations, Azerbaijans cooperation with the Jewish lobby in the US, as well as increasing awareness of Bakus fair position on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict are a nightmare for the ANCA.

Thanks to the long and painstaking work done by Azerbaijan, it becomes possible to break through the information blockade in the US.

Thus, the attacks against the Trend Agency are a sign of weakness, agony of the policy of widespread lies and misinformation, which had been the main weapon of the ANCA against Azerbaijan for a long time until Donald Trump was elected the US president.

Elkhan Alasgarov, PhD, is the head of the Baku Network’s expert council

Read the original:

ANCA attack on Trend evidence that Armenian lobby lost its nerve – Trend News Agency

Fair Usage Law

February 7, 2017   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!

BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so far!!

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Link: Hell Storm documentary

Please go to IMDB, create an account and write a negative review of this film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4661358/

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Holocaust What’s True and What is False?

Fair Usage Law

January 19, 2017   Posted in: AIPAC, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel Apartheid, Israeli Lobby, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Shoah, USS Liberty, Zionism  Comments Closed

Hate Radio: Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion turned into Audiobook

Something dangerous is happening, the hate is percolating like coffee, anti-Semites are turning all the anti-Semitic books from history into audiobooks.

This is a very dangerous development.

Please report this audiobook to The Internet Archive, ask them to delete it, before people download it and upload it to other video sharing web sites.

Please take action immediately, before the audio file gets a chance to propagate across the Internet.

Fair Usage Law

January 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Israel, Israel Apartheid, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Defense League, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Mark Potok, Morris Dees, Neo Nazi, Shoah, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

All in the Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots and the …

By the Editor.

While speaking to a 500-strong group of Jewish lobbyists in London in 2007, UK Prime Minister David Cameron declared,(1) I am a Zionist. He went on to add, Im not just a good friend of Israel but I am, as you put it, good for Jews.

These comments can easily be explained merely as fawning attempts to placate and appease the Jewish lobby a necessary step for any who wish to assume high office. One has to ask the question though: why does Anglican David Cameron conceal his own Jewish identity?

David Cameron is not merely of Jewish descent; he hails from a bloodline that can fairly be described as Jewish royalty, yet he claims never to have known this. As he spoke to the Movement for Reform Judaism in 2010 he described his learning of his Jewish ancestry(2) as the highlight of his year.

While studying the Cameron family tree in 2009,(3) Dr Yaakov Wise a University of Manchester historian who specialises in Jewish history found that David Cameron is descended from a highly distinguished Jewish family line (emphases added):

And according to Dr Wise, who has been using archival material to examine the Cameron family tree, the Tory leader could also be a direct descendent of the greatest ever Hebrew prophet, Moses.

Cameron is a descendent of banker Emile Levita, who came to Britain as a German immigrant in the 1850s. Emile Levita was himself a descendent of Elijah Levita, who lived from 1469-1549.

During the last years of his life Elijah Levita produced, among other works, two major books: the 1541 Translators Book, the first dictionary of the Targums or Aramaic commentaries on the Hebrew Bible.

His lexicon of 1542 explained much of the Mishnaic Hebrew language and was a supplement to two important earlier dictionaries.

Elijah Levita also wrote what is thought to be the first ever Yiddish novel called the Bove-bukh (The Book of Bove) written in 1507 and printed in 1541.

The book is based on an Italian version of an Anglo-Norman tale about a queen who betrays her husband and causes his death.

Emile Levita, who was granted citizenship in 1871, is Camerons great great grandfather.

Camerons great-great grandfather, Emile Levita was a German Jewish financier who emigrated to Britain and obtained British citizenship in 1871. Levita was the director of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China which in 1969 became Standard Chartered Bank. Levita himself is descended from Elijah Levita, a Jewish scholar of out-and-out luminary status whose writings included not only a dictionary explaining much of the Talmudic Hebrew language (or Mishnaic Hebrew), but the first ever Yiddish novel (Yiddish, meaning literally Jewish is a language of German Ashkenazi Jews written in the Hebrew alphabet).

Considering the sheer historical eminence of his ancestors, it would take real gullibility to believe that David Cameron found out about his roots one year before he assumed office. The question is not why did Cameron have no knowledge of his Jewish roots, but rather, why would he conceal his Jewish identity?

A 2006 report by the Jewish Chronicle(4) cited here by Stuart Littlewood(5) perhaps goes some way in explaining this. The report titled Team Camerons big Jewish backers is a laundry list of powerful members of the Jewish community who donated over 1 million to David Cameron, explaining his inexplicable rise to power after a relatively mundane and unremarkable political career.

The biggest Jewish donor to the party while Mr Cameron has been leader is gaming magnate Lord Steinberg, who has donated 530,000, plus a loan of 250,000. Hedge-fund owner Stanley Fink has donated 103,000, even though he was a declared supporter of Mr Camerons leadership rival, Liam Fox. A further 250,000 has been loaned by philanthropist Dame Vivien Duffield.

During Mr Camerons campaign to lead his party, Jewish figures gave his team (as opposed to the party) additional donations of more than 60,000. According to the JCs inquiries, direct donations to Team Cameron in the leadership battle came from philanthropist Trevor Pears (around 20,000), Bicom chair Poju Zabludowicz (15,000 plus 25,000 to the party), Next chief executive Simon Wolfson (10,000 plus 50,000 to the party), former Carlton TV boss Michael Green (10,000) and Tory deputy treasurer and key Cameron fundraiser Andrew Feldman (10,000 through his family firm, Jayroma).

Aside from these donations from powerful Jewish figures, a small but influential group of Jewish Conservative officials and politicians were also key players in Camerons campaign for leadership, the Jewish Chronicle report goes on to mention.(4)

In the aforementioned piece,(5) Stuart Littlewood makes an observation about the extent to which Jews are over-represented in the British parliament (emphases added):

While nobody is suggesting, I hope, that Jews have no place in our law-making, it is not unreasonable to wish the number to reflect their presence in the population. Three years ago the Jewish Chronicle published a list of Jewish MPs in Britains Parliament, naming 24. The Jewish population in the UK at that time was and probably still is around 280,000 or just under 0.5 per cent. There are 650 seats in the House of Commons so, on a proportional basis, Jews could expect three seats. But with 24 they were eight times over-represented. Which meant, of course, that other groups were under-represented.

The UKs Muslim population is about 2.4 million or nearly 4 per cent. Similarly, their quota would be 25 seats but they had only eight a serious shortfall. If Muslims were over-represented to the same extent as Jews (i.e. eight times) theyd have 200 seats. Imagine the hullabaloo.

David Cameron appointed the UKs first Jewish ambassador(6) to the Zionist regime, Matthew Gould.

Succeeded by David Cameron, the previous leader of the Conservative party, Michael Howard, is also Jewish,(7) as is the current leader of the UK Labour party, Ed Miliband.(8) Not bad going for a group that constitutes less than 0.5% of Britains population.

If the British public were to consider Camerons very real pursuance of Zionist policies in the context of his rise to power on the back of Jewish money, there would be a public awakening (which would no-doubt be labelled as anti-Semitism). In light of this, the decision to conceal his Jewish identity can easily be understood.

It is not democratic for a holder of high office to be put in place by the money of powerful political pressure groups. Nor is it democratic for one ethno-religious group to be grossly over-represented within the corridors of power.

If the interests of the Zionist regime and the powerful Jewish community were to conflict with those of the United Kingdom, who would David Im a Zionist Cameron really represent? If the recent wars on Libya and Syria are anything to go by, this question need not be asked.

(1) Cameron declares himself a Zionist The Jerusalem Post, 13 June 2007. (2) David Cameron Speaks to the Movement for Reform Judaism Written by Movement for Reform Judaism, 12 April 2010. (3) Illustrious Jewish roots of Tory leader revealed The University of Manchester, 10 July 2009. (4) Special report: Team Camerons big Jewish backers Bernard Josephs and Leon Symons The Jewish Chronicle, 12 October 2006. (5) David Camerons Torah government: Britains unbearable shame, by Stuart Littlewood. (6) Interview: The UKs new Jewish ambassador to Israel The Jewish Chronicle, 10 December 2009. (7) Britains Conservative Party To Elect First Jewish Leader The Jewish Federations of North America, 6 November 2010. (8) The Jewishness of Ed Miliband: Labours first Jewish leader bravely faces up to the Lefts anti-Semitic streak The Telegraph, 25 May 2012

Read more:

All in the Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots and the …

Fair Usage Law

November 22, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Clueless Corbyn and the Jewish Lobby

British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn is once again under attack from the Jewish lobbythis time for opposing anti-Semitism and defending Jews.

Corbyns error is that he expects political and moral consistency from the Jewish lobbywhile their only measure is what is good for Jews and Israel, regardless of the moral dimensions.

The latest attack on Corbyn has come about after the launch of his partys report on anti-Semitism commissioned in the wake of former London mayor Ken Livingstones completely accurate comment that there was an alliance between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement.

While introducing the report, Corbyn rejected anti-Semitism and said that the word Zio (presumably as in Zio-media) had no place in his party. Furthermore, he said, it was incorrect to say that Jews were involved in any sort of media or other conspiracy, or were aligned to any political movement.

Finally, he said that it was incorrect to say that his Jewish friends were responsible for the behavior of the state of Israel, any more than his Muslim friends were responsible for ISIS.

This last pointby which he obviously meant that not all Jews support Israel, and not all Muslims support ISISis however the one which has landed him in trouble with the Jewish lobby once again.

The Jewish lobbyaided by their controlled mediahave twisted and distorted this comment into meaning that he compared Israel to ISISa claim which is blatantly false.

Nonetheless, this lie is the theme which has been adopted in the Jewish lobbys new attack on Corbyn. As the Times of Israel reported, the Labour Partys foreign policy adviser, Emily Thornberry, has already apologized directly to the Israeli ambassador for Corbyns remarks.

In Israel, that countrys Labour Partytraditionally the firm political ally of Corbyns partyhas also attacked him. Leader Isaac Herzog said that Corbyns comparison [between Israel and ISIS] is shocking, unacceptable, and a betrayal of the values that the Labor movement represents around the world.

READ Controlled Media Admits that Austrian FP is Unstoppable

In Britain, that countrys Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, joined in, accusing Corbyn of making offensive comments and causing greater concern.

The former Chief Rabbi of the UK, Lord Jonathan Sacks, issued a statement saying that Corbyns remarks were demonization of the highest order, an outrage, and unacceptable. That this occurred at the launch of the report into the Labour Partys recent troubles with anti-Semitism shows how deep the sickness is in parts of the Left of British politics today.

The UKs Jewish Chronicle reported that the Jewish Human Rights Watch (JHRW) organization has formally written to the Labour Partys central office, objecting to Corbyns remarks.

The JHRW said Corbyns comments had demonized and delegitimized Israel in a way wholly consistent with modern anti-Semitism and the fact that he had chosen to make the remark on the release of the report serves only to underscore the reality that Mr. Corbyn has no interest in fighting anti-Semitism whatsoever.

In reality, Corbyn was trying to excuse Jewish support for Israeland that states ongoing war crimes and racial lawsby giving an out for Jews to claim that they do not support that state.

Therefore, Corbyns logic goes, if it is incorrect to assert that all Jews support Israel, then it is also incorrect to blame all Jews for Israels behavior.

There is no possible way Corbyns remarks could be construed as comparing Israel to ISIS.

The real reason for the hatred directed toward Corbyn is because he genuinely opposes many of the interests pursued by the Jewish lobbyon a purely moral basis.

In this regard, Corbyn has consistently opposed all the wars in the Middle East, fought on behalf of the Jewish lobby and to protect Israel, and he has also consistently supported the rights of the Palestinians not to be suppressed by the Israelis.

READ Heart Surgeons and Army Generals: Meet Golden Dawns Euro Parliamentary Candidates

At the same time, Corbyn expects the Jewish lobby to be as consistent as he is on these moral issuesand this is the cause of his downfall.

They are not interested in being morally or politically consistent, and operate on the principle of one rule for the Jews, another rule for the non-Jews.

Corbyn is clueless as to this principle upon which the Jewish lobby works, and this deliberate ignorance will cost him the leadership of the Labour Party in the very near future.

* Even the accuracy of Corbyns comments on Jews and Israel can be called into question.

As the worlds most famous ex-Jew, Gilad Atzmon, pointed out on his blog, Despite Israels devastating record of war atrocities, the vast majority of the worlds Jews support the Jewish state and identify with Zionism.

Furthermore, Atzmon said, the Jewish lobby dominates American, British and French foreign affairs. This lobby pushes for criminal immoral interventionist wars.

Corbyn obviously knows this since he has consistently voted against these wars.

None of these factors apply to Muslims or Islam. Only a fraction of Muslims worldwide support the Islamic state. In fact, the vast majority of Islamic leaders denounce Isis politically, religiously and culturally.

Finally, unlike Jewish oligarchs such as Haim Saban and George Soros, Muslim billionaires do not attempt to buy our political system.So I cant imagine what led Corbyn to make such a comparison.

READ Brussels: Patriots Disrupt Peaceniks

anti-SemitismBreakingFeaturedIsraelJeremy CorbynKen LivingstoneLabour PartyZionists

More:

Clueless Corbyn and the Jewish Lobby

Fair Usage Law

July 26, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Media Blacks Out Jewish Lobby-EU Report

A two-week-old academic report detailing the Jewish lobbys extensive influence in the European Union has been completely blacked out by the controlled media.

The report, titled The Israel Lobby and the European Union, details how the international Jewish lobby has persuaded European law-makers to refrain from sanctioning Israel over its human rights abuses, among many other things.

Researched and written by Public Interest Investigations and Spinwatch and published by EuroPal Forum, it explores a number of Israel lobby groups in the European Union, the power they wield, and the dubious sources that fund them, while also uncovering the secretive transatlantic networks behind them, according to an official press release.

The reports authors are listed as Professor David Miller from the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath, England; Sarah Marusek (a PhD in social science from the Maxwell School of Syracuse University), and currently a post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Religion Studies at the University of Johannesburg, SouthAfrica; and David Cronin, an Irish journalist living in Brussels.

From the backgrounds of the three authors, it is clear that they have sympathies toward the Palestinian causeand that they were motivated to compile the report in an attempt to understand why the EU always appears to support Israel.

The authors are careful to state that although their report details exactly how the Jewish lobby affects all aspects of EU policy, this does not mean that all Jews are involved in what it calls a matrix of relationships within the Israel lobby.

The authors also state that they do not support the theory that the Zionists control Western governmentsbut they then produce nearly 80 pages of referenced points proving exactly that.

This is, of course, the reason why the paper has been ignored, even though it was released on May 13 at the EU offices in Brussels and in London.

According to the official press statement, the paper uncovers the matrix of relationships within the Israel lobbya social movement that overlaps considerably with the transatlantic Islamophobia industry.

READ Hungarian Prime Minister Attacked because He Opposes Mass Immigration and Advocates Normal Heterosexual Families

The report says that Western politicians acquiescence to the Israeli narrative is made possible partly because there is a significant international network of groups dedicated to preserving the notion that a democratic Israel is merely acting in self-defense against Palestinian rocket fire.

These groups often work together or are aligned and many have close connections with the Israeli government and its diplomats. Collectively, they make up what is often known as the Israel lobby.

The first chapter discusses how populist parties in Europe have latched onto an anti-Muslim ideology which finds a natural ally in the state of Israel. These organizations include the Friends of Israel lobbies within almost all major European political parties.

Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)one of the largest suppliers of weapons to the

Israeli militaryis revealed to be one of the major financial sponsors of the EU-wide European Friends of Israel organization, along with a host of other prominent Jews living in Europe and America.

The second chapter details how the Jewish lobby has entrenched itself in Brussels through the creation of a network of organizations whose full-time job it is to continually lobby and influence EU policy, in exactly the same way that the American Israel Political Action Committee (APIAC) goes to work in Washington DC.

These organizations include the American Jewish Committees Transatlantic Institute, the Israel Allies Foundation, the Europe Israel Press Association, the European Foundation for Democracy, the European Coalition for Israel, the European Leadership Network, the Jewish News One, the European Jewish Parliament, and the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Centre.

All of these organizations, the report reveals, run effective propaganda campaigns to counter any negative publicity resulting from Israels suppression of the Palestinians, no matter how bloody and violent it may be.

The report identifies where pro-Israel groups receive their funding and how some of their donors have facilitated Israels illegal colonization of the West Bank, including east Jerusalem; examines how the lobby has persuaded European law-makers to refrain from sanctioning Israel over its human rights abuses; and analyzes how Israels supporters have been trying to undermine grassroots campaigning for justice in Palestine, the reports press release continues.

READ Austria Police: Dye Blonde Hair Dark

The report also examines EU-Israel trade relations, looking at key points in recent history such as Israels wars on Gaza and EU reactions to them. Perhaps the timeliest chapters in this report are the ones that deal with the issue of criminalizing resistance and silencing dissent, the press statement continued.

The Israel lobby in both the US and the EU has had considerable success in this arena. Lobby groups in the EU have used the closure of respected Muslim charities in the US to strengthen their call for European countries to classify Palestinian and Arab non-violent resistance to Israeli aggression as criminal.

The report also deals with the tactic employed by supporters of Israel of accusing its critics of anti-Semitism. This is very relevant to the recent Labour anti-Semitism row which has led to many debates regarding the blurring of the line between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionist or what is referred to as new anti-Semitism.

The Israel lobby is incredibly strong and wields a great amount of power in politics today, the press statement adds.

It is therefore little wonder that the controlled media has ignored the report and its conclusions.

The complete report can be downloaded here.

READ Jews Slam AFD, Love Merkel

BreakingEuropean UnionFeaturedIsraelIsraeli immigration policyJewish control of EU politicsJewish Lobby

See the original post:

Media Blacks Out Jewish Lobby-EU Report

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Inside The Jewish LobbyThe Most Powerful Racist …

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is possibly one of the least-known pinnacles of the Jewish Lobby in Americabut nothing represents more the power and influence of Jewish Supremacy in America.

While Jewish extremists such as the ADLs Abe Foxman continually claim that there is no Jewish lobby, the existence of the Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizationswhich represents the executive bodies of 50 major American Jewish organizationsincluding the ADLwhich has a combined net worth of over $1 billion, working exclusively for Jewish interests, proves Foxmans assertion to be a simple lie.

According to its own definition, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations Fund works to: eliminate racial and religious discrimination, including anti-Semitism; strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world; and promote individual liberties and human rights.

This is staggering hypocrisy of the worst degree. All these Jewish organizations fanatically support Israel, which, as everyone knows, is the most racist country on earth.

In Israel, Jews are not allowed to marry non-Jewsbut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to combat racism.

In Israel, Arabs and Muslims are forbidden from living in major housing developments and regions of the countrybut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to combat racial and religious discrimination.

In Israel, the Zionist Supremacists threaten world peace with their undeclared nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons stockpileswhich they have threatened to use against Europe in a Samson Option meltdown scenariobut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world.

In the Middle East, the Zionist fanatics openly declare their desire to see war in Syriaand elsewhereextended to serve Israels interestsbut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world.

In addition, all 50 of these Jewish organizations represented in the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations all have programs designed to promote Jewish identity and to lessen what they call assimilationand what is in reality mixing with non-Jewswhile at the same time claiming to promote individual liberties and human rights.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is also openly set up to advance Jewish interests, and Jewish interests alone. To this end, they have the following member organizations: Alpha Epsilon Pi; Ameinu; American Friends of Likud; American Gathering/ Federation of Jewish Holocaust Survivors; American Israel Public Affairs Committee; American Jewish Committee; American Jewish Congress; American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee; American Sephardi Federation; American Zionist Movement; American-Israel Friendship League; Americans for Peace Now; AMIT; Anti-Defamation League; Association of Reform Zionists of America; Bnai Zion; Bnai Brith International; Central Conference of American Rabbis; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America; Development Corporation for Israel / State of Israel Bonds; Emunah of America; Friends of Israel Defense Forces; Hadassah, Womens Zionist Organization of America; Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society; Jewish Community Centers Association; Jewish Council for Public Affairs; Jewish Federations of North America; Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs; Jewish Labor Committee; Jewish National Fund; Jewish Reconstructionist Movement; Jewish Women International; MERCAZ USA, Zionist Organization of the Conservative Movement; National Council of Jewish Women; National Council of Young Israel; NAAMAT USA; NCSJ: Advocates on behalf of Jews in Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States & Eurasia; ORT America; Rabbinical Assembly; Rabbinical Council of America; Religious Zionists of America; Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem; Union for Reform Judaism; Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America; United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; Womens International Zionist Organization; Womens League for Conservative Judaism; Workmens Circle; World ORT; Zionist Organization of America; Cantors Assembly; Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life; Maccabi USA; and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association.

There has been for many decades now a huge preponderance of Jews in high-level positions in the US government. On top of that there exists a vast, deep-pocketed Jewish-Zionist lobby apparatus in America which is relentlessly engaged in illegal bribing of US politicians and congressman to bolster support of Israel and the Zionist agenda.

A few such treasonous organizations are: American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, Bnai Brith International among dozens of others.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations lists on its board of members 52 powerful Jewish groups in America alone that wield tremendous influence in American political life.

Kevin MacDonald, a psychology professor at the University of California, Longbeach, noted:

there are approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in the United States with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billiona sum greater than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations.

According to sociologist James Petras book The Power of Israel in the United States, AIPAC alone has 60,000 wealthy members with an annual budget of $60,000,000.

TheConference of Presidents of Major American Jewish OrganizationsAIPAC work together, with all members of the conference sitting on AIPACs executive committee, which is distinct from its board of directors.

The two organizations follow a clear division of labor. The conference focuses on the executive branch of the U.S. government, while AIPAC lobbies in Congress.

The conferences website states that it engages in consensus policy, collective action, and maximizing the resources of the American Jewish community, in particular, when events in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere affect the American Jewish community.

The stated goals of the Conference

are strengthening the special U.S.-Israel relationship; ensuring that Israels interests are understood by policy makers, opinion molders and the American public; addressing critical foreign policy issues that impact the American Jewish community; representing the interests of organized American Jewry; and protecting the security and dignity of Jews around the world.

This then, is the real face of the Jewish lobby which Foxman and others claims does not even exist. It is the lobby which determines and controls which candidates get to stand for election, which election candidates get financial backing, which candidates get media coverageand ultimately, what the policies are of those who get to sit in the seats of power of Washington D.C.

It is the true occupying force behind the government of the United States of America, and until it is overthrown, there will never be peace and stability anywhere in the world.

Excerpt from:

Inside The Jewish LobbyThe Most Powerful Racist …

Fair Usage Law

June 18, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Jewish lobby – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term Jewish lobby is used to describe organized lobbying attributed to Jews on domestic and foreign policy decisions, as a political participant of representative government, conducted predominantly in the Jewish diaspora in a number of Western countries. While at times self-described,[citation needed] usage of the term is viewed as inaccurate,[citation needed] and, particularly when used to allege disproportionate Jewish influence, it can be perceived as pejorative or may constitute antisemitism.[citation needed]

In his Dictionary of Politics (1992), Walter John Raymond describes the term “Jewish Lobby” as “A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the State of Israel.” He also notes that “[a]mong those organizations which are most actively involved in lobbying activities at federal, state and local levels of political and governmental institutions are: the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the American Jewish Committee… and the B’nai B’rith.”[1]Dominique Vidal, writing in Le Monde diplomatique, states that in the United States the term is “self-described” and it “is only one of many influence groups that have official standing with institutions and authorities.”[2]

The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia states in its description, “It is important to recognise that lobbies are natural parts of pluralist, democratic societies such as Australia. Lobbying constitutes a mainstream method of influencing government policy, as a means of enhancing representative government. As such, just as other communities and interest groups have lobbies, there is a Jewish lobby an unwieldy group of individuals and organisations devoted to supporting the needs and interests of the Jewish community. This Jewish lobby is a player in representative government, and its very existence confirms the ordinary place Jews have within Australian politics. The assumption, however, that Jews have a disproportionate power and influence over decision making is what transforms a descriptive reality about politics to an antisemitic argument about Jewish power.”[3]

Noting the high voting rate of individual American Jews in elections, J.J. Goldberg, editorial director of The Forward, stated in a 2004 speech that “The Jewish lobby… is actually more than just a dozen organizations. The Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, Hadassah, of course, AIPAC, but it is also the impact of the Jewish role. … So, the Jewish influence is a lot of things. It is the organizations, its the vote, its fundraising.”[4]

Mitchell Bard, director of the non-profit Jewish Virtual Library, writes that: “Reference is often made to the ‘Jewish lobby’ in an effort to describe Jewish influence, but this term is both vague and inadequate. While it is true that American Jews are sometimes represented by lobbyists, such direct efforts to influence policy-makers are but a small part of the lobbys ability to shape policy.”[5] Bard argues the term Israel lobby is more accurate, because it comprises both formal and informal elements (which includes public opinion), and “…because a large proportion of the lobby is made up of non-Jews.”[6] In his 1987 work, The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy, Edward Tivnan states that the term “needed some fine-tuning; what was most at issue… was the influence of the ‘pro-Israel lobby.'”[7]

In a letter to the editor of the New York Times Sunday Review of Books, responding to a review by Leslie Gelb of their 2007 book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,[8]University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Harvard University professor Stephen Walt write: “Gelb refers repeatedly to a ‘Jewish lobby,’ despite the fact that we never employ the term in our book. Indeed, we explicitly rejected this label as inaccurate and misleading, both because the lobby includes non-Jews like the Christian Zionists and because many Jewish Americans do not support the hard-line policies favored by its most powerful elements.”[9] The previous week, in a live Q&A session at The Washington Post, they stated they themselves “never use the term ‘Jewish lobby’ because the lobby is defined by its political agenda, not by religion or ethnicity.”[10]

Robert S. Wistrich, of the International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, sees reference to the phrase, when used to describe an “all-powerful ‘Jewish Lobby’ that prevents justice in the Middle East”, as reliance on a classic antisemitic stereotype.[11]

Bruno Bettelheim detested the term, arguing “The self-importance of Jews combined with the paranoia of the anti-Semite had created the image of this lobby.”[12] Michael Lasky describes the term as an “unfortunate phrase”, and “imagines” that Alexander Walker’s use of it while writing about the Nazi films of Leni Riefenstahl was not intended pejoratively.[13]

The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia states that “the stereotype of the ‘Jewish lobby’ is that the Jewish engagement in politics and policy debate is above and beyond the ordinary participation of a group in public policy-making. It paints Jewish involvement as surreptitious, and as subverting the democratic process. It alleges that a ‘Jewish lobby’, through bribery, bullying and manipulation, pressures politicians to act against their will and duties.[14] Michael Visontay, editor of Australia’s The Sydney Morning Herald, wrote in 2003 that “The way the phrase ‘Jewish lobby’ has been bandied about in numerous letters implies there is something inherently sinister in lobbying when Jews do it.”[15] According to Geoffrey Brahm Levey and Philip Mendes, the term is used in Australia as a pejorative description of the way in which the Jewish community influences the Liberal Party “by talking to its leaders and making them aware of Jewish wishes and views”.[16]

Dominique Schnapper, Chantal Bordes-Benayoun and Freddy Raphal write that following the 1991 Gulf War, the term “began to be heard in political life” in France.[17] Vidal writes that the term has been used there exclusively by the French far right as “a phrase that combines standard anti-semitic fantasies about Jewish finance, media control and power; the term is the contemporary equivalent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion”.[2]Loyola University Chicago professor Wiley Feinstein wrote in 2003 that “there is much talk of the ‘Jewish lobby’ in the Italian Press and in Europe”, describing the term as “a phrase[] of scorn for Jews and Judaism”.[18]

William Safire wrote in 1993 that in the United Kingdom “Jewish lobby” is used as an “even more pejorative” term for “the ‘Israel lobby'”.[19] Susan Jacobs of Manchester Metropolitan University writes that the phrase “Jewish lobby”, when used “without mentioning other lobbies or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine”, is a contemporary form of the fear of a Jewish conspiracy.[20]

In a 2004 speech, Goldberg said, “There has been an awful lot of talk in the last few years about the rise of the Jewish lobby and the influence of the Jewish lobby. It used to be that you couldn’t talk about this sort of thing. When I wrote [the book] Jewish Power in 1996… I was accused by various Jewish lobbyists of inflating and buying into the old myths of international Jewish conspiracies simply by the use of the title.”[4] Goldberg disagrees with the sensitivity towards the use of the term, arguing that: “There is such a thing as a Jewish lobby, that the network of organizations that works together to put across what might be called the Jewish community’s view on world affairs is not insignificant, it’s not an invention, but it is not some sort of all-powerful octopus that its sometimes portrayed as these days.”[4] Mearsheimer and Walt wrote in 2006 that “even the Israeli media refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby'”,[21] and stated the following year that “AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents and the Israeli media themselves refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby’.”[22]

After South African activist, Christian cleric, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu used it in a 1985 speech at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, a supporter wrote him privately urging him to avoid the phrase, stating it was “language… normally associated with the less than philo-Semitic elements of our acquaintance”.[23] Tutu used the phrase again in a 2002 editorial in The Guardian, stating “People are scared in this country [the US], to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful very powerful. Well, so what? For goodness sake, this is God’s world!”[24] This use was criticized by Melanie Phillips of the Daily Mail.[25] When he edited and reprinted parts of his speech in 2005, Tutu replaced the words “Jewish lobby” with “pro-Israeli lobby”.[26] In 2007, an invitation to Tutu to speak at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota was rescinded because of the speech; writing in Mother Jones, Justin Elliot stated “Tutu’s use of the phrase ‘Jewish lobby’ is regrettable, mainly because the pro-Israel lobby he is referring to is not made up exclusively of Jews, example Texas preacher John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel. But one minor slip five years ago is hardly grounds for blacklisting him.”[27]

Chris Davies, MEP for the northwest of England was forced to resign in 2006 as leader of the Liberal Democrats group in the European Parliament after writing to a constituent I shall denounce the influence of the Jewish lobby that seems to have far too great a say over the political decision-making process in many countries.[28] In comments to TotallyJewish.Com he “confessed he didnt know the difference between referring to the ‘pro Israel lobby’ and the ‘Jewish lobby’,” and added Im quite prepared to accept that I dont understand the semantics of some of these things.[29] Commenting on Davies’ use of the term, David Hirsh of The Guardian wrote that Davies “had to resign because his laudable instinct to side with the underdog was not tempered by care, thought or self-education.” He compared Davies’ rhetoric with the “care to avoid openly antisemitic rhetoric taken by sophisticates like Mearsheimer and Walt and Robert Fisk.”[28]

A 2007 editorial in The New York Sun accused Richard Dawkins, a British evolutionary biologist and writer, of repeating antisemitic conspiracy theories after he used the term in an interview published in The Guardian.[30] In the interview Dawkins said: “When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told – religious Jews anyway – than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.”[31] In a National Review column discussing the influence of “high-profile atheists” on the American left, Arthur C. Brooks wrote that Dawkins’ claim was “anti-Semitic, slanders religion, and asserts victimhood.”[32]David Cesarani, commenting in The Guardian, stated that “Mearsheimer and Walt would doubtless chide Dawkins for using the term ‘Jewish lobby’, which they studiously avoid in order to give no truck to anti-Jewish innuendo.”[33]

In his book Jewish Power, Goldberg writes that in the United States the “Jewish lobby” for decades played a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self-interest. It was thrust into prominence following the Nixon Administration’s sharp shift of American policy towards significant military and foreign aid support for Israel following the 1973 Yom Kippur War.[34]

Tivnan writes that a “full-fledged ‘Jewish lobby'” was developed in 1943, in which the moderates represented by Stephen Samuel Wise and the American Jewish Committee were defeated by supporters of Abba Hillel Silver and “the maximalist goal of a ‘Jewish Commonwealth'” at the American Jewish and Biltmore Conferences. Silver became the new leader of American Zionism, with his call for “loud diplomacy”, and he then “cranked up the Zionist Organization of America’s one-man lobbying operation in Washingtonrenaming it the American Zionist Emergency Council (AZEC)and began to mobilize American Jewry into a mass movement.”[35]

Former New York Times journalist Youssef Ibrahim writes: “That there is a Jewish lobby in America concerned with the well-being of Israel is a silly question. It is insane to ask whether the 6 million American Jews should be concerned about the 6 million Israeli Jews, particularly in view of the massacre of another 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. It’s elementary, my dear Watson: Any people who do not care for their own are not worthy of concern. And what the Israel lobby does is what all ethnic lobbies Greek, Armenian, Latvian, Irish, Cuban, and others do in this democracy.”[36]

Read the rest here:

Jewish lobby – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

ANCA attack on Trend evidence that Armenian lobby lost its nerve – Trend News Agency

By Elkhan Alasgarov, for Trend: The attack of the Armenian lobby on the Azerbaijani news agency Trend is not just another act of anti-Azerbaijani hysteria, but the evidence that the lobbys leaders lose their nerve. The thing is that, with election of Donald Trump as the US president, the Armenian diasporas positions have been visibly shaken. The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), an organism parasitizing on the body of the US, made a strategic mistake. Betting on Clinton in the presidential election, Armenian organizations spent huge amounts of money on an uncompromising and aggressive campaign against Trump. Armenian lobbyists, sure of their impunity, used the entire set of available means starting from continuous attacks on the internet to active dissemination of disinformation and lies against Trump. But the scheme of pushing interests forward worked out for many years has malfunctioned the money is gone, funds are empty and the prospect of outcast existence for the next four years is looming ahead. There are already the first signs of this, and first of all, this is connected with the fact that Trump will not focus on such painful issue for Armenians as the so-called genocide. ANCA is putting forward the issue of recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide by the US government to make further territorial claims to Turkey and Azerbaijan and demand reparations, i.e. money, for which ANCA does its utmost, by spreading lie on the so-called genocide all over the world. But ANCA has failed. New President Donald Trump came to power, by speaking honestly with the US people and not deceiving them. Trump did not use cheap political show, like the so-called Armenian genocide comedy, to gain extra votes. In the new conditions ANCA has been defeated not only by losing the leverage over the US foreign policy, but also in many other areas. A prospect of losing the opportunities of money laundry and begging for the US budgetary funds allegedly for the population of Armenia and Karabakh separatists looms up around the Armenian diaspora. Armenian diaspora becomes panic-stricken because all attempts of ANCA leaders to meet with Trump were rejected. The Armenian Diasporas California Courier newspaper testifies to it. The prospect of a financial collapse has appeared for the Armenian diaspora of the United States that mainly consists of Dashnaks nationalist organizations. Money obtained from taxpayers to finance Armenia and separatists in Nagorno-Karabakh was spent to support Clinton. There are no funds for financing the ANCA structures with its numerous offices across the United States, branches in 25 states, representative offices in France, Italy, England and even the European Union. It is unlikely that Trump, who took the course of regulation of financial costs, will agree to support a huge staff of Armenian propagandists that exist at the expense of the US taxpayers and dont serve for US interests. The loss of the Armenian lobby to manipulate the authorities of the new administration is a bad precedent for them and an evidence of weakening leverage over Washington. The myth of the omnipotence of the Armenian lobby in the US has fallen to pieces, especially after Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev congratulated the newly elected US President Donald Trump during a phone conversation. The ANCA leaders, as well as the Armenian ruling elite are losing their nerves due to the prospects of increasing cooperation not only between Azerbaijan and the US, but also Israel. Warm Azerbaijani-Israeli relations, Azerbaijans cooperation with the Jewish lobby in the US, as well as increasing awareness of Bakus fair position on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict are a nightmare for the ANCA. Thanks to the long and painstaking work done by Azerbaijan, it becomes possible to break through the information blockade in the US. Thus, the attacks against the Trend Agency are a sign of weakness, agony of the policy of widespread lies and misinformation, which had been the main weapon of the ANCA against Azerbaijan for a long time until Donald Trump was elected the US president. — Elkhan Alasgarov, PhD, is the head of the Baku Network’s expert council

Fair Usage Law

February 7, 2017   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Hell Storm Documentary Post Hitler Nazi Germany 1945 — Hiter Nazi Revisionism

SHUT IT DOWN, NOW!BIG VICTORY!! We got this video censored in 25% of the world’s countries by relentlessly pressuring YouTube and Governments around the world to Censor and suppress this video. 25% down, 75% to go, help us get this video deleted, blocked and banned everywhere in the world, we have had great success so […]

Fair Usage Law

February 4, 2017   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, AIPAC, Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism Lobby, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Censorship, Discrimination News, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Hitler, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Hush Crimes, Israel, Israeli Lobby, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Misc, Multicultural News, Neo Nazi, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, Simon Wiesenthal, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, World War II, Zionism  Comments Closed

The Holocaust What’s True and What is False?

Fair Usage Law

January 19, 2017   Posted in: AIPAC, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel Apartheid, Israeli Lobby, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Shoah, USS Liberty, Zionism  Comments Closed

Hate Radio: Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion turned into Audiobook

Something dangerous is happening, the hate is percolating like coffee, anti-Semites are turning all the anti-Semitic books from history into audiobooks.This is a very dangerous development.Please report this audiobook to The Internet Archive, ask them to delete it, before people download it and upload it to other video sharing web sites.Please take action immediately, before […]

Fair Usage Law

January 1, 2017   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Israel, Israel Apartheid, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Defense League, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Judaism, Mark Potok, Morris Dees, Neo Nazi, Shoah, SPLC, White Nationalism, White Power, White Privilege, White Racism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

All in the Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots and the …

By the Editor. While speaking to a 500-strong group of Jewish lobbyists in London in 2007, UK Prime Minister David Cameron declared,(1) I am a Zionist. He went on to add, Im not just a good friend of Israel but I am, as you put it, good for Jews. These comments can easily be explained merely as fawning attempts to placate and appease the Jewish lobby a necessary step for any who wish to assume high office. One has to ask the question though: why does Anglican David Cameron conceal his own Jewish identity? David Cameron is not merely of Jewish descent; he hails from a bloodline that can fairly be described as Jewish royalty, yet he claims never to have known this. As he spoke to the Movement for Reform Judaism in 2010 he described his learning of his Jewish ancestry(2) as the highlight of his year. While studying the Cameron family tree in 2009,(3) Dr Yaakov Wise a University of Manchester historian who specialises in Jewish history found that David Cameron is descended from a highly distinguished Jewish family line (emphases added): And according to Dr Wise, who has been using archival material to examine the Cameron family tree, the Tory leader could also be a direct descendent of the greatest ever Hebrew prophet, Moses. Cameron is a descendent of banker Emile Levita, who came to Britain as a German immigrant in the 1850s. Emile Levita was himself a descendent of Elijah Levita, who lived from 1469-1549. During the last years of his life Elijah Levita produced, among other works, two major books: the 1541 Translators Book, the first dictionary of the Targums or Aramaic commentaries on the Hebrew Bible. His lexicon of 1542 explained much of the Mishnaic Hebrew language and was a supplement to two important earlier dictionaries. Elijah Levita also wrote what is thought to be the first ever Yiddish novel called the Bove-bukh (The Book of Bove) written in 1507 and printed in 1541. The book is based on an Italian version of an Anglo-Norman tale about a queen who betrays her husband and causes his death. Emile Levita, who was granted citizenship in 1871, is Camerons great great grandfather. Camerons great-great grandfather, Emile Levita was a German Jewish financier who emigrated to Britain and obtained British citizenship in 1871. Levita was the director of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China which in 1969 became Standard Chartered Bank. Levita himself is descended from Elijah Levita, a Jewish scholar of out-and-out luminary status whose writings included not only a dictionary explaining much of the Talmudic Hebrew language (or Mishnaic Hebrew), but the first ever Yiddish novel (Yiddish, meaning literally Jewish is a language of German Ashkenazi Jews written in the Hebrew alphabet). Considering the sheer historical eminence of his ancestors, it would take real gullibility to believe that David Cameron found out about his roots one year before he assumed office. The question is not why did Cameron have no knowledge of his Jewish roots, but rather, why would he conceal his Jewish identity? A 2006 report by the Jewish Chronicle(4) cited here by Stuart Littlewood(5) perhaps goes some way in explaining this. The report titled Team Camerons big Jewish backers is a laundry list of powerful members of the Jewish community who donated over 1 million to David Cameron, explaining his inexplicable rise to power after a relatively mundane and unremarkable political career. The biggest Jewish donor to the party while Mr Cameron has been leader is gaming magnate Lord Steinberg, who has donated 530,000, plus a loan of 250,000. Hedge-fund owner Stanley Fink has donated 103,000, even though he was a declared supporter of Mr Camerons leadership rival, Liam Fox. A further 250,000 has been loaned by philanthropist Dame Vivien Duffield. During Mr Camerons campaign to lead his party, Jewish figures gave his team (as opposed to the party) additional donations of more than 60,000. According to the JCs inquiries, direct donations to Team Cameron in the leadership battle came from philanthropist Trevor Pears (around 20,000), Bicom chair Poju Zabludowicz (15,000 plus 25,000 to the party), Next chief executive Simon Wolfson (10,000 plus 50,000 to the party), former Carlton TV boss Michael Green (10,000) and Tory deputy treasurer and key Cameron fundraiser Andrew Feldman (10,000 through his family firm, Jayroma). Aside from these donations from powerful Jewish figures, a small but influential group of Jewish Conservative officials and politicians were also key players in Camerons campaign for leadership, the Jewish Chronicle report goes on to mention.(4) In the aforementioned piece,(5) Stuart Littlewood makes an observation about the extent to which Jews are over-represented in the British parliament (emphases added): While nobody is suggesting, I hope, that Jews have no place in our law-making, it is not unreasonable to wish the number to reflect their presence in the population. Three years ago the Jewish Chronicle published a list of Jewish MPs in Britains Parliament, naming 24. The Jewish population in the UK at that time was and probably still is around 280,000 or just under 0.5 per cent. There are 650 seats in the House of Commons so, on a proportional basis, Jews could expect three seats. But with 24 they were eight times over-represented. Which meant, of course, that other groups were under-represented. The UKs Muslim population is about 2.4 million or nearly 4 per cent. Similarly, their quota would be 25 seats but they had only eight a serious shortfall. If Muslims were over-represented to the same extent as Jews (i.e. eight times) theyd have 200 seats. Imagine the hullabaloo. David Cameron appointed the UKs first Jewish ambassador(6) to the Zionist regime, Matthew Gould. Succeeded by David Cameron, the previous leader of the Conservative party, Michael Howard, is also Jewish,(7) as is the current leader of the UK Labour party, Ed Miliband.(8) Not bad going for a group that constitutes less than 0.5% of Britains population. If the British public were to consider Camerons very real pursuance of Zionist policies in the context of his rise to power on the back of Jewish money, there would be a public awakening (which would no-doubt be labelled as anti-Semitism). In light of this, the decision to conceal his Jewish identity can easily be understood. It is not democratic for a holder of high office to be put in place by the money of powerful political pressure groups. Nor is it democratic for one ethno-religious group to be grossly over-represented within the corridors of power. If the interests of the Zionist regime and the powerful Jewish community were to conflict with those of the United Kingdom, who would David Im a Zionist Cameron really represent? If the recent wars on Libya and Syria are anything to go by, this question need not be asked. (1) Cameron declares himself a Zionist The Jerusalem Post, 13 June 2007. (2) David Cameron Speaks to the Movement for Reform Judaism Written by Movement for Reform Judaism, 12 April 2010. (3) Illustrious Jewish roots of Tory leader revealed The University of Manchester, 10 July 2009. (4) Special report: Team Camerons big Jewish backers Bernard Josephs and Leon Symons The Jewish Chronicle, 12 October 2006. (5) David Camerons Torah government: Britains unbearable shame, by Stuart Littlewood. (6) Interview: The UKs new Jewish ambassador to Israel The Jewish Chronicle, 10 December 2009. (7) Britains Conservative Party To Elect First Jewish Leader The Jewish Federations of North America, 6 November 2010. (8) The Jewishness of Ed Miliband: Labours first Jewish leader bravely faces up to the Lefts anti-Semitic streak The Telegraph, 25 May 2012

Fair Usage Law

November 22, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Clueless Corbyn and the Jewish Lobby

British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn is once again under attack from the Jewish lobbythis time for opposing anti-Semitism and defending Jews. Corbyns error is that he expects political and moral consistency from the Jewish lobbywhile their only measure is what is good for Jews and Israel, regardless of the moral dimensions. The latest attack on Corbyn has come about after the launch of his partys report on anti-Semitism commissioned in the wake of former London mayor Ken Livingstones completely accurate comment that there was an alliance between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement. While introducing the report, Corbyn rejected anti-Semitism and said that the word Zio (presumably as in Zio-media) had no place in his party. Furthermore, he said, it was incorrect to say that Jews were involved in any sort of media or other conspiracy, or were aligned to any political movement. Finally, he said that it was incorrect to say that his Jewish friends were responsible for the behavior of the state of Israel, any more than his Muslim friends were responsible for ISIS. This last pointby which he obviously meant that not all Jews support Israel, and not all Muslims support ISISis however the one which has landed him in trouble with the Jewish lobby once again. The Jewish lobbyaided by their controlled mediahave twisted and distorted this comment into meaning that he compared Israel to ISISa claim which is blatantly false. Nonetheless, this lie is the theme which has been adopted in the Jewish lobbys new attack on Corbyn. As the Times of Israel reported, the Labour Partys foreign policy adviser, Emily Thornberry, has already apologized directly to the Israeli ambassador for Corbyns remarks. In Israel, that countrys Labour Partytraditionally the firm political ally of Corbyns partyhas also attacked him. Leader Isaac Herzog said that Corbyns comparison [between Israel and ISIS] is shocking, unacceptable, and a betrayal of the values that the Labor movement represents around the world. READ Controlled Media Admits that Austrian FP is Unstoppable In Britain, that countrys Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, joined in, accusing Corbyn of making offensive comments and causing greater concern. The former Chief Rabbi of the UK, Lord Jonathan Sacks, issued a statement saying that Corbyns remarks were demonization of the highest order, an outrage, and unacceptable. That this occurred at the launch of the report into the Labour Partys recent troubles with anti-Semitism shows how deep the sickness is in parts of the Left of British politics today. The UKs Jewish Chronicle reported that the Jewish Human Rights Watch (JHRW) organization has formally written to the Labour Partys central office, objecting to Corbyns remarks. The JHRW said Corbyns comments had demonized and delegitimized Israel in a way wholly consistent with modern anti-Semitism and the fact that he had chosen to make the remark on the release of the report serves only to underscore the reality that Mr. Corbyn has no interest in fighting anti-Semitism whatsoever. In reality, Corbyn was trying to excuse Jewish support for Israeland that states ongoing war crimes and racial lawsby giving an out for Jews to claim that they do not support that state. Therefore, Corbyns logic goes, if it is incorrect to assert that all Jews support Israel, then it is also incorrect to blame all Jews for Israels behavior. There is no possible way Corbyns remarks could be construed as comparing Israel to ISIS. The real reason for the hatred directed toward Corbyn is because he genuinely opposes many of the interests pursued by the Jewish lobbyon a purely moral basis. In this regard, Corbyn has consistently opposed all the wars in the Middle East, fought on behalf of the Jewish lobby and to protect Israel, and he has also consistently supported the rights of the Palestinians not to be suppressed by the Israelis. READ Heart Surgeons and Army Generals: Meet Golden Dawns Euro Parliamentary Candidates At the same time, Corbyn expects the Jewish lobby to be as consistent as he is on these moral issuesand this is the cause of his downfall. They are not interested in being morally or politically consistent, and operate on the principle of one rule for the Jews, another rule for the non-Jews. Corbyn is clueless as to this principle upon which the Jewish lobby works, and this deliberate ignorance will cost him the leadership of the Labour Party in the very near future. * Even the accuracy of Corbyns comments on Jews and Israel can be called into question. As the worlds most famous ex-Jew, Gilad Atzmon, pointed out on his blog, Despite Israels devastating record of war atrocities, the vast majority of the worlds Jews support the Jewish state and identify with Zionism. Furthermore, Atzmon said, the Jewish lobby dominates American, British and French foreign affairs. This lobby pushes for criminal immoral interventionist wars. Corbyn obviously knows this since he has consistently voted against these wars. None of these factors apply to Muslims or Islam. Only a fraction of Muslims worldwide support the Islamic state. In fact, the vast majority of Islamic leaders denounce Isis politically, religiously and culturally. Finally, unlike Jewish oligarchs such as Haim Saban and George Soros, Muslim billionaires do not attempt to buy our political system.So I cant imagine what led Corbyn to make such a comparison. READ Brussels: Patriots Disrupt Peaceniks anti-SemitismBreakingFeaturedIsraelJeremy CorbynKen LivingstoneLabour PartyZionists

Fair Usage Law

July 26, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Media Blacks Out Jewish Lobby-EU Report

A two-week-old academic report detailing the Jewish lobbys extensive influence in the European Union has been completely blacked out by the controlled media. The report, titled The Israel Lobby and the European Union, details how the international Jewish lobby has persuaded European law-makers to refrain from sanctioning Israel over its human rights abuses, among many other things. Researched and written by Public Interest Investigations and Spinwatch and published by EuroPal Forum, it explores a number of Israel lobby groups in the European Union, the power they wield, and the dubious sources that fund them, while also uncovering the secretive transatlantic networks behind them, according to an official press release. The reports authors are listed as Professor David Miller from the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath, England; Sarah Marusek (a PhD in social science from the Maxwell School of Syracuse University), and currently a post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Religion Studies at the University of Johannesburg, SouthAfrica; and David Cronin, an Irish journalist living in Brussels. From the backgrounds of the three authors, it is clear that they have sympathies toward the Palestinian causeand that they were motivated to compile the report in an attempt to understand why the EU always appears to support Israel. The authors are careful to state that although their report details exactly how the Jewish lobby affects all aspects of EU policy, this does not mean that all Jews are involved in what it calls a matrix of relationships within the Israel lobby. The authors also state that they do not support the theory that the Zionists control Western governmentsbut they then produce nearly 80 pages of referenced points proving exactly that. This is, of course, the reason why the paper has been ignored, even though it was released on May 13 at the EU offices in Brussels and in London. According to the official press statement, the paper uncovers the matrix of relationships within the Israel lobbya social movement that overlaps considerably with the transatlantic Islamophobia industry. READ Hungarian Prime Minister Attacked because He Opposes Mass Immigration and Advocates Normal Heterosexual Families The report says that Western politicians acquiescence to the Israeli narrative is made possible partly because there is a significant international network of groups dedicated to preserving the notion that a democratic Israel is merely acting in self-defense against Palestinian rocket fire. These groups often work together or are aligned and many have close connections with the Israeli government and its diplomats. Collectively, they make up what is often known as the Israel lobby. The first chapter discusses how populist parties in Europe have latched onto an anti-Muslim ideology which finds a natural ally in the state of Israel. These organizations include the Friends of Israel lobbies within almost all major European political parties. Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)one of the largest suppliers of weapons to the Israeli militaryis revealed to be one of the major financial sponsors of the EU-wide European Friends of Israel organization, along with a host of other prominent Jews living in Europe and America. The second chapter details how the Jewish lobby has entrenched itself in Brussels through the creation of a network of organizations whose full-time job it is to continually lobby and influence EU policy, in exactly the same way that the American Israel Political Action Committee (APIAC) goes to work in Washington DC. These organizations include the American Jewish Committees Transatlantic Institute, the Israel Allies Foundation, the Europe Israel Press Association, the European Foundation for Democracy, the European Coalition for Israel, the European Leadership Network, the Jewish News One, the European Jewish Parliament, and the European Strategic Intelligence and Security Centre. All of these organizations, the report reveals, run effective propaganda campaigns to counter any negative publicity resulting from Israels suppression of the Palestinians, no matter how bloody and violent it may be. The report identifies where pro-Israel groups receive their funding and how some of their donors have facilitated Israels illegal colonization of the West Bank, including east Jerusalem; examines how the lobby has persuaded European law-makers to refrain from sanctioning Israel over its human rights abuses; and analyzes how Israels supporters have been trying to undermine grassroots campaigning for justice in Palestine, the reports press release continues. READ Austria Police: Dye Blonde Hair Dark The report also examines EU-Israel trade relations, looking at key points in recent history such as Israels wars on Gaza and EU reactions to them. Perhaps the timeliest chapters in this report are the ones that deal with the issue of criminalizing resistance and silencing dissent, the press statement continued. The Israel lobby in both the US and the EU has had considerable success in this arena. Lobby groups in the EU have used the closure of respected Muslim charities in the US to strengthen their call for European countries to classify Palestinian and Arab non-violent resistance to Israeli aggression as criminal. The report also deals with the tactic employed by supporters of Israel of accusing its critics of anti-Semitism. This is very relevant to the recent Labour anti-Semitism row which has led to many debates regarding the blurring of the line between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionist or what is referred to as new anti-Semitism. The Israel lobby is incredibly strong and wields a great amount of power in politics today, the press statement adds. It is therefore little wonder that the controlled media has ignored the report and its conclusions. The complete report can be downloaded here. READ Jews Slam AFD, Love Merkel BreakingEuropean UnionFeaturedIsraelIsraeli immigration policyJewish control of EU politicsJewish Lobby

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Inside The Jewish LobbyThe Most Powerful Racist …

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is possibly one of the least-known pinnacles of the Jewish Lobby in Americabut nothing represents more the power and influence of Jewish Supremacy in America. While Jewish extremists such as the ADLs Abe Foxman continually claim that there is no Jewish lobby, the existence of the Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizationswhich represents the executive bodies of 50 major American Jewish organizationsincluding the ADLwhich has a combined net worth of over $1 billion, working exclusively for Jewish interests, proves Foxmans assertion to be a simple lie. According to its own definition, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations Fund works to: eliminate racial and religious discrimination, including anti-Semitism; strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world; and promote individual liberties and human rights. This is staggering hypocrisy of the worst degree. All these Jewish organizations fanatically support Israel, which, as everyone knows, is the most racist country on earth. In Israel, Jews are not allowed to marry non-Jewsbut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to combat racism. In Israel, Arabs and Muslims are forbidden from living in major housing developments and regions of the countrybut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to combat racial and religious discrimination. In Israel, the Zionist Supremacists threaten world peace with their undeclared nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons stockpileswhich they have threatened to use against Europe in a Samson Option meltdown scenariobut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world. In the Middle East, the Zionist fanatics openly declare their desire to see war in Syriaand elsewhereextended to serve Israels interestsbut in America, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations works to strengthen and help stabilize peace throughout the world. In addition, all 50 of these Jewish organizations represented in the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations all have programs designed to promote Jewish identity and to lessen what they call assimilationand what is in reality mixing with non-Jewswhile at the same time claiming to promote individual liberties and human rights. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations is also openly set up to advance Jewish interests, and Jewish interests alone. To this end, they have the following member organizations: Alpha Epsilon Pi; Ameinu; American Friends of Likud; American Gathering/ Federation of Jewish Holocaust Survivors; American Israel Public Affairs Committee; American Jewish Committee; American Jewish Congress; American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee; American Sephardi Federation; American Zionist Movement; American-Israel Friendship League; Americans for Peace Now; AMIT; Anti-Defamation League; Association of Reform Zionists of America; Bnai Zion; Bnai Brith International; Central Conference of American Rabbis; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America; Development Corporation for Israel / State of Israel Bonds; Emunah of America; Friends of Israel Defense Forces; Hadassah, Womens Zionist Organization of America; Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society; Jewish Community Centers Association; Jewish Council for Public Affairs; Jewish Federations of North America; Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs; Jewish Labor Committee; Jewish National Fund; Jewish Reconstructionist Movement; Jewish Women International; MERCAZ USA, Zionist Organization of the Conservative Movement; National Council of Jewish Women; National Council of Young Israel; NAAMAT USA; NCSJ: Advocates on behalf of Jews in Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States & Eurasia; ORT America; Rabbinical Assembly; Rabbinical Council of America; Religious Zionists of America; Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem; Union for Reform Judaism; Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America; United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; Womens International Zionist Organization; Womens League for Conservative Judaism; Workmens Circle; World ORT; Zionist Organization of America; Cantors Assembly; Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life; Maccabi USA; and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association. There has been for many decades now a huge preponderance of Jews in high-level positions in the US government. On top of that there exists a vast, deep-pocketed Jewish-Zionist lobby apparatus in America which is relentlessly engaged in illegal bribing of US politicians and congressman to bolster support of Israel and the Zionist agenda. A few such treasonous organizations are: American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, Bnai Brith International among dozens of others. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations lists on its board of members 52 powerful Jewish groups in America alone that wield tremendous influence in American political life. Kevin MacDonald, a psychology professor at the University of California, Longbeach, noted: there are approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in the United States with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billiona sum greater than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations. According to sociologist James Petras book The Power of Israel in the United States, AIPAC alone has 60,000 wealthy members with an annual budget of $60,000,000. TheConference of Presidents of Major American Jewish OrganizationsAIPAC work together, with all members of the conference sitting on AIPACs executive committee, which is distinct from its board of directors. The two organizations follow a clear division of labor. The conference focuses on the executive branch of the U.S. government, while AIPAC lobbies in Congress. The conferences website states that it engages in consensus policy, collective action, and maximizing the resources of the American Jewish community, in particular, when events in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere affect the American Jewish community. The stated goals of the Conference are strengthening the special U.S.-Israel relationship; ensuring that Israels interests are understood by policy makers, opinion molders and the American public; addressing critical foreign policy issues that impact the American Jewish community; representing the interests of organized American Jewry; and protecting the security and dignity of Jews around the world. This then, is the real face of the Jewish lobby which Foxman and others claims does not even exist. It is the lobby which determines and controls which candidates get to stand for election, which election candidates get financial backing, which candidates get media coverageand ultimately, what the policies are of those who get to sit in the seats of power of Washington D.C. It is the true occupying force behind the government of the United States of America, and until it is overthrown, there will never be peace and stability anywhere in the world.

Fair Usage Law

June 18, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed

Jewish lobby – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term Jewish lobby is used to describe organized lobbying attributed to Jews on domestic and foreign policy decisions, as a political participant of representative government, conducted predominantly in the Jewish diaspora in a number of Western countries. While at times self-described,[citation needed] usage of the term is viewed as inaccurate,[citation needed] and, particularly when used to allege disproportionate Jewish influence, it can be perceived as pejorative or may constitute antisemitism.[citation needed] In his Dictionary of Politics (1992), Walter John Raymond describes the term “Jewish Lobby” as “A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the State of Israel.” He also notes that “[a]mong those organizations which are most actively involved in lobbying activities at federal, state and local levels of political and governmental institutions are: the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the American Jewish Committee… and the B’nai B’rith.”[1]Dominique Vidal, writing in Le Monde diplomatique, states that in the United States the term is “self-described” and it “is only one of many influence groups that have official standing with institutions and authorities.”[2] The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia states in its description, “It is important to recognise that lobbies are natural parts of pluralist, democratic societies such as Australia. Lobbying constitutes a mainstream method of influencing government policy, as a means of enhancing representative government. As such, just as other communities and interest groups have lobbies, there is a Jewish lobby an unwieldy group of individuals and organisations devoted to supporting the needs and interests of the Jewish community. This Jewish lobby is a player in representative government, and its very existence confirms the ordinary place Jews have within Australian politics. The assumption, however, that Jews have a disproportionate power and influence over decision making is what transforms a descriptive reality about politics to an antisemitic argument about Jewish power.”[3] Noting the high voting rate of individual American Jews in elections, J.J. Goldberg, editorial director of The Forward, stated in a 2004 speech that “The Jewish lobby… is actually more than just a dozen organizations. The Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, Hadassah, of course, AIPAC, but it is also the impact of the Jewish role. … So, the Jewish influence is a lot of things. It is the organizations, its the vote, its fundraising.”[4] Mitchell Bard, director of the non-profit Jewish Virtual Library, writes that: “Reference is often made to the ‘Jewish lobby’ in an effort to describe Jewish influence, but this term is both vague and inadequate. While it is true that American Jews are sometimes represented by lobbyists, such direct efforts to influence policy-makers are but a small part of the lobbys ability to shape policy.”[5] Bard argues the term Israel lobby is more accurate, because it comprises both formal and informal elements (which includes public opinion), and “…because a large proportion of the lobby is made up of non-Jews.”[6] In his 1987 work, The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy, Edward Tivnan states that the term “needed some fine-tuning; what was most at issue… was the influence of the ‘pro-Israel lobby.'”[7] In a letter to the editor of the New York Times Sunday Review of Books, responding to a review by Leslie Gelb of their 2007 book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,[8]University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Harvard University professor Stephen Walt write: “Gelb refers repeatedly to a ‘Jewish lobby,’ despite the fact that we never employ the term in our book. Indeed, we explicitly rejected this label as inaccurate and misleading, both because the lobby includes non-Jews like the Christian Zionists and because many Jewish Americans do not support the hard-line policies favored by its most powerful elements.”[9] The previous week, in a live Q&A session at The Washington Post, they stated they themselves “never use the term ‘Jewish lobby’ because the lobby is defined by its political agenda, not by religion or ethnicity.”[10] Robert S. Wistrich, of the International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, sees reference to the phrase, when used to describe an “all-powerful ‘Jewish Lobby’ that prevents justice in the Middle East”, as reliance on a classic antisemitic stereotype.[11] Bruno Bettelheim detested the term, arguing “The self-importance of Jews combined with the paranoia of the anti-Semite had created the image of this lobby.”[12] Michael Lasky describes the term as an “unfortunate phrase”, and “imagines” that Alexander Walker’s use of it while writing about the Nazi films of Leni Riefenstahl was not intended pejoratively.[13] The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission of Australia states that “the stereotype of the ‘Jewish lobby’ is that the Jewish engagement in politics and policy debate is above and beyond the ordinary participation of a group in public policy-making. It paints Jewish involvement as surreptitious, and as subverting the democratic process. It alleges that a ‘Jewish lobby’, through bribery, bullying and manipulation, pressures politicians to act against their will and duties.[14] Michael Visontay, editor of Australia’s The Sydney Morning Herald, wrote in 2003 that “The way the phrase ‘Jewish lobby’ has been bandied about in numerous letters implies there is something inherently sinister in lobbying when Jews do it.”[15] According to Geoffrey Brahm Levey and Philip Mendes, the term is used in Australia as a pejorative description of the way in which the Jewish community influences the Liberal Party “by talking to its leaders and making them aware of Jewish wishes and views”.[16] Dominique Schnapper, Chantal Bordes-Benayoun and Freddy Raphal write that following the 1991 Gulf War, the term “began to be heard in political life” in France.[17] Vidal writes that the term has been used there exclusively by the French far right as “a phrase that combines standard anti-semitic fantasies about Jewish finance, media control and power; the term is the contemporary equivalent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion”.[2]Loyola University Chicago professor Wiley Feinstein wrote in 2003 that “there is much talk of the ‘Jewish lobby’ in the Italian Press and in Europe”, describing the term as “a phrase[] of scorn for Jews and Judaism”.[18] William Safire wrote in 1993 that in the United Kingdom “Jewish lobby” is used as an “even more pejorative” term for “the ‘Israel lobby'”.[19] Susan Jacobs of Manchester Metropolitan University writes that the phrase “Jewish lobby”, when used “without mentioning other lobbies or differentiating Jews who have different political positions on a number of questions, including Israel and Palestine”, is a contemporary form of the fear of a Jewish conspiracy.[20] In a 2004 speech, Goldberg said, “There has been an awful lot of talk in the last few years about the rise of the Jewish lobby and the influence of the Jewish lobby. It used to be that you couldn’t talk about this sort of thing. When I wrote [the book] Jewish Power in 1996… I was accused by various Jewish lobbyists of inflating and buying into the old myths of international Jewish conspiracies simply by the use of the title.”[4] Goldberg disagrees with the sensitivity towards the use of the term, arguing that: “There is such a thing as a Jewish lobby, that the network of organizations that works together to put across what might be called the Jewish community’s view on world affairs is not insignificant, it’s not an invention, but it is not some sort of all-powerful octopus that its sometimes portrayed as these days.”[4] Mearsheimer and Walt wrote in 2006 that “even the Israeli media refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby'”,[21] and stated the following year that “AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents and the Israeli media themselves refer to America’s ‘Jewish Lobby’.”[22] After South African activist, Christian cleric, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu used it in a 1985 speech at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, a supporter wrote him privately urging him to avoid the phrase, stating it was “language… normally associated with the less than philo-Semitic elements of our acquaintance”.[23] Tutu used the phrase again in a 2002 editorial in The Guardian, stating “People are scared in this country [the US], to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful very powerful. Well, so what? For goodness sake, this is God’s world!”[24] This use was criticized by Melanie Phillips of the Daily Mail.[25] When he edited and reprinted parts of his speech in 2005, Tutu replaced the words “Jewish lobby” with “pro-Israeli lobby”.[26] In 2007, an invitation to Tutu to speak at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota was rescinded because of the speech; writing in Mother Jones, Justin Elliot stated “Tutu’s use of the phrase ‘Jewish lobby’ is regrettable, mainly because the pro-Israel lobby he is referring to is not made up exclusively of Jews, example Texas preacher John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel. But one minor slip five years ago is hardly grounds for blacklisting him.”[27] Chris Davies, MEP for the northwest of England was forced to resign in 2006 as leader of the Liberal Democrats group in the European Parliament after writing to a constituent I shall denounce the influence of the Jewish lobby that seems to have far too great a say over the political decision-making process in many countries.[28] In comments to TotallyJewish.Com he “confessed he didnt know the difference between referring to the ‘pro Israel lobby’ and the ‘Jewish lobby’,” and added Im quite prepared to accept that I dont understand the semantics of some of these things.[29] Commenting on Davies’ use of the term, David Hirsh of The Guardian wrote that Davies “had to resign because his laudable instinct to side with the underdog was not tempered by care, thought or self-education.” He compared Davies’ rhetoric with the “care to avoid openly antisemitic rhetoric taken by sophisticates like Mearsheimer and Walt and Robert Fisk.”[28] A 2007 editorial in The New York Sun accused Richard Dawkins, a British evolutionary biologist and writer, of repeating antisemitic conspiracy theories after he used the term in an interview published in The Guardian.[30] In the interview Dawkins said: “When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told – religious Jews anyway – than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.”[31] In a National Review column discussing the influence of “high-profile atheists” on the American left, Arthur C. Brooks wrote that Dawkins’ claim was “anti-Semitic, slanders religion, and asserts victimhood.”[32]David Cesarani, commenting in The Guardian, stated that “Mearsheimer and Walt would doubtless chide Dawkins for using the term ‘Jewish lobby’, which they studiously avoid in order to give no truck to anti-Jewish innuendo.”[33] In his book Jewish Power, Goldberg writes that in the United States the “Jewish lobby” for decades played a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self-interest. It was thrust into prominence following the Nixon Administration’s sharp shift of American policy towards significant military and foreign aid support for Israel following the 1973 Yom Kippur War.[34] Tivnan writes that a “full-fledged ‘Jewish lobby'” was developed in 1943, in which the moderates represented by Stephen Samuel Wise and the American Jewish Committee were defeated by supporters of Abba Hillel Silver and “the maximalist goal of a ‘Jewish Commonwealth'” at the American Jewish and Biltmore Conferences. Silver became the new leader of American Zionism, with his call for “loud diplomacy”, and he then “cranked up the Zionist Organization of America’s one-man lobbying operation in Washingtonrenaming it the American Zionist Emergency Council (AZEC)and began to mobilize American Jewry into a mass movement.”[35] Former New York Times journalist Youssef Ibrahim writes: “That there is a Jewish lobby in America concerned with the well-being of Israel is a silly question. It is insane to ask whether the 6 million American Jews should be concerned about the 6 million Israeli Jews, particularly in view of the massacre of another 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. It’s elementary, my dear Watson: Any people who do not care for their own are not worthy of concern. And what the Israel lobby does is what all ethnic lobbies Greek, Armenian, Latvian, Irish, Cuban, and others do in this democracy.”[36]

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Lobby  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."