Archive for the ‘Jewish Racism’ Category

Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud

Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud

– “Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII

The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as “Gentiles”, “Goyim”.

Let’s see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve’s “Chosen People”:

“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”

– Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”

– Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30

“Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.”

– Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

“A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.”

– Coschen hamischpat 405

“The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.”

– Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b

“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.”

– Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

“If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.”

– Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b

“If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.”

– Jore dea 377, 1

“Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.”

– Talmud Sanhedrin 74b

“It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.”

– Sepher ikkarim III c 25

“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”

– Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”

– Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b

“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.”

– Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

The Jews behind Islamophobia

Israel controls U.S. Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton…

The Victories of Revisionism By Professor Robert Faurisson

The Jewish hand behind Internet The Jews behind Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay…

“Jews, who want to be decent human beings, have to renounce being Jewish”

Jewish War Against Iran

Al Jazeera English under Jewish infiltration

Jewish hate against Christians By Prof. Israel Shahak

Introduction to Revisionist Thought – By Ernst Zndel

Karl Marx: The Jewish Question

Reel Bad Arabs – Revealing the racist Jewish Hollywood propaganda

“Anti-Semitism” – What is it?

Videos – Important collection

The Jews Banished 47 Times in 1000 Years – Why?

Nation of Islam and The Synagogue of Satan – Videos

The International Jew – By Henry Ford

Pravda interviews Ahmed Rami

Shahak’s “Jewish History”

The Jewish plan to destroy the Arab countries – From the World Zionist Organization

Judaism and Zionism inseparable

“Jewish History” – a bookreview

Revealing photos of the Jews

Racist Jewish Fundamentalism

“Jews” from Khazaria stealing the land of Palestine

The U.S. cost of supporting Israel

Turkey, Ataturk and the Jews

The truth about the Talmud

Israel and the Ongoing Holocaust in Congo

Jews DO control the media – a Jew brags! – Revealing Jewish article

Abbas – The Traitor

Protocols of Zion – The whole book!

Quotes – On Jewish Power / Zionism

Caricatures / Cartoons

See original here:

Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud

Fair Usage Law

September 1, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Jewish Racist Discrimination Against Better-Qualified …

By Dr. David Duke.

White Privilege or Jewish Privilege ?

The Jewish dominated media is constantly ranting about so-called white privilege in America, yet in the most important universities of America, the very institutions which form the very foundationof the American elite, non-Jewish European Americans are by far the most underrepresented group of all.

In fact, Jews are vastly over-represented by proportion of population and vastly over-represented over far better qualified non-Jewish students! Their over-representation Harvard and in the Ivy League is not only incredibly disproportionate against European American students, but also wildly disproportionate against every other racial group in America.

Above: Here is a chart showing the appalling lack of true diversity at Harvard and the Ivy League.Jews are dramatically over-represented in comparison with every ethnic/racial group in America. In comparison with European Americans, Jewsare almost 47 times more represented than their population would merit. Thats four thousand seven hundred percent over-represented in comparison with the actualpopulation of Jews and European Americans!

68 Percent of the population of America is European American allowed 20 percent of students.

Jews are 1.8 percent of college age Americans and given 25 percent of the admissions.

Even though European Americans founded Harvard, Americas most important university, and are almost 70 percent of the American population, the university is now under powerful Jewish influence, to the point that only about 20 percent of the students at Americas premier university are European Americans.(1)

Harvard and the Ivy Leaguepractice a blatant racist discrimination against better-qualified students and only allows Whites to make up 20 percent of the Harvard student bodyas compared to allotting 25 percent of it to Jews, who are only 1.8 percent of the American population.

It should be notedthat Jews are the most privileged by far of any other identifiable group in the United States by income and influence. Jewish studentsare also dramatically over-represented in comparison with Asians, Hispanics and African Americans as well as in comparison with European-descended students. So this Jewish privilege and preference is also over every non-Jewish group in America.

In fact as Ron Unz points out in the Myth of American Meritocracy, (2) Jewish racism is accelerating at Harvard. He documents that between 2000 and 2011, only the Jewish group increased in percentages at Harvard, while every other group fell. The Jewish increase of 35 percent was above an alreadyoutrageous Jewish over-representation.

So, in fact, Jews are the real kings of racist privilege in America, and this is especially true in the most important elite universities of America which admittedly are the primary source of the ruling elite of the American establishment.

European Americans who founded these great universities and who are 68 percent of the population, are the most discriminated against, of all groups, and dramatically so!

Some European American high level students harbor resentment against African American students for affirmative action discriminatory programs. Conservative politics in America is under the domination of Jewish neoconservatives and they carefully channel European American against African Americans and other races. However, the fact is thatdiscrimination against European American students, especially in the highest levels of academia, is far more likely to be on behalf of Jews than African-Americans.

Furthermore, the concept and implementation of affirmative action programs of racial discrimination were not initiated by African Americans, but by Jewish Supremacists.

Thereare, italso must be pointed out, other programs of discrimination against European Americans which have not been created and imposed by African-Americans, but by the Jewish Supremacists who enjoy the ultimate racist privilege in America.

Racist Discrimination Against Better Qualified Non-Jewish Students

Discrimination at Harvard is not simply demographic. Jewsat Harvardand across the Ivy Leagueare over-represented by the factor of 13 times higher numbers than their merit would justify!

Jewish over-representation has come about because of racial discrimination against better qualified European Americans and for less-qualified Jewish students.

The research of a Jewish authority, Ron Unz, demolishes the Jewish master race fantasy and his data proves that Jews are not only vastly over-represented by population in the elite universities like Harvard, but they are also vastly over-representedthan they deserve by merit.

Jews, who are less qualified in comparison with European Americans, are over-represented by a factor of more than 13 times higher than their merit would deserve, and almost 6 times over-represented than their abilitywould deserve against Asians.(3)

This is easilyproven by comparing groups of the top performing students of the United States with the National Merit Scholarships.One can simply compare the percentage of Jews who score in the highest levels inthe National Merit Scholarships compared to Gentile groups such as Asian, African, Hispanic and European-American performance on what is the best predictive gauge of student qualification and ability before college.

When one compares the Jewish and Gentile National Merit Scholarship qualifiers with the admissions to the top universities, one can easily judge the relationship between academic performance and actual university admission at Harvard and other schools.

Of course, there is one ultimate way to most accurately compare the relative ability of a group to perform well at Harvard or any elite educational institution: to simply examine how the groups compare in achievement after four years at the institution.

Demolishing The Myth of Jewish Intellectual Superiority

When one points out that Jews are vastly over-represented compared to other groups in the elite universities, in Media, in banking and among top government administrators, theJewish media constantly presents images of Jews as intellectually superior in comparison with other people.

The Jewish dominated media constantly produces images of brilliant, Einstein-like Jews and produce constant images that Jews have asuperior work ethic than non-Jews.

If one dares to point out thevast Jewish domination of academia or of any part of society, the counter-argument is that Jews are just smarter than anyone else.

The suggestion is that Jews are dominant at Harvard and the Ivy League, or for that matter in Hollywood or banking is because they are themost capable and that they earned it through their merit.

If this argument were valid, it would have to prove they were indeed markedly smarter, work harder, and just as importantly, that higher performing Jewswould outnumber their Gentile competitors on a per-capita basis and in actual numbers.

Of course, that idea is ludicrous when you look at the tiny percentage of Jews in America. Even if the performance levels of Asians and European Americans wereless on average than Jews, the reality is that there are many more non-Jews than Jews. The only rational explanation for this difference would be that other factors are responsible for the Jewish dominance in academia.

In fact, the best gauge of a groups ability to perform well in an elite university is not how they perform on a preparatory test or even in past academic performance, but to simply look at the performance of those respective groups at the completion of their studies.

There is a simple and elegant way to determine the best performing students. It is called Phi Beta Kappa, the premier honors society of academic excellence in America.

Phi Beta Kappa recipients at Harvardmake upabout the top ten percent of students. It is based on an extremely high grade point average of 3.75 (out of 4) and a rigorous Arts and Sciences curriculum, the inclusion of advanced math classes and foreign language proficiency.

As pointed out previously, European American students are markedly outnumbered by Jewish students at Harvard. European-Americans are just 20 percent of the Harvard students as compared to Jews, who are 25 percent.

The numerical disadvantage to European Americans is like a basketball team limited to 4 players which must compete against a Jewish team with 5 players.

Yet,what percentage of total Phi Beta Kappa recipients at Harvard are European Americans, and what percentage are Jews?

Jews 11 percent European Americans 54 percent Asian Americans 35 percent

Jews greatly outnumber European Americans at Harvard, but are only 11 percent of Phi Beta Kappa achievers. (4)

The numerically fewer European Americans occupy 54 percent of the Phi Beta Kappa positions.

On a per capita basis, European Americans are more than 5 times (500 percent) as likely to achieve Phi Beta Kappa status and the highest academic achievements at Harvard as are Jewish students.

Harvard is the elite university of America. Even though its administration is dominated by Jewish administrators and faculty, and although Jewish students outnumber European Americans Jews achieve the elite Phi Beta Kappa status at a small fraction of White students.

Consideringthat the Harvard administration permits European Americans to beonly 20 percent of the Harvard student body,it indicates that huge numbers of European Americans of the highest abilities are facing racist discrimination at Harvard, in the Ivy League, and other Jewish-dominated elite universities.

So who is Behind the Jewish Supremacism at Harvard

The clear racial discrimination shown here against European Americans, Asians and others on behalf of Jewish students, begs the question of how and why.

The conclusion is inescapable.

There is a clear Jewish domination of the faculty and staff of Harvard University and the rest of the Ivy League.

Using their positions of power they have systematically and deliberately discriminated against non-Jews in both admissions and faculty hires, and once they achieved their supremacy over these institutions they have protected and maintained their power.

Jewish supremacist racism surrounding the appointment and tenure of the Harvard Law School, by far the most important Law School in the United States, illustrates the dynamics of Jewish Supremacism.

Elana Kagan, now a Supreme Court justice, was appointed to Dean of Harvard Law School by the Jewish President at the time, Lawrence Summers. Kaganwent on to give over 50 percent of her faculty appointments at the most important, the pinnacle law school in America, to her fellow Jewish tribalists.(5)

Under Dean Kagan, Jews, who are only 2 percent of the adult population of America, received over 50% of faculty appointments.

It is simple math to show Kagans massive discrimination against non-Jews resulted in a 2,400 percent over-representation in her appointments compared to the Jewish percentage of population.

Her Harvard law position and Jewish tribal alliances and influence in politics enabled her to become what must be one of the most under-qualified appointments to the Supreme Court in its history. She joined two other Jews on the Supreme Court tomake up part of a vast Jewish over-representation on that critical body.

Is there any sound reason that her decisions on the Supreme Court will not reflect her Jewish allegiances as reflected in hertenure at Harvard?

The clear facts of Jewish racism and discrimination at the highest echelons of academia at Harvard and in the Ivy League would suggest that the dominance of Hollywood, banking, and political organizations could all be similarly influencedby this Jewishracism of Jewish preference and privilege and accompanied by racial discrimination against those not chosen.

What is the mechanism of theJewish takeover of academia?

There aretwo critical components of the Jewish takeover of academia in America. The primary mechanismthe aforementioned Jewish tribalism in which Jews often support fellow Jews in the same way Kagan gave 50 percent of her appointments to fellow Jews.

The second is the structure of college admissions in America in which Diversity is now the key word in college admissions. At Harvard the impact of diversity can be seen in the fact that some Harvard applicants who have perfect high school records in excellent schools and perfect SAT entrance examinations are not admitted in favor of students with far worse academic records and far lower test scores.

Universities are now evaluating the personality and intangible qualities of individual students. Of course, universities are supposed to selecting the students who are best at academic and intellectualperformance the same way that athletes are selected for athletic performance.

In the name of diversity then, academic credentials, abilities, and performance can take a back seat to the intangibles. In the interviews and the selection process then personal prejudices and bias of the administrators can play a huge role in selection because there isno longer any objectivity based on testing and prior performance. Now a critical factor is the subjectivity of the administrators doing the admissions process.

This is why Jews havean incredible13 times, or 1,300 percent over-representation than their actual academic merit would allow.

In the name of diversity academic performance is put in the back seat, and Jewish administrators are free to select fellow Jews for admissions, graduate programs and academic appointments such as in the Kagan case.

Of course, diversity is the idea that institutions should reflect the diversity of the underlying population and demographics of the region or nation and that there should be fair and equitable representation.

What kind of diversity gives one group massive over-representation andall other groups massive under-representation, with the largest population segment of the United States the smallest proportion of representation.

That is the greatest irony of all. In the name of diversity, America has its elite selected by group that is only 2 percent of the population and gives its owngroup a massive over-representation in the universities that are the source of the American elite.

This is the real privilege in America. It is not White Privilege when 96 percent of the White populationare discriminated against in favor of a select 4 percent. When the 70 percent White population who has more than 70 percent of the most outstanding students in America are accorded only 20 percent of Harvard and Ivy League admissions.

Postscript: NY Times Boasts ofthe Jewish Takeover of America

The most prominent NY Times Columnist, David Brooks, wrote a column called The Chosen, Getting In. The article talksabout a book by a Jewish Professor James Karabel who a book called The Chosen, which discusses the Jewish takeover of the Ivy League.

In the first paragraph of the article, Brooks talks about his giving a lecture on the substance of Karabels book. He points out that after his speech an obviously Jewish woman came up to him and said, What you are talking about it the Jewish takeover of America. Here is an excerpt from my new book, The Illustrated Protocols of Ziondue outlater this year:

One thing about many Jews, in their chutzpah they just cant help but boast. I am glad he does, for he is telling the truth.

The Jews, just 2 percent of the American population, have taken over American academia and the American elite. They have taken over not because this 2 percent has a majority of the intelligence in America.

They are respectably intelligent, but their weapon of conquest is not their cleverness, but their their ultra-racism and their racial discrimination. Those are the devices their elite has used to depose the European American elite that created America, the American academia,and who today oppress not just European Americans but all Americans who dont want to ruled over by a alien, racist oligarchy.

If ethnic oppression and exploitation is immoral, then should we not rise up, all of us, and free ourselves from this racist, Jewish supremacism?

Endingthisracist suppression is not only important for European Americans but for all Americans of every race and ethnicity.

Dr. David Duke2014

Sources:

(1) Harvard enrollment for the class entering 2010: Asian 16% Black non-Hispanic 7% Hispanic 8% International 10% Mixed 3% Unknown 12% Jewish 24% White non-Hispanic Non-Jewish 19% Sources: Harvard Provost Office: Degree Student Enrollment, 2010, Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life ).

(2)Unz, Ron: The Myth of American Meritocracy: How corrupt are Ivy League admissions? The American Conservative, November 28, 2012.

(3)Unz, Ron: The Myth of American Meritocracy: Quantitative Sources and Methods, The American Conservative website, Appendix G, November 21, 2012).

(4) Ibid.

(5)Slattery, Patrick: Elena Kagans diversity problem and Jewish privilege The Occidental Observer, September 2, 2012).

Excerpt from:

Jewish Racist Discrimination Against Better-Qualified …

Fair Usage Law

July 1, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Menorah Lighting at White House:Celebrating Jewish Racism …

The now annual lighting this week of a giant menorah in front of the White House symbolizes not only the power grab made by Jewish Supremacists over the United States, but also their controlled mass medias deliberate suppression of the facts around Hanukah.

The Jewish Supremacists who control the mass media like to pretend that Hanukkah is simply some sort of Jewish version of Christmas.

Hanukkah is actually a celebration of Jewish racism, Jewish supremacy and Jewish separatism. It commemorates the radical Jewish Maccabees mass murder of Greeks and Syrians as well as Jews who dared to assimilate and be tolerant of one another. It is actually a Jewish religious and historical symbol of Jewish dedication to non-Assimilation with non-Jews!

The celebrated even concerns the theMaccabean Revoltagainst theMacedonian-ruled Seleucid Empireof the 2nd century BC.

Seleucid Empire king Antiochus IV Epiphanes (c. 215 BC 164 BC), having experienced trouble with the Hebrews within his empires borders, mistakenly thought that fully accepting Jews into Greek institutions and promoting marriage and assimilation between Greeks and Jews would help prevent the terrorism and violence of Jewish radical sects. Actually the Greek willingness to assimilate and willingness of many Jews to assimilate only inflamed the Jewish radicals even more.

Some Jews went along with this assimilation process, but many extremists among that communitysome sources say the majorityopposed it.

offer offer a sacrifice to an idol.

Mattathias sonJudah Maccabeethen gathered together a Jewish army and, after a protracted terrorist campaign, was victorious over first the Hellenized Jews and then Seleucid forces.

After the Maccabees entered Jerusalem in triumph and ritually cleansed theTemple, they re-established traditionalJewish worship there. According to the story, the victorious Maccabees could only find a small jug of oil that enough to sustain thelit Menorahfor one day, but it lasted for eight days, by which time further oil could be procuredhence the lighting ceremony of the menorah which forms a major processional part of the celebration.

A large Seleucid army was sent to quash the revolt, but returned to Syria on the death of Antiochus IV. Its commander Lysias, preoccupied with internal Seleucid affairs, agreed to a political compromise that restored religious freedom and the dispute ended.

The important point here is that the festival of Hanukah actually celebrates Jewish separatism and a victorious Jewish campaign against assimilationnot a season of gifts or goodwill, as the media pretends.

The lighting of the menorah in front of the White House in actual fact is celebrating the halting of intermarriage and assimilation.

Imagine for a second any religion publicly celebrating its desire to be spateand then getting the White House to endorse it!

At the same time, the Jewish Supremacists who publicly celebrate their separateness in this way, are the forefront of telling everyone else to integrate.

One law for the Jewish Supremacists, one law for the Gentiles.

More:

Menorah Lighting at White House:Celebrating Jewish Racism …

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Racism in Israel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Racism in Israel refers to all forms and manifestations of racism experienced in Israel, irrespective of the colour or creed of the perpetrator and victim, or their citizenship, residency, or visitor status.

More specifically in the Israeli context, however, racism in Israel refers to racism directed against Israeli Arabs by Israeli Jews,[1] intra-Jewish racism between the various Jewish ethnic divisions (in particular against Ethiopian Jews,[2] and to historic current racism towards Mizrahi Jews and Jews of colour), and racism on the part of Israeli Arabs against Israeli Jews.

Racism on the part of Israeli Jews against Muslim Arabs in Israel exist in institutional policies, personal attitudes, the media, education, immigration rights, housing,[3] social life and legal policies. Some elements within the Ashkenazi Israeli Jewish population have also been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards fellow Jews of other backgrounds, including against Ethiopian Jews, Indian Jews, Mizrahi Jews, Sephardi Jews, etc. Although intermarriage between Ashkenazim and Sephardim/Mizrahim is increasingly common in Israel, and social integration is constantly improving, disparities continue to persist. Ethiopian Jews in particular have faced discrimination from non-Black Jews. It has been suggested that the situation of the Ethiopian Jews as ‘becoming white’ is similar to that of some European immigrants like Poles and Italians who arrived in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.[4]

Israel has broad anti-discrimination laws that prohibit discrimination by both government and nongovernment entities on the basis of race, religion, and political beliefs, and prohibits incitement to racism.[5] The Israeli government and many groups within Israel have undertaken efforts to combat racism. Israel is a state-party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and is a signatory of the Convention against Discrimination in Education. Israel’s President Reuven Rivlin announced to a meeting of academics in October 2014 that it is finally time for Israel to live up to its promise as a land of equality, time to cure the epidemic of racism. “Israeli society is sick, and it is our duty to treat this disease,” Rivlin stated.[6]

According to Sammy Smooha, a Professor of Sociology at the University of Haifa, the answer to the question of whether racism exists in Israel depends on the definition of racism adopted. If Pierre L. van den Berghe’s view is adopted, that the term racism must be restricted to beliefs that a given biological race is superior, then ethnocentrism can be found in Israel, but not racism. According to other definitions, racism is a belief that membership in a certain group, not necessarily genetic or biological, determines the qualities of individuals. By this definition, racist views are present in portions of the Israeli population.[7] Smooha adds that some Arab and Jewish writers make accusations of racism, but they use the term in a very loose way.[7]

A report written by the Israeli Foreign Ministry describes Israel as a multi-ethnic, multicultural, multi-religious, and multi-lingual society, which has a high level of informal segregation patterns. The report states that groups are not separated by official policy, but that Israel has a number of different sectors within the society are somewhat segregated and maintain their strong cultural, religious, ideological, and/or ethnic identity. The report maintains that in spite of the existing social cleavages and economic disparities, the political systems and the courts represent strict legal and civic equality. The Israeli Foreign Ministry describes the country as “Not a melting pot society, but rather more of a mosaic made up of different population groups coexisting in the framework of a democratic state”[8]

Racism against Arabs on the part of the Israeli state and some Israeli Jews has been identified by critics in personal attitudes, the media, education, immigration rights, housing segregation, and social life. Nearly all such characterizations have been denied by the state of Israel. The Or Commission, set up to explain the October 2000 unrest in many Israeli Arab communities found,

“The state and generations of its government failed in a lack of comprehensive and deep handling of the serious problems created by the existence of a large Arab minority inside the Jewish state. Government handling of the Arab sector has been primarily neglectful and discriminatory. The establishment did not show sufficient sensitivity to the needs of the Arab population, and did not take enough action in order to allocate state resources in an equal manner. The state did not do enough or try hard enough to create equality for its Arab citizens or to uproot discriminatory or unjust phenomenon.”[9]

According to the 2004 U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for Israel and the Occupied Territories, the Israeli government had done “little to reduce institutional, legal, and societal discrimination against the country’s Arab citizens.”[10] The 2005 US Department of State report on Israel wrote: “[T]he government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas, including… institutional, legal, and societal discrimination against the countrys Arab citizens.”[11] The 2010 U.S. State Department Country Report stated that Israeli law prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, and that government effectively enforced these prohibitions.[12] Former Likud MK and Minister of Defense Moshe Arens has criticized the treatment of minorities in Israel, saying that they did not bear the full obligation of Israeli citizenship, nor were they extended the full privileges of citizenship.[13]

Israel is a state-party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. According to the 1998 Report of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination found that the Convention “is far from fully implemented in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and that the shortfall contributes very significantly to the dangerous escalation of tension in the region.”. The report positively noted the measures taken by Israel to prohibit the activities of racist political parties, the amendment of the Equal Opportunity in Employment Law, prohibiting discrimination in the labour sphere on the grounds of national ethnic origin, country of origin, beliefs, political views, political party, affiliation or age, and the Israeli efforts to reduce and eventually eradicate the economic and educational gap between the Jewish majority and the Arab minority.[14]

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) published reports documenting racism in Israel, and the 2007 report suggested that anti-Arab racism in the country was increasing. One analysis of the report summarized it thus: “Over two-thirds Israeli teens believe Arabs to be less intelligent, uncultured and violent. Over a third of Israeli teens fear Arabs all together….The report becomes even grimmer, citing the ACRI’s racism poll, taken in March 2007, in which 50% of Israelis taking part said they would not live in the same building as Arabs, will not befriend, or let their children befriend Arabs and would not let Arabs into their homes.”[15] The 2008 report from ACRI says the trend of increasing racism is continuing.[16] An Israeli minister charged the poll as biased and not credible.[17] The Israeli government spokesman responded that the Israeli government was “committed to fighting racism whenever it raises it ugly head and is committed to full equality to all Israeli citizens, irrespective of ethnicity, creed or background, as defined by our declaration of independence”.[17] Isi Leibler of the Jerusalem Center for Public affairs argues that Israeli Jews are troubled by “increasingly hostile, even treasonable outbursts by Israeli Arabs against the state” while it is at war with neighboring countries,[18]

Another 2007 report, by the Center Against Racism, also found hostility against Arabs was on the rise. Among its findings it reported that 75% of Israeli Jews don’t approve of Arabs and Jews sharing apartment buildings; that over half of Jews wouldn’t want to have an Arab boss and that marrying an Arab amounts to “national treason”; and that 55% of the sample thought Arabs should be kept separate from Jews in entertainment sites. Half wanted the Israeli government to encourage Israeli Arabs to emigrate. About 40% believed Arab citizens should have their voting rights removed.[19]

A March 2010 poll by Tel Aviv University found that 49.5% of Israeli Jewish high school students believe Israeli Arabs should not be entitled to the same rights as Jews in Israel. 56% believe Arabs should not be eligible to the Knesset, the Israeli parliament.[20]

An October 2010 poll by the Dahaf polling agency found that 36% of Israeli Jews favor eliminating voting rights for non-Jews.[21] In recent polling (20032009) between 42% and 56% of Israelis agreed that “Israeli Arabs suffer from discrimination as opposed to Jewish citizens;” 80% of Israeli Arabs agreed with that statement in 2009.[22]

A 2012 poll revealed widespread support among Israeli Jews for discrimination against Israeli Arabs.[23]

In November 2014, after two Arabs from East Jerusalem perpetrated a massacre in a Jerusalem synagogue by using axes, knives, and a gun, the mayor of Ashkelon, Itamar Shimoni, announced that he planned to fire city construction workers who were Arab. His action brought a storm of protest from politicians as well as the prime minister and president. Police in Ashkelon said they would ignore Shimoni’s directive and “obey the law.”[24]Nir Barkat, mayor of Jerusalem, said “We cannot discriminate the Arabs,” and added “I cannot help but think of where we were 70 years ago in Europe. We cannot generalize as they did to Jews. Here in Jerusalem, we have tens of thousands of Arab workers. We must make a clear distinction.”[25] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said “We should not discriminate against an entire public because of a small minority that is violent and militant.” Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz said it is “sad that relations between Jews and Arabs will suffer because of some Jihadist fanatical terrorists.” He said that on the one hand “one can understand the fear of parents of kindergarten children afraid someone will take a knife one day, as happened in the synagogue in Jerusalem, shout ‘Allah Akhbar’ and begin to attack.” On the other hand, he said, “this is something that should be handled while keeping the generally good relations between Jews and Arabs.”[26] In spite of the almost universal condemnation of Shimoni’s plan by Israeli politicians, a poll by Channel 10 showed that 58% of Israelis support the discriminatory practice, 32% did not approve and 10% did not know.[27] At the end the mayor changed his mind. Yehiel Lasri, mayor of nearby Ashdod, allegedly targeted Arab workers for extra security checks.[28]

Some authors, such as David Hirsi and Ayala Emmet, have criticized the Israeli media for portraying Arabs negatively.[29][30] The Israeli media has been described as “racist” in its portrayals of Israeli-Arabs and Palestinians by Israeli-Arab Nabilia Espanioly [31]

Israel is a signatory of the Convention against Discrimination in Education, and ratified it in 1961. The convention has the status of law in Israeli courts.[32] Israeli Pupils Rights Law of 2000 prohibits discrimination of students for sectarian reasons in admission to or expulsion from educational institutions, in establishment of separate educational curricula or holding of separate classes in the same educational institution.[33]

According to a 2001 report by Human Rights Watch, Israel’s school systems for Arab and Jewish children are separate and have unequal conditions to the disadvantage of the Arab children who make up one quarter of all students. Israeli law does not prohibit Palestinian Arab parents from enrolling their children in Jewish schools, but in practice, very few Palestinian Arab parents do so.[32][34] The report stated that “Government-run Arab schools are a world apart from government-run Jewish schools. In virtually every respect, Palestinian Arab children get an education inferior to that of Jewish children, and their relatively poor performance in school reflects this.”[35][36][37] In 1999, in an attempt to close the gap between Arab and Jewish education sectors, the Education Minister of Israel announced an affirmative action policy which promised that Arabs would be granted 25% of the education budget, proportionally more funding than their 18% of the population, and supported the creation of an Arab academic college.[38]

A 2009 study from the Hebrew University’s School of Education demonstrated that the Israeli Education Ministry’s budget for special assistance to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds “severely” discriminated against Arabs. The study found that because there were more needy Arab students, but fewer Arab students overall, educationally needy Jewish students receive anywhere from 3.8 to 6.9 times as much funding as equally needy Arab students. The Education Ministry said in response to the report that a decision has already been made to abandon this allocation method.[39] The Follow-Up Committee for Arab Education notes that the Israeli government spends an average of $192 per year on each Arab student compared to $1,100 per Jewish student. The drop-out rate for Arab citizens of Israel is twice as high as that of their Jewish counterparts (12 percent versus 6 percent). The same group also notes that there is a 5,000-classroom shortage in the Arab sector.[40][verification needed]

A 2007 report of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination noted that separate sectors are maintained for Jewish and Arab education. It recommended that Israel should assess the extent to which maintenance of separate Arab and Jewish sectors “may amount to racial segregation”, and that mixed Arab-Jewish communities and schools, and intercultural education should be promoted.[41] In a 2008 report, Israel responded that parents are entitled to enroll their children in the educational institution of their choice, whether the spoken language is Hebrew, Arabic or bilingual. It also noted that Israel promotes a variety of programs that promote intercultural cooperation, tolerance and understanding [34][42]

In Palestine in Israeli School Books: Ideology and Propaganda in Education, Nurit Peled-Elhanan, a professor of language and education at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, describes the depiction of Arabs in Israeli schoolbooks as racist. She states that their only representation is as refugees, primitive farmers and terrorists, claiming that in “hundreds and hundreds” of books, not one photograph depicted an Arab as a “normal person”.[43] Arnon Groiss of the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace criticized these findings. After reviewing the same books examined by Peled-Ehanan, Groiss concluded that “Peled-Ehanan’s claim regarding this point is clearly false … This heavily politicized and thus biased approach distorts the material to produce a picture to her liking.” Groiss further criticized the work of Peled-Elhanan for stretching the definition of racism to include cases that researchers would normally categorize as ethnocentrism.[44]

The Jewish National Fund is a private organization established in 1901 to buy and develop land in the Land of Israel for Jewish settlement; land purchases were funded by donations from world Jewry exclusively for that purpose.[45]

Discrimination has been claimed regarding ownership and leasing of land in Israel, because approximately 13% of Israel’s land, owned by the Jewish National Fund, is restricted to Jewish ownership and tenancy, and Arabs are prevented from buying or leasing that land.[46]

In the early 2000s, several Community settlement in the Negev and the Galilee were accused of barring Arab applicants from moving in. In 2010, the Knesset passed legislation that allowed admissions committees to function in smaller communities in the Galilee and the Negev, while explicitly forbidding committees to bar applicants based on the basis of race, religion, sex, ethnicity, disability, personal status, age, parenthood, sexual orientation, country of origin, political views, or political affiliation.[47][48] Critics, however, say the law gives the privately run admissions committees a wide latitude over public lands, and believe it will worsen discrimination against the Arab minority.[49]

Some critics of Israel equate Zionism with racism, or describe Zionism itself as racist or discriminatory.[51] In 1975, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 3379, which concluded that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”[52][53] During debate on the resolution, U.S. ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan argued that Zionism “clearly is not a form of racism,” defining racism as “an ideology… which favors discrimination on the grounds of alleged biological differences.”[54] The resolution was based on the UN’s own definition of racial discrimination, adopted in 1965. According to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, racial discrimination is “any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.”[55]

The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. Speaking to the General Assembly, George H. W. Bush said “…to equate Zionism with the intolerable sin of racism is to twist history and forget the terrible plight of Jews in World War II and indeed throughout history.”

Supporters of Zionism, such as Chaim Herzog, argue that the movement is non-discriminatory and contains no racist aspects.[50]

Some critics have described the Law of Return, which allows all Jews and persons of some Jewish descent to immigrate to Israel as racist, as Palestinian refugees are not eligible for citizenship.[56]Palestinians and advocates for Palestinian refugee rights criticize the Law of Return, which they compare to the Palestinian claim to a right of return.[57] These critics consider the Law, as contrasted against the denial of the right of Palestinian refugees to return, as offensive and as institutionalized ethnic discrimination.[58]

Supporters of the Law argue that it is consistent with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Article I(3) which allows for preferential treatments of some groups for purpose of immigration, provided there is no discrimination against a specific nationality.[59][60][61]

In addition, proponents of the law point out that in addition to Israel, several other countries provide immigration privileges to individuals with ethnic ties to these countries. Examples include Germany,[62]Serbia, Greece, Japan, Turkey, Ireland, Russia, Italy, Spain, Chile, Poland and Finland[61] (See Right of return and Repatriation laws.) Some supporters noted that the decision by the Venice Commission recognized the relationship between ethnic minorities and their kin-states as legitimate and even desirable, and preference in immigration and naturalization is mentioned as an example of legitimate preference.[61]

In response to Arab criticism of Israel’s Law of Return as discriminatory in a 1975 United Nations resolution debate, Israelis argued that Palestinian Israelis were not subject to any legal discrimination.[54]

In 2010 the Israeli cabinet proposed an amendment to the Citizenship Act requiring all future non-Jews applying for Israeli citizenship to swear loyalty to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. The proposal met harsh criticism, including accusations of racism, and subsequently it was amended to make the loyalty oath universal to both Jewish and non-Jewish naturalized citizens. Even in this new form, the bill did not pass due to lack of majority support in the Israeli parliament.[63][64][65][66][66][67]

Israel’s Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law bars immigration by family reunification to couples of an Israeli citizen and a Palestinian resident of the Israeli-occupied territories. Amnesty International says this mostly affects Arabs.[68][69] The law has been condemned by Amnesty International as “racial discrimination”.[70] The government says the law say it is aimed at preventing terrorist attacks. Some leaders of the Kadima party support the law in order to preserve the state’s Jewish character. Mishael Cheshin, one of supreme court judges who upheld the law, wrote that “at a time of war the state could prevent the entry of enemy subjects to its territory even if they were married to citizens of the state”.[71]

Rabbi David Batzri and his son Yitzhak were investigated by police after they made racist remarks against Arabs and protested against a mixed Arab-Jewish school in Jerusalem.[72][73] As part of a 2008 plea bargain, Yitzhak was sentenced to community service, and David issued a declaration saying he was opposed to any racist incitement and said that he calls for love, brotherhood and friendship.[74]

Dov Lior, Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba in the southern West Bank and head of the “Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria” issued a religious edict saying “a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew’s fingernail”[75][76][77] and stated that captured Arab terrorists could be used to conduct medical experiments,[78] and also ruled that Jewish Law forbids employing Arabs or renting homes to them.[79][80] Lior denied holding racist views.[81] In June 2011 the Rabbi was arrested by Israeli police and questioned on suspicion of inciting violence.[82][83] Both opposition leader Tzipi Livni and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a full judicial investigation of Lior’s remarks and said that rabbis were not above the law.[84]

In October 2010, Ovadia Yosef, a former Sephardi chief rabbi, stated that the sole purpose of non-Jews “is to serve Jews”.[85] His statement was harshly condemned by several Jewish organizations.[86][87]

On 7 Dec 2010, a group of 50 state-paid rabbis signed a letter instructing Orthodox Jews not to rent or sell houses to non-Jews. The letter was later endorsed by some 250 other Jewish religious figures. A hotline was opened for denouncing those Jews who did intend to rent out to Arabs.[88][89]

On 19 Dec 2010, a rally attended by 200 people was held in Bat Yam against the “assimilation” of young Jewish women with Arabs. One of the organizers, “Bentzi” Ben-Zion Gopstein, said that the motives are not racist: “It is important to explain that the problem is religious, not racist. If my son were to decide to marry an Arab woman who converted, I wouldn’t have a problem with that. My problem is the assimilation that the phenomenon causes.” One of the protestors called out, “Any Jewish woman who goes with an Arab should be killed; any Jew who sells his home to an Arab should be killed.” Bat Yam Mayor Shlomo Lahyani condemned the event, saying “The city of Bat Yam denounces any racist phenomenon. This is a democratic country,”. Nearby, about 200 residents of Bat Yam held a counter protest, waving signs reading, “We’re fed up with racists” and “Jews and Arabs refuse to be enemies”. Later that month, the wives of 27 rabbis signed a letter calling on Jewish girls to stay away from Arab men. The document stated: “Don’t date them, don’t work where they work and don’t perform National Service with them.”[90][91][92]

A senior Catholic spokesman, Fr Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Custodian of the Holy Land, has claimed that a lack of police action, and an educational culture in which Jewish pupils are encouraged to act with “contempt” towards Christians, has resulted in life becoming increasingly “intolerable” for many Christians. In 2012, pro-settler extremists attacked a Trappist monastery in the town of Latroun covering walls with anti-Christian graffiti denouncing Christ as a “monkey”, and the 11th century Monastery of the Cross was daubed with offensive slogans such as “Death to Christians”. According to an article in the Telegraph, Christian leaders feel that the most important issue that Israel has failed to address is the practice of some ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools to teach children that it is a religious obligation to abuse anyone in Holy Orders they encounter in public, “such that Ultra-Orthodox Jews, including children as young as eight, spit at members of the clergy on a daily basis.”[93] Incidents of spitting on Christian clergymen in Jerusalem have been common since the 1990s.[94][95] Ruling on the case of a Greek Orthodox priest who had struck a yeshiva student who spat near him in 2011, a Jerusalem magistrate wrote, “Day after day, clergymen endure spitting by members of those fringe groups a phenomenon intended to treat other religions with contempt. … The authorities are not able to eradicate this phenomenon and they don’t catch the spitters, even though this phenomenon has been going on for years.”[96]

In 1994, a Jewish settler in the West Bank and follower of the Kach party, Baruch Goldstein, massacred 29 Palestinian Muslim worshipers at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron.[97][98] During his funeral, a rabbi declared that even one million Arabs are “not worth a Jewish fingernail”.[99][100][101] Goldstein was immediately “denounced with shocked horror even by the mainstream Orthodox”,[102] and many in Israel classified Goldstein as insane.[103] The Israeli government condemned the massacre and made Kach illegal.[104] The Israeli army killed a further nine Palestinians during riots following the massacre,[105] and the Israeli government severely restricted Palestinian freedom of movement in Hebron,[106] while letting settlers and foreign tourists roam free,[107] although Israel also forbade certain Israeli settlers from entering Palestinian towns and demanded that those settlers turn in their army-issued rifles.[108] Goldstone’s grave has become a pilgrimage site for Jewish extremists.[109]

In 2006, a stabbing incident took place when a gang of Russian immigrants chanting racist slogans stabbed and lightly injured Arab Knesset member Abbas Zakour, which was part of a “stabbing rampage” and was described as a “hate crime”.[114]

The Mossawa Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel reported a tenfold increase in racist incidents against Arabs in 2008.[115] Jerusalem reported the highest number of racist incidents against Arabs.[115] The report blamed Israeli leaders for the violence, saying “These attacks are not the hand of fate, but a direct result of incitement against the Arab citizens of this country by religious, public, and elected officials.”[115] The Bedouin claim they face systemic discrimination and have submitted a counter-report to the United Nations that disputes the Israeli government’s official state report.[116] They claim they are not treated as equal citizens in Israel and that Bedouin towns are not provided the same level of services or land that Jewish towns of the same size are, and that they are not given fair access to water.[116] The city of Beersheba refused to recognize a Bedouin holy site, despite a High Court recommendation.[116]

In late 2010, the number of racist incidents against Arabs increased. The events were described by the Defense Minister of Israel, Ehud Barak, as a “wave of racism.”[117] The most notable ones took place on 20 December 2010, when a group of five Arabs were driven from an apartment in Tel Aviv after their landlady was threatened with the torching of her home if she continued to rent out to Arabs,[118] and on 21 December 2010, when a gang of Jewish youths was arrested in Jerusalem after carrying out a large number of attacks on Arabs. A girl aged 14 would lure Arab men to the Independence Park, where they were attacked with stones and bottles and severely beaten. The teens confessed to nationalistic motives.[119] On 31 Oct 2010, a Jewish mob gathered outside of an Arab students’ residence in Safed, chanted “death to the Arabs,” hurled rocks and bottles at the building, shattering glass, and fired a shot at the building before dissassembling.[120]

On May 2011, two Israeli border patrolmen were charged with physical abuse against an Arab minor who was carrying firecrackers. The incident took place in March 2010. The youth was punched, knocked to the floor, kicked, and had death threats thrown against him by the officers. At a police station, the 17-year-old male was tricked by a female police officer into believing he was going to die. After making the prisoner go down on his knees, she allegedly pointed her pistol at him at point-blank range. It was not loaded, but the minor did not know this because his eyes were covered. According to the charges, she counted to 10, with the teen begging her not to kill him. She allegedly pulled the trigger, saying “Death to Arabs.” [121] She was later sentenced to 3 months in prison. [122]

In March 2012, two Arab males of Beit Zarzir confessed, after being arrested, to damaging a local school for Arab and Jewish students. They admitted responsibility for having sprayed on the wall of the school, “Death to Arabs”. The school was sprayed twice in February with the slogans “price tag,” “Death to Arabs, and” “Holocaust to the Arabs”.[123][124][125][126]

On November 18, 2013, Jewish settlers torched trucks and spray-painted walls in a Palestinian village. Two perpetrators, Yehuda Landsberg and Yehuda Sabir, admitted their guilt and received the minimum sentence. Binyamin Richter, a third defendant, claimed innocence. They are from Havat Gilad.[127] This was the first time that any indictments were issued against the 52 Jewish Israelis who had committed anti-Arab attacks that were completely unprovoked, which the Israeli security forces differentiate from “price tag” attacks.[128]

After the murder of 3 Israeli teenagers were found on June 30, 2014, a Facebook Page created by an unknown group of Israelis called “The People of Israel Demand Vengeance!” or “The people of Israel demand revenge!” The page features a myriad of photos of people holding up signs demanding revenge for the killing of the teens, and urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to order widespread military action in the West Bank and Gaza. Further racist incitement within the Facebook campaign depicted a photograph that was posted to the page with two teenage girls smiling, hugging each other and holding a piece of paper saying, “Hating Arabs is not racism, it’s values.” Another post showed an armed IDF soldier with “Revenge!” in Hebrew inscribed on his chest. The Facebook Campaign received more than 30,000 likes by the evening of July 3, 2014. The campaign has been condemned by a number of Israeli MK’s including Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Minister of Agriculture and Yisrael Beiteinu MK Yair Shamir. The Israeli Defense Forces also vowed to severely punish any soldier involved with the exchange of racist photographs depicting revenge for the murdered teens or retributive incitement of Anti-Arabism across Facebook and other social media sites.[129][130]

Also in November 2014 a Druze soldier, veteran of Operation Protective Edge, was refused entry to a pub where his Jewish friends were. A security guard told him that he was not allowed to let non-Jews enter. While the owner claimed it was a private club, Jewish patron denied this claim, noting they were allowed to enter without membership. A friend of the Druse IDF soldier said,”Apparently, they are good enough to fight in Gaza but not to enter a pub.”[131]

On November 21, 2014 during a Tel Aviv soccer match, hundreds of Bnei Yehuda fans rose and chanted, “Death to Arabs!” The fans threw trash at an Arab player who was injured and was being taken off the field.[132]

On November 29, 2014, an apparent hate crime including arson and racist graffiti was perpetrated in Jerusalem on a dual Hebrew and Arabic language school. Graffiti spray painted at the school included, “Death to Arabs!”, “Kahane was right!”, “Down with assimilation!” and “There is no co-existence with cancer!” Police say the fire was set on purpose. Education Minister Shai Piron spoke out against the vandalism, saying it represented a “violent, criminal and despicable act done to undermine the foundations of Israeli democracy.”[133] Mohamad Marzouk, head of communications for the Hand in Hand school in Kfar Qara, noted that the attack brought out a show of community support for the school. In the minds of many people the arson, he said, “crossed a red line.”[134] The Israeli police arrested a number of suspects in connection with this arson attack.[135] Following the arrest, the mother of one of the suspects said she would have burned the school as well, if it were not illegal to do so, and she expressed disgust and revulsion that Jews and Arabs studied together at the school.[136] In courtroom photos the three members of the radical group are shown smiling and smirking as they faced charges.[137] On 30 November, a synagogue in Tel Aviv had several books burned and was vandalized with graffiti against the Jewish nation-state bill,[138] which most recently, had been submitted the previous week.

The Times of Israel reported on January 1, 2015 that three Jewish men who had admitted to committing racist hate crimes against an Arab taxi driver in early 2014 were each sentenced to approximately one year in prison. The criminals admitted they had hailed the cab, then began beating and insulting the cab driver. When the driver escaped the car and ran for help, the perpetrators smashed the taxi sunroof.[139]

Racism in soccer stadiums is a worldwide problem, and Israeli stadiums are not free from racism.[141] The first racist incidents took place in the 1970s, when the Arab player Rifaat Turk joined Hapoel Tel Aviv. Turk was subjected to anti-Arab abuse during nearly every game he played.[140] Arab soccer player Abbas Suan was confronted once with a sign reading “Abbas Suan, you don’t represent us”.[142] Under Israeli law, soccer fans can be prosecuted for incitement of racial hatred. The “New Voices from the Stadium” program, run by the New Israel Fund (NIF) amasses a “racism index” that is reported to the media on a weekly basis, and teams have been fined and punished for the conduct of their fans. According to Steve Rothman, the NIF San Francisco director, “Things have definitely improved, particularly in sensitizing people to the existence of racism in Israeli society.”[141] In 2006, Israel joined Football Against Racism in Europe (FARE), network set up to counter racism in soccer.[143]

After a soccer game in March 2012, in which Beitar Jerusalem defeated a rival team at Jerusalem’s Teddy Stadium,[144] a group of at least a hundred Beitar fans[145][146][147] entered the nearby Malha Mall chanting racist slogans and allegedly attacked Arab cleaning workers, whom some reports described as Palestinians. The police were criticized for initially failing to make arrests;[148] it later investigated the incident, issuing restraining orders against 20 soccer fans and questioning several suspects among the cleaning crew seen waving sticks at the fans.[149]

Some Jewish Israelis of Eastern European descent, known also as Ashkenazim, have been described as viewing themselves as superior to Sephardim and non-Ashkenazi Jews generally. They are accused of maintaining an elite position in Israeli society,[150][151] with some describing the attitudes of Ashkenazim as racist or of being a manifestation of racism.[152]

Other authorities describe the discrimination by Ashkenazi as class-based, not race-based.[153][154] For example, the differences between (Mizrahi) Sephardic Jews (N. Africans, Middle Easterners, Yemenites, etc.) are referred to as Adatiyut [155][156][157][158] community-differences (resulting also in some traditional customary gaps).[159]

Some sources claim that reports of intra-Jewish discrimination in Israel arise from propaganda published by Arab sources which ignores the normality and harmony between the communities.[160][161]

Israeli society in general and Ashkenazi Jews in particular have been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent, known as Mizrahi Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Oriental Jews.[163] A variety of Mizrahi critics of Israeli policy have cited “past ill-treatment, including the maabarot, the squalid tent cities into which Mizrahim were placed upon arrival in Israel; the humiliation of Moroccan and other Mizrahi Jews when Israeli immigration authorities shaved their heads and sprayed their bodies with the pesticide DDT; the socialist elite’s enforced secularization; the destruction of traditional family structure, and the reduced status of the patriarch by years of poverty and sporadic unemployment” as examples of mistreatment.[164] In September 1997, Israeli Labor Party leader Ehud Barak made a high-profile apology to Oriental Jews in Netivot stating:

Barak’s address also said that during the 1950s, Mizrahi immigrants were “made to feel that their own traditions were inferior to those of the dominant Ashkenazi [European-origin] Israelis [Alex Weingrod’s paraphrase].”[166] Several prominent Labor party figures, including Teddy Kollek and Shimon Peres, distanced themselves from the apology while agreeing that mistakes were made during the immigration period.[166]

The cultural differences between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews impacted the degree and rate of assimilation into Israeli society, and sometimes the divide between Eastern European and Middle Eastern Jews was quite sharp. Segregation, especially in the area of housing, limited integration possibilities over the years.[167] Intermarriage between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim is increasingly common in Israel, and by the late 1990s 28% of all Israeli children had multi-ethnic parents (up from 14% in the 1950s).[168] A 1983 research found that children of inter-ethnic marriages in Israel enjoyed improved socio-economic status.[169]

Although social integration is constantly improving, disparities persist. A study conducted by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (ICBS), Mizrahi Jews are less likely to pursue academic studies than Ashkenazi Jews. Israeli-born Ashkenazi are up to twice more likely to study in a university than Israeli-born Mizrahim.[170] Furthermore, the percentage of Mizrahim who seek a university education remains low compared to second-generation immigrant groups of Ashkenazi origin, such as Russians.[171] According to a survey by the Adva Center,[172] the average income of Ashkenazim was 36 percent higher than that of Mizrahim in 2004.[173]

Some claim that the education system discriminates against Jewish minorities from North Africa and the Middle East, and one source suggests that “ethnic prejudice against Mizrahi Jews is a relatively general phenomenon, not limited to the schooling process”.[174]

There was a case in 2010, when a Haredi school system, where Sephardi and Mizrahi students were sometimes excluded or segregated.[175][176] In 2010, the Israeli supreme court sent a strong message against discrimination in a case involving the Slonim Hassidic sect of the Ashkenazi, ruling that segregation between Ashkenazi and Sephardi students in a school is illegal.[177] They argue that they seek “to maintain an equal level of religiosity, not from racism.”[178] Responding to the charges, the Slonim Haredim invited Sephardi girls to school, and added in a statement: All along, we said it’s not about race, but the High Court went out against our rabbis, and therefore we went to prison.”[179]

In the 1950s, 1,033[180] children of Yemenite immigrant families disappeared. In most instances, the parents claim that they were told their children were ill and required hospitalization. Upon later visiting the hospital, it is claimed that the parents were told that their children had died though no bodies were presented or graves which have later proven to be empty in many cases were shown to the parents. Those who believe the theory contend that the Israeli government as well as other organizations in Israel kidnapped the children and gave them for adoption. Secular Israeli Jews of European descent were accused of collaborating in the disappearance of babies of Yemeni Jews and anti religious motives and Anti-religious coercion were alleged,[181][182][183][184][185][186][187] Some went further to accuse the Israeli authorities of conspiring to kidnap the Yemeni children due to “racist” motives.[188]

In 2001 a seven-year public inquiry commission concluded that the accusations that Yemenite children were kidnapped are not true. The commission has unequivocally rejected claims of a plot to take children away from Yemenite immigrants. The report determined that documentation exists for 972 of the 1,033 missing children. Five additional missing babies were found to be alive. The commission was unable to discover what happened in another 56 cases. With regard to these unresolved 56 cases, the commission deemed it “possible” that the children were handed over for adoption following decisions made by individual local social workers, but not as part of an official policy.[180]

In 1962, authorities in Israel were accused by articles in the Indian press of racism in relation to Jews of Indian ancestry (called Bene Israel).[189][190] In the case that caused the controversy, the Chief Rabbi of Israel ruled that before registering a marriage between Indian Jews and Jews not belonging to that community, the registering rabbi should investigate the lineage of the Indian applicant for possible non-Jewish descent, and in case of doubt, require the applicant to perform conversion or immersion.[189][190] The alleged discrimination may actually be related to the fact that some religious authorities believe that the Bene Israel are not fully Jewish because of inter-marriage during their long separation.[191]

In 1964 the government of Israel led by Levi Eshkol declared that it regards Bene Israel of India as Jews without exception, who are equal to other Jews in respect of all matters.[189]

Nearly all of the Ethiopian Beta Israel community, a community of Black Jews, resides in Israel. The Israeli government has mounted rescue operations, most notably during Operation Moses (1984) and Operation Solomon (1991), for their migration when civil war and famine threatened populations within Ethiopia.[citation needed] Today 81,000 Israelis were born in Ethiopia, while 38,500 or 32% of the community are native born Israelis.[192]

According to the sociologist Prof. Uzi Rebhun, it represents an ambitious attempt to deny the significance of race.[193] Israeli authorities, aware of the situation of most African diaspora communities in other Western countries, hosted programs to avoid setting in patterns of discrimination.[193] The Ethiopian Jewish community’s internal challenges have been complicated by racist attitudes on the part of some elements of Israeli society and the official establishment.[194] Racism has commonly been cited as explanation for policies and programs that failed to meet expectations. Racism was alleged regarding delays in admitting Ethiopian Jews to Israel under the Law of return.[193] The delays in admitting Ethiopians may be attributed to religious motivations rather than racism, since there was debate whether or not Falasha Jews’ (Beta Israel) were Jewish.[195][196]

Racism was also alleged in 2009, in a case where school children of Ethiopian ancestry were denied admission into three semi-private religious schools in the town of Petah Tikva. An Israeli government official criticised the Petah Tikva Municipality and the semi-private Haredi schools, saying “This concerns not only the three schools that have, for a long time, been deceiving the entire educational system. For years, racism has developed here undeterred”. Shas spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef threatened to fire any school principal from Shas’s school system who refused to receive Ethiopian students. The Israeli Education Ministry decided to pull the funding from the Lamerhav, Da’at Mevinim and Darkei Noam schools, the three semi-private institutions that refused to accept the students. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke out against the rejection of Ethiopian children, calling it “a moral terror attack.”[197][198]

When Ethiopians protested that blood donations from their community were thrown out, Harry Wall the Israeli Director of the The Anti-Defamation League stated that it was the result of the high incidence of HIV in Africans, not racism: “Whatever Israel’s mistakes towards its Ethiopian Jewish community, the cause is not racism.” It explains that “what causes the distress is bureaucratic ineptitude and a cultural gap between a traditional community and a modern, technologically-advanced, highly-competitive nation.”[199]

In 2012, Israel appointed the country’s first Ethiopian-born ambassador, Belaynesh Zevadia. According to the foreign minister of Israel, this represents an important milestone in fighting racism and prejudice.[200]

In 2010, Israel was accused of a “sterilization policy” aimed towards Ethiopian Jews, for allowing the prescription of contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera to the community.[201][202] They stated that the Israeli government deliberately gives female Ethiopian Jews long-lasting contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera.[201] Jewish agencies involved in immigration said that Ethiopian women were offered different types of contraceptives and that “all of them participated voluntarily in family planning”.[201] Dr. Yifat Bitton, a member of the Israeli Anti-Discrimination Legal Center “Tmura” said that 60 percent of the women receiving this contraceptive are Ethiopian Jews, while Ethiopians made up only 1 percent of population and “the gap here is just impossible to reconcile in any logical manner that would somehow resist the claims of racism”.[201] Professor Zvi Bentwich, an immunologist and human rights activist from Tel-Aviv, rejected the claim and said there’s no ground to suspect a negative official policy towards Ethiopian Jews.[201]

Israel initially denied the claim of imposing a sterilization policy on the Ethiopian women,[201] but later admitted to it, and ordered gynaecologists to stop administering the drugs for women of Ethiopian origin if there is concern that they might not understand the ramifications of the treatment.[203] Action on the issue finally took place after a documentary aired in December 2012 on public television. In it, 35 Ethiopian women who had immigrated to Israel said they had been told they would not be allowed into Israel unless they agreed to the shots. While Ethiopians have been admitted to Israel, they are often discriminated against in education and in employment. The Times of Israel notes details of a nurse, unaware of a hidden camera, saying Depo-Provera is given to Ethiopian women because “they forget, they dont understand, and its hard to explain to them, so its best that they receive a shot once every three months basically they dont understand anything.” [204]

Thereafter, the Israeli government began an investigation into the policy, and instructed gynecologists not to administer the shots if there is suspicion that the recipient does not fully understand the effects.[205]

In April 2015 an Ethiopian soldier in the IDF was the victim of an unprovoked and allegedly racist attack by an Israeli policeman and the attack was caught on video. The soldier, Damas Pakedeh, was arrested and accused of attacking the policeman. He believes the incident was racially motivated and that if the video had not been taken, he would have been punished. Likud MK Avraham Neguise called on National Police Chief Yohanan Danino to prosecute the police officer and volunteer, saying they engaged in a gross violation of the basic law of respecting others and their liberty by those who are supposed to protect us. The Jerusalem Post notes that in 2015 ” there have been a series of reports in the Israeli press about alleged acts of police brutality against Ethiopian Israelis, with many in the community saying they are unfairly targeted and treated more harshly than other citizens.”[206][207] The incident of police brutality with Pakedeh and alleged brutality of officials from Israel’s Administration of Border Crossings, Population and Immigration with Walla Bayach, an Israeli of Ethiopian descent, brought the Ethiopian community to protest. Hundreds of Ethiopians participated in protests the streets of Jerusalem on April 20, 2015 to decry what they view as “rampant racism” and violence in Israel directed at their community. Israel Police Commissioner Yohanan Danino met with representatives of the Israeli Ethiopian community that day following the recent violent incidents involving police officers and members of the community.[208] When over a thousand people protested police brutality against Ethiopians and dark skinned Israelis, Prime MInister Benjamin Netanyahu announced:I strongly condemn the beating of the Ethiopian IDF soldier, and those responsible will be held accountable. [209] Following protests and demonstrations in Tel Aviv that resulted in violence, Netanyahu planned to meet with representatives of the Ethiopian community, including Pakado. Netanyahu said the meeting would include Danino and representatives of several ministries, including Immigrant Absorption. Danino already announced that the officer who beat Pakado had been fired.[210]

A 2009 PEW poll, which included 527 Israeli Arab respondents, showed that 35% of Israeli Arabs said their opinion of Jews was unfavorable, while 56% said their opinion was favorable (the figures amongst Israeli Jews on their attitude of themselves were 94% favorable; 6% unfavorable).[citation needed]

The 2008 Index of Arab-Jewish Relations in Israel by the Jewish-Arab Center found that 40.5% of the Arab citizens of Israel denied the Holocaust, up from 28% in 2006.[211][212] This report also states that “In Arab eyes disbelief in the very happening of the Shoah is not hate of Jews (embedded in the denial of the Shoah in the West) but rather a form of protest. Arabs not believing in the event of Shoah intend to express strong objection to the portrayal of the Jews as the ultimate victim and to the underrating of the Palestinians as a victim. They deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state that the Shoah gives legitimacy to.”[212]

Numerous racist attacks against Jews have taken place throughout Arab localities in the Galilee and in Arab areas of Jerusalem, including murders. Among the people killed in such attacks was Kristine Luken, an American tourist stabbed in a forest near Jerusalem after being seen wearing a Star of David necklace.[213] In Jerusalem, Jews driving through Al-Issawiya have been subjected to ambushes by crowds, as was a repairman who had been hired by a resident.[214] Emergency services vehicles have also been attacked while passing through the neighborhood. Jews who travel to the Mount of Olives also risk violence.[215] Jews who enter or buy property in Arab areas face harassment, and Arabs who have sold property to Jews have been murdered. In 2010, an Israeli-Jewish security guard, Kochav Segal Halevi, was forced from his home in the Arab town of I’billin after a racist crowd gathered at his house, and he received death threats.[216]

In 2008, the slogan “Death to the Jews” was found spray-painted in Arabic on the cargo hold of an El Al plane.[217]

In 2010, the wall of a synagogue and a Jewish residence in the mixed Jewish-Arab Ajami neighborhood of Jaffa were spray-painted with swastikas and Palestinian flags.[218]

In 2014, Arabs from Shfaram murdered Shelly Dadon.

Journalist Ben-Meir described Arab Knesset members who “talk incessantly about the Palestinian people’s rights, including their own state” but who “refuse to acknowledge Israel as the state of the Jewish people and deny the very existence of a Jewish people as a nation with national rights” as racist.[219] Ariel Natan Pasko, a policy analyst, suggested that prominent Arab leaders such as Arab member of Knesset Ahmad Tibi is racist because he “turned away from integration” and “wants to build an Arab university in Nazareth, as well as an Arab hospital in the Galilee.”[220] Tibi had been previously accused of racism: in 1997, he said “whoever sells his house to the Jews has sold his soul to Satan and done a despicable act”.[221]

The head of the Islamic movement in Israel’s Northern Branch, was charged with incitement to racism and to violence. During legal proceedings, the prosecution said that Sheikh Raed Salah made his inflammatory remarks “with the objective of inciting racism.”[222][223] he also accused Jews of using children’s blood to bake bread.[224] He said, “”We have never allowed ourselves to knead [the dough for] the bread that breaks the fast in the holy month of Ramadan with children’s blood,” he said. “Whoever wants a more thorough explanation, let him ask what used to happen to some children in Europe, whose blood was mixed in with the dough of the [Jewish] holy bread.”

Black Hebrew Israelites are groups of people mostly of African American ancestry who believe they are descendants of the ancient Israelites. They are generally not accepted as Jews by the greater Jewish community. Many choose to self-identify as Hebrew Israelites or Black Hebrews rather than as Jews.[225][226][227][228]

When the first Black Hebrews arrived in Israel in 1969, they claimed citizenship under the Law of Return, which gives eligible Jews immediate citizenship.[229] The Israeli government ruled in 1973 that the group did not qualify for automatic citizenship, and the Black Hebrews were denied work permits and state benefits. The group responded by accusing the Israeli government of racist discrimination.[230][231]

In 1981, a group of American civil rights activist led by Bayard Rustin investigated and concluded that racism was not the cause of Black Hebrews’ situation.[232] In 1990, Illinois legislators helped negotiate an agreement that resolved the Black Hebrews’ legal status in Israel. Members of the group are permitted to work and have access to housing and social services. In 2003 the agreement was revised, and the Black Hebrews were granted permanent resident status.[233][234][235]

In his 1992 essay “Blacks and Jews: The Uncivil War”, historian Taylor Branch wrote that Black Hebrews were initially denied citizenship due to anti-black sentiment among Israeli Jews (according to mainstream Jewish religious authorities, members of the Black Hebrew Israelite group are not Jewish).[236][237] According to historian Dr. Seth Forman the claims that the Black Hebrew Israelites were denied citizenship because they were black seem baseless, particularly in light of Israel’s airlift of thousands of black Ethiopian Jews in the early 1990s.[238]

In April 2012, the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet reported[239] that tens of thousands of refugees and African migrant workers who have come to Israel in dangerous smuggling routes, live in southern Tel Aviv’s Levinsky Park. SvD reported that some Africans in the park sleep on cardboard boxes under the stars, others crowd in dark hovels. Also was noted a situation with African refugees, such as Sudanese from Darfur, Eritreans, Ethiopians and other African nationalities, who stand in queue to the soup kitchen, organized by Israeli volunteers. The interior minister reportedly “wants everyone to be deported”.

In May 2012, disgruntlement toward Africans and calls for deportation and “blacks out” in Tel Aviv boiled over into death threats, fire bombings, rioting, and property destruction. Protesters blamed immigrants for worsening crime and the local economy, some of protesters were seen throwing eggs at African immigrants[240][241]

In what became known as the October 2000 events, Arab-Israelis rioted while protesting Israeli actions in the early stages of the Second Intifada, attacking Jewish civilians and Israeli police with live gunfire, molotov cocktails, stones, and vandalism of Jewish property. One Egged bus was torched on the first day. Arab rioting took place in Umm al-Fahm, Baqa al-Gharbiyye, Sakhnin, Nazareth, Lod, Kafar Kanna, Mashhad, Arraba, Ramla, Or Akiva and Nazareth Illit. A Jewish citizen was killed when his car was stoned, and a synagogue was torched. Hundreds of Arab residents of Jaffa burned tires, threw rocks, and beat reporters.[242] Throughout the course of the riots, Israeli Police repeatedly opened fire at Arab riots and demonstrations, killing 13 people, including 12 Arab-Israelis and one Palestinian from Gaza.

Thousands of Jews counter-rioted against Arabs in Nazareth, Bat Yam, Petah Tikva, Tiberias, Tel Aviv, Acre, Nazareth Illit, Lod, Rosh HaAyin, Or Akiva and Jerusalem, throwing stones at and beating Arabs, vandalizing and torching Arab homes and property, attacking Arab traffic, and chanting “Death to the Arabs!”.[243] An Arab worker was stabbed on his way to work in Rosh HaAyin. In Jaffa, a mosque was vandalized, and another was torched in Tiberias. In Tel Aviv, Arab restaurant workers were chased from a restaurant, and their cars set alight.

Sam Lehman-Wilzig, Political Communications Professor at Bar-Ilan University, said that rioting is rare and alien to Jewish political society. “The numbers (of riots) are so low because of our Jewish political culture which encourages protesting, but seriously discourages violent protest,” he said. He argues that the riots were caused since Israelis felt threatened by the “pressure cooker syndrome” of fighting not just the Palestinians and Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas, but also the Israeli Arab population.[244]

In 2008, a series of riots broke out in Acre, after an Arab motorist and his teenage son drove into a predominantly Jewish neighborhood during Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish religion, to visit relatives. According to police, their car’s windows were down and music was blaring. Police spokesperson Eran Shaked said that “this was a provocation… we believe he was intoxicated. This was a deliberate act”.[245] Their vehicle was pelted with stones, and they sought refuge in a relative’s home. A Jewish mob chased them, then gathered around the building chanting “Death to the Arabs!”, and attacked police who tried to intervene.[246] An incorrect rumor spread among the Arab residents that the driver had been killed, prompting calls from local mosques to avenge his death.[247] Arabs rioted in the city center, smashing shop windows, vandalizing vehicles, and throwing rocks at people going to or from Yom Kippur prayers,[248][249] chanting Death to the Jews” and “If you come out of your homes, you will die”. Israeli Police forcibly dispersed the rioters with tear gas and stun grenades. As soon as the Yom Kippur fast ended, about 200 Jewish residents rioted in Acre’s Arab neighborhoods, torching homes, vandalizing property, and forcing dozens of families to flee. Riots and retaliations by both sides continued for four days.[247]Haaretz editorialized that that year’s “Yom Kippur will be infamous for the violent, racist outburst by Jews against Arabs within Israel”.

During the course of monitoring elections in 2009, a Member of the Knesset (MK) replaced another Jewish election monitor at the Israeli-Arab town of Umm al-Fahm, who was prevented by police from entering the city because of threats by local Arabs on his life. As soon as the MK began to perform his duties, an Israeli-Arab mob rioted outside attacking the guards and shouts of Death to the Jews could be heard. Israeli Police arrested five rioters.[250]

Israel has a law that prohibits incitement to racism.[5]

According to the State Department, Israel’s anti-discrimination law “prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, marital status, or sexual orientation. The law also prohibits discrimination by both government and nongovernment entities on the basis of race, religion, political beliefs, and age.”

Israel is a signatory of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination treaty since 1966, and has ratified the treaty in 1979.[251] The treaty forbids any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

The Anti Defamation League states: “There is no Israeli ideology, policy or plan to segregate, persecute or mistreat its Israeli Arab citizens, nor Palestinian Arabs,” it goes on in saying that Israel is a democracy which encourages vibrant debate, which has a flourishing free press and which shares with other liberal democracies a core value: the equality of all its citizens before the law.[252]

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs states that “Arab Israelis are citizens of Israel with equal rights” and states that “The only legal distinction between Arab and Jewish citizens is not one of rights, but rather of civic duty. Since Israel’s establishment, Arab citizens have been exempted from compulsory service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).”[253]

See the rest here:

Racism in Israel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Leading Jewish Paper Admits: American … – David Duke.com

The Jewish Daily Forward, one of Americans leading leftist Zionist publications, has openly admitted that American Jews turn a blind eye to Jewish racism while continually accusing everybody else of being racist.

In what is a rare example of Jewish Supremacist honesty, the Jewish Daily Forward said in an article titled Israels Everyday Racism and How American Jews Turn a Blind Eye to It, that Jews were outraged when Jesse Jackson referred to New York as Hymietown. Wheres the anger over Israeli public figures rampant racism?

The Jewish Daily Forward continued:

The Anti-Defamation League and the rest of the American Jewish establishment owe Jesse Jackson a big apology. They put the man through the wringer, they made him apologize in every possible forum for his Hymie and Hymietown remarks back in 1984. Yet look at the kinds of things Israeli leaders senior government ministers, chief rabbis get away with without ever having to apologize, without ever being punished in the slightest.

The paper goes on to list a number of incidents, including Israeli government officials saying that Arabs need to be murdered to the Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel, David Lau, saying that Jews should not watch Basketball on television.What difference does it make, Lau said, if the kushim who get paid in Tel Aviv beat the kushim who get paid in Greece?

Kushim, especially when used in a dismissive context like Lau did, is a well-understood derogatory term for blacks, equivalent to the N-word.

The paper goes on to list a number of other examples of racism in Israel which have been ignored by American Jewry (and the Jewish Supremacist controlled media in America):

Likud lawmaker Miri Regev is doing fine after having called Sudanese refugees a cancer on our body to a crowd of hopped-up south Tel Avivians in May of last year, shortly before the crowd went on a window-smashing mini-pogrom against the Africans in the neighborhood.

Legendary basketball coach Pini Gershons career and public stature didnt suffer at all after he explained his racial theory about blacks to a class of amused army officers in 2000. The mocha-colored guys are smarter, but the dark colored ones are just guys off the street, Gershon said. Theyre dumb like slaves, they do whatever you tell them.

Nor was there any blowback whatsoever after Bibi Netanyahu bragged in 2007 that the cuts hed made to child subsidies had brought a positive result, which he identified as the demographic effect on the non-Jewish public, where there was a dramatic drop in the birth rate. Imagine the scandal if an American political leader boasted publicly that his cuts to child subsidies had reduced the non-Christian birth rate. Imagine the ADLs reaction. But in Israel, in 2007, from the mouth of a once-and-future prime minister nothing.

Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to boast about how they manage to reduce non-European birth-rates?

Although the article is revealing, and, as said, unusually honest, it is also an exercise in misdirection. It focusses on comments by individuals and thereby tries to make out that these are just one-off unfortunate remarks which anybody could make.

The reality of the Zionist state is of course completely differentits racism is not limited to individual derogatory comments here and there, but instead is founded on an institutionalized and legally enforced Jewish Supremacist racist ideology.

The Jewish Daily Forward article deliberately ignored these examples in its review:

In the Jews-only state, immigration is strictly controlled, and the Zionists use DNA tests on potential immigrants to ensure that their state remains racially pure. Of course, in America and other nations, these same Jewish Supremacists are at the forefront of demanding open borders for everyone else.

In Israel, theJewish state funds organizations, private and public, which work full time to prevent Jews from mixing with non-Jews. The same Jewish organizations which promote racial intermarriage for every other nation, support Israel where a Jew cannot legally marry a non-Jew. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of promoting the mixing of Gentiles of all ethnicities.

In America, and other Western nations,Jewish Supremacists have been behind the legalization of same-sex marriages; but they devotedly support Israel where same sex marriage is illegal.

In Israel, asylum seeking is virtually impossible. In 2011, for example, the Jewish state granted exactly one (1) asylum seeker refuge in Israel. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of demanding that asylum seekers be given refuge, even if they have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach their intended destinations.

-In Israel, it is that states formally declared policy to be a Jewish state and nothing else. In any other nation around the world, any attempt by the indigenous people to preserve their identity isvehemently opposed by the organized Jewish lobby.

In Israel, the Jewish state builds entire settlements on land it stole from the Palestinians, where Palestinians are forbidden to live. Israel has thousands of segregated schools. institutions, apartment buildings and neighborhoods, reserved for Jews only. In Americaor any other nation on earthJewish Supremacist groups such as the ADL or SPLC are at the forefront of legal actions against any local authority or public organization which is segregated on any basis whatsoeverand especially any organization which might want to exclude Jews.

These are just some of the very real examples of Jewish racism which the Daily Jewish Forward could have listedbut that level of honesty would probably be asking too much.

Nonetheless, the point is still valid: In Israel, Jewish Supremacy is rampantly racist, while in America and elsewhere, the Israel-supporting Jewish lobbies pose as anti-racists.

Jewish Racism Strongest When Directed against Europeans

There are two other truths which the Jewish Daily Forward article has covered up:

1. That Jewish Supremacist racism, although applied against all Gentiles, is most vituperative and strongest in its hatred when directed against Europeans and European-Americans in particular; and

2. That this vicious anti-European racism is not limited to Israel, but is prevalent among Jewish Supremacists living in America as well.

For example, Dr. Richard Steinlight, a former Director of National Affairs (domestic policy) at the American Jewish Committee, wrote in an article titled The Jewish Stake in Americas Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy published by the Center for Immigration Studies in 2001, stated it very clearly:

Ill confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative years . . . I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language and was taught the superiority of my people to the Gentiles who oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as people less sensitive, intelligent and moral than ourselves.

Rabbi Yhitzhak Ginsburgh: Gentiles are not human.

American born Rabbi Yitzchak Ginzburg and his teachings are discussed in a by Motti Inbari called Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple? (State University of New York Press, April 23, 2009) as follows:

In his writings, Ginzburg gives prominence to Halachic and kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect.

He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in Gods image, the Gentiles do not have this status, and are effectively considered subhuman.

Accordingly, for example, the commandment Thou shall not murder does not apply to the killing of a Gentile, since You shall not murder relates to the murder of a human, while for him the Gentiles do not constitute humans.

Similarly, Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully. (Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple? Page 134.)

Racist Rabbi Ovadia Yosef with his good friend, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Recently deceasedracist Rabbi OvadiaYosef, head of the Sephardic Jewish community in Israel, was famous for his open hatred of Gentiles.

For example, he is on record in the Jewish Telegraphic Agencyas saying that Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel, he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.

Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat, he said to some laughter.

Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to make such remarks?

Jewish organizations in America and elsewhere spend billions of dollars on anti-assimilation policies designed to prevent Jews from marrying non-Jews.

Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European advocacy group had to spend millions on programs to prevent Europeans marrying Jews?

Most importantly of all, the reason why Jewish Supremacists have been able to take over so many institutions created by Europeans (such as Hollywood, the media, educational institutions and so on) is precisely because of their racist clique which actively discriminates against Europeans in favor of themselves.

All of these factors are deliberately ignored by the Jewish Daily Forward, which instead focusses on individual acts of ant-African racism to be found in Israel. After all, anything is better than admitting to their real focus of their racism: a ongoing and driven hatred of Europeans and European-Americans in particular.

Read more:

Leading Jewish Paper Admits: American … – David Duke.com

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Why is it? The Only Racism You Can’t Criticize is Jewish …

In America The Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations is composed of the 50 largest Jewish organizations. It includes some the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the ADL and many more with global reach.

With over a billion dollars of wealth they are dedicated to Israel and Jewish interests nationally and globally. They support clear domestic policies in Western nations. They all support Israel, But the policies they support for every other nation are the very opposite of that of Israel.

1) They support Israel which bans same sex marriage in defense of the Jewish family.

BUT SUPPORT SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN EVERY OTHER NATION.

2) They support Israel where it is illegal for a Jew to marry a non-Jew. Most of the largest Jewish organizations in Western nations have programs to prevent intermarriage of Jews and non-Jews.

BUT THEY WOULD DEMONIZE AS NAZI ANY NATION, ORGANIZATION OR PERSON THAT WOULD CONDEMN GENTILE INTERMARRIAGE WITH JEWS.

3) They support Israel which has the strictest immigration policies in the world, based on Jewish DNA and accept almost no refugees.

BUT IN EVERY NATION OTHER THAN ISRAEL THEY SUPPORT OPEN IMMIGRATION AND MASSIVE NUMBERS OF REFUGEES.

4) They support Israel which is overwhelmingly segregated in schools, apartments, neighborhoods, whole cities and towns and even in the settlements they stole from Palestinians. Israel even segregates public transport and has Jews only roads in the occupied territories.

BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION THEY CONDEMN SEGREGATION.

5) They support Israel where Israel citizens can publicly carry around machine guns if they wish.

BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION SUPPORT STRICT GUN CONTROL.

6) They Support Israel which honors Jews who spout hate and even genocide against Gentiles (such as the late Rabbi Yosef).

BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION, THEY WOULD CONDEMN ANY PROMINENT GENTILE THAT WOULD SAY THINGS EVEN REMOTELY SIMILAR.

7) They support Israel where massive casino gambling such as in Las Vegas is not permitted.

BUT THEY SUPPORT IT IN AMERICA WHERE JEWISH SUPREMACIST, RADICAL ZIONISTS SUCH AS SHELDON ADELSON MAKE FORTUNES FROM CASINOS AND THEN USE THE MONEY FROM THE VICE TO BE AMERICAS BIGGEST CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR.

8) They support Israel which a Jewish State that celebrates and honors its Jewish religion and culture.

IN AMERICA AND ELSEWHERE, JEWISH SUPREMACIST GROUPS ARE AT THE FOREFRONT OF LEGAL ACTION TO REMOVE ALL CHRISTIAN SYMBOLS OR REFERENCES FROM PUBLIC PLACES. IN THE HEIGHT OF CHUTZPAH AT THE SAME TIME, THEY DEMAND THE RIGHT TO ERECT JEWISH SYMBOLS AT ALL PUBLIC PLACES SUCH AS IN FRONT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.

9) They support Israel which is the very opposite of diversity. In fact they demand that Israel be a Jewish State openly dedicated to the Jewish People.

There are no powerful media owned by non-Jews in Israel. There are no Gentiles in control the Israeli National Banking system. Jewish organizations around the world support Israel where its 20 percent Palestinian population is only 11 percent of University students.

BUT IN AMERICA AND EUROPE EVERY JEWISH ORGANIZATION SUPPORTS THE COMPLETE LACK OF DIVERSITY IN ISRAEL AND AT THE SAME TIME A PHONY DIVERSITY IN AMERICA AND EUROPE IN WHICH JEWS, 2 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION CONTROL MEDIA, FINANCE AND GOVERNMENT.

Jews, who are only 2 percent of the population comprise 25 percent of the top universities, while European Americans, who are 70 percent of the population are only 20 percent. This domination at Harvard and the Ivy League is not because 2 percent of the Students comprise 25 percent of the best students. In fact, Jews are 14 times (1,400 percent) over represented than they should be by qualification and merit).

They totally control the major Hollywood movie and TV studios and most of the worlds media conglomerates due to Jewish tribalist racism.

They also dominate International banking such as the worlds leading predator criminal bank Goldman Sachs as well as the Federal Reserve Bank, the World Bank and the IMF.

They dont dominate Hollywood because the 98 percent of the non-Jewish population is not capable. They dominate for one overwhelming reason, because of their racist tribalism. The real privilege in America is Jewish privilege. The real most powerful and virulent racism in America is Jewish racism.

Why is Jewish racism the only racism you cant criticize?

Answer: because Jewish racists control the means by which criticism is heard: the media. With their media, financial and political control, they tyrannically prevent any discussion of the truth about racist Israel and the most powerful tribal racism on Earth; Jewish Supremacism.

Go here to see the original:

Why is it? The Only Racism You Can’t Criticize is Jewish …

Fair Usage Law

June 12, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Kill All Pedophiles by John de Nugent

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Speech, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

Leo Frank is Interrogated by Atlanta Police On Monday morning, April 28, 1913 in the presence of his powerful lawyers Luther Zeigler Rosser and Herbert Haas.

The Monday morning, April 28, 1913 interrogation of Leo Frank at Atlanta’s Stationhouse that became State’s Exhibit B at his trial (question and answer portion published in Atlanta Constitution, August 2nd, 1913). Both the Leo Frank defense and Leo Frank prosecution ratified it as being accurate. Pay special attention to the time Leo Frank says Mary Phagan arrived at his second-floor window-front business office.

Q. What is your position with the company?
A. I am general superintendent and director of the company.

Q: How long have you held that position?
A: In Atlanta I have held that position since August 10th, 1908, My place of business is at 37-41 South Forsyth Street.

Q: About how many employees have you there?
A: About 107* in that plant?

Q: Male or female?
A: Mixed. I guess there are a few more girls than boys.

Q: On Saturday, April 26, I will get you to state if that was a holiday with your company?
A: Yes, sir, it was a holiday. The factory was shut down.

Several People in Building.

Q: Who was in that building during the day?
A: Well, there were several people who come in during the morning?

Q: Was anyone in the office with you up, to noon?
A: Yes, sir, the office boy [Alonzo Mann] and a stenographer.

Q: What time did they leave?
A: About 12 or a little after.

Q: Have you a day watchman there?
A: Yes, Sir.

Q: Was he on duty at 12 o’clock?
A: No, sir, he left shortly before.

Q: Who came in after the stenographer and the office boy left?
A: This little girl. Mary Phagan, but at the time I didn’t know that was her name. She came in between 12:05 and 12:10, maybe 12:07, to get her pay envelope, her salary.

Frank Pays Mary Phagan:

Q: You paid her?
A: Yes, sir, and she went out of the office.

Q: What office was you in at that time?
A: In the inner office at my desk, the furtherest office to the left from the main office.

Q: Could you see the direction she went in when she left?
A: My impression was she just walked away I didn’t pay any particular attention.

Q: Do you keep the door locked downstairs?
A: I didn’t that morning, because the mail was coming in. I locked it at 1:10 p.m. when I went to dinner.

Q: Was anyone else in that building?
A: Yes, sir, Arthur White and Harry Denham, They were working on machinery, doing repair work, working on the top floor of the building, which is the fourth floor, toward the rear, or about the middle of the building, but a little more to the rear.

Q: What kind of work were they doing?
A: They were tightening up the belts; they are not machinists, one is a foreman in one department and the other is an assistant in another, and Denham was just assisting White, and Mrs. White, the wife of Arthur White, was also in the building. She left about 1 o’clock. I went up there and told them I was going to dinner, and they had to get out and they said they had not finished, and I said, “how long will it take?” and they said until some time in the afternoon, and then I said, “Mrs. White, you will have to go, for I am going to lock these boys in here. ”

Door was Locked:

Q: Can anyone from the inside open those doors?
A: They can open the outside door, but not the inside door, which I locked.

Q: In going in the outside door, is there any way by which anyone could go in the basement from the front?
A: Yes sir, through the trap door.

Q: They would not necessarily have to go up the steps?
A: No, sir, they couldn’t get up there if I was out.

Q: You locked the outer door?
A: Yes, sir, and I locked the inner door.

Q: What time did you get back?
A: At 3 o’clock, maybe two or three minutes before, and I went to the office and took off my coat and then went upstairs to tell those boys I was back, and I couldn’t find them at first, they were back in the dipping room, in the rear, and I said, Are you ready? and they said, We are just read, and I said, all right, ring out when you go down, to let me know when you go out, and they rang out, and Arthur White come in the office and said, Mr. Frank, loan me $2, and I said, What’s the matter? We just paid off, and he said, My wife robbed me, and I gave him $2 and he walked away, and the two of them walked out.

Newt Lee Arrives.

Q: And you locked the doors behind them?
A: I locked the outer door, when I am in there, there is no need of locking the inner door. There was only one person I was looking for to come in, and that was the nightwatchman.

Q: What time did he get there?
A: I saw him twenty minutes to 4 [3:40 p.m]

Q: Had you previously arranged for him to get there?
A: Yes, sir. On Friday night I told him, after he got his money, I gave him the keys and said you had better come around early tomorrow, because I may go to the ball game, and he came early because of that fact. I told him to be there by 4 o’clock and he came 20 minutes to 4. I figured I would leave about 1, and would not come back, but it was so cold I didn’t want to risk catching cold, and I came back to the factory as I usually do. He came in, and he said, Yes, sir, and he had a bag of bananas with him, and he offered me a banana. I didn’t see them, but he offered me one, and I guess he had them. We have told him, once he gets in that building never to go out. I told him he could go out, he got there so early, and I was going to be there. He came back about four minutes to 6, the reason I know that, I was putting the clock slips in, an the clock was right in front of me. I said, I will be reading in a minute, and he went downstairs and I came to the office and put on my coat and hat, and followed him and went out.

Saw Newt and Gantt Talking

Q: Did you see anybody with him as you went out?
A: Yes, sir; talking to him was J.M. Gantt – a man I had fired about two weeks previous.

Q: Did you have any talk with Gantt?
A: Newt told me he wanted to go up to get a pair of shoes he left while he was working there, and Gantt said to me, Newt don’t want me to go up, and he said you can go with me, Mr. Frank, and I said, that’s all right, go with him Newt and I went on home and I got home about 6:25 p.m.

Q: Is there anything else that happened that afternoon?
A: No, sir, that’s all I know.

Q: You don’t know what time Gantt came down after he went up?
A: Oh, no, I saw him go in and I locked the door after him, but I didn’t try them.

Q: Did you ask Newt?
A: Yes, sir, I telephoned him. I tried to telephone him when I got home. He punches the clock at half hour intervals, and the clock and the phone is in the office and didn’t get an answer, and at 7 o’clock I called him and asked him if Gantt got his shoes, and he said yes, he got them and I said is everything all right, and he said yes, and the next thing I know they called me at 7:30 a.m. the next morning.

Did Lee Let People In?

Q: Do you know whether your watchman at any time has been in the habit of letting people in there any time?
A: No, sir.

Q: did you ever have any trouble with any watchman about such as that?
A: No, sir.

Q: Do you know whether any of your employees go there at night?
A: Yes sir, Gantt did when he was working there, he had a key and sometimes he would have some work left over. I never have seen him go but until I go out, I go out and come back, but he has come back before I left, but that is part of his duty.

Q: Did you take a bath yesterday or Saturday night?
A: Yes, sir. Saturday night at home.

Q: Did you change your clothes?
A: Yes sir.

Q: The clothes that you changed are at home?
A: Yes sir, and this is the suit of clothes I was wearing Saturday. After I left the shop I went to Jacobs Pharmacy and bought a box of candy for my wife and got home about 6:25.

Required Reading:

100 Years Ago Today: The Trial of Leo Frank Begins
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/07/100-years-ago-today-the-trial-of-leo-frank-begins/

Leo Frank Trial Week One
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-one/

Leo Frank Trial Week Two
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-two/

One Hundred Years Ago Leo Frank Mounts the Witness Stand
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/100-years-ago-today-leo-frank-takes-the-stand

Leo Frank Trial Week Three
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-three/

Leo Frank Trial Week Four
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/09/the-leo-frank-trial-week-four/

Leo Frank Trial Closing Arguments (Frank Hooper for Prosecution, Luther Rosser and Reuben Arnold for Defense)
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/10/the-leo-frank-trial-closing-arguments-of-hooper-arnold-and-rosser/

One Hundred Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty of Murdering Mary Phagan (Published April 26, 2013)
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/

Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith: One Hundred Years of Racist Jewish Hate, October 1913 – 2013
http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/10/adl-100-years-of-hate/

Professor Emeritus of Judaic Studies: Leonard Dinnerstein’s Pseudo-history About the Leo Frank Case
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/the-leo-frank-case-a-pseudo-history/

Review of Journalist-Author Steve Oney’s book ‘The Dead Shall Rise’: Who Really Solved the Mary Phagan Murder Case?
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/10/who-really-solved-the-mary-phagan-murder-case/

Did Leo Frank Confess to the Murder of Mary Phagan?
http://theamericanmercury.org/2012/09/did-leo-frank-confess/

Atlanta Constitution Newspaper (1913 – 1915):
http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

Atlanta Georgian Newspaper (April – August, 1913):
http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

Atlanta Journal Newspaper (April – August, 1913):
http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

Fair Usage Law

April 28, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC  Comments Closed

White Jewish Racism – LA Progressive – Progressive Media …

The L.A. Progressive is a misnomer and a lie. You have outdone yourselves this time with your blatant antiSemitism and your frequently published Anti- Jewish garbage. Were another periodical publishing rants from the Ku Klux Klan regularly, you would quickly and rightfully, blast them for their lies and their bigoted crazyness. But if someone trumpets racist junk and outright fabrications against Jews, you run with it without researching in a search for truth. I doubt that you will allow this in your blog as you have censored me before when I denounce your bigotry with facts. Have you no shame?

The fact that Hutchinson has a Ph.D and was appointed to be a senior intergroup specialist or whatever that means, to the Human Relations Commission, does not give her any credibility. Throughout history there are countless Ph.Ds who have participated in slavery, and prejudice of the worst kind. At this moment in time, we have Tea Partyers with earned doctorates,mostly as OBGYNs, who also take idiotic positions on any number of things Including backing up someting one Rep. calls legitamate rape. It is an unexplainable anamoly that one side of the brain can comprehend enough to get an education but cant reason clearly, and is bound by jingoism and prejudices.

Adam Silver- a Jew, took the harshest stance against bigoted Sterling- also a Jew, and answered the question about his Jewishness with, I am a human being as he slapped Sterling appropriately with the harshest sanctions ever handed down, including the ban for life.

The people who have stood with constancy against prejudice and injustice to blacks, and in numbers like more than 90% have been the Jews, They have not trumpeted their allegiance to black people with words, but by their actions, marching, riding the freedom buses, knowing full well that they would be beaten, harassed, tortured, jailed and sometimes murdered as the two black Jewish kids were who went to Mississippi to register Black voters. Yes, the Klan murdered Goodman, Shwermer and Chaney. They could have stayed in Brooklyn where they would have been safe. They were not the first or the last sticking up for African Americans. The Jews have contributed money, time and energy, and voting and serving, to liberal causes and to civil rights for all

The discussion of when Jews became white is so ludicrous that most people dont wish to participate in the foolishness of it. Color of skin, eyes, hair, is immaterial as it is a genetic thing that can and has been changed in a very few generations. The Genes take care of that. European Jews in the North are usually light skinned, while Jews from China and Japan take on the hues of those countries. African Jews are dark. Israel rescued African Jews from Ethiopia and Sudan, by airlifting more than 20,000 of them out of Africa. When nobody would step in to save the Africans. Israel gave them free educations, especially in computer programing, after teaching them Hebrew so that they could conduct themselves while going to school or business, in the language of the country. Israel gave them free medical care and free housing. I know this because I met with the head of the Falashas, which is a pajoritive term given them by the Ethiopians. We have many black Jews, and all are equal citizens with everyone else in Israel a dynamic democracy. Israel has no record of keeping slaves, and no history of prejudice against Blacks.

Color of skin and eyes or hair is considered unimportant to Jews. All that counts is if you are an ethical, loving compassionate, human being who cares about justice for all. Jews above all are bent on doing social justice. That is what we are taught and that is what our beloved fellow Jew and the greatest teacher of our religion, taught as long ago as when he gave the sermon on the Mount. Yes, I am speaking of our family member, Yesua in Hebrew, who you call Jesus I think that is a greek name. Jesus taught of morals and ethics, concepts which had been unknown in the world before, a world that believed in myths and Gods, where concern for ones fellow human beings were strange and unknown. The Christian followers were Jewish and 35 of them fed to lions.

Yesua would be ashamed of prejudice on the basis of Color, creed, religion, or what family you were born into without having been given a choice in the matter. Wherever the Prejudice eminates from, including from Jews, Blacks or Latinos would make him ashamed. The Jews will always actively work for justice for the oppressed and the underdog, no matter how badly they are denigrated.

Have you any idea of where the term Ghetto came from? The word is Italian and it came from the fact that Jews were not allowed to live in the midst of cities with the rest of the populace. They were actually walled in cities within the city. If any of the jews were needed to work within the City, they had to have a special pass, to enter. In Eastern Europe these walled off Ghettos or the villages called Shtetles, were regularly attacked by ruffians and by Cossacks. Often the girls were raped. Maybe that is how the skin color became lighter in North Eastern Europe.

In Spain Jews were put on the rack during the inquisition and many escaped to Africa- To Morocco and Algeria. In recent years, after living in these places for hundreds of years they have been kicked out. Israel took them in and sometimes their skin is darker. Who the hell cares what skin color they have. All that matters is if they are good people. Jews were even blamed for the Bubonic Plague in the Middle ages, which made them flee Northward.

The ravings of Ms. Hutchinson should be considered much like Donald Sterlings ravings and bigoted rantings. She should be kicked off of the Human Relations Board for Life, or as senior whatever. Without any proof of any kind she portrays Jews as having gotten ahead financially because of the injustices in this country suffered by African Americana. Totally untrue! EDUCATION, was the way out of the morass and hatred of Jews. As a child I used to see signs outside of hotels and restaurants that said No Jews, no dogs allowed, it was commonplace. To this day Jews cannot get on the Boards of the big Corporations, such as oil companies, insurance, and automobile industries. They have had to be inventive.

Go here to read the rest:

White Jewish Racism – LA Progressive – Progressive Media …

Fair Usage Law

March 19, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud

Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud – “Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as “Gentiles”, “Goyim”. Let’s see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve’s “Chosen People”: “The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.” – Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b “The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.” – Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30 “Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.” – Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855 “A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.” – Coschen hamischpat 405 “The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.” – Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b “Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.” – Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b “If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.” – Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b “If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.” – Jore dea 377, 1 “Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.” – Talmud Sanhedrin 74b “It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.” – Sepher ikkarim III c 25 “It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.” – Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5 “A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.” – Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b “Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.” – Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772 The Jews behind Islamophobia Israel controls U.S. Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton… The Victories of Revisionism By Professor Robert Faurisson The Jewish hand behind Internet The Jews behind Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay… “Jews, who want to be decent human beings, have to renounce being Jewish” Jewish War Against Iran Al Jazeera English under Jewish infiltration Jewish hate against Christians By Prof. Israel Shahak Introduction to Revisionist Thought – By Ernst Zndel Karl Marx: The Jewish Question Reel Bad Arabs – Revealing the racist Jewish Hollywood propaganda “Anti-Semitism” – What is it? Videos – Important collection The Jews Banished 47 Times in 1000 Years – Why? Nation of Islam and The Synagogue of Satan – Videos The International Jew – By Henry Ford Pravda interviews Ahmed Rami Shahak’s “Jewish History” The Jewish plan to destroy the Arab countries – From the World Zionist Organization Judaism and Zionism inseparable “Jewish History” – a bookreview Revealing photos of the Jews Racist Jewish Fundamentalism “Jews” from Khazaria stealing the land of Palestine The U.S. cost of supporting Israel Turkey, Ataturk and the Jews The truth about the Talmud Israel and the Ongoing Holocaust in Congo Jews DO control the media – a Jew brags! – Revealing Jewish article Abbas – The Traitor Protocols of Zion – The whole book! Quotes – On Jewish Power / Zionism Caricatures / Cartoons

Fair Usage Law

September 1, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Jewish Racist Discrimination Against Better-Qualified …

By Dr. David Duke. White Privilege or Jewish Privilege ? The Jewish dominated media is constantly ranting about so-called white privilege in America, yet in the most important universities of America, the very institutions which form the very foundationof the American elite, non-Jewish European Americans are by far the most underrepresented group of all. In fact, Jews are vastly over-represented by proportion of population and vastly over-represented over far better qualified non-Jewish students! Their over-representation Harvard and in the Ivy League is not only incredibly disproportionate against European American students, but also wildly disproportionate against every other racial group in America. Above: Here is a chart showing the appalling lack of true diversity at Harvard and the Ivy League.Jews are dramatically over-represented in comparison with every ethnic/racial group in America. In comparison with European Americans, Jewsare almost 47 times more represented than their population would merit. Thats four thousand seven hundred percent over-represented in comparison with the actualpopulation of Jews and European Americans! 68 Percent of the population of America is European American allowed 20 percent of students. Jews are 1.8 percent of college age Americans and given 25 percent of the admissions. Even though European Americans founded Harvard, Americas most important university, and are almost 70 percent of the American population, the university is now under powerful Jewish influence, to the point that only about 20 percent of the students at Americas premier university are European Americans.(1) Harvard and the Ivy Leaguepractice a blatant racist discrimination against better-qualified students and only allows Whites to make up 20 percent of the Harvard student bodyas compared to allotting 25 percent of it to Jews, who are only 1.8 percent of the American population. It should be notedthat Jews are the most privileged by far of any other identifiable group in the United States by income and influence. Jewish studentsare also dramatically over-represented in comparison with Asians, Hispanics and African Americans as well as in comparison with European-descended students. So this Jewish privilege and preference is also over every non-Jewish group in America. In fact as Ron Unz points out in the Myth of American Meritocracy, (2) Jewish racism is accelerating at Harvard. He documents that between 2000 and 2011, only the Jewish group increased in percentages at Harvard, while every other group fell. The Jewish increase of 35 percent was above an alreadyoutrageous Jewish over-representation. So, in fact, Jews are the real kings of racist privilege in America, and this is especially true in the most important elite universities of America which admittedly are the primary source of the ruling elite of the American establishment. European Americans who founded these great universities and who are 68 percent of the population, are the most discriminated against, of all groups, and dramatically so! Some European American high level students harbor resentment against African American students for affirmative action discriminatory programs. Conservative politics in America is under the domination of Jewish neoconservatives and they carefully channel European American against African Americans and other races. However, the fact is thatdiscrimination against European American students, especially in the highest levels of academia, is far more likely to be on behalf of Jews than African-Americans. Furthermore, the concept and implementation of affirmative action programs of racial discrimination were not initiated by African Americans, but by Jewish Supremacists. Thereare, italso must be pointed out, other programs of discrimination against European Americans which have not been created and imposed by African-Americans, but by the Jewish Supremacists who enjoy the ultimate racist privilege in America. Racist Discrimination Against Better Qualified Non-Jewish Students Discrimination at Harvard is not simply demographic. Jewsat Harvardand across the Ivy Leagueare over-represented by the factor of 13 times higher numbers than their merit would justify! Jewish over-representation has come about because of racial discrimination against better qualified European Americans and for less-qualified Jewish students. The research of a Jewish authority, Ron Unz, demolishes the Jewish master race fantasy and his data proves that Jews are not only vastly over-represented by population in the elite universities like Harvard, but they are also vastly over-representedthan they deserve by merit. Jews, who are less qualified in comparison with European Americans, are over-represented by a factor of more than 13 times higher than their merit would deserve, and almost 6 times over-represented than their abilitywould deserve against Asians.(3) This is easilyproven by comparing groups of the top performing students of the United States with the National Merit Scholarships.One can simply compare the percentage of Jews who score in the highest levels inthe National Merit Scholarships compared to Gentile groups such as Asian, African, Hispanic and European-American performance on what is the best predictive gauge of student qualification and ability before college. When one compares the Jewish and Gentile National Merit Scholarship qualifiers with the admissions to the top universities, one can easily judge the relationship between academic performance and actual university admission at Harvard and other schools. Of course, there is one ultimate way to most accurately compare the relative ability of a group to perform well at Harvard or any elite educational institution: to simply examine how the groups compare in achievement after four years at the institution. Demolishing The Myth of Jewish Intellectual Superiority When one points out that Jews are vastly over-represented compared to other groups in the elite universities, in Media, in banking and among top government administrators, theJewish media constantly presents images of Jews as intellectually superior in comparison with other people. The Jewish dominated media constantly produces images of brilliant, Einstein-like Jews and produce constant images that Jews have asuperior work ethic than non-Jews. If one dares to point out thevast Jewish domination of academia or of any part of society, the counter-argument is that Jews are just smarter than anyone else. The suggestion is that Jews are dominant at Harvard and the Ivy League, or for that matter in Hollywood or banking is because they are themost capable and that they earned it through their merit. If this argument were valid, it would have to prove they were indeed markedly smarter, work harder, and just as importantly, that higher performing Jewswould outnumber their Gentile competitors on a per-capita basis and in actual numbers. Of course, that idea is ludicrous when you look at the tiny percentage of Jews in America. Even if the performance levels of Asians and European Americans wereless on average than Jews, the reality is that there are many more non-Jews than Jews. The only rational explanation for this difference would be that other factors are responsible for the Jewish dominance in academia. In fact, the best gauge of a groups ability to perform well in an elite university is not how they perform on a preparatory test or even in past academic performance, but to simply look at the performance of those respective groups at the completion of their studies. There is a simple and elegant way to determine the best performing students. It is called Phi Beta Kappa, the premier honors society of academic excellence in America. Phi Beta Kappa recipients at Harvardmake upabout the top ten percent of students. It is based on an extremely high grade point average of 3.75 (out of 4) and a rigorous Arts and Sciences curriculum, the inclusion of advanced math classes and foreign language proficiency. As pointed out previously, European American students are markedly outnumbered by Jewish students at Harvard. European-Americans are just 20 percent of the Harvard students as compared to Jews, who are 25 percent. The numerical disadvantage to European Americans is like a basketball team limited to 4 players which must compete against a Jewish team with 5 players. Yet,what percentage of total Phi Beta Kappa recipients at Harvard are European Americans, and what percentage are Jews? Jews 11 percent European Americans 54 percent Asian Americans 35 percent Jews greatly outnumber European Americans at Harvard, but are only 11 percent of Phi Beta Kappa achievers. (4) The numerically fewer European Americans occupy 54 percent of the Phi Beta Kappa positions. On a per capita basis, European Americans are more than 5 times (500 percent) as likely to achieve Phi Beta Kappa status and the highest academic achievements at Harvard as are Jewish students. Harvard is the elite university of America. Even though its administration is dominated by Jewish administrators and faculty, and although Jewish students outnumber European Americans Jews achieve the elite Phi Beta Kappa status at a small fraction of White students. Consideringthat the Harvard administration permits European Americans to beonly 20 percent of the Harvard student body,it indicates that huge numbers of European Americans of the highest abilities are facing racist discrimination at Harvard, in the Ivy League, and other Jewish-dominated elite universities. So who is Behind the Jewish Supremacism at Harvard The clear racial discrimination shown here against European Americans, Asians and others on behalf of Jewish students, begs the question of how and why. The conclusion is inescapable. There is a clear Jewish domination of the faculty and staff of Harvard University and the rest of the Ivy League. Using their positions of power they have systematically and deliberately discriminated against non-Jews in both admissions and faculty hires, and once they achieved their supremacy over these institutions they have protected and maintained their power. Jewish supremacist racism surrounding the appointment and tenure of the Harvard Law School, by far the most important Law School in the United States, illustrates the dynamics of Jewish Supremacism. Elana Kagan, now a Supreme Court justice, was appointed to Dean of Harvard Law School by the Jewish President at the time, Lawrence Summers. Kaganwent on to give over 50 percent of her faculty appointments at the most important, the pinnacle law school in America, to her fellow Jewish tribalists.(5) Under Dean Kagan, Jews, who are only 2 percent of the adult population of America, received over 50% of faculty appointments. It is simple math to show Kagans massive discrimination against non-Jews resulted in a 2,400 percent over-representation in her appointments compared to the Jewish percentage of population. Her Harvard law position and Jewish tribal alliances and influence in politics enabled her to become what must be one of the most under-qualified appointments to the Supreme Court in its history. She joined two other Jews on the Supreme Court tomake up part of a vast Jewish over-representation on that critical body. Is there any sound reason that her decisions on the Supreme Court will not reflect her Jewish allegiances as reflected in hertenure at Harvard? The clear facts of Jewish racism and discrimination at the highest echelons of academia at Harvard and in the Ivy League would suggest that the dominance of Hollywood, banking, and political organizations could all be similarly influencedby this Jewishracism of Jewish preference and privilege and accompanied by racial discrimination against those not chosen. What is the mechanism of theJewish takeover of academia? There aretwo critical components of the Jewish takeover of academia in America. The primary mechanismthe aforementioned Jewish tribalism in which Jews often support fellow Jews in the same way Kagan gave 50 percent of her appointments to fellow Jews. The second is the structure of college admissions in America in which Diversity is now the key word in college admissions. At Harvard the impact of diversity can be seen in the fact that some Harvard applicants who have perfect high school records in excellent schools and perfect SAT entrance examinations are not admitted in favor of students with far worse academic records and far lower test scores. Universities are now evaluating the personality and intangible qualities of individual students. Of course, universities are supposed to selecting the students who are best at academic and intellectualperformance the same way that athletes are selected for athletic performance. In the name of diversity then, academic credentials, abilities, and performance can take a back seat to the intangibles. In the interviews and the selection process then personal prejudices and bias of the administrators can play a huge role in selection because there isno longer any objectivity based on testing and prior performance. Now a critical factor is the subjectivity of the administrators doing the admissions process. This is why Jews havean incredible13 times, or 1,300 percent over-representation than their actual academic merit would allow. In the name of diversity academic performance is put in the back seat, and Jewish administrators are free to select fellow Jews for admissions, graduate programs and academic appointments such as in the Kagan case. Of course, diversity is the idea that institutions should reflect the diversity of the underlying population and demographics of the region or nation and that there should be fair and equitable representation. What kind of diversity gives one group massive over-representation andall other groups massive under-representation, with the largest population segment of the United States the smallest proportion of representation. That is the greatest irony of all. In the name of diversity, America has its elite selected by group that is only 2 percent of the population and gives its owngroup a massive over-representation in the universities that are the source of the American elite. This is the real privilege in America. It is not White Privilege when 96 percent of the White populationare discriminated against in favor of a select 4 percent. When the 70 percent White population who has more than 70 percent of the most outstanding students in America are accorded only 20 percent of Harvard and Ivy League admissions. Postscript: NY Times Boasts ofthe Jewish Takeover of America The most prominent NY Times Columnist, David Brooks, wrote a column called The Chosen, Getting In. The article talksabout a book by a Jewish Professor James Karabel who a book called The Chosen, which discusses the Jewish takeover of the Ivy League. In the first paragraph of the article, Brooks talks about his giving a lecture on the substance of Karabels book. He points out that after his speech an obviously Jewish woman came up to him and said, What you are talking about it the Jewish takeover of America. Here is an excerpt from my new book, The Illustrated Protocols of Ziondue outlater this year: One thing about many Jews, in their chutzpah they just cant help but boast. I am glad he does, for he is telling the truth. The Jews, just 2 percent of the American population, have taken over American academia and the American elite. They have taken over not because this 2 percent has a majority of the intelligence in America. They are respectably intelligent, but their weapon of conquest is not their cleverness, but their their ultra-racism and their racial discrimination. Those are the devices their elite has used to depose the European American elite that created America, the American academia,and who today oppress not just European Americans but all Americans who dont want to ruled over by a alien, racist oligarchy. If ethnic oppression and exploitation is immoral, then should we not rise up, all of us, and free ourselves from this racist, Jewish supremacism? Endingthisracist suppression is not only important for European Americans but for all Americans of every race and ethnicity. Dr. David Duke2014 Sources: (1) Harvard enrollment for the class entering 2010: Asian 16% Black non-Hispanic 7% Hispanic 8% International 10% Mixed 3% Unknown 12% Jewish 24% White non-Hispanic Non-Jewish 19% Sources: Harvard Provost Office: Degree Student Enrollment, 2010, Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life ). (2)Unz, Ron: The Myth of American Meritocracy: How corrupt are Ivy League admissions? The American Conservative, November 28, 2012. (3)Unz, Ron: The Myth of American Meritocracy: Quantitative Sources and Methods, The American Conservative website, Appendix G, November 21, 2012). (4) Ibid. (5)Slattery, Patrick: Elena Kagans diversity problem and Jewish privilege The Occidental Observer, September 2, 2012).

Fair Usage Law

July 1, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Menorah Lighting at White House:Celebrating Jewish Racism …

The now annual lighting this week of a giant menorah in front of the White House symbolizes not only the power grab made by Jewish Supremacists over the United States, but also their controlled mass medias deliberate suppression of the facts around Hanukah. The Jewish Supremacists who control the mass media like to pretend that Hanukkah is simply some sort of Jewish version of Christmas. Hanukkah is actually a celebration of Jewish racism, Jewish supremacy and Jewish separatism. It commemorates the radical Jewish Maccabees mass murder of Greeks and Syrians as well as Jews who dared to assimilate and be tolerant of one another. It is actually a Jewish religious and historical symbol of Jewish dedication to non-Assimilation with non-Jews! The celebrated even concerns the theMaccabean Revoltagainst theMacedonian-ruled Seleucid Empireof the 2nd century BC. Seleucid Empire king Antiochus IV Epiphanes (c. 215 BC 164 BC), having experienced trouble with the Hebrews within his empires borders, mistakenly thought that fully accepting Jews into Greek institutions and promoting marriage and assimilation between Greeks and Jews would help prevent the terrorism and violence of Jewish radical sects. Actually the Greek willingness to assimilate and willingness of many Jews to assimilate only inflamed the Jewish radicals even more. Some Jews went along with this assimilation process, but many extremists among that communitysome sources say the majorityopposed it. offer offer a sacrifice to an idol. Mattathias sonJudah Maccabeethen gathered together a Jewish army and, after a protracted terrorist campaign, was victorious over first the Hellenized Jews and then Seleucid forces. After the Maccabees entered Jerusalem in triumph and ritually cleansed theTemple, they re-established traditionalJewish worship there. According to the story, the victorious Maccabees could only find a small jug of oil that enough to sustain thelit Menorahfor one day, but it lasted for eight days, by which time further oil could be procuredhence the lighting ceremony of the menorah which forms a major processional part of the celebration. A large Seleucid army was sent to quash the revolt, but returned to Syria on the death of Antiochus IV. Its commander Lysias, preoccupied with internal Seleucid affairs, agreed to a political compromise that restored religious freedom and the dispute ended. The important point here is that the festival of Hanukah actually celebrates Jewish separatism and a victorious Jewish campaign against assimilationnot a season of gifts or goodwill, as the media pretends. The lighting of the menorah in front of the White House in actual fact is celebrating the halting of intermarriage and assimilation. Imagine for a second any religion publicly celebrating its desire to be spateand then getting the White House to endorse it! At the same time, the Jewish Supremacists who publicly celebrate their separateness in this way, are the forefront of telling everyone else to integrate. One law for the Jewish Supremacists, one law for the Gentiles.

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Racism in Israel – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Racism in Israel refers to all forms and manifestations of racism experienced in Israel, irrespective of the colour or creed of the perpetrator and victim, or their citizenship, residency, or visitor status. More specifically in the Israeli context, however, racism in Israel refers to racism directed against Israeli Arabs by Israeli Jews,[1] intra-Jewish racism between the various Jewish ethnic divisions (in particular against Ethiopian Jews,[2] and to historic current racism towards Mizrahi Jews and Jews of colour), and racism on the part of Israeli Arabs against Israeli Jews. Racism on the part of Israeli Jews against Muslim Arabs in Israel exist in institutional policies, personal attitudes, the media, education, immigration rights, housing,[3] social life and legal policies. Some elements within the Ashkenazi Israeli Jewish population have also been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards fellow Jews of other backgrounds, including against Ethiopian Jews, Indian Jews, Mizrahi Jews, Sephardi Jews, etc. Although intermarriage between Ashkenazim and Sephardim/Mizrahim is increasingly common in Israel, and social integration is constantly improving, disparities continue to persist. Ethiopian Jews in particular have faced discrimination from non-Black Jews. It has been suggested that the situation of the Ethiopian Jews as ‘becoming white’ is similar to that of some European immigrants like Poles and Italians who arrived in the United States in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.[4] Israel has broad anti-discrimination laws that prohibit discrimination by both government and nongovernment entities on the basis of race, religion, and political beliefs, and prohibits incitement to racism.[5] The Israeli government and many groups within Israel have undertaken efforts to combat racism. Israel is a state-party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and is a signatory of the Convention against Discrimination in Education. Israel’s President Reuven Rivlin announced to a meeting of academics in October 2014 that it is finally time for Israel to live up to its promise as a land of equality, time to cure the epidemic of racism. “Israeli society is sick, and it is our duty to treat this disease,” Rivlin stated.[6] According to Sammy Smooha, a Professor of Sociology at the University of Haifa, the answer to the question of whether racism exists in Israel depends on the definition of racism adopted. If Pierre L. van den Berghe’s view is adopted, that the term racism must be restricted to beliefs that a given biological race is superior, then ethnocentrism can be found in Israel, but not racism. According to other definitions, racism is a belief that membership in a certain group, not necessarily genetic or biological, determines the qualities of individuals. By this definition, racist views are present in portions of the Israeli population.[7] Smooha adds that some Arab and Jewish writers make accusations of racism, but they use the term in a very loose way.[7] A report written by the Israeli Foreign Ministry describes Israel as a multi-ethnic, multicultural, multi-religious, and multi-lingual society, which has a high level of informal segregation patterns. The report states that groups are not separated by official policy, but that Israel has a number of different sectors within the society are somewhat segregated and maintain their strong cultural, religious, ideological, and/or ethnic identity. The report maintains that in spite of the existing social cleavages and economic disparities, the political systems and the courts represent strict legal and civic equality. The Israeli Foreign Ministry describes the country as “Not a melting pot society, but rather more of a mosaic made up of different population groups coexisting in the framework of a democratic state”[8] Racism against Arabs on the part of the Israeli state and some Israeli Jews has been identified by critics in personal attitudes, the media, education, immigration rights, housing segregation, and social life. Nearly all such characterizations have been denied by the state of Israel. The Or Commission, set up to explain the October 2000 unrest in many Israeli Arab communities found, “The state and generations of its government failed in a lack of comprehensive and deep handling of the serious problems created by the existence of a large Arab minority inside the Jewish state. Government handling of the Arab sector has been primarily neglectful and discriminatory. The establishment did not show sufficient sensitivity to the needs of the Arab population, and did not take enough action in order to allocate state resources in an equal manner. The state did not do enough or try hard enough to create equality for its Arab citizens or to uproot discriminatory or unjust phenomenon.”[9] According to the 2004 U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for Israel and the Occupied Territories, the Israeli government had done “little to reduce institutional, legal, and societal discrimination against the country’s Arab citizens.”[10] The 2005 US Department of State report on Israel wrote: “[T]he government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas, including… institutional, legal, and societal discrimination against the countrys Arab citizens.”[11] The 2010 U.S. State Department Country Report stated that Israeli law prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, and that government effectively enforced these prohibitions.[12] Former Likud MK and Minister of Defense Moshe Arens has criticized the treatment of minorities in Israel, saying that they did not bear the full obligation of Israeli citizenship, nor were they extended the full privileges of citizenship.[13] Israel is a state-party to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. According to the 1998 Report of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination found that the Convention “is far from fully implemented in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and that the shortfall contributes very significantly to the dangerous escalation of tension in the region.”. The report positively noted the measures taken by Israel to prohibit the activities of racist political parties, the amendment of the Equal Opportunity in Employment Law, prohibiting discrimination in the labour sphere on the grounds of national ethnic origin, country of origin, beliefs, political views, political party, affiliation or age, and the Israeli efforts to reduce and eventually eradicate the economic and educational gap between the Jewish majority and the Arab minority.[14] The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) published reports documenting racism in Israel, and the 2007 report suggested that anti-Arab racism in the country was increasing. One analysis of the report summarized it thus: “Over two-thirds Israeli teens believe Arabs to be less intelligent, uncultured and violent. Over a third of Israeli teens fear Arabs all together….The report becomes even grimmer, citing the ACRI’s racism poll, taken in March 2007, in which 50% of Israelis taking part said they would not live in the same building as Arabs, will not befriend, or let their children befriend Arabs and would not let Arabs into their homes.”[15] The 2008 report from ACRI says the trend of increasing racism is continuing.[16] An Israeli minister charged the poll as biased and not credible.[17] The Israeli government spokesman responded that the Israeli government was “committed to fighting racism whenever it raises it ugly head and is committed to full equality to all Israeli citizens, irrespective of ethnicity, creed or background, as defined by our declaration of independence”.[17] Isi Leibler of the Jerusalem Center for Public affairs argues that Israeli Jews are troubled by “increasingly hostile, even treasonable outbursts by Israeli Arabs against the state” while it is at war with neighboring countries,[18] Another 2007 report, by the Center Against Racism, also found hostility against Arabs was on the rise. Among its findings it reported that 75% of Israeli Jews don’t approve of Arabs and Jews sharing apartment buildings; that over half of Jews wouldn’t want to have an Arab boss and that marrying an Arab amounts to “national treason”; and that 55% of the sample thought Arabs should be kept separate from Jews in entertainment sites. Half wanted the Israeli government to encourage Israeli Arabs to emigrate. About 40% believed Arab citizens should have their voting rights removed.[19] A March 2010 poll by Tel Aviv University found that 49.5% of Israeli Jewish high school students believe Israeli Arabs should not be entitled to the same rights as Jews in Israel. 56% believe Arabs should not be eligible to the Knesset, the Israeli parliament.[20] An October 2010 poll by the Dahaf polling agency found that 36% of Israeli Jews favor eliminating voting rights for non-Jews.[21] In recent polling (20032009) between 42% and 56% of Israelis agreed that “Israeli Arabs suffer from discrimination as opposed to Jewish citizens;” 80% of Israeli Arabs agreed with that statement in 2009.[22] A 2012 poll revealed widespread support among Israeli Jews for discrimination against Israeli Arabs.[23] In November 2014, after two Arabs from East Jerusalem perpetrated a massacre in a Jerusalem synagogue by using axes, knives, and a gun, the mayor of Ashkelon, Itamar Shimoni, announced that he planned to fire city construction workers who were Arab. His action brought a storm of protest from politicians as well as the prime minister and president. Police in Ashkelon said they would ignore Shimoni’s directive and “obey the law.”[24]Nir Barkat, mayor of Jerusalem, said “We cannot discriminate the Arabs,” and added “I cannot help but think of where we were 70 years ago in Europe. We cannot generalize as they did to Jews. Here in Jerusalem, we have tens of thousands of Arab workers. We must make a clear distinction.”[25] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said “We should not discriminate against an entire public because of a small minority that is violent and militant.” Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz said it is “sad that relations between Jews and Arabs will suffer because of some Jihadist fanatical terrorists.” He said that on the one hand “one can understand the fear of parents of kindergarten children afraid someone will take a knife one day, as happened in the synagogue in Jerusalem, shout ‘Allah Akhbar’ and begin to attack.” On the other hand, he said, “this is something that should be handled while keeping the generally good relations between Jews and Arabs.”[26] In spite of the almost universal condemnation of Shimoni’s plan by Israeli politicians, a poll by Channel 10 showed that 58% of Israelis support the discriminatory practice, 32% did not approve and 10% did not know.[27] At the end the mayor changed his mind. Yehiel Lasri, mayor of nearby Ashdod, allegedly targeted Arab workers for extra security checks.[28] Some authors, such as David Hirsi and Ayala Emmet, have criticized the Israeli media for portraying Arabs negatively.[29][30] The Israeli media has been described as “racist” in its portrayals of Israeli-Arabs and Palestinians by Israeli-Arab Nabilia Espanioly [31] Israel is a signatory of the Convention against Discrimination in Education, and ratified it in 1961. The convention has the status of law in Israeli courts.[32] Israeli Pupils Rights Law of 2000 prohibits discrimination of students for sectarian reasons in admission to or expulsion from educational institutions, in establishment of separate educational curricula or holding of separate classes in the same educational institution.[33] According to a 2001 report by Human Rights Watch, Israel’s school systems for Arab and Jewish children are separate and have unequal conditions to the disadvantage of the Arab children who make up one quarter of all students. Israeli law does not prohibit Palestinian Arab parents from enrolling their children in Jewish schools, but in practice, very few Palestinian Arab parents do so.[32][34] The report stated that “Government-run Arab schools are a world apart from government-run Jewish schools. In virtually every respect, Palestinian Arab children get an education inferior to that of Jewish children, and their relatively poor performance in school reflects this.”[35][36][37] In 1999, in an attempt to close the gap between Arab and Jewish education sectors, the Education Minister of Israel announced an affirmative action policy which promised that Arabs would be granted 25% of the education budget, proportionally more funding than their 18% of the population, and supported the creation of an Arab academic college.[38] A 2009 study from the Hebrew University’s School of Education demonstrated that the Israeli Education Ministry’s budget for special assistance to students from low socioeconomic backgrounds “severely” discriminated against Arabs. The study found that because there were more needy Arab students, but fewer Arab students overall, educationally needy Jewish students receive anywhere from 3.8 to 6.9 times as much funding as equally needy Arab students. The Education Ministry said in response to the report that a decision has already been made to abandon this allocation method.[39] The Follow-Up Committee for Arab Education notes that the Israeli government spends an average of $192 per year on each Arab student compared to $1,100 per Jewish student. The drop-out rate for Arab citizens of Israel is twice as high as that of their Jewish counterparts (12 percent versus 6 percent). The same group also notes that there is a 5,000-classroom shortage in the Arab sector.[40][verification needed] A 2007 report of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination noted that separate sectors are maintained for Jewish and Arab education. It recommended that Israel should assess the extent to which maintenance of separate Arab and Jewish sectors “may amount to racial segregation”, and that mixed Arab-Jewish communities and schools, and intercultural education should be promoted.[41] In a 2008 report, Israel responded that parents are entitled to enroll their children in the educational institution of their choice, whether the spoken language is Hebrew, Arabic or bilingual. It also noted that Israel promotes a variety of programs that promote intercultural cooperation, tolerance and understanding [34][42] In Palestine in Israeli School Books: Ideology and Propaganda in Education, Nurit Peled-Elhanan, a professor of language and education at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, describes the depiction of Arabs in Israeli schoolbooks as racist. She states that their only representation is as refugees, primitive farmers and terrorists, claiming that in “hundreds and hundreds” of books, not one photograph depicted an Arab as a “normal person”.[43] Arnon Groiss of the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace criticized these findings. After reviewing the same books examined by Peled-Ehanan, Groiss concluded that “Peled-Ehanan’s claim regarding this point is clearly false … This heavily politicized and thus biased approach distorts the material to produce a picture to her liking.” Groiss further criticized the work of Peled-Elhanan for stretching the definition of racism to include cases that researchers would normally categorize as ethnocentrism.[44] The Jewish National Fund is a private organization established in 1901 to buy and develop land in the Land of Israel for Jewish settlement; land purchases were funded by donations from world Jewry exclusively for that purpose.[45] Discrimination has been claimed regarding ownership and leasing of land in Israel, because approximately 13% of Israel’s land, owned by the Jewish National Fund, is restricted to Jewish ownership and tenancy, and Arabs are prevented from buying or leasing that land.[46] In the early 2000s, several Community settlement in the Negev and the Galilee were accused of barring Arab applicants from moving in. In 2010, the Knesset passed legislation that allowed admissions committees to function in smaller communities in the Galilee and the Negev, while explicitly forbidding committees to bar applicants based on the basis of race, religion, sex, ethnicity, disability, personal status, age, parenthood, sexual orientation, country of origin, political views, or political affiliation.[47][48] Critics, however, say the law gives the privately run admissions committees a wide latitude over public lands, and believe it will worsen discrimination against the Arab minority.[49] Some critics of Israel equate Zionism with racism, or describe Zionism itself as racist or discriminatory.[51] In 1975, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 3379, which concluded that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”[52][53] During debate on the resolution, U.S. ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan argued that Zionism “clearly is not a form of racism,” defining racism as “an ideology… which favors discrimination on the grounds of alleged biological differences.”[54] The resolution was based on the UN’s own definition of racial discrimination, adopted in 1965. According to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, racial discrimination is “any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.”[55] The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. Speaking to the General Assembly, George H. W. Bush said “…to equate Zionism with the intolerable sin of racism is to twist history and forget the terrible plight of Jews in World War II and indeed throughout history.” Supporters of Zionism, such as Chaim Herzog, argue that the movement is non-discriminatory and contains no racist aspects.[50] Some critics have described the Law of Return, which allows all Jews and persons of some Jewish descent to immigrate to Israel as racist, as Palestinian refugees are not eligible for citizenship.[56]Palestinians and advocates for Palestinian refugee rights criticize the Law of Return, which they compare to the Palestinian claim to a right of return.[57] These critics consider the Law, as contrasted against the denial of the right of Palestinian refugees to return, as offensive and as institutionalized ethnic discrimination.[58] Supporters of the Law argue that it is consistent with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Article I(3) which allows for preferential treatments of some groups for purpose of immigration, provided there is no discrimination against a specific nationality.[59][60][61] In addition, proponents of the law point out that in addition to Israel, several other countries provide immigration privileges to individuals with ethnic ties to these countries. Examples include Germany,[62]Serbia, Greece, Japan, Turkey, Ireland, Russia, Italy, Spain, Chile, Poland and Finland[61] (See Right of return and Repatriation laws.) Some supporters noted that the decision by the Venice Commission recognized the relationship between ethnic minorities and their kin-states as legitimate and even desirable, and preference in immigration and naturalization is mentioned as an example of legitimate preference.[61] In response to Arab criticism of Israel’s Law of Return as discriminatory in a 1975 United Nations resolution debate, Israelis argued that Palestinian Israelis were not subject to any legal discrimination.[54] In 2010 the Israeli cabinet proposed an amendment to the Citizenship Act requiring all future non-Jews applying for Israeli citizenship to swear loyalty to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. The proposal met harsh criticism, including accusations of racism, and subsequently it was amended to make the loyalty oath universal to both Jewish and non-Jewish naturalized citizens. Even in this new form, the bill did not pass due to lack of majority support in the Israeli parliament.[63][64][65][66][66][67] Israel’s Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law bars immigration by family reunification to couples of an Israeli citizen and a Palestinian resident of the Israeli-occupied territories. Amnesty International says this mostly affects Arabs.[68][69] The law has been condemned by Amnesty International as “racial discrimination”.[70] The government says the law say it is aimed at preventing terrorist attacks. Some leaders of the Kadima party support the law in order to preserve the state’s Jewish character. Mishael Cheshin, one of supreme court judges who upheld the law, wrote that “at a time of war the state could prevent the entry of enemy subjects to its territory even if they were married to citizens of the state”.[71] Rabbi David Batzri and his son Yitzhak were investigated by police after they made racist remarks against Arabs and protested against a mixed Arab-Jewish school in Jerusalem.[72][73] As part of a 2008 plea bargain, Yitzhak was sentenced to community service, and David issued a declaration saying he was opposed to any racist incitement and said that he calls for love, brotherhood and friendship.[74] Dov Lior, Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba in the southern West Bank and head of the “Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria” issued a religious edict saying “a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew’s fingernail”[75][76][77] and stated that captured Arab terrorists could be used to conduct medical experiments,[78] and also ruled that Jewish Law forbids employing Arabs or renting homes to them.[79][80] Lior denied holding racist views.[81] In June 2011 the Rabbi was arrested by Israeli police and questioned on suspicion of inciting violence.[82][83] Both opposition leader Tzipi Livni and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a full judicial investigation of Lior’s remarks and said that rabbis were not above the law.[84] In October 2010, Ovadia Yosef, a former Sephardi chief rabbi, stated that the sole purpose of non-Jews “is to serve Jews”.[85] His statement was harshly condemned by several Jewish organizations.[86][87] On 7 Dec 2010, a group of 50 state-paid rabbis signed a letter instructing Orthodox Jews not to rent or sell houses to non-Jews. The letter was later endorsed by some 250 other Jewish religious figures. A hotline was opened for denouncing those Jews who did intend to rent out to Arabs.[88][89] On 19 Dec 2010, a rally attended by 200 people was held in Bat Yam against the “assimilation” of young Jewish women with Arabs. One of the organizers, “Bentzi” Ben-Zion Gopstein, said that the motives are not racist: “It is important to explain that the problem is religious, not racist. If my son were to decide to marry an Arab woman who converted, I wouldn’t have a problem with that. My problem is the assimilation that the phenomenon causes.” One of the protestors called out, “Any Jewish woman who goes with an Arab should be killed; any Jew who sells his home to an Arab should be killed.” Bat Yam Mayor Shlomo Lahyani condemned the event, saying “The city of Bat Yam denounces any racist phenomenon. This is a democratic country,”. Nearby, about 200 residents of Bat Yam held a counter protest, waving signs reading, “We’re fed up with racists” and “Jews and Arabs refuse to be enemies”. Later that month, the wives of 27 rabbis signed a letter calling on Jewish girls to stay away from Arab men. The document stated: “Don’t date them, don’t work where they work and don’t perform National Service with them.”[90][91][92] A senior Catholic spokesman, Fr Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Custodian of the Holy Land, has claimed that a lack of police action, and an educational culture in which Jewish pupils are encouraged to act with “contempt” towards Christians, has resulted in life becoming increasingly “intolerable” for many Christians. In 2012, pro-settler extremists attacked a Trappist monastery in the town of Latroun covering walls with anti-Christian graffiti denouncing Christ as a “monkey”, and the 11th century Monastery of the Cross was daubed with offensive slogans such as “Death to Christians”. According to an article in the Telegraph, Christian leaders feel that the most important issue that Israel has failed to address is the practice of some ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools to teach children that it is a religious obligation to abuse anyone in Holy Orders they encounter in public, “such that Ultra-Orthodox Jews, including children as young as eight, spit at members of the clergy on a daily basis.”[93] Incidents of spitting on Christian clergymen in Jerusalem have been common since the 1990s.[94][95] Ruling on the case of a Greek Orthodox priest who had struck a yeshiva student who spat near him in 2011, a Jerusalem magistrate wrote, “Day after day, clergymen endure spitting by members of those fringe groups a phenomenon intended to treat other religions with contempt. … The authorities are not able to eradicate this phenomenon and they don’t catch the spitters, even though this phenomenon has been going on for years.”[96] In 1994, a Jewish settler in the West Bank and follower of the Kach party, Baruch Goldstein, massacred 29 Palestinian Muslim worshipers at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron.[97][98] During his funeral, a rabbi declared that even one million Arabs are “not worth a Jewish fingernail”.[99][100][101] Goldstein was immediately “denounced with shocked horror even by the mainstream Orthodox”,[102] and many in Israel classified Goldstein as insane.[103] The Israeli government condemned the massacre and made Kach illegal.[104] The Israeli army killed a further nine Palestinians during riots following the massacre,[105] and the Israeli government severely restricted Palestinian freedom of movement in Hebron,[106] while letting settlers and foreign tourists roam free,[107] although Israel also forbade certain Israeli settlers from entering Palestinian towns and demanded that those settlers turn in their army-issued rifles.[108] Goldstone’s grave has become a pilgrimage site for Jewish extremists.[109] In 2006, a stabbing incident took place when a gang of Russian immigrants chanting racist slogans stabbed and lightly injured Arab Knesset member Abbas Zakour, which was part of a “stabbing rampage” and was described as a “hate crime”.[114] The Mossawa Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel reported a tenfold increase in racist incidents against Arabs in 2008.[115] Jerusalem reported the highest number of racist incidents against Arabs.[115] The report blamed Israeli leaders for the violence, saying “These attacks are not the hand of fate, but a direct result of incitement against the Arab citizens of this country by religious, public, and elected officials.”[115] The Bedouin claim they face systemic discrimination and have submitted a counter-report to the United Nations that disputes the Israeli government’s official state report.[116] They claim they are not treated as equal citizens in Israel and that Bedouin towns are not provided the same level of services or land that Jewish towns of the same size are, and that they are not given fair access to water.[116] The city of Beersheba refused to recognize a Bedouin holy site, despite a High Court recommendation.[116] In late 2010, the number of racist incidents against Arabs increased. The events were described by the Defense Minister of Israel, Ehud Barak, as a “wave of racism.”[117] The most notable ones took place on 20 December 2010, when a group of five Arabs were driven from an apartment in Tel Aviv after their landlady was threatened with the torching of her home if she continued to rent out to Arabs,[118] and on 21 December 2010, when a gang of Jewish youths was arrested in Jerusalem after carrying out a large number of attacks on Arabs. A girl aged 14 would lure Arab men to the Independence Park, where they were attacked with stones and bottles and severely beaten. The teens confessed to nationalistic motives.[119] On 31 Oct 2010, a Jewish mob gathered outside of an Arab students’ residence in Safed, chanted “death to the Arabs,” hurled rocks and bottles at the building, shattering glass, and fired a shot at the building before dissassembling.[120] On May 2011, two Israeli border patrolmen were charged with physical abuse against an Arab minor who was carrying firecrackers. The incident took place in March 2010. The youth was punched, knocked to the floor, kicked, and had death threats thrown against him by the officers. At a police station, the 17-year-old male was tricked by a female police officer into believing he was going to die. After making the prisoner go down on his knees, she allegedly pointed her pistol at him at point-blank range. It was not loaded, but the minor did not know this because his eyes were covered. According to the charges, she counted to 10, with the teen begging her not to kill him. She allegedly pulled the trigger, saying “Death to Arabs.” [121] She was later sentenced to 3 months in prison. [122] In March 2012, two Arab males of Beit Zarzir confessed, after being arrested, to damaging a local school for Arab and Jewish students. They admitted responsibility for having sprayed on the wall of the school, “Death to Arabs”. The school was sprayed twice in February with the slogans “price tag,” “Death to Arabs, and” “Holocaust to the Arabs”.[123][124][125][126] On November 18, 2013, Jewish settlers torched trucks and spray-painted walls in a Palestinian village. Two perpetrators, Yehuda Landsberg and Yehuda Sabir, admitted their guilt and received the minimum sentence. Binyamin Richter, a third defendant, claimed innocence. They are from Havat Gilad.[127] This was the first time that any indictments were issued against the 52 Jewish Israelis who had committed anti-Arab attacks that were completely unprovoked, which the Israeli security forces differentiate from “price tag” attacks.[128] After the murder of 3 Israeli teenagers were found on June 30, 2014, a Facebook Page created by an unknown group of Israelis called “The People of Israel Demand Vengeance!” or “The people of Israel demand revenge!” The page features a myriad of photos of people holding up signs demanding revenge for the killing of the teens, and urging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to order widespread military action in the West Bank and Gaza. Further racist incitement within the Facebook campaign depicted a photograph that was posted to the page with two teenage girls smiling, hugging each other and holding a piece of paper saying, “Hating Arabs is not racism, it’s values.” Another post showed an armed IDF soldier with “Revenge!” in Hebrew inscribed on his chest. The Facebook Campaign received more than 30,000 likes by the evening of July 3, 2014. The campaign has been condemned by a number of Israeli MK’s including Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Minister of Agriculture and Yisrael Beiteinu MK Yair Shamir. The Israeli Defense Forces also vowed to severely punish any soldier involved with the exchange of racist photographs depicting revenge for the murdered teens or retributive incitement of Anti-Arabism across Facebook and other social media sites.[129][130] Also in November 2014 a Druze soldier, veteran of Operation Protective Edge, was refused entry to a pub where his Jewish friends were. A security guard told him that he was not allowed to let non-Jews enter. While the owner claimed it was a private club, Jewish patron denied this claim, noting they were allowed to enter without membership. A friend of the Druse IDF soldier said,”Apparently, they are good enough to fight in Gaza but not to enter a pub.”[131] On November 21, 2014 during a Tel Aviv soccer match, hundreds of Bnei Yehuda fans rose and chanted, “Death to Arabs!” The fans threw trash at an Arab player who was injured and was being taken off the field.[132] On November 29, 2014, an apparent hate crime including arson and racist graffiti was perpetrated in Jerusalem on a dual Hebrew and Arabic language school. Graffiti spray painted at the school included, “Death to Arabs!”, “Kahane was right!”, “Down with assimilation!” and “There is no co-existence with cancer!” Police say the fire was set on purpose. Education Minister Shai Piron spoke out against the vandalism, saying it represented a “violent, criminal and despicable act done to undermine the foundations of Israeli democracy.”[133] Mohamad Marzouk, head of communications for the Hand in Hand school in Kfar Qara, noted that the attack brought out a show of community support for the school. In the minds of many people the arson, he said, “crossed a red line.”[134] The Israeli police arrested a number of suspects in connection with this arson attack.[135] Following the arrest, the mother of one of the suspects said she would have burned the school as well, if it were not illegal to do so, and she expressed disgust and revulsion that Jews and Arabs studied together at the school.[136] In courtroom photos the three members of the radical group are shown smiling and smirking as they faced charges.[137] On 30 November, a synagogue in Tel Aviv had several books burned and was vandalized with graffiti against the Jewish nation-state bill,[138] which most recently, had been submitted the previous week. The Times of Israel reported on January 1, 2015 that three Jewish men who had admitted to committing racist hate crimes against an Arab taxi driver in early 2014 were each sentenced to approximately one year in prison. The criminals admitted they had hailed the cab, then began beating and insulting the cab driver. When the driver escaped the car and ran for help, the perpetrators smashed the taxi sunroof.[139] Racism in soccer stadiums is a worldwide problem, and Israeli stadiums are not free from racism.[141] The first racist incidents took place in the 1970s, when the Arab player Rifaat Turk joined Hapoel Tel Aviv. Turk was subjected to anti-Arab abuse during nearly every game he played.[140] Arab soccer player Abbas Suan was confronted once with a sign reading “Abbas Suan, you don’t represent us”.[142] Under Israeli law, soccer fans can be prosecuted for incitement of racial hatred. The “New Voices from the Stadium” program, run by the New Israel Fund (NIF) amasses a “racism index” that is reported to the media on a weekly basis, and teams have been fined and punished for the conduct of their fans. According to Steve Rothman, the NIF San Francisco director, “Things have definitely improved, particularly in sensitizing people to the existence of racism in Israeli society.”[141] In 2006, Israel joined Football Against Racism in Europe (FARE), network set up to counter racism in soccer.[143] After a soccer game in March 2012, in which Beitar Jerusalem defeated a rival team at Jerusalem’s Teddy Stadium,[144] a group of at least a hundred Beitar fans[145][146][147] entered the nearby Malha Mall chanting racist slogans and allegedly attacked Arab cleaning workers, whom some reports described as Palestinians. The police were criticized for initially failing to make arrests;[148] it later investigated the incident, issuing restraining orders against 20 soccer fans and questioning several suspects among the cleaning crew seen waving sticks at the fans.[149] Some Jewish Israelis of Eastern European descent, known also as Ashkenazim, have been described as viewing themselves as superior to Sephardim and non-Ashkenazi Jews generally. They are accused of maintaining an elite position in Israeli society,[150][151] with some describing the attitudes of Ashkenazim as racist or of being a manifestation of racism.[152] Other authorities describe the discrimination by Ashkenazi as class-based, not race-based.[153][154] For example, the differences between (Mizrahi) Sephardic Jews (N. Africans, Middle Easterners, Yemenites, etc.) are referred to as Adatiyut [155][156][157][158] community-differences (resulting also in some traditional customary gaps).[159] Some sources claim that reports of intra-Jewish discrimination in Israel arise from propaganda published by Arab sources which ignores the normality and harmony between the communities.[160][161] Israeli society in general and Ashkenazi Jews in particular have been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent, known as Mizrahi Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Oriental Jews.[163] A variety of Mizrahi critics of Israeli policy have cited “past ill-treatment, including the maabarot, the squalid tent cities into which Mizrahim were placed upon arrival in Israel; the humiliation of Moroccan and other Mizrahi Jews when Israeli immigration authorities shaved their heads and sprayed their bodies with the pesticide DDT; the socialist elite’s enforced secularization; the destruction of traditional family structure, and the reduced status of the patriarch by years of poverty and sporadic unemployment” as examples of mistreatment.[164] In September 1997, Israeli Labor Party leader Ehud Barak made a high-profile apology to Oriental Jews in Netivot stating: Barak’s address also said that during the 1950s, Mizrahi immigrants were “made to feel that their own traditions were inferior to those of the dominant Ashkenazi [European-origin] Israelis [Alex Weingrod’s paraphrase].”[166] Several prominent Labor party figures, including Teddy Kollek and Shimon Peres, distanced themselves from the apology while agreeing that mistakes were made during the immigration period.[166] The cultural differences between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews impacted the degree and rate of assimilation into Israeli society, and sometimes the divide between Eastern European and Middle Eastern Jews was quite sharp. Segregation, especially in the area of housing, limited integration possibilities over the years.[167] Intermarriage between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim is increasingly common in Israel, and by the late 1990s 28% of all Israeli children had multi-ethnic parents (up from 14% in the 1950s).[168] A 1983 research found that children of inter-ethnic marriages in Israel enjoyed improved socio-economic status.[169] Although social integration is constantly improving, disparities persist. A study conducted by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (ICBS), Mizrahi Jews are less likely to pursue academic studies than Ashkenazi Jews. Israeli-born Ashkenazi are up to twice more likely to study in a university than Israeli-born Mizrahim.[170] Furthermore, the percentage of Mizrahim who seek a university education remains low compared to second-generation immigrant groups of Ashkenazi origin, such as Russians.[171] According to a survey by the Adva Center,[172] the average income of Ashkenazim was 36 percent higher than that of Mizrahim in 2004.[173] Some claim that the education system discriminates against Jewish minorities from North Africa and the Middle East, and one source suggests that “ethnic prejudice against Mizrahi Jews is a relatively general phenomenon, not limited to the schooling process”.[174] There was a case in 2010, when a Haredi school system, where Sephardi and Mizrahi students were sometimes excluded or segregated.[175][176] In 2010, the Israeli supreme court sent a strong message against discrimination in a case involving the Slonim Hassidic sect of the Ashkenazi, ruling that segregation between Ashkenazi and Sephardi students in a school is illegal.[177] They argue that they seek “to maintain an equal level of religiosity, not from racism.”[178] Responding to the charges, the Slonim Haredim invited Sephardi girls to school, and added in a statement: All along, we said it’s not about race, but the High Court went out against our rabbis, and therefore we went to prison.”[179] In the 1950s, 1,033[180] children of Yemenite immigrant families disappeared. In most instances, the parents claim that they were told their children were ill and required hospitalization. Upon later visiting the hospital, it is claimed that the parents were told that their children had died though no bodies were presented or graves which have later proven to be empty in many cases were shown to the parents. Those who believe the theory contend that the Israeli government as well as other organizations in Israel kidnapped the children and gave them for adoption. Secular Israeli Jews of European descent were accused of collaborating in the disappearance of babies of Yemeni Jews and anti religious motives and Anti-religious coercion were alleged,[181][182][183][184][185][186][187] Some went further to accuse the Israeli authorities of conspiring to kidnap the Yemeni children due to “racist” motives.[188] In 2001 a seven-year public inquiry commission concluded that the accusations that Yemenite children were kidnapped are not true. The commission has unequivocally rejected claims of a plot to take children away from Yemenite immigrants. The report determined that documentation exists for 972 of the 1,033 missing children. Five additional missing babies were found to be alive. The commission was unable to discover what happened in another 56 cases. With regard to these unresolved 56 cases, the commission deemed it “possible” that the children were handed over for adoption following decisions made by individual local social workers, but not as part of an official policy.[180] In 1962, authorities in Israel were accused by articles in the Indian press of racism in relation to Jews of Indian ancestry (called Bene Israel).[189][190] In the case that caused the controversy, the Chief Rabbi of Israel ruled that before registering a marriage between Indian Jews and Jews not belonging to that community, the registering rabbi should investigate the lineage of the Indian applicant for possible non-Jewish descent, and in case of doubt, require the applicant to perform conversion or immersion.[189][190] The alleged discrimination may actually be related to the fact that some religious authorities believe that the Bene Israel are not fully Jewish because of inter-marriage during their long separation.[191] In 1964 the government of Israel led by Levi Eshkol declared that it regards Bene Israel of India as Jews without exception, who are equal to other Jews in respect of all matters.[189] Nearly all of the Ethiopian Beta Israel community, a community of Black Jews, resides in Israel. The Israeli government has mounted rescue operations, most notably during Operation Moses (1984) and Operation Solomon (1991), for their migration when civil war and famine threatened populations within Ethiopia.[citation needed] Today 81,000 Israelis were born in Ethiopia, while 38,500 or 32% of the community are native born Israelis.[192] According to the sociologist Prof. Uzi Rebhun, it represents an ambitious attempt to deny the significance of race.[193] Israeli authorities, aware of the situation of most African diaspora communities in other Western countries, hosted programs to avoid setting in patterns of discrimination.[193] The Ethiopian Jewish community’s internal challenges have been complicated by racist attitudes on the part of some elements of Israeli society and the official establishment.[194] Racism has commonly been cited as explanation for policies and programs that failed to meet expectations. Racism was alleged regarding delays in admitting Ethiopian Jews to Israel under the Law of return.[193] The delays in admitting Ethiopians may be attributed to religious motivations rather than racism, since there was debate whether or not Falasha Jews’ (Beta Israel) were Jewish.[195][196] Racism was also alleged in 2009, in a case where school children of Ethiopian ancestry were denied admission into three semi-private religious schools in the town of Petah Tikva. An Israeli government official criticised the Petah Tikva Municipality and the semi-private Haredi schools, saying “This concerns not only the three schools that have, for a long time, been deceiving the entire educational system. For years, racism has developed here undeterred”. Shas spiritual leader Ovadia Yosef threatened to fire any school principal from Shas’s school system who refused to receive Ethiopian students. The Israeli Education Ministry decided to pull the funding from the Lamerhav, Da’at Mevinim and Darkei Noam schools, the three semi-private institutions that refused to accept the students. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke out against the rejection of Ethiopian children, calling it “a moral terror attack.”[197][198] When Ethiopians protested that blood donations from their community were thrown out, Harry Wall the Israeli Director of the The Anti-Defamation League stated that it was the result of the high incidence of HIV in Africans, not racism: “Whatever Israel’s mistakes towards its Ethiopian Jewish community, the cause is not racism.” It explains that “what causes the distress is bureaucratic ineptitude and a cultural gap between a traditional community and a modern, technologically-advanced, highly-competitive nation.”[199] In 2012, Israel appointed the country’s first Ethiopian-born ambassador, Belaynesh Zevadia. According to the foreign minister of Israel, this represents an important milestone in fighting racism and prejudice.[200] In 2010, Israel was accused of a “sterilization policy” aimed towards Ethiopian Jews, for allowing the prescription of contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera to the community.[201][202] They stated that the Israeli government deliberately gives female Ethiopian Jews long-lasting contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera.[201] Jewish agencies involved in immigration said that Ethiopian women were offered different types of contraceptives and that “all of them participated voluntarily in family planning”.[201] Dr. Yifat Bitton, a member of the Israeli Anti-Discrimination Legal Center “Tmura” said that 60 percent of the women receiving this contraceptive are Ethiopian Jews, while Ethiopians made up only 1 percent of population and “the gap here is just impossible to reconcile in any logical manner that would somehow resist the claims of racism”.[201] Professor Zvi Bentwich, an immunologist and human rights activist from Tel-Aviv, rejected the claim and said there’s no ground to suspect a negative official policy towards Ethiopian Jews.[201] Israel initially denied the claim of imposing a sterilization policy on the Ethiopian women,[201] but later admitted to it, and ordered gynaecologists to stop administering the drugs for women of Ethiopian origin if there is concern that they might not understand the ramifications of the treatment.[203] Action on the issue finally took place after a documentary aired in December 2012 on public television. In it, 35 Ethiopian women who had immigrated to Israel said they had been told they would not be allowed into Israel unless they agreed to the shots. While Ethiopians have been admitted to Israel, they are often discriminated against in education and in employment. The Times of Israel notes details of a nurse, unaware of a hidden camera, saying Depo-Provera is given to Ethiopian women because “they forget, they dont understand, and its hard to explain to them, so its best that they receive a shot once every three months basically they dont understand anything.” [204] Thereafter, the Israeli government began an investigation into the policy, and instructed gynecologists not to administer the shots if there is suspicion that the recipient does not fully understand the effects.[205] In April 2015 an Ethiopian soldier in the IDF was the victim of an unprovoked and allegedly racist attack by an Israeli policeman and the attack was caught on video. The soldier, Damas Pakedeh, was arrested and accused of attacking the policeman. He believes the incident was racially motivated and that if the video had not been taken, he would have been punished. Likud MK Avraham Neguise called on National Police Chief Yohanan Danino to prosecute the police officer and volunteer, saying they engaged in a gross violation of the basic law of respecting others and their liberty by those who are supposed to protect us. The Jerusalem Post notes that in 2015 ” there have been a series of reports in the Israeli press about alleged acts of police brutality against Ethiopian Israelis, with many in the community saying they are unfairly targeted and treated more harshly than other citizens.”[206][207] The incident of police brutality with Pakedeh and alleged brutality of officials from Israel’s Administration of Border Crossings, Population and Immigration with Walla Bayach, an Israeli of Ethiopian descent, brought the Ethiopian community to protest. Hundreds of Ethiopians participated in protests the streets of Jerusalem on April 20, 2015 to decry what they view as “rampant racism” and violence in Israel directed at their community. Israel Police Commissioner Yohanan Danino met with representatives of the Israeli Ethiopian community that day following the recent violent incidents involving police officers and members of the community.[208] When over a thousand people protested police brutality against Ethiopians and dark skinned Israelis, Prime MInister Benjamin Netanyahu announced:I strongly condemn the beating of the Ethiopian IDF soldier, and those responsible will be held accountable. [209] Following protests and demonstrations in Tel Aviv that resulted in violence, Netanyahu planned to meet with representatives of the Ethiopian community, including Pakado. Netanyahu said the meeting would include Danino and representatives of several ministries, including Immigrant Absorption. Danino already announced that the officer who beat Pakado had been fired.[210] A 2009 PEW poll, which included 527 Israeli Arab respondents, showed that 35% of Israeli Arabs said their opinion of Jews was unfavorable, while 56% said their opinion was favorable (the figures amongst Israeli Jews on their attitude of themselves were 94% favorable; 6% unfavorable).[citation needed] The 2008 Index of Arab-Jewish Relations in Israel by the Jewish-Arab Center found that 40.5% of the Arab citizens of Israel denied the Holocaust, up from 28% in 2006.[211][212] This report also states that “In Arab eyes disbelief in the very happening of the Shoah is not hate of Jews (embedded in the denial of the Shoah in the West) but rather a form of protest. Arabs not believing in the event of Shoah intend to express strong objection to the portrayal of the Jews as the ultimate victim and to the underrating of the Palestinians as a victim. They deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state that the Shoah gives legitimacy to.”[212] Numerous racist attacks against Jews have taken place throughout Arab localities in the Galilee and in Arab areas of Jerusalem, including murders. Among the people killed in such attacks was Kristine Luken, an American tourist stabbed in a forest near Jerusalem after being seen wearing a Star of David necklace.[213] In Jerusalem, Jews driving through Al-Issawiya have been subjected to ambushes by crowds, as was a repairman who had been hired by a resident.[214] Emergency services vehicles have also been attacked while passing through the neighborhood. Jews who travel to the Mount of Olives also risk violence.[215] Jews who enter or buy property in Arab areas face harassment, and Arabs who have sold property to Jews have been murdered. In 2010, an Israeli-Jewish security guard, Kochav Segal Halevi, was forced from his home in the Arab town of I’billin after a racist crowd gathered at his house, and he received death threats.[216] In 2008, the slogan “Death to the Jews” was found spray-painted in Arabic on the cargo hold of an El Al plane.[217] In 2010, the wall of a synagogue and a Jewish residence in the mixed Jewish-Arab Ajami neighborhood of Jaffa were spray-painted with swastikas and Palestinian flags.[218] In 2014, Arabs from Shfaram murdered Shelly Dadon. Journalist Ben-Meir described Arab Knesset members who “talk incessantly about the Palestinian people’s rights, including their own state” but who “refuse to acknowledge Israel as the state of the Jewish people and deny the very existence of a Jewish people as a nation with national rights” as racist.[219] Ariel Natan Pasko, a policy analyst, suggested that prominent Arab leaders such as Arab member of Knesset Ahmad Tibi is racist because he “turned away from integration” and “wants to build an Arab university in Nazareth, as well as an Arab hospital in the Galilee.”[220] Tibi had been previously accused of racism: in 1997, he said “whoever sells his house to the Jews has sold his soul to Satan and done a despicable act”.[221] The head of the Islamic movement in Israel’s Northern Branch, was charged with incitement to racism and to violence. During legal proceedings, the prosecution said that Sheikh Raed Salah made his inflammatory remarks “with the objective of inciting racism.”[222][223] he also accused Jews of using children’s blood to bake bread.[224] He said, “”We have never allowed ourselves to knead [the dough for] the bread that breaks the fast in the holy month of Ramadan with children’s blood,” he said. “Whoever wants a more thorough explanation, let him ask what used to happen to some children in Europe, whose blood was mixed in with the dough of the [Jewish] holy bread.” Black Hebrew Israelites are groups of people mostly of African American ancestry who believe they are descendants of the ancient Israelites. They are generally not accepted as Jews by the greater Jewish community. Many choose to self-identify as Hebrew Israelites or Black Hebrews rather than as Jews.[225][226][227][228] When the first Black Hebrews arrived in Israel in 1969, they claimed citizenship under the Law of Return, which gives eligible Jews immediate citizenship.[229] The Israeli government ruled in 1973 that the group did not qualify for automatic citizenship, and the Black Hebrews were denied work permits and state benefits. The group responded by accusing the Israeli government of racist discrimination.[230][231] In 1981, a group of American civil rights activist led by Bayard Rustin investigated and concluded that racism was not the cause of Black Hebrews’ situation.[232] In 1990, Illinois legislators helped negotiate an agreement that resolved the Black Hebrews’ legal status in Israel. Members of the group are permitted to work and have access to housing and social services. In 2003 the agreement was revised, and the Black Hebrews were granted permanent resident status.[233][234][235] In his 1992 essay “Blacks and Jews: The Uncivil War”, historian Taylor Branch wrote that Black Hebrews were initially denied citizenship due to anti-black sentiment among Israeli Jews (according to mainstream Jewish religious authorities, members of the Black Hebrew Israelite group are not Jewish).[236][237] According to historian Dr. Seth Forman the claims that the Black Hebrew Israelites were denied citizenship because they were black seem baseless, particularly in light of Israel’s airlift of thousands of black Ethiopian Jews in the early 1990s.[238] In April 2012, the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet reported[239] that tens of thousands of refugees and African migrant workers who have come to Israel in dangerous smuggling routes, live in southern Tel Aviv’s Levinsky Park. SvD reported that some Africans in the park sleep on cardboard boxes under the stars, others crowd in dark hovels. Also was noted a situation with African refugees, such as Sudanese from Darfur, Eritreans, Ethiopians and other African nationalities, who stand in queue to the soup kitchen, organized by Israeli volunteers. The interior minister reportedly “wants everyone to be deported”. In May 2012, disgruntlement toward Africans and calls for deportation and “blacks out” in Tel Aviv boiled over into death threats, fire bombings, rioting, and property destruction. Protesters blamed immigrants for worsening crime and the local economy, some of protesters were seen throwing eggs at African immigrants[240][241] In what became known as the October 2000 events, Arab-Israelis rioted while protesting Israeli actions in the early stages of the Second Intifada, attacking Jewish civilians and Israeli police with live gunfire, molotov cocktails, stones, and vandalism of Jewish property. One Egged bus was torched on the first day. Arab rioting took place in Umm al-Fahm, Baqa al-Gharbiyye, Sakhnin, Nazareth, Lod, Kafar Kanna, Mashhad, Arraba, Ramla, Or Akiva and Nazareth Illit. A Jewish citizen was killed when his car was stoned, and a synagogue was torched. Hundreds of Arab residents of Jaffa burned tires, threw rocks, and beat reporters.[242] Throughout the course of the riots, Israeli Police repeatedly opened fire at Arab riots and demonstrations, killing 13 people, including 12 Arab-Israelis and one Palestinian from Gaza. Thousands of Jews counter-rioted against Arabs in Nazareth, Bat Yam, Petah Tikva, Tiberias, Tel Aviv, Acre, Nazareth Illit, Lod, Rosh HaAyin, Or Akiva and Jerusalem, throwing stones at and beating Arabs, vandalizing and torching Arab homes and property, attacking Arab traffic, and chanting “Death to the Arabs!”.[243] An Arab worker was stabbed on his way to work in Rosh HaAyin. In Jaffa, a mosque was vandalized, and another was torched in Tiberias. In Tel Aviv, Arab restaurant workers were chased from a restaurant, and their cars set alight. Sam Lehman-Wilzig, Political Communications Professor at Bar-Ilan University, said that rioting is rare and alien to Jewish political society. “The numbers (of riots) are so low because of our Jewish political culture which encourages protesting, but seriously discourages violent protest,” he said. He argues that the riots were caused since Israelis felt threatened by the “pressure cooker syndrome” of fighting not just the Palestinians and Lebanon’s Hezbollah guerrillas, but also the Israeli Arab population.[244] In 2008, a series of riots broke out in Acre, after an Arab motorist and his teenage son drove into a predominantly Jewish neighborhood during Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish religion, to visit relatives. According to police, their car’s windows were down and music was blaring. Police spokesperson Eran Shaked said that “this was a provocation… we believe he was intoxicated. This was a deliberate act”.[245] Their vehicle was pelted with stones, and they sought refuge in a relative’s home. A Jewish mob chased them, then gathered around the building chanting “Death to the Arabs!”, and attacked police who tried to intervene.[246] An incorrect rumor spread among the Arab residents that the driver had been killed, prompting calls from local mosques to avenge his death.[247] Arabs rioted in the city center, smashing shop windows, vandalizing vehicles, and throwing rocks at people going to or from Yom Kippur prayers,[248][249] chanting Death to the Jews” and “If you come out of your homes, you will die”. Israeli Police forcibly dispersed the rioters with tear gas and stun grenades. As soon as the Yom Kippur fast ended, about 200 Jewish residents rioted in Acre’s Arab neighborhoods, torching homes, vandalizing property, and forcing dozens of families to flee. Riots and retaliations by both sides continued for four days.[247]Haaretz editorialized that that year’s “Yom Kippur will be infamous for the violent, racist outburst by Jews against Arabs within Israel”. During the course of monitoring elections in 2009, a Member of the Knesset (MK) replaced another Jewish election monitor at the Israeli-Arab town of Umm al-Fahm, who was prevented by police from entering the city because of threats by local Arabs on his life. As soon as the MK began to perform his duties, an Israeli-Arab mob rioted outside attacking the guards and shouts of Death to the Jews could be heard. Israeli Police arrested five rioters.[250] Israel has a law that prohibits incitement to racism.[5] According to the State Department, Israel’s anti-discrimination law “prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, marital status, or sexual orientation. The law also prohibits discrimination by both government and nongovernment entities on the basis of race, religion, political beliefs, and age.” Israel is a signatory of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination treaty since 1966, and has ratified the treaty in 1979.[251] The treaty forbids any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. The Anti Defamation League states: “There is no Israeli ideology, policy or plan to segregate, persecute or mistreat its Israeli Arab citizens, nor Palestinian Arabs,” it goes on in saying that Israel is a democracy which encourages vibrant debate, which has a flourishing free press and which shares with other liberal democracies a core value: the equality of all its citizens before the law.[252] The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs states that “Arab Israelis are citizens of Israel with equal rights” and states that “The only legal distinction between Arab and Jewish citizens is not one of rights, but rather of civic duty. Since Israel’s establishment, Arab citizens have been exempted from compulsory service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).”[253]

Fair Usage Law

June 28, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Leading Jewish Paper Admits: American … – David Duke.com

The Jewish Daily Forward, one of Americans leading leftist Zionist publications, has openly admitted that American Jews turn a blind eye to Jewish racism while continually accusing everybody else of being racist. In what is a rare example of Jewish Supremacist honesty, the Jewish Daily Forward said in an article titled Israels Everyday Racism and How American Jews Turn a Blind Eye to It, that Jews were outraged when Jesse Jackson referred to New York as Hymietown. Wheres the anger over Israeli public figures rampant racism? The Jewish Daily Forward continued: The Anti-Defamation League and the rest of the American Jewish establishment owe Jesse Jackson a big apology. They put the man through the wringer, they made him apologize in every possible forum for his Hymie and Hymietown remarks back in 1984. Yet look at the kinds of things Israeli leaders senior government ministers, chief rabbis get away with without ever having to apologize, without ever being punished in the slightest. The paper goes on to list a number of incidents, including Israeli government officials saying that Arabs need to be murdered to the Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel, David Lau, saying that Jews should not watch Basketball on television.What difference does it make, Lau said, if the kushim who get paid in Tel Aviv beat the kushim who get paid in Greece? Kushim, especially when used in a dismissive context like Lau did, is a well-understood derogatory term for blacks, equivalent to the N-word. The paper goes on to list a number of other examples of racism in Israel which have been ignored by American Jewry (and the Jewish Supremacist controlled media in America): Likud lawmaker Miri Regev is doing fine after having called Sudanese refugees a cancer on our body to a crowd of hopped-up south Tel Avivians in May of last year, shortly before the crowd went on a window-smashing mini-pogrom against the Africans in the neighborhood. Legendary basketball coach Pini Gershons career and public stature didnt suffer at all after he explained his racial theory about blacks to a class of amused army officers in 2000. The mocha-colored guys are smarter, but the dark colored ones are just guys off the street, Gershon said. Theyre dumb like slaves, they do whatever you tell them. Nor was there any blowback whatsoever after Bibi Netanyahu bragged in 2007 that the cuts hed made to child subsidies had brought a positive result, which he identified as the demographic effect on the non-Jewish public, where there was a dramatic drop in the birth rate. Imagine the scandal if an American political leader boasted publicly that his cuts to child subsidies had reduced the non-Christian birth rate. Imagine the ADLs reaction. But in Israel, in 2007, from the mouth of a once-and-future prime minister nothing. Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to boast about how they manage to reduce non-European birth-rates? Although the article is revealing, and, as said, unusually honest, it is also an exercise in misdirection. It focusses on comments by individuals and thereby tries to make out that these are just one-off unfortunate remarks which anybody could make. The reality of the Zionist state is of course completely differentits racism is not limited to individual derogatory comments here and there, but instead is founded on an institutionalized and legally enforced Jewish Supremacist racist ideology. The Jewish Daily Forward article deliberately ignored these examples in its review: In the Jews-only state, immigration is strictly controlled, and the Zionists use DNA tests on potential immigrants to ensure that their state remains racially pure. Of course, in America and other nations, these same Jewish Supremacists are at the forefront of demanding open borders for everyone else. In Israel, theJewish state funds organizations, private and public, which work full time to prevent Jews from mixing with non-Jews. The same Jewish organizations which promote racial intermarriage for every other nation, support Israel where a Jew cannot legally marry a non-Jew. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of promoting the mixing of Gentiles of all ethnicities. In America, and other Western nations,Jewish Supremacists have been behind the legalization of same-sex marriages; but they devotedly support Israel where same sex marriage is illegal. In Israel, asylum seeking is virtually impossible. In 2011, for example, the Jewish state granted exactly one (1) asylum seeker refuge in Israel. In America and other nations, Jewish groups are at the forefront of demanding that asylum seekers be given refuge, even if they have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach their intended destinations. -In Israel, it is that states formally declared policy to be a Jewish state and nothing else. In any other nation around the world, any attempt by the indigenous people to preserve their identity isvehemently opposed by the organized Jewish lobby. In Israel, the Jewish state builds entire settlements on land it stole from the Palestinians, where Palestinians are forbidden to live. Israel has thousands of segregated schools. institutions, apartment buildings and neighborhoods, reserved for Jews only. In Americaor any other nation on earthJewish Supremacist groups such as the ADL or SPLC are at the forefront of legal actions against any local authority or public organization which is segregated on any basis whatsoeverand especially any organization which might want to exclude Jews. These are just some of the very real examples of Jewish racism which the Daily Jewish Forward could have listedbut that level of honesty would probably be asking too much. Nonetheless, the point is still valid: In Israel, Jewish Supremacy is rampantly racist, while in America and elsewhere, the Israel-supporting Jewish lobbies pose as anti-racists. Jewish Racism Strongest When Directed against Europeans There are two other truths which the Jewish Daily Forward article has covered up: 1. That Jewish Supremacist racism, although applied against all Gentiles, is most vituperative and strongest in its hatred when directed against Europeans and European-Americans in particular; and 2. That this vicious anti-European racism is not limited to Israel, but is prevalent among Jewish Supremacists living in America as well. For example, Dr. Richard Steinlight, a former Director of National Affairs (domestic policy) at the American Jewish Committee, wrote in an article titled The Jewish Stake in Americas Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy published by the Center for Immigration Studies in 2001, stated it very clearly: Ill confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative years . . . I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language and was taught the superiority of my people to the Gentiles who oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as people less sensitive, intelligent and moral than ourselves. Rabbi Yhitzhak Ginsburgh: Gentiles are not human. American born Rabbi Yitzchak Ginzburg and his teachings are discussed in a by Motti Inbari called Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple? (State University of New York Press, April 23, 2009) as follows: In his writings, Ginzburg gives prominence to Halachic and kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect. He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in Gods image, the Gentiles do not have this status, and are effectively considered subhuman. Accordingly, for example, the commandment Thou shall not murder does not apply to the killing of a Gentile, since You shall not murder relates to the murder of a human, while for him the Gentiles do not constitute humans. Similarly, Ginzburg stated that, on the theoretical level, if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully. (Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who Will Build the Third Temple? Page 134.) Racist Rabbi Ovadia Yosef with his good friend, Benjamin Netanyahu. Recently deceasedracist Rabbi OvadiaYosef, head of the Sephardic Jewish community in Israel, was famous for his open hatred of Gentiles. For example, he is on record in the Jewish Telegraphic Agencyas saying that Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel, he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat, he said to some laughter. Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European Gentile leader had to make such remarks? Jewish organizations in America and elsewhere spend billions of dollars on anti-assimilation policies designed to prevent Jews from marrying non-Jews. Could the reader imagine what the reaction would be among Jewish Supremacists if any European advocacy group had to spend millions on programs to prevent Europeans marrying Jews? Most importantly of all, the reason why Jewish Supremacists have been able to take over so many institutions created by Europeans (such as Hollywood, the media, educational institutions and so on) is precisely because of their racist clique which actively discriminates against Europeans in favor of themselves. All of these factors are deliberately ignored by the Jewish Daily Forward, which instead focusses on individual acts of ant-African racism to be found in Israel. After all, anything is better than admitting to their real focus of their racism: a ongoing and driven hatred of Europeans and European-Americans in particular.

Fair Usage Law

June 16, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Why is it? The Only Racism You Can’t Criticize is Jewish …

In America The Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations is composed of the 50 largest Jewish organizations. It includes some the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the ADL and many more with global reach. With over a billion dollars of wealth they are dedicated to Israel and Jewish interests nationally and globally. They support clear domestic policies in Western nations. They all support Israel, But the policies they support for every other nation are the very opposite of that of Israel. 1) They support Israel which bans same sex marriage in defense of the Jewish family. BUT SUPPORT SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN EVERY OTHER NATION. 2) They support Israel where it is illegal for a Jew to marry a non-Jew. Most of the largest Jewish organizations in Western nations have programs to prevent intermarriage of Jews and non-Jews. BUT THEY WOULD DEMONIZE AS NAZI ANY NATION, ORGANIZATION OR PERSON THAT WOULD CONDEMN GENTILE INTERMARRIAGE WITH JEWS. 3) They support Israel which has the strictest immigration policies in the world, based on Jewish DNA and accept almost no refugees. BUT IN EVERY NATION OTHER THAN ISRAEL THEY SUPPORT OPEN IMMIGRATION AND MASSIVE NUMBERS OF REFUGEES. 4) They support Israel which is overwhelmingly segregated in schools, apartments, neighborhoods, whole cities and towns and even in the settlements they stole from Palestinians. Israel even segregates public transport and has Jews only roads in the occupied territories. BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION THEY CONDEMN SEGREGATION. 5) They support Israel where Israel citizens can publicly carry around machine guns if they wish. BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION SUPPORT STRICT GUN CONTROL. 6) They Support Israel which honors Jews who spout hate and even genocide against Gentiles (such as the late Rabbi Yosef). BUT IN EVERY OTHER NATION, THEY WOULD CONDEMN ANY PROMINENT GENTILE THAT WOULD SAY THINGS EVEN REMOTELY SIMILAR. 7) They support Israel where massive casino gambling such as in Las Vegas is not permitted. BUT THEY SUPPORT IT IN AMERICA WHERE JEWISH SUPREMACIST, RADICAL ZIONISTS SUCH AS SHELDON ADELSON MAKE FORTUNES FROM CASINOS AND THEN USE THE MONEY FROM THE VICE TO BE AMERICAS BIGGEST CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTOR. 8) They support Israel which a Jewish State that celebrates and honors its Jewish religion and culture. IN AMERICA AND ELSEWHERE, JEWISH SUPREMACIST GROUPS ARE AT THE FOREFRONT OF LEGAL ACTION TO REMOVE ALL CHRISTIAN SYMBOLS OR REFERENCES FROM PUBLIC PLACES. IN THE HEIGHT OF CHUTZPAH AT THE SAME TIME, THEY DEMAND THE RIGHT TO ERECT JEWISH SYMBOLS AT ALL PUBLIC PLACES SUCH AS IN FRONT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. 9) They support Israel which is the very opposite of diversity. In fact they demand that Israel be a Jewish State openly dedicated to the Jewish People. There are no powerful media owned by non-Jews in Israel. There are no Gentiles in control the Israeli National Banking system. Jewish organizations around the world support Israel where its 20 percent Palestinian population is only 11 percent of University students. BUT IN AMERICA AND EUROPE EVERY JEWISH ORGANIZATION SUPPORTS THE COMPLETE LACK OF DIVERSITY IN ISRAEL AND AT THE SAME TIME A PHONY DIVERSITY IN AMERICA AND EUROPE IN WHICH JEWS, 2 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION CONTROL MEDIA, FINANCE AND GOVERNMENT. Jews, who are only 2 percent of the population comprise 25 percent of the top universities, while European Americans, who are 70 percent of the population are only 20 percent. This domination at Harvard and the Ivy League is not because 2 percent of the Students comprise 25 percent of the best students. In fact, Jews are 14 times (1,400 percent) over represented than they should be by qualification and merit). They totally control the major Hollywood movie and TV studios and most of the worlds media conglomerates due to Jewish tribalist racism. They also dominate International banking such as the worlds leading predator criminal bank Goldman Sachs as well as the Federal Reserve Bank, the World Bank and the IMF. They dont dominate Hollywood because the 98 percent of the non-Jewish population is not capable. They dominate for one overwhelming reason, because of their racist tribalism. The real privilege in America is Jewish privilege. The real most powerful and virulent racism in America is Jewish racism. Why is Jewish racism the only racism you cant criticize? Answer: because Jewish racists control the means by which criticism is heard: the media. With their media, financial and political control, they tyrannically prevent any discussion of the truth about racist Israel and the most powerful tribal racism on Earth; Jewish Supremacism.

Fair Usage Law

June 12, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed

Kill All Pedophiles by John de Nugent

Please contact YouTube and get this video deleted, before someone uses www.ClipConverter.cc to download this video and upload it to all the video sharing web sites on the Internet.

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2016   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Hate Speech, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

Leo Frank is Interrogated by Atlanta Police On Monday morning, April 28, 1913 in the presence of his powerful lawyers Luther Zeigler Rosser and Herbert Haas.

The Monday morning, April 28, 1913 interrogation of Leo Frank at Atlanta’s Stationhouse that became State’s Exhibit B at his trial (question and answer portion published in Atlanta Constitution, August 2nd, 1913). Both the Leo Frank defense and Leo Frank prosecution ratified it as being accurate. Pay special attention to the time Leo Frank says […]

Fair Usage Law

April 28, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, Ashkenazi, B'nai B'rith, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Extremism, Jewish Heritage, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Racism, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC  Comments Closed

White Jewish Racism – LA Progressive – Progressive Media …

The L.A. Progressive is a misnomer and a lie. You have outdone yourselves this time with your blatant antiSemitism and your frequently published Anti- Jewish garbage. Were another periodical publishing rants from the Ku Klux Klan regularly, you would quickly and rightfully, blast them for their lies and their bigoted crazyness. But if someone trumpets racist junk and outright fabrications against Jews, you run with it without researching in a search for truth. I doubt that you will allow this in your blog as you have censored me before when I denounce your bigotry with facts. Have you no shame? The fact that Hutchinson has a Ph.D and was appointed to be a senior intergroup specialist or whatever that means, to the Human Relations Commission, does not give her any credibility. Throughout history there are countless Ph.Ds who have participated in slavery, and prejudice of the worst kind. At this moment in time, we have Tea Partyers with earned doctorates,mostly as OBGYNs, who also take idiotic positions on any number of things Including backing up someting one Rep. calls legitamate rape. It is an unexplainable anamoly that one side of the brain can comprehend enough to get an education but cant reason clearly, and is bound by jingoism and prejudices. Adam Silver- a Jew, took the harshest stance against bigoted Sterling- also a Jew, and answered the question about his Jewishness with, I am a human being as he slapped Sterling appropriately with the harshest sanctions ever handed down, including the ban for life. The people who have stood with constancy against prejudice and injustice to blacks, and in numbers like more than 90% have been the Jews, They have not trumpeted their allegiance to black people with words, but by their actions, marching, riding the freedom buses, knowing full well that they would be beaten, harassed, tortured, jailed and sometimes murdered as the two black Jewish kids were who went to Mississippi to register Black voters. Yes, the Klan murdered Goodman, Shwermer and Chaney. They could have stayed in Brooklyn where they would have been safe. They were not the first or the last sticking up for African Americans. The Jews have contributed money, time and energy, and voting and serving, to liberal causes and to civil rights for all The discussion of when Jews became white is so ludicrous that most people dont wish to participate in the foolishness of it. Color of skin, eyes, hair, is immaterial as it is a genetic thing that can and has been changed in a very few generations. The Genes take care of that. European Jews in the North are usually light skinned, while Jews from China and Japan take on the hues of those countries. African Jews are dark. Israel rescued African Jews from Ethiopia and Sudan, by airlifting more than 20,000 of them out of Africa. When nobody would step in to save the Africans. Israel gave them free educations, especially in computer programing, after teaching them Hebrew so that they could conduct themselves while going to school or business, in the language of the country. Israel gave them free medical care and free housing. I know this because I met with the head of the Falashas, which is a pajoritive term given them by the Ethiopians. We have many black Jews, and all are equal citizens with everyone else in Israel a dynamic democracy. Israel has no record of keeping slaves, and no history of prejudice against Blacks. Color of skin and eyes or hair is considered unimportant to Jews. All that counts is if you are an ethical, loving compassionate, human being who cares about justice for all. Jews above all are bent on doing social justice. That is what we are taught and that is what our beloved fellow Jew and the greatest teacher of our religion, taught as long ago as when he gave the sermon on the Mount. Yes, I am speaking of our family member, Yesua in Hebrew, who you call Jesus I think that is a greek name. Jesus taught of morals and ethics, concepts which had been unknown in the world before, a world that believed in myths and Gods, where concern for ones fellow human beings were strange and unknown. The Christian followers were Jewish and 35 of them fed to lions. Yesua would be ashamed of prejudice on the basis of Color, creed, religion, or what family you were born into without having been given a choice in the matter. Wherever the Prejudice eminates from, including from Jews, Blacks or Latinos would make him ashamed. The Jews will always actively work for justice for the oppressed and the underdog, no matter how badly they are denigrated. Have you any idea of where the term Ghetto came from? The word is Italian and it came from the fact that Jews were not allowed to live in the midst of cities with the rest of the populace. They were actually walled in cities within the city. If any of the jews were needed to work within the City, they had to have a special pass, to enter. In Eastern Europe these walled off Ghettos or the villages called Shtetles, were regularly attacked by ruffians and by Cossacks. Often the girls were raped. Maybe that is how the skin color became lighter in North Eastern Europe. In Spain Jews were put on the rack during the inquisition and many escaped to Africa- To Morocco and Algeria. In recent years, after living in these places for hundreds of years they have been kicked out. Israel took them in and sometimes their skin is darker. Who the hell cares what skin color they have. All that matters is if they are good people. Jews were even blamed for the Bubonic Plague in the Middle ages, which made them flee Northward. The ravings of Ms. Hutchinson should be considered much like Donald Sterlings ravings and bigoted rantings. She should be kicked off of the Human Relations Board for Life, or as senior whatever. Without any proof of any kind she portrays Jews as having gotten ahead financially because of the injustices in this country suffered by African Americana. Totally untrue! EDUCATION, was the way out of the morass and hatred of Jews. As a child I used to see signs outside of hotels and restaurants that said No Jews, no dogs allowed, it was commonplace. To this day Jews cannot get on the Boards of the big Corporations, such as oil companies, insurance, and automobile industries. They have had to be inventive.

Fair Usage Law

March 19, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Racism  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."