Archive for the ‘Jewish Supremacism’ Category

The Murder of Mary Phagan and Aborted Apotheosis of Leo Frank, part 1

Published by admin, on April 26th, 2014

Mary Phagan

American Dissident Voices broadcast of April 26, 2014

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LEO FRANK was a Jewish sex killer who was president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith — and who was re-elected to that post even after his conviction. Frank was tried and found guilty of the strangulation of a 13-year-old White girl who worked for him, Mary Phagan (pictured, artist’s depiction), who died exactly 101 years ago today.

In one of the first visible nationwide efforts of the Jewish power structure in this country, immediately after Frank’s conviction a frantic, expensive, dishonest, underhanded, and wildly over-the-top campaign was launched to clear his name and accuse others — a campaign which continues even to this day. In that campaign, the White people and institutions of the American South were falsely accused of an “anti-Semitism” that never existed, an accusation which triggered real anti-Jewish feelings there on a scale never seen before in history. As a direct result of that huge blunder, the B’nai B’rith founded in 1913 the central organ of Jewish propaganda and corrupt influence in this country, the Anti-Defamation League, or ADL.

What really happened to Mary Phagan on that fateful day? The best evidence — the evidence affirmed by the Atlanta coroner’s jury, grand jury which included several Jews, the trial jury, the Supreme Court of Georgia, and the Supreme Court of the United States — tells us this:

Thirteen-year-old child laborer Mary Phagan came to her place of work, Atlanta’s National Pencil Company, to pick up her pay from the company’s part-owner and supervisor Leo Frank,  around noon on Saturday, April 26, 1913. It was a holiday (Confederate Memorial Day), but she had to come in to get her pay because Frank had refused the day before to let one of Mary’s friends pick it up for her, as had been done in the past. Frank evidently wanted Mary herself to come to get her pitiful $1.20, alone, and on a Saturday holiday, too — when the offices would be deserted. Frank had a reputation for lasciviousness among quite a few of the employees of the firm, many of whom were teenage girls. He had more than once arranged for the factory’s Black sweeper, Jim Conley, to act as his lookout while he “chatted” for an hour or so all alone with one of the girls.

Mary came into the factory building, walked up the stairs to the second floor where Leo Frank’s office was, passing Jim Conley sitting quietly on the first floor on her way up. Conley had been seen by several people that day, apparently doing nothing but sitting there — a rather strange thing for a beer- and dice-loving social sort of man as Jim Conley to be doing on a holiday when he had no official duties at the place. Except for some workmen on the fourth floor far above, there was no one else in the building, and no one at all except Leo Frank on the second floor.

Leo Frank

Leo Frank

Mary met Frank in his office and asked for her pay. She also asked Frank if the supply of metal had come in, since, if it hadn’t, she wouldn’t work on Monday. Frank said “I don’t know,” and asked Mary to accompany him to the metal room, further back on the same floor, to see. Back they went, the lustful monster with evil intent, and the innocent girl, dressed up brightly for the holiday, taking the last steps of her life.

Once they were in the metal room, Frank made his planned indecent approach to Mary. We know that Frank moved in on her physically, because we also know that she resisted and was flung down by an apparently enraged Frank, striking the back of her head on a lathe handle and rendering her unconscious or at least helpless. Below, Conley heard the footsteps and a scream but did nothing — evidently screams weren’t uncommon during Frank’s ‘chats” with other girls. Nothing to worry about.

While Mary Phagan was unconscious or nearly so from the head wound he had inflicted on her, Leo Frank made an attempt to rape her: Her vagina had violence done to it, according to the physician who examined her dead body. Realizing soon after his lust had subsided that Mary, when she fully regained consciousness, would likely testify against him, ruining him for life and possibly sending him to prison, Leo Max Frank made a conscious decision to kill her. He obtained some strong cord from the supplies nearby, fastened it around her neck, and strangled her to death on the floor of the metal room, the cord deeply biting into her neck. He then ripped off a strip of her lacy underwear and fastened it so as to temporarily conceal her neck wound.

Just a few moments later, at around 12:05, Conley watched one of the factory’s other working girls, Monteen Stover, walk up the same set of stairs. Like Mary, she also was looking to collect her pay from Frank. Monteen entered Leo Frank’s office. But there was no one there. Monteen looked carefully in Frank’s outer office, then his inner office — both were empty. She looked down the hall and saw no sign of life. She decided to wait, and stayed in Frank’s office a full five minutes, until 12:10 according to the office clock. She gave up and left, and Conley saw her leave. Monteen Stover’s fruitless visit to Leo Frank’s empty office would be very significant in this case — because Leo Frank would later tell the police that he had been in his office continuously from noon to 12:35.

Some time after Monteen Stover left the building, Leo Frank, having completed his unspeakable acts of rape and murder, came looking for loyal Conley to help him dispose of the body and pin the crime on another Black man.

Frank told Conley that “I wanted to be with the little girl, and she refused me, and I struck her and I guess I struck her too hard and she fell and hit her head against something, and I don’t know how she got hurt.” Remember the piece of lacy underwear around her throat: unlikely to fool an investigator for even a minute, but possibly enough to keep Conley from knowing Mary’s real cause of death while he disposed of the body. Frank didn’t tell Conley that Mary was dead, but Conley quickly told him. Conley and Frank carried Mary’s body to the basement, near the maw of the factory furnace.

Frank gave Conley money, and promised him another $200 if he would return later and burn the body. Conley promised to do so — a promise he failed to keep. Frank did induce Conley to write several notes that were left near the body. These notes were ostensibly from Mary, and blamed the crime on a “tall, slim Negro” (Conley was short and chunky). The notes also described Mary’s attacker as “the night witch.” The description matched Newt Lee, the company’s night watchman, who was due to come on duty later that afternoon and work all night.

Conley never returned that day. Mary’s body still lay in the basement when Frank returned from lunch. Frank was unable to move her body by himself. When Newt Lee arrived at four — earlier than usual because Frank had told him he was going to a baseball game — Frank appeared extremely nervous and sent him away for a full two hours. When Lee said he’d prefer to sleep at the factory for those two hours, Frank absolutely insisted that he leave and come back at six.

At six, Frank had no possible excuse to send Lee away again. So when Conley utterly failed to return to perform the grisly task he had promised to do, Frank had no choice but to let Lee go on duty. Prior to Lee’s second arrival, Leo Frank had turned down the gas light in the basement as far as it would go without turning it completely off, doubtless hoping to delay the discovery of the body for as long as possible.  Frank was extremely nervous and jumpy on Lee’s return. He couldn’t even operate the time clock properly. An hour or so after he left for home, Frank called Lee on the telephone to “check and see if everything was all right” — something he had never done before.

The discovery of the body was long delayed. Newt Lee didn’t notice it until around three o’clock in the morning. When Frank was brought to the factory the next morning by police, he was so nervous he couldn’t even properly use his customary lock and key without fumbling. He told police that he’d been in his office from noon to 12:35, totally unaware that Monteen Stover would soon prove that to be a lie. He told police that he didn’t know Mary Phagan by name, despite interacting with her daily and filling our her pay stubs weekly for an entire year. And then Frank proceeded to tell police that he knew that a former company bookkeeper, James Gantt, was intimate with this the girl he didn’t know at all, Mary Phagan. (Gantt was actually arrested based on Frank’s insinuation, but was quickly cleared of any involvement in the crime.)

Frank looked at Newt Lee’s time card and declared that Lee had made all his rounds on time. But a few days later Frank produced a time card showing that Lee had missed several rounds, long enough for him to have returned home, changed out of his bloody clothing, and returned to the factory. And not too long after that, a bloody shirt was found in a barrel near Newt Lee’s residence — a shirt that was later proved to have been purposely smeared with blood and planted there by parties unknown. When the attempt to implicate Newt Lee failed, in large part because of proof that Mary Phagan died right around noon, Frank and his defenders would finally switch their accusations to another Black man, Jim Conley. According to researcher Bradford Huie:

“To implicate Conley, a corrupt Pinkerton agent named W.D. McWorth — three weeks after the entire factory had been meticulously examined by police and Pinkerton men — miraculously ‘discovered’ a bloody club, a piece of cord like that used to strangle Mary Phagan, and an alleged piece of Mary Phagan’s pay envelope on the first floor of the factory, near where the factory’s Black sweeper, Jim Conley, had been sitting on the fatal day. This was the beginning of the attempt to place guilt for the killing on Conley, an effort which still continues 100 years later. The ‘discovery’ was so obviously and patently false that it was greeted with disbelief by almost everyone, and McWorth was pulled off the investigation and eventually discharged by the Pinkerton agency.”

* * *

The Jewish media put forward two basic arguments for Frank’s innocence: 1) Leo Frank, they say, was tried and convicted for the murder of Mary Phagan mainly because he was a Jew — they say that “anti-Semitism” was rampant in the South, and an anti-Jewish mob intimidated the jury; and 2) They claim that the 1982 affidavit of Alonzo Mann, Frank’s office boy — who said that he saw James Conley carrying the body of Mary Phagan on that terrible day — proves that Conley, and not Frank, was the killer.

On my next American Dissident Voices program, I’ll show you that both of these arguments are utterly incredible. I’ll demonstrate that anti-Semitism was almost unknown in the South of 1913, and I’ll use Jewish sources and sources friendly to Frank — even one of the partners in the law firm that defended him — to prove it. I’ll also prove that Alonzo Mann’s dubious affidavit, even if true, changes absolutely nothing about the case.

* * *

I’ve given a lot of attention to the Leo Frank case over the last year here on National Vanguard and I’ve helped some other researchers and scholars who were digging into this amazing case — and I ended up being accused (with the usual wildly exaggerated mix of fact and fiction) by the Jewish Daily Forward and the ADL itself of being some kind of mastermind behind “at least four” of the Leo Frank-oriented sites that have sprung up in recent years. Well, it’s nice to get credit for my part in a noble task well done, but the effort to publish the hidden facts about this case has been largely spontaneous — a huge group effort involving dozens of researchers, scholars, writers, and publishers, men and women inspired to risk defamation and destitution because they hate lies and love the truth.

And this effort is succeeding: The major search engines now return many results from sites telling the righteous truth about the Frank case, from Metapedia’s articles to the huge Leo Frank Case and Trial Research Library, to the encyclopedic series on the case by Bradford L. Huie in The American Mercury, and many, many others, including pieces we’ve published on National Vanguard. The really heartening thing is that these independent media are often standing as high or higher than the Jewish groups’ own sites in terms of search rank, and therefore relevance and readership.

Just three of the increasingly popular sites which tell the truth about the Frank case.

Just three of the increasingly popular Web sites which tell the truth about the Frank case

I’ve given so much attention to this case because it’s important. It’s important to understand just how weak and insupportable the Jewish propaganda is about this case. It’s important for the memory of Mary Phagan and the peace of mind of her family to know that her real killer was justly convicted. It’s important to understand how the world’s wealthiest ethnic group tried to make Southern Whites feel guilty about an “anti-Semitism” that never existed. It’s important to understand how this same power structure has gone on to inculcate guilt in all White men and women for their supposed part in slavery and “racism” — with “evidence” just as thin, just as preposterous. And it’s very, very important to understand that with some dedication and courage and work, we can defeat these media liars in their own arena and change the minds of millions of people.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the reconstituted National Alliance membership organization, founded by William Luther Pierce in 1970. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. We welcome your support, your inquiries, and your help in spreading our message of hope to our people. Once again, that address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: “Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.”

Listen to the broadcast

Leo Frank case resources for further study:

The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913 The first neutral book written on the subject.

The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (Available on http://www.Archive.org) Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events surrounding the trial of Leo Frank.

American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson Tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team, this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some important things said and details when it republishes parts of the trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the 1913 Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence.

Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank Some but not all of the nine hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this book. This is an excellent book and required reading.

Atlanta Georgian newspaper covering the Leo Frank Case from April though August, 1913. http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

Atlanta Journal Newspaper, April, 28, 1913, through till the end of August, 1913, pertaining to the Leo Frank Case: http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank, By Tom W. Brown, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982.

Leo Frank Trial and Appeals Georgia Supreme Court File (1,800 pages).

http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Tom Watson on the Leo Frank Case, The American Mercury, 2014

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism  Comments Closed

Jewish Supremacism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening on the Jewish Question is a 2003 book by former Klansman and white supremacist David Duke.[1] In it, Duke weaves together different Antisemitic canards to present a conspiracy theory alleging a Jewish plot to take over the world.[2][3] In 2007, an “updated and expanded” version was released. Duke has pushed the book’s translation and publication in a number of languages.[4]

Jewish Supremacism elaborates on his previous book, My Awakening, in which he claims that the different races of humanity can only fight, and that non-white races must ultimately lose. Duke presents Jews as predatory oppressors in his attempt to defend antisemitism. Jewish Supremacism takes this theme further, arguing that Jews collectively believe they are a superior race. Duke reinterprets history to fit his argument. For example, he claims that:

Duke attempts to establish motive by misquoting out-of-context passages from ancient Jewish writings, claiming that they prove that the majority of modern Jews believe they should rule the world.[2][4]

Duke promoted the book on his site by comparing it to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,[6] Duke also toured Spain,[7] Sweden, Hungary,[8] and Russia to promote the book. Duke’s visit to Russia prompted the Anti-Defamation League to urge a criminal case against the book’s author and publisher under Russia’s anti-hate crime laws.[9]

The rest is here:

Jewish Supremacism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair Usage Law

March 5, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jewish Racism: Ron Paul’s Ties to Jewish Supremacism and …

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Jewish racism protecting all jews business

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

Ron Paul is closely tied to the late Ludwig von Mises through his ideas and the institute which bears his name. Ludwig von Mises was in turn closely tied to the Jewish supremacist and organizer of World Government, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi promoted the idea of a European Union and a pan-American Union. Rothschild and Warburg sponsored him. Coudenhove-Kalergi also stated that the Jews are a superior race which should lead the World, but that all the other races should be mixed, which according to him would result in the manifestation of the worst traits and the disappearance of the best traits in the Gentile races. Zionist British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli had made similar claims.

Coudenhove-Kalergi wanted the different “races” to mix in intermarriage so that the children of these unions would be inferior to their parents and would lose any sense of cultural and ethnic heritage. He wanted to then substitute a new culture of obedience and servitude among this new degenerated “race”, subservience to a ruling Jewish elite. He would have the Jews remain nobly segregated and preserve them as rulers over all others. It is a fact that many of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s policies have been instituted. Ron Paul is fronting for these von Misian forces.

Eustace Mullins wrote of Ludwig von Mises and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi,

Melchior Palyi, in ‘The Twilight of Gold’, reveals the power plays of the World Order in international finance, when he quotes from the Diary of Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France. Palyi says, ‘In October, 1926, Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France sent his closest collaborator to London to explore the intentions of Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England. Pierre Quesnay, then general manager of the Bank of France 1926-30, and Bank for International Settlements 1930-37, brought back a report which was recorded by Moreau : ‘Quesnay also gives me interesting views about the ambitions of Montagu Norman and the group of financiers who surround him: Sir Otto Niemeyer, Sir Arthur Salter, Sir Henry Strakosch, Sir Robert Kindersley they are striving to make London the great international financial centre. But those close to Norman state this is not his objective … he wants more than anything else to witness the setting up of links between the various banks of issue … The economic and financial organization of the world appears to the Governor of the Bank of England to be the major task of the Twentieth Century. In his view politicians and political institutions are in no fit state to direct with the necessary competence and continuity this task of organization which he would like to see undertaken by central banks, independent at once of governments and of private finance. Hence his campaign in favour of completely autonomous central banks, dominating their own financial markets and deriving their power from common agreement among themselves. They would succeed in taking out of the political realm those problems which are essential for the development and prosperity of the national financial security, distribution of credit, movement of prices. They would thus prevent internal political struggles from harming the wealth and the economic advancement of nations.’

In short, Norman wished to see the imposition of the World Order over the financial affairs of the nations. It was this agreement among the central banks, rather than the front organization, the League of Nations, which became their final instrument of power. Crucial to these arrangements was the monetarist school, the Austrian School of Economics, an outgrowth of the Pan-Europe movement. Margit Herzfeld notes in her biography of Ludwig von Mises that he participated in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi’s Pan Europe movement in 1943. He had been brought to the U.S. in 1940 by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation of $2500 a year to work at the Natl. Bureau of Economic Research, which grant was renewed in 1943. Von Mises’ pupils, Arthur Burns and Milton Friedman now expound the monetarist theory through a network of supersecret ‘conservative’ think tanks led by the Mont Pelerin Society. Herzfeld says that von Mises’ most famous protege was the Soviet apologist Murray Rothbard.”Eustace Mullins, “The Rule of the Order”, The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, Chapter Eight.

Paul wants to create private gold banks, which obviously will be international and become the centralized entirely private Jewish controlled World bank Paul’s bosses seek to institute as a mechanism of World control. This new Jewish monopoly on banking and gold will give World Jewry even greater control over money and it will be entirely detached from any country’s government. This is the ultimate privatization of money creation and money supply which International Jewry has always sought. Even the system described in Carroll Quigley’s book does not give World Jewry the power they will obtain under Ron Paul’s system, which extant system has already done so much harm to the Third World and the American dollar,

Ron Paul was heavily promoted by the Hollywood Zionist Jew Aaron Russo, who claimed a close personal friendship with the Rockefeller family and who didn’t want us to talk about “Jewish bankers”. Paul’s ties to leading Zionists and his promotion by gold merchants and prominent figures in the “911 truth movement” who shy away from the proven Zionist Jewish and Israeli connection to 911, has been documented by others.

Read more:

Jewish Racism: Ron Paul’s Ties to Jewish Supremacism and …

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jews, Race, and Nicholas Wade: How Jewish Supremacism …

By Dr. J. Williams Phd. A fascinating insight into how Jewish Supremacists attempt to guard the gates of scientific debate on race has come with the new book, A Troublesome Inheritance, by well-known science journalist, Nicholas Wade.

The book, launched on May 6 this year, sprang to prominence with an article promoting the work published in Time magazine, written by Wade, titled What Science Says About Race and Genetics.

(Wade is, by the way, a former science editor of the New York Times who retired two years ago, and there is no truth to the internet-based rumor that he was sacked after writing his latest book).

In the articlewhich is largely a summary of some of the salient points of his new bookWade admits what Dr. David Duke and many others have long maintainedthat there is indeed a biological basis to raceand that the existence of these differences should not in any way be used to denigrate any individual or make any assessment as to their moral worth.

All people, as Dr. Duke has repeatedly said, have an equal right to freedom, liberty, lifeand the right to maintain their own identity without domination or oppression by any other people.

In his article, Wade echoes Dr. Duke in this way:

A longstanding orthodoxy among social scientists holds that human races are a social construct and have no biological basis.

In the decade since the decoding of the human genome, a growing wealth of data has made clear that these two positions, never at all likely to begin with, are simply incorrect.

Read the original:

Jews, Race, and Nicholas Wade: How Jewish Supremacism …

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

4. What Zionist and Anti-Zionist Jews Have Said About …

4. What Zionist And Anti-Zionist Jews Have Said About: Jewish Supremacism

The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought of the Almighty when creating the Universe. Teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac.” (Bereshith Rabba 1,5)

God has distinguished us from the rest of mankind. Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, Rambni, Rambam, Moses Maimonides), Mishneh Torah

A Jew, by the fact that he belongs to the chosen people and is circumcised, possesses so great a dignity that no one, not even an angel, can share equality with him. In fact, he is considered almost the equal of God. Pranaitis, I.B., The Talmud Unmasked, Imperial Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1892, p. 60

We are not only different from all the nations, set apart by a historical experience that is unique and unparalleled, but we are also of a much higher and greater spiritual order. Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook Quoted in A.I. Kook, Orat, Second Edition, Jerusalem, 1950; English translation in A. herzberg, The Zionist idea, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1959, pp 419-431, at 422, 425, 427

The Jewish people constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant … although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed [sic] with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species. Rabbi Judah Halevy (famous medieval poet and philosopher) in his ‘Kuzari,Zimmer, Uriel, Torah- Judaism and the State of Israel, Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY, 5732 1972, p. 12

A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A free thinker and atheist always remains a Jew. Jewish World, London, December 14, 1922

The Jews are not a part of a vast Whole which they re-integrate in dying, but they are a Whole in themselves, defying space, time, life, and death. Can God be outside the Whole? If he exists, necessarily he confounds himself with this Whole. … Thus Divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the Race – passionnel entity, eternal flame, it is the Divine essence. It must be preserved and perpetuated, therefore the idea of pure and impure was created. Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, 1929

The creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought of the Almighty when creating the Universe. Teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac. Bereshith Rabba 1,5

a fulfillment of a number of commands of Jewish religious law…Among Goldstein’s good deeds, as enumerated, are…taking revenge on non-Jews, extermination of the non-Jews who are from the seed of Amalek…and the sanctification of the Holy Name. Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, head of the Kever Yossev Yeshiva (school of Talmud) in Nablus, in praise of the infamous machine-gunning to death of Palestinian worshippers by Baruch Goldstein

Visit link:

4. What Zionist and Anti-Zionist Jews Have Said About …

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jewish supremacism – Main Page – Metapedia

From Metapedia

Jewish supremacism is the belief, and promotion of the belief, that the Jews are superior to all others and should rightfully have control over non-Jews in all matters. The religion of Talmudic Judaism itself claims that the Jews are a race “chosen” by God ahead of the rest of humanity. Jewish supremacists believe that they are morally, intellectually, religuously and genetically superior. The purpose of this belief is to have an excuse to commit crimes such as the black slave trade, the Red Holocaust and Zionism. These crimes are used to establish social, political, historical and/or industrial dominance by Jews. The supremacist views are often “supported” by fallacious scientific research of which the outcome is predetermined so that the supremacist views are “confirmed”.

Jewish supremacism is rooted in ethnocentrism and a desire for hegemony and power, and has frequently resulted in violence against non-Jews. Different forms of Jewish supremacism have different conceptions of who is considered Jew, and not all Jewish supremacist organizations agree on who is their greatest enemy. Jewish supremacism distinguishes itself from other forms of supremacism, as Jewish supremacist groups can be found in all countries with a Jewish minority or majority population, whereas this cannot be said of other forms of supremacism: for example not all, countries with a black minority also have black supremacist groups. Unfortunately, in most countries even militant Jewish supremacist organizations are not watched closely by law enforcement officials, but instead often subsidized by the governments under influence of the Zionist lobby.

Jewish-Supremacism has taken many forms all representing various Jewish survival strategies. It can be argued that many of these strategies that have emerged have been instinctual rather than conspiratorial. Some have been subtle, and others openly genocidal.

What all share is a desire by powerful Jews to 1.) Get gentiles to fight on their behalf, 2.) Weaken gentiles, 3.) Strengthen the relative position of Jews. The end-goal is said to be setting up a world “safe for Jews”, in which other nations are too weakened to oppose them, e.g. by miscegenation.

The early Bolshevik leadership in Russia was mostly Jewish. Many communist movements worldwide were heavily Jewish, including the CPUSA. The Red Holocaust in Europe, when tens of millions of Christians were killed in the name of Communism, was an ultraviolent instance of Jewish supremacism. (See also: Ilya Ehrenburg).

Israel maintains supremacy in the Levant, and maintains an ethnostate through the use of terror. It considers non-Jews to be second-class citizens and bans intermarriage.

Although “Zionism” was originally a movement to create a Jewish state for the first time since the breakup of Khazaria, the term “Zionism” and “Zionist” today refer to Jewish supremacists and aggressive Jewish nationalists generally, especially those living outside Israel. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) is the most prominent or “visible” example of Jewish-Supremacism in the 20th century. It is often overlapping with Neoconservatism.

By the 1980s, a collection of ex-Trotskyist Jews formed the Neoconservative movement, which gained control of U.S. foreign policy by the 1990s and 2000s. The neoconservatives’ single aim is safeguarding Jewish interests while weakening European interests, particularly they aim to support the geopolitical interests of the Zionist State in Palestine. They typically use WASPs in badly fitted suits such as John Hagee and a whole band of Evangelical Zionists to act as their footsoldiers. By the 2000s, some major news media sectors, such as the Murdoch-owned Fox News network supported the neo-con wing of Jewish supremacy (while MSNBC and others support the cultural Marxist wing of Jewish supremacy).

Opposition to Jewish Supremacism has been widespread among Europeans throughout history and in contemporary times, some Mohammedans and Africans. Opponents are today called “anti-Semites” by Jewish supremacist media sources.

Link:

Jewish supremacism – Main Page – Metapedia

Fair Usage Law

November 14, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Community groups reject Brandis race hate reform

“I am in the process at the moment of going through those many submissions … [they] reflect a variety of views across the Australian community on what is an important and difficult issue”: Senator George Brandis. Photo: Wolter Peeters

An overwhelming majority of ethnic and community groups oppose the Abbott governments proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act.

As pressure builds on Attorney-General George Brandis to justify his crusade to throw out the so-called ”Bolt law” by watering down protections against racial vilification, an analysis of public submissions to the review of his draft bill reveals at least 60 groups have lined up against the changes.

They include the Law Council of Australia, the Arab Council of Australia, the Chinese Australian Forum, the ACTU, the Lebanese Muslim Association and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

A number of groups representing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders oppose it and on Wednesday, the head of the Prime Minister’s Indigenous Advisory Council, Warren Mundine, warned that the debate over race hate laws could derail the push for constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians.

Advertisement

Just four submissions made public so far support the idea of repealing Section 18C and D of the act.

One of those is the the Adelaide Institute, established by Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben.

Fairfax Media revealed Mr Toben has strongly backed the Abbott government’s plans in a personal submission that welcomed the proposal as a challenge to ”Jewish supremacism” in Australia. He described the current act as a ”flawed law, which only benefits Jewish-Zionist-Israeli interests” and effectively a ”Holocaust protection law”.

Senator Brandis this week told Parliament that he had received ”some thousands” of submissions but declined to answer a question from the opposition whether a single major community group had backed changes.

See the original post:

Community groups reject Brandis race hate reform

Fair Usage Law

May 14, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Kansas hate crime didnt emerge from a vacuum

By Ben Cohen/JNS.org

The Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City, one of the two sites of Frazier Glenn Crosss eve-of-Passover shooting spree. Credit: Facebook.

When you look at the image of Frazier Glenn Cross, AKA Glenn Miller, the shooter who cold-bloodedly murdered three Christians in a bloody eve-of-Passover spree at two Jewish community buildings in Overland Park, Kan., what do you see?

Ill tell you what I see. The dead-eyed stare, the pasty, blotched skin and lousy teeth, the unkempt facial hair this is exactly the kind of face we associate with anti-Semitic and racist thuggery. In the 20th century, Cross could have been a concentration camp guard, wearing his ignorant, vulgar sneer as he shoved his Jewish victims into a gas chamber, screaming barely literate, anti-Semitic epithets along the way.

As we mourn the dead, and agonize over the fact that security at Jewish institutions becomes more vulnerable when Jewish holidays draw near, we comfort ourselves by saying that such exemplary specimens of the Master Race as Cross are a rarity. Neo-Nazis are at the fringe of the fringe, most of them dont have the guts to go beyond harassing their enemies on social networks, and the odd individuals who do engage in violence unfortunately have easy access to guns. What this means is that Jews and other minorities have to occasionally shoulder atrocities like the one in Kansas. It absolutely does not mean that America is an anti-Semitic country, or that such attacks are a prelude to greater persecution.

One might add that the wider communitys reaction to the Overland Park murders showcased a humble, hard-working, tolerant America at its best. We suffer and we pull through just as we pulled through the shootings at Jewish Community Centers in Los Angeles in 1999 and Seattle in 2006. Just as French Jews pulled through 2012 murders by an Islamist of a rabbi and three beautiful children at a Jewish school in Toulouse. Just as Jews in Israel overcame the enormous pain that accompanied the Palestinian bombing of a Passover seder, which claimed the lives of 30 people, at a Netanya hotel in 2002.

But something is missing. By overly focusing on punks like Frazier Cross, theres a danger that we ignore those elements in our broader culture that sustain and inspire them.

Look at some of the posts that Cross left on various neo-Nazi and white supremacist bulletin boards, and youll see what I mean. Amidst his hate-drenched rants against Jews, he warmly recommended an article by Jew journalist Max Blumenthal, whom he complimented for exposing Israels attemptto buy the presidential election for the neo-con, war-mongering republican establishment the k*kes simply do not trust a lame-duck black president with the name Hussein. (Incidentally, its not unheard of for Nazis to recommend certain Jewish authors Hitler himself reportedly described Otto Weininger, a Viennese Jewish philosopher who lambasted the modern Jewish era, as a rare example of a Jew he admired.)

Its not an accident that todays Nazis are attracted to left-wing, viscerally anti-Zionist writers like Blumenthal. Both share the view that the so-called Israel Lobby drove the U.S. into foreign wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both believe that politicians kowtow to Jewish interests because they fear the costs of not doing so. And both are convinced that the type of Jewish supremacism practiced in Israel makes a nonsense of American Jewish appeals for tolerance and understanding.

Here is the original post:

Kansas hate crime didnt emerge from a vacuum

Fair Usage Law

April 24, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Topic Race Mixing and Jewish Supremacism YouTube – Video



Topic Race Mixing and Jewish Supremacism YouTube

By: archer light

Read more from the original source:

Topic Race Mixing and Jewish Supremacism YouTube – Video

Fair Usage Law

April 6, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

The Murder of Mary Phagan and Aborted Apotheosis of Leo Frank, part 1

Published by admin, on April 26th, 2014American Dissident Voices broadcast of April 26, 2014Listen to the broadcastDownload23:12by Kevin Alfred StromLEO FRANK was a Jewish sex killer who was president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith — and who was re-elected to that post even after his conviction. Frank was tried and found guilty of the strangulation of […]

Fair Usage Law

April 26, 2015   Posted in: Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League, B'nai B'rith, Hate Crime Hoax, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Lobby, Jewish Supremacism, Jews, John de Nugent, Judaism, Ku Klux Klan, Leo Frank, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, White Nationalism  Comments Closed

Jewish Supremacism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening on the Jewish Question is a 2003 book by former Klansman and white supremacist David Duke.[1] In it, Duke weaves together different Antisemitic canards to present a conspiracy theory alleging a Jewish plot to take over the world.[2][3] In 2007, an “updated and expanded” version was released. Duke has pushed the book’s translation and publication in a number of languages.[4] Jewish Supremacism elaborates on his previous book, My Awakening, in which he claims that the different races of humanity can only fight, and that non-white races must ultimately lose. Duke presents Jews as predatory oppressors in his attempt to defend antisemitism. Jewish Supremacism takes this theme further, arguing that Jews collectively believe they are a superior race. Duke reinterprets history to fit his argument. For example, he claims that: Duke attempts to establish motive by misquoting out-of-context passages from ancient Jewish writings, claiming that they prove that the majority of modern Jews believe they should rule the world.[2][4] Duke promoted the book on his site by comparing it to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,[6] Duke also toured Spain,[7] Sweden, Hungary,[8] and Russia to promote the book. Duke’s visit to Russia prompted the Anti-Defamation League to urge a criminal case against the book’s author and publisher under Russia’s anti-hate crime laws.[9]

Fair Usage Law

March 5, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jewish Racism: Ron Paul’s Ties to Jewish Supremacism and …

Christopher Jon Bjerknes http://www.jewishracism.com http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com Ron Paul is closely tied to the late Ludwig von Mises through his ideas and the institute which bears his name. Ludwig von Mises was in turn closely tied to the Jewish supremacist and organizer of World Government, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi promoted the idea of a European Union and a pan-American Union. Rothschild and Warburg sponsored him. Coudenhove-Kalergi also stated that the Jews are a superior race which should lead the World, but that all the other races should be mixed, which according to him would result in the manifestation of the worst traits and the disappearance of the best traits in the Gentile races. Zionist British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli had made similar claims. Coudenhove-Kalergi wanted the different “races” to mix in intermarriage so that the children of these unions would be inferior to their parents and would lose any sense of cultural and ethnic heritage. He wanted to then substitute a new culture of obedience and servitude among this new degenerated “race”, subservience to a ruling Jewish elite. He would have the Jews remain nobly segregated and preserve them as rulers over all others. It is a fact that many of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s policies have been instituted. Ron Paul is fronting for these von Misian forces. Eustace Mullins wrote of Ludwig von Mises and Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Melchior Palyi, in ‘The Twilight of Gold’, reveals the power plays of the World Order in international finance, when he quotes from the Diary of Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France. Palyi says, ‘In October, 1926, Governor Emile Moreau of the Bank of France sent his closest collaborator to London to explore the intentions of Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England. Pierre Quesnay, then general manager of the Bank of France 1926-30, and Bank for International Settlements 1930-37, brought back a report which was recorded by Moreau : ‘Quesnay also gives me interesting views about the ambitions of Montagu Norman and the group of financiers who surround him: Sir Otto Niemeyer, Sir Arthur Salter, Sir Henry Strakosch, Sir Robert Kindersley they are striving to make London the great international financial centre. But those close to Norman state this is not his objective … he wants more than anything else to witness the setting up of links between the various banks of issue … The economic and financial organization of the world appears to the Governor of the Bank of England to be the major task of the Twentieth Century. In his view politicians and political institutions are in no fit state to direct with the necessary competence and continuity this task of organization which he would like to see undertaken by central banks, independent at once of governments and of private finance. Hence his campaign in favour of completely autonomous central banks, dominating their own financial markets and deriving their power from common agreement among themselves. They would succeed in taking out of the political realm those problems which are essential for the development and prosperity of the national financial security, distribution of credit, movement of prices. They would thus prevent internal political struggles from harming the wealth and the economic advancement of nations.’ In short, Norman wished to see the imposition of the World Order over the financial affairs of the nations. It was this agreement among the central banks, rather than the front organization, the League of Nations, which became their final instrument of power. Crucial to these arrangements was the monetarist school, the Austrian School of Economics, an outgrowth of the Pan-Europe movement. Margit Herzfeld notes in her biography of Ludwig von Mises that he participated in Count Coudenhove-Kalergi’s Pan Europe movement in 1943. He had been brought to the U.S. in 1940 by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation of $2500 a year to work at the Natl. Bureau of Economic Research, which grant was renewed in 1943. Von Mises’ pupils, Arthur Burns and Milton Friedman now expound the monetarist theory through a network of supersecret ‘conservative’ think tanks led by the Mont Pelerin Society. Herzfeld says that von Mises’ most famous protege was the Soviet apologist Murray Rothbard.”Eustace Mullins, “The Rule of the Order”, The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, Chapter Eight. Paul wants to create private gold banks, which obviously will be international and become the centralized entirely private Jewish controlled World bank Paul’s bosses seek to institute as a mechanism of World control. This new Jewish monopoly on banking and gold will give World Jewry even greater control over money and it will be entirely detached from any country’s government. This is the ultimate privatization of money creation and money supply which International Jewry has always sought. Even the system described in Carroll Quigley’s book does not give World Jewry the power they will obtain under Ron Paul’s system, which extant system has already done so much harm to the Third World and the American dollar, Ron Paul was heavily promoted by the Hollywood Zionist Jew Aaron Russo, who claimed a close personal friendship with the Rockefeller family and who didn’t want us to talk about “Jewish bankers”. Paul’s ties to leading Zionists and his promotion by gold merchants and prominent figures in the “911 truth movement” who shy away from the proven Zionist Jewish and Israeli connection to 911, has been documented by others.

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jews, Race, and Nicholas Wade: How Jewish Supremacism …

By Dr. J. Williams Phd. A fascinating insight into how Jewish Supremacists attempt to guard the gates of scientific debate on race has come with the new book, A Troublesome Inheritance, by well-known science journalist, Nicholas Wade. The book, launched on May 6 this year, sprang to prominence with an article promoting the work published in Time magazine, written by Wade, titled What Science Says About Race and Genetics. (Wade is, by the way, a former science editor of the New York Times who retired two years ago, and there is no truth to the internet-based rumor that he was sacked after writing his latest book). In the articlewhich is largely a summary of some of the salient points of his new bookWade admits what Dr. David Duke and many others have long maintainedthat there is indeed a biological basis to raceand that the existence of these differences should not in any way be used to denigrate any individual or make any assessment as to their moral worth. All people, as Dr. Duke has repeatedly said, have an equal right to freedom, liberty, lifeand the right to maintain their own identity without domination or oppression by any other people. In his article, Wade echoes Dr. Duke in this way: A longstanding orthodoxy among social scientists holds that human races are a social construct and have no biological basis. In the decade since the decoding of the human genome, a growing wealth of data has made clear that these two positions, never at all likely to begin with, are simply incorrect.

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

4. What Zionist and Anti-Zionist Jews Have Said About …

4. What Zionist And Anti-Zionist Jews Have Said About: Jewish Supremacism The thought of creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought of the Almighty when creating the Universe. Teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac.” (Bereshith Rabba 1,5) God has distinguished us from the rest of mankind. Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, Rambni, Rambam, Moses Maimonides), Mishneh Torah A Jew, by the fact that he belongs to the chosen people and is circumcised, possesses so great a dignity that no one, not even an angel, can share equality with him. In fact, he is considered almost the equal of God. Pranaitis, I.B., The Talmud Unmasked, Imperial Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1892, p. 60 We are not only different from all the nations, set apart by a historical experience that is unique and unparalleled, but we are also of a much higher and greater spiritual order. Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook Quoted in A.I. Kook, Orat, Second Edition, Jerusalem, 1950; English translation in A. herzberg, The Zionist idea, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1959, pp 419-431, at 422, 425, 427 The Jewish people constitutes a separate entity, a species unique in Creation, differing from nations in the same manner as man differs from the beast or the beast from the plant … although Jews are physically similar to all other men, yet they are endowed [sic] with a ‘second soul’ that renders them a separate species. Rabbi Judah Halevy (famous medieval poet and philosopher) in his ‘Kuzari,Zimmer, Uriel, Torah- Judaism and the State of Israel, Congregation Kehillath Yaakov, Inc., NY, 5732 1972, p. 12 A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A free thinker and atheist always remains a Jew. Jewish World, London, December 14, 1922 The Jews are not a part of a vast Whole which they re-integrate in dying, but they are a Whole in themselves, defying space, time, life, and death. Can God be outside the Whole? If he exists, necessarily he confounds himself with this Whole. … Thus Divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the Race – passionnel entity, eternal flame, it is the Divine essence. It must be preserved and perpetuated, therefore the idea of pure and impure was created. Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, 1929 The creating the Jewish People preceded every other thought of the Almighty when creating the Universe. Teaching of Rabbi Samuel bar Isaac. Bereshith Rabba 1,5 a fulfillment of a number of commands of Jewish religious law…Among Goldstein’s good deeds, as enumerated, are…taking revenge on non-Jews, extermination of the non-Jews who are from the seed of Amalek…and the sanctification of the Holy Name. Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, head of the Kever Yossev Yeshiva (school of Talmud) in Nablus, in praise of the infamous machine-gunning to death of Palestinian worshippers by Baruch Goldstein

Fair Usage Law

February 6, 2015   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Jewish supremacism – Main Page – Metapedia

From Metapedia Jewish supremacism is the belief, and promotion of the belief, that the Jews are superior to all others and should rightfully have control over non-Jews in all matters. The religion of Talmudic Judaism itself claims that the Jews are a race “chosen” by God ahead of the rest of humanity. Jewish supremacists believe that they are morally, intellectually, religuously and genetically superior. The purpose of this belief is to have an excuse to commit crimes such as the black slave trade, the Red Holocaust and Zionism. These crimes are used to establish social, political, historical and/or industrial dominance by Jews. The supremacist views are often “supported” by fallacious scientific research of which the outcome is predetermined so that the supremacist views are “confirmed”. Jewish supremacism is rooted in ethnocentrism and a desire for hegemony and power, and has frequently resulted in violence against non-Jews. Different forms of Jewish supremacism have different conceptions of who is considered Jew, and not all Jewish supremacist organizations agree on who is their greatest enemy. Jewish supremacism distinguishes itself from other forms of supremacism, as Jewish supremacist groups can be found in all countries with a Jewish minority or majority population, whereas this cannot be said of other forms of supremacism: for example not all, countries with a black minority also have black supremacist groups. Unfortunately, in most countries even militant Jewish supremacist organizations are not watched closely by law enforcement officials, but instead often subsidized by the governments under influence of the Zionist lobby. Jewish-Supremacism has taken many forms all representing various Jewish survival strategies. It can be argued that many of these strategies that have emerged have been instinctual rather than conspiratorial. Some have been subtle, and others openly genocidal. What all share is a desire by powerful Jews to 1.) Get gentiles to fight on their behalf, 2.) Weaken gentiles, 3.) Strengthen the relative position of Jews. The end-goal is said to be setting up a world “safe for Jews”, in which other nations are too weakened to oppose them, e.g. by miscegenation. The early Bolshevik leadership in Russia was mostly Jewish. Many communist movements worldwide were heavily Jewish, including the CPUSA. The Red Holocaust in Europe, when tens of millions of Christians were killed in the name of Communism, was an ultraviolent instance of Jewish supremacism. (See also: Ilya Ehrenburg). Israel maintains supremacy in the Levant, and maintains an ethnostate through the use of terror. It considers non-Jews to be second-class citizens and bans intermarriage. Although “Zionism” was originally a movement to create a Jewish state for the first time since the breakup of Khazaria, the term “Zionism” and “Zionist” today refer to Jewish supremacists and aggressive Jewish nationalists generally, especially those living outside Israel. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) is the most prominent or “visible” example of Jewish-Supremacism in the 20th century. It is often overlapping with Neoconservatism. By the 1980s, a collection of ex-Trotskyist Jews formed the Neoconservative movement, which gained control of U.S. foreign policy by the 1990s and 2000s. The neoconservatives’ single aim is safeguarding Jewish interests while weakening European interests, particularly they aim to support the geopolitical interests of the Zionist State in Palestine. They typically use WASPs in badly fitted suits such as John Hagee and a whole band of Evangelical Zionists to act as their footsoldiers. By the 2000s, some major news media sectors, such as the Murdoch-owned Fox News network supported the neo-con wing of Jewish supremacy (while MSNBC and others support the cultural Marxist wing of Jewish supremacy). Opposition to Jewish Supremacism has been widespread among Europeans throughout history and in contemporary times, some Mohammedans and Africans. Opponents are today called “anti-Semites” by Jewish supremacist media sources.

Fair Usage Law

November 14, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Community groups reject Brandis race hate reform

“I am in the process at the moment of going through those many submissions … [they] reflect a variety of views across the Australian community on what is an important and difficult issue”: Senator George Brandis. Photo: Wolter Peeters An overwhelming majority of ethnic and community groups oppose the Abbott governments proposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act. As pressure builds on Attorney-General George Brandis to justify his crusade to throw out the so-called ”Bolt law” by watering down protections against racial vilification, an analysis of public submissions to the review of his draft bill reveals at least 60 groups have lined up against the changes. They include the Law Council of Australia, the Arab Council of Australia, the Chinese Australian Forum, the ACTU, the Lebanese Muslim Association and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. A number of groups representing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders oppose it and on Wednesday, the head of the Prime Minister’s Indigenous Advisory Council, Warren Mundine, warned that the debate over race hate laws could derail the push for constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians. Advertisement Just four submissions made public so far support the idea of repealing Section 18C and D of the act. One of those is the the Adelaide Institute, established by Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben. Fairfax Media revealed Mr Toben has strongly backed the Abbott government’s plans in a personal submission that welcomed the proposal as a challenge to ”Jewish supremacism” in Australia. He described the current act as a ”flawed law, which only benefits Jewish-Zionist-Israeli interests” and effectively a ”Holocaust protection law”. Senator Brandis this week told Parliament that he had received ”some thousands” of submissions but declined to answer a question from the opposition whether a single major community group had backed changes.

Fair Usage Law

May 14, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Kansas hate crime didnt emerge from a vacuum

By Ben Cohen/JNS.org The Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City, one of the two sites of Frazier Glenn Crosss eve-of-Passover shooting spree. Credit: Facebook. When you look at the image of Frazier Glenn Cross, AKA Glenn Miller, the shooter who cold-bloodedly murdered three Christians in a bloody eve-of-Passover spree at two Jewish community buildings in Overland Park, Kan., what do you see? Ill tell you what I see. The dead-eyed stare, the pasty, blotched skin and lousy teeth, the unkempt facial hair this is exactly the kind of face we associate with anti-Semitic and racist thuggery. In the 20th century, Cross could have been a concentration camp guard, wearing his ignorant, vulgar sneer as he shoved his Jewish victims into a gas chamber, screaming barely literate, anti-Semitic epithets along the way. As we mourn the dead, and agonize over the fact that security at Jewish institutions becomes more vulnerable when Jewish holidays draw near, we comfort ourselves by saying that such exemplary specimens of the Master Race as Cross are a rarity. Neo-Nazis are at the fringe of the fringe, most of them dont have the guts to go beyond harassing their enemies on social networks, and the odd individuals who do engage in violence unfortunately have easy access to guns. What this means is that Jews and other minorities have to occasionally shoulder atrocities like the one in Kansas. It absolutely does not mean that America is an anti-Semitic country, or that such attacks are a prelude to greater persecution. One might add that the wider communitys reaction to the Overland Park murders showcased a humble, hard-working, tolerant America at its best. We suffer and we pull through just as we pulled through the shootings at Jewish Community Centers in Los Angeles in 1999 and Seattle in 2006. Just as French Jews pulled through 2012 murders by an Islamist of a rabbi and three beautiful children at a Jewish school in Toulouse. Just as Jews in Israel overcame the enormous pain that accompanied the Palestinian bombing of a Passover seder, which claimed the lives of 30 people, at a Netanya hotel in 2002. But something is missing. By overly focusing on punks like Frazier Cross, theres a danger that we ignore those elements in our broader culture that sustain and inspire them. Look at some of the posts that Cross left on various neo-Nazi and white supremacist bulletin boards, and youll see what I mean. Amidst his hate-drenched rants against Jews, he warmly recommended an article by Jew journalist Max Blumenthal, whom he complimented for exposing Israels attemptto buy the presidential election for the neo-con, war-mongering republican establishment the k*kes simply do not trust a lame-duck black president with the name Hussein. (Incidentally, its not unheard of for Nazis to recommend certain Jewish authors Hitler himself reportedly described Otto Weininger, a Viennese Jewish philosopher who lambasted the modern Jewish era, as a rare example of a Jew he admired.) Its not an accident that todays Nazis are attracted to left-wing, viscerally anti-Zionist writers like Blumenthal. Both share the view that the so-called Israel Lobby drove the U.S. into foreign wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both believe that politicians kowtow to Jewish interests because they fear the costs of not doing so. And both are convinced that the type of Jewish supremacism practiced in Israel makes a nonsense of American Jewish appeals for tolerance and understanding.

Fair Usage Law

April 24, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed

Topic Race Mixing and Jewish Supremacism YouTube – Video




Topic Race Mixing and Jewish Supremacism YouTube By: archer light

Fair Usage Law

April 6, 2014   Posted in: Jewish Supremacism  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."