Archive for the ‘Judaism’ Category

The Truth about Leo Frank and Mary Phagan

Leo Frank was a criminal who murdered a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan in 1913. Because he was the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith (essentially, Brotherhood of the Chosen), many Jews from across the US worked in a concerted movement to free him for the crime, with one Jewish donor alone donating $100,000 towards Frank’s defense (equivalent to over $2 million today).

Many Jews argued that racist Gentiles in the deep South were simply persecuting Frank because he was Jewish, and wanted to let the real criminal, a Black man, go free – because everyone knows how much Whites in the deep South prefer Black rapist child-murderers to White Jews (written with obvious sarcasm) – or so some Jews with their deficient arguments claimed.

While unsuccessful in their attempts to secure a new trial, with appeals up to the Supreme Court being denied based on the evidence, B’nai B’rith was successful with getting the governor (who had been a law partner with Frank’s defense team) to change the murderer Frank’s sentence from death to life imprisonment.

The public was outraged because of the child-murderer Frank being freed. Frank had reportedly raped Mary Phagan, according to some accounts. However, it may not have simply been a sex-crime. Indeed, it may have been a much more depraved act than has been admitted, as noted in the Brief of Evidence (part 1 – linked – see p. 11). Read Newt Lee’s testimony at the Frank trial, describing Mary Phagan’s body when initially found:

“Her face was punctured, full of holes and was swollen and black. She had a cut on the left-side of her head, as if she had been struck, and there was a little blood there. The cord was around her neck, sunk into her flesh.”

Punctured? Full of holes? She had been tied with cords? Other testimony, however, while showing that she was indeed strangled to death, suggests that the head wounds may have been caused by a blunt instrument. Whatever the case may have been, it was a hideous crime nevertheless–one for which Frank undoubtedly deserved the death sentence.

Governor John Slaton was not re-elected because of his decision to commute Frank’s sentence. The prosecuting attorney in the Frank case, Hugh Dorsey, ended up being elected to governor for his ethical and civil behavior in getting Frank his just death sentence. Thomas Watson, who undauntedly informed the public about the true nature of the Frank case, was elected to the Senate. And, some Southerners who were concerned about justice being lost decided to give Frank the death sentence he rightly deserved–to hang Frank themselves.

Later, in 1986, after years of trying to get the sentence changed, due to the efforts of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (with the ADL having been formed due to the Frank case, as many aristocratic Jews sought to help Frank due to him being the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith), Frank was pardoned by the prison parole board. The parole board pardoned him not because he was innocent but because that the board felt that citizens, working as vigilantes to ensure justice was met, somehow deprived Frank of his rights.

Read about the case of Leo Frank – born in blood – that caused B’nai B’rith so much distress that they effectively covered it up today:

http://www.honestmediatoday.com/leo_frank.htm

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith Responds to Filthy Jewish Terrorists

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

B’nai Brith Canada calls on Attorney-General to immediately lay hate crime charges against genocide-advocating York student

TORONTO, 2010 – B’nai Brith Canada has called on Ontario Attorney-General Chris Bentley to move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Salman Hossain, a Bangladeshi-Canadian York University student who has allegedly called for a “genocide [to] be perpetrated against the Jewish populations of North America and Europe” on a website apparently owned by him. Yesterday, York University suspended Hossain pending his appearance at a disciplinary panel. Three years ago, Hossain made news for posting messages supporting terrorist attacks in Canada. At that time, the OPP investigated the matter but the Attorney-General decided against pressing charges.

“The hateful writing is on the wall and the Attorney-General must move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Hossain,” said Frank Dimant, Executive Vice President of B’nai Brith Canada. “Just recently, every political party in the Ontario Legislature came together and showed their commitment to fighting hatred in Ontario. While we appreciate their condemnation of the hate-fest know as ‘Israel Apartheid Week,’ it is now crucial that that commitment is followed up with concrete action.

“The website, which despite the announced investigation continues to be accessible, outrageously calls for the genocide of the Jewish people in North America and Europe, in addition to smearing Christians and moderate Muslims, and supporting terrorist attacks against Canadians. Hossain’s alleged posts clearly dictate that the Attorney-General should waste no time in moving forward with charges against him.”

B’nai Brith Canada has been active in Canada since 1875 as the Jewish community’s foremost human rights agency

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/

Fair Usage Law

November 25, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Racism News, Racist News, Tel Aviv, West Bank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

by Paul Goldstein

Rev A – See Notes

(from http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf – 12 MB pdf image-file)

Since the time of Philo of Alexandria, as before him, the religion of the antiprogress, landed oligarchy has been and is Isis worship. Through the intervening centuries, the high priesthood of the Isis cult has consciously directed one of its prime strategic efforts toward molding a small fraction of Jews, the “selected ones,” into an evil pseudo-religious cult. Drawing on the cult rituals of the mystical “Covenant” promise of return to the “Land of Zion,” and the irrational Cabala tradition of Judaism, the oligarchy’s priesthood formed from among its own secret society, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, a “Jewish” Masonic order. That order is the B’nai B’rith; its purpose to serve as defenders of the faith of the oligarchy against the threat of Neoplatonic humanism.

With the 1603 coup that “restored” the Stuart dynasty to the English throne, the seat of the oligarchy moved to Britain, where it remains to the present day. Beginning in the 18th century, the primary strategic threat to the oligarchy was the emergence of an institutionalized expression of Neoplatonic humanism in the form of the American republic’s stated founding commitment to generalized scientific and technological progress. Against that republic the British-centered oligarchy has thrown its entire arsenal of subversion, to and including the assassinations of at least three American Presidents.

The B’nai B’rith, as the oligarchy’s agents-in-place in America, has functioned as the clearinghouse for British subversion against the American republic. Therefore, the story of the B’nai B’rith, its Isis-cult roots, its 136-year record of treason against the United States, is essential to understanding who and what our enemy is, how it operates, and how we will destroy it.

BRITAIN’S “JEWISH IDEA”

The official history of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the parent cult to the “Jewish” Masonic order of B’nai B’rith, testifies to the built-in, viciously antireligious bias of the Rite’s cultist outlook, and the so-called Jewish influence in its historical development.

Masonry derives much of its ceremonial practices from the Collegia of Rome and their prototype, the Ernoi of Greece. In these societies the pattern of imitation was the Sun God under the name of Dionysus…, whose death and resurrection formed the main theme. In Masonry their place has been taken by Hiram as the type of Sun, whose name is derived from light. These are traces of Jewish influences on the Craft. Perhaps the reason for this may lie in the fact that when the Baccaric were suppressed in Rome Caesar permitted the Jews “and only these” to continue their rites. The placing of the Jewish Scriptures on the Altars of Masonry as the Volume of the Sacred Law may be due to the tenacity with which the Semitic Race clung to the conception of the Unity of the Deity. “Hear, O Israel — Tetragammation — Our God Tetragammation — Unity” was the rally cry of the “Chosen People.”

The cult outlook becomes even clearer by examining and comparing a relatively buried account recorded by a member of the order at the time of the B’nai B’rith’s founding. The official journal The Menorah stated:

Their reunions were frequent and several of them being members of existing benevolent societies, especially of the order of Free Masons and Odd Fellows, they finally concluded that a somewhat similar organization, but based upon the “Jewish idea” would best obtain their object.

The Jewish religion has many observances and customs corresponding to the secret societies known to us. The synagogue, for instance, might be compared to a lodge room. It used to be open twice a day; for a Jew desiring to find a friend, he had but to go there and make themselves known by a certain sign and token The sign consisted of a grip with a full hand and the magical word Sholem Alachem. The messussah on the doorpost was the countersign, Shema Israel (Hear, O Israel — ed.) was the password. (emphasis added.)

Known as the “Order of the Sons of the Covenant,” the B’nai B’rith came into existence under the personal direction of the Earl of Shaftesbury, Lord Palmerston, who was the Grand Patriarch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and their “Hofjuden” (Court Jew) accomplices, Sir Moses Montefiore and the family of the Rothschilds. In a July 1841 memorandum to Foreign Minister Palmerston, written in part as a motivation for the then recent founding of the “Colonization of Palestine Society,” Shaftesbury described the usefulness of the Jews for British strategic intentions, an idea elaborated as follows in his biography, The Life and Work of the Earl of Shaftesbury;

They (the Jews —ed . ) have ancient reminiscences and deep affection for the land …; they are almost everywhere, accustomed to arbitrary rule and being totally indifferent to political objects, confine their hopes to the enjoyment of what people to habits of endurance and self-denial (are accustomed ) they will submit to the existing form of government having no preconceived theories to gratify, and having almost everywhere trained in implicit obedience to autocratic rule ”

Financing for the British colonization scheme was arranged by Queen Victoria’s “favorite Jew” Sir Moses Montefiore, who, along with his brother-in-law Nathaniel Rothschild, used their financial conduits in the United States as a major feature of the plan. The Montefiore Society, the North American Relief Society for Poor Jews in Palestine, the Widows’ and Orphan Fund, plus dozens of other benevolent societies, provided the funds to establish a “Jewish homeland.”

From its inception in 1843, the American side of this operation, the B’nai B’rith, functioned not only as a secret Masonic cult to undermine the humanist Judaic tradition of Philo of Alexandria but, moreover, to use American Jews as part of Britain’s strategic design to destroy the American republic. The special role assigned to the leadership of the “Jewish” Masonic cult was to facilitate the deployment of numerous secret societies and cults the British had implanted in the U.S. during the last decade of the 18th century and the first half of the 19th century.

Working with the Anglican-American heresy tendency among the Jesuits and B’nai B’rith under the direction of the British Secret Intelligence Service, the “mother cult” Scottish Rite created numerous secret societies and cults modeled to varying degrees on the cult of Dionysus. The Transcendentalists, the Know-Nothings, the abolitionists, the secessionists of the Knights of the Golden Circle, and more, including the post-Civil War Ku Klux Klan, were synthetically created to participate in subverting U.S. institutions and leaders. Among the crimes committed by these networks were the assassinations of three U.S. Presidents; the sabotage of the American System economic program; and the undermining of the population’s belief in Reason and its product, Progress, as the guiding force of the U.S.’s and global development.

One humanist Jewish visitor to the U.S., Israel Joseph Benjamin, writing in his book Three Years in America, 1859-62 , commented on the B’nai B’rith: “This is a secret society, like the Freemasons with passwords and the like and was quite a new phenomenon for me … still I think the existence of such a society not at all necessary. Benjamin’s remarks, in contrast to standard portrayals of the B’nai B’rith as a “benevolent society” dedicated to defending and propagating “Jewish heritage” in the United States, are not only accurate, but place those authorities of the “benevolent viewpoint” in the category of the morally insane.

MOTHER CULTS AND CULTISTS

Under the Black Guelphs’ Knights of St. John Of Jerusalem, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry emerged as the aristocracy’s major political secret intelligence operation against humanist forces throughout Europe and the Mediterranean over several centuries. Officially, the Scottish Rite did not surface as the “mother cult” until the 18th century, but its roots are directly traceable to the destruction of the city-building Knights Templar in the 14th century, and to King Robert Bruce of Scotland, who declared himself “Grand Master of the Order of Heredom de Kilwinning,” the predecessor of the Scottish Rite.

The wave of repression begun by King Robert Bruce against the Knights Templar and their allies among the Philo-oriented Jews of Europe during the 14th-17th centuries, offered an early occasion for “Zionist project” recruitment and profiling of “selected Jews.” The symbiotic relationship that developed between the Jewish “chosen ones” and the knights of St. John of Jerusalem stemmed from the unique services the Jewish merchant banking families offered the Knights of St. John, under the overall control of the Genoese-Roman black nobility families.

The “selected Jews” were assigned a twofold task in the designs of the black nobility. First, by papal edict they were permitted to participate in usurious mercantile “money-lending” practices among the larger masses of Jews — those, that is, who did not flee to Greece, Turkey, and the Eastern Mediterranean — who were being herded into ghettos and victimized in the pogroms. Second, the “selected Jews” were to employ Cabalistic mysticism as a form of “mass-brainwashing” control over ghettoized Jews, creating false messiahs and holding out promises of salvation in the Land of Zion.

One Jewish writer recounts the story of one such false prophet produced during the period of the pogroms named Abraham Abulafia. “Abulafia, was a Cabalist,… to him the Bible was one huge cipher. He was able to rise to heights of ecstasy by concentrating on the letters of the Scripture, not on words or sentences, but on individual letters, combined and recombined in an infinite number of forms.”

One of the biggest frauds perpetrated during the 13th century, and which had a lasting impact on Jews into the 18th century, was the publication of Zohar, the Book of Splendor. In keeping with the priesthood tradition of the Pharisees, the “selected Jews” used Zohar as the outstanding “Talmudic”-type text for interpreting Moses’ law and for creating a distorted version of the Mosaic “Covenant.” Commenting on the Zohar, Jewish scholar Bernard Bamberger states, “The Zohar was put before the public by Moses de Leon, a well-known cabalist; (it) was composed in moments of exaltation and high emotional stress and its author no doubt believed himself to be writing under direct divine guidance.”

Mere publication of such texts or the emergence of mystic leaders in the hideous ghettos was not enough for the black nobility, however. Several “return to the Land of Zion” projects financed by the King of Portugal and his “selected Jewish financiers” were carried out over a period of time. In 1524, for example, David Reubeni and Solomon Molcho, self-proclaimed emissaries of the “Ten Lost Tribes,” arrived in Venice and traveled through northern Italy calling for “Holy War” against the Turks so that the Jews could return to their homeland and so that the Messiah could reveal himself. Theirs was a short-lived project — Reubeni ended up in prison, while Molcho was burned at the stake.

Perhaps the most infamous of these “self-appointed” messiahs was Sabbatai Zevi, who had gathered a vast following among Turkish Jews in the 1640s. After several years of intensive study of the Cabala, Sabbatai proclaimed himself the Messiah and by 1648, with the Jewish population inundated in the belief that 1648 was the year of the advent of the Messiah, Sabbatai launched his campaign. One account described Sabbatai as a “devoted student of the Cabala, (who) began to indulge in practices that kindled the hope of his enthusiasts”; Sabbatai’s aim was to restore Palestine to “Jewish control.” An indication of the source of his messianic zeal is that Sabbatai’s father had been for years in contact with certain British merchants seeking to break open the Turkish Empire’s control over the Near East.

Our historical research to date reveals these 17th century messiah projects to be the direct result of work done at Oxford and Cambridge Universities, where Hebraic “scholarship” had been restored under the direction of the leading priests of the Black Guelph oligarchy in Britain, Sir Francis Bacon and Robert Cecil. The Fifth Earl of Shaftesbury, who, with others, enabled the Genoese-Dutch banking interests aligned with the Bruce dynasty to defeat humanism in England under Elizabeth I and laid the basis for destroying Cromwell’s Commonwealth, shaped the Oxford and Cambridge projects.

As Scottish Rite historian Henry Evans develops in his book, The History of the Scottish and York Rite of Freemasonry,” it (the Scottish Rite) has been allied with the Jacobite movement (cult of fundamentalism — ed.) in Scotland and England, and with the Cabalistic (Jews) and Rosicrucian societies in Europe….” Pointing unmistakably to the direct interconnection between the early Scottish Rite and the Cabalistic societies’ promotion of the “Jewish idea,” Evans states further that the key figure of the mid-17th century, after Bacon’s death, was Elias Ashmole.

Ashmole is, in fact, perhaps the most important figure in the development of the Scottish Rite and the “Jewish idea” project for Zionism — Ashmole, that is, and his band of Oxford cultists including William Lilly, Christopher Wren, Sir Edward Dugsdale, and Dr. Robert Plot. In an 1880s official Scottish Rite biography of Ashmole, Dudley Wright states: “Ashmole was made a mason in 1645 at Warrington, a society of Rosicrucians formed in London on the principles established in Germany about 1604, and partly perhaps in the plan of Literary Societies, allegorically described in (Sir Francis) Bacon’s New Atlantis as the House of Solomon; …”

Ashmole and his Scottish Rite cultists reorganized Oxford University for the purpose of resurrecting the ancient cult of Hermes occult practices of the Egyptian priesthood, fully integrating ancient Hebraic scriptures and the Cabala into these rituals. By directing the research projects, by setting up the Scottish Rite Organization, and by founding the Ashmole Museum, Elias Ashmole institutionalized the beginnings of the modern “Zionist project.”

In commenting on these activities, Sir John Alexander Cockburn and Oxford biographer C.H. Joster have shown clearly the relationship between the Scottish Rite practices and the Cabala. Cockburn writes: “Christopher Wren maintained that the Scottish Rite derived its origin from the symbolic minds of the Eastern Races and was imported into Europe by the Crusaders, who thinking to subdue the Saracens, were themselves made captive by the enchantment of the Eastern mysticism and the Jewish Cabala’ (emphasis added). Joster added: “In Feb. 1652, Ashmole added yet another subject to his learned pursuits. The practice of engraving magic sigils with Cabalistic signs and related studies he had brought to his notice on Judaic sources which made Hebrew most desirable” (emphasis added).

The purpose of ritualized mystical cult practices became clear when, in 1763, the first official Hofjuden institution, the Board of Jewish Deputies, was created by the British oligarchy to oversee the “Jewish idea” project. The board was composed of Cabalistic rabbis and Hofjuden financiers, including the Montefiores, the Sebags and, later, the Rothschilds. The board was the brainchild of the “Hebraic studies” project of Ashmole and Rabbi Solomon Frank, who converted to Anglicanism after the 1603 Stuart Restoration but continued to work with Ashmole. Ashmole, for example, recorded in his diary lessons in Hebrew scriptures given by Rabbi Frank.

Sir Robert Gould reports in his five-volume work on the Library of Freemasonry that the Hebrew words “Akiman Rezon” or “akim” (brothers), “manah” (to appoint), and “ratzon” (to select) were chanted as part of the daily ritual of the Hofjuden deputies as they went about their tasks.

Many of the first rabbis to come to America had been trained by the Ashmolean-Oxford school and the Anglican Church-created British and Foreign School Society, which was founded in 1807 as a direct continuation of the earlier Ashmole project.

EARLY NETWORKS OF THE “SELECTED JEWS”

Prior to the emergence of a “Jewish” Masonic cult, the high priesthood of the oligarchy relied upon the already established network of Jewish merchant families that were part of the old Dutch West Indies gold and slave trade. Practically all of these so-called Sephardic Jews had been in the United States since the late 18th century and some even from the 17th century. Most were the initiating members of the U.S. wing of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

Based in New York City, Charleston, South Carolina and other southern cities including Baltimore, these “selected Jewish” merchants operated as part of Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service networks. Among them were Moses Cohen, Moses Levi, Isaac Da Costa, and Moses Peixotto, who organized the initial web of associations called the Hebrew Benevolent and Hebrew Orphan Aid Societies — the earliest of which was founded by Mendes Lopez in Charlestown in 1784. Numerous Hebrew Literary Societies were set up alongside these benevolent organizations.

It is important simply to note here, for development further on, that Judah P. Benjamin, later Secretary of War and Secretary of State of the Confederacy — and the man who more than likely gave the order for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln — was recruited into the Charleston Hebrew Orphan Aid Society in 1827.

At the outset the benevolent associations were either simple extensions of the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem Hospitallers (hospitals and hospices) or of the “Literary Societies” of Sir Walter Scott and Sir Isaac Disraeli. Disraeli’s History of the Jews in England provided the ideological bond and historical justification for the Hofjuden’s servile relationship to the oligarchy, while Sir Walter Scott’s feudalist extravaganza novel, Ivanhoe, glorified that theme — colored, of course, with Scott’s typical anti-Semitic emphasis. Scott’s heroine is a Jew named Rebecca, namesake of Rebecca Gratz, the daughter of a Philadelphia Jewish merchant Scott knew well.

The point to be understood about these early developments in the U.S. is twofold. First, the British had to create the conditions for imposing upon American Jews the belief that the American notion of progress and assimilation could not be allowed to occur. Therefore the need for a “separate” Jewish organization based on the mythos of Zion, on the return to the “promised land of Palestine,” had to be infused into American Jewish thinking as the only chance Jews had for true salvation. The earlier Hofjuden were not doctrinally equipped to serve British design in this fashion. Second, and particularly important for today, was the need to replicate the same servile dependency outlook among American Jews that the Montefiores, Sebags, and the like had for their British lords. The Jewish benevolent societies created in the U.S. were to serve as indoctrination centers for inculcating this outlook among the Jewish immigrants newly arrived from Germany and Poland, Jews who had fled the ghettos and pogroms of Europe.

By 1801, in keeping with the need to train both a religious and political-financial leadership among Jews in the U.S., the “Grand Council of the Princes of Jerusalem of the Mother Supreme Council of the Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry” conferred an official charter upon the former Dutch West Indies Jewish merchants of Charleston, South Carolina — Da Costa, Cohen, Israel de Lieben, Dr. Isaac Held, Moses Levi, John Mitchell, and Frederick Dalacho — the men who had established a foothold in America for Britain’s “Jewish idea” through the Hebrew Benevolent and Orphan Aid Societies.

The task assigned these American Jews was not an easy one, however. Intense animosity between these “established Jews” and the new Jewish immigrants from Germany, Bavaria, and Poland prevented any coherent organization from coming into existence. Moreover, the immigrant Jews recognized in the American republic and the promise of assimilation the potential for far more advanced levels of technological, scientific and cultural achievement than anything even conceivable in the ghettos of Europe. Commitment to generalized scientific and technological progress ran very high in the Jewish immigrant community.

Therefore, a new program had to be developed to subvert that commitment and to bring leading American Jews into line with Britain’s schemes.

B’nai B’rith’s Organized Treason

“Glance at the attitude of England toward the United States. We see there are two well-defined parties, neither of them friendly to us as a nation; one the cotton interest siding with the South, and the other, the abolition coteries siding with the North, and so England, balancing herself adroitly between these two parties …. can give aid … to one section or to the other or both, to prevent conciliation, as best may service the political purpose of England, the Permanent Division of the United States.”

With these words, penned in 1860, the famous inventor Samuel Morse, an American counterintelligence officer, summarized his findings in connection with a vast British espionage network operating in the United States by the time of the Civil War. At the center of the network was B’nai B’rith.

As Morse says, the network included the Southern secessionists, and also the so-called Abolitionists. It also included American Heresy Jesuits, whose political descendants operate out of Georgetown University today. It included most of the leading figures in the Democratic Party, and a boatload of others. But the Zionist “Order of the Covenant,” popularly known as B’nai B’rith, squatted at the center.

At the time Morse wrote, the B’nai B’rith was a British intelligence cult dedicated to the destruction of the American Republic. It was an arm of British intelligence with that chartered purpose at the time of its founding in 1843, and remains so to this day.

The founder of B’nai B’rith, contrary to official histories, was Henry Lord Palmerston, then British Foreign Minister, who simultaneously created the entire international Zionist movement, in the period of 1843-1860. Zionism was only one of tens of cults created under Palmerston, some “Jewish” and some “Christian” in name, and spread across Europe and America as subversive arms of the British Empire. Each cult was modeled on the Ashmolean Scottish Rite of Freemasonry — of which Palmerston was Grand Master — itself modeled on Ptolemaic Egypt’s death cult of Isis. B’nai B’rith emerged in 1842 as the American extension of the “Jewish” Rite of Freemasonry in America.

According to the history of B’nai B’rith by Edward Grusd, “the mastermind” behind the early growth of this Jewish Masonic order was Baruch Rothschild, relative of the original Meyer Amshel Rothschild who founded the family banking dynasty in 18th century Germany. Rothschild was sent into the B’nai B’rith shortly after its founding to launch a ”membership drive” because, as he himself put it, “the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities.” In short, B’nai B’rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild’s building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic.

The impetus which got B’nai B’rith and other, interfacing British networks off the ground in the United States was provided by the “Oxford Movement,” a groundswell of evangelical religious reform fever organized in the 1820s by the Anglican Church itself, Kings College of London University, and Oxford University, home of British intelligence. The religion the “Oxford Movement” espoused under the leadership of John Newman, and E.G. Pusey, Regius professor of Hebrew at Oxford, was neither Christian nor Jewish, but a simple revitalization of the old Ashmolean cult of Isis-Osiris-Dionysus, whose spiritual leaders were actually Palmerston and the Scottish Masons.

The “Oxford Movement” was deployed as a cult-creating force internationally. Into the United States, in conjunction with Hapsburg-Holy Alliance forces on the continent, Newman and Pusey sent the “American Heresy” Jesuits, “Christians who are not Christians,” who still operate on behalf of the British monarchy out of Georgetown. The second phase of the Oxford deployment, slightly later, would be B’nai B’rith, “Jews who are not Jews.”

The Jesuits launched an organizing drive among Irish Catholic immigrants, welding this mass into a base of support for Andrew Jackson’s ascension to the Presidency. Jackson, controlled by British agent Martin van Buren, subsequently destroyed the backbone of American economic development with his destruction of the Bank of the United States. The Jesuits also set up a vast spy apparatus called the St. Leopold Foundation, based in Baltimore, Maryland, the city that would also be the “Cradle of American Zionism.” The principal product of the seminaries and schools operated by the St. Leopold Foundation was assassination and other dirty work. The inner circle of figures involved in the Lincoln assassination, including John Wilkes Booth, were in the main trained by these Jesuits.

Samuel Morse, who was part of the overall U.S. political intelligence service numbering Edgar Allen Poe, Winfield Scott, and Washington Irving among its active agents, exposed the Scottish-Hapsburg Rite deployment of Jesuits to America with his pamphlet, “Foreign Conspiracy Against Liberties of the United States.” At approximately the same time, “Oxford Movement” leader John Newman proposed to the Anglican Church that it create a Jesuitical order of its own, so impressed was he with the work of the order in America.

During the same period of Jesuit activity, the Scottish Rite circles in England sent agents to organize an “anti-Catholic” ferment in the United States, producing mass anti-Catholic riots under the banner of the “Order of Native Americans,” and the “Order of the Star-Spangled Banner.” These operations later fused under one umbrella, the ritualized political organization known as the “Know Nothings.” Under the American Party banner, this British-controlled agency ran presidential candidates which played a determining role in the outcome of the Pierce (1852) and Buchanan (1856) presidential elections. Both Pierce and Buchanan were pro-British.

The same period of pre-Civil War subversion saw British promotion and manipulation of both Abolitionists and Secessionists, in a manner exposed by Morse in his 1860 pamphlet, “The Present Attempt to Dissolve the American Union, a British Aristocratic Plot.” Morse told his readers of a conversation between the Earl of Shaftesbury, and a Dr. Cheevcr. who ran the Abolitionist-Secessionist scenario from England. Shaftesbury said ” I, in common with almost every English statesman, sincerely desire the rupture of the American Union. Morse, writing in mock reply, said, ‘True words, my lord, you have epitomized with great precision and conciseness the inner political workings of the British aristocratic mind for many long years.”

Each of the above cited operations by the British actively involved the networks of B’nai B’rith. Evidence of the interface that existed between Jesuit and Zionist is had in the authoritative report that it was Judah Benjamin, a secret controller of B’nai B’rith, who gave the directive for Lincoln’s assassination to networks of the St. Leopold Foundation. Similar connections existed between Zionists and Abolitionists. When Moses Wiesenfeld, business partner of Aaron Friedenwald, the prominent Baltimore Zionist traitor, was arrested and convicted of maintaining Confederate war materiel in his factory, he was defended by Johns Hopkins, the leading Quaker “abolitionist.”

WHO WERE THE TRAITORS?

The British-Scottish Rite intelligence agents who played the most prominent role in the subversion of the American Republic before, during, and after the Civil War were Judah P. Benjamin, Benjamin Peixotto, Albert Pike, and August Belmont. Peixotto, was a President of B’nai B’rith; Albert Pike, a Confederate General, was a Grand Master of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America. Their superiors were Lincoln-assassin Benjamin and August Belmont, Lord Rothschild’s personal agent in the United States.

August Belmont made his inauspicious arrival in the United States in 1832, a decade before B’nai B’rith’s founding. Of Jewish extraction, he later “converted” to Christianity by marriage into the Perry family, and was never officially a member of B’nai B’rith. The same story of “conversion” applies to Judah Benjamin. Belmont and Benjamin’s long and close association with the Zionist leadership, however, is a matter of public record, and might be compared to the relationship of Henry Kissinger and the Zionist Lobby today. Belmont, Rothschild’s official financial representative in New York, was a British puppet, like each leader of B’nai B’rith.

Belmont, whose activity as a British agent was most notoriously conducted through the leadership role he played in the Democratic Party, (double-crossing and bribing his way into the chairmanship 1856-76) depended on the B’nai B’rith leadership in almost every dirty operation he carried out. An exemplary instance was the Belmont project to create an ultra-revolutionary pseudo-Republican “youth cult” formation within the Democratic Party.

The “youth cult” project was a British design which went far beyond America. Its architect was British Colonial Secretary Edward Bulwer-Lytton, a builder of the British opium empire with Palmerston, a leading Knight of St. John of Jerusalem, and a man whose writings did most to promote the revival of Isis-worship internationally. In England, Lord Lytton’s disciple, Benjamin Disraeli, founded the feudalist-romantic Young Englander movement. Similar movements were created by British intelligence in virtually every European country — Young Italy, Young Turkey, Young Russia, and so forth — an international terrorist network at the disposal of the British Empire.

In 1845, at the direction of August Belmont, a pamphlet appeared in the United States called “The Position and Duties of Young America.” The pamphlet had been copied in outline from a tract by Young Germany British agent Arnold Ruge. The American author was a powerful man in B’nai B’rith, Edwin deLeon.

As early as 1515, the Portuguese marrano deLeons were active in the slave trade for New World plantations. They later settled in Charleston, which many marranos preferred because its “liberal” state constitution permitted them not merely to trade in black flesh, but to own slaves and plantations themselves. Every member of the deLeon family was a traitor during the Civil War. David deLeon took command of the Confederate Army medical corps. Edwin deLeon, author of Belmont’s “Young America” pamphlet and later Consul General to Egypt under the pro-slavery President Franklin Pierce, was sent to Europe by Judah Benjamin on behalf of Jefferson Davis’s Confederate Government to meet with Lord Palmerston to raise funds for the Confederacy. The deLeon family’s slave-trade partner, Seixas, published a poem in the South Carolina Gazette that fervently extolled the joys of slave trading.

Edwin deLeon, whose appointment as Confederate Commissioner in Europe came from B’nai B’rith controller Judah Benjamin, joined with George Sanders, a Belmont man and former employee of the Bank of England, to form the youth cult within the Democratic Party, appropriately called Young America. The movement had a threefold program, published in a journal, also called ‘Young America,” run by “Abolitionist” Ralph Waldo Emerson:

— Reciprocal Free Trade

— Special cooperation with European (British-run) republican movements

— Ally with Great Britain against Russia and Austria British formation of these “youth cults” in cooperation with Zionists internationally was merely a prelude to the formation of an international assassination bureau at the disposal of the high priests of the Scottish Rite. In 1853, Franklin Pierce appointed George Sanders to be U.S. Consul in Liverpool, England; August Belmont became Ambassador to Holland, Belmont’s James Buchanan became U.S. Ambassador to England, and Senator Pierre Soule, owned by Judah Benjamin, became U.S. Ambassador to Spain.

In June, 1853, the high priests themselves, Lord Palmerston, the Earl of Shaftesbury, and Lord Russell, brought Sanders, Belmont, Buchanan, and Soule together at a series of meetings in London with Mazzini, Garibaldi, and Orsini of Young Italy; Arnold Ruge of Young Germany, Alexander Herzen of Young Russia, and Kossuth of Young Hungary. Out of this meeting came the international assassination bureau of the Scottish Rite-Order of Zion, whose first target was Louis Napoleon of France. A later target was Abraham Lincoln, first in 1861 in Baltimore, B’nai B’rith stronghold, and then, the fatal 1865 “hit” in Washington.

Samuel Morse, in works cited, labelled the American Civil War a “British Aristocratic Plot.” The vehicle selected by Palmerston, Russell, Shaftesbury et al. for their long-planned rupture of the American Union was a secret society, the Knights of the Golden Circle. It was in the main composed of the leadership of the Scotch Rite Freemasons in America and the leaders and controllers of B’nai B’rith: Judah Benjamin, Benjamin Peixotto, August Belmont, Albert Pike, Jefferson Davis, George Sanders, and others.

The Knights of the Golden Circle emerged out of the Nullification Crisis of 1828-32, when South Carolina set a precedent for sectional strife by attempting to secede from the Union over the tariff issue — the state was controlled by deLeon-striped Zionist slave-traders who controlled B’nai B’rith. In the 1840s, the Knights of the Golden Circle arranged — through Knight General William Walker, with Albert Pike serving under him — the U.S. military expedition into Mexico (something not ordered by the President), and related attacks on Cuba and Central America whose open object was the seizure of new slave-territory, fanning tensions between North and South which “Abolitionists” made the most of.

Subsequently, as the crisis they were building reached a head with Lincoln’s election and the waves of secession by Southern states, the Knights of the Golden Circle attempted a coup d’etat against Lincoln’s government immediately upon his inauguration. Involved directly were Judah Benjamin, Grand Master Mason Robert Toombs, Scottish Rite Commander Albert Pike, and the leading Zionist banking houses in Baltimore and New York, led by the Seligmans. The Seligmans financed all of the B’nai B’rith’s New York front organizations for the assimilation and indoctrination of immigrant Jews (“The German- Hebrew Literary Society” and so forth). The coup would have involved seizure of the capital city’s railroads, the Treasury and other strategic points, an assassination of Lincoln en route to the Baltimore stronghold of B’nai B’rith and the Jesuits, and the installation of John Breckenridge, secretly a Knight. The object of the coup was to ensure that the Civil War, already inevitable, would be fought out in the North, ravaging American industry in the British interest. The coup had been well planned, and only General Beauregard’s premature firing on Fort Sumter gave Lincoln and General Winfield Scott the warning they needed to crush the coup.

Immediately, the B’nai B’rith leaders in the Knights assumed leading positions in the Confederacy, with notably Judah P. Benjamin becoming first Attorney General and then Secretary of War under Knight-President Jefferson Davis. Benjamin subsequently became Secretary of State, assuming control of the espionage service of the Confederate States. Coordinating with Benjamin’s office was a “Secret Cabinet” located in British Canada, which helped run the Copperhead draft resisters’ operation in the north, created by August Belmont, and employing the talents of George Sanders among others. Among the spies in the North directly controlled by Benjamin and the Canadian “Secret Cabinet” was John Wilkes Booth. Also at Judah Benjamin’s disposal throughout the Civil War was every branch of B’nai B’rith.

B’nai B’rith’s networks consisted of those synagogues and Jewish welfare organizations established by Zionist slave-traders in the first half of the century. Their deployment was open and loud from the first days of the Secession Crisis. During the peak of the crisis in 1861, “Covenant” Rabbi Morris Raphall of New York City gave a sermon on the “Bible View of Slavery,” justifying every hideous aspect of the previous 300 years’ Zionist fortune-making off black flesh. His sermon was widely praised in synagogues controlled by B’nai B’rith everywhere.

The Baltimore Hebrew Congregation, established in 1830, received its funding monies from the Dutch banking family of Judah Benjamin. Among its members were the treacherous Friedenwalds. Rabbi Bernard Illomay, in support of Raphall, addressed the congregation on Lincoln’s government: “Who can blame our brethren of the South for their being inclined to secede from a society under whose government their ends cannot be attained and whose union is kept together by heavy iron ties of violence and arbitrary force? Who can blame our brethren of the South for seceding from a society whose government cannot or will not protect the property rights (read: slaves) and privileges of a great portion of the union?” Slavery, said Illomay, is “divinely ordained.”

Baltimore, a strategically placed port city and transportation center, was a key to the B’nai B’rith-Knights of the Golden Circle’s attempted coup against Lincoln, and the Confederacy’s broader strategy throughout the Civil War. In this city, the Zionists of the “Covenant” and other British agencies planned chaos. In April, 1861, rioting broke out between Union soldiers attempting to reach Washington to crush the Golden Circle coup and mobs led by members of B’nai B’rith, Young Italy, and the Jesuits. Persons opposing the mob “were molested; some were beaten and killed” including one Union soldier, according to eyewitnesses. Printing presses, including those which printed the “Sinai” newsletter of Rabbi David Einhorn, an anti-Zionist Jew who denounced slavery, were destroyed. Homes were set afire; train tracks entering the city were destroyed. One of the individuals arrested was Joseph Friedenwald, sire of a leading Zionist family in Baltimore. Opposition to B’nai B’rith within the Jewish Community was crushed. Rabbi David Einhorn was run out of town and to this day, he is slandered by B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation League spokesman as “merely an abolitionist.”

Not only in Baltimore, but throughout the border state area and South, B’nai B’rith lodges were functioning as “safehouses” and centers for espionage operations directed by Judah Benjamin. It was this that prompted General Ulysses Grant, late in the war, to issue a directive that all Jews from Tennessee to Mississippi were to be arrested for espionage. Those B’nai B’rith officials and others subsequently put on trial for espionage were defended by lawyer Simon Wolf. Grant then ordered Simon Wolf himself arrested. Wolf’s release was secured by the traitor Edwin Stanton, Lincoln’s Secretary of War. Wolf went on to become the President of B’nai B’rith some years later.

B’NAI B’RITH’S KKK

Eight months after Lincoln’s assassination in 1865, Judah Benjamin and Albert Pike created the Invisible Empire of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan out of what remained salvageable from the Knights of the Golden Circle. Aiding them in this project, and a Klan leader, was a Charleston South Carolina Zionist named Baruch, Bernard Baruch’s grandfather. Judah Benjamin contributed some funds for the funding of the KKK, but the bulk of the financing was handled by the southern branches of B’nai B’rith. The various Klans in the United States are controlled by the Anti-Defamation League and related Zionist organizations to the present day.

Benjamin and George Sanders subsequently fled to the safety of England, with Pike remaining to run the Klan operation in the South. The operation was modelled on the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, with all the rituals attending thereto. Pike had been one of the intellectual guides of the order, and had written extensively on the subject of mysticism and the ancient cults, including books: “The Christian Mysteries,” “Gnosticism, the Kabala and the Mysteries of Masonry,” and “Zoroaster of Sarathrustra and His Doctrines.” Pike described his (and B’nai B’rith’s) worship of the goddess Isis, as follows:

“It began to shape my intellectual vision,” wrote Pike in reference to the Scottish Rite, “into something imposing and majestic … It seems to me like the pyramids in the grandeur and loneliness whose yet undiscovered chambers of generations of the sacred books of the Egyptians (are) … so long lost to the world; in its symbolisms which are its spirit of brotherhood and its essence, Freemasonry is more ancient than all of the world’s living religions.”

Another famous quote of Pike’s was, “Masonry says, ‘Be content, compare not your condition with the few above you … that he hath not the wealth of Rothschild’ …”

After the Civil War, Benjamin Peixotto, the former B’nai B’rith president, secured an appointment as U.S. consul to Romania, through the intervention of German-born Carl Schurz, a long-time British intelligence agent. As an advisor Peixotto took along Simon Wolfe, also a B’nai B’rith president. The appointment had been an aim of the Rothschilds and Montefiores in London. In Romania, Peixotto created the infamous Order of Zion, which worked to destroy the Russian-U.S. entente that had helped save Lincoln’s Union from British intervention during the Civil War.

Sidebar

The Platform of Zionism’s Humanist Enemy

In 1861 Rabbi David Einhorn was driven out of Baltimore for his attacks on the proslavery Zionists who (as today) ran the city. Reprinted here is the text of his “Pittsburgh Platform,” as adopted by the Central Conference of Reformed Rabbis in 1889. Ninety years later, it still embodies the ecumenical qualities of humanist Judaism.

IN ACCORD WITH REASON

First — We recognize in every religion an attempt to grasp the infinite, and in every mode, source, or book or revelation held sacred in any religious system, the consciousness of the indwelling of God in man. We hold that Judaism presents the highest conception of the God idea as taught in our Holy Scriptures and developed and spiritualized by the Jewish teachers, in accordance with the moral and philosophical progress of their respective ages. We maintain that Judaism preserved and defended, midst continual struggles and trials and under enforced isolation, this God idea as the central religious truth for the human race.

Second — We recognize in the Bible the record of the consecration of the Jewish people to its mission as priest of the one God, and value it as the most potent instrument of religious and moral instruction. We hold that modern discoveries of scientific researches in the domains of nature and history are not antagonistic to the doctrines of Judaism, the Bible reflecting the primitive ideas of its own age, and at times clothing its conception of divine providence and justice, dealing with man in miraculous narratives.

Third — We recognize in the Mosaic legislation a system of training the Jewish people for its mission during its national life in Palestine, and today we accept as binding only the moral laws, and maintain only such ceremonies as elevate and sanctify our lives, but reject all such as are not adapted to the views and habits of modern civilization.

Fourth — We hold that all such Mosaic and rabbinical laws as regulate diet, priestly purity, and dress, originated in ages and under the influence of ideas altogether foreign to our present mental and spiritual state. They fail to impress the modern Jew with a spirit of priestly holiness; their observance in our days is apt to rather obstruct than to further modern spiritual elevation.

Fifth — We recognize, in the modern era of universal culture of heart and intellect, the approaching of the realization of Israel’s great messianic hope for the establishment of the kingdom of truth, justice, and peace among all men. We consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community, and therefore expect neither a return to Palestine, nor a sacrificial worship under the sons of Aaron, nor the restoration of any laws concerning the Jewish state.

Sixth — We recognize in Judaism a progressive religion, ever striving to be in accord with the postulates of Reason. We are convinced of the utmost necessity of preserving the historical identity with our great past. Christianity and Islam being daughter religions of Judaism, we appreciate their providential mission to aid in the spreading of monotheistic and moral truth. We acknowledge that the spirit of broad humanity of our age is our ally in the fulfillment of our mission, and therefore we extend the hand of fellowship to all who operate with us in the establishment of the reign of truth and righteousness among men.

Seventh — We assert the doctrine of Judaism, that the soul of man is immortal, grounding this belief on the divine nature of the human spirit, which forever finds bliss in righteousness and misery in wickedness. We reject as ideas not rooted in Judaism the beliefs both in bodily resurrection and in Gehenna and Eden (Hell and Paradise) as abodes for everlasting punishment or reward.

Eighth — In full accordance with the spirit of the Mosaic legislation, which strives to regulate the relation between rich and poor, we deem it our duty to participate in the great task of modern times, to solve on the basis of justice and righteousness, the problems presented by the contrasts and evils of the present organization of society.

Notes

Rev A: Changed nonbreaking spaces to regular spaces to prevent premature line breaks

Fair Usage Law

November 23, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

39 Congressmen advocating for release of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard

39 Congressmen advocating for release of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard
Jump to Comments

ACTION ALERT

AMP urges supporters to take action and denounce latest Israel-first policies

(CHICAGO 11/22/2010) – Thirty-nine Democratic U.S. Representatives have signed a letter asking President Barak Obama to grant clemency to convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. The elected officials are working in tandem with several Zionist and religious Jewish organizations, including the Zionist Organization of America, Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, B’nai B’rith International, and the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.

The American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) urges its supporters to take action and call on the congressmen to uphold America’s interest and stop these Israel-first policies. Freeing Pollard is unpatriotic and harms America’s long-standing interests.

Pollard was sentenced to life in prison in 1986, after he confessed to spying for the state of Israel. Pollard, who was a civilian research analyst with high security clearance for the U.S. Navy, had agreed to spy for Israel for 10 years in exchange for more than $500,000. According to a January 1999 article in the New Yorker by Seymour Hersh, Pollard “betrayed elements of four major American intelligence systems.” Pollard caused extensive damage to U.S. intelligence and U.S. national security because of the nature of the highly sensitive documents he sold to Israel.

In many cases, Israel bartered top-secret U.S. intelligence documents it received from Pollard with the Soviet Union, in exchange for Soviet Jewish colonial emigration to historic Palestine, Hersh wrote.

Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has hinted at Israeli concessions in the stalled peace talks if Pollard is released, according to the Jerusalem Post. This is not the first time he has used the American Jewish traitor as a bargaining chip in Middle East peace negotiations. As prime minister in October 1998, Netanyahu also tried to gain Pollard’s release in exchange for concessions during the Wye River, Maryland, talks with then-President Bill Clinton.

The American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) is outraged that 39 U.S. representatives care more about the state of Israel than they do for American security. It is time for our elected officials to put U.S. interests ahead of Israel’s.

TAKE ACTION

Below is the letter, initiated by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-MA, to President Barack Obama as well as the names of the 39 representatives who have put Israel’s interest ahead of America’s by signing the letter.

* AMP urges you to contact the signatories to say that their support of someone who has done incalculable damage to the security of the United States is reprehensible and unacceptable.
* If your representative did not sign the letter, please write and thank him or her. AMP also asks you to urge them to resist pressure from their Israel-first colleagues.
* Write a letter to President Obama to express your disapproval of this letter and to stress that Americans deserve and demand that U.S. policymakers put our interests ahead of a foreign country’s.

November 18, 2010

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

We write to urge you to use your constitutional power to extend clemency to Jonathan Pollard, thereby releasing him from prison after the time he has already served. Mr. Pollard committed serious crimes and he has expressed remorse. Such an exercise of the clemency power would not in any way imply doubt about his guilt, nor cast any aspersions on the process by which he was convicted. Those who have such views are of course entitled to continue to have them, but the clemency grant has nothing to do with that.

We believe that there has been a great disparity from the standpoint of justice between the amount of time Mr. Pollard has served and the time that has been served — or not served at all — by many others who were found guilty of similar activity on behalf of nations that, like Israel, are not adversarial to us. It is indisputable in our view that the nearly twenty-five years that Mr. Pollard has served stands as a sufficient time from the standpoint of either punishment or deterrence.

In summary, we see clemency for Mr. Pollard as an act of compassion justified by the way others have been treated by our justice system. We urge you to use the clemency power in this case.

Sincerely,

Barney Frank (D-MA)

Gary L. Ackerman (D-NY)

Robert E. Andrews (D-NJ)

Shelley Berkley (D-NV)

Robert A. Brady (D-PA)

Danny Davis (D-IL)

Theodore E. Deutsch (D-FL)

Eliot L. Engel (D-NY)

John J. Hall (D-NY)

James A. Himes (D-CT)

Maurice D. Hinchey (D-NY)

Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX)

Patrick J. Kennedy (D-RI)

John Lewis (D-GA)

Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY)

Michael E. McMahon (D-NY)

Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY)

Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)

Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)

John W. Olver (D-MA)

Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ)

Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-NJ)

Donald M. Payne (D-NJ)

Charles B. Rangel (D-NY)

Laura Richardson (D-CA)

Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL)

Robert C. “Bobby” Scott (D-VA)

Brad Sherman (D-CA)

Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS)

Edolphus Towns (D-NY)

Niki Tsongas (D-MA)

Henry A. Waxman (D-CA)

Anthony Weiner (D-NY)

To find the addresses and phone numbers of elected officials, click here.

To send an email to President Obama, click here.

For more background information on Jonathan Pollard, go to these resources:

Jerusalem Post, Nov. 19, 2010.

Seymour M. Hersh, Annals of Espionage, “The Traitor,” The New Yorker, January 18, 1999, p. 26 ($5.99 fee)

Ian Williams, “A Tale of Two Spies,” July/August 1993 Washington Report, p. 13.

The American Muslims for Palestine is a national, grassroots organization, whose mission is to educate the American public about issues relating to Palestine and its rich, cultural heritage. For more information, go to www.ampalestine.org, call 888.404.4AMP begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              888.404.4AMP      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, or email info@ampalestine.org.

Fair Usage Law

November 22, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed

The Samson Option explodes one of the world’s most closely guarded secrets—the secret of Israel’s atomic arsenal.

http://www.archive.org/details/Sampson_Option

The Samson Option explodes one of the world’s most closely guarded secrets—the secret of Israel’s atomic arsenal. It relates, for the first time, the political, diplomatic, and military repercussions that have for decades been concealed from the world.

It is also about America’s ability not to see what it does not want to see. All American presidents since John F. Kennedy have turned a blind eye toward Israel’s growing nuclear capacity while paying lip service to the goal of nuclear nonproliferation.

In The Samson Option, Seymour M. Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize-winner who wrote the first account of the My Lai massacre in South Vietnam, reveals one of the classic clandestine operations of our time: Israel’s spectacular underground nuclear facility in the Negev Desert, where its technicians and scientists began manufacturing nuclear warheads in the late 1960s. It describes the bitter infighting within the Israeli government over the bomb and its huge cost. It tells how the money for me nuclear program was raised abroad, and how the early technology was acquired with the aid of France. And it shows how and when Israel threatened to use its nuclear power.

The Samson Option reveals many startling events that played a secret and significant role in the history of our times from the early 1960s through the Gulf War:

• How, in the late 1970s, Israel not only stole reconnaissance intelligence from our most secret of satellites, the KH-11, but used that data to help target the Soviet Union;

• How Jonathan Pollard, the American spy now serving a life sentence in jail, was a key figure in Israel’s nuclear program (and how some of Pollard’s intelligence was turned over to the Soviet Union at the express direction of Yitzhak Shamir, the Israeli prime minister);

• How Israel created a false control room at the nuclear reactor at Dimona to give U.S. inspectors the false impression that the facility was solely for research;

• How the Eisenhower administration made a concerted last-ditch effort in December 1960 to force Israel to acknowledge its nuclear ambitions—and failed;

• How Israel threatened Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon with the use of nuclear weapons on the third day of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, successfully blackmailing the White House to airlift much needed supplies;

• How South Africa cooperated with Israel to create a mysterious 1979 “flash” in the South Atlantic, actually a test of an Israeli-South African nuclear artillery shell;

• How Israel used a top London newspaper editor to help catch Mordecai Vanunu, its nuclear traitor;

• How a prominent American Jewish Democratic party fund-raiser also raised money for the Israeli bomb—and was able to intervene repeatedly at the White House; and

• How the American intelligence community was finally able to learn what Israel was doing at Dimona—though it was understood that no one’s career would be enhanced by providing such intelligence to the White House.

The Samson Option is ultimately a narrative of how the bomb influenced the diplomatic relations between Israel and America far more than was seen or understood by the press and the public. It shows that, in every sense, Israel was born a nuclear power. Since its founding, some of its leaders, including David Ben-Gurion and Ernst David Bergmann—the little-known scientist who was the father of the Israeli bomb—were determined that no future enemy would be able to carry out another Holocaust. Just as Samson brought down the temple and killed himself along with his enemies, so would Israel destroy those who sought its destruction.

The message of The Samson Option is stark: The next Middle East war might very well be nuclear.

http://www.archive.org/details/Sampson_Option

Fair Usage Law

November 19, 2010   Posted in: AIPAC, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, Gaza, Golan Heights, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Vanessa Hudgens Not Converting to Judaism for Zac Efron

Vanessa Hudgens is not converting to Judaism to win over the mother and father of boyfriend Zac Efron. A representative for the Blondie of “Sucker Punch” has denied the claim she is hoping to “score point” with the “Charlie St.

Full Story and Source…

Vanessa Hudgens Not Converting to Judaism for Zac Efron
Thu, 21 October 2010 03:13:48 ET
Share

Vanessa Hudgens Not Converting to Judaism for Zac Efron

© AXELLE WOUSSEN/Bauer-Griffin
Shooting down the rumor the ‘Sucker Punch’ star is hoping to ‘score point’ with her actor boyfriend’s Jewish family, her representative insists that the converting to Judaism claim is ‘not true’.
Vanessa Hudgens is not converting to Judaism to win over the mother and father of boyfriend Zac Efron. A representative for the Blondie of “Sucker Punch” has denied the claim she is hoping to “score point” with the “Charlie St. Cloud” actor’s family with the conversion, telling Gossip Cop the story holds no truth.

Bringing up the conversion to Judaism story in the first place was the National Enquirer. The tabloid recently suggested that the 21-year-old actress, who starred alongside Zac on the “High School Musical” series, is “willing to do whatever it takes to become Mrs. Zac Efron”, including converting to Judaism. It was said that Zac is “flattered” by the fact that his girlfriend would make such a commitment, and knows that “Vanessa is dead serious about making a life with him.”

Vanessa and Zac began dating when they filmed “High School Musical” together. In a previous interview, she admitted that she loves the Tobacco Vanille scent on her man. While revealing she never picks out cologne for him, Vanessa told Hollywood Life, “One that I think is amazing for either sex is Tom Ford Tobacco Vanille. It’s really interesting.”

© Celebrity-Mania.com

See the original post here:
Vanessa Hudgens Not Converting to Judaism for Zac Efron

Fair Usage Law

October 21, 2010   Posted in: Judaism  Comments Closed

O, Palestine! – Grendel Report

Concern for Palestine among a few Arab intellectuals, as Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi shows in his book on the subject, did not exist until Zionists began settlements at the turn of the century.

October 6, 2010
O, Palestine!

September 01, 2010
O, Palestine!

By Moshe Dann

The notion of a Palestinian people and Palestinian identity, although taken for granted today, has neither a long nor a distinguished history. Understanding its origins and what it represents explains why the peace process between Israel and the Arabs has failed and will continue to fail.

Inherent in Palestinianism, from its origins, is the rejection of a Jewish state in any form. That opposition is not negotiable and not open to compromise; it is essential.

Palestinianism was never for anything; its raison d’être was to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state. That purpose has never changed.

Concern for Palestine among a few Arab intellectuals, as Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi shows in his book on the subject, did not exist until Zionists began settlements at the turn of the century. Most weekly newspapers from that period which he surveyed were not even from Palestine and had scant distribution.

“Palestinian identity” then, as now, was negative, focused entirely on opposition to Zionists rather than a positive self-definition. Arab Palestinian leaders, like the mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husayni, an ardent supporter of the Nazis, and arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat — both “fathers” of Palestinianism ignored by Khalidi — rejected Zionism and promoted terrorism.

Local Arab uprisings against British rule were anti-colonial and anti-Zionist, not directed toward another independent Palestinian state. Arab riots and pogroms, like those in 1929 and 1936, for example, were not motivated by Palestinian nationalism; there were no calls for a Palestinian state. The battle cry was, “Kill the Jews.”

In 1937, Arab leader Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission, “There is no such country as ‘Palestine’; ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented!”

The riots of 1936 were whipped up by the newly created “Arab [not Palestinian] Higher Committee,” the central political organ of the Arab community of Mandate Palestine, organized by a group of elites led by Amin al-Husayni. In 1948, the Arab League organized the All-Palestine Government, the first attempt to establish an independent Palestinian state. Led by King Abdullah of Jordan and nominally Amin al-Husayni, who had returned from Berlin, where he spent the war, it called for the union of Arab Palestine and Transjordan. Husayni later arranged Abdullah’s assassination.

A Palestinian National Council convened in Gaza in 1948, under Amin al-Husayni’s leadership, passed resolutions calling for an independent state over all of Palestine, with Jerusalem as its capital. Adopting the flag of the Arab Revolt that had been used by Arab nationalists, it called for the liberation of Palestine. But it had no following.

In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that “there is no such thing as Palestine in history.” In 1947, Arab leaders protesting the U.N. partition plan argued that Palestine was part of Syria and “politically, the Arabs of Palestine [were] not [an] independent[,] separate … political entity.”

In 1947, the U.N. proposed a “Jewish” State and an “Arab” — not Palestinian — State.

The womb of Palestinianism was war, the Nakba (catastrophe) in the Arab narrative, the establishment of the State of Israel. Five well-armed Arab countries invaded the nascent state, joining local Arab gangs and militias in a genocidal war to exterminate the Jews. Yet this was not seen as a war for Palestinian nationalism, or Palestinianism; it was an all-out Arab war against Jews, Zionism, and Zionists.

Arab gangs that attacked Jews in 1948, composed of locals and Arabs from the region, were called the “Arab — not Palestininian — Army of Liberation.” The reason is that prior to Israel’s establishment, the notion of a “Palestinian people” simply did not exist, or was irrelevant, because Arab affiliations are primarily familial and tribal — not national. And because “Palestinian” then meant something else.

Before 1948, those who were called (and called themselves) “Palestinians” were Jews, not Arabs, although both carried the same British passports. In fact, only after Jews in Palestine called themselves Israelis, in 1948, could Arabs adopt “Palestinian,” as theirs exclusively.

The idea of an “Arab Palestinian people” was formed and enshrined in UNRWA “refugee camps” — today, large, developed towns — where its residents are indoctrinated with hatred, the “right of return” to Israel, and Israel’s eventual destruction. Except in Jordan, which granted them citizenship, the residents of these UNRWA towns in Lebanon and Syria are severely restricted and denied basic human and civil rights.

UNRWA’s controversial definition of “Arab refugee” includes anyone who claimed residence in Palestine since 1946, regardless of origin; this date is important because it marks the high point of a massive influx of Arabs from the region into Palestine, primarily due to employment opportunities and a higher standard of living. This category of “refugees,” moreover, was different from all others in that it included not only those who applied in 1949, but all of their descendants, forever, with full rights and privileges. This is one of the core issues preventing any resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict. UNRWA’s existence, therefore, perpetuates the conflict, prevents Israel’s acceptance, and breeds violence and terrorism.

Ironically, only when Israel took control of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza could the residents of UNRWA towns in those areas move and work freely, obtain decent education and health care, and express a newly designed Palestinianism — albeit often dedicated to violence and Israel’s destruction.

With an annual budget of over a half-billion dollars, UNRWA supports about one-and-a-half million “refugees” in 58 “camps” and 5 million “registered refugees” (throughout the world) — who can claim their “rights” as “refugees” at any time. The total population is expected to reach 7 or 8 million next year, and it keeps growing.

Were it not for the policies of Arab countries and UNRWA, the “Arab refugees” might have followed the example of Jewish refugees who were expelled from Arab countries, came to Israel, and went on to live normal lives. Given the same chance, perhaps, Arab Palestinians might have established a state of their own. The desire to destroy Israel, however, trumps state-building, and it is fundamental to Palestinianism.

The first attempt to define Palestinianism was in 1964, in the PLO Covenant, during Jordan’s occupation of “the West Bank” (a Jordanian reference from 1950 to distinguish the area from the East Bank of the Jordan River) and when Egypt held the Gaza Strip. On behalf of the “Palestinian Arab people,” the Covenant declared their goal: a “holy war” (jihad) to “liberate Palestine,” i.e. destroy Israel. There was no mention of Arabs living in “the West Bank” and Gaza Strip, since that would have threatened Arab rulers. Arab “refugees” were convenient proxies in the war against Israel, not their hosts; Palestinianism became a replacement nationalism for Zionism, a call to arms against Jews.

This balancing act was no longer necessary after 1967, when Israel acquired areas that had been originally assigned to a Jewish State by the League of Nations and British Mandate — Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip — and the Golan Heights, all rich in Jewish history and archeology. A year later, the PLO Covenant was amended to cover both “occupations” — in 1948 and 1967.

Dedicated to armed struggle, their goal has never changed; unable to defeat Israel militarily, however, the Arab strategy is to demonize and delegitimize, creating yet another Arab Palestinian state in addition to Jordan. In order to accomplish this, they concocted a narrative, an identity, and an ethos to compete with Zionism and Jewish history: Palestinianism.

Presented in the PLO Covenant and Hamas Charter (1988), the purpose of Palestinianism is to “liberate Palestine” and destroy Israel; neither reflects any redeeming social or cultural values. Moreover, Palestinianism is moving towards Islamist extremism.

According to Palestinian Basic Law (Article 4), ratified by PA President Mohammed Abbas in 2005:

1. Islam is the official religion in Palestine. Respect for the sanctity of all other divine religions shall be maintained.

2. The principles of Islamic Shari’a shall be a principal source of legislation.

3. Arabic shall be the official language.

http://muqtafi.birzeit.edu/mainleg/14138.htm

“Palestinianism” lacks the basic requirements of legitimate national identity: a separate, unique linguistic, cultural, ethnic, or religious basis. It is nothing more than a political-military construct, currently led by Fatah and Hamas terrorist organizations. Yet it became legitimized by the U.N.

Despite PLO mega-terrorist attacks, and backed by the Arab League, Muslim and “non-aligned” countries, the PLO was accepted by the United Nations in 1974. The following year, the U.N. passed its infamous “Zionism is Racism” resolution, sanctioning Israel’s demonization and setting the U.N. on a course of Israel’s destruction.

The myth of Palestinianism worked because the media accepted Arab and PLO claims and their cause. Nearly all media, for example, use the term “Palestinian” or “Israeli-occupied West Bank,” reinforcing Palestinian claims, rather than the authentic designation which appears on earlier maps, Judea and Samaria, which refer to the regions’ Jewish history. The use of “West Bank” is a political, not a geographic statement.

Eventually, by the early 1990s, Palestinianism was accepted by some Israeli politicians, Left-dominated media, academia, cultural elite, and some jurists as a way of expressing their opposition to “settlements” and hoping for some sort of mutual recognition with the PLO. Their efforts culminated in the Oslo Accords (1993), which gave official Israeli sanction to Palestinianism.

Anti-Israel academics around the world promote “Palestinian” archeology, society, and culture as a brand name and a political message. Advertising works; every time someone uses the term “Palestinian,” it acknowledges and reinforces this myth.

Palestinianism, however, regardless of its lack of historical, cultural, and social roots, is now well-established and here to stay as a political identity that demands sovereign rights and a territorial base. The question seems to be not if, but where.

The solution is regional. Arab Palestinians are entitled to civil and human rights in their host countries, where they have lived for generations. A second Arab Palestinian state, in addition to Jordan, which was carved out of Palestine in 1921 — whose population is two-thirds “Palestinian” — will not resolve any core issues at the heart of the conflict. The conflict is not territorial, but existential; recognition of a Jewish state — i.e., Israel — is anathema to the Palestinian cause. That explains why Palestinian Arab leaders refuse to accept it in any form.

The problem for Palestinianism is not “the occupation” in 1967, but Israel’s existence; seen as an exclusively Arab homeland, Palestine is an integral part of the Arab world, completely under Arab sovereignty. This is axiomatic; there are no exceptions and no compromises.

Promoted in media, mosques, and schools, anti-Jewish incitement, denial of the Holocaust and Jewish history, and rejection of the right of Jewish national self-determination, by definition, Palestinianism is the greatest obstacle to peace.

The author is a writer and journalist living in Israel.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/o_palestine.html at October 06, 2010 – 05:27:16 PM CDT

More here:
O, Palestine! – Grendel Report

Fair Usage Law

October 6, 2010   Posted in: Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine  Comments Closed

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

If you want to know what really happened in the Leo Frank Case you can read the following books.

The best books on the subject –

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan, By Mary Phagan Kean
http://www.archive.org/details/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn1913

2. The Abridged Trial Testimony of the Leo Frank Murder Trial (1918)
http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankExtractFromAmericanStateTrialsVolumeX1918

3. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery 1913
http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankCasemaryPhaganInsideStoryOfGeorgiasGreatestMurder

And The man the Jews blame for causing Leo Frank to be Lynched, five works by Tom Watson.

Five Books on the Leo Frank Case by Tom Watson (MUST READ)

1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See

page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheLeoFrankCase

2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See

page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson,

Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheFullReviewOfTheLeoFrankCaseMarch1915

3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915)

Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo

Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheCelebratedCaseOfLeoFrank

4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915)

Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew

Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheOfficialRecordInTheCaseOfLeoFrankJewPervertSeptember1915

5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom

Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company,

Thomson, Ga.

http://www.archive.org/details/RichJewsIndictTheStateOfGeorgia

Fair Usage Law

August 13, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

Calling all Debunkers, and anyone who thinks Holocaust Denial is …

Discusion about Calling all Debunkers, and anyone who thinks Holocaust Denial is offensive, debunk this! in the AboveTopSecret.com website alternative topics discussion forum General Conspiracies.

Holocaust Denial Videos
9 hours of free web video about how the holocaust is a hoax.
Billy Wilder. His Secret Work On A Holocaust Myth Movie
The Wilder Memorandum. My favorite holocaust myth document

One Third of the Holocaust

Explains how Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were not death camps, thereby debunking 1/3 of the holocaust. Asks questions like, “Would the Germans have really put a fence made out of tree branches around a deathcamp?” Answer: “Uh, no, that’s silly.” Banned at Youtube. 30 episodes. 4 hours 15 min. Click the above image to view.

Buchenwald

The liberation of Buchenwald presented an opportunity for a Psyche Warfare operation meant to denazify the Germans via atrocity stories. But it ‘blew back’ into USA media which is why Americans remember growing up hearing stories of human skin lampshades. 22 episodes. 2 hours 22 min. Click the above image to view.

Phil Donahue Holocaust Denial

Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4

In 1994, two gas chamber deniers, Bradley Smith and David Cole went on a talk show. The maker of One Third Of The Holocaust points out witnesses’ lies, like where everyone (including a famous skeptic) believes an obviously fraudulent phone caller.

Auschwitz David Cole

Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3

The David Cole Video. A young Jewish holocaust denier, posing as a believer, puts some hard questions to the senior curator of the Auschwitz State Museum. After making this video, a “hit” was put out on Cole, and a reward for information on his whereabouts was issued by Irv Rubin (who years later, was arrested by the FBI for planning to kill a Lebanese-American Congressman.) Fearing assassination, Cole went into hiding. He never surfaced again publicly. (1992, 52 minutes)

Nazi Shrunken Heads

A Look At Lies Which Justify War.

Explains how media and politicians manipulate the masses to be pro-war by using myths. Discusses not only the holocaust myth, but also myths promoting Western aggression toward Africa and the Middle East. Makes the bold assertion that Idi Amin of Uganda was probably the victim of a Public Relations/Psyche Warfare campaign, and not someone who thought he was the “Last King of Scotland.” 25 minutes. Click above image to view.

Written Work:

Morgenthau Plan in the Holocaust Myth

Flyers (for you to send out)

Little Boy Photo Fraud

Thomas Blatt Sobibor Fraud

Manifesto

Donate

Blog

Stroop Report Forgery

Contact

Rebuttals and Censorship

Nazi Shrunken Heads Transcript

A great book on Treblinka

A great book on Belzec

CODOH.com

Robert Faurisson Interview

Konrad Morgen

Manifesto

I advocate kindness and good vibes toward all Jewish people. I like black people and people of all races, nationalities, religions; and I like gay people. It goes without saying but due to the stigma associated with holocaust denial, it needs to be said. I feel that it was Hitler’s belief in military solutions that was primarily responsible for the European disaster that was World War II. I just believe the holocaust is a hoax. Today it is the holocaust myth that props up militarism. Here’s why:

Of the many terrible things about World War II, the single worst thing wasn’t the holocaust, because that’s a myth. The worst thing was German soldiers fighting Soviet soldiers because millions of young men on both sides died horrible deaths. That war was started by Hitler and, rather than the crude concept of “fighting communism,” it galvanized Stalin’s power and made void the internal workings within the USSR that might have deposed him. The young men put between Stalin and Hitler and being conscripted to fight, was the worst thing about WWII. And the lesson from that is militarism and military solutions are always a disaster. That lesson is obscured when the worst thing about World War II is considered to be the holocaust because then the opposite conclusion is drawn: militarism seems good. Righteous militarism to defeat Hitler. Fighting intolerance. Americans largely see World War II as the “good fight” against Evil. The holocaust myth props up that assertion and obscures the truth: World War II was a European disaster.

The holocaust myth gives a “fighting for tolerance” theme to World War II, and the “fighting for tolerance” theme continues to justify military aggression up to recent times: it was used to justify the US invasion of Serbia/Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq. The wrong conclusions about World War II based on the false information that is the holocaust, reverberate into militaristic solutions creating disasters today.

Because the holocaust myth was never exposed, the masses never lost their gullibility and are easily manipulated for pro-war purposes. Here’s an example: before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, not only did most Americans believe Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, many also believed he had killed millions of his own people.

The good/evil narrative of WWII is a blur with the good/evil narrative of so many bad movies, t.v. shows, and reportage. Things become more and more like the movie Idiocracy, and fitting that the ending of that movie involves a dumbed-down explanation of World War II. In reality people aren’t really “evil” –there’s just the challenge of understanding why people do what they do. The holocaust myth holds up the conception of Evil itself.

Christianity is a proud and interesting cultural heritage. But as a present-day belief system it can hold people back intellectually and culturally. A fundamental of Christianity is it’s dumb portrayal of evil. But consider the possibility that a modern dumb portrayal of evil is the holocaust. So like Christianity, could the holocaust also hold people back intellectually and culturally? A fundamental of both being a worldview of good and evil? And could this hold society back, ping pong-ing, or reinforced with, media capitalism? We see news reporting and television shows, movies promoting righteous violence to take on “evil people.” On a global level the “evil people” are often resistant to capitalism like North Korea; or resistant to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians (Iraq, Taliban, Al-Qaeda) Again the movie Idiocracy comes to mind when it had a stadium sports-like media spectacle of the USA using overwhelming force on it’s enemies. The stadium spectators playing electric guitars while monster trucks ran over the enemies.

Not to mention that the false postulate that is the holocaust is the cornerstone of European Jewish colonialism in Israel and all the problems which have come from it. Iran’s Ahmadinejad is right about that. We have the horrible bookends of European Colonialism: European Christian colonialism (The Crusades) 850 years ago, and European Jewish colonialism (Zionism) from the early 1900’s till today. These bookends of colonialism had European laws associated with them: Heresy then, and denying the holocaust today. The laws keep people from debunking the intellectual/emotional basis of the colonialism, of the militarism of the colonizers.

In Germany the myth has ridiculously warped the general personality of the people. But it’s not just Germany: The longer European and American intellectual thought has in its foundation this false postulate that is the holocaust, the weirder, dumber (and more aggressive toward other nations) things are going to get.

It’s time to move beyond the myth.

http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/

See more here:
Calling all Debunkers, and anyone who thinks Holocaust Denial is …

Fair Usage Law

July 8, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed

The Truth about Leo Frank and Mary Phagan

Leo Frank was a criminal who murdered a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan in 1913. Because he was the Atlanta chapter head of B’nai B’rith (essentially, Brotherhood of the Chosen), many Jews from across the US worked in a concerted movement to free him for the crime, with one Jewish donor alone donating $100,000 towards […]

Fair Usage Law

November 26, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith Responds to Filthy Jewish Terrorists

Responding to: http://www.filthyjewishterrorists.org/FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEB’nai Brith Canada calls on Attorney-General to immediately lay hate crime charges against genocide-advocating York studentTORONTO, 2010 – B’nai Brith Canada has called on Ontario Attorney-General Chris Bentley to move without delay to lay hate crime charges against Salman Hossain, a Bangladeshi-Canadian York University student who has allegedly called for a […]

Fair Usage Law

November 25, 2010   Posted in: Anti Racism, Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Discrimination News, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Racism News, Racist News, Tel Aviv, West Bank  Comments Closed

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America

B’nai B’rith, British Weapon Against America by Paul Goldstein Rev A – See Notes(from http://wlym.com/campaigner/7812.pdf – 12 MB pdf image-file)Since the time of Philo of Alexandria, as before him, the religion of the antiprogress, landed oligarchy has been and is Isis worship. Through the intervening centuries, the high priesthood of the Isis cult has consciously […]

Fair Usage Law

November 23, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, B'nai B'rith, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank, Race Relations, Racism News, Racist News, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

39 Congressmen advocating for release of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard

39 Congressmen advocating for release of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan PollardJump to CommentsACTION ALERTAMP urges supporters to take action and denounce latest Israel-first policies(CHICAGO 11/22/2010) – Thirty-nine Democratic U.S. Representatives have signed a letter asking President Barak Obama to grant clemency to convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. The elected officials are working in tandem with […]

Fair Usage Law

November 22, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed

The Samson Option explodes one of the world’s most closely guarded secrets—the secret of Israel’s atomic arsenal.

http://www.archive.org/details/Sampson_OptionThe Samson Option explodes one of the world’s most closely guarded secrets—the secret of Israel’s atomic arsenal. It relates, for the first time, the political, diplomatic, and military repercussions that have for decades been concealed from the world.It is also about America’s ability not to see what it does not want to see. All American […]

Fair Usage Law

November 19, 2010   Posted in: AIPAC, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Ashkenazi, Gaza, Golan Heights, Holocaust, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Israel, Jerusalem, Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Sephardic, Tel Aviv, West Bank, White Nationalism, White Supremacism, Zionism  Comments Closed

Vanessa Hudgens Not Converting to Judaism for Zac Efron

Vanessa Hudgens is not converting to Judaism to win over the mother and father of boyfriend Zac Efron. A representative for the Blondie of “Sucker Punch” has denied the claim she is hoping to “score point” with the “Charlie St.

Fair Usage Law

October 21, 2010   Posted in: Judaism  Comments Closed

O, Palestine! – Grendel Report

Concern for Palestine among a few Arab intellectuals, as Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi shows in his book on the subject, did not exist until Zionists began settlements at the turn of the century.

Fair Usage Law

October 6, 2010   Posted in: Jewish, Jewish American Heritage Month, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism, Palestine  Comments Closed

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913

The Lynching of Leo Frank in 1915 and the Murder of Mary Phagan in 1913If you want to know what really happened in the Leo Frank Case you can read the following books. The best books on the subject – 1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan, By Mary Phagan Keanhttp://www.archive.org/details/TheMurderOfMaryPhaganByLeoFrankIn19132. The Abridged Trial Testimony […]

Fair Usage Law

August 13, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jews, Judaism, Leo Frank  Comments Closed

Calling all Debunkers, and anyone who thinks Holocaust Denial is …

Discusion about Calling all Debunkers, and anyone who thinks Holocaust Denial is offensive, debunk this! in the AboveTopSecret.com website alternative topics discussion forum General Conspiracies.

Fair Usage Law

July 8, 2010   Posted in: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitism News, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust Revisionism, Jewish, Jewish Heritage, Jewish History, Jews, Judaism  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."