Archive for the ‘Ramzpaul’ Category

RAMZPAUL: Communism and Diversity

As obsession with quality has become universalized in Advanced white societies where TOO MANY go to college, no one wants to marry a loser or have loser kids. So, too many whites think they only deserve good jobs and wont marry or have kids unless they can ensure quality.

Menial jobs are beneath them. So, they bring in foreigners to do it. Japan too is taking in more Filipinos and others. As loser jobs become associated with lowly foreigners, whites would rather give up and turn to drugs than do them and be associated with lowly foreigners. Over time, foreigners will take over just like Filipinos took over Hawaii and Mexers took over California and Texas. Its like the ultra-elitist Spartans lost out. And so did whites in South Africa.

In this sense, Mexicans and Filipinos have a better long term strategy than Japanese, Germans, Koreans, and other quality-obsessives. Mexers and Filos may have lower IQ, but they have kids because they simply like the idea of family. And they love their kids even if the kids arent A students.In the past, most people in West didnt go to college, and accepted that as fact, and had kids just to have kids cuz family is nice. But with everyone going to college, expectations of quality are way up. Also, when women go to college, their idea of marrying-up goes way up, and many end up not marrying at all. Big problem in Iran.Simple rule: Men will marry women without jobs, but women will not marry men without good jobs. So, when women take more good jobs from men, its BAD business.

http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-iran-unmarried-snap-story.html

In John Judis book on the founding of Israel, he mentions how Zionists early on understood that the manual work must also be done by Jews. If Jews came to rely on the labor of lowly Arabs, the latter could eventually outnumber and take over. So, many Zionist settlers decided to hire Jews only. They did the opposite of what whites in South Africa did. Well, look at the long-term results of both nations.So, Zionism had to go against the grain of Jewish history where Jews settled in middlemen and brainy fields. They had to learn to love labor, like Biff in DEATH OF A SALESMAN. While society is led by brains, it is supported by the body. And unless mind and body are united in blood, they eventually clash and things fall apart.

See original here:

RAMZPAUL: Communism and Diversity

Fair Usage Law

June 15, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Are mass shooters disproportionately White …

After a mass shooting you typically will hear from Leftists that we have a White Christian problem. They will admit that, yes, sometimes Muslims commit mass shootings, but the REAL problem is with White Christians.

So I decided to do my own quick and dirty research. Below are the top 12 deadliest shootings in America’s history. Notice that over 50% have happened in the last 10 years.

Here is the chart of the racial and religious backgrounds of the shooters. I have also categorized the motive.

If we look at it racially, Whites are actually lower that what would be expected based on the percentage of the population.

And here are the religious backgrounds of the shooters compared to the population. Muslims and atheists are greatly overrepresented.

The motives can be somewhat unclear. But the big three causes seem to be:

1. Religious hatred2. Revenge / Financial loss3. Mental illness

Read this article:

RAMZPAUL: Are mass shooters disproportionately White …

Fair Usage Law

May 17, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Mark Anthony Conditt – Why did he do it?

Probably another white guy who, like Dylan Roof, thinks black and brown people are the problem. If you killed a thousand blacks, the government would just shrug, throw your ass in jail, and import another million blacks from Africa.

Lions are far more motivated to kill you than blacks are, yet no one thinks lions are a problem. Why not? If treasonous elites decided to let lions walk our streets*, would they be a problem then? A: Only if “they” refers to the treasonous elites! St. Breivik, pray for us.

*This has been seriously proposed:http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/02/19/the-bizarre-plan-to-reintroduce-elephants-lions-to-north-america/

More:

RAMZPAUL: Mark Anthony Conditt – Why did he do it?

Fair Usage Law

April 19, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: The State of the Union address

http://www.unz.com/video/ramzpaul_the-state-of-the-union-address-2018/

It was fun watching the Twitter commentary concerning the State of the Union address.

A CNN commentator noted that Melania was wearing white which obviously must be a dog whistle to White supremacy.

When she was called on this, she used the “just a prank, bro” defense.

Yeah, this is a CNN commentator.

Go here to see the original:

RAMZPAUL: The State of the Union address

Fair Usage Law

March 14, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Trump Call Haiti a Shithole – updated

I received the following e-mail from YouTube –

Until that time, here it a mirror of the video –

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZGbcwTpqkMfx/

Update – I won my appeal. My YouTube video is again Public.

See the rest here:

RAMZPAUL: Trump Call Haiti a Shithole – updated

Fair Usage Law

February 25, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL vs. Richard Spencer Occidental Dissent

A big exchange here.

1.) First, I am not a National Socialist or a Neo-Nazi. In my experience, fascism strikes a chord with some people. It has never interested me all that much. Im more interested in other topics.

2.) Second, this perennial debate over whether Neo-Nazis make us look bad has been going on forever. Ive been around for 15 years now and it is the same debate. It will still be going on 15 years from now.

3.) Third, even if you were to condemn the Neo-Nazis, they arent going anywhere. They will set up their own websites and organizations. Daily Stormer, for example, is thriving.

4.) Fourth, I could condemn the Neo-Nazis, but what would I gain from it? Ive learned from experience that it would just create a headache for me. Its not going to impress anyone. Im not going to become respectable because I have made a point to disavow someone. In the eyes of our enemies, Im just as deplorable as any brownshirt. Those who have been reading this blog for years already know I am not a Neo-Nazi.

5.) Fifth, the Neo-Nazis are not having as big a negative impact as Ramzpaul assumes here. Daily Stormer didnt stop Trump from winning the election. Andrew Anglin and his followers had nothing to do with the NPI conference. Former Grand Dragon David Duke didnt stop Trump from winning the election. The usual scaremongering of screaming Neo-Nazi, KKK, racist, etc., etc., didnt work this time.

6.) Sixth, it was hordes of trolls from places like 4chan and 8chan aggressively trolling journalists on Twitter that put the alt-right on the map. There is no denying that tactic worked.

7.) Finally, the Neo-Nazis have never been more aggressive online than they were in 2015-2016, and the Alt-Right just had its best year ever. I think reports of its demise are greatly exaggerated.

Note: Its not my thing. Thats just my honest take on the matter. Whats predictably going to happen is that Ramzpaul is going to rile that crowd up without gaining anything from it.

Excerpt from:

RAMZPAUL vs. Richard Spencer Occidental Dissent

Fair Usage Law

January 31, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RamZPaul Blames Slow Growth of Nationalism on People Who …

RamZPaul is a scatter-brained, beta-male YouTube blogger who has made a name for himself by skirting the edge of pro-White topics just enough to attract a White audience desperate for an honest voice in an anti-White world. His primary tactic is to take the leftist stance against any aspect of White Nationalism that might actually encourage Whites to break free of the Jewish choke collar around their necks.

In a recent video, RamZPaul compares David Duke to Tim Wise, saying that they are the same because each blames a group for the problems of the world. RamZPaul then blames people like Dr. Duke for the problems White Nationalism is having in terms of slow growth. One can only assume the irony of this is above his level of intelligence, which is why he didn’t find it embarrassing to say.

RamZPaul sings Kumbaya regularly in his videos. He is always careful to reinforce liberal brainwashing standards such as the prohibition against “hating” other races, though he–like all leftists–never actually gets around to defining what it means to “hate.” Roughly 100 White women are raped every day in America by Negroes, but I notice that RamZPaul neither acknowledges this fact, nor asks if this means that the Black rapists “hate” White women. He doesn’t bother to ask this because it would expose the shallowness and meaninglessness of the entire stop-the-hate propaganda tool.

What difference does it make, and in what way is it anyone else’s business, if I happen to hate Blacks? My feelings about–or against–Blacks are in my head. I am a sapient being and can choose to act in direct contradiction to my feelings whenever I want to. If HATE really inevitable and inexorably motivates people to attack others, I would most likely have murdered several dozen leftists by now, because I’m going to be completely honest: I HATE libtards.

But I chose to say that for a reason; many people reading this will chuckle when I say I hate leftists because they know exactly what I mean, and they know there isn’t any harm in it. Libtards are bleeping annoying! But so are Jews, and notice how everyone tightens up if I say “I HATE Jews.” Why should that be considered any different? Only because we have been conditioned to do so by leftists and IDIOTS like RamZPaul who reinforce their stupid ideas.

RamZPaul, if you ever read this, sit down and have a long think about whether or not it actually makes any difference at all if I hate non-Whites. What matters is what we DO, and they are KILLING MY RACE and DESTROYING OUR NATIONS. I don’t give a crap if they “hate” us; I just want them to stop destroying us. Let me know if you need me to simplify that for you, pinhead. If feelings were all that mattered, all that dictated my behavior, I would run around shrieking at all the annoying people in the world, snatching every tasty thing that someone is eating in front of me when I’m hungry, and tackling all the cute White guys to the ground when they have the right set of characteristics. I don’t do those things because I’m not an animal–or a Negro.

Another concept RamZPaul can’t seem to wrap his saggy little brain around is the fact that our objecting to people blaming Whites for everything is NOT simply because they are blaming someone other than themselves, but rather because we aren’t really the cause of the problems they blame us for. (Again, you might want to write this down, vlogger-boy.) When one person shoots another person for no reason, the victim honestly is not “blaming” in the sense that you are using it when they complain about the shooter. Sometimes things that happen actually are somebody else’s fault. Did you really need me to explain that to you? Was this not OBVIOUS?

Like the stereotyping piece of garbage RamZPaul is, he claims that Dr. Duke “blames Jews for every problem in the world.” No, he most certainly does not blame Jews for every problem in the world, but we can hardly expect RamZPaul to either know or care what he is talking about when he is careful to list Dr. Duke’s history in his video description IN EXACTLY THE SAME WAY THAT EVERY LAST LEFTIST “JOURNALIST” DOES. Gee, Ramz, how long did it take you to come up with THAT on your own, or did someone higher up “suggest” it to you? What purpose did it serve?

What Dr. Duke blames Jews for is exactly what they are responsible for, and nothing else. This is useful to us as a race in order to be on our guard and know whom we can and cannot trust. It has nothing at all to do with “saying we can never change because the Jews will stop us no matter what.” David Duke has never made any such assertion. If RamZPaul were intelligent enough and respectful enough of the truth to actually look into the facts of Jewish over-representation in positions of power in government and media, and Jewish origination of or involvement in nearly every damaging, anti-White policy enacted in our nations in modern history, he might take a different stance on Dr. Duke’s discussions. Pointing out who really is to blame for a certain event is not “blaming” in the strawman way RamZPaul characterizes it, but simply an honest explanation of forbidden facts.

But then RamZPaul wouldn’t be welcome on YouTube anymore if he started getting truly honest about these kinds of things, would he. And he’s not bright enough to see the significance of that fact. What’s that Kevin Strom quote that everyone always misattributes to Voltaire: “To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?” Well, Ramz, I don’t suppose you’ve ever asked yourself since you already know because they are your bosses, aren’t they!

And why do I say that? Because intentionally or not, RamZPaul supports them and their strangle-hold on Western thought and Western discourse. RamZPaul criticizes people like Craig Cobb for being “plants” because of the sometimes silly things they do and the use leftists make of those careless actions to misrepresent White Nationalism. What RamZPaul fails to notice is that the left, as a matter of course, does even more silly things on a daily basis AND NOBODY IN THE MEDIA SAYS ANYTHING ABOUT THEM AT ALL. So it’s not that some of our people screw up, Ramz, it’s that there’s always someone like you waiting to tell us that’s the problem with our movement when–judging by the typical idiotic face of the left–it doesn’t really make any INHERENT difference at all. If we were all saintly logicians, the left would still find a way to demonize us and we wouldn’t be making progress any faster than we are right now, and that’s because the average member of society (like RamZPaul, for instance) is too stupid to understand the difference between a trend and an outlier, or a virtue and a platitude, or a fact and emotional propaganda, or understandable anger and “HATE”.

I’m glad you’re not really in our movement, RamZPaul–not because you would make it “look bad,” but because you’re too stupid to work out truth for yourself and (at this rate) you’re never going to be anything but an obedient pro-leftist sheep, and therefore have nothing to contribute. Enjoy making your goofy little blog vids, and contact us if you ever decide to grow up.

Go here to see the original:

RamZPaul Blames Slow Growth of Nationalism on People Who …

Fair Usage Law

January 31, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

Alt-Right YouTuber Sparks Racist Attack on Star Wars …

Share

Share

Share

Email

Kelly Marie Tran, the newest face in the Star Wars franchise, has been accepted by the public as the beloved, relatable hero from The Last Jedi.

Unfortunately, not everyone seems to agree, especially Alt-Right internet personality Paul Ray Ramsey, who took to Twitter on December 18 to make fun of Tran and her appearance.

His followers eagerly joined in, tweeting nasty comments about her weight, race, and appeal.

Ramsey also posted a video to his YouTube, wherein he sarcastically praised The Last Jedi for its progressive nature, again poking fun at Trans casting decision.

Largely considered to be one of the most important representatives of the Alt-Right, Ramsey holds a lot of sway with this population, and his comments encourage racism, sexism, and other discriminatory behaviors from his tens of thousands of followers. In an attempt to soften his messages, he often uses his brand of comedy in his videos, blogs, and social media posts.

Featured Image via YouTube / ramzpaul

Read more:

Alt-Right YouTuber Sparks Racist Attack on Star Wars …

Fair Usage Law

January 12, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

Ramzpaul: Life As American Political Dissident Occidental …

Watch the video.

Ramzpauls exile and relocation to Hungary for his heretical rejection of Americanism is directly related to this:

Over the last year or so, though, its become increasingly clear to me that one of the great tides of American politics has turned and is flowing out to sea. For almost precisely two hundred years, this countrys political discourse has been shapedmore powerfully, perhaps, than by any other single forceby the loose bundle of ideas, interests, and values we can call American liberalism. Thats the tide thats turning. The most important trends shaping the political landscape of our time, to my mind, are the descent of the liberal movement into its final decadence, and the first stirrings of the postliberal politics that is already emerging in its wake.

Three major social issues formed the framework around which the new movement coalesced. The first was the abolition of slavery; the second was the prohibition of alcohol; the third was the improvement of the legal status of women. (The movement traversed a long and convoluted road before this latter goal took its ultimate form of legal and social equality between the genders.) There were plenty of other issues that attracted their own share of attention from the movementdietary reform, dress reform, pacifism, and the likebut all of them shared a common theme: the redefinition of politics as an expression of values.

Lets take a moment to unpack that last phrase. Politics at that time, and at most other periods throughout human history, was understood as a straightforward matter of interestsin the bluntest of terms, who got what benefits and who paid what costs. Then and for most of a century thereafter, for example, one of the things that happened in the wake of every Presidential election is that the winners party got to hand out federal jobs en masse to its supporters. It was called the spoils system, as in to the victor belongs the spoils; people flocked to campaign for this or that presidential candidate as much in the hope of getting a comfortable federal job as for anyother reason. Nobody saw anything wrong with that system, because politics was about interests.

Values, in the thought of the time, belonged to church and to the private conscience of the individual; politics was about interests pure and simple.

Newborn American liberalism, though, rejected the division between politics and values. Their opposition to slavery, for example, had nothing to do with the divergent economic interests of the industrializing northern states and the plantation economy of the South, and everything to do with a devoutly held conviction that chattel slavery was morally wrong. Their opposition to alcohol, to the laws that denied civil rights to women, to war, and to everything else on the lengthy shopping list of the movement had to do with moral values, not with interests. Thats where you see the impact of the movements Protestant heritage: it took values out of the church and tried to apply them to the world as a whole. At the time, that was exotic enough that the moral crusades just mentioned got about as much political traction at the time as the colorful fantasies of the 1960s did in their own day.

Thats exactly it!

Were strangers in the mainstream American political landscape. It is because we think in terms of interests, not values.

Why is it in our interests to become a despised, persecuted minority in our own lands? Why is it in our interests to admit a million Syrian refugees into this country? Why is it in our interests to support civil rights laws which have destroyed our great cities? Why is it in our interests to fight all these stupid foreign wars and to defend the borders of foreign countries like Ukraine and South Korea, but not our own border?

But but muh values, says the mainstream Right and Left! Dont you believe in American exceptionalism? Dont you believe in Freedom, Equality, Tolerance, Human Rights, and Progress? Dont you recite the catechism of the Declaration that all men are created equal?

In this country, you cant just say: no, not really, I dont believe in your hoary bromides and shopworn values. I believe in facts, reality, empirical evidence and the pursuit of my interests. If you show the slightest doubt in Freedom or Equality, you are tagged EVIL and WICKED and banished into social and political exile.

Continue reading here:

Ramzpaul: Life As American Political Dissident Occidental …

Fair Usage Law

January 8, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Communism and Diversity

As obsession with quality has become universalized in Advanced white societies where TOO MANY go to college, no one wants to marry a loser or have loser kids. So, too many whites think they only deserve good jobs and wont marry or have kids unless they can ensure quality. Menial jobs are beneath them. So, they bring in foreigners to do it. Japan too is taking in more Filipinos and others. As loser jobs become associated with lowly foreigners, whites would rather give up and turn to drugs than do them and be associated with lowly foreigners. Over time, foreigners will take over just like Filipinos took over Hawaii and Mexers took over California and Texas. Its like the ultra-elitist Spartans lost out. And so did whites in South Africa. In this sense, Mexicans and Filipinos have a better long term strategy than Japanese, Germans, Koreans, and other quality-obsessives. Mexers and Filos may have lower IQ, but they have kids because they simply like the idea of family. And they love their kids even if the kids arent A students.In the past, most people in West didnt go to college, and accepted that as fact, and had kids just to have kids cuz family is nice. But with everyone going to college, expectations of quality are way up. Also, when women go to college, their idea of marrying-up goes way up, and many end up not marrying at all. Big problem in Iran.Simple rule: Men will marry women without jobs, but women will not marry men without good jobs. So, when women take more good jobs from men, its BAD business. http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-iran-unmarried-snap-story.html In John Judis book on the founding of Israel, he mentions how Zionists early on understood that the manual work must also be done by Jews. If Jews came to rely on the labor of lowly Arabs, the latter could eventually outnumber and take over. So, many Zionist settlers decided to hire Jews only. They did the opposite of what whites in South Africa did. Well, look at the long-term results of both nations.So, Zionism had to go against the grain of Jewish history where Jews settled in middlemen and brainy fields. They had to learn to love labor, like Biff in DEATH OF A SALESMAN. While society is led by brains, it is supported by the body. And unless mind and body are united in blood, they eventually clash and things fall apart.

Fair Usage Law

June 15, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Are mass shooters disproportionately White …

After a mass shooting you typically will hear from Leftists that we have a White Christian problem. They will admit that, yes, sometimes Muslims commit mass shootings, but the REAL problem is with White Christians. So I decided to do my own quick and dirty research. Below are the top 12 deadliest shootings in America’s history. Notice that over 50% have happened in the last 10 years. Here is the chart of the racial and religious backgrounds of the shooters. I have also categorized the motive. If we look at it racially, Whites are actually lower that what would be expected based on the percentage of the population. And here are the religious backgrounds of the shooters compared to the population. Muslims and atheists are greatly overrepresented. The motives can be somewhat unclear. But the big three causes seem to be: 1. Religious hatred2. Revenge / Financial loss3. Mental illness

Fair Usage Law

May 17, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Mark Anthony Conditt – Why did he do it?

Probably another white guy who, like Dylan Roof, thinks black and brown people are the problem. If you killed a thousand blacks, the government would just shrug, throw your ass in jail, and import another million blacks from Africa. Lions are far more motivated to kill you than blacks are, yet no one thinks lions are a problem. Why not? If treasonous elites decided to let lions walk our streets*, would they be a problem then? A: Only if “they” refers to the treasonous elites! St. Breivik, pray for us. *This has been seriously proposed:http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/02/19/the-bizarre-plan-to-reintroduce-elephants-lions-to-north-america/

Fair Usage Law

April 19, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: The State of the Union address

http://www.unz.com/video/ramzpaul_the-state-of-the-union-address-2018/ It was fun watching the Twitter commentary concerning the State of the Union address. A CNN commentator noted that Melania was wearing white which obviously must be a dog whistle to White supremacy. When she was called on this, she used the “just a prank, bro” defense. Yeah, this is a CNN commentator.

Fair Usage Law

March 14, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL: Trump Call Haiti a Shithole – updated

I received the following e-mail from YouTube – Until that time, here it a mirror of the video – https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZGbcwTpqkMfx/ Update – I won my appeal. My YouTube video is again Public.

Fair Usage Law

February 25, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RAMZPAUL vs. Richard Spencer Occidental Dissent

A big exchange here. 1.) First, I am not a National Socialist or a Neo-Nazi. In my experience, fascism strikes a chord with some people. It has never interested me all that much. Im more interested in other topics. 2.) Second, this perennial debate over whether Neo-Nazis make us look bad has been going on forever. Ive been around for 15 years now and it is the same debate. It will still be going on 15 years from now. 3.) Third, even if you were to condemn the Neo-Nazis, they arent going anywhere. They will set up their own websites and organizations. Daily Stormer, for example, is thriving. 4.) Fourth, I could condemn the Neo-Nazis, but what would I gain from it? Ive learned from experience that it would just create a headache for me. Its not going to impress anyone. Im not going to become respectable because I have made a point to disavow someone. In the eyes of our enemies, Im just as deplorable as any brownshirt. Those who have been reading this blog for years already know I am not a Neo-Nazi. 5.) Fifth, the Neo-Nazis are not having as big a negative impact as Ramzpaul assumes here. Daily Stormer didnt stop Trump from winning the election. Andrew Anglin and his followers had nothing to do with the NPI conference. Former Grand Dragon David Duke didnt stop Trump from winning the election. The usual scaremongering of screaming Neo-Nazi, KKK, racist, etc., etc., didnt work this time. 6.) Sixth, it was hordes of trolls from places like 4chan and 8chan aggressively trolling journalists on Twitter that put the alt-right on the map. There is no denying that tactic worked. 7.) Finally, the Neo-Nazis have never been more aggressive online than they were in 2015-2016, and the Alt-Right just had its best year ever. I think reports of its demise are greatly exaggerated. Note: Its not my thing. Thats just my honest take on the matter. Whats predictably going to happen is that Ramzpaul is going to rile that crowd up without gaining anything from it.

Fair Usage Law

January 31, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

RamZPaul Blames Slow Growth of Nationalism on People Who …

RamZPaul is a scatter-brained, beta-male YouTube blogger who has made a name for himself by skirting the edge of pro-White topics just enough to attract a White audience desperate for an honest voice in an anti-White world. His primary tactic is to take the leftist stance against any aspect of White Nationalism that might actually encourage Whites to break free of the Jewish choke collar around their necks. In a recent video, RamZPaul compares David Duke to Tim Wise, saying that they are the same because each blames a group for the problems of the world. RamZPaul then blames people like Dr. Duke for the problems White Nationalism is having in terms of slow growth. One can only assume the irony of this is above his level of intelligence, which is why he didn’t find it embarrassing to say. RamZPaul sings Kumbaya regularly in his videos. He is always careful to reinforce liberal brainwashing standards such as the prohibition against “hating” other races, though he–like all leftists–never actually gets around to defining what it means to “hate.” Roughly 100 White women are raped every day in America by Negroes, but I notice that RamZPaul neither acknowledges this fact, nor asks if this means that the Black rapists “hate” White women. He doesn’t bother to ask this because it would expose the shallowness and meaninglessness of the entire stop-the-hate propaganda tool. What difference does it make, and in what way is it anyone else’s business, if I happen to hate Blacks? My feelings about–or against–Blacks are in my head. I am a sapient being and can choose to act in direct contradiction to my feelings whenever I want to. If HATE really inevitable and inexorably motivates people to attack others, I would most likely have murdered several dozen leftists by now, because I’m going to be completely honest: I HATE libtards. But I chose to say that for a reason; many people reading this will chuckle when I say I hate leftists because they know exactly what I mean, and they know there isn’t any harm in it. Libtards are bleeping annoying! But so are Jews, and notice how everyone tightens up if I say “I HATE Jews.” Why should that be considered any different? Only because we have been conditioned to do so by leftists and IDIOTS like RamZPaul who reinforce their stupid ideas. RamZPaul, if you ever read this, sit down and have a long think about whether or not it actually makes any difference at all if I hate non-Whites. What matters is what we DO, and they are KILLING MY RACE and DESTROYING OUR NATIONS. I don’t give a crap if they “hate” us; I just want them to stop destroying us. Let me know if you need me to simplify that for you, pinhead. If feelings were all that mattered, all that dictated my behavior, I would run around shrieking at all the annoying people in the world, snatching every tasty thing that someone is eating in front of me when I’m hungry, and tackling all the cute White guys to the ground when they have the right set of characteristics. I don’t do those things because I’m not an animal–or a Negro. Another concept RamZPaul can’t seem to wrap his saggy little brain around is the fact that our objecting to people blaming Whites for everything is NOT simply because they are blaming someone other than themselves, but rather because we aren’t really the cause of the problems they blame us for. (Again, you might want to write this down, vlogger-boy.) When one person shoots another person for no reason, the victim honestly is not “blaming” in the sense that you are using it when they complain about the shooter. Sometimes things that happen actually are somebody else’s fault. Did you really need me to explain that to you? Was this not OBVIOUS? Like the stereotyping piece of garbage RamZPaul is, he claims that Dr. Duke “blames Jews for every problem in the world.” No, he most certainly does not blame Jews for every problem in the world, but we can hardly expect RamZPaul to either know or care what he is talking about when he is careful to list Dr. Duke’s history in his video description IN EXACTLY THE SAME WAY THAT EVERY LAST LEFTIST “JOURNALIST” DOES. Gee, Ramz, how long did it take you to come up with THAT on your own, or did someone higher up “suggest” it to you? What purpose did it serve? What Dr. Duke blames Jews for is exactly what they are responsible for, and nothing else. This is useful to us as a race in order to be on our guard and know whom we can and cannot trust. It has nothing at all to do with “saying we can never change because the Jews will stop us no matter what.” David Duke has never made any such assertion. If RamZPaul were intelligent enough and respectful enough of the truth to actually look into the facts of Jewish over-representation in positions of power in government and media, and Jewish origination of or involvement in nearly every damaging, anti-White policy enacted in our nations in modern history, he might take a different stance on Dr. Duke’s discussions. Pointing out who really is to blame for a certain event is not “blaming” in the strawman way RamZPaul characterizes it, but simply an honest explanation of forbidden facts. But then RamZPaul wouldn’t be welcome on YouTube anymore if he started getting truly honest about these kinds of things, would he. And he’s not bright enough to see the significance of that fact. What’s that Kevin Strom quote that everyone always misattributes to Voltaire: “To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?” Well, Ramz, I don’t suppose you’ve ever asked yourself since you already know because they are your bosses, aren’t they! And why do I say that? Because intentionally or not, RamZPaul supports them and their strangle-hold on Western thought and Western discourse. RamZPaul criticizes people like Craig Cobb for being “plants” because of the sometimes silly things they do and the use leftists make of those careless actions to misrepresent White Nationalism. What RamZPaul fails to notice is that the left, as a matter of course, does even more silly things on a daily basis AND NOBODY IN THE MEDIA SAYS ANYTHING ABOUT THEM AT ALL. So it’s not that some of our people screw up, Ramz, it’s that there’s always someone like you waiting to tell us that’s the problem with our movement when–judging by the typical idiotic face of the left–it doesn’t really make any INHERENT difference at all. If we were all saintly logicians, the left would still find a way to demonize us and we wouldn’t be making progress any faster than we are right now, and that’s because the average member of society (like RamZPaul, for instance) is too stupid to understand the difference between a trend and an outlier, or a virtue and a platitude, or a fact and emotional propaganda, or understandable anger and “HATE”. I’m glad you’re not really in our movement, RamZPaul–not because you would make it “look bad,” but because you’re too stupid to work out truth for yourself and (at this rate) you’re never going to be anything but an obedient pro-leftist sheep, and therefore have nothing to contribute. Enjoy making your goofy little blog vids, and contact us if you ever decide to grow up.

Fair Usage Law

January 31, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

Alt-Right YouTuber Sparks Racist Attack on Star Wars …

Share Share Share Email Kelly Marie Tran, the newest face in the Star Wars franchise, has been accepted by the public as the beloved, relatable hero from The Last Jedi. Unfortunately, not everyone seems to agree, especially Alt-Right internet personality Paul Ray Ramsey, who took to Twitter on December 18 to make fun of Tran and her appearance. His followers eagerly joined in, tweeting nasty comments about her weight, race, and appeal. Ramsey also posted a video to his YouTube, wherein he sarcastically praised The Last Jedi for its progressive nature, again poking fun at Trans casting decision. Largely considered to be one of the most important representatives of the Alt-Right, Ramsey holds a lot of sway with this population, and his comments encourage racism, sexism, and other discriminatory behaviors from his tens of thousands of followers. In an attempt to soften his messages, he often uses his brand of comedy in his videos, blogs, and social media posts. Featured Image via YouTube / ramzpaul

Fair Usage Law

January 12, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed

Ramzpaul: Life As American Political Dissident Occidental …

Watch the video. Ramzpauls exile and relocation to Hungary for his heretical rejection of Americanism is directly related to this: Over the last year or so, though, its become increasingly clear to me that one of the great tides of American politics has turned and is flowing out to sea. For almost precisely two hundred years, this countrys political discourse has been shapedmore powerfully, perhaps, than by any other single forceby the loose bundle of ideas, interests, and values we can call American liberalism. Thats the tide thats turning. The most important trends shaping the political landscape of our time, to my mind, are the descent of the liberal movement into its final decadence, and the first stirrings of the postliberal politics that is already emerging in its wake. Three major social issues formed the framework around which the new movement coalesced. The first was the abolition of slavery; the second was the prohibition of alcohol; the third was the improvement of the legal status of women. (The movement traversed a long and convoluted road before this latter goal took its ultimate form of legal and social equality between the genders.) There were plenty of other issues that attracted their own share of attention from the movementdietary reform, dress reform, pacifism, and the likebut all of them shared a common theme: the redefinition of politics as an expression of values. Lets take a moment to unpack that last phrase. Politics at that time, and at most other periods throughout human history, was understood as a straightforward matter of interestsin the bluntest of terms, who got what benefits and who paid what costs. Then and for most of a century thereafter, for example, one of the things that happened in the wake of every Presidential election is that the winners party got to hand out federal jobs en masse to its supporters. It was called the spoils system, as in to the victor belongs the spoils; people flocked to campaign for this or that presidential candidate as much in the hope of getting a comfortable federal job as for anyother reason. Nobody saw anything wrong with that system, because politics was about interests. Values, in the thought of the time, belonged to church and to the private conscience of the individual; politics was about interests pure and simple. Newborn American liberalism, though, rejected the division between politics and values. Their opposition to slavery, for example, had nothing to do with the divergent economic interests of the industrializing northern states and the plantation economy of the South, and everything to do with a devoutly held conviction that chattel slavery was morally wrong. Their opposition to alcohol, to the laws that denied civil rights to women, to war, and to everything else on the lengthy shopping list of the movement had to do with moral values, not with interests. Thats where you see the impact of the movements Protestant heritage: it took values out of the church and tried to apply them to the world as a whole. At the time, that was exotic enough that the moral crusades just mentioned got about as much political traction at the time as the colorful fantasies of the 1960s did in their own day. Thats exactly it! Were strangers in the mainstream American political landscape. It is because we think in terms of interests, not values. Why is it in our interests to become a despised, persecuted minority in our own lands? Why is it in our interests to admit a million Syrian refugees into this country? Why is it in our interests to support civil rights laws which have destroyed our great cities? Why is it in our interests to fight all these stupid foreign wars and to defend the borders of foreign countries like Ukraine and South Korea, but not our own border? But but muh values, says the mainstream Right and Left! Dont you believe in American exceptionalism? Dont you believe in Freedom, Equality, Tolerance, Human Rights, and Progress? Dont you recite the catechism of the Declaration that all men are created equal? In this country, you cant just say: no, not really, I dont believe in your hoary bromides and shopworn values. I believe in facts, reality, empirical evidence and the pursuit of my interests. If you show the slightest doubt in Freedom or Equality, you are tagged EVIL and WICKED and banished into social and political exile.

Fair Usage Law

January 8, 2018   Posted in: Ramzpaul  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."