Archive for the ‘William Luther Pierce’ Category

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945: William L. Pierce …

‘).appendTo(flyout.elem());var panelGroup=flyout.getName()+’SubCats’;var hideTimeout=null;var sloppyTrigger=createSloppyTrigger($parent);var showParent=function(){if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;} if(visible){return;} var height=$(‘#nav-flyout-shopAll’).height(); $parent.css({‘height’: height});$parent.animate({width:’show’},{duration:200,complete:function(){$parent.css({overflow:’visible’});}});visible=true;};var hideParentNow=function(){$parent.stop().css({overflow:’hidden’,display:’none’,width:’auto’,height:’auto’});panels.hideAll({group:panelGroup});visible=false;if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;}};var hideParent=function(){if(!visible){return;} if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;} hideTimeout=setTimeout(hideParentNow,10);};flyout.onHide(function(){sloppyTrigger.disable();hideParentNow();this.elem().hide();});var addPanel=function($link,panelKey){var panel=dataPanel({className:’nav-subcat’,dataKey:panelKey,groups:[panelGroup],spinner:false,visible:false});if(!flyoutDebug){var mouseout=mouseOutUtility();mouseout.add(flyout.elem());mouseout.action(function(){panel.hide();});mouseout.enable();} var a11y=a11yHandler({link:$link,onEscape:function(){panel.hide();$link.focus();}});var logPanelInteraction=function(promoID,wlTriggers){var logNow=$F.once().on(function(){var panelEvent=$.extend({},event,{id:promoID});if(config.browsePromos&&!!config.browsePromos[promoID]){panelEvent.bp=1;} logEvent(panelEvent);phoneHome.trigger(wlTriggers);});if(panel.isVisible()&&panel.hasInteracted()){logNow();}else{panel.onInteract(logNow);}};panel.onData(function(data){renderPromo(data.promoID,panel.elem());logPanelInteraction(data.promoID,data.wlTriggers);});panel.onShow(function(){var columnCount=$(‘.nav-column’,panel.elem()).length;panel.elem().addClass(‘nav-colcount-‘+columnCount);showParent();var $subCatLinks=$(‘.nav-subcat-links > a’,panel.elem());var length=$subCatLinks.length;if(length>0){var firstElementLeftPos=$subCatLinks.eq(0).offset().left;for(var i=1;i’+ catTitle+”);panel.elem().prepend($subPanelTitle);}} $link.addClass(‘nav-active’);});panel.onHide(function(){$link.removeClass(‘nav-active’);hideParent();a11y.disable();sloppyTrigger.disable();});panel.onShow(function(){a11y.elems($(‘a, area’,panel.elem()));});sloppyTrigger.register($link,panel);if(flyoutDebug){$link.click(function(){if(panel.isVisible()){panel.hide();}else{panel.show();}});} var panelKeyHandler=onKey($link,function(){if(this.isEnter()||this.isSpace()){panel.show();}},’keydown’,false);$link.focus(function(){panelKeyHandler.bind();}).blur(function(){panelKeyHandler.unbind();});panel.elem().appendTo($parent);};var hideParentAndResetTrigger=function(){hideParent();sloppyTrigger.disable();};for(var i=0;i

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required.

Flip to back Flip to front

See the original post:

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945: William L. Pierce …

Fair Usage Law

May 15, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Franklin Pierce | Biography & Facts | Britannica.com

Franklin Pierce, byname Young Hickory, (born November 23, 1804, Hillsboro, New Hampshire, U.S.died October 8, 1869, Concord, New Hampshire), 14th president of the United States (185357). He failed to deal effectively with the corroding sectional controversy over slavery in the decade preceding the American Civil War (186165). (For a discussion of the history and nature of the presidency, see presidency of the United States of America.)

The son of a governor of New Hampshire, Benjamin Pierce, and the former Anna Kendrick, Franklin Pierce attended Bowdoin College in Maine, studied law in Northampton, Massachusetts, and was admitted to the bar in 1827. He married Jane Means Appleton, whose father was president of Bowdoin, in 1834.

Pierce entered political life in New Hampshire as a Democrat, serving in the state legislature (182933), the U.S. House of Representatives (183337), and the Senate (183742). Handsome, affable, charming, and possessed of a certain superficial brilliance, Pierce made many friends in Congress, but his career there was otherwise undistinguished. He was a devoted supporter of Pres. Andrew Jackson but was continually overshadowed by older and more prominent men on the national scene. Resigning from the Senate for personal reasons, he returned to Concord, where he resumed his law practice and also served as federal district attorney.

Except for a brief stint as an officer in the Mexican-American War (184648), Pierce remained out of the public eye until the nominating convention of the Democratic Party in 1852. After a deadlock developed among supporters of the leading presidential contendersLewis Cass, Stephen A. Douglas, and James Buchanana coalition of New England and Southern delegates proposed Young Hickory (a reference to Andrew Jackson, who had been known as Old Hickory), and Pierce was nominated on the 49th ballot. The ensuing presidential campaign was dominated by the controversy over slavery and the finality of the Compromise of 1850. Although both the Democrats and the Whigs declared themselves in favour of the compromise, the Democrats were more thoroughly united in their support. As a result, Pierce, who was almost unknown nationally, unexpectedly won the November election, defeating the Whig candidate Winfield Scott by 254 votes to 42 in the electoral college. Pierces triumph was quickly marred by tragedy, however, when, a few weeks before his inauguration, he and his wife witnessed the death of their only surviving child, 11-year-old Bennie, in a railroad accident. Jane Pierce, who had always opposed her husbands candidacy, never fully recovered from the shock.

At the time of his election, Pierce, age 47, was the youngest man to have been elected to the presidency. Representing the Eastern element of the Democratic Party, which was inclined for the sake of harmony and business prosperity to oppose antislavery agitation and generally to placate Southern opinion, Pierce tried to promote sectional unity by filling his cabinet with extremists from both sides of the slavery debate. He also attempted to sidestep the fierce sectional antagonisms of the domestic scene by ambitiously and aggressively promoting the extension of U.S. territorial and commercial interests abroad. In an effort to buy the island of Cuba from Spain, he ordered the U.S. minister to Spain, Pierre Soul, to try to secure the influence of European financiers on the Spanish government. The resulting diplomatic statement, the Ostend Manifesto (October 1854), was interpreted by the American public as a call to wrest Cuba from Spain by force if necessary. The ensuing controversy forced the administration to disclaim responsibility for the document and to recall Soul. In 1855 an American adventurer, William Walker, conducted a notorious expedition into Central America with the hope of establishing a proslavery government under the control of the United States. In Nicaragua he established himself as military dictactor and then as president, and his dubious regime was recognized by the Pierce administration. A more lasting diplomatic achievement came from the expedition that Pres. Millard Fillmore had sent to Japan in 1853 under Commodore Matthew C. Perry. In 1854 Pierce received Perrys report that his expedition had been successful and that U.S. ships would have limited access to Japanese ports. The Pierce administration also reorganized the diplomatic and consular service and created the United States Court of Claims.

Among Pierces domestic policies were preparations for a transcontinental railroad and the opening of the Northwest for settlement. In 1853, in order to create a southerly route to California, the U.S. minister to Mexico, James Gadsden, negotiated the purchase of almost 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory (the Gadsden Purchase), for $10 million. Mainly to stimulate migration to the Northwest and to facilitate the construction of a central route to the Pacific, Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. This measure, which opened two new territories for settlement, included repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 (by which slavery in the territories was prohibited north of latitude 36 30) and provided that the status of the territories as free or slave would be decided by popular sovereignty. The indignation aroused by the act and the resulting period of violent conflict in the Kansas Territory were the main causes of the rise of the Republican Party in the mid-1850s. Owing to his ineptness in handling the situation in Kansas, Pierce was denied renomination by the Democrats, and he remains the only president to be so repudiated by his party. After an extended tour of Europe he retired to Concord. Always a heavy drinker, Pierce descended further into apparent alcoholism, and he died in obscurity.

The table provides a list of cabinet members in the administration of President Franklin Pierce.

Follow this link:

Franklin Pierce | Biography & Facts | Britannica.com

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Dr William Luther Pierce – Hunter Pdf 2018 – iswhere.org

William Luther Pierce – Wikipedia

Hunter. Height, 193 cm (6 ft 4 in). Children, 2. Parent(s), William Luther Pierce Jr. Marguerite Farrell. William Luther Pierce III (September 11, 1933 July 23, 2002) was an American white ….. Print/export. Create a book Download as PDF Printable version…en.wikipedia.org

William Pierce, America’s most important neo-Nazi for some three decades until his death in … William Luther Pierce’s bigoted attitudes toward people of color were …. his second novel, Hunter, depicting the assassination of interracial couples,…www.splcenter.org

Read the rest here:

Dr William Luther Pierce – Hunter Pdf 2018 – iswhere.org

Fair Usage Law

December 28, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William Pierce | National Vanguard

Exposing the Warmongering

Jewish Senator Charlie Schumer and Israels Benjamin Netanyahuby Dr. William L. PierceEVERY EVENING when I have turned on the television news during the past few weeks, the message has had the same theme: Saddam Hussein must be stopped! Saddam Hussein is a danger to America! We must destroy

William Pierce supervising a construction project at his facility in West Virginia.by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryNOW WE arrive at what may the most controversial and explosive chapter in Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds, read this week by Vanessa Neubauer

by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryTHIS WEEK Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds read this week by Vanessa Neubauer in our continuing audio book series deals with Dr. William Luther Pierces views on the watershed event of the last 100 years:

Assemblyman Dov HikindIN OUR WEEKLY DISCUSSIONS here I sometimes use careless language which leads to misunderstanding, and when I do Im sorry for it. The problem is that I really have a great deal of work to do, and I usually dont have time to refine and polish my remarks before I go on the

William Gayley Simpson, author of Which Way Western Man?by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryCHAPTER 20 of Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds read this week by Vanessa Neubauer in our continuing series deals with Dr. William Luther Pierce and his

by Dr. William L. PierceQ: With what single aim should members of the Cosmotheist Community shape their institutions and shape their society?A: Their single aim should be service of the Creators Purpose. Every other thing which they may consider desirable in their society justice,

by Dr. William L. PierceSOME OF MY LISTENERS tell me that I talk too much about the Jews, that I blame them for too many things, that the Jews arent the only ones to be blamed for the wrecking of our civilization and our culture, that there are many Jews who arent involved in destructive activities,

by Dr. William L. PierceA LISTENER SENT ME a clipping from the New York Times last month, the November 14 edition, and I just got around to reading it. Its the obituary of a writer and Harvard professor, Dr Richard Marius. Marius had a pretty unremarkable career: a Southern Baptist divinity school

by Dr. William L. PierceWE SPOKE LAST WEEK about the hypocrisy of liberals, about the inherent hypocrisy of liberalism. Lets look at one more example of this. In March 1974 a young Black criminal, Derek Farmer, held up a jewelry store in Dayton, Ohio, with the help of another Black. Shooting broke

Originally posted here:

William Pierce | National Vanguard

Fair Usage Law

December 28, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William R. King – Wikipedia

William R. King13th Vice President of the United StatesIn officeMarch 4, 1853[1] April 18, 1853PresidentFranklin PiercePreceded byMillard FillmoreSucceeded byJohn C. BreckinridgeUnited States Senatorfrom AlabamaIn officeJuly 1, 1848 December 20, 1852Preceded byArthur P. BagbySucceeded byBenjamin FitzpatrickIn officeDecember 14, 1819 April 15, 1844Preceded byNone (Statehood)Succeeded byDixon Hall LewisPresident pro tempore of the United States SenateIn officeMay 6, 1850 December 20, 1852Preceded byDavid Rice AtchisonSucceeded byDavid Rice AtchisonIn officeJuly 1, 1836 March 4, 1841Preceded byJohn TylerSucceeded bySamuel L. SouthardUnited States Minister to FranceIn officeApril 9, 1844 September 15, 1846Preceded byLewis CassSucceeded byRichard RushMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom North Carolina’s 5th districtIn officeMarch 4, 1811 November 4, 1816Preceded byThomas KenanSucceeded byCharles HooksMember of the North Carolina House of CommonsIn office18071809Personal detailsBornWilliam Rufus DeVane King(1786-04-07)April 7, 1786Sampson County, North Carolina, U.S.DiedApril 18, 1853(1853-04-18) (aged67)Selma, Alabama, U.S.Political partyDemocraticOther politicalaffiliationsDemocratic-Republican (Before 1828)Alma materUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillSignature

William Rufus DeVane King (April 7, 1786 April 18, 1853) was an American politician and diplomat. He was the 13th Vice President of the United States for six weeks in 1853 before his death. Earlier he had been elected as a U.S. Representative from North Carolina and a Senator from Alabama. He also served as Minister to France during the reign of King Louis Philippe I.

A Democrat, he was a Unionist and his contemporaries considered him to be a moderate on the issues of sectionalism, slavery and westward expansion, which contributed to the American Civil War. He helped draft the Compromise of 1850.[2] He is the only United States executive official to take the oath of office on foreign soil; he was inaugurated in Havana, Cuba due to poor health. King died of tuberculosis after 45 days in office. With the exceptions of John Tyler and Andrew Johnsonboth of whom succeeded to the Presidencyhe is the shortest-serving Vice President.

King was the only Vice President from the State of Alabama and held the highest political office of any Alabaman in American history. He was the third Vice President to die in office.

King was born in Sampson County, North Carolina, to William King and Margaret deVane. His family was large, wealthy and well-connected. He graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1803, where he was also a member of the Philanthropic Society. Admitted to the bar in 1806 after reading the law with Judge William Duffy of Fayetteville, North Carolina, he began practice in Clinton. King was an ardent Freemason, and was a member of Fayetteville’s Phoenix Lodge No. 8.

King entered politics and was elected as a member of the North Carolina House of Commons, where he served from 1807 to 1809, and he became city solicitor of Wilmington, North Carolina in 1810. He was elected to the Twelfth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Congresses, serving from March 4, 1811 until November 4, 1816, when he resigned to become Secretary of the Legation for William Pinkney during Pinkney’s appointment as Minister to Russia and special diplomatic mission in Naples.

When he returned to the United States in 1818, King joined the westward migration of the cotton culture to the Deep South, purchasing property at what would later be known as “King’s Bend” between present-day Selma and Cahaba on the Alabama River in Dallas County of the new Alabama Territory, which had been recently separated from Mississippi. He developed a large cotton plantation based on slave labor, calling the property “Chestnut Hill”. King and his relatives formed one of the largest slaveholding families in the state, collectively owning as many as 500.

William Rufus King was a delegate to the convention which organized the Alabama state government. Upon the admission of Alabama as the twenty-second State in 1819 he was elected by the State Legislature as a Democratic-Republican to the United States Senate.

King was a follower of Andrew Jackson reelected as a Jacksonian in 1822, 1828, 1834, and 1841, serving from December 14, 1819, until April 15, 1844, when he resigned. During this time, in MarchApril 1824, William R. King was honored with a single vote at the Democratic-Republican Party Caucus to be the party’s candidate for the Office of U.S. Vice President for the upcoming 1824 Presidential election. Later he served as President pro tempore of the United States Senate during the 24th through 27th Congresses. King was Chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Public Lands and the Committee on Commerce.

He was appointed as Minister to France, and served from 1844 to 1846. After his return, King resumed serving in the Senate, appointed and subsequently elected to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Arthur P. Bagby. He held his seat from July 1, 1848 until resigning because of ill health on December 20, 1852, after having been elected Vice President.

During the conflicts leading up to the Compromise of 1850, King supported the Senate’s gag rule against debate on antislavery petitions and opposed proposals to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, which was administered by Congress.[3] King supported a conservative, pro-slavery position, arguing that the Constitution protected the institution of slavery in both the Southern states and the federal territories. He opposed both the abolitionists’ efforts to abolish slavery in the territories as well as the “Fire-Eaters” calls for Southern secession.[3]

On July 11, 1850, two days after the death of President Zachary Taylor, King was appointed Senate President pro tempore. Because Millard Fillmore ascended to the presidency, the vice presidency was vacant, making King first in the line of succession under the law then in effect. He also served as Chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Pensions.

While King may have been asexual or heterosexual (but celibate), there are many indicators that suggest he was homosexual. The argument has been put forward by biographer Jean Baker,[4] supported by Shelley Ross, James W. Loewen and Robert P. Watson.

The source of this interest has been King’s close and intimate relationship with President James Buchanan. The two men lived together for 13 years from 1840 until King’s death in 1853. Buchanan referred to the relationship as a “communion”,[5] and the two attended all parties together. Contemporaries also noted the closeness. Andrew Jackson called them “Miss Nancy” and “Aunt Fancy” (the former being a 19th-century euphemism for an effeminate man[6]), while Aaron V. Brown referred to King as Buchanan’s “better half”.[7] James Loewen has described Buchanan and King as “siamese twins”.

Buchanan adopted King’s mannerisms and romanticised view of southern culture. Both had strong political ambitions and in 1844 they planned to run as president and vice president. Both men were soft, effeminate and eccentric.[5] They spent some time apart while King was on overseas missions in France, and their letters remain cryptic, avoiding revealing any personal feelings at all. In May 1844, Buchanan wrote to Cornelia Roosevelt, “I am now ‘solitary and alone,’ having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone, and [I] should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.”[5]

After King died in 1853 Buchanan described him as “among the best, the purest and most consistent public men I have known.”[5] While some of their correspondence were destroyed by family members, the length and intimacy of surviving letters illustrate “the affection of a special friendship”.[8]

The 1852 Democratic National Convention was held at the 1851 Maryland Institute for the Promotion of the Mechanic Arts Hall in Baltimore. Franklin Pierce was nominated for President, and King was nominated for Vice President.

Pierce and King defeated the Whig candidates, Winfield Scott and William Alexander Graham. (While attending college, King and Graham had been members of rival campus organizations in Chapel Hill; King belonging to the Philanthropic Society and Graham to the Dialectic Society.) Because King was ill with tuberculosis and had traveled to Cuba in an effort to regain his health, he was not able to be in Washington to take his oath of office on March 4, 1853. By a Special Act of Congress, he was allowed to take the oath outside the United States, and was sworn in on March 24, 1853 near Matanzas, Cuba.[3][9][10]

Shortly afterward, King returned to Chestnut Hill, where he died within two days. He was interred in a vault on the plantation and later reburied in Selma’s Old Live Oak Cemetery.[11] King never carried out any duties of the office.[12] The U.S. Senate displays a bust of King in its collection, even though he never presided over a legislative session as Vice President.[13]

Following King’s death, the office of Vice President was vacant until John C. Breckinridge was inaugurated with President James Buchanan in March 1857.

Engraving of Chestnut Hill, published following King’s death in the Illustrated News, New York, April 30, 1853. The house burned during the 1920s.

Crypt of William R. King in Live Oak Cemetery, Selma, Alabama.

Read this article:

William R. King – Wikipedia

Fair Usage Law

December 21, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

All Pierce North Pedigrees

The information below was provided by the participant or his representative and may contain errors. Presentations vary depending on the information provided. It is recommended that you use the site’s search function to speed up locating the family of interest. Searches may include dates, a wife’s name, or places. First and last names can be searched together with quotation marks.

This page has been optimized for IE, Chrome and Safari web browsers. Firefox browser users should used another browser.

ID N59154 (Group A)1. William Pearce was born in 1878 in Bristol, England

2. Alfred Pearce was born in 1905 in Vermont, USA. He married Helen M. Rodgers (born 1907 in Vermont and died in 1973 in Vermont). He died in 1970 in Barre, Vermont.

ID N10900 (Group B)Oldest known ancestor Charles D. Pierce, born 1889 or1890 in New York, New York

ID 37767 (Group C)1. John Pierce b between 1707-1723 d. 1808 NY (This has not been totally proven, however looks possible)

2. Eliakim Pierce b ca 1770 MA d 4 Nov 1830 m. Mariam (UMN) b ca 1770 prob. MA, d 23 Feb 1822 NY

3. Daniel Addison Pierce b Sep 1789 MA d 19 Aug 1869 NY m. ca 1813 to Nancy (UMN) b 1788 CT d. 2 Feb 1865 NY

4. Abram Briggs Pierce b 16 Dec 1814 NY, m. before 1833 NY to Alice Ann McBurney b 1818 NY d 22 Jun 1866

5. Washington Irving Pierce b 17 Sep 1851 NY d 23 Nov 1930 MI m. 18 Mar 1873 NY to Lenora Almena Fairbanks b 17 Feb 1851 NY, d. 31 Jan 1927 MI

6. Wellington Irving Pierce b. 12 Nov 1880 Calhoun Co., MI d. 15 Feb 1965 Calhoun Co., MI, m. 4 Jul 1901 to Mary Pauline Miller b. 16 Jan 1886 Saginaw, MI, d. 5 Sep 1924 Jackson, Jackson, MI

7. Martin Irving Pierce b. 15 Dec 1912 Calhoun Co., MI, d. 11 Sep 1982 Kalamazoo, MI, m. 25 Jan 1933 Jackson, MI to Lois Julia Bordewick b 1 Jul 1915 Chicago, IL, d. 16 Jul 2001 Kalamazoo, MI

ID Sorenson 1 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce b. abt. 1615 in Hingham, Kent, England m. Persis Eames. d.March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI, fell in the Rehoboth battle

2. Benjamin Pierce b. 1646 and d. 1730, Scituate, Plymouth, MA. He m. (1) Martha Adams Feb. 05, 1677/78. She was d. James Adams. He m. (2) Elizabeth (Adams) Perry July 21, 1718 res. Scituate, Plymouth, MA

3. Thomas Pierce b. Nov. 14, 1692 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA and d. 1775 He m. Mary Booth Jan. 29, 1716/17 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA

4. Ezekial Pierce b. 1718 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA, bp. Dec. 4, 1720. He m. UNKNOWN

5. Ezekial Pierce b. abt. 1739 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA and d. in Scituate, Plymouth, MA He m. Martha Merritt May 01, 1755in Scituate, Plymouth, MA

6. Augustus Pierce bp. May 29, 1757, Scituate, Plymouth, served in Rev. War and last res. Conhocton, NY

7. Gardner Pierce b. Aug. 1799 Vermont

8. Harrison Gardner Pierce b. Mar. 1839 Loon Lake, New York

9. Harrison Gordon Pierce b. April 13, 1868 in New York

ID N29808 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce

2. Ephraim Pierce, Sr.

3. Ephraim Pierce, Jr.

4. Mial Pierce

5. Joshua Pierce

6. Shubel Pearce b. abt 1758 Rehoboth, Bristol Co., MA d. Jun 9, 1833, Hampton, Washington Co, NY m. Nov 5, 1778 MA to Abigail Mason b. abt 1760 Swansea, Bristol Co., MA d. Dec 17, 1842, Washington Co., NY

7. Jesse J. (Joshua?) Pearce b. abt 1898 Westfield, Washington Co, NY d. Feb 12, 1830, Washington Co, NY m. Unknown

8. Theodore S. (Shubel?) Pierce b. April 3, 1828 Hampton, Washington Co., NY d. abt 1893, Jefferson County, NE m. abt 1849 NY to Carolyn L. Potter b. Jun 11, 1832 NY or VT, d. Dec 25, 1891, NE

9. Theodore Seymore “Ted” Pierce b. Nov 10, 1854 d. Aug 26, 1924 in Moline, IL m. Jul 7, 1878 IL to Agatha Ann Harrison b. May 29, 1862 IL, d. Dec 1, 1939, IL

10. Homer Lawrence Pierce b. Mar 9, 1902 Jubilee Township, IL d. June 14, 1972 in Peoria, Peoria Co., IL m. Oct 4, 1930 to Mabel Maria Kent b. Jan 31, 1900 IL, d. Dec 18, 1990 IL

ID 75407 (Group C)1. Thomas Pierce b. about 1583 England. 1633-34 settled in Charlestown, Mass. m. Elizabeth ?? d. Oct 7, 1666.

2. Samuel Pierce b. about 1617 in England. m. Mary ??? d. Sept 1678 in Malden, Mass.

3. Jonathan Pierce b. 1661. m. Mary Lobdell Dec 4, 1683. d. July 4, 1722 Charlestown, Mass.

4. Stephen Pierce b. Jan 24 1705/06 Charlestown, Mass. m. Elizabeth Rand May 20, 1728 Charlestown, Mass. d. Sept 23, 1785.

5. Stephen Pierce b. April 5, 1729 Charlestown, Mass. m. Hannah Gullison Jan 3 1753 Charlestown, Mass. d. abt. Sept 1,1783 Stratford, Conn.

6. Samuel Pierce b. July 8, 1767 Middletown, Conn. m. Anne Joyce Sept 26, 1790 Middletown, Conn. d. Mar 25 1840 Greenfield, Mass.

7. George Pierce b. Sept 13, 1804 Greenfield, Mass. m. Olive Draper Wilson Dec 28, 1825 Greenfield, Mass. d. July 30, 1878 Deerfield, Mass.

8. George Pierce b. Mar 2, 1830 Northhampton, Mass. m. Catherine Lucy Scott Jan 13, 1851 Greenfield, Mass. d. Dec 14, 1915 Greenfield, Mass.

9. Doras Manton Pierce b. Dec 21, 1867 Greenfield, Mass. m. Lena Ladelle Wilde Jun 10 1890 Ashfield, Mass. d. Jun 28 1937 Winthrop, Mass.

10. Lewis Benjamin Pierce b. Sept. 20, 1896 Somerville, Mass. m. Ilene Chase Peaslee Dec 17, 1895 Wiscasset, Maine. d. Nov. 26, 1975 Boston, Mass.

ID 78848 (Group C)1. Thomas Pierce 1583/84 England. m. Elizabeth Carew 1606 Woburn, Mass. d. Oct 7, 1666 Woburn or Charlestown, Mass.

2. Thomas Pierce b. 1617/1620 Norwick, Northfolk, England. m. Elizabeth Cole May 6, 1635 Boston, Mass. d. Nov. 6, 1683 Woburn, Mass.

3. Thomas Pierce b. Jun 21 1645 Charlestown, Mass. m. Eliza d. Dec 8 1717 Woburn, Mass.

4. Thomas Pierce b. Feb 12 1670 Woburn, Mass. m. Mary Wyman Feb 27 1692 d. Jun 14 1705 Plainfield, Conn.

5. Thomas Pierce b. Oct 10 1696 Woburn, Mass. d. June 15, 1762 Plainfield, Conn.

6. John Pierce b. Feb 10 1724. m. Zerviah Spaulding Dec 24 1750 d. Sept 24 1780 Plainfield, Conn.

7. Spalding Pierce b. Feb 29 1768 Plainfield, Conn. m. Abigail Bacon April 18 1799 Paris, New York. d. Feb 14 1827 Rodman, New York.

8. Sylvester Phineas Pierce b. Sept 19, 1814 Sauquoit, New York. m. Cornelia Maria Marsh Nov 18 1841. d. Nov 5, 1893 Syracuse, New York.

9. Marsh Curtis Pierce b. Feb 19, 1847 Syracuse, New York. m. Jennie M. Cook Nov 7 1872. d. July 3 1902

10. Harry Cook Pierce b. Oct 8 1873 Syracuse, New York. m. Harriet Bennett Spencer Jan 1 1903. d. April 5 1924 Syracuse, New York.

ID 85006 (Group C)1. Ephraim Percy born 1751 died 1822 Chateaugay, Franklin County, New York. Will probated 22 April 1822, Wife Sarah born 1755.Eleven children:#1 Ephraim dob 1774 married Patty dod 1834 Chateaugay, Franklin County, NY buried Brayton Hollow Cemetery, Chateaugay, NY#2 John dob 1776 married Hannah Arnold#3 Samuel dob 1779 married ??? remarried to Hannah Arnold Percy dod 27Sept 1856 Chaeteaugay, Franklin County, NY Brayton Hollow Cemetery, Cheateaugay, NY remarried Laura#4 Rebecca dob 1781 spouse Cashey#5 Elizabeth dob 1782 spouse Eliot#6 Robert dob 1783 married Jane Gray dod 7 june 1841 remarried Elizabeth#7 Abraham dob 1785#8 Jemima dob 1787 married Hodges#9 David Simeon dob 1791 married Julianna Derby#10 Garrett dob 4 oct 1795 Florida, Montgomery county, NY married 21 Jan1827 Chateaugay, NY spouse Eunice McDonald dod 4 Feb 1866 Chateaugay, NYBrayton Hollow Cemetary, Chateaugay#11 James dob 1797 dod 20 April 1861 married Sarah A. Bush

2. John Percy and wife Hannah Arnold

3. Charles Percy and wife Sarah

4. Hiram Percy and wife Clarissa

5. Lewis Addison Percy and wife Ethel Hinks

ID 87049 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Peirse b. abt 1615 England d. in King Philips War on 26 Mar 1676 Rehoboth, MA at Pawtucket-Attleboro Gore. m. 1st abt 1644 Scituate, Plymouth, MA Persis Eames bp 28 Oct 1621, Fordington, St. George, Dorsetshire, England, dau. of Anthony Eames and Margery surname unknown. 13 children; 3 boys, 10 girls. m. 2nd about 1663, Anna surname unknown b. 1605 Kent, England, widow of John Allen. No children.

2. John Peirce b. 1659 Scituate, Plymouth, MA. d. 8 Sep 1750 Swansea, Bristol Co., MA. m. on 12 Dec 1683 Scituate, Patience Dodson, dau. of Anthony Dodson and Mary Williams of Scituate, MA. Both buried at Swansea in Pierce family cemetery, ages 91 and 74 respectively. 9 children; 6 boys, 3 girls.

3. John Peirce b. 12 Apr 1686 Scituate, Plymouth, MA, d. bet 1765/1766. m. on 26 Dec 1712 Scituate Abigail Vinton, dau. of Blaise Vinton and Lydia Hayden of Lynne and Scituate, MA. 9 children; 3 boys, 4 girls, 1 unknown died young.

4. Elisha Peirce b. abt 1715 Scituate, Plymouth, MA. d. aft 1765 Taunton, Bristol Co., MA. m. 5 July 1744 Dighton, Bristol Co., Ma, Sibel Perry b 1729 Dighton, dau. of William and Mary Perry. Total number of children unknown.

5. Elisha Peirce b. 1746 Taunton, Bristol Co., MA d. 7 Jul 1839 Taunton. m. 1785/6 Elizabeth Keene. Both buried Taunton, Bristol Co., MA ages 93 and 92 respectively. 12 children; 4 boys, 8 girls.

6. Eliphalet Pierce b. 3 Jun 1782 Dighton, Bristol Co., MA. d. 1840/50 Athens, Menard Co., IL m. 3 Apr 1804 Annis McMichel, b. 12 July 1785, dau. of Robert McMichel and Sarah Comins of Palmer, Hampden Co., MA. 4 children; 2 boys, 2 girls.

7. Hollom Pierce b. 26 Sep 1805 New York. d. 2 Nov 1859 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL. m. abt 1834 New York Lucena Winters, dau. of Nathan Winters and Grace Kelsey of New York and Vermont. 11 children; 5 boys, 4 girls, twins died young.

8. Sherman Nathan Pierce b. 29 Aug 1836 Tuna, Cattaraugus Co., NY. d. 24 Aug 1925 Marion, Marion Co., KS. m. on 1 Jan 1860 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL Sarah Ann Boughan dau. of Berryman Boughan and Bathsheba Hedrick of Logan Co., IL. 12 children; 4 boys and 7 girls. 1 boy, 1 girl, 1 infant died young.

9. Charles Edwin Pierce b. 14 Jan 1863 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL. d. 21 Mar 1947 Marion, Marion Co., KS. m. 10 Dec 1888 at Marion Co., KS Christiane Marie Lisette Baker dau. of George Christoph Gottfried Baker and Christiane Marie Awick of Waverly, Pike Co., OH. 8 children; 5 boys and 3 girls.

10. Elmer Edwin Pierce b. 24 Jun 1904 Marion, Marion Co., KS. d. 28 Sep 1937 Topeka, Shawnee Co., KS. m. on 2 May 1930 Wichita, Sedgwick Co., KS Maxine Louise Bailey, dau. of Henry E. Bailey and Maude M. Sadil. Children: 2 boys.

ID N50840 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce, b. abt. 1615, m. ?. m. 2nd, Annah James. Res.Hingham and Scituate, Mass. He was killed by Indians Sunday, Mar. 26, 1676.

2. Ephraim Pierce m. Hannah Holbrook. He moved to Warwick R.I., from Weymoth, Mass. where his first child was born. Will dated July 18, 1718 and was proved in Warwick, Sept. 23, 1719. He d. Sept. 14, 1719.

3. Azrikim Pierce b. Jan. 4, 1671, m. Dec. 31, 1696 Sarah Heywood or Howard. m. 2nd, May 6, 1713, Elizabeth Esten. Res. Warwick R.I. and moved to Rehoboth, Mass. before 1721.

4. Joseph Pierce b. April 7, 1714. m. Oct. 3, 1734, Mary Martin. He died May 5, 1787. His will was proved Jan. 5, 1787. Res. Rehoboth, Mass.

5. Nathaniel Pierce b. July 9, 1735. m. June 24, 1756, Sarah Pierce. m. 2nd, ?. He died Feb. 26, 1821. Res. Rehoboth, Mass.

6. Aaron Pierce b. Sept. 20, 1765. m. Nov. 14, 1793, Elipha Bliss. m. 2nd, Jan. 23, 1800, Nancy Rounds. He died in 1831. Res. Rehoboth, Mass.

7. Barnard W. Pierce b. Sept. 11, 1810. m. Oct. 29, 1835, Martha H. Smith. m. 2nd, Oct. 1855, Esther Arnold. Res. Westerly, R.I.

8. Edgar B. Pierce b. Oct. 10, 1842. m. Nov. 1865, Eliza R. Smith. m. 2nd, June 23, 1873, Gertrude M. Smith. Res. New London, Conn.

9. Courtland B. Pierce b. March 4, 1885.

ID 88434 (Group C) – This pedigree from Pierce Genealogy by Frederick Clifton Pierce1. Ephraim Percy, Sr. b. 1743 in Mohawktown, NY d bef Apr 22, 1822 when his will was probated at Chateaugay, NY. He was married bef 1782 to Sarah, surname unknown.

2. Robert Percy, b. Oct 7, 1782 Florida Township, Franklin, NY d. Jun 7, 1841 at Cape Vincent, NY. He m. Elizabeth Vaughn after the death of his first wife. Elizabeth died Dec 12, 1859 at Cape Vincent, NY. Robert and Elizabeth Vaughn had five children including David Frederick.

3. David Frederick Percy b Apr 17, 1819 Wolfe Island, Ontario, Canada. d. Feb 13 1865 at Cape Vincent, NY. m. Abigail Woodman Mar 3, 1841 at Pamelia, NY. Abigail died Jul 19, 1864 on Wolfe Island.

4. Benson Alexander Percy b. Jan 1, 1861, Cape Vincent, NY d. Feb 23, 1931 Sterlingville, NY After the death of his first wife he m. (2nd) Cecilia Mary Gegoux Dec 28, 1890 Clayton County, NY. Cecilia d May 7, 1933 in Watertown, NY.

5. Ray Sidney Percy, b. Jan 3, 1893 in Clayton, NY d. May 8, 1933 Sterlingville, NY. m. Jun 4, 1918 in Aldrige Settlement, NY to Lucy May O’Connell. Lucy d. Feb 26, 1981 in Cicero, NY.

ID 118177 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce was born 1615 in England. He married Persis Eames in 1645 in Hingham, MA. He died March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI.

2. Eprhaim Pierce, Sr. was born in 1647 in Scituate, MA. He married Hannah Holbrook in 1670 in MA. He died April 29, 1719 in Warwick, RI.

3. Ephraim Pierce, Jr. was born in 1674 in Warwick RI. He married Mary Low about 1693 in Swansea, MA. He died in Rehoboth, MA.

4. Dea. Mial Pierce was born April 24, 1692 or 3 in Swansea or Rehoboth, MA. He married Judith Rounds Ellis about 1717. He died Oct. 18, 1786 in Rehoboth, MA.

5. Lt. Job Pierce Sr. was born April 25, 1723 in Rehoboth MA. He married in the 1750s Abigail Pratt. He died Oct 4 or 6, 1791 in Rehoboth, MA.

6. Job Pierce Jr. was born Aug. 7, 1753 in Rehoboth, MA. He married Hannah Bullock Dec. 29, 1776. He died Aug. 30, 1818 in Rehoboth, MA.

7. Benoni Pierce was born Oct. 21, 1781 in Rehoboth, MA. He married Elizabeth Davis Jan 1, 1805 in NY or MA. He died June 26, 1855 in Blenheim Hill, NY.

8. Lemuel Davis Pierce was born April 9, 1810 in Gilboa, NY. He married Lydia Ruliffson April 28, 1836 in New York. He died Dec. 19, 1898 in Balaton, MN.

9. Charles William Pierce was born March 25, 1842 in N. Blenheim NY. He married Zoa Catherine van Deusen Feb. 29, 1868 in Green Lake Co., WI. He died Feb. 18, 1914 in Minneapolis, MN.

10. Frank Joseph Pierce was born June 21, 1875 in Guttenberg, IA. He married Eloda J. Sigurdson May 17, 1897 in Marshall, MN. He died Nov. 17, 1953 in Minneapolis, MN. She died July 27, 1904 and their children were orphaned.

11. Wesley Eugene Foster was born April 30, 1901 in Marshall, MN to Frank Pierce. He was adopted by J.J. Foster in MN as a young child. Wesley married Lenora Ruth Walter in 1938 or 1939, likely in Souix Falls, SD. He died January 22, 1974 in Pontiac, MI.

ID 140847 (Group C)1. CAPTAIN MICHAEL PIERCE was born 1615 in England. He married PERSIS EAMES in 1645 in Hingham, MA. He died March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI.

2. EPHRAIM PIERCE SR. was born 1646 in Hingham, Massachusetts, and died September 1719 in Warwick, Rhode Island. He married HANNAH HOLBROOK. She was born 1648 in Weymouth, Massachusetts, and died 1719 in Warwick, Massachusetts.

3. EPHRAIM PIERCE JR. was born 1674 in Higham, Massachusetts, and died 1772 in Glouster, Rhode Island. He married MARY LOW. She was born 1677 in Swansea, Bristol MAssachusetts, and died Bef. 1772 in Glouster, Rhode Island.

4. MIAL PIERCE was born April 25, 1693 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died October 18, 1786 in Rehoboth, Bristol, MAssachusetts. He married JUDITH ROUND. She was born 1687 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died October 06, 1744 in Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts.

5. JOSHUA PIERCE was born 1728 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died 1785 in Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts. He married MARY NORTON. She was born 1727 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died 1791 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts.

Follow this link:

All Pierce North Pedigrees

Fair Usage Law

December 12, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Thoughts On The Holocaust by Dr. William Luther Pierce – youtube.com

WLP school for lemmings.

“Cattle die, and kinsmen die, and so must one die oneself.But there is one thing I know which never dies,and that isthe fame of a dead man’s deeds.” –Old Norse Proverb

https://archive.org/details/DrWilliam…

The Nordic Resistance MovementSWE: https://www.nordfront.se/NOR: https://www.frihetskamp.net/FIN: http://www.patriootti.com/DEN: http://www.nordfront.dk/

Read the original post:

Thoughts On The Holocaust by Dr. William Luther Pierce – youtube.com

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William Luther Pierce – Internet Archive

1990s[edit]

1990[edit]

We must reach out to our people. We must alert them. We must educate them. We must encourage them. We must inspire them. And here’s a beautiful, wonderful thing: when you reach out to other people to encourage them and inspire them, you yourself will be encouraged and inspired. When you find out how many other people there are who share our concerns, our feelings, our values, our sense of responsibility, you cannot help but be encouraged. Even the hatred that you encounter from some people — especially from people in the controlled media — will be encouraging. For you will understand that they would not hate us so much if they did not fear us. And the reason that they fear us is that deep inside them they know that what we say is true. So let’s get out there — all of us — and start looking for encouragement!

The Big Picture, 1996[1]

You who are reading this are at least partially awake. You are a cut above Joe and Jill Sixpack. So I say to you: think about what you are doing with your life. Think about the responsibility you have to your children and grandchildren and great grandchildren. Think about the responsibility you have to all of those who came before you and whose sacrifices made your life possible. And think about your responsibility to yourself, your responsibility to be the best person, the most righteous person, that you can be. Think about all of these things, and then let me hear from you.

– Time To Do What’s Right, 1997[2]

The people are being kept in line at the moment, because there are still lots of shiny new things for them to buy. But more and more Americans are beginning to look beyond their immediate material comfort and to worry about the long-term moral slide of their country. If the economy slips badly, there will be hell to pay. More and more people will listen to the dissidents. A big problem for the Jews is how to silence the dissidents now, how to stifle the people who are asking inconvenient questions and thinking dangerous thoughts, before these thoughts spread to other people. They’ve tried to do it with legislation, but the country isn’t yet in a mood to be told what it can think. What the Jews need is a nice, big war. Then they can crack down on the dissidents. Then they can call us “subversives.” Then they can call us “unpatriotic,” because we will be against their war… That’s why I am convinced that there will be a strong effort to involve America in another major war during the next four years. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. While the warmongers are scheming for war, they will tell us how much they want peace. They’re good at that sort of thing. They’ve had a lot of practice. But they will be scheming for war, believe me, no matter what they say. And when that war comes, remember what you have read today.

Get Set for War, 1997.

The New World Order schemers are absolutely determined to have their way. They have been able to go a long way toward their goal by using subterfuge and deceit. But ultimately the transformation of a world of independent nations into the global plantation they are aiming at will involve changes so profound and so traumatic that subterfuge and deceit will not be enough to keep the serfs under control. They will need raw police power, applied KGB style. They want to begin developing that power now. They’re a pretty bold and arrogant bunch of schemers, but they understand that according to the old way of looking at things — according to our way — they are traitors. They understand that if the general public ever gets a real inkling of what they are up to, if they ever lose their grip on the situation, they’ll all end up hanging from lampposts. What they are planning is so monstrous, so evil, that the thought of being brought to account for it frightens them. They want to use every means at their disposal to make sure their plan succeeds. And, my friends, we will resort to every means at our disposal to insure that their scheme does not succeed and that they do indeed end up hanging from lampposts.

The New World Order, 1997.

You know, the media and the politicians would have us believe that there’s something inherently immoral about terrorism. That is, they would have us believe that it’s not immoral for us to destroy a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan with cruise missiles, but it is immoral for someone like Bin Laden to blow up a government building in Washington with a truck bomb. It’s okay for us to take out an air-raid shelter full of women and children in Baghdad with a smart bomb, but it’s cowardly and immoral for an Iraqi or Iranian agent to pop a vial of sarin in a New York subway tunnel. Really, what should we expect? They don’t have aircraft carriers and cruise missiles and stealth bombers. So should we expect them to just sit there and take their punishment when we wage war on them? I think that it is the most reasonable thing in the world for them to hit back at us in the only way they can. It actually takes more courage to be a terrorist behind enemy lines than it does to push the firing button for a cruise missile a hundred miles away from your target. And yet we certainly will see Bill Clinton and every other Jew-serving politician in our government on television denouncing as a “cowardly act” the first terrorist bomb which goes off in the United States as a result of a war against Iraq. And don’t be surprised when the FBI and the CIA announce that they have studied the evidence carefully and have determined that it was Iranian terrorists who built the bomb, so that the Jews will have an excuse for expanding the war to take out Iran as well as Iraq.

Why War? (November 21, 1998), American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 21, 1998

If we’re going to consider failure to comply with UN directives a good reason for wrecking a country with cruise missiles, hey, I can think of a country in the Middle East which is in violation of a lot more UN directives than Iraq is. Israel has consistently thumbed its nose at UN directives, and no one in Washington has ever told Israel, “Comply or get hit.” Let’s understand one fundamental fact. This crusade against Iraq isn’t about the United Nations or international security or stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It’s about making the Middle East safe for Israel to continue bullying its neighbors and stealing from them. Every other explanation is lies and hypocrisy. And we really can expect a bigger dose of lies and hypocrisy than usual as the warmongers work to get this war against Iraq started. The media bosses will trot more generals and politicians in front of the TV cameras and have them bluster patriotically about how we’re not going to let Saddam Hussein get away with it any longer, by god, and they’ll show groups of military personnel cheering when they’re told that they’re being shipped out to the Persian Gulf to kick Saddam Hussein’s behind and keep him from getting away with whatever it is he’s getting away with, which mainly seems to be running his country the way he wants to instead of the way the United Nations tells him. They will work overtime at convincing the couch potatoes and the mindless yahoos who like to wave flags and shout patriotic slogans that destroying Iraq really is an act of American patriotism. And as long as the number of Americans killed in a Jewish war against Iraq remains small, the flag-waving yahoos and the bought politicians ought to be able to drown out any dissent from Americans like me who believe that we don’t have any reasonable justification for waging such a war. And keeping casualties small ought to be easy, so long as it remains strictly a high-tech war, with us launching missiles against defenseless targets from many miles away. Of course, sometimes wars get out of hand, and unexpected things happen. If the Jews manage to get Iran involved in the war also — and that’s what they really want to do, what they really need to do — then I think we stand a pretty good chance of seeing some major terrorist activity in the United States. I know that if I were Osama bin Laden, I’d have been spending my time getting ready for just such a development ever since Bill Clinton blew up that pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. I’d be putting my teams into place in the United States, assembling materials, choosing targets, and waiting for the Jews to provide justification for me to begin killing Americans on a significant scale. Of course, whether Osama bin Laden is as resourceful and as capable as he’s said to be remains to be seen. Personally, I have very little faith in the ability of these flea-bitten Muslims to get things done. But we’ll see.

Why War? (November 21, 1998), American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 21, 1998.

Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote. Why is that? Why can’t the Indonesians have an Islamic theocracy if they want? Why can’t the Pakistanis have a military dictatorship? Why can’t the Serbs run their own country the way they prefer? What is the appeal in making sure that people whose minds have been wasted by Alzheimer’s Disease vote? Well, let’s not beat around the bush: the appeal of mass democracy lies in the fact that in essentially every country in the world today, the number of persons unable to think for themselves is substantially larger than the number able to make independent decisions. Those unable to think for themselves have their thinking done for them by the people who control the mass media. Which is to say, democracy is the preferred system because it gives the political power to those who own or control the mass media and at the same time allows them to remain behind the scenes and evade responsibility for the way in which they use that power. And the more inclusive the democracy is — that is, the more Alzheimer’s sufferers and Mongoloid cretinsand paranoid schizophrenics and people who live in empty packing cases in alley ways and Jamaican immigrants and football fans are able to vote — the more certain is the grip of the media masters on the political process. Those voters who buy astrology magazines at the checkout stand and spend their time watching soap operas, game shows, and Oprah absorb their general attitudes on things through the television screen. They learn which ideas are fashionable and which are not by noticing the facial expression and tone of voice of Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather when the news is announced each day. Their opinions on specific issues are formed as they view televised sidewalk surveys taken by reporters. The only uncertainty about these people is whether or not they’ll be able to pryt hemselves loose from their couches long enough to vote for the designated candidates. That’s why it’s important to have lots of them. And wherever there are lots of them, the men who control the mass media also will control the outcome of elections. It’s a much surer way of controlling governments than bribing corrupt dictators or slipping seductive whores into the king’s bedroom a la Esther and Ahasuerus — or Monica and Bill. Believe me, one day soon the Jews on both sides of the great water will institute a web-TV voting system that allows the couch potatoes and the ball game fans to vote without having to getup from their couches, just by clicking their remote controls at their TV screens to select the next President or prime minister. That will be real democracy.

The New Protocols, 1999.

This trendy, new crowd, which likes to do everything with committees, really believes that all it takes to make anything legal and OK is a majority. I guess they call that democracy. When the majority is what it has become in the United States today, a better name is mobocracy. But really, it’s much worse than mob rule. It is rule by a self-appointed elite of utterly evil and destructive people who have in their hands the tools for controlling and guiding the mob. They’re pretty cocky now — so cocky, in fact, that they’re making statements of the sort I’ve quoted today. They’re cocky because they believe that no one can take away from them their tools for controlling the mob, and that as time passes and America becomes darker and more degenerate, their grip on the mob will only become firmer. Our job is to prove them wrong. It’s a big job, and we’d better get started.

The New World Order, 1999.

Other people tell me that whatever solution we seek to the problems our people are facing today must be a solution without violence. And my response to that is that I am a peaceful man. All my adult life I have been a scholar and a teacher, never a man of violence. But look at the behavior of our opponents! All they know is violence and coercion and murder. I do not want violence, and I am determined to avoid it as long as I can.

Our Revolutionary Right, 1999.

People tell me, “Oh, you must not advocate doing anything illegal.” My answer to them is that I have been a law-abiding man all my life. I believe in law and order. I believe that we must have a society governed strictly by laws, not by mobs or by any tyrant’s whims of the moment — or by any clever tribe of alien manipulators who have gained control of our mass media. But does anyone really believe that we have a society governed by laws today? Let us remember that we are living now in the era of O.J. Simpson and Bill Clinton. We have laws on the books, and we have police and courts which have the theoretical responsibility for enforcing those laws. And when it is Politically Correct to do so, they will.

Our Revolutionary Right, 1999.

From my viewpoint it’s the Clinton gang who are the outlaws, the violators of our Constitution and of all of our old-fashioned legal and moral principles, and anything that we do to oppose them is legal and is morally justified. Anyone who goes along with them is a traitor, in the strict, old-fashioned sense of the word, and anyone who sits on his hands now and refuses to oppose the Clinton gang is not much better.

The New World Order, 1999.

The only reason that a rabble of feminists and queers and Jews and Blacks and mestizos and liberals and Clinton supporters are running America into the ground today is that decent people are sitting on their hands. If the decent people in America would get off their hands and accept personal responsibility for what is being done to their world, and if they would make a commitment and begin working together, we could sweep the whole Clinton coalition into the dustbin of history. It doesn’t matter that the Clinton rabble outnumber us. We will whip them in a minute. We will have the media bosses jumping into the ocean all along the East Coast and swimming toward Israel as fast as they can go. But first we must be willing to accept personal responsibility. And so my message today to every decent person who is listening is this: Don’t be a shirker. Don’t try to be a smart guy by continuing to cheer from the sidelines but refusing to join the team and get out on the field. Stand up and become a participant in life. Make of your life a model that people will remember and talk about long after you’re gone. – Thoughts on Accepting Responsibility, 1999[3]

Bill Clinton said in his Portland State University speech that anyone who doesn’t want America to become darker is “un-American.” Isn’t that something? This jerk who used to organize anti-American demonstrations during the Vietnam war and chant, “Ho, Ho, Ho Chih Minh, the Viet Cong’s gonna win,” is now telling us that we’re “un-American”!

Thinking About a White Future, 1998[4]

2000s[edit]

2001[edit]

In 1918 Hitler was in a military hospital blinded from a British poison gas attack. He was just a corporal, he had no family, a limited education, no friends, no connections, no political status, nothing. He decides that he will lead Germany in redressing the grievous wrongs that had been done to it after the First World War and straightening out some of the mistakes that were being made in German society. And fifteen years later he is Chancellor of Germany and he did what he said he was going to do. A wounded war veteran with nobody to help him, and he pulled it up just through his own willpower. That is an amazing story. – The Fame of a Dead Man’s deeds, 2001[5]

2002[edit]

These days, to be “patriotic” means to wave the flag and shout slogans whenever the mass media deem it appropriate. It means to cheer the government whenever the government decides to use its cruise missiles or its smart bombs to kill a bunch of people in some other country, regardless of the reason. Instead of blood-based patriotism, today we have government-based patriotism. If you wave the flag and support the government, you’re a patriot. If you don’t like what the government is doing and you say so, then all of the flag-waving, slogan-shouting yahoos look at you as if you were the enemy.

The New Patriotism, 2002

Cattle die,kinsmen dieyou yourself die;I know one thingwhich never dies:the judgment of a dead man’s life.

View original post here:

William Luther Pierce – Internet Archive

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

The Best of Dr. William Pierce – Renegade Tribune

Shame that we still have these same self-hating delusional whites even years later with all the obvious signs that we are being genocided. A great deal of whites, especially in America and Western Europe, are lead by their feelings and blinded by Jewish Marxist propaganda. While there are a number of whites who are waking up and fighting out genocide, I am still shocked at the SJW and nonsense about were all the same or Theyre trying to conquer and divide humanity If I give whites the facts and information, its up to them to come toRead more

Vote Up1Vote Down Reply

See original here:

The Best of Dr. William Pierce – Renegade Tribune

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945: William L. Pierce …

‘).appendTo(flyout.elem());var panelGroup=flyout.getName()+’SubCats’;var hideTimeout=null;var sloppyTrigger=createSloppyTrigger($parent);var showParent=function(){if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;} if(visible){return;} var height=$(‘#nav-flyout-shopAll’).height(); $parent.css({‘height’: height});$parent.animate({width:’show’},{duration:200,complete:function(){$parent.css({overflow:’visible’});}});visible=true;};var hideParentNow=function(){$parent.stop().css({overflow:’hidden’,display:’none’,width:’auto’,height:’auto’});panels.hideAll({group:panelGroup});visible=false;if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;}};var hideParent=function(){if(!visible){return;} if(hideTimeout){clearTimeout(hideTimeout);hideTimeout=null;} hideTimeout=setTimeout(hideParentNow,10);};flyout.onHide(function(){sloppyTrigger.disable();hideParentNow();this.elem().hide();});var addPanel=function($link,panelKey){var panel=dataPanel({className:’nav-subcat’,dataKey:panelKey,groups:[panelGroup],spinner:false,visible:false});if(!flyoutDebug){var mouseout=mouseOutUtility();mouseout.add(flyout.elem());mouseout.action(function(){panel.hide();});mouseout.enable();} var a11y=a11yHandler({link:$link,onEscape:function(){panel.hide();$link.focus();}});var logPanelInteraction=function(promoID,wlTriggers){var logNow=$F.once().on(function(){var panelEvent=$.extend({},event,{id:promoID});if(config.browsePromos&&!!config.browsePromos[promoID]){panelEvent.bp=1;} logEvent(panelEvent);phoneHome.trigger(wlTriggers);});if(panel.isVisible()&&panel.hasInteracted()){logNow();}else{panel.onInteract(logNow);}};panel.onData(function(data){renderPromo(data.promoID,panel.elem());logPanelInteraction(data.promoID,data.wlTriggers);});panel.onShow(function(){var columnCount=$(‘.nav-column’,panel.elem()).length;panel.elem().addClass(‘nav-colcount-‘+columnCount);showParent();var $subCatLinks=$(‘.nav-subcat-links > a’,panel.elem());var length=$subCatLinks.length;if(length> 0){var firstElementLeftPos=$subCatLinks.eq(0).offset().left;for(var i=1;i’+ catTitle+”);panel.elem().prepend($subPanelTitle);}} $link.addClass(‘nav-active’);});panel.onHide(function(){$link.removeClass(‘nav-active’);hideParent();a11y.disable();sloppyTrigger.disable();});panel.onShow(function(){a11y.elems($(‘a, area’,panel.elem()));});sloppyTrigger.register($link,panel);if(flyoutDebug){$link.click(function(){if(panel.isVisible()){panel.hide();}else{panel.show();}});} var panelKeyHandler=onKey($link,function(){if(this.isEnter()||this.isSpace()){panel.show();}},’keydown’,false);$link.focus(function(){panelKeyHandler.bind();}).blur(function(){panelKeyHandler.unbind();});panel.elem().appendTo($parent);};var hideParentAndResetTrigger=function(){hideParent();sloppyTrigger.disable();};for(var i=0;i Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. Flip to back Flip to front

Fair Usage Law

May 15, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Franklin Pierce | Biography & Facts | Britannica.com

Franklin Pierce, byname Young Hickory, (born November 23, 1804, Hillsboro, New Hampshire, U.S.died October 8, 1869, Concord, New Hampshire), 14th president of the United States (185357). He failed to deal effectively with the corroding sectional controversy over slavery in the decade preceding the American Civil War (186165). (For a discussion of the history and nature of the presidency, see presidency of the United States of America.) The son of a governor of New Hampshire, Benjamin Pierce, and the former Anna Kendrick, Franklin Pierce attended Bowdoin College in Maine, studied law in Northampton, Massachusetts, and was admitted to the bar in 1827. He married Jane Means Appleton, whose father was president of Bowdoin, in 1834. Pierce entered political life in New Hampshire as a Democrat, serving in the state legislature (182933), the U.S. House of Representatives (183337), and the Senate (183742). Handsome, affable, charming, and possessed of a certain superficial brilliance, Pierce made many friends in Congress, but his career there was otherwise undistinguished. He was a devoted supporter of Pres. Andrew Jackson but was continually overshadowed by older and more prominent men on the national scene. Resigning from the Senate for personal reasons, he returned to Concord, where he resumed his law practice and also served as federal district attorney. Except for a brief stint as an officer in the Mexican-American War (184648), Pierce remained out of the public eye until the nominating convention of the Democratic Party in 1852. After a deadlock developed among supporters of the leading presidential contendersLewis Cass, Stephen A. Douglas, and James Buchanana coalition of New England and Southern delegates proposed Young Hickory (a reference to Andrew Jackson, who had been known as Old Hickory), and Pierce was nominated on the 49th ballot. The ensuing presidential campaign was dominated by the controversy over slavery and the finality of the Compromise of 1850. Although both the Democrats and the Whigs declared themselves in favour of the compromise, the Democrats were more thoroughly united in their support. As a result, Pierce, who was almost unknown nationally, unexpectedly won the November election, defeating the Whig candidate Winfield Scott by 254 votes to 42 in the electoral college. Pierces triumph was quickly marred by tragedy, however, when, a few weeks before his inauguration, he and his wife witnessed the death of their only surviving child, 11-year-old Bennie, in a railroad accident. Jane Pierce, who had always opposed her husbands candidacy, never fully recovered from the shock. At the time of his election, Pierce, age 47, was the youngest man to have been elected to the presidency. Representing the Eastern element of the Democratic Party, which was inclined for the sake of harmony and business prosperity to oppose antislavery agitation and generally to placate Southern opinion, Pierce tried to promote sectional unity by filling his cabinet with extremists from both sides of the slavery debate. He also attempted to sidestep the fierce sectional antagonisms of the domestic scene by ambitiously and aggressively promoting the extension of U.S. territorial and commercial interests abroad. In an effort to buy the island of Cuba from Spain, he ordered the U.S. minister to Spain, Pierre Soul, to try to secure the influence of European financiers on the Spanish government. The resulting diplomatic statement, the Ostend Manifesto (October 1854), was interpreted by the American public as a call to wrest Cuba from Spain by force if necessary. The ensuing controversy forced the administration to disclaim responsibility for the document and to recall Soul. In 1855 an American adventurer, William Walker, conducted a notorious expedition into Central America with the hope of establishing a proslavery government under the control of the United States. In Nicaragua he established himself as military dictactor and then as president, and his dubious regime was recognized by the Pierce administration. A more lasting diplomatic achievement came from the expedition that Pres. Millard Fillmore had sent to Japan in 1853 under Commodore Matthew C. Perry. In 1854 Pierce received Perrys report that his expedition had been successful and that U.S. ships would have limited access to Japanese ports. The Pierce administration also reorganized the diplomatic and consular service and created the United States Court of Claims. Among Pierces domestic policies were preparations for a transcontinental railroad and the opening of the Northwest for settlement. In 1853, in order to create a southerly route to California, the U.S. minister to Mexico, James Gadsden, negotiated the purchase of almost 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory (the Gadsden Purchase), for $10 million. Mainly to stimulate migration to the Northwest and to facilitate the construction of a central route to the Pacific, Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. This measure, which opened two new territories for settlement, included repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 (by which slavery in the territories was prohibited north of latitude 36 30) and provided that the status of the territories as free or slave would be decided by popular sovereignty. The indignation aroused by the act and the resulting period of violent conflict in the Kansas Territory were the main causes of the rise of the Republican Party in the mid-1850s. Owing to his ineptness in handling the situation in Kansas, Pierce was denied renomination by the Democrats, and he remains the only president to be so repudiated by his party. After an extended tour of Europe he retired to Concord. Always a heavy drinker, Pierce descended further into apparent alcoholism, and he died in obscurity. The table provides a list of cabinet members in the administration of President Franklin Pierce.

Fair Usage Law

April 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Dr William Luther Pierce – Hunter Pdf 2018 – iswhere.org

William Luther Pierce – Wikipedia Hunter. Height, 193 cm (6 ft 4 in). Children, 2. Parent(s), William Luther Pierce Jr. Marguerite Farrell. William Luther Pierce III (September 11, 1933 July 23, 2002) was an American white ….. Print/export. Create a book Download as PDF Printable version…en.wikipedia.org William Pierce, America’s most important neo-Nazi for some three decades until his death in … William Luther Pierce’s bigoted attitudes toward people of color were …. his second novel, Hunter, depicting the assassination of interracial couples,…www.splcenter.org

Fair Usage Law

December 28, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William Pierce | National Vanguard

Exposing the Warmongering Jewish Senator Charlie Schumer and Israels Benjamin Netanyahuby Dr. William L. PierceEVERY EVENING when I have turned on the television news during the past few weeks, the message has had the same theme: Saddam Hussein must be stopped! Saddam Hussein is a danger to America! We must destroy William Pierce supervising a construction project at his facility in West Virginia.by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryNOW WE arrive at what may the most controversial and explosive chapter in Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds, read this week by Vanessa Neubauer by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryTHIS WEEK Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds read this week by Vanessa Neubauer in our continuing audio book series deals with Dr. William Luther Pierces views on the watershed event of the last 100 years: Assemblyman Dov HikindIN OUR WEEKLY DISCUSSIONS here I sometimes use careless language which leads to misunderstanding, and when I do Im sorry for it. The problem is that I really have a great deal of work to do, and I usually dont have time to refine and polish my remarks before I go on the William Gayley Simpson, author of Which Way Western Man?by Bradford L. HuieforThe American MercuryCHAPTER 20 of Robert GriffinsThe Fame of a Dead Mans Deeds read this week by Vanessa Neubauer in our continuing series deals with Dr. William Luther Pierce and his by Dr. William L. PierceQ: With what single aim should members of the Cosmotheist Community shape their institutions and shape their society?A: Their single aim should be service of the Creators Purpose. Every other thing which they may consider desirable in their society justice, by Dr. William L. PierceSOME OF MY LISTENERS tell me that I talk too much about the Jews, that I blame them for too many things, that the Jews arent the only ones to be blamed for the wrecking of our civilization and our culture, that there are many Jews who arent involved in destructive activities, by Dr. William L. PierceA LISTENER SENT ME a clipping from the New York Times last month, the November 14 edition, and I just got around to reading it. Its the obituary of a writer and Harvard professor, Dr Richard Marius. Marius had a pretty unremarkable career: a Southern Baptist divinity school by Dr. William L. PierceWE SPOKE LAST WEEK about the hypocrisy of liberals, about the inherent hypocrisy of liberalism. Lets look at one more example of this. In March 1974 a young Black criminal, Derek Farmer, held up a jewelry store in Dayton, Ohio, with the help of another Black. Shooting broke

Fair Usage Law

December 28, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William R. King – Wikipedia

William R. King13th Vice President of the United StatesIn officeMarch 4, 1853[1] April 18, 1853PresidentFranklin PiercePreceded byMillard FillmoreSucceeded byJohn C. BreckinridgeUnited States Senatorfrom AlabamaIn officeJuly 1, 1848 December 20, 1852Preceded byArthur P. BagbySucceeded byBenjamin FitzpatrickIn officeDecember 14, 1819 April 15, 1844Preceded byNone (Statehood)Succeeded byDixon Hall LewisPresident pro tempore of the United States SenateIn officeMay 6, 1850 December 20, 1852Preceded byDavid Rice AtchisonSucceeded byDavid Rice AtchisonIn officeJuly 1, 1836 March 4, 1841Preceded byJohn TylerSucceeded bySamuel L. SouthardUnited States Minister to FranceIn officeApril 9, 1844 September 15, 1846Preceded byLewis CassSucceeded byRichard RushMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom North Carolina’s 5th districtIn officeMarch 4, 1811 November 4, 1816Preceded byThomas KenanSucceeded byCharles HooksMember of the North Carolina House of CommonsIn office18071809Personal detailsBornWilliam Rufus DeVane King(1786-04-07)April 7, 1786Sampson County, North Carolina, U.S.DiedApril 18, 1853(1853-04-18) (aged67)Selma, Alabama, U.S.Political partyDemocraticOther politicalaffiliationsDemocratic-Republican (Before 1828)Alma materUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillSignature William Rufus DeVane King (April 7, 1786 April 18, 1853) was an American politician and diplomat. He was the 13th Vice President of the United States for six weeks in 1853 before his death. Earlier he had been elected as a U.S. Representative from North Carolina and a Senator from Alabama. He also served as Minister to France during the reign of King Louis Philippe I. A Democrat, he was a Unionist and his contemporaries considered him to be a moderate on the issues of sectionalism, slavery and westward expansion, which contributed to the American Civil War. He helped draft the Compromise of 1850.[2] He is the only United States executive official to take the oath of office on foreign soil; he was inaugurated in Havana, Cuba due to poor health. King died of tuberculosis after 45 days in office. With the exceptions of John Tyler and Andrew Johnsonboth of whom succeeded to the Presidencyhe is the shortest-serving Vice President. King was the only Vice President from the State of Alabama and held the highest political office of any Alabaman in American history. He was the third Vice President to die in office. King was born in Sampson County, North Carolina, to William King and Margaret deVane. His family was large, wealthy and well-connected. He graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1803, where he was also a member of the Philanthropic Society. Admitted to the bar in 1806 after reading the law with Judge William Duffy of Fayetteville, North Carolina, he began practice in Clinton. King was an ardent Freemason, and was a member of Fayetteville’s Phoenix Lodge No. 8. King entered politics and was elected as a member of the North Carolina House of Commons, where he served from 1807 to 1809, and he became city solicitor of Wilmington, North Carolina in 1810. He was elected to the Twelfth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Congresses, serving from March 4, 1811 until November 4, 1816, when he resigned to become Secretary of the Legation for William Pinkney during Pinkney’s appointment as Minister to Russia and special diplomatic mission in Naples. When he returned to the United States in 1818, King joined the westward migration of the cotton culture to the Deep South, purchasing property at what would later be known as “King’s Bend” between present-day Selma and Cahaba on the Alabama River in Dallas County of the new Alabama Territory, which had been recently separated from Mississippi. He developed a large cotton plantation based on slave labor, calling the property “Chestnut Hill”. King and his relatives formed one of the largest slaveholding families in the state, collectively owning as many as 500. William Rufus King was a delegate to the convention which organized the Alabama state government. Upon the admission of Alabama as the twenty-second State in 1819 he was elected by the State Legislature as a Democratic-Republican to the United States Senate. King was a follower of Andrew Jackson reelected as a Jacksonian in 1822, 1828, 1834, and 1841, serving from December 14, 1819, until April 15, 1844, when he resigned. During this time, in MarchApril 1824, William R. King was honored with a single vote at the Democratic-Republican Party Caucus to be the party’s candidate for the Office of U.S. Vice President for the upcoming 1824 Presidential election. Later he served as President pro tempore of the United States Senate during the 24th through 27th Congresses. King was Chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Public Lands and the Committee on Commerce. He was appointed as Minister to France, and served from 1844 to 1846. After his return, King resumed serving in the Senate, appointed and subsequently elected to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Arthur P. Bagby. He held his seat from July 1, 1848 until resigning because of ill health on December 20, 1852, after having been elected Vice President. During the conflicts leading up to the Compromise of 1850, King supported the Senate’s gag rule against debate on antislavery petitions and opposed proposals to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, which was administered by Congress.[3] King supported a conservative, pro-slavery position, arguing that the Constitution protected the institution of slavery in both the Southern states and the federal territories. He opposed both the abolitionists’ efforts to abolish slavery in the territories as well as the “Fire-Eaters” calls for Southern secession.[3] On July 11, 1850, two days after the death of President Zachary Taylor, King was appointed Senate President pro tempore. Because Millard Fillmore ascended to the presidency, the vice presidency was vacant, making King first in the line of succession under the law then in effect. He also served as Chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Pensions. While King may have been asexual or heterosexual (but celibate), there are many indicators that suggest he was homosexual. The argument has been put forward by biographer Jean Baker,[4] supported by Shelley Ross, James W. Loewen and Robert P. Watson. The source of this interest has been King’s close and intimate relationship with President James Buchanan. The two men lived together for 13 years from 1840 until King’s death in 1853. Buchanan referred to the relationship as a “communion”,[5] and the two attended all parties together. Contemporaries also noted the closeness. Andrew Jackson called them “Miss Nancy” and “Aunt Fancy” (the former being a 19th-century euphemism for an effeminate man[6]), while Aaron V. Brown referred to King as Buchanan’s “better half”.[7] James Loewen has described Buchanan and King as “siamese twins”. Buchanan adopted King’s mannerisms and romanticised view of southern culture. Both had strong political ambitions and in 1844 they planned to run as president and vice president. Both men were soft, effeminate and eccentric.[5] They spent some time apart while King was on overseas missions in France, and their letters remain cryptic, avoiding revealing any personal feelings at all. In May 1844, Buchanan wrote to Cornelia Roosevelt, “I am now ‘solitary and alone,’ having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone, and [I] should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.”[5] After King died in 1853 Buchanan described him as “among the best, the purest and most consistent public men I have known.”[5] While some of their correspondence were destroyed by family members, the length and intimacy of surviving letters illustrate “the affection of a special friendship”.[8] The 1852 Democratic National Convention was held at the 1851 Maryland Institute for the Promotion of the Mechanic Arts Hall in Baltimore. Franklin Pierce was nominated for President, and King was nominated for Vice President. Pierce and King defeated the Whig candidates, Winfield Scott and William Alexander Graham. (While attending college, King and Graham had been members of rival campus organizations in Chapel Hill; King belonging to the Philanthropic Society and Graham to the Dialectic Society.) Because King was ill with tuberculosis and had traveled to Cuba in an effort to regain his health, he was not able to be in Washington to take his oath of office on March 4, 1853. By a Special Act of Congress, he was allowed to take the oath outside the United States, and was sworn in on March 24, 1853 near Matanzas, Cuba.[3][9][10] Shortly afterward, King returned to Chestnut Hill, where he died within two days. He was interred in a vault on the plantation and later reburied in Selma’s Old Live Oak Cemetery.[11] King never carried out any duties of the office.[12] The U.S. Senate displays a bust of King in its collection, even though he never presided over a legislative session as Vice President.[13] Following King’s death, the office of Vice President was vacant until John C. Breckinridge was inaugurated with President James Buchanan in March 1857. Engraving of Chestnut Hill, published following King’s death in the Illustrated News, New York, April 30, 1853. The house burned during the 1920s. Crypt of William R. King in Live Oak Cemetery, Selma, Alabama.

Fair Usage Law

December 21, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

All Pierce North Pedigrees

The information below was provided by the participant or his representative and may contain errors. Presentations vary depending on the information provided. It is recommended that you use the site’s search function to speed up locating the family of interest. Searches may include dates, a wife’s name, or places. First and last names can be searched together with quotation marks. This page has been optimized for IE, Chrome and Safari web browsers. Firefox browser users should used another browser. ID N59154 (Group A)1. William Pearce was born in 1878 in Bristol, England 2. Alfred Pearce was born in 1905 in Vermont, USA. He married Helen M. Rodgers (born 1907 in Vermont and died in 1973 in Vermont). He died in 1970 in Barre, Vermont. ID N10900 (Group B)Oldest known ancestor Charles D. Pierce, born 1889 or1890 in New York, New York ID 37767 (Group C)1. John Pierce b between 1707-1723 d. 1808 NY (This has not been totally proven, however looks possible) 2. Eliakim Pierce b ca 1770 MA d 4 Nov 1830 m. Mariam (UMN) b ca 1770 prob. MA, d 23 Feb 1822 NY 3. Daniel Addison Pierce b Sep 1789 MA d 19 Aug 1869 NY m. ca 1813 to Nancy (UMN) b 1788 CT d. 2 Feb 1865 NY 4. Abram Briggs Pierce b 16 Dec 1814 NY, m. before 1833 NY to Alice Ann McBurney b 1818 NY d 22 Jun 1866 5. Washington Irving Pierce b 17 Sep 1851 NY d 23 Nov 1930 MI m. 18 Mar 1873 NY to Lenora Almena Fairbanks b 17 Feb 1851 NY, d. 31 Jan 1927 MI 6. Wellington Irving Pierce b. 12 Nov 1880 Calhoun Co., MI d. 15 Feb 1965 Calhoun Co., MI, m. 4 Jul 1901 to Mary Pauline Miller b. 16 Jan 1886 Saginaw, MI, d. 5 Sep 1924 Jackson, Jackson, MI 7. Martin Irving Pierce b. 15 Dec 1912 Calhoun Co., MI, d. 11 Sep 1982 Kalamazoo, MI, m. 25 Jan 1933 Jackson, MI to Lois Julia Bordewick b 1 Jul 1915 Chicago, IL, d. 16 Jul 2001 Kalamazoo, MI ID Sorenson 1 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce b. abt. 1615 in Hingham, Kent, England m. Persis Eames. d.March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI, fell in the Rehoboth battle 2. Benjamin Pierce b. 1646 and d. 1730, Scituate, Plymouth, MA. He m. (1) Martha Adams Feb. 05, 1677/78. She was d. James Adams. He m. (2) Elizabeth (Adams) Perry July 21, 1718 res. Scituate, Plymouth, MA 3. Thomas Pierce b. Nov. 14, 1692 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA and d. 1775 He m. Mary Booth Jan. 29, 1716/17 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA 4. Ezekial Pierce b. 1718 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA, bp. Dec. 4, 1720. He m. UNKNOWN 5. Ezekial Pierce b. abt. 1739 in Scituate, Plymouth, MA and d. in Scituate, Plymouth, MA He m. Martha Merritt May 01, 1755in Scituate, Plymouth, MA 6. Augustus Pierce bp. May 29, 1757, Scituate, Plymouth, served in Rev. War and last res. Conhocton, NY 7. Gardner Pierce b. Aug. 1799 Vermont 8. Harrison Gardner Pierce b. Mar. 1839 Loon Lake, New York 9. Harrison Gordon Pierce b. April 13, 1868 in New York ID N29808 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce 2. Ephraim Pierce, Sr. 3. Ephraim Pierce, Jr. 4. Mial Pierce 5. Joshua Pierce 6. Shubel Pearce b. abt 1758 Rehoboth, Bristol Co., MA d. Jun 9, 1833, Hampton, Washington Co, NY m. Nov 5, 1778 MA to Abigail Mason b. abt 1760 Swansea, Bristol Co., MA d. Dec 17, 1842, Washington Co., NY 7. Jesse J. (Joshua?) Pearce b. abt 1898 Westfield, Washington Co, NY d. Feb 12, 1830, Washington Co, NY m. Unknown 8. Theodore S. (Shubel?) Pierce b. April 3, 1828 Hampton, Washington Co., NY d. abt 1893, Jefferson County, NE m. abt 1849 NY to Carolyn L. Potter b. Jun 11, 1832 NY or VT, d. Dec 25, 1891, NE 9. Theodore Seymore “Ted” Pierce b. Nov 10, 1854 d. Aug 26, 1924 in Moline, IL m. Jul 7, 1878 IL to Agatha Ann Harrison b. May 29, 1862 IL, d. Dec 1, 1939, IL 10. Homer Lawrence Pierce b. Mar 9, 1902 Jubilee Township, IL d. June 14, 1972 in Peoria, Peoria Co., IL m. Oct 4, 1930 to Mabel Maria Kent b. Jan 31, 1900 IL, d. Dec 18, 1990 IL ID 75407 (Group C)1. Thomas Pierce b. about 1583 England. 1633-34 settled in Charlestown, Mass. m. Elizabeth ?? d. Oct 7, 1666. 2. Samuel Pierce b. about 1617 in England. m. Mary ??? d. Sept 1678 in Malden, Mass. 3. Jonathan Pierce b. 1661. m. Mary Lobdell Dec 4, 1683. d. July 4, 1722 Charlestown, Mass. 4. Stephen Pierce b. Jan 24 1705/06 Charlestown, Mass. m. Elizabeth Rand May 20, 1728 Charlestown, Mass. d. Sept 23, 1785. 5. Stephen Pierce b. April 5, 1729 Charlestown, Mass. m. Hannah Gullison Jan 3 1753 Charlestown, Mass. d. abt. Sept 1,1783 Stratford, Conn. 6. Samuel Pierce b. July 8, 1767 Middletown, Conn. m. Anne Joyce Sept 26, 1790 Middletown, Conn. d. Mar 25 1840 Greenfield, Mass. 7. George Pierce b. Sept 13, 1804 Greenfield, Mass. m. Olive Draper Wilson Dec 28, 1825 Greenfield, Mass. d. July 30, 1878 Deerfield, Mass. 8. George Pierce b. Mar 2, 1830 Northhampton, Mass. m. Catherine Lucy Scott Jan 13, 1851 Greenfield, Mass. d. Dec 14, 1915 Greenfield, Mass. 9. Doras Manton Pierce b. Dec 21, 1867 Greenfield, Mass. m. Lena Ladelle Wilde Jun 10 1890 Ashfield, Mass. d. Jun 28 1937 Winthrop, Mass. 10. Lewis Benjamin Pierce b. Sept. 20, 1896 Somerville, Mass. m. Ilene Chase Peaslee Dec 17, 1895 Wiscasset, Maine. d. Nov. 26, 1975 Boston, Mass. ID 78848 (Group C)1. Thomas Pierce 1583/84 England. m. Elizabeth Carew 1606 Woburn, Mass. d. Oct 7, 1666 Woburn or Charlestown, Mass. 2. Thomas Pierce b. 1617/1620 Norwick, Northfolk, England. m. Elizabeth Cole May 6, 1635 Boston, Mass. d. Nov. 6, 1683 Woburn, Mass. 3. Thomas Pierce b. Jun 21 1645 Charlestown, Mass. m. Eliza d. Dec 8 1717 Woburn, Mass. 4. Thomas Pierce b. Feb 12 1670 Woburn, Mass. m. Mary Wyman Feb 27 1692 d. Jun 14 1705 Plainfield, Conn. 5. Thomas Pierce b. Oct 10 1696 Woburn, Mass. d. June 15, 1762 Plainfield, Conn. 6. John Pierce b. Feb 10 1724. m. Zerviah Spaulding Dec 24 1750 d. Sept 24 1780 Plainfield, Conn. 7. Spalding Pierce b. Feb 29 1768 Plainfield, Conn. m. Abigail Bacon April 18 1799 Paris, New York. d. Feb 14 1827 Rodman, New York. 8. Sylvester Phineas Pierce b. Sept 19, 1814 Sauquoit, New York. m. Cornelia Maria Marsh Nov 18 1841. d. Nov 5, 1893 Syracuse, New York. 9. Marsh Curtis Pierce b. Feb 19, 1847 Syracuse, New York. m. Jennie M. Cook Nov 7 1872. d. July 3 1902 10. Harry Cook Pierce b. Oct 8 1873 Syracuse, New York. m. Harriet Bennett Spencer Jan 1 1903. d. April 5 1924 Syracuse, New York. ID 85006 (Group C)1. Ephraim Percy born 1751 died 1822 Chateaugay, Franklin County, New York. Will probated 22 April 1822, Wife Sarah born 1755.Eleven children:#1 Ephraim dob 1774 married Patty dod 1834 Chateaugay, Franklin County, NY buried Brayton Hollow Cemetery, Chateaugay, NY#2 John dob 1776 married Hannah Arnold#3 Samuel dob 1779 married ??? remarried to Hannah Arnold Percy dod 27Sept 1856 Chaeteaugay, Franklin County, NY Brayton Hollow Cemetery, Cheateaugay, NY remarried Laura#4 Rebecca dob 1781 spouse Cashey#5 Elizabeth dob 1782 spouse Eliot#6 Robert dob 1783 married Jane Gray dod 7 june 1841 remarried Elizabeth#7 Abraham dob 1785#8 Jemima dob 1787 married Hodges#9 David Simeon dob 1791 married Julianna Derby#10 Garrett dob 4 oct 1795 Florida, Montgomery county, NY married 21 Jan1827 Chateaugay, NY spouse Eunice McDonald dod 4 Feb 1866 Chateaugay, NYBrayton Hollow Cemetary, Chateaugay#11 James dob 1797 dod 20 April 1861 married Sarah A. Bush 2. John Percy and wife Hannah Arnold 3. Charles Percy and wife Sarah 4. Hiram Percy and wife Clarissa 5. Lewis Addison Percy and wife Ethel Hinks ID 87049 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Peirse b. abt 1615 England d. in King Philips War on 26 Mar 1676 Rehoboth, MA at Pawtucket-Attleboro Gore. m. 1st abt 1644 Scituate, Plymouth, MA Persis Eames bp 28 Oct 1621, Fordington, St. George, Dorsetshire, England, dau. of Anthony Eames and Margery surname unknown. 13 children; 3 boys, 10 girls. m. 2nd about 1663, Anna surname unknown b. 1605 Kent, England, widow of John Allen. No children. 2. John Peirce b. 1659 Scituate, Plymouth, MA. d. 8 Sep 1750 Swansea, Bristol Co., MA. m. on 12 Dec 1683 Scituate, Patience Dodson, dau. of Anthony Dodson and Mary Williams of Scituate, MA. Both buried at Swansea in Pierce family cemetery, ages 91 and 74 respectively. 9 children; 6 boys, 3 girls. 3. John Peirce b. 12 Apr 1686 Scituate, Plymouth, MA, d. bet 1765/1766. m. on 26 Dec 1712 Scituate Abigail Vinton, dau. of Blaise Vinton and Lydia Hayden of Lynne and Scituate, MA. 9 children; 3 boys, 4 girls, 1 unknown died young. 4. Elisha Peirce b. abt 1715 Scituate, Plymouth, MA. d. aft 1765 Taunton, Bristol Co., MA. m. 5 July 1744 Dighton, Bristol Co., Ma, Sibel Perry b 1729 Dighton, dau. of William and Mary Perry. Total number of children unknown. 5. Elisha Peirce b. 1746 Taunton, Bristol Co., MA d. 7 Jul 1839 Taunton. m. 1785/6 Elizabeth Keene. Both buried Taunton, Bristol Co., MA ages 93 and 92 respectively. 12 children; 4 boys, 8 girls. 6. Eliphalet Pierce b. 3 Jun 1782 Dighton, Bristol Co., MA. d. 1840/50 Athens, Menard Co., IL m. 3 Apr 1804 Annis McMichel, b. 12 July 1785, dau. of Robert McMichel and Sarah Comins of Palmer, Hampden Co., MA. 4 children; 2 boys, 2 girls. 7. Hollom Pierce b. 26 Sep 1805 New York. d. 2 Nov 1859 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL. m. abt 1834 New York Lucena Winters, dau. of Nathan Winters and Grace Kelsey of New York and Vermont. 11 children; 5 boys, 4 girls, twins died young. 8. Sherman Nathan Pierce b. 29 Aug 1836 Tuna, Cattaraugus Co., NY. d. 24 Aug 1925 Marion, Marion Co., KS. m. on 1 Jan 1860 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL Sarah Ann Boughan dau. of Berryman Boughan and Bathsheba Hedrick of Logan Co., IL. 12 children; 4 boys and 7 girls. 1 boy, 1 girl, 1 infant died young. 9. Charles Edwin Pierce b. 14 Jan 1863 Lincoln, Logan Co., IL. d. 21 Mar 1947 Marion, Marion Co., KS. m. 10 Dec 1888 at Marion Co., KS Christiane Marie Lisette Baker dau. of George Christoph Gottfried Baker and Christiane Marie Awick of Waverly, Pike Co., OH. 8 children; 5 boys and 3 girls. 10. Elmer Edwin Pierce b. 24 Jun 1904 Marion, Marion Co., KS. d. 28 Sep 1937 Topeka, Shawnee Co., KS. m. on 2 May 1930 Wichita, Sedgwick Co., KS Maxine Louise Bailey, dau. of Henry E. Bailey and Maude M. Sadil. Children: 2 boys. ID N50840 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce, b. abt. 1615, m. ?. m. 2nd, Annah James. Res.Hingham and Scituate, Mass. He was killed by Indians Sunday, Mar. 26, 1676. 2. Ephraim Pierce m. Hannah Holbrook. He moved to Warwick R.I., from Weymoth, Mass. where his first child was born. Will dated July 18, 1718 and was proved in Warwick, Sept. 23, 1719. He d. Sept. 14, 1719. 3. Azrikim Pierce b. Jan. 4, 1671, m. Dec. 31, 1696 Sarah Heywood or Howard. m. 2nd, May 6, 1713, Elizabeth Esten. Res. Warwick R.I. and moved to Rehoboth, Mass. before 1721. 4. Joseph Pierce b. April 7, 1714. m. Oct. 3, 1734, Mary Martin. He died May 5, 1787. His will was proved Jan. 5, 1787. Res. Rehoboth, Mass. 5. Nathaniel Pierce b. July 9, 1735. m. June 24, 1756, Sarah Pierce. m. 2nd, ?. He died Feb. 26, 1821. Res. Rehoboth, Mass. 6. Aaron Pierce b. Sept. 20, 1765. m. Nov. 14, 1793, Elipha Bliss. m. 2nd, Jan. 23, 1800, Nancy Rounds. He died in 1831. Res. Rehoboth, Mass. 7. Barnard W. Pierce b. Sept. 11, 1810. m. Oct. 29, 1835, Martha H. Smith. m. 2nd, Oct. 1855, Esther Arnold. Res. Westerly, R.I. 8. Edgar B. Pierce b. Oct. 10, 1842. m. Nov. 1865, Eliza R. Smith. m. 2nd, June 23, 1873, Gertrude M. Smith. Res. New London, Conn. 9. Courtland B. Pierce b. March 4, 1885. ID 88434 (Group C) – This pedigree from Pierce Genealogy by Frederick Clifton Pierce1. Ephraim Percy, Sr. b. 1743 in Mohawktown, NY d bef Apr 22, 1822 when his will was probated at Chateaugay, NY. He was married bef 1782 to Sarah, surname unknown. 2. Robert Percy, b. Oct 7, 1782 Florida Township, Franklin, NY d. Jun 7, 1841 at Cape Vincent, NY. He m. Elizabeth Vaughn after the death of his first wife. Elizabeth died Dec 12, 1859 at Cape Vincent, NY. Robert and Elizabeth Vaughn had five children including David Frederick. 3. David Frederick Percy b Apr 17, 1819 Wolfe Island, Ontario, Canada. d. Feb 13 1865 at Cape Vincent, NY. m. Abigail Woodman Mar 3, 1841 at Pamelia, NY. Abigail died Jul 19, 1864 on Wolfe Island. 4. Benson Alexander Percy b. Jan 1, 1861, Cape Vincent, NY d. Feb 23, 1931 Sterlingville, NY After the death of his first wife he m. (2nd) Cecilia Mary Gegoux Dec 28, 1890 Clayton County, NY. Cecilia d May 7, 1933 in Watertown, NY. 5. Ray Sidney Percy, b. Jan 3, 1893 in Clayton, NY d. May 8, 1933 Sterlingville, NY. m. Jun 4, 1918 in Aldrige Settlement, NY to Lucy May O’Connell. Lucy d. Feb 26, 1981 in Cicero, NY. ID 118177 (Group C)1. Captain Michael Pierce was born 1615 in England. He married Persis Eames in 1645 in Hingham, MA. He died March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI. 2. Eprhaim Pierce, Sr. was born in 1647 in Scituate, MA. He married Hannah Holbrook in 1670 in MA. He died April 29, 1719 in Warwick, RI. 3. Ephraim Pierce, Jr. was born in 1674 in Warwick RI. He married Mary Low about 1693 in Swansea, MA. He died in Rehoboth, MA. 4. Dea. Mial Pierce was born April 24, 1692 or 3 in Swansea or Rehoboth, MA. He married Judith Rounds Ellis about 1717. He died Oct. 18, 1786 in Rehoboth, MA. 5. Lt. Job Pierce Sr. was born April 25, 1723 in Rehoboth MA. He married in the 1750s Abigail Pratt. He died Oct 4 or 6, 1791 in Rehoboth, MA. 6. Job Pierce Jr. was born Aug. 7, 1753 in Rehoboth, MA. He married Hannah Bullock Dec. 29, 1776. He died Aug. 30, 1818 in Rehoboth, MA. 7. Benoni Pierce was born Oct. 21, 1781 in Rehoboth, MA. He married Elizabeth Davis Jan 1, 1805 in NY or MA. He died June 26, 1855 in Blenheim Hill, NY. 8. Lemuel Davis Pierce was born April 9, 1810 in Gilboa, NY. He married Lydia Ruliffson April 28, 1836 in New York. He died Dec. 19, 1898 in Balaton, MN. 9. Charles William Pierce was born March 25, 1842 in N. Blenheim NY. He married Zoa Catherine van Deusen Feb. 29, 1868 in Green Lake Co., WI. He died Feb. 18, 1914 in Minneapolis, MN. 10. Frank Joseph Pierce was born June 21, 1875 in Guttenberg, IA. He married Eloda J. Sigurdson May 17, 1897 in Marshall, MN. He died Nov. 17, 1953 in Minneapolis, MN. She died July 27, 1904 and their children were orphaned. 11. Wesley Eugene Foster was born April 30, 1901 in Marshall, MN to Frank Pierce. He was adopted by J.J. Foster in MN as a young child. Wesley married Lenora Ruth Walter in 1938 or 1939, likely in Souix Falls, SD. He died January 22, 1974 in Pontiac, MI. ID 140847 (Group C)1. CAPTAIN MICHAEL PIERCE was born 1615 in England. He married PERSIS EAMES in 1645 in Hingham, MA. He died March 26, 1676 in Pawtucket, RI. 2. EPHRAIM PIERCE SR. was born 1646 in Hingham, Massachusetts, and died September 1719 in Warwick, Rhode Island. He married HANNAH HOLBROOK. She was born 1648 in Weymouth, Massachusetts, and died 1719 in Warwick, Massachusetts. 3. EPHRAIM PIERCE JR. was born 1674 in Higham, Massachusetts, and died 1772 in Glouster, Rhode Island. He married MARY LOW. She was born 1677 in Swansea, Bristol MAssachusetts, and died Bef. 1772 in Glouster, Rhode Island. 4. MIAL PIERCE was born April 25, 1693 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died October 18, 1786 in Rehoboth, Bristol, MAssachusetts. He married JUDITH ROUND. She was born 1687 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died October 06, 1744 in Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts. 5. JOSHUA PIERCE was born 1728 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died 1785 in Rehoboth, Bristol, Massachusetts. He married MARY NORTON. She was born 1727 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts, and died 1791 in Swansea, Bristol, Massachusetts.

Fair Usage Law

December 12, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

Thoughts On The Holocaust by Dr. William Luther Pierce – youtube.com

WLP school for lemmings. “Cattle die, and kinsmen die, and so must one die oneself.But there is one thing I know which never dies,and that isthe fame of a dead man’s deeds.” –Old Norse Proverb https://archive.org/details/DrWilliam… The Nordic Resistance MovementSWE: https://www.nordfront.se/NOR: https://www.frihetskamp.net/FIN: http://www.patriootti.com/DEN: http://www.nordfront.dk/

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

William Luther Pierce – Internet Archive

1990s[edit] 1990[edit] We must reach out to our people. We must alert them. We must educate them. We must encourage them. We must inspire them. And here’s a beautiful, wonderful thing: when you reach out to other people to encourage them and inspire them, you yourself will be encouraged and inspired. When you find out how many other people there are who share our concerns, our feelings, our values, our sense of responsibility, you cannot help but be encouraged. Even the hatred that you encounter from some people — especially from people in the controlled media — will be encouraging. For you will understand that they would not hate us so much if they did not fear us. And the reason that they fear us is that deep inside them they know that what we say is true. So let’s get out there — all of us — and start looking for encouragement! The Big Picture, 1996[1] You who are reading this are at least partially awake. You are a cut above Joe and Jill Sixpack. So I say to you: think about what you are doing with your life. Think about the responsibility you have to your children and grandchildren and great grandchildren. Think about the responsibility you have to all of those who came before you and whose sacrifices made your life possible. And think about your responsibility to yourself, your responsibility to be the best person, the most righteous person, that you can be. Think about all of these things, and then let me hear from you. – Time To Do What’s Right, 1997[2] The people are being kept in line at the moment, because there are still lots of shiny new things for them to buy. But more and more Americans are beginning to look beyond their immediate material comfort and to worry about the long-term moral slide of their country. If the economy slips badly, there will be hell to pay. More and more people will listen to the dissidents. A big problem for the Jews is how to silence the dissidents now, how to stifle the people who are asking inconvenient questions and thinking dangerous thoughts, before these thoughts spread to other people. They’ve tried to do it with legislation, but the country isn’t yet in a mood to be told what it can think. What the Jews need is a nice, big war. Then they can crack down on the dissidents. Then they can call us “subversives.” Then they can call us “unpatriotic,” because we will be against their war… That’s why I am convinced that there will be a strong effort to involve America in another major war during the next four years. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. While the warmongers are scheming for war, they will tell us how much they want peace. They’re good at that sort of thing. They’ve had a lot of practice. But they will be scheming for war, believe me, no matter what they say. And when that war comes, remember what you have read today. Get Set for War, 1997. The New World Order schemers are absolutely determined to have their way. They have been able to go a long way toward their goal by using subterfuge and deceit. But ultimately the transformation of a world of independent nations into the global plantation they are aiming at will involve changes so profound and so traumatic that subterfuge and deceit will not be enough to keep the serfs under control. They will need raw police power, applied KGB style. They want to begin developing that power now. They’re a pretty bold and arrogant bunch of schemers, but they understand that according to the old way of looking at things — according to our way — they are traitors. They understand that if the general public ever gets a real inkling of what they are up to, if they ever lose their grip on the situation, they’ll all end up hanging from lampposts. What they are planning is so monstrous, so evil, that the thought of being brought to account for it frightens them. They want to use every means at their disposal to make sure their plan succeeds. And, my friends, we will resort to every means at our disposal to insure that their scheme does not succeed and that they do indeed end up hanging from lampposts. The New World Order, 1997. You know, the media and the politicians would have us believe that there’s something inherently immoral about terrorism. That is, they would have us believe that it’s not immoral for us to destroy a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan with cruise missiles, but it is immoral for someone like Bin Laden to blow up a government building in Washington with a truck bomb. It’s okay for us to take out an air-raid shelter full of women and children in Baghdad with a smart bomb, but it’s cowardly and immoral for an Iraqi or Iranian agent to pop a vial of sarin in a New York subway tunnel. Really, what should we expect? They don’t have aircraft carriers and cruise missiles and stealth bombers. So should we expect them to just sit there and take their punishment when we wage war on them? I think that it is the most reasonable thing in the world for them to hit back at us in the only way they can. It actually takes more courage to be a terrorist behind enemy lines than it does to push the firing button for a cruise missile a hundred miles away from your target. And yet we certainly will see Bill Clinton and every other Jew-serving politician in our government on television denouncing as a “cowardly act” the first terrorist bomb which goes off in the United States as a result of a war against Iraq. And don’t be surprised when the FBI and the CIA announce that they have studied the evidence carefully and have determined that it was Iranian terrorists who built the bomb, so that the Jews will have an excuse for expanding the war to take out Iran as well as Iraq. Why War? (November 21, 1998), American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 21, 1998 If we’re going to consider failure to comply with UN directives a good reason for wrecking a country with cruise missiles, hey, I can think of a country in the Middle East which is in violation of a lot more UN directives than Iraq is. Israel has consistently thumbed its nose at UN directives, and no one in Washington has ever told Israel, “Comply or get hit.” Let’s understand one fundamental fact. This crusade against Iraq isn’t about the United Nations or international security or stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It’s about making the Middle East safe for Israel to continue bullying its neighbors and stealing from them. Every other explanation is lies and hypocrisy. And we really can expect a bigger dose of lies and hypocrisy than usual as the warmongers work to get this war against Iraq started. The media bosses will trot more generals and politicians in front of the TV cameras and have them bluster patriotically about how we’re not going to let Saddam Hussein get away with it any longer, by god, and they’ll show groups of military personnel cheering when they’re told that they’re being shipped out to the Persian Gulf to kick Saddam Hussein’s behind and keep him from getting away with whatever it is he’s getting away with, which mainly seems to be running his country the way he wants to instead of the way the United Nations tells him. They will work overtime at convincing the couch potatoes and the mindless yahoos who like to wave flags and shout patriotic slogans that destroying Iraq really is an act of American patriotism. And as long as the number of Americans killed in a Jewish war against Iraq remains small, the flag-waving yahoos and the bought politicians ought to be able to drown out any dissent from Americans like me who believe that we don’t have any reasonable justification for waging such a war. And keeping casualties small ought to be easy, so long as it remains strictly a high-tech war, with us launching missiles against defenseless targets from many miles away. Of course, sometimes wars get out of hand, and unexpected things happen. If the Jews manage to get Iran involved in the war also — and that’s what they really want to do, what they really need to do — then I think we stand a pretty good chance of seeing some major terrorist activity in the United States. I know that if I were Osama bin Laden, I’d have been spending my time getting ready for just such a development ever since Bill Clinton blew up that pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. I’d be putting my teams into place in the United States, assembling materials, choosing targets, and waiting for the Jews to provide justification for me to begin killing Americans on a significant scale. Of course, whether Osama bin Laden is as resourceful and as capable as he’s said to be remains to be seen. Personally, I have very little faith in the ability of these flea-bitten Muslims to get things done. But we’ll see. Why War? (November 21, 1998), American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 21, 1998. Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote. Why is that? Why can’t the Indonesians have an Islamic theocracy if they want? Why can’t the Pakistanis have a military dictatorship? Why can’t the Serbs run their own country the way they prefer? What is the appeal in making sure that people whose minds have been wasted by Alzheimer’s Disease vote? Well, let’s not beat around the bush: the appeal of mass democracy lies in the fact that in essentially every country in the world today, the number of persons unable to think for themselves is substantially larger than the number able to make independent decisions. Those unable to think for themselves have their thinking done for them by the people who control the mass media. Which is to say, democracy is the preferred system because it gives the political power to those who own or control the mass media and at the same time allows them to remain behind the scenes and evade responsibility for the way in which they use that power. And the more inclusive the democracy is — that is, the more Alzheimer’s sufferers and Mongoloid cretinsand paranoid schizophrenics and people who live in empty packing cases in alley ways and Jamaican immigrants and football fans are able to vote — the more certain is the grip of the media masters on the political process. Those voters who buy astrology magazines at the checkout stand and spend their time watching soap operas, game shows, and Oprah absorb their general attitudes on things through the television screen. They learn which ideas are fashionable and which are not by noticing the facial expression and tone of voice of Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather when the news is announced each day. Their opinions on specific issues are formed as they view televised sidewalk surveys taken by reporters. The only uncertainty about these people is whether or not they’ll be able to pryt hemselves loose from their couches long enough to vote for the designated candidates. That’s why it’s important to have lots of them. And wherever there are lots of them, the men who control the mass media also will control the outcome of elections. It’s a much surer way of controlling governments than bribing corrupt dictators or slipping seductive whores into the king’s bedroom a la Esther and Ahasuerus — or Monica and Bill. Believe me, one day soon the Jews on both sides of the great water will institute a web-TV voting system that allows the couch potatoes and the ball game fans to vote without having to getup from their couches, just by clicking their remote controls at their TV screens to select the next President or prime minister. That will be real democracy. The New Protocols, 1999. This trendy, new crowd, which likes to do everything with committees, really believes that all it takes to make anything legal and OK is a majority. I guess they call that democracy. When the majority is what it has become in the United States today, a better name is mobocracy. But really, it’s much worse than mob rule. It is rule by a self-appointed elite of utterly evil and destructive people who have in their hands the tools for controlling and guiding the mob. They’re pretty cocky now — so cocky, in fact, that they’re making statements of the sort I’ve quoted today. They’re cocky because they believe that no one can take away from them their tools for controlling the mob, and that as time passes and America becomes darker and more degenerate, their grip on the mob will only become firmer. Our job is to prove them wrong. It’s a big job, and we’d better get started. The New World Order, 1999. Other people tell me that whatever solution we seek to the problems our people are facing today must be a solution without violence. And my response to that is that I am a peaceful man. All my adult life I have been a scholar and a teacher, never a man of violence. But look at the behavior of our opponents! All they know is violence and coercion and murder. I do not want violence, and I am determined to avoid it as long as I can. Our Revolutionary Right, 1999. People tell me, “Oh, you must not advocate doing anything illegal.” My answer to them is that I have been a law-abiding man all my life. I believe in law and order. I believe that we must have a society governed strictly by laws, not by mobs or by any tyrant’s whims of the moment — or by any clever tribe of alien manipulators who have gained control of our mass media. But does anyone really believe that we have a society governed by laws today? Let us remember that we are living now in the era of O.J. Simpson and Bill Clinton. We have laws on the books, and we have police and courts which have the theoretical responsibility for enforcing those laws. And when it is Politically Correct to do so, they will. Our Revolutionary Right, 1999. From my viewpoint it’s the Clinton gang who are the outlaws, the violators of our Constitution and of all of our old-fashioned legal and moral principles, and anything that we do to oppose them is legal and is morally justified. Anyone who goes along with them is a traitor, in the strict, old-fashioned sense of the word, and anyone who sits on his hands now and refuses to oppose the Clinton gang is not much better. The New World Order, 1999. The only reason that a rabble of feminists and queers and Jews and Blacks and mestizos and liberals and Clinton supporters are running America into the ground today is that decent people are sitting on their hands. If the decent people in America would get off their hands and accept personal responsibility for what is being done to their world, and if they would make a commitment and begin working together, we could sweep the whole Clinton coalition into the dustbin of history. It doesn’t matter that the Clinton rabble outnumber us. We will whip them in a minute. We will have the media bosses jumping into the ocean all along the East Coast and swimming toward Israel as fast as they can go. But first we must be willing to accept personal responsibility. And so my message today to every decent person who is listening is this: Don’t be a shirker. Don’t try to be a smart guy by continuing to cheer from the sidelines but refusing to join the team and get out on the field. Stand up and become a participant in life. Make of your life a model that people will remember and talk about long after you’re gone. – Thoughts on Accepting Responsibility, 1999[3] Bill Clinton said in his Portland State University speech that anyone who doesn’t want America to become darker is “un-American.” Isn’t that something? This jerk who used to organize anti-American demonstrations during the Vietnam war and chant, “Ho, Ho, Ho Chih Minh, the Viet Cong’s gonna win,” is now telling us that we’re “un-American”! Thinking About a White Future, 1998[4] 2000s[edit] 2001[edit] In 1918 Hitler was in a military hospital blinded from a British poison gas attack. He was just a corporal, he had no family, a limited education, no friends, no connections, no political status, nothing. He decides that he will lead Germany in redressing the grievous wrongs that had been done to it after the First World War and straightening out some of the mistakes that were being made in German society. And fifteen years later he is Chancellor of Germany and he did what he said he was going to do. A wounded war veteran with nobody to help him, and he pulled it up just through his own willpower. That is an amazing story. – The Fame of a Dead Man’s deeds, 2001[5] 2002[edit] These days, to be “patriotic” means to wave the flag and shout slogans whenever the mass media deem it appropriate. It means to cheer the government whenever the government decides to use its cruise missiles or its smart bombs to kill a bunch of people in some other country, regardless of the reason. Instead of blood-based patriotism, today we have government-based patriotism. If you wave the flag and support the government, you’re a patriot. If you don’t like what the government is doing and you say so, then all of the flag-waving, slogan-shouting yahoos look at you as if you were the enemy. The New Patriotism, 2002 Cattle die,kinsmen dieyou yourself die;I know one thingwhich never dies:the judgment of a dead man’s life.

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed

The Best of Dr. William Pierce – Renegade Tribune

Shame that we still have these same self-hating delusional whites even years later with all the obvious signs that we are being genocided. A great deal of whites, especially in America and Western Europe, are lead by their feelings and blinded by Jewish Marxist propaganda. While there are a number of whites who are waking up and fighting out genocide, I am still shocked at the SJW and nonsense about were all the same or Theyre trying to conquer and divide humanity If I give whites the facts and information, its up to them to come toRead more Vote Up1Vote Down Reply

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2017   Posted in: William Luther Pierce  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."