Charlie Hebdo: ‘They wanted us to be angels. We are not …

It is three years since terrorists murdered the staff of France’s satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo.

Government ministers are due to attend a memorial ceremony on Sunday for the journalists who were killed.

The magazine says it is struggling with an annual security bill of 1.5 million.

Brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi burst in on an editorial meeting at the magazine’s headquarters in Paris.

Twelve people died in the shooting, including five senior journalists and cartoonists.

Days later, two million people marched through Paris in an outpouring of national solidarity embodied worldwide in the motto “Je suis Charlie.”

Four Jewish people and a female police officer were also killed that week in terrorist attacks by Amedy Coulibaly.

All three gunmen were killed in shootouts with police.

Since then, 241 people have been murdered in France in a wave of attacks that started in November 2015 with the massacres in Paris that took 130 lives.

The satirical weekly has published an edition bearing the headline “Three years in a jam-jar”. It says sales have fallen away, death threats from Islamist sympathisers have flooded in on social media and it has been left to fend for itself.

Charlie’s sales surged to more than seven million copies of the first edition after the massacre but have now fallen off.

They topped 60 million in 2015 but fell back to 19 million in 2016.

Death threats are continuing to come in on social media, Charlie says, forcing it to seek protection.

“Is it normal for a newspaper in a democratic country that one out of every two copies sold in the newsagent’s has to finance the security of its offices?” – Charlie Hebdo editor Laurent Sourisseau.

Charlie journalist Fabrice Nicolino says staff are “in mourning that will never end”, living and working in conditions “that do not bring honour to France.”

Charlie journalist Guillaume Emer says France has turned away from Charlie after turning it into a symbol. “Amazingly, we are not very much supported by the country. The country wanted us to be angels. We are not angels at all.”

Read the original:

Charlie Hebdo: ‘They wanted us to be angels. We are not …

Related Post

January 11, 2018   Posted in: Charlie Hebdo |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."