$3M lawsuit filed against white nationalists after deadly car attack following Charlottesville rally – Fredericksburg.com

Two sisters involved in the car attack that killed Heather Heyer on Saturday filed a lawsuit Tuesday against Unite the Right organizer Jason Kessler, James Alex Fields Jr., Richard Spencer and 30 other groups and individuals.

Tadrint and Micah Washington, the plaintiffs who were in a car that was hit during the attack Saturday, are seeking $3 million in damages.

The sisterswho said they did not take part in any protesting that daywere on their way home when they found themselves being detoured down 4th Street SE. They stopped at the intersection of 4th Street SE and East Water Street to let a large group of protesters cross the street, according to the lawsuit.

Police have said they planned to keep 4th Street closed to traffic until 7 p.m., according to a traffic plan released prior to Saturdays rally. But when asked why there were three cars on the road before the attack, police said they have not completed the investigation.

At a news conference on Monday, Charlottesville Police Chief Al Thomas said he was unsure whether authorities had officially opened the crossing to traffic. He added that he was certain the action plan called for it to be closed.

About 1:42 p.m., a grey Dodge Challenger turned down 4th Street and accelerated into the group of pedestrians, killing 32-year-old Heyer and injuring 19 others. When the Challenger, allegedly driven by Fields, crashed into the sisters vehicle, the two were slammed into the dashboard and windshield, leaving them with serious injuries, the lawsuit alleged.

Shortly after the attack, Fields was arrested and charged with second degree murder, malicious wounding and failing to stop at an accident.

Along with Kessler, Fields and Spencer, the lawsuit names as defendants Mike Peinovich (who runs a right-wing podcast), Michael Hill (founder of the neo-confederate League of the South and a leader of the Nationalist Front) and Matthew Heimbach (a leader of the Traditionalist Worker Party and the Nationalist Front), the Traditionalist Worker Party, the League of the South Party, Vanguard America, the National Socialist Movement, the Nationalist Front, the National Policy Institute, and the Proud Boys.

The suit also names David Duke (former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan), the Council of Conservative Citizens, AltRight.com, Augustus Invictus (founder of the military wing of the Proud Boys), Pax Dickinson, Christopher Cantwell, Andrew Anglin (founder of the Daily Stormer), the Daily Stormer, Identity Dixie, Identity Evropa, Nathan Damigo, the Red Elephants, the American Resistance, the American Freedom Keepers and the Pennsylvania Light Foot Militia.

The suit also includes John Doe 1-1,000 and Jane Doe 1-1,000 to represent other people from the rally that have not yet been identified.

Timothy Litzenburg, of the Miller Firm, LLC in Orange, took on the case because he said the Saturdays events in Charlottesville were as frightening as 1930s Germany. Calling the car attack an act of domestic terror, he said he wanted to represent the Washington sisters who experienced the violence first hand.

Were fighting fascism, Litzenburg said.

For the John Does mentioned in the suit, Litzenburg said the firm intends to add people and organizations as they are identified in photos and videos.

It leaves us room in the lawsuit as we learn more about who was there, said Litzenburg.

Read more here:

$3M lawsuit filed against white nationalists after deadly car attack following Charlottesville rally – Fredericksburg.com

Related Post

August 16, 2017   Posted in: Council of Conservative Citizens |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."