Netanyahu kept defense minister in dark about German-Egyptian submarine deal report – The Times of Israel

Israel reportedly gave an official go-ahead to Germany to sell advanced submarines to Egypt without telling its defense minister or the president.

In May 2015, during a visit to Berlin to mark 50 years of Israeli-German diplomatic relations, President Reuven Rivlin told Chancellor Angela Merkel that he had been asked to convey concern about the German deal to sell four submarines and two anti-submarine warships to Cairo, Channel 10 investigative reporter Raviv Drucker reported Tuesday.

To the embarrassment of both, Merkel told Rivlin that Israel had already given the green light for the deal to go forward, Drucker said.

On Tuesday, it was reported that Germany had told Israel it was delaying the signing of a different deal, for Israel to purchase three new submarines, amid a rapidly expanding corruption scandal surrounding several multi-billion-dollar naval agreements between the two countries.

Germanys transaction with Egypt which involved submarines very similar in advanced technology to those that Israel has ordered was vehemently opposed by then-defense minister Moshe Yaalon and the defense establishment.

Outgoing Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon (C) arrives at a press conference at army headquarters in Tel Aviv to announce his resignation from politics, May 20, 2016. (Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied having approved the Egyptian deal when Yaalon, who found out about the transaction by chance, asked him about it, Yedioth reported.

It was only after Rivlins return from Berlin that he realized it had been approved, over the heads of the Defense Ministry.

It was the second time Germany had agreed to sell submarines to Egypt.

In 2009, Netanyahu and the defense minister at the time, Ehud Barak, gave their approval to German moves to sell less advanced submarines to then-Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak. The deal fell through after Mubarak was ousted and replaced by Mohammad Morsi in 2012 and was only renegotiated after Abdel Fattah el-Sissi came to power in 2014.

Meanwhile, Israeli police have been probing possible corruption in a series of deals that Israel signed with the German shipbuilder, ThyssenKrupp, to buy submarines and ships.

Miki Ganor, the former Israeli agent for ThyssenKrupp, is under arrest in connection with the case, along with former National Security Council deputy head Avriel Bar-Yosef. Others suspects have been released or are under house arrest.

Ganor continued Tuesday to negotiate a deal to turn states witness via his new lawyer, Eli Zohar, who was at the police fraud squads Lahav 433 headquarters in Lod during the day.

Miki Ganor, arrested in the submarine affair also known as Case 3000, is brought for a court hearing at the Magistrates Court in Rishon Lezion, July 10, 2017. (Moti Kimchi/Pool)

On Tuesday, reports emerged that a second individual was also interested in turning states witness.

Police believe Ganor holds highly sensitive information about other Israeli defense deals that could implicate additional figures in the defense establishment.

Ganors transformation to states witness could spell bad news for another suspect in the case, former commander of the Israeli Navy Maj. Gen. (res) Eliezer Marom, who has admitted agreeing to recommend Ganor to represent the German shipbuilding giant in Israel but has denied being paid to do so.

Originally posted here:
Netanyahu kept defense minister in dark about German-Egyptian submarine deal report – The Times of Israel

Related Post

July 19, 2017   Posted in: Egypt |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."