Britain’s first same-sex marriage celebrated in a Scottish church … – Deseret News

LONDON The first gay marriage in an Anglican church in Britain took place this week, a day after Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby described the continuing squabbles over same-sex marriage in the worldwide Anglican Communion as intractable.

The gay couple, known as Mark and Rick, had their order of service posted on Facebook, which told people that they were married on Tuesday (Aug. 1) at a service that included the Eucharist at St. Johns Episcopal Church in the center of Edinburgh. The Rev. Markus Dnzkofer, rector of St. Johns, a church of the Scottish Episcopal Church, which is part of the Anglican Communion, officiated.

The wedding was a small intimate occasion, said Dnzkofer. The couple, he said, were Americans with Scottish connections who had been together 24 years.

This was not some pretty, fancy occasion, he said. They wanted a religious ceremony and they wanted it to be a nuptial Mass.

In June, the Scottish Episcopal Church, which is part of the Anglican Communion, announced that it was allowing gay weddings after its synod voted to amend its canon law on marriage. The change was made when the synod agreed the law stating that marriage was between one man and one woman should be removed.

Anglican national churches in Brazil, South Africa, South India, New Zealand and Canada have taken steps toward approving and celebrating same-sex relationships amid strong resistance among other national churches within the 80 million-member global body. The Episcopal Church in the U.S. has allowed gay marriage since 2015.

The Scottish vote sparked a backlash from traditionalists in the Global Anglican Future Conference, or GAFCON. The group responded by announcing it had appointed a missionary bishop to Scotland to offer alternative leadership for traditionalist Anglicans opposed to the synods decision.

Welby, speaking to the BBC from Africa where he has been traveling, was asked if the Anglican Communions rift over homosexuality might worsen, given that the communions center of growth is on that continent, where traditional views on marriage hold sway.

The archbishop answered: Its an intractable problem. This is more complex than having a binary approach. There is not an easy fix, but the primates (of the Anglican Communion) have said that they will work together.

But the situation in Scotland will make the archbishop of Canterburys task in keeping the Anglican Communion together much more difficult.

Since the vote in June, at least nine Scottish Episcopal Church clergy have registered to officiate at same-sex weddings. The first to sign up was the Rev. Kelvin Holdsworth, the provost of St Marys Cathedral in Glasgow.

Holdsworth, a leading figure in the Changing Attitude Scotland campaign, said that people in Scotland have changed their minds on gay marriage and now support it.

The congregation has been hugely supportive. There were loud cheers in church when I announced that bookings for weddings were now open to all couples, when I received permission to do this a couple of weeks ago, Holdsworth said. Several members of the congregation were wearing badges saying, The Archbishop of Canterbury has no jurisdiction in this realm of Scotland.

St. Johns Church in Edinburgh first announced that it would offer the rite of marriage beginning in July. Dnzkofer said that there had been dialogue throughout the Scottish Episcopal Church about human sexuality and same-sex marriage.

It has been easier than in the Church of England, he said. We are a smaller church, we are not the established church and there is less of an evangelical voice. But we heard different perspectives and heard very different voices.

Dnzkofer estimated about 80 percent of his congregation approved the change in doctrine. St Johns website reflects these varying opinions, with an apology for the deep pain the church caused to LGBTQ people and their families. (W)e asked for forgiveness for our resistance to proclaiming the love of God more courageously. We have failed.

But it also says that it recognizes that the radical move by the Scottish Episcopal Church will be difficult for some people. We also have failed in loving more generously and embracing more compassionately those who disagree with recent developments in church and state. For this we are sorry, too.

The proximity of Scotland to the Church of England will make the situation particularly difficult for Welby. Although they have only an estimated 100,000 members, the impact of gay weddings in its Scottish Episcopal churches will be significant, according to Simon Sarmiento, of the website, Thinking Anglicans.

Gay Anglicans in England will be able to travel to Scotland to get married, putting more pressure on the Church of England, he said.

Within the Church of England there are deeply divergent views on gays, and at the most recent General Synod, a bishops report advocating no change in the churchs stance on the blessing of gay partnerships or the conducting of gay marriages was narrowly rejected.

Since then a Pastoral Advisory Group has been set up and chaired by Bishop of Newcastle Christine Hardman to support and advise dioceses on pastoral approaches to human sexuality.

Holdsworth said Welby is wrong to say the problem is intractable and urged him to speak to gay people who want to help come up with solutions.

If Justin Welby wants to hear from passionate Anglicans with lots of ideas about how to solve these troubles then one of the things he needs to do is to speak to the people concerned. LGBT people from around the communion would be willing to meet him to help find solutions, Holdsworth said. The last time an international meeting of LGBT activists was invited to meet with a senior leader from the Anglican Communion was in 2005.

(Catherine Pepinster is a London-based correspondent)

View original post here:

Britain’s first same-sex marriage celebrated in a Scottish church … – Deseret News

Related Post

August 7, 2017   Posted in: Gay Marriage |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."