Trump nominee: Same-sex marriage could lead to legalizing pedophilia – The Hill

President Trump’s nominee for the top science position at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has argued that the legalization of same-sex marriage could lead to legalized pedophilia, CNN’s KFile reported on Monday.

Sam Clovis made the comments on his conservative radio show and in an op-ed in a conservative blog in separate incidents ranging from 2011 to 2015, according to the news network’s investigative unit.

If we protect LGBT behavior, what other behaviors are we going to protect? Are we going to protect pedophilia? he asked in avideouncovered by the CNN team. We’re not thinking the consequences of these decisions through.”

“I think it’s a logical extension of thought. And if you cannot follow the logic, then you’re denying youre in denial.”

Questioned by CNN about Clovis’s comments, aUSDA spokeswoman referred to the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage in all 50 states.

“The Supreme Court settled the issue in 2015, the spokeswoman said.

CNN also found that Clovis repeatedly argued that being a member of the LGBT population is a “choice.”

The science on this issue seems to be uncertain, and if one followed the arguments from plaintiffs, the issue argued was that these individuals, because of ‘love,’ should be allowed to marry just like opposite-sex couples, he said in 2011, for example.

Clovis has made a number of controversial statements in the past, including hissuggestion that former President Obama wanted to enslave his opponents and that Obamawas happy after the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

Reportssurfacedafter Clovis’s nomination that he was a climate change denier who holds no science degree.

Read more from the original source:

Trump nominee: Same-sex marriage could lead to legalizing pedophilia – The Hill

Related Post

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Gay Marriage |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."