Blast Hits Palestinian Prime Ministers Convoy in Gaza …

Mr. Hamdallah continued on to a scheduled appearance in Beit Lahia, at the opening of a long-awaited water-treatment project. They blew up three cars in my convoy near Beit Hanoun, he told reporters at the event.

Fatah officials immediately pointed fingers at Hamas. The office of Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authoritys president and the leader of Fatah, said it holds Hamas responsible for the cowardly attack, and Hussein al-Sheikh, a member of Fatahs Central Committee who is the authoritys minister of civil affairs, called Hamas fully responsible.

Majid Faraj, the Palestinian Authoritys intelligence chief, who was with Mr. Hamdallah, stopped short of blaming Hamas but noted that the group and its security forces continued to bear full responsibility for ensuring the safety of the land.

In a statement, the United Nations special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, Nickolay E. Mladenov, also stressed that Hamas was responsible for enabling the Palestinian government to work without fear of intimidation, harassment and violence.

The Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said, however, that Hamas had no role in the attack. He called the blast an attempt to tamper with the security of the Gaza Strip and to strike any efforts to achieve unity and reconciliation, and demanded an investigation.

Mr. Barhoum instead sought to blame Israel: He suggested those responsible were the same hands who had gunned down Mazen Fakha, a Hamas official responsible for a number of terror attacks, in March 2017, and tried to kill Tawfiq Abu Naim, the head of Hamass security forces in Gaza, in October.

Hamas has accused Israel of being behind the attacks on both men, who were freed from Israeli prisons in 2011 in a controversial prisoner swap for the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

Mr. Abu Naim, inspecting the scene on Tuesday, similarly said the perpetrators had executed what the Israeli occupation demands, but added: We are sorry for what happened to our brothers in the delegation, including the prime minister.

Mr. Hamdallah, seemingly undaunted by the attack, said he remained determined to heal the Fatah-Hamas rift in Gaza.

This will never prevent us from getting rid of the bitter division, he told reporters. I say in spite of the explosion today, this wont stop us carrying on with our mission to achieve unity and end the split.

Roadside bombs in Gaza are a sensitive subject for the Palestinian Authority and particularly for Mr. Abbas, its president, said Grant Rumley, co-author of a biography of Mr. Abbas, The Last Palestinian.

In 2007, several large bombs were planted along the route Mr. Abbas was about to use to attend a meeting with a Hamas leader in Gaza. The bombs were discovered, Mr. Abbas aborted the meeting, and he has not returned to Gaza since, Mr. Rumley said.

The relatively limited damage caused by the bomb on Tuesday gave rise to considerable speculation among analysts and officials in Gaza and beyond about who, beside Hamas, might have had reason to set off the device either as an authentic assassination attempt or, perhaps, to send a message.

In Gazas complex political and factional thicket there was no shortage of other potential suspects: Salafi jihadists, who of late have attacked Hamas about as much as they have attacked Israel; allies of Muhammad Dahlan, the exiled Fatah leader who is reviled by Mr. Abbas but widely seen as a potential successor to him; and the Palestinian Authority itself an embarrassing security lapse could bolster its case that Hamas ought to turn over security control in Gaza to the authority.

Indeed, within hours of the attack and Mr. Hamdallahs return to the West Bank, Palestinian Authority officials were making precisely that argument in local media coverage.

Later, in Washington, Jason Greenblatt, the presidents Middle East envoy, drew a similar conclusion in opening remarks at the White House meeting: This attack, once again, demonstrates that Hamas is profoundly unfit to govern Gaza, Mr. Greenblatt said.

At the blast site in Beit Hanoun, a few hundred yards from the Erez crossing from Israel, windows were shattered in nearby buildings and witnesses reported that a security officer in Mr. Hamdallahs motorcade had been lightly wounded in the face. Investigators at the scene said the explosive device was planted next to a streetlight, and that a second bomb, powered by 9-volt batteries, was found nearby, less than a foot underground.

Police said that security personnel escorting Mr. Hamdallah had shot at four men on two motorcycles who were seen in the area before the blast, and then arrested them as suspects.

The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents. A temporary arrangement between the Palestinian Authority and Israel is supplying power for the plant, but officials are seeking a dedicated electrical line from Israel as a reliable power source.

Power shortages have routinely caused water treatment to cease, allowing raw sewage to seep into the groundwater and flow into the sea, polluting the local water supply and fouling beaches throughout Gaza and along much of the southern Israeli seashore.

Continue reading here:
Blast Hits Palestinian Prime Ministers Convoy in Gaza …

Related Post

March 13, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Gaza |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."