Yet another "hate crime" turns out to be a hoax – Hot Air

This all getting too repetitive at this point. Once again a high profile hate crime involving racist graffiti swept the nation a little over a month ago, creating tremendous excitement in the mainstream media. Were referring to the horrible incident at the Air Force Academy Preparatory School, where five black cadet candidates found racist messages sprayed on message boards outside their dormitory rooms. That kicked off a lengthy investigation and warnings from the schools administration about the need for diversity and all the usual messaging. This served as additional fodder for the SJW crowd, providing proof of what a horrible, racist nation America has become under Trump.

Now, at long last, the mystery has been solved and the hateful racist is being identified. Unfortunately, the perpetrator turned out to be one of the black cadets who was targeted. (Washington Post)

But on Tuesday, the school made a jolting announcement. The person responsible for the racist messages, the academy said, was, in fact, one of the cadet candidates who reported being targeted by them.

The individual admitted responsibility and this was validated by the investigation, academy spokesman Lt. Col. Allen Herritage said in a statement to the Associated Press, adding: Racism has no place at the academy, in any shape or form.

The cadet candidate accused of crafting the messages was not identified, but the Colorado Springs Gazette reported that the individual is no longer enrolled at the school. Sources also told the Gazette the cadet candidate committed the act in a bizarre bid to get out of trouble he faced at the school for other misconduct, the newspaper reported.

Its great that the academy is still reinforcing the message that racism has no place at the academy because thats absolutely true. But it might have been helpful for them to note that this wasnt racism. I dont know how much credence we should give to the former students explanation. Its being claimed that he was attempting to divert attention from other disciplinary action he was facing over performance issues. Perhaps thats the case in this one instance, but most of the time it isnt.

It seems obvious that most of these hoaxes, particularly on college campuses, are designed to perpetuate the image of rampant racism. If you cant find any actual racism to highlight I suppose you have to cook up some on your own. Still, everyone always seems to have an excuse. That black guy in Kansas who claimed that racist graffiti was painted on his car turned out to have done it himself. But he then claimed that it was a Holloween prank that got out of hand.

Pull the other one, Dauntarius. Its got bells on it.

If theres any amusement to be found in this story its the utter puzzlement expressed by the Washington Post reporter as to why someone would possibly do this. You see, the real problem here isnt the people perpetrating the fraud, but the damage being done to the cause.

Its unclear exactly what prompts people to commit these hoaxes, stunts and false reports. But such revelations have become a major concern for civil rights activists who document racist and anti-Semitic incidents, particularly amid a rise in reported hate crimes since the election.

Yes, its all so unclear, isnt it? Its just a mystery for the ages. One couldnt even hazard a guess as to why somebody would do this. The best they can do is craft an explanation like the one used following the other recent hate crime hoax at Kansas State. That one was described as a prank. Oh, it was in very bad taste, of course, but still a prank, right?

The fact is that activists need to have an enemy to battle if they hope to attract the media attention and liberal public sympathy they crave. And if nobody is willing to step up and actually do something racist, an industrious social justice warrior will just have to take matters into their own hands and do it themselves. And then when theyre exposed, what might have been a productive conversation about racial tension (which absolutely still crops up in spots) gets flipped entirely off the rails. Good job, kids.

See the article here:

Yet another "hate crime" turns out to be a hoax – Hot Air

Related Post

December 22, 2017   Posted in: Hate Crime Hoax |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."