‘White Terrorism’ and Donald Trump: Why Has the President Slashed the Grant for Group Combating KKK? – Newsweek

The Trump administration has slashed funding for a group devoted to tackling radical white extremists. The Department for Homeland Security (DHS)announced Fridaythat $400,000 in federal funding was being withdrawn from Chicago-based Life After Hate, one of the few U.S. groups dedicated to combating white nationalism.The group was awarded the grant in the closing days of the Obama administration.

Neo Nazis (National Socialist Movement) take part in a Ku Klux Klan demonstration at the state house building on July 18, 2015 in Columbia, South Carolina. John Moore/Getty Images

Run by a former extremistskinhead, the group helps members of hate groups including the KKK and Neo-Nazi gangs to build a life beyond racist nationalism.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

The co-founder of Life After Hate, Christian Picciolini, told the Associated Press, “While it’s disappointing that DHS broke its promise to us by changing the rules to the grant after we’d already won it, it is more alarming that the current administration is refusing to acknowledge that white nationalist extremists are a major domestic terrorist threat.”

Oren Siegel, director of the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League criticized the move in a tweet,linkingto a Time article in which he accusedthe administration of underestimating the threat posed by far-right terrorists.

The new list of grant recipients doesn’t include a single organization dedicated to fighting far-right extremism but several that are focused oncountering Islamic extremism.

Reuters reported in February that administration officials were debating changing the name of the Countering Violent Extremism program to Countering Islamic Extremism or Countering Radical Islamic Extremism.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claims there has been a significant spike in hate crimes since Trump launched his bid to become president in 2015, when he received considerable backing from the alt-righta loose collection of white nationalist and anti-establishment conservatives.

Heidi Beirich , director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center said in a statement toNewsweek:The Trump administration doesn t take seriously the threat from the radical right.”

Beirich warned that the U.S. would pay a high price for “wishing away” a movement that, according to the Government Accountability Office, was responsible for 73 percent of deadly terrorist attacks since Sept. 11 2001.

The administration wants Americans to believe the only threat that exists to our democratic way of life comes from Islamist-inspired terror. But the facts and history of our country disprove that utterly. This is a dangerous approach.

Earlierin June, a white nationalist allegedly killed two men who stepped in to defend a woman in a train near Portland being subjected to Islamophobic abuse.

In a statement to Mother Jones, the DHL denied it was cutting funding for Life After Hate because of its opposition to the far-right.

DHS used its discretion…when reviewing each applicant said DHS spokeswoman Lucy Martinez, considering different factors in awarding the grants.

The program has not been altered to focus on any one type of violent extremism, she added.

See the article here:

‘White Terrorism’ and Donald Trump: Why Has the President Slashed the Grant for Group Combating KKK? – Newsweek

Related Post

June 24, 2017   Posted in: Heidi Beirich |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."