Poland approves draft Holocaust law | Euronews

Polish lawmakers have approved draft legislation penalising suggestions of complicity by Poland in the Nazi Holocaust on its soil during World War Two.

Violators could face three years in prison for a mention of ‘Polish death camps’.

Some experts believe the new law could have the opposite effect and highlight Poland’s collaboration with the Nazi regime.

“It is unacceptable for me, an historian and a liberal person, to threaten someone with prison because he or she gives his or her opinion based on research,” says Hungarian historian, Laszlo Karsai. “Polish lawmakers are using the ‘Turkish’ way. They are faking their own history. You can get three years in prison if you say there was an Armenian genocide in Turkey.”

The ruling Law and Justice party has a nationalist agenda and has reignited debate on the issue as part of a campaign to fuel patriotism.

Andras Domany, a Hungarian journalist and expert in Polish politics, believes the government is using history for its own political means.

“History is not considered a science by the Polish government, it is a tool for national awareness,” he says. “They want to cut all discussion on how some Polish people collaborated with the Nazi regime or participated in killing Jews.”

Germany occupied Poland in 1939 and later built death camps, including Auschwitz and Treblinka, on Polish soil.

Visit link:
Poland approves draft Holocaust law | Euronews

Related Post

February 1, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Holocaust |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."