Hobby Lobby fined $3 million for artifacts smuggled from Iraq – Washington Post

Hobby Lobby has agreed to forfeit thousands of illegally smuggled ancient Iraqi artifacts, the company and the Department of Justice said on July 5. (Amber Ferguson/The Washington Post)

The arts-and-crafts retailer Hobby Lobby has agreed to pay a $3 million fine for illegally importing thousands of ancient clayartifacts smuggled into the United States from Iraq, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

In addition to the fine, Hobby Lobby will forfeitthousands of clay bullae, cuneiform tablets and cylinder sealsthat were falsely labeled andshipped to the companythrough the United Arab Emirates and Israel,according toa civil complaint and settlement agreement in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Cuneiform is an ancient writing system that involvedcarving inscriptions into clay or stone. Cylinder seals were used to roll impressions into clay. Clay bullae are balls of clay with seals imprinted on the surface, used toshow a documents authenticity.

The Oklahoma-based company bought more than 5,500artifacts for $1.6 million in December 2010 from an unidentified dealer in an acquisition prosecutors said was fraught with red flags. According to the complaint, Hobby Lobby got conflicting information about where the artifacts had been stored and never met or communicated with the dealer selling them. When it came time to pay, the company wired money to sevenseparate bank accounts.

American collectors and importers must ensure compliance with laws and regulations that require truthful declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, so that Customs officers are able to scrutinize cultural property crossing our borders and prevent the inappropriate entry of such property, acting U.S. attorney Bridget M. Rohde said in a statement.

Hobby Lobby, whose owners are evangelical Christians, said it began collectinga variety of Bibles and other artifacts several years ago with the goal of preserving them for future generations. In a statementWednesday, the company said it did not fully appreciate the complexities of the acquisitions process and relied on dealers who did not understand how to properly ship the items.

We should have exercised more oversight and carefully questioned how the acquisitions were handled, Hobby Lobby President Steve Green said in the statement.

Hobby Lobbys ownersportray their companyas a Christian business and are known for supporting Christian causes. Green is one of the driving forces behind the Museum of the Bible,a 430,000-square-foot facility in Washington, D.C., that is set to open in the fall and will reportedly house thousands of biblical artifacts and texts.

In 2014, Hobby Lobby becamea symbol in debate over religious freedom after it prevailed in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that found family-owned corporations donot have to pay for contraception coverage under the Affordable Care Act if it violates their sincerely held religious beliefs.

According to the complaint, Hobby Lobby begancollecting a range of historically significant manuscripts and other antiquities in 2009. The following July, Green traveled with a consultant to the United Arab Emirates, where they inspecteda large cache of cuneiform tablets and other artifacts.

Two Israeli antiquities dealers and one from the United Arab Emirates attended the July 2010 inspection with Hobby Lobbys president and consultant.At the meeting, the complaint says,the artifacts were displayed informally, spread on the floor, arranged in layers on a coffee table, and packed loosely in cardboard boxes, in many instances with little or no protective material between them.

The dealers said the items were from the family collection ofa third dealer who was not present, according to the complaint. They later sent Hobby Lobby a provenance statement a guarantee of authenticity indicating that the artifacts were legally acquired in the 1960s from local markets.

After returning to the United States, the complaint says, Hobby Lobbys president and in-house lawyer spoke with an expert on cultural property law who warned them that antiquitiesfrom ancient Iraqmay have been looted from archaeological sites. In a memo, the expert told them that any items of Iraqi originthat were not properly declared could be seized by customs officials.

Hobby Lobby proceeded with the sale. Starting in late 2010, a United Arab Emirates-based dealer sent 10 packages to three different Hobby Lobby addresses in Oklahoma City, with shipping labels reading ceramic tiles or clay tiles (sample), according to the complaint. No formal entries were made for theshipments. Prosecutors said the use of multiple addresses was consistent with methods used by cultural property smugglers to avoid scrutiny by Customs.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection later intercepted five additional packages, all of them falsely declaring that the artifacts inside came from Turkey when they in fact came from Iraq. A final shipment containing about 1,000 clay bullae arrived at one of Hobby Lobbys addresses from Israel in September 2011. That one also misrepresented the artifacts country of origin, according to the complaint.

Angel M. Melendez, aU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement special agent, said in a statement Wednesday: While some may put a price on these artifacts, the people of Iraq consider them priceless.

More from Morning Mix

The Bronx mourns a good cop, a neighbor and mother of three

Tupac told Madonna he broke up with her due to race, newly surfaced letter reveals

Comedian organizing man-free music fest until they learn how to behave

Read the rest here:
Hobby Lobby fined $3 million for artifacts smuggled from Iraq – Washington Post

Related Post

July 6, 2017   Posted in: Iraq |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."