Haaretz Editor: I’m Anti-Zionist and Yes, Israel=Apartheid …

Yes, you read that headline right.

In a series of Tweets, Asaf Ronel,world news editor of Haaretz, declared that he is an anti-Zionist. No, hes not some off-the-wall opinion writer thrown into the newspaper for shock value: hes the worldnews editor.

Ronelfollowed up his initial statement (above) by calling apartheid in Israel reality, and clarifying that such apartheid began in 1948.

In case you dont have Twitter, or in the event this conversation gets subsequently deleted, you can follow some of theconversation in these screen shots:

The anti-Israel activist agenda at Haaretz is not limited to its international news editor: HonestReporting previously addressedthe statements of the newspapers owner, Amos Schocken that Haaretz is striving not for objective and accurate reporting but for promoting a political and campaigning agenda.

News breaks fast. GetHonestReporting alerts by e-mail and never miss a thing.

Free Sign Up

Zionism is commonly understood to be the support for Jewish self-determination in the land of Israel. Which begs the question, if Ronel opposes Zionism, is there any way to understand his statementsother than that he opposes the existence of Israel, or at least the existence of a Jewish homeland in Israel? And if Ronel represents the editorial policy of Haaretz, is there any possible conclusion other than that it is Haaretz policy to oppose Israels very existence?

The person debating against Ronel in the above Twitter conversation is Dr. Emmanuel Navon,an International Relations expert who teaches at Tel-Aviv University and at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Centerand is a Senior Fellow at the Kohelet Policy Forum. Navon weighed in on the topic saying:

What is the difference between blaming the Jewish people and blaming the Jewish state for the worlds ills?

and:

Denying sovereignty only to the Jews is discriminatory. So is saying that only Jewish sovereignty intrinsically immoral.

Mainstream Israeli journalist Haviv Rettig Gur (Senior Analyst for Times of Israel) also weighed in via Twitter:

Gur adds on his Facebook page in relevant part:

Something dishonest is happening at Haaretz, and its a damn shame. We need a progressive voice in this country that doesnt let itself turn into a fawning parrot for the latest anti-Zionist fashion abroad, but speaks to us Israelis, to our experience and concerns, and tries to convince us its vision is better. Thats not Haaretz, at least not anymore.

Asaf even took a crack at HonestReporting in the following tweet:

In light of Ronels reply invoking the concept of free speech, we simply have to ask: if the best you can say about your writing is that it isnt outright illegal, isnt that setting the bar a little low for a professional journalist?

Put another way, just because youhavethe right to say something, that doesnt mean youare right to say it.

Of course, Ronel is not even a journalist at all: by his own admission, he is really an agenda driven activist. And while free speech means that disguising activism as journalism cannot get you thrown in jail, it should certainly get you thrown out of a newspaper office.

Unlikecommentary or opinion writing, a professionalnews editor must embody the values of openness and impartiality. This is essential in orderto convey accurate information to news readers. Can an anti-Zionist editor who believes Israel is an apartheid state really be capable of reporting on Israel in a manner that is accurate and impartial?

Unfortunately, foreign news outlets often quote Haaretz, misrepresenting it asa mainstream Israeli voice, even though Haaretzscirculation isonly 3.9% of Israeli news readers. This gives news readers around the world an inaccurate understanding of Israel and of Israelis.

Haaretzs ownership and international news editors not only fail to embody the values of professional journalism, but are publicly statingthat they do not even wish to. There is nothing wrong with having a personal agenda, but disguising an agenda as journalism, is misleading and harmful to news audiences, as wellto the news profession itself.

Simon Plosker, HRs Managing Editor, comments:

While a tenacious and free Israeli media are a vital part of Israels democracy, Haaretz, and particularly its English-language site, plays a significant role in the demonization of Israel. Many foreign journalists find the most negative stories to publish straight from Haaretz. Its time that they acknowledge that Haaretz is wholly unrepresentative of Israel and Israeli society. This appalling rant by Asaf Ronel on Twitter is further confirmation of Haaretzs openly hateful agenda that permeates from editorial all the way to its owner Amos Schocken.

In short, if Haaretz truly cannot bring itself to start behaving like an actual newspaper, then it should stop calling itself one. Perhaps the Haaretz Anti-Zionism Advocacy Organization, would be a good name. At least it would be honest.

While you’re here, help us continue producing the analyses, articles, videos and hot news reaching thousands of viewers and holding the media accountable. Support us by Donating Here

See the original post here:

Haaretz Editor: I’m Anti-Zionist and Yes, Israel=Apartheid …

Related Post

February 2, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Israel Apartheid |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."