Pro-Palestinian Groups Compare Chris Rocks Show in Israel …

Chris Rock performs his stand-up comedy routine during a stop of his Total Blackout Tour on June 10, 2017, in Las Vegas. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Much to the dismay of pro-Palestinian groups, it looks like Chris Rock will be following through on a scheduled performance in Tel Aviv, Israel.

Following months of urging from activists and fans to cancel the Jan. 9 performance, Rock is currently in Tel Aviv for the next stop of his stand-up Total Blackout Tour. The Electronic Intifada, a Chicago-based website that covers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, reports that nearly 4,000 people signed a petition asking Rock to boycott apartheid Israel.

A group of 20 Palestinian performing arts organizations also wrote Rock an open letter pleading with him to reconsider his show in Tel Aviv, likening the event to performing in apartheid South Africa.

The letter, which was published on the Palestinian human rights website BDS Movement (the BDS stands for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions), references the renowned comics history of speaking out against racial injustice.

You were born into a society which spelled out with brutal clarity and in as many ways as possible

The letter writers also note that although Rock may never explicitly condone Israels treatment of Palestine, his show would be used by the Israeli government as a tacit endorsement:

As the recent performance by Radiohead, in defiance of Palestinian and international appeals, has lucidly shown, what matters most is not whether artists performing in Tel Aviv support Israels grave crimes against the Palestinian people or not but how Israel will irrespectively use their performances to portray a false image for itself, covering up its human rights violations.

Dozens of tweets from Israeli officials and Israel lobby groups, as well as US right-wing pundits, gloated over Radioheads decision to violate the cultural boycott, with a leading right-wing Israeli newspaper describing the bands decision to cross the Palestinian boycott picket line as the best gift of hasbara [propaganda] Israel has received lately. Israel, after all, sees culture as a hasbara tool of the first rank, as a ranking Israeli official once admitted.

The letter compares the current cultural boycott of Israel to those that occurred during the time when the fight against Jim Crow laws was at its peak. It also lists notable entertainers and speakers who have decided to avoid any engagement in Israel, like Angela Davis, Alice Walker, Lauryn Hill and Archbishop Desmond Tutu:

Of the twenty six Oscar nominees in 2016, none has accepted an all-expense-paid Israeli propaganda junket, and out of eleven NFL players, six turned down a similar offer by the Israeli government in 2017.

The open letter ends with a comparison to Black Lives Matter in the U.S., which Rock has openly supported:

We take to heart Baldwins advice to his nephew, Please try to remember that what they believe, as well as what they do and cause you to endure, does not testify to your inferiority, but to their inhumanity and fear. We shall continue to resist Israels dehumanization of us just as the Movement for Black Lives resists racial violence and institutionalized oppression in the US.

The conflict between Israel and Palestine has entered into a state of uncertainty in recent months as a two-state solution over control of the West Bank seems less and less viable.

It will be Rocks first appearance in Israel, according to the Jerusalem Post. He will play at the Menora Mivtachim Arena with fellow comedian Jeffrey Ross as his opening act.

Read the original here:

Pro-Palestinian Groups Compare Chris Rocks Show in Israel …

Related Post

February 2, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Israel Apartheid |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."