Israel Objects To Polish Holocaust Law | The Daily Caller

Israel and Poland have agreed to diplomatic talks about the controversy surrounding a proposed Polish law that would outlaw blaming Poland for Nazi atrocities committed on its soil during World War II, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday night.

Passed by the lower house of the Polish parliament Friday, the bill would make it illegal to suggest the Polish state or people were responsible for the murder of Jews in the Holocaust. The proposal has not yet become law it still has to be approved by the Polish senate andPresident Andrzej Duda but Israeli officials have denounced it as legal sanction for distorting history.

Israel has no tolerance for the distortion of the truth, the rewriting of history and the denial of the Holocaust, Netanyahu said at his weekly cabinet meeting Sunday, according to the Associated Press.

Earlier Sunday, the Israeli Foreign Ministry summoned Polands charge dAffaires Piotr Kozlowski to officially express displeasure with the bill. Netanyahu followed up with a call toPolish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, during which they agreed hear out Israeli objections to the legislation.

The two agreed that teams from the two countries would open an immediate dialogue in order to try to reach understandings regarding the legislation, Netanyahus office said in a statement.


Before WWII, Poland was home to roughly 3.2 million Jews, the largest Jewish community in Europe. Nazis invaded and occupied Poland in 1939 and eventually built some of their most notorious death camps there, including Auschwitz and Treblinka. Historians have said that some Polish people collaborated with the Nazis and enabled the extermination of Polish Jews.

The Polish government says the proposed blame bill is not intended to whitewash history or limit freedom to research or speak about the Holocaust. Rather, the legislation seeks to codify the nationalist governments position that the Polish state and people were also victims of Nazi terror, according to the bills sponsors.

We will not change any provisions in the bill, said Beata Mazurek, spokeswoman for the ruling conservative-nationalist Law and Justice party, according to the AP. We have had enough of Poland and Poles being blamed for German crimes.

It is already against the law in Poland to deny that the Holocaust happened.

Yad Vashem, Israels Holocaust remembrance center, said it is historically inaccurate to describe Auschwitz and other Nazi camps in Poland as Polish death camps. But the proposed bill is liable to blur the historical truths regarding the assistance the Germans received from the Polish population, the organization said, according to Reuters.

Israeli officials were also angered by the surprising and unfortunate timing of the Holocaust bill, which was passed a day before International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Follow Will on Twitter

Send tips to [emailprotected].

View post:
Israel Objects To Polish Holocaust Law | The Daily Caller

Related Post

January 30, 2018   Posted in: Israel |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."