Jewish extremism – Opinion – Jerusalem Post

Anyone attending a mixed-gender prayer service at Robinsons Arch of the Western Wall could be sentenced to six months in jail, if a bill to establish Orthodoxy as the only recognized religion at Judaisms holiest site, proposed by Shas, should become law.

Not only would common practice among millions of Diaspora Jewry be banned, but within the existing womens section, there shall be not be allowed any ceremony that includes taking out a Torah scroll, reading from it, blowing a shofar, wearing a tallit or tefillin.

The bill would in effect make the Western Wall an Orthodox synagogue by law.

Lawmakers from two haredi parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism, as well as the Likuds Oren Hazan, David Amsalem and Miki Zohar and Bayit Yehudis Bezalel Smotrich, Moti Yogev and Nissan Slomiansky, have endorsed the far-reaching proposal, which would make Orthodoxy the law throughout the entire Western Wall area.

The bill would also reverse the cabinets decision to provide an area for egalitarian worship at Robinsons Arch, where it pledged to build a prayer plaza for Reform and Conservative Jews. Its construction has been frozen since it was announced in January to great acclaim, due to coalition threats by the haredi political parties.

The bill is part of a crusade against the Reform Movement being led by Interior Minister Arye Deri.

As he told reporters: You must know that any recognition or compromise with the Reform means a recognition of their way as a stream in Judaism. Our struggle against them is uncompromising. They bring assimilation and destruction.

In other words, in the Israeli version of democracy, a minister in the government of the Jewish state may promote a law discriminating against the religious practices of the great majority of American Jewry.

That such an absurd proposal could be taken seriously, and be supported by so many right-wing politicians as well as ultra-Orthodox ministers, is a sign of how religious extremism is growing at a dangerous pace in our country.

The Shas bill would make it official that Israels democracy is also a theocracy. Jewish Agency Chairman Natan Sharansky thinks it could put Israel on the same level as Iran: If it passes, he told The Jerusalem Post, it means that Israel will become the first Western country where a woman who wears a tallit will be punished and sent to six months in jail.

This bill makes a mockery of all the efforts made by recent governments to ensure that the Western Wall is a place that unites, rather than divides, the Jewish people, said Sharansky, who negotiated the Robinsons Arch compromise, in a statement.

This bills passage would have grave consequences for the relationship between Israel and Diaspora Jewry. Based on the prime ministers strong personal commitment to strengthening the Israel-Diaspora relationship, it is my fervent hope that this damaging bill will be summarily dismissed by a majority of the coalition and of the Knesset.

There were at least two Knesset members to sound the alarm at this manifestation of Jewish extremism, Michael Oren and Rachel Azaria of Kulanu. This bill is a mortal blow for relations between the State of Israel and Jewish communities around the world, they said in a joint statement.

Many people speak about Reform Jews the way antisemites speak about the Elders of Zion, Sharansky told the Post. I found that there are unbelievable prejudices against Reform Jews. If Israeli leaders from the prime minister on down will not start trying to de-demonize our own people, then we will have a big problem.

The big problem one of Israels biggest is the death grip in which the state holds the practice of Judaism. Israel cannot be the only democracy in the Middle East or a true democracy as long as its citizens lack the freedom to worship as they please. The Shas bill, which we hope will not pass into law, is a warning signal that the time has come to separate religion and state, for the sake of both.

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

Think others should know about this? Please share

| |

Original post:

Jewish extremism – Opinion – Jerusalem Post

Related Post

December 18, 2016   Posted in: Jewish Extremism |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."