The Jewish State Terror Attack on Jewish Workers’ Rights in Israel – New Democrats (press release) (blog)

News : Israeli High Court signals end of right to strike at state-owned enterprises

The High Court of Justice in Israel has issued a preliminary ruling that workers at state-owned enterprisescan no longer strike against market reforms being undertaken by the government. Accepting the governments argument that strikes against government policy are politically motivated and thus illegal under their law, the high court has overturned its earlier order upholding the right to strike. This order allows the government to privatise the electricity sector while endangering the immediate employment of 12500 workers. If confirmed, it will also severely curtail the rights of Israeli workers.

The Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) employs 12,500 workers. For the past three years, the government has instituted a so-called market reform programme to end the state monopoly on electricity generation.

The privatization plan means the company will stop generating electricity and sell its power stations to the private sector. The so-called reforms have already cost 800 jobs. The Histadrut expects the privatization to result in between 5,000 and 6,000 job losses. Workers at IEC took part in industrial action in June and July, including refusing to issue electric bills.

In May 2017, the High Court upheld early judgements by regional and national labour courts in support of the right to strike. However, the government appealed the ruling, claiming that because the strikers oppose government policy, the strike is political and therefore illegal under Israeli labour law. The government was supported by private electric corporations, who argued that strikes should not be allowed to influence, harm or cause financial loss.

IndustriALL Global Union is very concerned about the possibility of imposing serious restrictions on the right to strike. We believe such an outcome would be against the International Covenant on Economic, Social and cultural Rights, as well as against ILOs Convention 87 concerning freedom of association and protection of the right to organize, and ILOs Convention 98 concerning the application of the principles of the right to organize and to bargain collectively.

Views :

The Israel state and Jewish lobby in US portray Palestine as the enemy of Jewish people. This ruling shows who the real enemies are all the working people. The government of Israel, like governments all over the world, serves the interests of financial elite who want that strikes should not be allowed to influence, harm or cause financial loss. The workers democratic rights take a back seat.

Like Loading…

Go here to see the original:

The Jewish State Terror Attack on Jewish Workers’ Rights in Israel – New Democrats (press release) (blog)

Related Post

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Jewish Lobby |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."