The truth about the Gestapo John de Nugent

The Jews defames Hitler, his Third Reich and his National Socialists with four horrible accusations:

1) Hitler was supposedly a war-loving, racist, genocidal, dictatorial madman

.

.

2) the Holocaust six million innocent Jews, they say, were murdered, and five million others

3) the SS -they claim, carried out the mass murders and ran the concentration camps

.

.

4) the Gestapo they say, tortured prisoners and resistance fighters

.

To the best of my knowledge, before Vincent Reynouard no one has EVER logically dismantled the lies against the German police service called the Gestapo!

.

Now, here it is!

.

I met Klaus Barbies daughter in Kufstein, Austria in the 1980s, and I am so glad that her fathers war service HARSH BUT VITAL can now be defended.

.

Kufstein, Tyrol, Austria

I got training myself as an interrogator while in the US Marine Corps Reserve 1977-79 (the then 35th ITT, Interrogator-Translator Team, located at the Washington DC Navy Yard and then at Anacostia Naval Air Station).

It is the rankest hypocrisy for the USA, with a LONG HISTORY OF TORTURE ITSELF, which by no means began with Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, or with Guantanamo, or the CIA rendition flights, to point the finger at the Gestapo and the Third Reich over this issue. And both Obama and Bush are FOR torture, as their ACTIONS show.

Dog snarls at hooded, shackled, kneeling Iraqi prisoner at Abu Ghraib; Ernst Zndel experienced this in a Tennessee jail!!!!!!

Fed employee Lyndie English and humiliated prisoners

Israeli guard at Abu Ghraib

Some sort of vise-like device

In the British version of Abu Ghraib, prisoners were beaten to death and slit open.

Prisoner smeared with mud and blood must prance about like an opera star.

Guantanamo front gate

Forced-feeding chair with straps

Blindfolded, kneeling, hearing-deprived, and in stress positions

.

.

Already kept at home for three months with an electronic bracelet, suddenly Vincent was arrested and taken to this prison in Forest, Belgium for forty days to live alongside the local criminals White, Arab, Jewish and negro drug dealers and pimps.

.

.

Reynouard spent almost a year in Valenciennes prison 2010-11, but more charges may be piled on, and both he and his companion were arrested again (early 2014), and his video equipment, computer and DVD burner were seized.

.

.

I said no one has touched the Gestapo topic. I wish to promote this work byReynouard very strongly. When I translated about 10 pages into English myself, and put it on this blog, everyone begged for more.

And I find it incredibly courageous of Vincent Reynouard, especially as a Frenchman (just think of how Hollywood via such movies as Casablanca promoted the Resistance) to defend the Gestapo. This is just as brave and principled as his defending of the Waffen-SS over Oradour, where the lie is that the SS men massacred 500 French civilians. Every French kid is brainwashed with Oradour ad infinitum as proof of of le barbarisme nazi. like American kids are indoctrinated to worship Martin Luther King and see the Confederacy and the Klan as pure evil.

These are two sacred cows of la France resistante specifically, 1) the Oradour massacre and 2) the evil Gestapo and its head in France, Klaus Barbie, the butcher of Lyons, who supposedly tortured the Resistance heroes.

(My second wife, who was French, was a daughter of rsistants de la premire heure, resistants from the first hour, i.e., from 1940 on.)

The latest horror is that the French police and Belgian police seem to be fishing for NEW charges to lay on Reynouard. (As I suspected, they did the same with Gerd Honsik, getting him into prison on one charge, then adding two more trials and two more sentences once he was in! Honsik did five years for his WRITINGS!

Reynouard was a brave national socialist from the beginning; here a headline about one of his many arrests: [Holohoax] Denier in Brussels Arrested

And it appears that his fellow Austrian, Wolfgang Frhlich (an engineer like Reynouard), already serving six years, also got two more years added on!

Now you see the full sadism of the Jew, piling on the suffering, higher and higher, who not long ago attempted to have Richard Scutari, a key member of the revolutionary Order in the USA, transferred to an ultra-harsh new super-max regime with no visits except from family and no Movement literature DESPITE 25 YEARS OF PERFECT CONDUCT. (It appears that this attempt failed, however.)

Here is Reynouard on French-Belgian TV in 2007:

.

.

Even without understanding la langue de lamour you can figure out what is happening. The blue-eyed bimbette is reporting breathlessly that her TV channel is doing a big, brave expos of the extreme rightwinger living in their innocent, previously hate-free Belgian capital city of Brussels. (And it is hate-free, except for muslim gangs-raping white women. If you dont resent that atrocity, all is wonderful. Have some more Belgian chocolate and drink your strawberry-syrup beer.)

So they go to his door to confront him. (I and Margi have been in and out that very door. We stayed with the nearly saintly VR and his adorable family for almost three days. They had to cook, then a family of eight now ten on ONE hotplate, because not enough comrades support them, and washed their dishes in the bathtub! Shame and black karma on all who do not support such heroes!)

Here now is Margarets two-part article summarizing the research by Vincent Reynouard in his magazine Sans Concession in defense of the Gestapo:

Margi herself is part French-Canadian-Acadian, descended from the Falgouts.

Ge-sta-po. Three syllables that evoke the shadowy spectre of an omnipresent, omnipotent and arbitrary monster; brutal arrests, violence and torture. Sinister figures Himmler, Barbie. . .

Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS and the German Police

But does this officially endorsed and endlessly invoked image correspond to reality? Vincent Reynouard wanted to find out for himself. In order to do this, he went to the source: he consulted the transcripts of the Nuremberg Trials and of the trials that took place in France starting in December, 1944, of the auxiliaries of the German police in the Occupied Territories.

Dont judge before you have heard both sides, wrote Phocylides of Miletus in the sixth century BC.

.adds an Icelandic proverb. Vincent Reynouard put these wise teachings into practice. He listened to the defense. In doing so he made unexpected discoveries, discoveries that call into question some fundamental tenets of the official history.

To share his findings Reynouard published a two-part article in in the December 2006 and February-March 2007 issues of his Revisionist journal Sans Concession, entitled The Truth about the Gestapo, which has since been translated into English by Revisionist Carlos Whitlock Porter and can be found in its entirety on his website at http://www.cwporter.com/articles.htm.

A typical issue back then of Sans Concession magazine

The first part, on the subject of the Gestapo in Germany from April 1933 to September 1939, is far shorter (53 pages out of a total of 158) than the second, which deals with the Gestapo in German-occupied France.

That is because, while the situation in the Occupied Territories was extremely complex, requiring in-depth analysis of many factors and a multiplicity of examples, the non-criminality of the Gestapo in the pre-war period is an open and shut case, as Reynouard skilfully demonstrates.

Part I the Gestapo in Germany 1933 1939

At the post World War II International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei = Secret State Police) was one of many organizations collectively indicted under Articles 9 and 10 of the London Charter, in which the Tribunal gave itself the power to designate an organization as criminal and then indict members merely on the basis of their belonging to said organization.

Reichssicherheitshauptamt (Reich Security Headquarters)

on Prinz Albrecht St. in the Charlottenburg section of Berlin

In his opening address the United States chief prosecutor Robert Jackson set the tone for six and a half decades (and counting) of anti-Gestapo invective, by declaring:

Through the police formations that are before you accused as criminal organizations, the Nazi Party leaders. . .instituted a reign of terror. These espionage and police organizations were utilized to hunt down every form of opposition and to penalize all nonconformity. [IMT II, 128]

His assistant Commander Frank B. Wallis chimed in, denouncing the Gestapo as . . . the vicious tools used in the extermination of all opposition, real or potential [IMT II, 193].

Political police forces existed in Germany before 1933

The Gestapo was ably defended at Nuremberg by Rudolf Merkel, who began his defense by dispelling the notion that the Gestapo was a terrorist organization created out of thin air to serve the criminal needs of the Hitler regime, as was frequently claimed for example, by the left-wing French weekly Le Combat, which wrote in 1939 :

The Weimar Republic had thought it unnecessary to create a political police force. Hitlers first concern, upon his accession to power, on 30 January 1933, was to repair this error. [Notre combat, n 13, 15 December 1939, issue entitled: La Gestapo: ses origines, ses chefs, son organization, p. 1].

As Merkel pointed out, this claim could not be more wrong. Not only had a very active and effective police existed during the Weimar Republic, but their main focus of attention (with the Communist party a close second) had been the National Socialist Party! The difference between the pre-1933 political police and the Gestapo, as former Gestapo head Karl Best testified at Nuremberg, was merely that, rather than answering to a central authority, these political police systems . . . in the individual German states . . . were created by the various state governments concerned [IMT XX, 124].

All that Goering did in April of 1933, in creating the Gestapo, was to reorganize and centralize the existing political police forces. In fact, the vast majority of officers in the various branches of the new service were simply retained from the Weimar times. Why did Goering do this? As he testified at Nuremberg;

I took a great number of functionaries [into the newly created Gestapo]. who were not political at all, simply because of their knowledge of the technical aspects of the work; at the beginning I chose very few people from Party circles because for the time being I had to attach the greatest importance to professional ability. [IMT IX, 256].

Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering

In support of Grings testimony, former local Gestapo head Karl Hoffmann stated that most of the members of his service were employees who had entered the police before 1933 and had been detailed or transferred to the State Police. The proportion of volunteers who entered after 1933 only reached at most 10 % or 15 % of effective staff.(!)

This is a far cry from the claim in the Nuremberg indictment that the functionaries and agents of the newly-created police force were selected in accordance with Nazi biological, racial, and political theories, completely indoctrinated in Nazi ideology [IMT I, 82].

The Gestapo was not an arm of the NSDAP

Thus the Gestapo was not an arm of the NSDAP, as is frequently implied or alleged, but a perfectly ordinary state police force, such as virtually all countries have. Its objective, as set out in the Preamble of the decree reorganizing and unifying the German police, was to: protect the German people from any attempts at destruction by interior and exterior enemies.

It is often claimed that members of the Gestapo were members of the SS, as evidence that they were indeed a Nazi organization and it is true that during the war some members of the Gestapo received a post in the SS, with the corresponding rank and uniform. However, as revealed in Nuremberg Trial testimony, the objective was solely to reinforce the authority of ordinary acting officials, and did not imply political or ideological affiliation:

The reason for this assimilation was the following: . . . civil servants were . . . not particularly respected by the Party. . . because of their political, or non-political, past. In order to strengthen their authority in the discharge of their duties, in particular when acting against National Socialists, they were to appear in uniform. [IMT XXI, 506]

In fact, their SS rank had no practical effect on the functions of Gestapo members their duties and the chain of command remained the same. Likewise, when SS members joined the Gestapo, as sometimes happened (contingent upon passing an examination to which all candidates were subject), they were henceforth considered civil servants, and operated within the Gestapo hierarchy.

Why create the Gestapo?

Read more from the original source:

The truth about the Gestapo John de Nugent

Related Post

July 28, 2016   Posted in: John de Nugent |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."