Journalists Fall for Fake ‘Far Cry 5’ Petition, Bash Video Gamers as Dangerous Racists – Heat Street

A fake petition demanding the cancellation of Far Cry 5 surfaced a few days ago, expressing anger at the games apparent portrayal of white American religious extremists as villains. With fewer than a dozen signatures, no one took notice of the petition, and it wouldve been buried until it was shared in game-journalist circleswhere it blew up and spawned almost two dozen news articles about heh, gamers being racist basement dwellers, just like Hillary Clinton always assumed.

The petition begins with a complaint about Ubisofts multicultural lectures and ragesat preachy games aimed at degenerates and miscegenators. It reads like a parody. Thats because it is.

Posted as an open letter, it calls for the games developer, Ubisoft, to cancel the game or change it to include violence against Muslims and inner city gangs instead of American Christians. It also calls for the developer to change the Montana setting to Canada.

Of course, in the game itself, the bad guys arent Christians at alltheyre cultists, like the Branch Davidians. They even use a symbol inspired by the Church of Scientology. Furthermore, an expanded version of Far Cry 5s rogues gallery includes a black man in what many assumed was a white-nationalist Christian organization.

The obviously fake petition even throws in a mention of GamerGate, the consumer-driven movement for ethics in games journalism, and has a line about the continued rejection of romantic partners when they find out our hobby. Theres even a threat of violent repercussions against Ubisoft should they choose to leave the game unaltered.

To top it off, the author misattributes a quote by neo-Nazi pedophile Kevin Alfred Strom to Voltaire, misspelled as Boltair. Classic.

Its a very stupid hoaxbut its one that allows game journalists to pen ludicrous articles taking the letter at face value, as an example of entitled, and deranged video game players who play too much Call of Duty. The bait is taken and it feeds their narrative.

While several publications noted the possibility that it was a product of trolls, sites like the International Business Times and Digital Trends wasted no time decrying disgruntled gamers with articles that took the petition at face value. GameReactor blamed alt-right nationalists for the post.

On Twitter, video game diversity consultant Tanya DePass wrote a long rant about how the treatment of the petition by game journalists, who used it to mock gamers, were simply not treating it seriously enough.

People keep loling at the line about not being to get laid/dates but fear of violence from rejected dudes is legit, she wrote, and insisted that entitled gamers playing oppression olympics aint never going to be funny to me.

Muslim game developer Rami Ismail says he bookmarked the petition to cite in future arguments. Bookmarking this beauty for when I get told Im being too sensitive & too offended by Muslim antagonists in games, he wrote. Reminder: if you cant tell if something is or isnt satire, it might as well be true, because it is clearly credible.

An obvious hoax is clearly credible because we live in the post-truth age, apparently.

James Paley, who covered the story on Cogconnected,admitted he knew the story was a hoax but published it anyway. Thats something I hoped readers would discover on their own, moments after reading the petition in question, he said.

Writing for Mashable, Adam Rosenberg was no better, and acknowledged the possibility of it being written by a troll, but stated it was worth engaging.

Doubling down on the false narrative, game journalist Susan Arendt attacked people who claimed it was fake. She wrote:

Her tweets were not well-received.

Ian Miles Cheong is a journalist and outspoken media critic. You can reach him through social media at@stillgray on Twitterand onFacebook.

Read more from the original source:

Journalists Fall for Fake ‘Far Cry 5’ Petition, Bash Video Gamers as Dangerous Racists – Heat Street

Related Post

June 1, 2017   Posted in: Kevin Alfred Strom |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."