9/11 Bill Maher vs Mos Def – YouTube

Bill Maher tries to talk fiction again, but Mos Def isn’t fooled.my new channel http://www.youtube.com/user/FlexEffect21

three of the most obvious reasons you know it was a flase flag operation:

1 – israeli mossad were arrested that day on the George Washington Bridge with a truck full of explosives (then later released back to israel)

2 – jet fuel (kerosene) doesn’t melt steel in oxygen

3 – they fell like a controlled demolition

Who were the people arrested on the George Washington Bridge & what did they have in their van?Can Jet Fuel (kerosene) melt steal?Was Norad told to stand down?How can you look at the way the 3 world trade center buildings fell & not see controlled demolition?What caused building 7 to fall?Where did the nano thermite come from?Do you know about Operation Northwoods?Do you know about the Lavon Affair?

high profile people who have acknowledged the ISRAELI MOSSAD involvement in the 9/11 attacks

I can list several off the top of my head:

former head of the US ARMY WAR COLLEGE, Dr Alan Sabroskyformer PRESIDENT OF ITALY, Francesco Cossigaformer MI5 agent, Annie Machonrenowned BBC correspondent Alan HartUS Marine Ken O’keefe

there are more, but these are the ones I can list off the top of my head

Read the rest here:

9/11 Bill Maher vs Mos Def – YouTube

Related Post

December 8, 2017   Posted in: Lavon Affair |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."