SCLC and Confederate group clash over lawmaker’s MLK statue decision – Atlanta Journal Constitution

The president of the organization founded in 1957 by Martin Luther King Jr., said he wants the name of state Rep. Tommy Benton (R-Jefferson) included on a plaque that will accompany a statue of King that will soon be unveiled at the state capitol.

That is if Benton believes in justice.

But a member of organization charged with keeping the memory of the Confederacy alive says Benton has every right to remove his name from a statue honoring King. He said the lawmaker probably felt betrayed by his colleagues.

Earlier this month,Benton asked that his name be omitted completely from the statue after a request was made to everyone who was going to be included on the statue to double check the spelling of their names.

I want everybody name who was associated with the statue on the statue. In the spirit of Dr. King we want it, said SCLC President and CEO Charles Steele. If he believes, to any degree, in the upward mobility of what he is supposed to represent, he would want his name on there. But if you dont believe in freedom and justice, we dont want you.

That seems to be the question.

Benton, who was a prominent member of the House leadership, has seen a spiralling demotion to backbencher status, thanks to the controversial headlines he has been making lately.

Last week Benton forwarded an article titled The Absurdity of Slavery as the Cause of the War Between the States, to several members of the House, including House Speaker David Ralston, (R-Blue Ridge.)

Last Friday Ralston stripped Benton of his leadershipposition as chairman of the House Committee on Human Relations and Aging.

Ralston also bounced Benton off a study committee on civics education in Georgias public schools. Ralston had appointed him to the committee earlier this month.

The appointment was controversial, as Benton had spent the past two years making provocative comments about the Civil War, race relations and the Ku Klux Klan.

A clay modeling of the Martin Luther King Jr. statue to be placed on the state Capitol lawn in August. Courtesy Georgia Building Authority. Georgia Building Authority

Those demotions likely affected Bentons decision, said Grady Vickery, a member of Sons of Confederate Veterans in Dawsonville. Vickery does not personally know Benton, but supports Bentons statement that the Civil War was not started over slavery. He also supports Bentons failed moves to protect Confederate iconography in Georgia.

If you start taking down monuments to the Confederates, then before you know it youre going to go after statues of Martin Luther King, Vickery said. How are we going to teach our young people if we dont keep these benchmarks to show them what happened?

In an interview with the AJC published in January 2016,Benton said the Klan was not so much a racist thing but a vigilante thing to keep law and order.

It made a lot of people straighten up, he said. Im not saying what they did was right. Its just the way things were.

Steele said that there is an SCLC chapter in Jefferson and he is ready to mobilize a march.

It is not about him. It is about who he represents, Steele said. Can his district allow this kind of mindset to represent them? We need to take a trip down to his district and rally, because right now, it is an insult and belittles the progress that we as Americans have made.

View post:

SCLC and Confederate group clash over lawmaker’s MLK statue decision – Atlanta Journal Constitution

Related Post

June 21, 2017   Posted in: Martin Luther King |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."