For 4 Years, I Have Been Warning the World that the PKK Is an Israeli Front Organization that Wages War on Turkey on Behalf of Israel

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

When I heard that the Jews had attacked a Turkish vessel in the Freedom Flotilla, I immediately knew that the Israeli front organization the PKK would hit Turkey and Iran. I warned the Turks in the following blog article:

Watch Out Turkey and Iran, the Mossad Front Known as the “PKK” Is About to Move Against You! June 01, 2010

I did not then know that the PKK hit the Turks just after the Israeli assassination squad descended upon the Mavi Marmara. The story hit the press shortly after my warning appeared:

‘Israel may have ordered Kurdish terror attack’ June 6, 2010

Who is the PKK fighting for? June 5, 2010

I have been warning of this for four years, in among other places, the following blog articles dating back to September of 2006:

The “Jewish State” Is Fomenting World War III, September 20, 2006

Turks and Kurds, September 19, 2006

Coup d’Etat, September 29, 2006

The “Jewish State” Is Fomenting World War III: Part 2: More Evidence from the BBC, September 23, 2006

I have known of these facts for four years, the Turkish Government has undoubtedly known of them far longer, so why has not the Turkish Government done anything to prevent and punish the bloody Israeli military attacks committed against Turkey under the guise of the Mossad front known as the “PKK”? Why has not Erdogan publicly condemned what the Turkish press, the Israeli press and other Turkish politicians now freely discuss? Why has not the “alternative” press picked up on my warnings and done something to help me prevent this loss of life and march towards WWIII?

Sphere: Related Content

June 11, 2010   Posted in: Racism News |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."