Is "Whiteism" the Antidote to "Jewism"?
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com
Whites have several qualities which render them vulnerable to the Jews, but which can also be used to defeat the Jews and to promote the interests of the human race. Whites tend to be very conformist, surrender readily to authority, are capable of compassionless violence, seek “moral” justifications, can be persuaded to perform self-destructive actions based upon pseudo-rationales, and tend to be blindly religious. As such, the Whites have established an ancient and verifiable track record of destroying themselves and the human race for the benefit of the Jews, whom the Whites have historically worshiped.
The Jewists are utterly selfish, amoral and are only concerned with self-interest. As such, the Jews have established an ancient and verifiable track record of destroying humanity, focusing upon the Whites, for their own benefit.
Whiteist Whites have proven somewhat resistant to the Jewish parasite, though they have often and predominantly been used to promote Jewist interests, the foremost of which is Jewist segregationism, which coincides with and benefits from, one tiny facet of Whiteist segregationism.
Segregationism must be distinguished from absolute isolationism. The Jewists have always sought to promote the absolute isolationism of individual Whites from one another, but the Whiteists have yet to promote and enforce the absolute isolationism of Jews from one another.
Why, having recognized the Jewist People as an enemy, do Whiteists promote the tribalism of Jewists by insisting upon their segregation, and consequent perpetuation, with each other? If Whiteists truly seek to perpetuate White Europeans, then they must isolate each Jew from every other Jew and prevent the subsequent generations of the enemy Jewists who have pledged themselves to the destruction and extermination of Whites.
June 25, 2010
Posted in: Racism News
|
Fair Use Disclaimer
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.
Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:
"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
Loading ...