The "Turks" the Jews Killed Were Mostly Kurds, Perhaps Kurdish Mossad
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com
Back on 26 June 2010, I expressed my belief that the majority of those the Israelis murdered on the Mavi Marmara were Kurds, and, I suspect were Kurdish Mossad. I wrote, among other things,
“Israel’s brutal assault and murder of (Kurdish martyrs? Kurdish Mossad?) Turks provided the means to achieve this objective.”–History Repeats Itself in Turkey. . . Again: Why the Jews Created the AKP and Are Making a Hero Out of Erdogan, June 26, 2010
The following article confirms that seven of the nine were in fact Kurds:
Seven Kurds Were Among The Dead in Turkish Flotilla, Qaradaghi, August 10, 2010
Note the comments from readers which state that Kurds who work against Israel are traitors, because Israel is the Kurds’ ally. This again prompts the question if they were indeed Mossad working for Israel’s interests, which question I raised long ago.
Add to the mix the fact that AKP leaders were planning to participate in the voyage but later declined when they learned that it might cause problems with Israel, as reported in the New York Times:
Sponsor of Flotilla Tied to Elite of Turkey
I believe the whole operation was staged for the benefit of Israel and its puppet government in Turkey, the AKP and the military which are both arms of World Jewry, so as to make the Jews’ agents in Turkey leaders of the Muslim world, and so as to open the door to EU membership for Turkey so that the Jews can flood Europe with Africans and Asians and further erode the natural sovereignty of European nations, grossly expanding Jewish World Government.
It is telling how the AKP destroyed its own momentum against Israel and how it again and again protects Israeli and generally Jewish interests over Turkish interests.
August 14, 2010
Posted in: Racism News
|
Fair Use Disclaimer
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.
Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:
"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
Loading ...