Hatewatch Headlines 8/17/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

Politico: World leaders condemn Trumps obnoxious remarks on neo-Nazis.

The Cypher Brief: Trumps rhetoric empowers dangerous fringe-right violence, expert warns.

Think Progress: There is no comparison between Black Lives Matter and white supremacists.

New York Magazine: Dont look now, but nine alt-right demonstrations are planned for nine cities this weekend.

Right Wing Watch: Charlottesville racists try to cover their tracks by denying rally violence, neo-Nazi presence.

PBS NewsHour: Matthew Heimbach excuses violence in Virginia by blaming the victim.

Washington Post: PayPal escalates the tech industrys war on white supremacy.

Gizmodo: Cloudflare CEO on terminating service to neo-Nazi site: The Daily Stormer are assholes.

The Outline: Squarespace is dropping Richard Spencers think tank and other alt-right websites.

The Hill: University of Florida blocks Richard Spencer event over safety concerns.

Media Matters: Colorado Mountain Resort cancels plans to host white-nationalist VDare conference after wide criticism.

New York Times: Trump lawyer forwards email echoing neo-Confederate secessionist rhetoric.

NBC News: Alt-right troll Jack Posobiec, retweeted by Trump, is a U.S. naval intelligence officer.

Talking Points Memo: Alabama attorney general sues Birmingham and its mayor over Confederate monument removal.

CNN: Man misidentified as Charlottesville driver has to flee home, plans lawsuit against alt-right websites.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution (GA): Ku Klux Klan request to burn cross on Stone Mountain is denied.

San Francisco Examiner: Electrician no longer employed after speech at Charlottesville white-supremacist rally.

The rest is here:

Hatewatch Headlines 8/17/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

Related Post

August 17, 2017   Posted in: Southern Poverty Law Center |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."