Hatewatch Headlines 8/21/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

Mother Jones: Tens of thousands of people just showed Nazis what really makes America great.

American Prospect: Why white supremacists stand by Trump, and why he returns the favor.

Think Progress: Rush Limbaugh says white supremacists and the KKK are not the problem, warns of second civil war.

New York Times: In their own words, what some of the key Charlottesville marchers stand for.

Talking Points Memo: Ex-DHS chief Jeh Johnson warns that Confederate statues are now rallying point for hate groups.

Washington Post: The whole point of Confederate monuments is to celebrate white supremacy.

Politico: Some 1,503 Confederate monuments are on display across America, and 179 are in black majority counties.

Salon: Our troll-in-chief has a deep affinity with the alt-right and its Nazi ancestors.

ProPublica: Despite disavowals, leading tech companies help extremist sites monetize hate.

TechCrunch: Google and ProPublica team up to build a national hate-crime database.

BuzzFeed: Twitter grapples with verified white supremacists as other tech companies crack down on hate speech.

Huffington Post: Its not just Trump, federal law enforcement is not very focused on white supremacism.

Raw Story: Is the Trump administration hiring people of color to hold signs at his Phoenix rally?

Right Wing Watch: Kentucky governor links Charlottesville violence to removal of Bible study from schools.

WISN-TV (Milwaukee, WI): Mayor speaks out against planned anti-Muslim rally led by ACT for America.

Seattle Times: Resurgent hate groups have a long history in Washington state and the Pacific Northwest.

Oregonian: Notorious Oregon neo-Nazi takes credit for anti-Semitic freeway signs ahead of 2017 eclipse.

Read more from the original source:

Hatewatch Headlines 8/21/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

Related Post

August 21, 2017   Posted in: Southern Poverty Law Center |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."