Hatewatch Headlines 8/22/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

New York Times Magazine: How hate groups forced online platforms to reveal their true nature.

GQ: Dylann Roof: The making of a very American terrorist.

Politico: How a man who shot video of the Charlottesville rampage became embroiled in conspiracy theories.

Washington Post: The shadow of a Nazi assassinated in 1967 hangs over Charlottesville.

USA Today: White supremacists plan monument protest, summit in Tennessee.

Houston Chronicle: Houston man charged with trying to plant bomb at base of Confederate monument.

Media Matters: Media shouldnt sugarcoat Trumps calls for violence and hate.

Current Affairs: How to write about Nazis and how not to.

Columbia Journalism Review: The white-supremacist threat deserves its own beat in newsrooms.

New Statesman: We need to talk about the online radicalization of young white women, too.

AlterNet: White communities need to ferret out the domestic terrorists in their midst.

ABC News: White nationalist leaders on their beliefs: We look up to men like Adolf Hitler.

Think Progress: Historians of Christian nationalism are alarmed by its appearance in American pulpits.

Quartz: Linguistic analysis of three billion Reddit comments shows the alt-right is getting stronger.

CNN: Trump nominee Sam Clovis says logical LGBT protections could lead to legalization of pedophilia.

KCUR-FM (Kansas City, MO): Missouri militia counters social-justice rally on Kansas Citys Country Club Plaza.

AL.com: Groups organize for, against Auburn High teachers Pride flag in his classroom.

KPIX-TV (San Francisco): Armed Oath Keepers militia group expected to attend San Francisco far-right rally.

Raw Story: Alt-right cancels California book burning of degenerate literature after organizer says he fears liberals.

Huffington Post: Law firm boots patent attorney who owns neo-Nazi record label on the side.

Go here to read the rest:

Hatewatch Headlines 8/22/2017 – Southern Poverty Law Center

Related Post

August 22, 2017   Posted in: Southern Poverty Law Center |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."