Expose SPLC | Expose SPLC

Dear Concerned Friend,

Traditional Conservative and Christian groups are being labeled as hate groups by the mainstream media.

Why?

Because of the lies and deceit from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

According to the SPLC, support for traditional marriage and criticism of radical Islam both constitute hate.

And because of that, the SPLC has added legitimate conservative and Christian groups, including the Pacific Justice Institute, Alliance Defending Freedom, the Family Research Council, Liberty Counsel, and American Family Association to its Hate Map.

Theyre listed right alongside violent hate groups such as the KKK, neo-Nazis and white separatists. Also listed as haters: former Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, conservative authors Dinesh DSouza and David Horowitz and anti-radical Muslims Majiid Nawaz and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

This false and unfair categorization is well-known yet the mainstream media treats the Hate Map as if its the gospel truth, blindly parroting the SPLCs libelous claims.

The SPLC has devolved from an organization that once fought against real hate groups, such as the KKK, and has become a hate group itself.

It holds a powerful, national position as judge, jury, and executioner, labeling any group that opposes its extreme progressive ideology as a hate group. The SPLCs goal: To silence anyone it disagrees with and to drive traditional conservatives and Christians from the public square.

Under a false veneer of objectivity, the SPLC serves as the medias expert witness for evaluating extremism and hate. When the SPLC adds another name to its Hate Group List, the media comes running for another salacious story.

Again, and again, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC and other members of the mainstream media unethically tell viewers that reputable groups such as the Pacific Justice Institute and the Family Research Council, and conservatives such as Senator Rand Paul, Reverand Franklin Graham,and David Horowitz are haters, based solely on the SPLCs claims.

And these false labels do more than just damage reputations. They can also spark erratic violence.For example, in 2012, a liberal activist named Floyd Corkins shot up the Family Research Council offices in Washington, D.C. Corkins told the FBI he picked his target from the SPLCs hate group website.

It also appears that James Hodgkinson, the man who shot Congressman Steve Scalise during Republican baseball practice in June, was inspired by the SPLC.

The good news is, you now have a chance to fight back. I invite you to sign the petition below that will be sent:

To the media

Their advertisers

Corporate Donors, such as Apple

To express your disapproval of using the SPLCs Hate Map as a resource for identifying hate groups, please sign the petition below.

The rest is here:

Expose SPLC | Expose SPLC

Related Post

January 31, 2018   Posted in: SPLC |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."