Newsweek relies on misleading SPLC labels in reports on Trump …

The Southern Poverty Law Center’s credibility as an objective assessor of hate has long been disputed by observers on both the Left and the Right, but that didn’t stop Newsweek from running misleading stories based on the organization’s labels this week.

“Donald Trump to speak at hate group’s annual event, a first for a president,” blared an Oct. 12 headline. “Trump tells hate group Americans ‘worship God,’ not government,” said another published Friday.

Both articles focused on President Trump’s address at the Family Research Council’s annual Values Voter Summit, a conference sponsored and attended by many mainstream conservative organizations and politicians.

Here’s an excerpt from the first article:

No other sitting president has ever taken the decision to address the summit, although Trump has spoken before the conference on three previous occasions even during his presidential election campaign.Speaking of the president’s decision to attend this year’s 12th annual event, SPLC President Richard Cohen told The Independent: “By appearing at the Values Voter Summit, President Trump is lending the legitimacy of his office to a hate group that relentlessly demonizes LGBTQ people and works to deny them of their equal rights.””His appearance puts the lie to his campaign promise to be a friend to the LGBTQ community. Bigotry is not an American value, and our president should speak out against it,” he added.

The second article also said: “Trump, the first sitting president to attend the event hosted by Family Research Council (FRC), a group that has been labeled a hate group by Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), also boasted that his administration was making rapid progress in protecting religious liberty.”

Neither story included any details about FRC’s vigorous disputing of the SPLC’s designation, nor a single mention of the pushback the SPLC has received from both conservatives and liberals for labeling right-leaning, pro-family organizations as hate groups.

We’ve spilled much ink explaining why the SPLC’s strategy of lumping traditional conservative advocacy organizations into the same category as neo-Nazis and the KKK is reckless and dangerous. Just five years ago, a gunman opened fire at FRC’s Washington, D.C., headquarters, leaving a security guard injured. He later acknowledged that he had intended to kill dozens and chose his target after he saw the organization was listed as a hate group on the SPLC website.

Liberal journalist Ken Silverstein, who has reported extensively on the SPLC, wrote in 2010 that the nonprofit is “essentially a fraud” with “a habit of casually labeling organizations as ‘hate groups.'”

None of this stopped Newsweek.

Because society has long reserved the term “hate group” for neo-Nazi and KKK organizations, readers who come across these headlines could seriously believe the president was addressing a crowd of white supremacists, rather than Christian conservatives.

But, hey, as my colleague Becket Adams highlighted on Monday, Newsweek has been struggling lately.

Emily Jashinsky is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

See original here:

Newsweek relies on misleading SPLC labels in reports on Trump …

Related Post

October 19, 2017   Posted in: SPLC |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."