Presidential Hopeful Ben Carson Is an 'Extremist,' Says Civil Rights Group

Eyeing the White House won’t keep anti-LGBT politicians from being called out by progressive groups, former neurosurgeon and 2016 hopeful Ben Carson learned this week.

Ben Carson

The Southern Poverty Law Center has added former neurosurgeon and right-wing darling Ben Carson to its roster of anti-LGBT extremists, making him the only possible 2016 presidential contender included on the list.

“Carsons own story as an ‘up by the bootstraps’ black man reared in poverty translated into an inspiring, magnetic narrative that captured media attention,” reads SPLC’s profile on Carson. “A movement to draft Carson as a presidential candidate took off in 2014, raising more than $7 million by June, according to its website. Carson has coyly declined to say whether he would run as a Republican or on a third-party ticket, but media interviews suggest that he is increasingly willing to run on some ticket.”

Carson is one of the newest additions to SPLC’s Extremist Files, along with other prominent anti-LGBT activists who have long held sway on the list like Family Research Council leader Tony Perkins, Westboro Baptist Church founder Fred Phelps, and failed Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate and evangelical preacher Scott Lively, who is currently facing an international lawsuit alleging crimes against humanity for his involvement in convincing Ugandan lawmakers to pass the country’s infamous “Jail the Gays” bill.

Carson’s inclusion on the progressive group’s list of anti-LGBT hate-mongers is well-earned. After rising to prominence for publicly scolding Barack Obama’s healthcare and tax reform policies at the President’s National Prayer Breakfast in early 2013, Carson used his right-wing notoriety to equate marriage equality with pedophilia and bestiality, a false comparison that resulted in students at Johns Hopkins University, where Carson is a faculty member, protesting his invitation to speak at the 2013 graduation ceremony. Although Carson tepidly backtracked on his marriage equality-pedophilia comparison, he ultimately withdrew from the commencement, but only while playing the victim and claiming he had been silenced by a culture of “political correctness.”

Carson frequently cites his Christian faith when backtracking on anti-LGBT comments, and the news of his appointment to SPLC’s Extremist Files was no different.

“When embracing traditional Christian values is equated to hatred, we are approaching the stage where wrong is called right and right is called wrong,” Carson told conservative media outlet Breitbart, according to The Huffington Post. “It is important for us to once again advocate true tolerance. That means being respectful of those with whom we disagree and allowing people to live according to their values without harassment.”

Last year, Carson said that marriage equality was an “extra right,” claiming that “of course” he believed gay and lesbian Americans should have the same rights as straight Americans, “but they don’t get extra rights, they don’t get to redefine marriage.”

Most recently, Carson made a tone-deaf “joke” claiming that same-sex couples should not ask antigay bakeries to serve their weddings, since “they might put poison in that cake.” The remark, made in January at the right-wing gathering known as the Iowa Freedom Summit, was met with “chuckles from some of [Carson’s] staff and dead silence from the journalists in the room,” reported The Hill. Carson later told Fox News that those who took offense at his joke which seemed to advocate poisoning same-sex couples who expect bakeries open to the public to serve the public equally were being “immature.”

Read more:

Presidential Hopeful Ben Carson Is an 'Extremist,' Says Civil Rights Group

Related Post

February 10, 2015   Posted in: SPLC |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."