Southern Poverty Law Center Admits Shooter ‘Liked’ Its Facebook … – Breitbart News

But it did not retract any of the criticism of Majority Whip Steve Scales (R-LA), who remains in critical condition at a local hospital.

James T. Hodgkinson, 66, of Belleville, Ill., who shot Scalise and four others, died of his wounds after first responders successfully stopped his rampage.

The attack on members of Congress and their staffs today was a sickening and cowardly act of terror that must be condemned by everyone across the political spectrum, Richard Cohen, president of SPLC said in a statement. Any violent attack on our political leadership is an attack on our democracy.

Were aware that the SPLC was among hundreds of groups that the man identified as the shooter liked on Facebook, the statement said. I want to be as clear as I can possibly be: The SPLC condemns all forms of violence.

We have worked for decades to combat domestic terrorism and violence based on hate, Cohen said in the statement, entitled Attack on GOP Congressmen is Assault on Democracy.

Our hearts are with those who were injured today and the families of all who have been affected by this deplorable act, Cohen said. We hope and pray for their full recovery.

But in posts on its website dating back to 2014, SPLC had repeatedly implied that Scalise associated with white supremacists and other groups the organization had deemed hate groups, including the Family Research Center where a gunman attacked the conservative, Christian groups headquarters in Washington, D.C. in 2012 and later told law enforcement that he was inspired by SPLCs Hate Map.

In its Spring Intelligence Report in 2015, SPLC implied that because Scalise lives in the same state as Ku Klux Klan members, he associated with them.

In fact, Scalise, who hails from the same Louisiana parish as Duke and Knight, may have had some real affinities with EURO. In 1999, Roll Call reported that Scalise said he embraces many of the same conservative views as Duke, but is more viable. Scalise also reportedly told a columnist that his politics were similar to Dukes, but without the baggage.’

In December of 2014, SPLC attacked Scalise for allegedly speaking at a gathering that included white supremacists.

Faced with an exploding crisis sparked by the revelation that the No. 3 Republican in the House gave a speech to a well-known group of white supremacists and neo-Nazis a dozen years ago, the GOP in Rep. Steve Scalises home state of Louisiana is doubling down, calling the entire episode a mere manufactured blogger story,’ SPLC wrote.

Really? A manufactured blogger story? SPLC wrote, adding:

Scalise claimed yesterday that he had no idea of the views promoted by the European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO), whose workshop he addressed in 2002 at a hotel in Metairie, La. And he was backed by an array of Louisiana Republicans including state GOP chair Roger Villere Jr., who described Scalise as a man of great integrity who embodies his Christian faith in his life.

Villere dismissed the story broken by Louisiana blogger Lamar White Jr. as an attempt to score political points by slandering the character of a good man.

But Scalises claim of ignorance is almost impossible to believe, SPLC wrote. He was a state representative and an aspiring national politician at the time, and Louisiana-based EURO already was well known as a hate group led by Americas most famous white supremacist.


Here is the original post:

Southern Poverty Law Center Admits Shooter ‘Liked’ Its Facebook … – Breitbart News

Related Post

June 16, 2017   Posted in: SPLC |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."